1
|
Acosta-Vega NL, Varela R, Mesa JA, Garai J, Gómez-Gutiérrez A, Serrano-Gómez SJ, Zabaleta J, Sanabria-Salas MC, Combita AL. Genetic ancestry and radical prostatectomy findings in Hispanic/Latino patients. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338250. [PMID: 38634046 PMCID: PMC11021589 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background African ancestry is a known factor associated with the presentation and aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PC). Hispanic/Latino populations exhibit varying degrees of genetic admixture across Latin American countries, leading to diverse levels of African ancestry. However, it remains unclear whether genetic ancestry plays a role in the aggressiveness of PC in Hispanic/Latino patients. We explored the associations between genetic ancestry and the clinicopathological data in Hispanic/Latino PC patients from Colombia. Patients and methods We estimated the European, Indigenous and African genetic ancestry, of 230 Colombian patients with localized/regionally advanced PC through a validated panel for genotypification of 106 Ancestry Informative Markers. We examined the associations of the genetic ancestry components with the Gleason Grade Groups (GG) and the clinicopathological characteristics. Results No association was observed between the genetic ancestry with the biochemical recurrence or Gleason GG; however, in a two groups comparison, there were statistically significant differences between GG3 and GG4/GG5 for European ancestry, with a higher mean ancestry proportion in GG4/GG5. A lower risk of being diagnosed at an advanced age was observed for patients with high African ancestry than those with low African ancestry patients (OR: 0.96, CI: 0.92-0.99, p=0.03). Conclusion Our findings revealed an increased risk of presentation of PC at an earlier age in patients with higher African ancestry compared to patients with lower African ancestry in our Hispanic/Latino patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia L. Acosta-Vega
- Grupo de Investigación en Biología del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
- Programa de doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Rodolfo Varela
- Departamento de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
- Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Jorge Andrés Mesa
- Departamento de Patología Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Jone Garai
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Alberto Gómez-Gutiérrez
- Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Silvia J. Serrano-Gómez
- Grupo de Investigación en Biología del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Jovanny Zabaleta
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
- Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - María Carolina Sanabria-Salas
- Grupo de Investigación en Biología del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Alba L. Combita
- Grupo de Investigación en Biología del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
- Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen X, Li W, Yang J, Huang C, Zhou C, Chen Y, Lin Y, Hou J, Huang Y, Wei X. Extracapsular extension of transitional zone prostate cancer miss-detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:6943-6952. [PMID: 36847840 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04573-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate the importance of extracapsular extension (ECE) of transitional zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa), examine the causes of its missed detection by Mp-MRI, and develop a new predictive model by integrating multi-level clinical variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 304 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 12 + X needle transperineal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy from 2018 to 2021 in our center was performed. RESULTS In this study, the incidence rates of ECE were similar in patients with MRI lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) and TZ (P = 0.66). However, the missed detection rate was higher in patients with TZ lesions than in those with PZ lesions (P < 0.05). These missed detections result in a higher positive surgical margin rate (P < 0.05). In patients with TZ lesions, detected MP-MRI ECE may have grey areas: the longest diameters of the MRI lesions were 16.5-23.5 mm; MRI lesion volumes were 0.63-2.51 ml; MRI lesion volume ratios were 2.75-8.86%; PSA were 13.85-23.05 ng/ml. LASSO regression was used to construct a clinical prediction model for predicting the risk of ECE in TZ lesions from the perspective of MRI and clinical features, including four variables: the longest diameter of MRI lesions, TZ pseudocapsule invasion, ISUP grading of biopsy pathology, and number of positive biopsy needles. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MRI lesions in the TZ have the same incidence of ECE as those with lesions in the PZ, but a higher missed detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiajian Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenchao Zhou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongchang Chen
- Department of Urology, Changshu No. 2 People's Hospital, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuxin Lin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianquan Hou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Urology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yuhua Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xuedong Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan GH, Deniffel D, Finelli A, Wettstein M, Ahmad A, Zlotta A, Fleshner N, Hamilton R, Kulkarni G, Nason G, Ajib K, Herrera-Caceres J, Chandrasekar T, Perlis N. Validating the total cancer location density metric for stratifying patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer at higher risk of grade group reclassification while on active surveillance. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:146.e23-146.e28. [PMID: 36639336 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate a previously proposed prognostic metric, Total Cancer Location (TCLo) density, in a contemporary cohort of men with grade group (GG) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS). METHODS We evaluated 123 patients who entered AS with maximum GG1 PCa at diagnostic and/or confirmatory biopsy. TCLo was defined as the total number of PCa locations identified on both biopsy sessions. TCLo density was calculated as TCLo / prostate volume [ml]. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from confirmatory biopsy to grade group reclassification (GGR) on repeat biopsy or prostatectomy. Optimal cut-point for TCLo density was predefined in a previously reported cohort and applied to this contemporary cohort. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to estimate the association of predictors with PFS. RESULTS During median follow-up of 7.8 years, (IQR 7.3-8.2) 34 men had GGR. Using previously defined cut-points, PFS at 5-years was 60% (95% CI: 44%-81%) vs. 89% (95% CI: 83%-96%) in men with high (≥0.06 ml-1) vs. low (<0.06 ml-1) TCLo density, and 63% (95% CI: 48%-82%) vs. 90% (95% CI: 83%-96%) in men with high (≥3) vs. low (≤2) TCLo (log-rank test: P < 0.0001, respectively). Adjusting for age, prostate volume, percent of positive cores and PSA, both higher TCLo density (HR [per 0.01 ml-1 increase]: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05-1.33, P = 0.005) and TCLo (HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.20-2.38, P = 0.002) were associated with shorter PFS. CONCLUSION The previously suggested prognostic value of TCLo density was confirmed in this validation cohort. TCLo alone performed similarly well. Patients with high TCLo density (≥0.06 ml-1) or TCLo (>2) were at greater risk of GGR while on AS. With external validation, these metric may help guide risk-adapted surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan Hee Tan
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Sunway Medical Centre, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Dominik Deniffel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marian Wettstein
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ardalan Ahmad
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Zlotta
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Urology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Hamilton
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Girish Kulkarni
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory Nason
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Khaled Ajib
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaime Herrera-Caceres
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Nathan Perlis
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramaswamy A, Proudfoot JA, Ross AE, Davicioni E, Schaeffer EM, Hu JC. Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume and Genomic Risk. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 48:90-97. [PMID: 36743402 PMCID: PMC9895765 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the historic association of higher prostate cancer volume with worse oncologic outcomes, little is known about the impact of tumor volume on cancer biology. Objective To characterize the relationship between tumor volume (measured by percent positive cores [PPC]) and cancer biology (measured by Decipher genomic risk classifier [GC]) in men who underwent prostate biopsy. Design setting and participants Prostate biopsies from 52 272 men profiled with Decipher captured in a population-based prospective tumor registry were collected from 2016 to 2021. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The degree of distribution and correlation of PPC with a GC score across grade group (GG) strata were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multivariable linear regression controlled for clinicopathologic characteristics. Results and limitations A total of 38 921 (74%) biopsies passed quality control (14 331 GG1, 16 159 GG2, 5661 GG3, 1775 GG4, and 995 GG5). Median PPC and GC increased with sequentially higher GG. There was an increasingly positive correlation (r) between PPC and GC in GG2-5 prostate cancer (r [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.07 [0.5, 0.8] in GG2, 0.15 [0.12, 0.17] in GG3, 0.20 [0.15, 0.24] in GG4, and 0.25 [0.19, 0.31] in GG5), with no correlation in GG1 disease (r = 0.01, 95% CI [-0.001, 0.03]). In multivariable linear regression, GC was significantly associated with higher PPC for GG2-5 (all p < 0.05) but was not significantly associated with PPC for GG1. Limitations include retrospective design and a lack of final pathology from radical prostatectomy specimens. Conclusions Higher tumor volume was associated with worse GC for GG2-5 prostate cancer, whereas tumor volume was not associated with worse GC for GG1 disease. The finding that tumor volume is not associated with worse cancer biology in GG1 disease encourages active surveillance for most patients irrespective of tumor volume. Patient summary We studied the relationship between prostate cancer tumor volume and cancer biology, as measured by the Decipher genomic risk score, in men who underwent prostate biopsy. We found that tumor volume was not associated with worse cancer biology for low-grade prostate cancer. Our findings reassuringly support recent guidelines to recommend active surveillance for grade group 1 prostate cancer in most patients, irrespective of tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Ramaswamy
