The Effect of Doxazosin, Finasteride and Combination Therapy on Nocturia in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Association between before-bedtime passive body heating and nocturia during the cold season among older adults

Background Cold exposure induces lower urinary tract symptoms including nocturia. Cold-induced detrusor overactivity can be alleviated by increasing skin temperature in rats. However, no study has shown an association between passive heating with hot-water bathing and nocturia among humans.Methods We included 1,051 Japanese community-dwelling older adults (mean age 71.7 years) in this cross-sectional study from 2010 to 2014. The number of nocturnal voids was recorded in a self-administered urination diary. Nocturia was defined as ≥2 nocturnal voids. We evaluated bathing conditions in the participants' houses.Results Hot-water bathing (n = 888) was associated with a lower prevalence of nocturia than no bathing (n = 163), independent of potential confounders including age, sex, obesity, income, physical activity, diabetes, medication (diuretics, nondiuretic antihypertensives, and hypnotics), depressive symptoms, indoor/outdoor temperature, and day length (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.97; p = 0.035). Compared with the quartile group with the longest bath-to-bed interval (range: 161-576 min), the second and third quartile groups (range: 61-100 and 101-160 min, respectively) were associated with a lower prevalence of nocturia, after adjusting for water temperature and bathing duration besides the same covariates (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.96; p = 0.031 and OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94; p = 0.025, respectively).Conclusion Hot-water bathing, particularly with a bath-to-bed interval of 61-160 min, was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of nocturia among older adults.

Pharmacotherapeutic options in the treatment of nocturia: update on current oral drug therapies

INTRODUCTION

Nocturia is a common urinary complaint among patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and in recent years, there is a greater emphasis to tailor the treatment for nocturia in a more holistic and multidisciplinary manner given the potential multifactorial causes for nocturia.

AREAS COVERED

Current oral drug therapies can be classified into three main groups, namely, decreasing polyuria, targeting bladder capacity, and improving sleep-wake and circadian rhythm. The authors focus this article on these oral therapies and provide their expert opinion.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment strategies should always involve lifestyle changes and behavioral modifications, with the targeted treatment of underlying medical conditions that may cause nocturia. Desmopressin remains the only drug approved specifically for the treatment of nocturia. Medications targeting the bladder and prostate can have secondary benefits in minimizing nocturnal frequency and urgency especially if the drug is taken at nighttime. Treatment of an underlying sleep disorder or circadian disorder can often help to increase total sleep time and quality, and perhaps reducing the nocturnal diuresis and nocturia episodes. Future studies in nocturia should improve the identification and diagnosis of underlying mechanisms that lead to nocturia, so treatment can become more streamlined, while at the same time, explore the role of various pharmacotherapeutic agents and novel therapy to reduce or eliminate nocturia.

Managing Nocturia in Frail Older Adults

This review discusses the available evidence in the current evaluation and treatment of nocturia in frail older adults. No evidence specifically evaluates the use of behavioral interventions in the treatment of the frail older adult with nocturia, but their use is supported in other cohorts. Behavioral modifications and optimal management of comorbidities remain the first-line treatment for all age groups and should be emphasized in the frail due to their favorable safety profile. No studies specific to the frail older adult support the use of pharmacotherapy. Some evidence exists for the efficacy of several agents in the older adult; however, this is difficult to extrapolate to the frail, and safety concerns abound. Desmopressin may be effective in the older adult, but a high risk of hyponatremia raises concerns for its safety, and therefore it is not recommended in the frail. α-Antagonists may have limited efficacy in men with known benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); they are relatively well tolerated, although the risk of orthostatic hypotension in the frail should be considered. β3-agonist trials suggest limited clinical utility. Antimuscarinics are not found to be useful in this cohort and are contraindicated in the frail older adult given the ability of antimuscarinics to cause cognitive impairment, delirium, and falls. No data examine the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the frail older adult. Additionally, the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria recommends against the use of muscarinics in those over the age of 75 years and therefore their use is not supported.

[Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to nocturia in Primary Care]

Nocturia is the interruption of the main sleep, one or more times, due to the need for urination. It is associated with a decrease in the quality of life and an increase in mortality. It is a complex and multifactorial symptom in which two pathophysiological mechanisms are mainly involved. These occur alone or in combination as nocturnal polyuria or decreased bladder capacity. Nocturnal polyuria is the most frequent. The preparation of a bladder diary is the key to diagnosis. Treatment usually combines lifestyle changes and drug therapy. Desmopressin has proven to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with nocturnal polyuria. The risk of hyponatraemia should be controlled in patients treated with desmopressin.

A systematic approach to the investigation and treatment of nocturia

Level of evidence: 4.

