1
|
Gomes M, Turner AJ, Sammon C, Dawoud D, Ramagopalan S, Simpson A, Siebert U. Acceptability of Using Real-World Data to Estimate Relative Treatment Effects in Health Technology Assessments: Barriers and Future Steps. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:623-632. [PMID: 38369282 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence about the comparative effects of new treatments is typically collected in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In some instances, RCTs are not possible, or their value is limited by an inability to capture treatment effects over the longer term or in all relevant population subgroups. In these cases, nonrandomized studies (NRS) using real-world data (RWD) are increasingly used to complement trial evidence on treatment effects for health technology assessment (HTA). However, there have been concerns over a lack of acceptability of this evidence by HTA agencies. This article aims to identify the barriers to the acceptance of NRS and steps that may facilitate increases in the acceptability of NRS in the future. METHODS Opinions of the authorship team based on their experience in real-world evidence research in academic, HTA, and industry settings, supported by a critical assessment of existing studies. RESULTS Barriers were identified that are applicable to key stakeholder groups, including HTA agencies (eg, the lack of comprehensive methodological guidelines for using RWD), evidence generators (eg, avoidable deviations from best practices), and external stakeholders (eg, data controllers providing timely access to high-quality RWD). Future steps that may facilitate future acceptability of NRS include improvements in the quality, integration, and accessibility of RWD, wider use of demonstration projects to highlight the value and applicability of nonrandomized designs, living, and more detailed HTA guidelines, and improvements in HTA infrastructure relating to RWD. CONCLUSION NRS can represent a crucial source of evidence on treatment effects for use in HTA when RCT evidence is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Gomes
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England, UK
| | | | | | - Dalia Dawoud
- Science, Policy and Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK; Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Alex Simpson
- Global Access, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Center for Health Decision Science and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marshall DA, Hua N, Buchanan J, Christensen KD, Frederix GWJ, Goranitis I, Ijzerman M, Jansen JP, Lavelle TA, Regier DA, Smith HS, Ungar WJ, Weymann D, Wordsworth S, Phillips KA. Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready? HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2024; 2:qxae053. [PMID: 38783891 PMCID: PMC11115369 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Despite the emerging evidence in recent years, successful implementation of clinical genomic sequencing (CGS) remains limited and is challenged by a range of barriers. These include a lack of standardized practices, limited economic assessments for specific indications, limited meaningful patient engagement in health policy decision-making, and the associated costs and resource demand for implementation. Although CGS is gradually becoming more available and accessible worldwide, large variations and disparities remain, and reflections on the lessons learned for successful implementation are sparse. In this commentary, members of the Global Economics and Evaluation of Clinical Genomics Sequencing Working Group (GEECS) describe the global landscape of CGS in the context of health economics and policy and propose evidence-based solutions to address existing and future barriers to CGS implementation. The topics discussed are reflected as two overarching themes: (1) system readiness for CGS and (2) evidence, assessments, and approval processes. These themes highlight the need for health economics, public health, and infrastructure and operational considerations; a robust patient- and family-centered evidence base on CGS outcomes; and a comprehensive, collaborative, interdisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Nicolle Hua
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AB, United Kingdom
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Maarten Ijzerman
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Eramus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen P Jansen
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Hadley S Smith
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
- Health Affairs Scholar Emerging & Global Health Policy, Health Affairs, Washington, DC 20036, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bharmal M, Katsoulis I, Chang J, Graham A, Stavropoulou A, Jhingran P, Pashos CL. Real-world evidence in the reassessment of oncology therapies: payer perceptions from five countries. Future Oncol 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38573230 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study explored the perceived value of real-world evidence (RWE) in the reassessment of oncology therapies by collecting the perspectives of health technology assessment/payer decision-makers. Materials & methods: A web-based survey was conducted using the Market Access Transformation Rapid Payer Response online portal. 30 participants from France, Germany, Spain, the UK and the USA were recruited based on their expertise. Results: Participants agreed that the most common uses of RWE are to confirm efficacy and safety results from randomized controlled trials and to reevaluate the projected utilization of an oncology therapy. We found variability in other reported uses of RWE. Conclusion: The organizations developing RWE should ensure that their plans recognize the heterogeneity in payer perceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murtuza Bharmal
- Global Evidence & Value Development Oncology, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA 02370, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | | | - Jane Chang
- Value & Evidence, Pfizer, New York, NY 10001-2192, USA
| | - Alex Graham