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ashley E. Ross
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Edward M. Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA,Corresponding author. 525 East 68th Street Starr 946, New York, NY 10065, USA. Tel. +1 (646) 962-9600; Fax: +1 (646) 962-0715.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Awasthi S, Mahal BA, Park JY, Creed JH, Williams VL, Elkenawi A, Meadows SO, Pow-Sang JM, Lu-Yao G, Kelly WK, Lang DLY, Zgibor J, Rebbeck TR, Yamoah K. Substantial Gleason reclassification in Black men with national comprehensive cancer network low-risk prostate cancer - A propensity score analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:547-552. [PMID: 35194179 PMCID: PMC9838824 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00510-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence suggests that a subset of Black men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may harbor high volume and genomically aggressive disease. However, limited, and ambiguous research exist to evaluate the risk of extreme Gleason reclassification in Black men with low-risk PCa. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 45,674 low-risk PCa patients who underwent prostatectomy and were not on active surveillance, from National Cancer Database (NCDB). A propensity score matched-pair design was employed, and the final cohort was limited to 1:1 matched 12,340 patients. Gleason score reclassification was used as primary endpoint. As such, any migration to pathologic Gleason score ≥7(3 + 4) was identified as overall, whereas migration to ≥7(4 + 3) was defined as extreme reclassification. A conditional Poisson regression model was used to estimate the risk of reclassification. Whereas spline model was used to estimate the impact of increasing time to treatment as a non-linear function on Gleason reclassification between race group. RESULTS Upon matching there were no differences in the baseline characteristics between race groups. In a matched cohort, higher proportion of low-risk Black men (6.6%) reported extreme reclassification to pathologic Gleason score than White men (5.0%), p < 0.001. In a conditional Poisson regression model adjusted for time to treatment, the risk of overall (RR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.05-1.13, p < 0.001) and extreme (RR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.12-1.50, p = 0.004) reclassification was significantly higher in Black men as compared to their White counterpart. In spline model, the probability of Gleason reclassification in Black men was elevated with increasing time to treatment, especially after 180 days (53% vs. 43% between Black and White men). CONCLUSION Risk of Gleason score reclassification is disparately elevated in Black men with low-risk PCa. Furthermore, time to treatment can non-linearly impact Gleason reclassification in Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivanshu Awasthi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (MSOM)-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (SCCC), Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jong Y. Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jordan H. Creed
- Department of Health Informatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vonetta L. Williams
- Collaborative Data Services Core, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Asmaa Elkenawi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Julio M. Pow-Sang
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Grace Lu-Yao
- Thomas Jefferson University and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wm. Kevin Kelly
- Thomas Jefferson University and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Janice Zgibor
- College of Public Health University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department Cancer Epidemiology and Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Kosj Yamoah.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153558. [PMID: 35892817 PMCID: PMC9332009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the consequences of delaying radical prostatectomy (RP) after Active Surveillance (AS) according to stringent or wider entry criteria. We investigated the association between inclusion criteria and rates, and timing of adverse pathological findings (APFs) among patients in GAP3 cohorts. Methods: APFs (GG ≥ 3, pT ≥ 3, pN > 0 and positive surgical margins [R1]) were accounted for in very low-risk (VLR: grade group [GG] 1, cT1, positive cores < 3, PSA < 10 ng/mL, PSA density [PSAD] < 0.15 ng/mL/cm3) and low-risk (LR: GG1, cT1-2, PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL) patients undergoing subsequent RP. The Kaplan−Meier method and log−rank test analyzed APF-free survival. Stratified mixed effects models analyzed association. Results: Out of 21,169 patients on AS, 1742 (VLR: 721; LR: 1021) underwent delayed RP. Most (60.8%) did not have APFs. APFs occurred more frequently (44.6% vs. 31.7%; OR 1.54, p < 0.001) and earlier (median time: 40.3 vs. 62.6 months; p < 0.001) in LR patients, and consisted of pT ≥ 3 (OR 1.47, p = 0.013) or R1 (OR 1.80, p < 0.001), but not of GG ≥ 3 or node involvement. Age (OR 1.05, p < 0.001), PSAD (OR 23.21, p = 0.003), and number of positive cores (OR 1.16, p = 0.004) were independently associated with APFs. Conclusions: AS stands as a safe option for low-risk patients, and most do not have APFs at surgery. Wider entry criteria are associated with pT3 and R1. The prognostic implications remain uncertain.
Collapse
|
7
|
Andruska N, Agabalogun T, Fischer-Valuck BW, Brenneman RJ, Huang Y, Gay HA, Michalski JM, Carmona R, Baumann BC. Assessing the impact of brachytherapy boost and androgen deprivation therapy on survival outcomes for patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:617-625. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Assessing the role of external beam radiation therapy in combination with brachytherapy versus brachytherapy alone for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:317-324. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
9
|
Yan Y, Yeon SY, Qian C, You S, Yang W. On the Road to Accurate Protein Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current Status and Future Advances. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:13537. [PMID: 34948334 PMCID: PMC8703658 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among men worldwide. Molecular biomarkers work in conjunction with existing clinicopathologic tools to help physicians decide who to biopsy, re-biopsy, treat, or re-treat. The past decade has witnessed the commercialization of multiple PC protein biomarkers with improved performance, remarkable progress in proteomic technologies for global discovery and targeted validation of novel protein biomarkers from clinical specimens, and the emergence of novel, promising PC protein biomarkers. In this review, we summarize these advances and discuss the challenges and potential solutions for identifying and validating clinically useful protein biomarkers in PC diagnosis and prognosis. The identification of multi-protein biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity, as well as their integration with clinicopathologic parameters, imaging, and other molecular biomarkers, bodes well for optimal personalized management of PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwu Yan
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (Y.Y.); (S.Y.Y.); (C.Q.); (S.Y.)
| | - Su Yeon Yeon
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (Y.Y.); (S.Y.Y.); (C.Q.); (S.Y.)
| | - Chen Qian
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (Y.Y.); (S.Y.Y.); (C.Q.); (S.Y.)
| | - Sungyong You
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (Y.Y.); (S.Y.Y.); (C.Q.); (S.Y.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (Y.Y.); (S.Y.Y.); (C.Q.); (S.Y.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guner E, Danacioglu YO, Arikan Y, Seker KG, Polat S, Baytekin HF, Simsek A. The presence of chronic inflammation in positive prostate biopsy is associated with upgrading in radical prostatectomy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2021; 93:280-284. [PMID: 34839632 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.3.280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the predictive effect of the presence of chronic prostatitis associated with prostate cancer (PCa) in prostate biopsy on Gleason score upgrade (GSU) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 295 patients who underwent open or robotic RP with a diagnosis of localized PCa following biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups with and without GSU following RP. Predictive factors affecting GSU on biopsy were determined. The impact of chronic prostatitis associated with prostate cancer on GSU was examined via logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Out of 224 patients with Gleason 3+3 scores on biopsy, 145 (64.7%) had Gleason upgrade, and 79 (35.2%) had no upgrade. Whilst comparing the two groups with and without Gleason upgrade in terms of patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, PSA density (PSAD), prostate volume (PV), neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 score, no statistically significant difference was detected. The presence of chronic prostatitis associated with PCa was higher in the patient cohort with GSU in contrast to the other group (p < 0.001). According to the univariate logistic regression analysis, the presence of chronic prostatitis was identified to be an independent marker for GSU. CONCLUSIONS Pathologists and urologists should be careful regarding the possibility of a more aggressive tumor in the presence of chronic inflammation associated with PCa because inflammation within PCa was revealed to be linked with GSU after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekrem Guner
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul.
| | - Yavuz Onur Danacioglu
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul.
| | - Yusuf Arikan
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul.
| | - Kamil Gokhan Seker
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul.
| | - Salih Polat
- Amasya University Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, Amasya.
| | - Halil Firat Baytekin
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Istanbul.