Doxazosin treatment in cocaine use disorder: pharmacogenetic response based on an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor subtype D genetic variant

Background: The α₁ antagonist doxazosin reduces cocaine use in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD) through a functional polymorphism of the α₁ adrenoreceptor. The regulatory role of the α₁ adrenoreceptor subtype D (ADRA1D) gene polymorphism in CUD is uncharacterized.Objectives: To study how the genetic variant of ADRA1D gene (T1848A, rs2236554) may affect the treatment efficacy of doxazosin in reducing cocaine use.Methods: This 12-week pilot trial included 76 participants with CUD with ADRA1D (T1848A, rs2236554) AA (N = 40) or AT/TT genotype (N = 36). Participants were randomized to doxazosin (8 mg/day, N = 47) or placebo (N = 29), and followed with thrice weekly urine toxicology and once weekly cognitive behavioral psychotherapy.Results: The AA and the AT/TT groups had comparable baseline rates of cocaine positive urines at weeks 1-2 (~ 76%). In the placebo group, an increase of cocaine positive urines in the AT/TT group was found as compared to the AA group (24% vs. 9%). In the doxazosin group, a greater decrease in cocaine positive urines was found in the AT/TT group relative to the AA group. The difference between the doxazosin and placebo groups in cocaine negative urines became evident at weeks 5-6 and peaked at weeks 9-10 (~35% difference). The AT/TT group demonstrated a significant medication and time by medication effect (p < .001), whereas the AA group did not.Conclusion: The T-allele carriers showed a greater reduction of cocaine use after treatment with doxazosin in participants with the ADRA1D gene polymorphism (T1848A), suggesting that this SNP may serve as a pharmacogenetic marker in pharmacotherapy of CUD.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Dose Escalation Therapy in Male Patients With Nocturia Refractory to 0.2-mg Tamsulosin Monotherapy

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.4 mg of tamsulosin in patients with nocturia not responding to 0.2 mg.

Methods

Patients with intractable nocturia after treatment with 0.2 mg of tamsulosin for>1 month were included in a multicenter, prospective, observational, single-arm study. Patients were prescribed 0.4 mg of tamsulosin and followed up for 2 months to assess nocturnal voiding and nocturia-related bother. Changes in the mean number of nocturnal voids, the proportion of 50% responders, 3-day frequency-volume chart parameters, and questionnaire scores were assessed.

Results

Sixty-two patients were prescribed 0.2 mg of tamsulosin, of whom 56 were prescribed 0.4 mg of tamsulosin. Ten patients dropped out. A single case of orthostatic hypotension was reported. The mean age was 68 years. After 1 and 2 months of taking 0.4 mg of tamsulosin, 23.9% and 22.7% of patients demonstrated a>50% reduction of nocturia, and 16.1% and 19.4% of patients rated the treatment as “very effective,” respectively. Dose escalation to 0.4 mg of tamsulosin, compared to 0.2 mg, did not show an additional effect on reducing nocturnal urine volume. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lower serum sodium levels (odds ratio [OR], 0.41, P=0.037) and the presence of urge incontinence (OR, 7.08, P=0.036) were predictors of a significant improvement of nocturia in response to 0.4 mg of tamsulosin.

Conclusions

Dose escalation may yield a significant improvement of nocturia in>20% of patients, and may be especially helpful in patients with lower sodium levels and urge incontinence.

Management Strategies for Nocturia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nocturia is defined as awakening due to the desire to void during a period of intended sleep. The pathophysiology of nocturia is multifactorial and management remains a challenge. Herein, we provide an overview of the management strategies for nocturia and summarize the existing evidence for treatment of nocturia across the condition's broad etiologic categories: nocturnal polyuria, diminished bladder capacity, and global polyuria.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment should begin with behavioral modification. A high level of evidence supports the efficacy of desmopressin in the treatment of nocturnal polyuria. Data supporting the efficacy of α-blockers, antimuscarinics, and surgical bladder outlet procedures in the treatment of nocturia remains limited. Treatment options for nocturia are determined by underlying mechanism. Desmopressin is effective in treating nocturnal polyuria. Surgical intervention, α-blockers, and antimuscarinics may improve nocturia when associated with lower urinary tract symptoms or overactive bladder in the setting of diminished bladder capacity.

Incidence of Nocturia in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement and Outcomes After Medical Treatment: Results from the Evolution European Association of Urology Research Foundation Prospective Multinational Registry

BACKGROUND

Nocturia is one of the most prevalent and bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, leading to increased morbidity and mortality and a considerable economic burden on healthcare systems. Understanding its natural history, effect of pharmacotherapy, and predictors of failure of pharmacotherapy would allow optimised patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and effect of clinically relevant nocturia (crN) on quality of life in a contemporary cohort of European men aged ≥50 yr in a "real-life" setting, to understand its natural history, to detect any effect of pharmacotherapy, and to identify predictors of pharmacotherapy failure.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a secondary analysis of the data from the Evolution Registry-a European, multicentre, prospective, observational registry, conducted in five European countries within a sample of general practitioners' and urologists' clinics. A consecutive sample of 2175 men aged ≥50 yr with LUTS in association with benign prostatic enlargement was enrolled between February 2010 and April 2011, and followed up for 2yr. Overall, data from 1838 men were suitable for analysis.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was evaluation of the baseline incidence of nocturia in the study population. Secondary outcomes included the impact of nocturia on quality of life, efficacy of pharmacotherapy, and predictive factors associated with persistence of nocturia. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the data. Logistic regressions were used to analyse associations between comorbid conditions and risk factors in men with nocturia.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 1198 men (65%) reported crN (two or more voids per night). This increased age dependently from 59% in the 50-59-yr age group (n=74) to 89% in the 80-99-yr age group (n=25). Overall, the incidence of crN improved in those who commenced pharmacological treatment at study entry, from 69% at baseline to 49% at 24 mo (p<0.00001). This was statistically significant only in those <80 yr old. A weak correlation was found between the severity of nocturia at baseline and quality-of-life scores on the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire (r=0.33, p<0.001). Of the patients treated with an alpha-blocker or a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, 62% still had crN at 24 mo.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost two-thirds of men in the Evolution Registry reported clinically significant nocturia with increased incidence with age. Despite prostate-targeted treatment, most patients, especially older men, still had persistent or worsening nocturia at 2-yr follow-up, and in this study, it was not possible to identify specific clinical factors that predicted those who could respond well to treatment in this regard.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This large study of men from five different European countries has shown that waking up at night to pass urine (nocturia) is very common and becomes more common with older age, and treatments that target the prostate do not significantly improve symptoms over 2yr in most men.