- Market Access Transformation, Fleet, GU51 2UJ, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang WW, Juan YC, Wu GHM, Pwu RF. The Critical Intersect of Regulations, Health Technology Assessment, and Drug Safety Assessments. Drug Saf 2024; 47:289-299. [PMID: 38113017 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01386-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process that determines the value of health technology at different points in its lifecycle. Safety issues have become more important since regulatory authorities are increasingly adopting flexible standards, processes, and evidentiary requirements for drug approval. In this article, we compared the different role of regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. Additionally, the experience of regulatory-HTA collaboration for assessment and/or decision-making on safety issues in the lifecycle of a health technology is illustrated, including olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor antagonist) and the direct-acting hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral agents. Post-licensing data can be derived from various sources such as electronic health records, medical claims, drug and disease registries, post-authorization safety studies (PASS) or post-authorization safety efficacy studies (PAES), periodic benefit-risk assessment reports, as well as HTA reassessment reports, which incorporate utilization information from patients in a real-world setting and provide crucial evidence for various purposes. With the ongoing accumulation of safety and efficacy information during post-regulatory approval, a standardized process for continuous data collection and active reassessment of risk and benefit becomes crucial for managing the lifecycle of health technologies. In order to define evidence requirements clearly, reduce uncertainty, and minimize delays in HTA approval, early engagement and collaboration of HTA agencies in the regulatory review processes have become more common. However, there is currently limited interaction and collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. This article aims to identify the challenges faced by regulators and HTA agencies today, emphasizing the significance of conducting regulatory reviews and health technology assessments throughout a technology's lifecycle, underlining the value of utilizing real-world data and evidence, and emphasizing the necessity of enhancing collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies, all within the overarching context of drug safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Wen Yang
- Data Science Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 242062, Taiwan, R.O.C
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Yi-Chen Juan
- National Taiwan University Hospital-Integrative Medical Database, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Grace Hui-Min Wu
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C
- Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Raoh-Fang Pwu
- Data Science Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 242062, Taiwan, R.O.C..
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C..
- School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paulden M, Sampson C, O'Mahony JF, Spackman E, McCabe C, Round J, Snowsill T. Logical Inconsistencies in the Health Years in Total and Equal Value of Life-Years Gained. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:356-366. [PMID: 38048985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess whether recently proposed alternatives to the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), intended to address concerns about discrimination, are suitable for informing resource allocation decisions. METHODS We consider 2 alternatives to the QALY: the health years in total (HYT), recently proposed by Basu et al, and the equal value of life-years gained (evLYG), currently used by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. For completeness we also consider unweighted life-years (LYs). Using a hypothetical example comparing 3 mutually exclusive treatment options, we consider how calculations are performed under each approach and whether the resulting rankings are logically consistent. We also explore some further challenges that arise from the unique properties of the HYT approach. RESULTS The HYT and evLYG approaches can result in logical inconsistencies that do not arise under the QALY or LY approaches. HYT can violate the independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom, whereas the evLYG can produce an unstable ranking of treatment options. HYT have additional issues, including an implausible assumption that the utilities associated with health-related quality of life and LYs are "separable," and a consideration of "counterfactual" health-related quality of life for patients who are dead. CONCLUSIONS The HYT and evLYG approaches can result in logically inconsistent decisions. We recommend that decision makers avoid these approaches and that the logical consistency of any approaches proposed in future be thoroughly explored before considering their use in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Paulden
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | - Eldon Spackman
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher McCabe
- Centre for Public Health and Queens Management School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Jeff Round
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarri G, Forsythe A, Elvidge J, Dawoud D. Living health technology assessments: how close to living reality? BMJ Evid Based Med 2023; 28:369-371. [PMID: 36797052 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Grammati Sarri
- Real World and Advanced Analytics, Cytel Inc, London, UK
| | - Anna Forsythe
- Real World and Advanced Analytics, Cytel Inc, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jamie Elvidge
- Science, Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- Science, Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Merlin T, Street J, Carter D, Haji Ali Afzali H. Challenges in the Evaluation of Emerging Highly Specialised Technologies: Is There a Role for Living HTA? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:823-830. [PMID: 37824056 PMCID: PMC10628011 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00835-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