| | - Abdulmuttalip Simsek
- University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang H, Doucette C, Yang H, Bandyopadhyay S, Grossman CE, Messing EM, Chen Y. Risk of adverse pathological features for intermediate risk prostate cancer: Clinical implications for definitive radiation therapy. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253936. [PMID: 34264975 PMCID: PMC8281993 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermediate risk prostate cancer represents a largely heterogeneous group with diverse disease extent. We sought to establish rates of adverse pathological features important for radiation planning by analyzing surgical specimens from men with intermediate risk prostate cancer who underwent immediate radical prostatectomy, and to define clinical pathologic features that may predict adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 1552 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer who underwent immediate radical prostatectomy between 1/1/2005 and 12/31/2015 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included available preoperative PSA level, pathology reports of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, and radical prostatectomy. Incidences of various pathological adverse features were evaluated. Patient characteristics and clinical disease features were analyzed for their predictive values. RESULTS Fifty percent of men with high risk features (defined as PSA >10 but <20 or biopsy primary Gleason pattern of 4) had pathological upstage to T3 or higher disease. The incidence of upgrade to Gleason score of 8 or higher and the incidence of lymph node positive disease was low. Biopsy primary Gleason pattern of 4, and PSA greater than 10 but less than 20, affected adverse pathology in addition to age and percent positive biopsy cores. Older age and increased percentage of positive cores were significant risk factors of adverse pathology. CONCLUSION Our findings underscore the importance of comprehensive staging beyond PSA level, prostate biopsy, and CT/bone scan for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer proceeding with radiation in the era of highly conformal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Christopher Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Hongmei Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Sanjukta Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Craig E. Grossman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America
| | - Edward M. Messing
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nyk Ł, Tayara O, Ząbkowski T, Kryst P, Andrychowicz A, Malewski W. The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol 2021; 21:82. [PMID: 34006281 PMCID: PMC8130114 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00850-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the role of mpMRI and high PIRADS score as independent triggers in the qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy. METHODS Between January 2017 and June 2019, 494 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed in our institution, including 203 patients (41.1%) with ISUP 1 cT1c-2c PCa on biopsy. Data regarding biopsy results, digital rectal examination, PSA, mpMRI and postoperative pathological report have been retrospectively analysed. RESULTS In 183 cases (90.1%) mpMRI has been performed at least 6 weeks after biopsy. Final pathology revealed ISUP Gleason Grade Group upgrade in 62.6% of cases. PIRADS 5, PIRADS 4 and PIRADS 3 were associated with Gleason Grade Group upgrade in 70.5%, 62.8%, 48.3% of patients on final pathology, respectively. Within PIRADS 5 group, the number of upgraded cases was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS PIRADS score correlates with an upgrade on final pathology and may justify shared decision of radical treatment in patients unwilling to repeated biopsies. However, the use of PIRADS 5 score as a sole indicator for prostatectomy may result in nonnegligible overtreatment rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Nyk
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Omar Tayara
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Ząbkowski
- Department of Urology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Kryst
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Wojciech Malewski
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takeshima Y, Yamada Y, Teshima T, Fujimura T, Kakutani S, Hakozaki Y, Kimura N, Akiyama Y, Sato Y, Kawai T, Yamada D, Kume H. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:501. [PMID: 33947348 PMCID: PMC8097801 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical significance and risk factors of upgrading in the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group System in men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. METHODS A total of 583 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by systematic biopsy were treated with RARP without neoadjuvant therapy from November 2011 to December 2018. Clinicopathological data were obtained from our clinical records. ISUP grade upgrading (IGU) was defined as 'ISUP grade in prostatectomy specimen determined to be higher than that in the biopsy specimen'. Clinicopathological factors, including age, PSA, prostate volume at biopsy (PV), PSA density, clinical stage, body mass index (BMI), interval from biopsy to prostatectomy, maximum percentage of cancer involvement per core (%CI), total number of biopsy cores, percentage of cancer positive biopsy cores (%PC), and sampling density were analyzed to detect potential risk factors of IGU. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates were calculated to analyze the effect of IGU on cancer prognosis. RESULTS In univariate analysis, BMI was a positive predictor of IGU, while %CI, %PC, and sampling density were negative predictors of IGU. BMI and %PC were statistically significant predictors of IGU in multivariate analysis. For cases diagnosed as ISUP grade group 2 or higher at biopsy, there was a significant difference in BCR rates between cases with and without IGU. CONCLUSIONS The results from our cohort showed that elements of both high-grade cancer risk (such as BMI) and sampling efficiency (such as %PC) contribute to IGU. Excluding cases diagnosed as ISUP grade group 1 at biopsy, BCR-free rates were significantly worse in cases with IGU, highlighting the need for more accurate pathological diagnosis at biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Takeshima
- Division of Innovative Cancer Therapy, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Taro Teshima
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Fujimura
- Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shigenori Kakutani
- Department of Urology, Chiba Tokushukai Hospital, Funabashi-shi, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuji Hakozaki
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Akiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lacetera V, Antezza A, Papaveri A, Cappa E, Cervelli B, Gabrielloni G, Montesi M, Morcellini R, Parri G, Recanatini E, Beatrici V. MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy in men on active surveillance: Our experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 93:88-91. [PMID: 33754618 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.1.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM The upgrading or staging in men with prostate cancer (PCA) undergoing active surveillance (AS), defined as Gleason score (GS) ≥ 3+4 or more than 2 area with cancer, was investigated in our experience using the software-based fusion biopsy (FB). METHODS We selected from our database, composed of 620 biopsies, only men on AS according to criteria of John Hopkins Protocol (T1c, < 3 positive cores, GS = 3+3 = 6). Monitoring consisted of PSA measurement every 3 months, a clinical examination every 6 months, confirmatory FB within 6 months and then annual FB in all men. The suspicious MRI lesions were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification version 2. FB were performed with a transrectal elastic free-hand fusion platform. The overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate was reported. Secondary, the diagnostic role of systematic biopsies was evaluated. RESULTS We selected 56 patients on AS with mean age 67.4 years, mean PSA 6.7 ng/ml and at least one follow-up MRI-US fusion biopsy (10 had 2 or 3 follow-up biopsies). Lesions detected by MRI were: PIRADS-2 in 5, PIRADS-3 in 28, PIRADS-4 in 18 pts and PIRADS-5 in 5 patients. In each MRI lesion, FB with 2.1 ± 1.1 cores were taken with a mean total cores of 13 ± 2.4 including the systematic cores. The overall cancer detection rate was 71% (40/56): 62% (25/40) in target core and 28% (15/40) in systematic core. The overall significant cancer detection rate was 46% (26/56): 69% (18/26) in target vs 31% (8/26) in random cores. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of clinical significant cancer was 46% in men starting active surveillance, but it was more than doubled using MRI/US Target Biopsy 69% (18/26) rather than random cores (31%, 8/26). However, 1/3 of disease upgrades would have been missed if only the targeted biopsies were performed. Based on our experience, MRI/US fusion target biopsy must be associated to systematic biopsies to improve detection of significant cancer, reducing the risks of misclassification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Lacetera
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Angelo Antezza
- Università Politecnica delle Marche-Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Torrette di Ancona.
| | - Alessio Papaveri
- Università Politecnica delle Marche-Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Torrette di Ancona.