The discrepancy between European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines and daily practice in the evaluation and management of nocturia: results of a Dutch survey

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In addition to the evaluation of voiding symptoms, in the evaluation of patients with nocturia, one should also consider other related causes such as sleep disorders, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSAS), diabetes and heart failure. In this study, we have aimed to assess the current knowledge and implementation of the EAU guidelines regarding nocturia in common urological practice in the Netherlands.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In a national cross-sectional survey distributed among 450 urologists and urology residents in the Netherlands, the implementation of the recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on nocturia evaluation and management was studied.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

This survey revealed that only some aspects of the EAU guidelines are applied in the daily clinical practice and that some important parts are not. For example, only a minority asks about alcohol consumption and symptoms suggestive for diabetes or OSAS. In addition, a majority reported to use a bladder diary for 1-3 days instead of for a minimum of 3 days as recommended by the EAU guidelines. In the management of nocturia, a trial of timed diuretic therapy is only reported by a minority, whereas the use of beta-3 antagonists, which is not mentioned in the guidelines, is applied by a large majority. Desmopressin recommended for nocturnal polyuria is prescribed by two-third of Dutch urologists.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations mandate better education and campaigns to raise the awareness on the EAU-guideline recommendations for nocturia.

The evaluation of nocturia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the analysis of the curative effect after medical or placebo therapy for nocturia: a randomized placebo-controlled study

Background

To study nocturia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) after medical or placebo treatment.

Methods

Patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH from several community clinics were included. Patients completed the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) questionnaire and a 3-day voiding diary. Urinalysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, and prostate ultrasonography were performed. Nocturnal polyuria (NP) was defined as a nocturnal urine fraction exceeding one third of the daily urine output in elderly men. A total of 148 outpatients were randomized to drug treatment (tamsulosin) or placebo treatment. After 8 weeks of treatment, they were re-evaluated using a 3-day voiding diary, PSA measurement, prostate volume (PV), I-PSS, etc.

Results

The average I-PSS score was 20.3, storage symptom score was 11.7, voiding symptom score was 8.6, quality of life (QoL) score was 3.7, PV was 40.4 ± 19.4 ml, and nocturnal urine volume (NUV) was 845.7 ± 339.0 ml. The mean frequency of nocturia was 2.3 ± 1.1 per day, and 94% of the patients had a nocturia frequency of more than two times per day. Of these patients, 76.5% had NP. A significant correlation was found between NUV and the amount of water intake at night and 4 h before sleep (r = 0.419,P = 0.002; r = 0.302,P = 0.031). Eighty patients were randomized to drug treatment (tamsulosin) and 68 patients were randomized to placebo treatment. The I-PSS score was 16.8 ± 4.9 to 19.3 ± 5.0 (p = 0.002), the storage symptom score was 10.3 ± 3.4 to 10.7 ± 3.4 (p = 0.007), and the voiding symptom score was 7.5 ± 2.4 to 8.6 ± 2.3 (p = 0.003). The frequency of daytime urination was 7.5 ± 2.6 to 8.1 ± 2.6 (p = 0.002), maximum urine volume (ml) was 372.8 ± 103.3 to 302.8 ± 119.3 (p = 0.007), and morning urine volume (ml) was 280.5 ± 111.7 to 259.5 ± 100.7 (p = 0.003). However, the frequency of nocturia score was 2.8 ± 0.7 to 3.0 ± 0.6 (p = 0.306) and the nocturnal urine volume (ml) was 800.7 ± 323.0 to 845.7 ± 303.5 (p = 0.056), which did not change significantly. There were significant differences between the NP and non-NP groups in the duration of LUTS, first voided urine volume, daytime urination frequency, and the amount of water intake at night and 4 h before sleep.

Conclusions

Among the symptoms of LUTS, the improvement rates for nocturia were the lowest after medical treatment for BPH. The α-blockers did not improve nocturia, which was a common symptom accompanying LUTS suggestive of BPH. Our results showed that the prevalence of NP was 76.5% and that NP was significantly related to the amount of water intake during the evening and before sleep.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry, Trial registration number (TRN): ISRCTN85509614, Date of registration: 30/10/2018. This trial was registered retrospectively.

Pharmacotherapy for Nocturia

Purpose of Review

To assess current pharmacological principles used for treatment of nocturia/nocturnal polyuria.

