Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral prostate cancer on extended prostate biopsy: predictive accuracy of laterality and implications for hemi-ablative therapy

Biopsy-Integrated 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Prostate Cancer and Its Application for Gleason Grade and Tumor Laterality Assessment

CONTEXT.—

Grade Group assessed using Gleason combined score and tumor extent is a main determinant for risk stratification and therapeutic planning of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop a 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model regarding Grade Group and tumor extent in collaboration with uroradiologists and uropathologists for optimal treatment planning for prostate cancer.

DESIGN.—

We studied the data from 83 patients with prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI and subsequent MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and radical prostatectomy. A 3-dimensional MRI model was constructed by integrating topographic information of MRI-based segmented lesions, biopsy paths, and histopathologic information of biopsy specimens. The multiparametric MRI-integrated Grade Group and laterality were assessed by using the 3-dimensional MRI model and compared with the radical prostatectomy specimen.

RESULTS.—

The MRI-defined index tumor was concordant with radical prostatectomy in 94.7% (72 of 76) of cases. The multiparametric MRI-integrated Grade Group revealed the highest agreement (weighted κ, 0.545) and a significantly higher concordance rate (57.9%) than the targeted (47.8%, P = .008) and systematic (39.4%, P = .01) biopsies. The multiparametric MRI-integrated Grade Group showed significantly less downgrading rates than the combined biopsy (P = .001), without significant differences in upgrading rate (P = .06). The 3-dimensional multiparametric MRI model estimated tumor laterality in 66.2% (55 of 83) of cases, and contralateral clinically significant cancer was missed in 9.6% (8 of 83) of cases. The tumor length measured by multiparametric MRI best correlated with radical prostatectomy as compared with the biopsy-defined length.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The 3-dimensional model incorporating MRI and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy information easily recognized the spatial distribution of MRI-visible and MRI-nonvisible cancer and provided better Grade Group correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens but still requires validation.

Integrity of the Urethral Sphincter Complex, Nerve-sparing, and Long-term Continence Status after Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

The applicability of the sphincter complex integral theory to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unclear, with little known about the long-term effect of sphincter complex integrity on continence.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the preoperative anatomical and functional features of the sphincter complex and the degree of nerve-sparing affect long-term continence after RARP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective study of 529 patients who underwent RARP at a single tertiary center.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Anatomical factors, including membranous urethral length (MUL) and pelvic diaphragm length (PDL), were assessed using sagittal views of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. MUL was defined as the distance from the posterior prostate apex to the urethra level at the penile bulb, and PDL was defined as the length of the urethra that met the planes created by the pelvic floor muscles. Functional parameters including maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and functional urethral length were evaluated using preoperative measurements of the urethral pressure profiles. The degree of nerve-sparing was stratified as bilateral, unilateral, or none. Continence (pad-free status) was assessed according to anatomical and functional factors and nerve-sparing. We used binary logistic regression to assess factors predicting continence return 12 mo after RARP.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Continence return rates 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after RARP were 39.7%, 66.0%, 80.2%, and 87.0%, respectively. Continence return rates at 12 mo differed significantly in patients with MUL ≥11.7mm (91.9%) and <11.7mm (79.9%), PDL ≥9.9mm (96.7%) and <9.9mm (74.5%), and MUCP ≥66 cmH₂O (89.7%) and <66 cmH₂O (79.4%). The continence return rate was significantly higher in patients with bilateral (93.0%) than in patients with unilateral (78.1%) or no (76.7%) nerve-sparing. Multivariate analysis showed that PDL (odds ratio [OR]=2.187 per mm), MUCP (OR=1.037 per cmH₂O), and bilateral nerve-sparing (OR=3.671) were independently associated with continence return 12 mo after RALP.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical length and static pressure of the sphincter complex affected continence after RARP. Bilateral nerve-sparing was independently associated with long-term continence.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Predisposing length and static pressure of the urinary sphincter affect continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Nerve bundle preservation during surgery enhances postoperative return of continence.

Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers

The numbers of patients diagnosed with prostate cancers is increasing due to the widespread application of prostate-specific antigen screening and subsequent prostate biopsies. The methods of systemic administration of therapeutics are not target-specific and thus cannot efficiently destroy prostate tumour cells while simultaneously sparing the surrounding normal tissues and organs. Recent advances in imaging-guided minimally invasive therapeutic techniques offer considerable potential for the effective management of prostate cancers. An objective understanding of the feasibility, effectiveness, morbidity, and deficiencies of these interventional techniques is essential for both clinical practice and scientific progress. This review presents the recent advances in imaging-guided interventional techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancers.

Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) of the prostate and MR-guided prostate biopsy, and their role in the evaluation and management of men with low-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

We performed a literature review based on the MEDLINE database search for publications on the role of mMRI (a) in detection and localization of prostate cancer, prediction of tumor aggressiveness and progression and (b) in guiding targeted prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

The mMRI, particularly diffusion-weighted imaging with T2-weighted imaging, is a useful tool for tumor localization in low-risk prostate cancer as it can detect lesions that are more likely missed on extended biopsy schemes and can identify clinically significant disease requiring definitive treatment. The MR-guided biopsy of the most suspicious lesions enables more accurate and safer approach to guide enrollment into the active surveillance program. However, the MR-guided biopsy is complex. The fusion of MRI data with transrectal ultrasound for the purpose of biopsy provides a more feasible technique with documented accurate sampling.