| | - Emanuele Cappa
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Bernardino Cervelli
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | | | - Michele Montesi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Roberto Morcellini
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Gianni Parri
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Emilio Recanatini
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| | - Valerio Beatrici
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Division of Urology, Pesaro.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang X, Zhang Y, Ji Z, Yang P, Tian Y. Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:18. [PMID: 33472645 PMCID: PMC7818761 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02127-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the predictive performance of age for the risk of Gleason score change and pathologic upstaging. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until May 2020. Quality of included studies was appraised utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies. The publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots and Egger's tests. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our search yielded 27 studies with moderate-to-high quality including 84296 patients with mean age of 62.1 years. From biopsy to prostatectomy, upgrading and upstaging occurred in 32.3% and 9.8% of patients, respectively. Upgrading from diagnostic biopsy to confirmatory biopsy was found in 16.8%. Older age was associated with a significant increased risk of upgrading (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.05), and similar direction of effect was found in studies focused on upgrading from diagnostic biopsy to confirmatory biopsy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08). For pathologic upstaging within older men compared with younger, the pooled odds was 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.04). CONCLUSION Thorough consideration of age in the context of effect sizes for other factors not only prompts more accurate risk stratification but also helps providers to select optimal therapies for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengguo Ji
- Department of Urology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Peiqian Yang
- Department of Urology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Urology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singh S, Patil S, Tamhankar AS, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option? Indian J Urol 2020; 36:184-190. [PMID: 33082633 PMCID: PMC7531380 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_37_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Carcinoma prostate is considered highly aggressive in Asian countries such as India. This raises an argument whether active surveillance (AS) gives a false sense of security as opposed to upfront radical prostatectomy (RP) in Indian males with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). We analyzed our prospectively maintained robot-assisted RP (RARP) database to address this question. Materials and Methods: Five hundred and sixty-seven men underwent RARP by a single surgical team from September 2013 to September 2019. Of these, 46 (8.1%) were low risk considering the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Gleason grade group and stage were compared before and after surgery to ascertain the incidence of upgrading and upstaging. Preoperative clinical and pathological characteristics were analyzed for association with the probability of upstaging and upgrading. Results: The mean age was 60.8 ± 6.8 years. Average prostate-specific antigen level was 6.7 ± 2.0 ng/mL. 40 (86.9%) patients had a T1 stage disease and 6 (13%) patients were clinically in T2a stage. A total of 25 (54.3%) cases were either upstaged or upgraded, 19 (41.3%) showed no change, and the remaining 2 (4.3%) had no malignancy on the final RP specimen. Upstaging occurred in 8 (17.4%) cases: 5 (10.9%) to pT3a and 3 (6.5%) to pT3b. Upgrading occurred in 23 (50%) cases: 19 (41.3%) to Grade 2; 3 (6.5%) to Grade 3; and 1 (2.2%) to Grade 4. Conclusions: There is a 50% likelihood of upstaging or upgrading in Indian males with low-risk PCa eligible for AS. Decision to proceed with AS should be taken carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanky Singh
- Department of Urology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Saurabh Patil
- Department of Urooncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Department of Urooncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Department of Urooncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance. World J Urol 2020; 39:2499-2506. [PMID: 33048258 PMCID: PMC8332649 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess whether a first-degree family history or a fatal family history of prostate cancer (PCa) are associated with postoperative upgrading and upstaging among men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) PCa and to provide guidance on clinical decision making for active surveillance (AS) in this patient population. Methods Participants in the German Familial Prostate Cancer database diagnosed from 1994 to 2019 with (1) low risk (clinical T1c–T2a, biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1, PSA < 10 ng/ml), (2) Gleason 6 FIR (clinical T1c–T2a, GGG 1, PSA 10–20 ng/ml), and (3) Gleason 3 + 4 FIR (clinical T1c–T2a, GGG 2, PSA < 10 ng/ml) PCa who were subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) were analysed for upgrading, defined as postoperative GGG 3 tumour or upstaging, defined as pT3–pT4 or pN1 disease at RP. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether PCa family history was associated with postoperative upgrading or upstaging. Results Among 4091 men who underwent RP, mean age at surgery was 64.4 (SD 6.7) years, 24.7% reported a family history, and 3.4% a fatal family history. Neither family history nor fatal family history were associated with upgrading or upstaging at low risk, Gleason 6 FIR, and Gleason 3 + 4 FIR PCa patients. Conclusion Results from the current study indicated no detrimental effect of family history on postoperative upgrading or upstaging. Therefore, a positive family history or fatal family history of PCa in FIR PCa patients should not be a reason to refrain from AS in men otherwise suitable. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03485-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
18
|
Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Enke CA, Farrington TA, Higano CS, Horwitz EM, Hurwitz M, Ippolito JE, Kane CJ, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Pugh TJ, Richey S, Roach M, Rosenfeld S, Schaeffer E, Shabsigh A, Small EJ, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 17:479-505. [PMID: 31085757 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 814] [Impact Index Per Article: 203.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and workup, treatment options for localized disease, and management of recurrent and advanced disease for clinicians who treat patients with prostate cancer. The portions of the guidelines included herein focus on the roles of germline and somatic genetic testing, risk stratification with nomograms and tumor multigene molecular testing, androgen deprivation therapy, secondary hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Jesse McKenney
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - George Netto
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Richey
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | - Mack Roach
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Edward Schaeffer
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Ahmad Shabsigh
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Eric J Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Jonathan Tward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Becher E, Lepor H. Oncological control following partial gland ablation for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:671-677. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
20
|
Haberal HB, Artykov M, Hazir B, Citamak B, Altan M, Yazici S, Akdogan B, Ozen H. Predictors of ISUP score upgrade in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2020; 107:254-260. [PMID: 32727308 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620943953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The literature contains few studies that focus on the relationship between International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score upgrade and complete blood count (CBC) parameters for patients with low-risk prostate cancer and studies achieved inconclusive results. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed our institutional database for patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1994 and 2017. In total, we included 633 patients with low-risk prostate cancer in the study. We investigated the effects of clinicopathologic factors on ISUP score upgrade. Moreover, we compared RP pathologic outcomes between the patients with and without ISUP score upgrade. RESULTS The mean age and follow-up periods were 61.09±6.61 years and 41.9±1.8 months, respectively. ISUP score upgrade was observed in 207 patients (32.7%). In multivariate analysis, high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and percentage of positive cores were found to be significantly associated with ISUP score upgrade (p = 0.003 and p = 0.003, respectively). The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, and eosinophil-lymphocyte ratio were found to have no effect on ISUP score upgrade (p = 0.856, p = 0.353, p = 0.128, and p = 0.074, respectively). The percentage of tumors, surgical margin positivity, seminal vesicle invasion rate, and extraprostatic extension rate in RP pathology were higher in patients with ISUP score upgrade (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-third of the patients in our series had ISUP score upgrade in RP pathology. PSA density and the percentage of positive cores were found to be the factors significantly associated with ISUP score upgrade. CBC-related factors had no effect on ISUP score upgrade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meylis Artykov
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berk Hazir
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Citamak
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mesut Altan
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sertac Yazici
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bulent Akdogan
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Haluk Ozen
- Department of Urology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ma MW, Gao XS, Lyu F, Gu XB, Yin H, Li HZ, Li XY, Qi X, Bai Y, Chen JY. Development of a nomogram predicting metastatic disease and the assessment of NCCN, AUA and EAU guideline recommendations for bone imaging in prostate cancer patients. World J Urol 2020; 39:1815-1823. [PMID: 32691147 PMCID: PMC8217023 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We identified the risk predictors related to prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis using contemporary data in a community setting. Then, we assessed the performance of indications for bone imaging recommended from the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010–2015), we collected clinicopathological information from PCa patients. The associated risk factors found by multivariate analyses were used to establish forest plots and nomograms for distant metastasis (DM) and bone(s)-only metastasis (BM). We next evaluated the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines indications for the discovery of certain subgroups of patients who should receive bone imaging. Results A total of 120,136 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 96.7% had no metastasis. The odds ratios of positive DM and BM results were 13.90 times and 15.87 times higher in patients with a histologic grade group (GG) 5 than in the reference group. The concordance index of the nomograms based on race, age, T/N stage, PSA, GG, percentage of positive scores for predicting DM and BM was 0.942 and 0.928, respectively. Performance of the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines was high and relatively similar in terms of sensitivity (93.2–96.9%) and negative predictive value (99.8–99.9%). NCCN guidelines had the highest accuracy, specificity and positive likelihood ratio, while negative likelihood ratio was lowest in AUA guideline. Conclusion Histologic GG 5 was the foremost factor for DM and BM. NCCN-based recommendations may be more rational in clinical practice. Nomograms predicting metastasis demonstrate high accuracy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03363-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Bin Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huan Yin
- Department of Health Science & Technology Strategy Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Institute of Medical Information, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The impact of time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy on Gleason score undergrading and other related factors. Actas Urol Esp 2020; 44:187-195. [PMID: 31843220 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gleason score biopsy undergrading (GSBU) can have an impact on the management and prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. We analyze the possible impact of time and other clinical and analytical factors in the appearance of GSBU in our series. PATIENTS AND METHOD Ambispective, multicenter study of 1955 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2005 and 2018. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing are reported by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Mean age 63.69 (44-80) years, median PSA 8.70 ng / ml (1.23-99). GSBU was observed in 34.7% of the entire cohort. In 72.8% of the cases, the GSBU occurred in one consecutive Gleason score, with the progression from 3 + 3 to 3 + 4 being the most frequent (289 patients, 47.6%). Performing radical prostatectomy 90-180 days before or after the biopsy does not have an impact on its undergrading in any of the groups. In the univariate and multivariate analysis, the presence of tumor or pathological rectal examination in both lobes, the tumor load ≥50% of cylinders and a DPSA ≥0.20, showed independent discriminative capacity to select patients who presented GSBU. CONCLUSIONS The time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy did not show impact on GSBU. The number of affected cylinders, bilateral tumor and DPSA are easily accessible parameters that can help us select patients with greater probability of presenting GSBU.