Recent Findings

The pathophysiology of nocturia is often multifactorial, but two main mechanisms have been identified, occurring alone or in combination: low functional bladder capacity and nocturnal polyuria. The multifactorial pathophysiology not only implies several possible targets for therapeutic intervention but also means that it is unlikely that one treatment modality including drugs will be successful in all patients. Drugs approved for the treatment of male LUTS and male and female OAB are known to be far more effective for treatment of the daytime symptoms than for nocturia.

Summary

Several pharmacological principles have been tested with varying success. The treatment of choice should depend upon the main underlying cause, thus aiming primarily to increase bladder capacity by counteracting detrusor overactivity and/or reducing nocturnal polyuria. Using current available agents, effective, personalized treatment should be designed taking into account gender, co-morbidities, and identified etiological factors. However, there is a medical need for new, approved drugs for treatments for patients with nocturia.

Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men

BACKGROUND

Nocturia is the bothersome symptom of awakening one or more times per night to void. Desmopressin is a commonly used medication for treating nocturia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of desmopressin as compared to other interventions in the treatment of nocturia in men.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of medical literature with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. The date of the latest search of all databases was August 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized or quasi-randomized trials. Inclusion criteria were men with nocturia defined as one or more voids per night. Trials of children, adults with primary or secondary enuresis or underlying distinct disorders were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 studies with 2966 randomized men across five comparisons. Desmopressin versus placebo: based on short-term follow-up (up to three months), desmopressin may have a similar effect on the number of nocturnal voids (mean difference (MD) -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.94 to 0.01; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of desmopressin on major adverse events at short-term follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.10 to 9.03; very low-quality evidence). For intermediate-term follow-up (three to 12 months), desmopressin may reduce the number of nocturnal voids in an appreciable number of participants (MD -0.85, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.53; low-quality evidence). Desmopressin may result in little or no difference in major adverse events at intermediate-term follow-up (RR 3.05, 95% CI 0.13 to 73.39; low-quality evidence). We found no evidence on quality of life. Subgroup analyses suggest a larger effect with oral, higher-dose formulations of desmopressin and in men with documented nocturnal polyuria. Desmopressin versus behavior modification: there were no data regarding the effect on the number of nocturnal voids, quality of life, or major adverse events. Desmopressin versus alpha-blocker: based on short-term follow-up, desmopressin likely has a similar effect on the number of nocturnal voids (MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.80; moderate-quality evidence) and quality of life (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.35; moderate-quality evidence). There were no major adverse events in either study group. Desmopressin plus alpha-blocker versus alpha-blocker alone: based on short-term follow-up, combination therapy likely results in a small, unimportant reduction in the number of nocturnal voids (MD -0.47, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.21; moderate-quality evidence) and quality of life (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.07; moderate-quality evidence). The risk of major adverse events may be similar (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.32; low-quality evidence). Desmopressin plus alpha-blocker versus alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic: based on short-term follow-up, combination therapy likely results in little or no difference in the number of nocturnal voids (MD -0.43, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.11; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence on quality of life. There were no major adverse events in either study group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Desmopressin may reduce the number of nocturnal voids in an appreciable number of participants compared to placebo in intermediate-term (three to 12 months) follow-up without increase in major adverse events. We found no evidence to compare its effects to behavior modification. The effect on the number of nocturnal voids is likely similar to that of alpha-blockers short-term with very infrequent major adverse events. There appears to be no added benefit in the combined use of desmopressin with an alpha-blocker or an anticholinergic. The findings of this review were limited by short-term follow-up, study limitations, and imprecision.

Nocturia: consequences, classification, and management

Nocturia is a widespread condition that can negatively impact quality of sleep and overall health. This condition is multifactorial in nature and is best approached through the analysis of frequency volume charts. Through these charts, clinicians may classify each individual case of nocturia into one of four distinct categories: global polyuria, nocturnal polyuria, reduced bladder capacity, and mixed. Treatments should then be tailored to each individual based upon the category of their nocturia. In some cases, appropriate therapy will consist of behavioral modification techniques or addressing underlying systemic diseases. In other cases, medical therapy may be necessary, but, to date, medications have shown limited efficacy at treating nocturia.

Pilot Results from a Randomized Trial in Men Comparing Alpha-Adrenergic Antagonist versus Behavior and Exercise for Nocturia and Sleep

PURPOSE

Nocturia and sleep problems are common in older adults. We developed and tested a novel intervention, multicomponent behavioral treatment and exercise therapy (M-BET), that may reduce nocturia and improve sleep in men. We compared reductions in nocturia and improvement in sleep in men with M-BET versus an active drug comparator (α-blocker) used alone or in combination (M-BET + α-blocker) METHODS: This randomized, controlled trial was conducted in the ambulatory setting in 2 US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers in men at least 40 years of age with nocturia (defined as ≥2 nightly episodes). Participants were randomized to receive either M-BET, including pelvic floor muscle training, urge-suppression techniques, delayed voiding, fluid management, sleep hygiene, and peripheral edema management; an active comparator of known efficacy (the α-blocker tamsulosin, one 0.4-mg tablet nightly); or both therapies combined. Participants received interventions over 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed via voiding diaries, wrist actigraphy, and validated questionnaires. The primary outcome was change in diary-recorded nocturia, assessed using ANCOVA for the between-group changes and paired t tests for within-group changes.