CONCLUSION

Although the mMRI is not routinely used for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in prostate cancer, it can provide valuable information to guide management of men with low-risk disease. Incorporation of mMRI into the workup and monitoring of patients with low-risk prostate cancer can help discriminate clinically significant disease from indolent disease. Targeted biopsy of MR-suspicious lesions enables accurate sampling of potentially aggressive tumors that may affect outcomes.

Ability of preoperative 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging to predict the absence of side-specific extracapsular extension of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have shown an improvement in prostate cancer diagnosis with the use of 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. We retrospectively assessed the ability of this imaging technique to predict side-specific extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.

METHODS

From October 2007 to August 2011, prostatectomy was carried out in 396 patients after preoperative 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Among these, 132 (primary sample) and 134 patients (validation sample) underwent 12-core prostate biopsy at the National Cancer Center Hospital of Tokyo, Japan, and at other institutions, respectively. In the primary dataset, univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to predict side-specific extracapsular extension using variables determined preoperatively, including 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging findings (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging). A prediction model was then constructed and applied to the validation study sample.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified four significant independent predictors (P < 0.05), including a biopsy Gleason score of ≥8, positive 3.0-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging findings, ≥2 positive biopsy cores on each side and a maximum percentage of positive cores ≥31% on each side. The negative predictive value was 93.9% in the combination model with these four predictors, meanwhile the positive predictive value was 33.8%. Good reproducibility of these four significant predictors and the combination model was observed in the validation study sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The side-specific extracapsular extension prediction by the biopsy Gleason score and factors associated with tumor location, including a positive 3.0-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging finding, have a high negative predictive value, but a low positive predictive value.

Diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to estimate and compare the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with other MRI techniques including T2-weighted MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches of the PubMed and Scopus electronic databases for the terms "prostate," "cancer," "diffusion-weighted imaging," and "magnetic resonance imaging" using an end date of December 2010 were completed. All included studies had histopathologic correlation; 2×2 contingency data were constructed for each study. A Bayesian receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model was used across studies to determine sensitivity, specificity, and area under the full or partial ROC curve.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles consisting of a total of 5892 lesions were analyzed. Based on a 95% credible interval, DWI alone yielded a significantly better area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity (0.85, 0.69, 0.89, respectively) than T2-weighted imaging alone (0.75, 0.60, 0.76). Combined DWI and T2-weighted imaging (0.73, 0.70, 0.83) showed a similar area under the ROC curve but significantly better sensitivity and specificity than T2-weighted imaging alone. DWI and combined DWI and T2-weighted imaging yielded similar overall sensitivity, but DWI alone showed better overall specificity than combined DWI and T2-weighted imaging. At specificities of greater than 80%, combined DWI and T2-weighted imaging yielded a partial area under the ROC curve (0.138) similar to that of DWI alone (0.129) and was significantly better than the partial area under the ROC curve of T2-weighted imaging alone (0.070). DWI alone and combined DWI and T2-weighted imaging appear to be superior to dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging alone (area under the ROC curve, 0.79; sensitivity, 0.58; specificity, 0.82).

CONCLUSION

DWI appears to improve diagnostic performance and can be a useful adjunct to conventional anatomic imaging for identifying tumor foci in prostate cancer.

Discrepancy in prostate cancer localization between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in patients with unilateral positive biopsy: implications for focal therapy

BACKGROUND

Unilateral ablative strategy success depends on reliable prediction of prostate cancer (PCA) location. We evaluated the discrepancy in PCA localization between unilateral positive biopsy (PBx) and radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, 431 patients were diagnosed with unilateral PCA by 12-core PBx; 179 underwent RP and constituted our study cohort. Specimens were reviewed to map tumor outline and determine number of cancer foci, tumor volume, Gleason score (GS), zone of origin, localization, and pathologic stage.

RESULTS

In 50 men, biopsy and prostatectomy findings correlated (unilateral tumor); in 129, PCA was detected in the contralateral side of the prostate. In 52 patients, 54 clinically significant tumors were missed by biopsy. When patients with true unilateral and missed contralateral disease at RP were compared with respect to prognostic parameters no significant differences were detected. Sixty-one of the 88 patients with preoperative low-risk disease had true unilateral (n = 21) or missed insignificant contralateral (n = 40) PCA; 27 had missed significant contralateral PCA at RP. PSA > 4 ng/ml predicted presence of significant bilateral disease in low-risk population (P = 0.004). Twenty-four of 27 patients with significant bilateral cancer had PSA > 4, although 33/61 with unilateral or bilateral insignificant cancer had similar elevated PSA values.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve-core biopsy is inadequate to identify candidates for organ-sparing therapy. Most men with unilateral positive biopsies have bilateral cancer at prostatectomy. Tumors missed by biopsy were clinically significant in 40% of patients, but no prognostic parameters could predict unilateral disease. Hemi-ablative treatment might fail to eradicate significant lesions in the contralateral side.