Collapse
|
23
|
Das H, Rodriguez R. Health Care Disparities in Urologic Oncology: A Systematic Review. Urology 2020; 136:9-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
24
|
Preoperative %p2PSA and Prostate Health Index Predict Pathological Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:776. [PMID: 31964956 PMCID: PMC6972898 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57618-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the %p2PSA and prostate health index (PHI) in predicting aggressive pathological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), we enrolled 91 patients with organ-confined PCa who were treated with robot-assisted RP. p2PSA levels and the PHI were investigated for their ability to predict pathological results. The %p2PSA and PHI were both significantly higher in patients with ≥pT3 disease, high-risk disease, positive surgical margin, or seminal vesical invasion (SVI). In univariable analysis, p2PSA derivatives were significant predictors of the presence of ≥pT3 disease, high-risk disease, positive surgical margin, and SVI. To predict adverse pathological outcomes at a sensitivity of 90%, p2PSA derivatives had higher specificity than standard PSA derivatives. In multivariable analysis, additional increases in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were observed with the %p2PSA and PHI for ≥pT3 disease, high-risk disease, and positive surgical margin (8.2% and 2.7%, 6.2% and 4.1%, and 8.6% and 5.4%, respectively). A PHI ≥61.26 enhanced the predictive accuracy of the model for SVI by increasing the AUC from 0.624 to 0.819 (p = 0.009). The preoperative %p2PSA and PHI accurately predict adverse pathological results and are useful for decision-making.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tu X, Liu Z, Zhang C, Chang T, Xu H, Bao Y, Li J, Jin K, Yuan Q, Qiu S, Yang L, Wei Q. Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 2019; 104:187-198. [DOI: 10.1159/000504028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
26
|
Stone NN, Skouteris V, Metsinis PM. Transperineal mapping biopsy improves selection of brachytherapy boost for men with localized prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:33-37. [PMID: 31690515 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if transperineal mapping biopsy (TPMB) can improve the selection of brachytherapy alone (BT) or brachytherapy boost (BTB) in men with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hundred and eighteen men underwent TPMB with a mean of 48.6 cores retrieved. Comparisons were made between prebiopsy risk features and biopsy results to treatment choice with associations tested with ANOVA (bootstrap), χ2 test (Pearson), and linear regression. Survival estimates were tested by the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons by log rank. RESULTS Mean age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and prostate volume were 67.2 years, 8.1 ng/mL, 0.19, and 50.3 cc, respectively. 105 (48.2%) biopsies were positive for Gleason Group (GG) 1: 34 (32.4%), 2: 21 (20%), 3: 31 (29.5%), 4: 7 (6.7%), and 5: 12 (11.4%). The mean number of positive cores (PCs) was 7.3 (median 6, range 1-37). Men with six or more PCs had higher PSA (11.3 vs. 6.0 ng/mL, p = 0.025) and PSAD (0.34 vs. 0.13, p = 0.013). Overall brachytherapy was used in 74 (70.5%) as either monotherapy or boost therapy. Men with BTB had higher PSA (9.7 vs. 6.7 ng/mL, p = 0.029), PSAD (0.27 vs. 0.16, p = 0.007), GG (3.3 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001), more bilateral disease (75.9% vs. 55.6%, odds ratio 3.9, p = 0.008), and PCs (10.9 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001). On linear regression, only GG (p = 0.008) and PCs (p = 0.044) were associated with BTB. Biochemical-free failure at 5 years was 92.7%. CONCLUSIONS TPMB improves the selection of patients for BTB. Men with more PCs are more likely to have BTB. Restricting the need for BTB to those with greater volume prostate cancer may reduce radiation side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson N Stone
- Departments of Urology and Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Morrison BF, Aiken WD, Reid G, Mayhew R, Hanchard B. Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:971. [PMID: 31921342 PMCID: PMC6834384 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies suggest race-based health disparities in men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), with African American males having poorer oncological outcomes. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of pathological upgrading and upstaging in Jamaican men with low-risk PCa treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Data on 141 men who met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for low-risk PCa and underwent RP at a single institution were reviewed. All men had a transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Pre-operative clinical and final pathological data were obtained. Data were summarised as means and standard deviations or percentages as appropriate. Bivariate analyses such as independent samples t-tests and chi-square tables were conducted and logistic regression models were estimated to predict upgrading (>Gleason 6) and upstaging (p ≥ T3). The mean age was 59.5 ± 7.8 years with mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 6.6 ± 2 ng/mL. A total of 48.3% of men were upgraded and 11.4% were upstaged. Bivariate analyses indicated that PSA (p = 0.008) and percentage positive cores (p = 0.002) were associated with upgrading. PSA (p = 0.042) and percentage positive cores (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with upstaging. The odds of upgrading increased with increased PSA levels (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.87, p = 0.021) or increased percentage positive cores (OR 8.27, 95% CI 2.19-31.16, p = 0.002). The odds of upstaging increased with increased PSA levels (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = 0.046) and with increased percentages positive cores (OR 11.4; 95% CI 2.06-63.09, p = 0.005). Jamaican men with low-risk PCa are at high risk of pathological upgrading and upstaging at RP. These findings should be taken into consideration when discussing treatment options with these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gareth Reid
- University of the West Indies, Mona PO, Kingston 7, Jamaica
| | - Richard Mayhew
- University of the West Indies, Mona PO, Kingston 7, Jamaica
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shah N, Ioffe V. Comment on Low-Value Prostate Cancer Screening among Older Men within the Veterans Health Administration. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 68:219-220. [PMID: 31638268 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Navin Shah
- Mid-Atlantic Urology Associates, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Methylation Markers in Prostate Biopsies Are Prognosticators for Late Biochemical Recurrence and Therapy after Surgery in Prostate Cancer Patients. J Mol Diagn 2019; 22:30-39. [PMID: 31605802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
After diagnosis of prostate cancer is confirmed by a positive biopsy, the tumor may be surgically removed via radical prostatectomy (RP). However, many prostate cancer patients experience biochemical recurrence after surgery and/or undergo salvage radiotherapy or hormone therapy. Timely treatment is required to prevent the spread of disease in these cases, and biopsy tissue may hold potential for disease prognostication before surgery is ever performed. We previously developed a prognostic multigene methylation panel in RP specimens, including APC, CRIP3, HOXD3, and TGFB2. In the current study, this panel was applied to a cohort of biopsy specimens (n = 86), which were assessed for DNA methylation using the real-time quantitative PCR-based multiplex MethyLight. The biopsy-based methylation panel is significantly associated with biochemical recurrence when combined with the current clinical parameter of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis and is able to prognosticate the initiation of salvage radiotherapy, where it outperforms PSA, and/or hormone therapy after RP. In addition, this methylation panel is significantly associated with late recurrence occurring within 5 and 7 years after surgery, when combined with PSA at diagnosis. Combining DNA methylation and clinicopathologic markers at the biopsy stage will not only increase their prognostic ability but will also ensure effective patient management.