FINDINGS

A total of 72 men with a mean age of 65.8 years participated. At 12 weeks, mean diary-recorded nocturia changed with M-BET by -1.39 episodes/night (P < 0.001), with α-blocker therapy by -0.59 episodes/night (P < 0.01), and with combination therapy by -1.03 episodes/night (P < 0.01). Reductions were not statistically different across treatment groups (P = 0.41). M-BET also showed statistically significant improvements in sleep quality, bother from nocturia, and nocturia-specific quality of life. All treatment groups indicated global satisfaction with treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

Behavioral therapy in men, alone or combined with α-blocker therapy, consistently showed large and statistically significant nocturia reductions and favorable effects on sleep and quality of life. Based on these findings, behavioral therapy, while not statistically superior to α-blocker therapy, may provide a meaningful treatment option for men with nocturia. Future research should include the development of behavioral treatment and exercise therapy interventions that could be more easily deployed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00824200.

Nocturia: aetiology and treatment in adults

Nocturia is an extremely common condition that has major sequelae for affected patients. Through disruption of sleep, nocturia impairs quality of life and worsens health outcomes, and is associated with a variety of morbidities including diabetes, coronary artery disease, obstructive sleep apnoea, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and depression. Unsurprisingly, several studies have also linked nocturia with reduced survival. Nocturia is not simply a consequence of lower urinary tract disease; rather, it is a multifactorial disorder that is often a manifestation of an underlying renal or systemic disease. Through the use of the frequency volume chart, clinicians can accurately quantify nocturia and determine its aetiology. Evaluation of quality of life and sleep using simple measures is essential in order to assess the impact of nocturia on a patient. Numerous treatment options for nocturia exist, but most are associated with minor benefit or lack sufficient evidence supporting their use. By systematically analysing an individual's causes of nocturia, clinicians can design appropriate treatment strategies to most effectively treat this condition.

Nocturia in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: evaluating the significance of ageing, co-morbid illnesses, lifestyle and medical therapy in treatment outcome in real life practice

AIM

The aim of study was to evaluate the influence of ageing, lifestyle, and co morbid illnesses on treatment outcome of nocturia among men with BPH.

METHODS

Patients with BPH on medical therapy of least 6 months and up to 48 months were interviewed. Nocturia episodes, co morbid illnesses, beverage intake frequency, medications and work history were documented. Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), prostate volume, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were recorded. Treatment failure is defined as persistent nocturia despite on medical therapy for BPH.

RESULTS

In 156 patients, the prevalence of nocturia was 96.7% while nocturia of 2 or more was 85.9%. Factors associated with treatment failure was older age (p < 0.01), usage of diuretics (p = 0.03), and antimuscarinics (p < 0.01), while active working status (p < 0.01), use of desmopression (p = 0.01), and increased coffee intake (p = 0.02) were associated with nocturia improvement. Co-morbid illnesses, obesity, WC, alcohol intake, PSA, prostate volume, and use of BPH medical therapy did not influence treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

Advancing age has a significance negative outcome on nocturia treatment, while standard BPH medical therapy and co morbid illnesses have an insignificant impact. However, alleviation of bothersome symptoms is possible with the understanding of its patho-physiology and individual-based approach to treatment and expected outcome.

Combination therapies for the management of nocturia and its comorbidities

Nocturia is the most bothersome lower urinary tract symptom. It has a multifactorial etiology. It had been thought nocturia was a nonspecific symptom of lower urinary system dysfunction, but it has been determined that many diseases, related to different organ systems, might be reasons for this nonspecific symptom. Along with the importance of systemic diseases that cause nocturia, the symptom itself has adverse effects on patients’ health and quality of life. There are several studies reporting a direct relationship between nocturia and depression, cognitive dysfunction, mood disturbances, falls, and fractures. For this reason, it is important to treat nocturia both to increase quality of life and to decrease related complications. Treatment opportunities have been under investigation for 20 years. Most of the studies in the literature have reported the results of single-drug medication on nocturia, which may be insufficient for a situation that has such a multifactorial etiology. In this review, we evaluated the success of different treatment combinations on nocturia.

Management of nocturia: the role of antidiuretic pharmacotherapy

Strategies to manage nocturia include lifestyle modifications and treatment with alpha-blockers, antimuscarinic therapies, and antidiuretics. The concept of achieving success should not be limited to reduction of nighttime voids; it should ideally include proof of improvement of conditions generally associated with nocturia, such as falls, quality of life, and overall health. Few studies have looked specifically at parameters other than nocturnal voids, such as sleep latency, first undisturbed sleep period (FUSP), and total sleep time, including their clinical relevance to patient well-being. Lifestyle modifications, such as voiding before bedtime, limiting caffeine and alcohol, and adjusting medication timing, may be initially effective in mild cases of nocturia. Statistically significant reductions in voiding have been reported with antimuscarinic agents and alpha-blockers as initial therapy, but these reductions generally are not clinically relevant. The antidiuretic therapy desmopressin acetate, a selective vasopressin receptor 2 agonist, is effective in adults with nocturia associated with nocturnal polyuria; however, hyponatremia can occur. The newest formulation-desmopressin orally disintegrating sublingual tablet (ODST)--has greater bioavailability; thus, lower doses can be used, potentially reducing hyponatremia risk. A phase 3 study demonstrated statistically significant reductions in nocturnal voids for desmopressin ODST 50 and 100 µg versus placebo (-1.18 and -1.43 vs. -0.86; P = 0.02 and P < 0.0001, respectively) in patients with nocturia. Treatment was well-tolerated, and low-dose desmopressin ODST was associated with statistically significant increases in duration of FUSP. Development of a validated composite endpoint may help clinicians identify and compare strategies for treating nocturia.