There is currently deep uncertainty about the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of highly specialised technologies (HSTs), like gene and cell therapies. These treatments are novel, typically have high upfront costs, the patient populations are small and heterogenous, there is minimal information on their long-term safety and effectiveness, and data are limited and often of poor quality. With the increasing number of these technologies and their high cost burden on governments and health care providers, policy makers are currently walking a decision tightrope. On the one hand, an unfavourable funding decision could potentially limit patient access to life-saving treatments, while on the other, a favourable decision could result in unsustainable budget impacts and perhaps poorer patient health outcomes. Health technology assessment (HTA) is meant to determine the value of a health technology in order to promote an equitable, efficient, and high-quality health system. However, standard HTA processes have failed to mitigate the deep uncertainties associated with these technologies. In this paper, we propose a Living HTA framework to address these challenges. This framework includes a one-off process for making explicit the societal values associated with HSTs. These would inform the decision-making approach, data collection and the development of disease-specific reference models to be used by industry sponsors as the basis for their submissions for public funding. Coverage with an evidence development mechanism is also proposed by which data can be collected in real time to update the reference model on a rolling basis, thereby allowing re-assessment of the clinical and cost effectiveness of individual HSTs. The HTA would be 'live' until the results indicate there is sufficient certainty for the funding decision to be confirmed, the price changed or the funding removed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Merlin
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Jackie Street
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Drew Carter
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Hossein Haji Ali Afzali
- School of Public Health, Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX650545, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sagoo GS, Robinson T, Coughlan D, Meader N, Rice S, Vale L. Evaluating high-cost technologies - no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:1177-1183. [PMID: 37755333 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2263647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence generation for the health technology assessment (HTA) of a new technology is a long and expensive process with no guarantees that the health technology will be adopted and implemented into a health-care system. This would suggest that there is a greater risk of failure for a company developing a high-cost technology and therefore incentives (such as increasing the funding available for research or additional market exclusivity) may be needed to encourage development of such technologies as has been seen with many high-cost orphan drugs. AREAS COVERED This paper discusses some of the key issues relating to the evaluation of high-cost technologies through the use of existing HTA processes and what the challenges will be going forward. EXPERT OPINION We propose that while the current HTA process is robust, its evolution into accommodating the incorporation of real-world data and evidence alongside a life-cycle HTA approach should better enable developers to produce the evidence required on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This should lead to reduced decision uncertainty for HTA agencies to make adoption decisions in a more timely and efficient manner. Furthermore, budget impact analysis remains important in understanding the actual financial impact on health-care systems and budgets outside of the cost-effectiveness framework used to aid decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurdeep S Sagoo
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Diarmuid Coughlan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Nick Meader
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Stephen Rice
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nijmeijer HGB, Huinck WJ, Kramer SE, Donders ART, van der Wilt GJ, Mylanus EAM. Changes on clinical and participatory outcomes in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss after cochlear implantation: protocol of a multicentre prospective observational cohort study - Societal Merit of Intervention on Hearing Loss Evaluation (SMILE). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072689. [PMID: 37369408 PMCID: PMC10410821 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implantation (CI) is a (cost-)effective intervention for people with severe or profound hearing loss. Since its introduction experience increased and the technology evolved, leading to better results and relaxation of CI eligibility criteria. Meanwhile, with national healthcare costs increasing there is a need for evidence of healthcare technology's value. This protocol describes a study to investigate clinical and participatory outcomes after CI for the currently (expanded) eligible hearing impaired population. The study adds to the current evidence base through its multicentre design, long-term follow-up and use of participatory outcomes alongside standard clinical outcomes. METHODS This multicentre prospective observational cohort study will include at least 156 adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss, approximately evenly divided into two groups (1, ages 18-65 years and 2, age >65 years). The measurements consist of audiometry, cognition tests, listening effort tests and multiple generic and disease specific questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered twice before CI, soon after inclusion at CI referral and shortly before CI surgery, with an annual follow-up of 3 years after CI. The Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire will be used to assess participation. Generalised models (linear, logistic, Poisson) will be used. Mixed effects models will be used to investigate changes over time while exploring differences in subgroups and the influence of covariates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received ethical approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of all participating centres. The results could provide valuable insights into changes in participatory outcomes of people with severe-to-profound hearing loss after CI. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and professional and patient organisation meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05525221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo G B Nijmeijer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wendy J Huinck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sophia E Kramer