Collapse
|
31
|
Jayadevan R, Felker ER, Kwan L, Barsa DE, Zhang H, Sisk AE, Delfin M, Marks LS. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1911019. [PMID: 31509206 PMCID: PMC6739900 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Transrectal, ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy often fails to disclose the severity of underlying pathologic findings for prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy may improve the characterization of prostate pathologic results, but few studies have examined its use for the decision to enter active surveillance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether confirmatory biopsy findings by MRI guidance are associated with the risk of pathologic disease upgrading among patients with prostate cancer during active surveillance. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study used prospectively obtained registry data from 332 men with prostate cancer of Gleason grade group (GG) 2 or lower who were referred for active surveillance at a large academic medical center from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2017. EXPOSURES All confirmatory and follow-up biopsies were performed using MRI guidance with an MRI-ultrasonography fusion device. Patients underwent repeated MRI-guided biopsies every 12 to 24 months. At follow-up sessions, in addition to obtaining systematic samples, lesions seen on MRI were targeted and foci of low-grade prostate cancer were obtained again using tracking technology. Active surveillance was terminated with detection of at least GG3 disease or receipt of treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was upgrading to at least GG3 disease during active surveillance. Secondary outcomes were the associations of MRI lesion grade, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, and biopsy method (targeted, systematic, or tracked) with the primary outcome. RESULTS Of 332 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [7.6] years), 39 (11.7%) upgraded to at least GG3 disease during follow-up. The incidence of upgrading was 7.9% (9 of 114) when the confirmatory biopsy finding was normal, 11.4% (20 of 175) when the finding showed GG1 disease, and 23.3% (10 of 43) when the finding was GG2 disease (P = .03). Men with GG2 disease were almost 8 times more likely to upgrade during surveillance compared with those with normal findings but only among those with low PSA density (hazard ratio [HR], 7.82; 95% CI, 2.29-26.68). A PSA density of at least 0.15 ng/mL/mL was associated with increased risk of upgrading among patients with normal findings (HR, 7.21; 95% CI, 1.98-26.24) or GG1 disease (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.16 to 7.03) on confirmatory biopsy. A total of 46% of pathologic disease upgrades would have been missed if only the targeted biopsy was performed and 65% of disease upgrades were detected only with tracked biopsy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that confirmatory biopsy with MRI guidance is significantly associated with future disease upgrading of prostate cancer, especially when combined with PSA density, and should be considered as an appropriate entry point for active surveillance. Systematic and targeted biopsies were additive in detection of clinically significant cancers. Repeated biopsy at sites at which findings were previously abnormal (tracking biopsy) facilitated detection of cancers not suitable for continued active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Jayadevan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ely R. Felker
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Lorna Kwan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Danielle E. Barsa
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Haoyue Zhang
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Anthony E. Sisk
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Merdie Delfin
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Leonard S. Marks
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Location and Grade of Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Transperineal Template-guided Mapping Biopsy After Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 41:723-729. [PMID: 27906722 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the location and grade of prostate cancer diagnosed by transperineal template-guided mapping (TTMB) after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This analysis consisted of 1118 consecutive patients who underwent TTMB from January 2005 to August 2015. Eight hundred thirty-five underwent TTMB after at least 1 negative TRUS biopsy and 283 underwent TTMB as the first biopsy procedure. The study population was divided into cohorts based on the number of prior TRUS biopsy sessions (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). No patient underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in location and cancer grade detected on TTMB were evaluated as a function of the number of prior TRUS biopsies. RESULTS Of the 1118 patients, 679 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. This included 208, 325, 104, and 42 patients who underwent 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 prior TRUS biopsies. The incidence of cancer detection on TTMB decreased as the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased (73.5% vs. 62.4% vs. 51.7% vs. 37.2%, P<0.001); however, it became increasingly likely that TTMB would detect anterior prostate only as the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased (P=0.007). Moreover, the incidence of high grade cancer (Gleason score ≥7) in the anterior gland increased with the number of previous TRUS biopsies. CONCLUSIONS TTMB detected prostate cancer in over half of the patients with one or more negative TRUS biopsies. The majority of TTMB detected cancers were Gleason score ≥7. As the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased, there was a commensurate increase in the proportion of high-grade, anterior only disease.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mahal AR, Butler S, Franco I, Muralidhar V, Larios D, Pike LRG, Zhao SG, Sanford NN, Dess RT, Feng FY, D'Amico AV, Spratt DE, Yu JB, Nguyen PL, Rebbeck TR, Mahal BA. Conservative management of low-risk prostate cancer among young versus older men in the United States: Trends and outcomes from a novel national database. Cancer 2019; 125:3338-3346. [PMID: 31251398 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management for men aged ≤55 years with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) is debated given quality-of-life implications with definitive treatment versus the potential missed opportunity for cure with conservative management. The objective of this study was to define rates of conservative management for LRPC and associated short-term outcomes in young versus older men in the United States. METHODS The nonpublic Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting (AS/WW) Database identified 50,302 men who were diagnosed with LRPC from 2010 through 2015. AS/WW rates in the United States were stratified by age (≤55 vs ≥56 years). Prostate cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality were defined by initial management type (AS/WW vs definitive treatment [referent]) and age. RESULTS AS/WW utilization increased from 8.61% (2010) to 34.56% (2015) among men aged ≤55 years (P for trend <0.001) and from 15.99% to 43.81% among men aged ≥56 years (P for trend <.001). Among patients who had ≤2 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 12.90% to 48.78% for men aged ≤55 years and from 21.85% to 58.01% for men aged ≥56 years. Among patients who had ≥3 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 3.89% to 22.45% for men aged ≤55 years and from 10.05% to 28.49% for men aged ≥56 years (all P for trend <.001). Five-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were <0.30% across age and initial management type subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AS/WW rates quadrupled for patients aged ≤55 years from 2010 to 2015, with favorable short-term outcomes. These findings demonstrate the short-term safety and increasing acceptance of AS/WW for both younger and older patients. However, there are still higher absolute rates of AS/WW in older patients (P < .001), suggesting some national ambivalence toward AS/WW in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandeep R Mahal
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Santino Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Idalid Franco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vinayak Muralidhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Departmentof Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eminaga O, Al-Hamad O, Boegemann M, Breil B, Semjonow A. Combination possibility and deep learning model as clinical decision-aided approach for prostate cancer. Health Informatics J 2019; 26:945-962. [PMID: 31238766 DOI: 10.1177/1460458219855884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to introduce as proof of concept a combination model for classification of prostate cancer using deep learning approaches. We utilized patients with prostate cancer who underwent surgical treatment representing the various conditions of disease progression. All possible combinations of significant variables from logistic regression and correlation analyses were determined from study data sets. The combination possibility and deep learning model was developed to predict these combinations that represented clinically meaningful patient's subgroups. The observed relative frequencies of different tumor stages and Gleason score Gls changes from biopsy to prostatectomy were available for each group. Deep learning models and seven machine learning approaches were compared for the classification performance of Gleason score changes and pT2 stage. Deep models achieved the highest F1 scores by pT2 tumors (0.849) and Gls change (0.574). Combination possibility and deep learning model is a useful decision-aided tool for prostate cancer and to group patients with prostate cancer into clinically meaningful groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okyaz Eminaga
- Stanford University School of Medicine, USA; University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang JH, Sierra P, Richards KA, Abel EJ, Allen GO, Downs TM, Jarrard DF. Impact of bilateral biopsy-detected prostate cancer on an active surveillance population. BMC Urol 2019; 19:26. [PMID: 31014300 PMCID: PMC6480830 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0452-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess factors that can predict active surveillance (AS) failure on serial transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS We evaluated the records of 144 consecutive patients enrolled in AS between 2007 and 2014 at a single academic institution. Low risk inclusion criteria included PSA < 10 ng/ml, cT1c or cT2a, Grade Group (GG) 1, < 3 positive cores, and < 50% tumor in a single core with the majority having a PSA density of < 0.15. AS reclassification was defined as progression to GG ≥2, 3 or more cores, or core tumor volume ≥ 50%. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine predictors of reclassification and a match-pair analysis performed on a control group of patients choosing surgery. RESULTS Inclusion criteria were met by 130 men with a median follow-up of 52 months. The reclassification or AS failure rate was 38.5%, with the majority 41/50 (82%) finding GG ≥ 2 cancer. Most patients had unilateral disease on diagnostic biopsy (94.6%), but 40.7% had bilateral cancer detected during follow-up. Men with bilateral detected tumor were more likely to ultimately fail AS than patients with unilateral tumors (HR 4.089; P < 0.0001) and failed earlier with a reclassification-free survival of 32 vs 119 months respectively. In a matched-pair analysis using a population of 211 concurrent patients that chose radical prostatectomy rather than AS, 76% of patients with unilateral cancer on biopsy had bilateral cancer on final pathology. CONCLUSIONS The finding of bilateral prostate cancer on biopsy is associated with earlier AS reclassification. Finding bilateral disease may not represent disease progression, but rather enhanced detection of more extensive disease highlighting the importance of confirmatory biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pablo Sierra
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Universidad CES, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Kyle A Richards
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - E Jason Abel
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen O Allen
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tracy M Downs
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David F Jarrard
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. .,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA. .,Wisconsin Institute for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chaloupka M, Westhofen T, Kretschmer A, Grimm T, Stief C, Apfelbeck M. [Active surveillance of prostate cancer : An update]. Urologe A 2019; 58:329-340. [PMID: 30824971 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-019-0894-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease. In cases of low-risk prostate cancer, active surveillance represents an attractive alternative treatment. Significant complications of a definitive treatment can therefore be delayed or completely avoided. Despite strict inclusion criteria for active surveillance, the diagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer can be inaccurate and there is therefore a risk of missing the optimal point in time for definitive treatment. Multimodal diagnostics and continuous aftercare are therefore crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chaloupka
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - T Westhofen
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - A Kretschmer
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - T Grimm
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - C Stief
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - M Apfelbeck
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Campus Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Use of MRI-Guided Biopsy for Selection and Follow-up of Men Undergoing Hemi-gland Cryoablation of Prostate Cancer. Urology 2019; 126:158-164. [PMID: 30659903 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate safety, efficacy, and quality of life impact of hemi-gland cryotherapy for clinically-significant prostate cancer (CaP), when patient selection and follow-up includes MRI-guided biopsy. METHODS Twenty-nine men with unilateral CaP (all clinically significant with prostate volume <60 cc) were enrolled in a prospective observational trial of hemi-gland cryotherapy. Mean patient age was 68.7 years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.6 ng/mL. MRI-guided biopsy (3T-MRI, Artemis US fusion) was used for diagnosis and repeated at 6-month follow-up in all men. Treatment was under general anesthesia using the BTG/Galil system. Validated questionnaires were used to determine effects of treatment on urinary and sexual function and quality of life. RESULTS Cryotherapy was completed satisfactorily in all 29 cases in <60 minutes with no intraoperative complications. Significant decreases in PSA (median decrease 5.6 ng/mL) and PSA density (median decrease 0.14 ng/mL/cc) were observed (P < .01). At 6 months, 23 patients (79%) demonstrated no residual cancer on follow-up MRI-guided biopsy of the treated side. Three patients (10%) revealed micro-residual disease. Three patients (10%) had residual cancer and underwent further treatment. Ipsilateral MRI lesions were present before treatment in 26 patients and after treatment in only 2, reflecting the gross ablative effect; however, MRI showed disappearance of lesions in 4 patients with residual tumor on biopsy. The single complication was 1 case of transient urinary retention; 85% of men who were sexually active continued without change after treatment. Voiding function was unchanged. CONCLUSION Hemi-gland cryoablation for clinically-significant CaP is well-tolerated, and when patients are selected and followed by MRI/US fusion biopsy, cancer control appears promising at 6 months.