Medication adherence in the management of nocturia: challenges and solutions

OBJECTIVE

Nocturia affects millions of men and women. No prior reviews or meta-analyses have explored the issue of adherence in nocturia patients. The objective of our study was to examine the attributes and their interaction that might impact pharmacological adherence in nocturia care using a conceptual model of adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of the Medline, PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases for studies published between January 1990 and June 2014 was conducted. We developed a conceptual model in order to facilitate our review.

RESULTS

Currently, multiple treatment options for nocturia exist, depending on the underlying cause. Adherence to nocturia treatment and outcomes are complex and intertwined, and nonadherence to nocturia treatment is common. In 15 studies meeting eligibility criteria, behavioral and pharmacologic interventions for nocturia were associated with reduced nocturia symptoms. Urinary symptoms that are associated with nocturia need individualized management depending on renal and hepatic function, medical comorbidities, and ongoing medication use in a patient. Another important factor related to adherence is the bother. Although nocturia is defined as nighttime-voiding frequency of one or more, not all persons may find this bothersome. The degree of bother is subjective, and may change from person to person. However, there is no information related to the association between bother and adherence to medication or behavioral treatments for nocturia. Medication dosing convenience, preference, and cost play important roles in adherence. We present a patient-centered conceptual model that brings together the various dimensions of medication adherence for nocturia.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have explored adherence to medication and related factors in the care of nocturia. Our conceptual model can aid development of interventions to improve adherence to nocturia medications.

The impact of adding low-dose oral desmopressin therapy to tamsulosin therapy for treatment of nocturia owing to benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding a low-dose oral desmopressin to tamsulosin therapy for treatment of nocturia in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Eligible patients with BPH and nocturia ≥2/night were randomly allocated to two treatment groups; the first of which received 3-month treatment scheme of daily oral dose of tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg and desmopressin MELT 60 mcg (D/T group), while the second one received tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg only (T group). Patients were followed on monthly basis and changes in the parameters from baseline to 3 months after treatment were assessed on I-PSS/QoL questionnaire, 7-day voiding diary, urinalysis, serum sodium, abdominal ultrasonography and uroflowmetry.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients were included within the study; 123 patients in the combined D/T group and 125 patients in T group. The frequencies of night voids decreased by 64.3% in D/T group compared to 44.6% in T group. The first sleep period, significantly increased from 82.1 to 160.0 min and from 83.2 to 123.8 min in D/T and T group, respectively; and significant differences between both groups were observed at the end of study (p < 0.001). I-PSS, QoL score, post-void residual urine volume and Q max were significantly improved with no statistical difference between both groups. No serious adverse effects were reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of low-dose oral desmopressin therapy to an α-blocker tamsulosin provides effective treatment for nocturia in patients with LUTS/BPH.

Impact of dutasteride on nocturia in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): a pooled analysis of three phase III studies

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of dutasteride compared with placebo on nocturia in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia, using pooled data from dutasteride phase III studies.

METHODS

Nocturia was assessed using Question 7 of the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire. Efficacy measures included: mean change in nocturia at 24 months; proportion of patients with improvement/worsening in nocturia; nocturnal voiding frequency at baseline and study end, overall and by baseline subgroups; and nocturnal voiding frequency <2 at study end in patients with baseline score ≥ 2.

RESULTS

In total, 4,321 patients with a mean age of 66 years were evaluated. From month 12 onwards, mean nocturia improvements were significantly superior with dutasteride than with placebo (p ≤ 0.05). Reduction in nocturia was significantly better with dutasteride than with placebo across all baseline subgroups tested (p ≤ 0.05). Also at month 24, dutasteride therapy resulted in a greater proportion of subjects with nocturia improvement compared with placebo (p ≤ 0.05), with the largest treatment group differences in subjects with a baseline nocturia score of 2 or 3. Among patients with significant nocturia at baseline (score ≥ 2), significantly more subjects with dutasteride versus placebo had a score <2 at month 24 (26 vs. 19 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After 24 months of treatment, dutasteride treatment provided significantly greater improvements in nocturia, and less worsening, compared with placebo, primarily in subjects with two or three nocturia episodes per night. Studies specifically designed to assess nocturia are required to prospectively confirm these findings.

Etiology, evaluation, and management of nocturia in elderly men and women

One of the most common problems affecting both elderly men and women is nocturia. Not only is nocturia a quality-of-life complaint, but the condition also is associated with increased morbidity and even mortality. Elderly people with nocturia are more at risk for hip fractures, resulting in an increased mortality. Nocturia can also be a harbinger of underlying disease states that can certainly affect a man or woman's quality of life in addition to the morbidity and mortality of those who suffer from this common medical problem. This article discusses the causes of nocturia, the evaluation, and the treatment options available for managing this common medical complaint that affects so many elderly patients.