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Gert Jan van der Wilt
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Emmanuel A M Mylanus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Subasri M, Cressman C, Arje D, Schreyer L, Cooper E, Patel K, Ungar WJ, Barwick M, Denburg A, Hayeems RZ. Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10050897. [PMID: 37238445 DOI: 10.3390/children10050897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Precision health aims to personalize treatment and prevention strategies based on individual genetic differences. While it has significantly improved healthcare for specific patient groups, broader translation faces challenges with evidence development, evidence appraisal, and implementation. These challenges are compounded in child health as existing methods fail to incorporate the physiology and socio-biology unique to childhood. This scoping review synthesizes the existing literature on evidence development, appraisal, prioritization, and implementation of precision child health. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched. The included articles were related to pediatrics, precision health, and the translational pathway. Articles were excluded if they were too narrow in scope. In total, 74 articles identified challenges and solutions for putting pediatric precision health interventions into practice. The literature reinforced the unique attributes of children and their implications for study design and identified major themes for the value assessment of precision health interventions for children, including clinical benefit, cost-effectiveness, stakeholder values and preferences, and ethics and equity. Tackling these identified challenges will require developing international data networks and guidelines, re-thinking methods for value assessment, and broadening stakeholder support for the effective implementation of precision health within healthcare organizations. This research was funded by the SickKids Precision Child Health Catalyst Grant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathushan Subasri
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Celine Cressman
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Danielle Arje
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Leighton Schreyer
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Erin Cooper
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Komal Patel
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Melanie Barwick
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Avram Denburg
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kirwin EM, Round JA, Bond K, McCabe CJ. Author Reply. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:614-616. [PMID: 36764516 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Kirwin
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Health Organisation, Policy, and Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.
| | - Jeff A Round
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ken Bond
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher J McCabe
- Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pham TH, van der Schans J. A Conceptual Framework for Life-Cycle Health Technology Assessment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:612-613. [PMID: 36773781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thi Hao Pham
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Asc Academics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurjen van der Schans
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Management Sciences, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thokala P, Srivastava T, Smith R, Ren S, Whittington MD, Elvidge J, Wong R, Uttley L. Living Health Technology Assessment: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:227-237. [PMID: 36652184 PMCID: PMC9848020 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01229-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Health technology assessments (HTAs) are typically performed as one-off evaluations and can potentially become out-of-date due to the availability of new data, new comparators, or other factors. Recently, living approaches have been applied to systematic reviews and network meta-analyses to enable evidence syntheses to be updated more easily. In this paper, we provide a definition for 'Living HTA' where such a living approach could be applied to the entire HTA process. Living HTA could involve performing regular or scheduled updates using a traditional manual approach, or indeed in a semi-automated manner leveraging recent technological innovations that automate parts of the HTA process. The practical implementation of living HTA using both approaches (i.e., manual approach and using semi-automation) is described along with the likely issues and challenges with planning and implementing a living HTA process. The time, resources and additional considerations outlined may prohibit living HTA from becoming the norm for every evaluation; however, scenarios where living HTA would be particularly beneficial are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Thokala
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Tushar Srivastava
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- ConnectHEOR Ltd, London, UK
| | - Robert Smith
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- Dark Peak Analytics Ltd, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shijie Ren
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Jamie Elvidge
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Lesley Uttley