Collapse
|
38
|
Yang DD, Mahal BA, Muralidhar V, Nezolosky MD, Vastola ME, Labe SA, Boldbaatar N, King MT, Martin NE, Orio PF, Beard CJ, Hoffman KE, Trinh QD, Spratt DE, Feng FY, Nguyen PL. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3 + 4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:69-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
39
|
A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2018; 50:1989-1997. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1986-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
Leyh-Bannurah SR, Karakiewicz PI, Pompe RS, Preisser F, Zaffuto E, Dell’Oglio P, Briganti A, Nafez O, Fisch M, Steuber T, Graefen M, Budäus L. Inverse stage migration patterns in North American patients undergoing local prostate cancer treatment: a contemporary population-based update in light of the 2012 USPSTF recommendations. World J Urol 2018; 37:469-479. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2396-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
41
|
Cole AP, Friedlander DF, Trinh QD. Secondary data sources for health services research in urologic oncology. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:165-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
42
|
Elkhoury FF, Simopoulos DN, Marks LS. MR-guided biopsy and focal therapy: new options for prostate cancer management. Curr Opin Urol 2018; 28:93-101. [PMID: 29232269 PMCID: PMC7314431 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Options for prostate cancer management are rapidly expanding. The recent advent of MRI technology has led to guided prostate biopsies by radiologists working in-bore or by urologists using MR/US fusion technology. The resulting tumor visualization now provides the option of focal therapy. Currently available are highly directed energies - focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryotherapy, and laser - all offering the hope of curing prostate cancer with few side effects. RECENT FINDINGS MRI now enables visualization of many prostate cancers. MR/US fusion biopsy makes possible the targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions efficiently in the urology clinic. Several fusion devices are now commercially available. Focal therapy, a derivative of targeted biopsy, is reshaping the approach to treatment of some prostate cancers. Focal laser ablation, originally done in the MRI gantry (in-bore), promises to soon become feasible in a clinic setting (out-of-bore) under local anesthesia. Other focal therapy options, including HIFU and cryotherapy, are currently available. Herein are summarized outcomes data on focal therapy modalities. SUMMARY MRI-guided biopsy is optimizing prostate cancer diagnosis. Focal therapy, an outgrowth of guided biopsy, promises to become a well tolerated and effective approach to treating many men with prostate cancer while minimizing the risks of incontinence and impotence from radical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuad F. Elkhoury
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, Phone: 310-794-8659, Fax: 310-794-8653
| | - Demetrios N. Simopoulos
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, Phone: 310-794-8659, Fax: 310-794-8653
| | - Leonard S. Marks
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, Phone: 310-794-8659, Fax: 310-794-8653
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sierra PS, Damodaran S, Jarrard D. Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 44:440-451. [PMID: 29368876 PMCID: PMC5996796 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of small, lower risk well-differentiated prostate cancer is increasing and almost half of the patients with this diagnosis are candidates for initial conservative management in an attempt to avoid overtreatment and morbidity associated with surgery or radiation. A proportion of patients labeled as low risk, candidates for Active Surveillance (AS), harbor aggressive disease and would benefit from definitive treatment. The focus of this review is to identify clinicopathologic features that may help identify these less optimal AS candidates. A systematic Medline/PubMed Review was performed in January 2017 according to PRISMA guidelines; 83 articles were selected for full text review according to their relevance and after applying limits described. For patients meeting AS criteria including Gleason Score 6, several factors can assist in predicting those patients that are at higher risk for reclassification including higher PSA density, bilateral cancer, African American race, small prostate volume and low testosterone. Nomograms combining these features improve risk stratification. Clinical and pathologic features provide a significant amount of information for risk stratification (>70%) for patients considering active surveillance. Higher risk patient subgroups can benefit from further evaluation or consideration of treatment. Recommendations will continue to evolve as data from longer term AS cohorts matures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shivashankar Damodaran
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David Jarrard
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang JH, Downs TM, Jason Abel E, Richards KA, Jarrard DF. Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Protocols: Immediate Re-biopsy and Timing of Subsequent Biopsies. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:48. [PMID: 28589399 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0702-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This manuscript reviews contemporary literature regarding prostate cancer active surveillance (AS) protocols as well as other tools that may guide the management of biopsy frequency and assess the possibility of progression in low-risk prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS There is no consensus regarding the timing of surveillance biopsies; however, an immediate repeat biopsy within 12 months of diagnosis for patients considering AS confirms patients who have favorable risk disease yet also identifies patients who were undersampled initially. Studies regarding multiparametric MRI, nomograms, and biomarkers show promise in risk stratifying and counseling patients during AS. Further studies are needed to determine if these supplemental tests can decrease the frequency of surveillance biopsies. An immediate re-biopsy can help to reduce the risk of missing clinically significant disease. Other clinical tools, including mpMRI, exist that can be used as an adjunct to counsel patients and guide a personalized discussion regarding the frequency of surveillance biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tracy M Downs
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - E Jason Abel
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kyle A Richards
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David F Jarrard
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. .,University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA. .,Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Elkhoury FF, Simopoulos DN, Marks LS. Targeted Prostate Biopsy in the Era of Active Surveillance. Urology 2018; 112:12-19. [PMID: 28962878 PMCID: PMC5856576 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance is improving the accuracy of prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis. This new biopsy technology is especially important for men undergoing active surveillance, improving patient selection for enrollment and enabling precise longitudinal monitoring. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy allows for 3 functions not previously possible with US-guided biopsy: targeting of suspicious regions, template-mapping for systematic sampling, and tracking of cancer foci over time. This article reviews the evolving role of the new biopsy methods in active surveillance, including the UCLA Active Surveillance pathway, which has incorporated magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy from program inception as a possible model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuad F Elkhoury
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Demetrios N Simopoulos
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Leonard S Marks
- UCLA Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Wasserman Bldg, Suite 331, UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Miyamoto DT, Lee RJ, Kalinich M, LiCausi JA, Zheng Y, Chen T, Milner JD, Emmons E, Ho U, Broderick K, Silva E, Javaid S, Kwan TT, Hong X, Dahl DM, McGovern FJ, Efstathiou JA, Smith MR, Sequist LV, Kapur R, Wu CL, Stott SL, Ting DT, Giobbie-Hurder A, Toner M, Maheswaran S, Haber DA. An RNA-Based Digital Circulating Tumor Cell Signature Is Predictive of Drug Response and Early Dissemination in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov 2018; 8:288-303. [PMID: 29301747 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-1406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers are critical in metastatic prostate cancer, where characteristic bone metastases are not readily sampled, and they may enable risk stratification in localized disease. We established a sensitive and high-throughput strategy for analyzing prostate circulating tumor cells (CTC) using microfluidic cell enrichment followed by digital quantitation of prostate-derived transcripts. In a prospective study of 27 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with first-line abiraterone, pretreatment elevation of the digital CTCM score identifies a high-risk population with poor overall survival (HR = 6.0; P = 0.01) and short radiographic progression-free survival (HR = 3.2; P = 0.046). Expression of HOXB13 in CTCs identifies 6 of 6 patients with ≤12-month survival, with a subset also expressing the ARV7 splice variant. In a second cohort of 34 men with localized prostate cancer, an elevated preoperative CTCL score predicts microscopic dissemination to seminal vesicles and/or lymph nodes (P < 0.001). Thus, digital quantitation of CTC-specific transcripts enables noninvasive monitoring that may guide treatment selection in both metastatic and localized prostate cancer.Significance: There is an unmet need for biomarkers to guide prostate cancer therapies, for curative treatment of localized cancer and for application of molecularly targeted agents in metastatic disease. Digital quantitation of prostate CTC-derived transcripts in blood specimens is predictive of abiraterone response in metastatic cancer and of early dissemination in localized cancer. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 288-303. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Heitzer and Speicher, p. 269This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Miyamoto
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard J Lee
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark Kalinich