Nocturia improvement in the combination of Avodart(®) and tamsulosin (CombAT) study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of dutasteride plus tamsulosin combination therapy, compared with dutasteride or tamsulosin monotherapy, on nocturia in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) using data from the 4-year CombAT study.

METHODS

Nocturia was assessed using Question 7 of the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire. Efficacy measures included as follows: mean change in nocturia at 3-month intervals up to 48 months; proportion of patients with improvement/worsening in nocturia; nocturnal voiding frequency at baseline and study end, overall and by baseline subgroups; and nocturnal voiding frequency <2 at study end in patients with a baseline score ≥ 2.

RESULTS

In total, 4,722 patients with a mean age of 66 years were included. Mean nocturia improvements were significantly superior (p ≤ 0.01) with combination therapy than with either monotherapy (adjusted mean change from baseline in IPSS Question 7 score at month 48: combination therapy -0.5, dutasteride -0.4, tamsulosin -0.3). Reduction in nocturia score with combination therapy was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) better than tamsulosin monotherapy across all baseline subgroups tested, except for men with previous 5ARI use. Among those with a baseline IPSS Q7 score ≥ 2, more patients with combination therapy had a score <2 at month 48 (34 %) compared with dutasteride (30 %, p = 0.018) or tamsulosin (26 %, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy provided greater improvements and less worsening of nocturia compared with both dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapies. These analyses are the first to show greater improvement with a 5ARI/α-blocker combination versus either agent alone for the management of nocturia in patients with LUTS/BPH.

A retrospective study of clinical outcomes of α-blocker or finasteride monotherapy followed by combination therapy: determination of the period of combination therapy of α-blocker and finasteride

AIMS

We investigated outcomes after discontinuing alpha-blockers or finasteride in patients who initially received combination therapy and compared differences by duration of combination therapy.

METHODS

Patients with international prostate symptom score ≥ 8, serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) < 4 ng/ml, prostate volume > 25 cm(3) and combination therapy of alpha-blockers and finasteride for more than 6 months were classified into three groups. Group 1 continued combination therapy; group 2, alpha-blockers monotherapy; and group 3, finasteride monotherapy. All parameters were evaluated before and after changing to monotherapy. Patients who received combination therapy for 6-9 months and those who received combination therapy for longer were comparatively analysed.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 106 patients was 66.9 ± 7.8 years. No significant differences in baseline symptom scores, PSA or prostate volume were found. Following combination therapy, symptom scores, and quality of life (QoL) decreased for all groups. Group 1 maintained decreased PSA and prostate volume, and improved uroflowmetric profiles. No differences in uroflowmetric parameters were found after 6 months. Group 2 maintained improved symptoms, QoL and uroflowmetric profiles, although PSA and prostate volume returned to baseline. Group 3 maintained lowered PSA and prostate volume, whereas Qmax returned to baseline. QoL scores showed no change. Patients who received combination therapy for ≥9 months improved more in symptoms and QoL than those who received shorter combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of alpha-blockers or finasteride after combination therapy for ≥ 6 months maintained improvements in symptoms. The appropriate period of combination therapy was ≥ 9 months.

Systematic review of combination drug therapy for non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms

BACKGROUND

Several drugs are approved for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, but these are mostly used by clinicians as monotherapies. The combination of different compounds, each of which targets a different aspect of LUTS, seems appealing. However, only few clinical trials have evaluated the effects of combination therapies.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male LUTS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Cochrane databases were used to identify clinical trials and meta-analyses on male LUTS combination therapy. The search was restricted to studies of level of evidence ≥ 1b. A total of 49 papers published between January 1988 and March 2012 were identified.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The α1-adrenoceptor antagonist (α1-blocker)/5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) combination provides the most data. This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables in patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when treatment is maintained for >1 yr; when given for <1 yr, α1-blockers alone are just as effective. The combination of α1-blocker/5-ARI shows a slightly increased rate of adverse events. It remains unknown whether its safety and superiority over either drug as monotherapy are sustained after >6 yr. The α1-blocker/muscarinic receptor antagonist (antimuscarinic) combination was most frequently assessed as an add-on therapy to already existing α1-blocker therapy. Inconsistent data derive from heterogeneous study populations and different study designs. Currently, the α1-blocker/antimuscarinic combination appears to be a second-line add-on for patients with insufficient symptom relief after monotherapy. The combination seems to be safe in men with postvoid residual <200 ml. However, there are no trials >4 mo concerning safety and efficacy of this combination. The α1-blocker/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination is a new treatment option with only preliminary reports. More studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

An α1-blocker/5-ARI combination is beneficial for patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when medical treatment is intended for >1 yr. Based on short-term follow-up studies, add-on of antimuscarinics to α1-blockers is an option when postvoid residual is <200 ml.

Nocturia: current concepts and future perspectives

Nocturia is a prevalent highly bothersome urinary symptom that may significantly detriment the health and well-being of sufferers. It is characterized by waking at night to void, each void preceded and followed by sleep, hence leading to fragmentation of sleep and day-time tiredness. This may result in reduced productivity in the workplace, which contributes to the significant burden to the wider society that nocturia incurs. Nocturia was traditionally viewed as one of the many urinary tract symptoms that occur due to lower urinary tract dysfunction. However, recently it has been recognized that due to its multi-factorial aetio-pathogenesis, nocturia should be viewed as distinct clinical condition in its own right. Careful assessment of the nocturic patient is essential so that treatment strategies are guided by the likely causes. Much research is currently being undertaken into the underlying causes and the optimal management approaches. This review will explore the contemporary status of research on nocturia with a focus on the current and newly available pharmacotherapies.

The dilemma of nocturia

Patients with nocturia are often referred to urologists, but the underlying cause most often lies outside the urinary tract. Nocturia should be considered a systemic disorder and investigated and treated as such. Comprehensive assessment of the symptoms, optimally including a frequency volume chart, can help to determine the potential underlying cause and help to direct the patient to the most suitable medical professional for further management.

The role of nocturia in the quality of life of men with lower urinary tract symptoms

OBJECTIVES

To determine the role of treatment-associated improvement in nocturia in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and secondarily to confirm the role of nocturia in HRQL at baseline and to compare the effects of watchful waiting, transurethral microwave treatment (TUMT) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to those of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists (α-blockers) on nocturia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed using multiple regression a large single-centre database of patients receiving routine care for treatment-associated alterations of symptoms and HRQL (assessed at baseline, 2611 men) and 6-12 months after initiation of treatment (1258 men).

RESULTS

Among the symptoms assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score, nocturia (together with urgency and weak stream) had the strongest correlation with HRQL at baseline and after treatment. Watchful waiting, α-blockers, TUMT and TURP reduced nocturia episodes by a mean (sd) of 7 (53)%, 17 (40)%, 32 (47)% and 75 (23)%, respectively. The treatment-associated improvements in nocturia (together with those of weak stream) had the strongest association with those of HRQL.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that among all LUTS assessed in the IPSS, nocturia has one of the strongest associations with HRQL, and that treatment-associated improvements in nocturia contribute considerably to overall improvements in HRQL.

Nocturia in older men

Nocturia is a common and bothersome symptom that impacts on sleep-quality and quality of life. Nocturia often has a multi-factorial etiology which makes thorough assessment of the complaint indispensable. This review summarizes the definition of nocturia, its epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostics, and treatment options with special reference to older men. Nocturia is defined as a nocturnal voiding frequency of two or more, based on impact on quality of life. It is very prevalent in older men. Apart from the negative effects of sleep-disruption, it may be a risk-factor for hip fractures and increased mortality. Most common causes are: nocturnal polyuria, 24-h polyuria, overactive bladder (sometimes due to BPH) and sleep disturbance. A clear understanding of the etiology in the individual patient is indispensable when addressing the various possible causes and co-morbidities. Most important tool for this is the frequency-volume chart, but also patient history, physical examination and serum analysis. For treatment, lifestyle adjustments are often helpful. Medical therapy with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, alpha-blockers, a combination of the two, or anti-muscarinics, has a limited effect. Most important medical option is desmopressin (arginine vasopressin analogue); however, treatment with this drug is limited to men under 65 years mainly due to the risk of hyponatraemia.

Excessive nocturnal urine production is a major contributing factor to the etiology of nocturia

PURPOSE

Nocturnal polyuria is a common but often overlooked cause of nocturia. We investigated the proportion of adults with 2 or greater voids nightly who had nocturnal polyuria in 2 cohorts from the United States and Europe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on nocturnal polyuria were obtained from 3 or 7-day frequency-volume charts completed by patients as part of screening for inclusion in subsequent trials of nocturia therapy. Patients recorded the time and volume of each void. Nocturnal polyuria was defined as nocturnal urine volume greater than 33% of 24-hour volume, including the first morning void.

RESULTS

In the first cohort 1,003 patients were screened, of whom 846 provided evaluable diary data, including 641 (76%) with nocturnal polyuria. Of the total screened population of 1,003 patients 641 (64%) had confirmed nocturnal polyuria. The prevalence of nocturnal polyuria increased with age but was high in all age groups. In the second cohort 1,412 patients were screened, of whom 917 provided evaluable diary data, including 806 (88%) with nocturnal polyuria. Of the total screened population of 1,412 patients 806 (57%) had confirmed nocturnal polyuria. The prevalence of nocturnal polyuria increased with age but was high in all age groups. Of 158 patients receiving benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or overactive bladder medication 141 (89%) had nocturnal polyuria. In each cohort the nocturnal polyuria prevalence was high in all ethnic groups (63% or greater).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large study nocturnal polyuria was present in most patients with nocturia regardless of gender, age, ethnicity, country and concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia/overactive bladder therapy.

Nocturia: new directions

The Nocturia Think Tank (TT) met during the 2010 meeting of the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society to discuss present knowledge and future directions in care and research of this prominent component of the spectrum of lower urinary tract symptoms. Questions raised included whether nocturia should be re-defined as a function of its bother, effects on quality of life, and economic impact upon society. At issue is the need to delineate the determinants of successful nocturia management. The multifactorial nature of nocturia requires that progress in its treatment will be dependent upon the cooperative investigation on the part of urologists, urogynecologists, geriatricians, epidemiologists, medical economists and pharma. Areas for future avenues of research were outlined at the conclusion of the meeting.