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph A LiCausi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yu Zheng
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tianqi Chen
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John D Milner
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Erin Emmons
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Uyen Ho
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Erin Silva
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Javaid
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Xin Hong
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas M Dahl
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Francis J McGovern
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lecia V Sequist
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ravi Kapur
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon L Stott
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David T Ting
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anita Giobbie-Hurder
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mehmet Toner
- Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shyamala Maheswaran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel A Haber
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pestova K, Koch AJ, Quesenberry CP, Shan J, Zhang Y, Leimpeter AD, Blondin B, Sitailo S, Buckingham L, Du J, Fei H, Van Den Eeden SK. Identification of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay markers for prediction of disease progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:2. [PMID: 29291731 PMCID: PMC5749018 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3910-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer among U.S. males. In recent decades many men with low risk PCa have been over diagnosed and over treated. Given significant co-morbidities associated with definitive treatments, maximizing patient quality of life while recognizing early signs of aggressive disease is essential. There remains a need to better stratify newly diagnosed men according to the risk of disease progression, identifying, with high sensitivity and specificity, candidates for active surveillance versus intervention therapy. The objective of this study was to select fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panels that differentiate non-progressive from progressive disease in patients with low and intermediate risk PCa. METHODS We performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate FISH biomarkers on specimens from PCa patients with clinically localised disease (T1c-T2c) enrolled in Watchful waiting (WW)/Active Surveillance (AS). The patients were classified into cases (progressed to clinical intervention within 10 years), and controls (did not progress in 10 years). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the best 3-5 probe combinations. FISH parameters were then combined with the clinical parameters ─ National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NNCN) risk categories ─ in the logistic regression model. RESULTS Seven combinations of FISH parameters with the highest sensitivity and specificity for discriminating cases from controls were selected based on the ROC curve analysis. In the logistic regression model, these combinations contributed significantly to the prediction of PCa outcome. The combination of NCCN risk categories and FISH was additive to the clinical parameters or FISH alone in the final model, with odds ratios of 5.1 to 7.0 for the likelihood of the FISH-positive patients in the intended population to develop disease progression, as compared to the FISH-negative group. CONCLUSIONS Combinations of FISH parameters discriminating progressive from non-progressive PCa were selected based on ROC curve analysis. The combination of clinical parameters and FISH outperformed clinical parameters alone, and was complimentary to clinical parameters in the final model, demonstrating potential utility of multi-colour FISH panels as an auxiliary tool for PCa risk stratification. Further studies with larger cohorts are planned to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Pestova
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | - Adam J. Koch
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | - Charles P. Quesenberry
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA USA
| | - Jun Shan
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA USA
| | - Ying Zhang
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | | | - Beth Blondin
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | - Svetlana Sitailo
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | | | - Jing Du
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | - Huixin Fei
- Abbott Molecular, Inc., 1300 East Touhy Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Focal Therapy Versus Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Cancer. Prostate Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78646-9_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
49
|
Fitch M, Pang K, Ouellet V, Loiselle C, Alibhai S, Chevalier S, Drachenberg DE, Finelli A, Lattouf JB, Sutcliffe S, So A, Tanguay S, Saad F, Mes-Masson AM. Canadian Men's perspectives about active surveillance in prostate cancer: need for guidance and resources. BMC Urol 2017; 17:98. [PMID: 29078772 PMCID: PMC5658971 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0290-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In prostate cancer, men diagnosed with low risk disease may be monitored through an active surveillance. This research explored the perspectives of men with prostate cancer regarding their decision-making process for active surveillance to identify factors that influence their decision and assist health professionals in having conversations about this option. Methods Focus group interviews (n = 7) were held in several Canadian cities with men (N = 52) diagnosed with prostate cancer and eligible for active surveillance. The men’s viewpoints were captured regarding their understanding of active surveillance, the factors that influenced their decision, and their experience with the approach. A content and theme analysis was performed on the verbatim transcripts from the sessions. Results Patients described their concerns of living with their disease without intervention, but were reassured by the close monitoring under AS while avoiding harmful side effects associated with treatments. Conversations with their doctor and how AS was described were cited as key influences in their decision, in addition to availability of information on treatment options, distrust in the health system, personality, experiences and opinions of others, and personal perspectives on quality of life. Conclusions Men require a thorough explanation on AS as a safe and valid option, as well as guidance towards supportive resources in their decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Fitch
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kittie Pang
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Veronique Ouellet
- Institut du cancer de Montréal and Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 900 St Denis St, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carmen Loiselle
- McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shabbir Alibhai
- University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simone Chevalier
- McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lattouf
- Institut du cancer de Montréal and Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 900 St Denis St, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Surgery Université de Montréal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Simon Sutcliffe
- Terrry Fox Research Institute, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alan So
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, 2660 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Institut du cancer de Montréal and Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 900 St Denis St, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Surgery Université de Montréal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Institut du cancer de Montréal and Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 900 St Denis St, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ferro M, Lucarelli G, Bruzzese D, Di Lorenzo G, Perdonà S, Autorino R, Cantiello F, La Rocca R, Busetto GM, Cimmino A, Buonerba C, Battaglia M, Damiano R, De Cobelli O, Mirone V, Terracciano D. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Oncotarget 2017; 8:18424-18434. [PMID: 27793023 PMCID: PMC5392340 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) is currently a widely accepted treatment option for men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Several reports have highlighted the association of low serum testosterone levels with high-grade, high-stage PCa. However, the impact of serum testosterone as a predictor of progression in men with low-risk PCa has been little assessed. In this study, we evaluated the association of circulating testosterone concentrations with a staging/grading reclassification in a cohort of low-risk PCa patients meeting the inclusion criteria for the AS protocol but opting for radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy (RP) was performed in 338 patients, eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, PSA<10ng/ml, two or fewer cancer cores, Gleason score (GS)=6 and PSA density<0.2 ng/mL/cc. Reclassification was defined as upstaging (stage>pT2) and upgrading (GS=7; primary Gleason pattern 4) disease. Unfavorable disease was defined as the occurrence of pathological stage>pT2 and predominant Gleason score 4. Total testosterone was measured before surgery. Low serum testosterone levels (<300 ng/dL) were significantly associated with upgrading, upstaging, unfavorable disease and positive surgical margins. The addition of testosterone to a base model, including age, PSA, PSA density, clinical stage and positive cancer involvement in cores, showed a significant independent influence of this variable on upstaging, upgrading and unfavorable disease. In conclusion, our results support the idea that total testosterone should be a selection criterion for inclusion of low-risk PCa patients in AS programs and suggest that testosterone level less than 300 ng/dL should be considered a discouraging factor when a close AS program is considered as treatment option
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Dario Bruzzese
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - IRCCS", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | | | - Amelia Cimmino
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics "A. Buzzati Traverso", National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|