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Health technology assessment 2025 and beyond: lifecycle approaches to promote engagement and efficiency in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e15. [PMID: 36815310 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323000090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Lifecycle considerations have always been part of health technology assessment (HTA). However, the concept of taking a fuller, more holistic "lifecycle approach" is gaining interest in the HTA community. The 2022 HTAi Global Policy Forum (GPF) discussed how adopting a lifecycle approach could promote stakeholder engagement and robust evidence generation, and whether it could enhance information sharing and transparency across stakeholder groups. This article summarizes the discussions held at the 2022 HTAi GPF and subsequent HTAi Annual Meeting panel session that debated some of the key challenges and opportunities, with particular focus on the pre- and postmarket and disinvestment phase activities. Core themes and recommendations identified that collaboration and patient involvement are happening but still needs to be strengthened, and moving to disease-based approaches may help, although individual contexts still need to be considered. Appropriately developed and mandated core outcome sets may help with information sharing and efficiency in all lifecycle activities. Further, methods for the appropriate use of big data and digital data collection should be developed and driven by the HTA community. The value of lifecycle activities should be reviewed; in particular, scientific advice appears valuable, but the magnitude of effect is somewhat unknown due to the challenges around the confidential nature of these activities. Not all lifecycle activities can be conducted for every technology, and while there is a move away from disinvestment phase activities, more structured prioritization criteria are required. This article ends with suggested next steps to bring forward some of the priority recommendations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Husereau D, Steuten L, Muthu V, Thomas DM, Spinner DS, Ivany C, Mengel M, Sheffield B, Yip S, Jacobs P, Sullivan T. Effective and Efficient Delivery of Genome-Based Testing-What Conditions Are Necessary for Health System Readiness? Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10102086. [PMID: 36292532 PMCID: PMC9602865 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10102086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Health systems internationally must prepare for a future of genetic/genomic testing to inform healthcare decision-making while creating research opportunities. High functioning testing services will require additional considerations and health system conditions beyond traditional diagnostic testing. Based on a literature review of good practices, key informant interviews, and expert discussion, this article attempts to synthesize what conditions are necessary, and what good practice may look like. It is intended to aid policymakers and others designing future systems of genome-based care and care prevention. These conditions include creating communities of practice and healthcare system networks; resource planning; across-region informatics; having a clear entry/exit point for innovation; evaluative function(s); concentrated or coordinated service models; mechanisms for awareness and care navigation; integrating innovation and healthcare delivery functions; and revisiting approaches to financing, education and training, regulation, and data privacy and security. The list of conditions we propose was developed with an emphasis on describing conditions that would be applicable to any healthcare system, regardless of capacity, organizational structure, financing, population characteristics, standardization of care processes, or underlying culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Don Husereau
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1G 5Z3, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-6132994379
| | - Lotte Steuten
- Office of Health Economics, London SE1 2HB, UK
- City Health Economics Centre (CHEC), City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Vivek Muthu
- Marivek Healthcare Consulting, Epsom KT18 7PF, UK
| | - David M. Thomas
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- Omico, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Daryl S. Spinner
- Menarini Silicon Biosystems Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006, USA
| | - Craig Ivany
- Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
| | | | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada
| | - Philip Jacobs
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Terrence Sullivan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gamessa TW, Abebe ST, Abate LD, Abo MK, Mekonnen AA, Tadesse ZK, Woyesa AF, Obse RB, Ibrahim MA, Simegn GL. Planning and Budgeting of Medical Devices Among Ethiopian Public Hospitals. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 14:405-413. [PMID: 35615660 PMCID: PMC9126157 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s363376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Planning and budgeting of medical devices allow a healthcare institution to properly use funds, acquire quality and efficient medical devices, and improve healthcare service delivery. The lack of proper policy in the procurement and management of medical devices causes inappropriate usage of funds and impedes the quality of a product. This study aimed to identify the current practices and gaps in the planning and budgeting of medical devices in Ethiopian public hospitals. In this study, an assessment was conducted in all regional public hospitals to assess the current status of medical device management, identify the gaps, and provide suggestions for areas of improvement. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for the study assessment where a structured data collection tool was utilized to collect data. A multi-stage stratified random sampling proportionate to size technique was employed for the sampling of public hospitals in all regions of Ethiopia. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 26 software. Results The availability of medical equipment development plans, budgeting, and spare parts procurement plans were found to be below 50% in public hospitals. It was also noted that 40.3% of hospitals do not prepare medical device technical specifications during procurement orders. Moreover, the engagement of biomedical engineers/technicians in the planning and procurement of medical devices was found to be below 50%. Conclusion This assessment showed that there is a need for improvement in the development of procurement plans and preparation of technical specifications for medical devices in Ethiopian public hospitals. Developing policies and strategies for the proper use of funds in the procurement of medical devices, involving biomedical engineering professionals in the planning, procurement and use of medical devices could help to improve the quality, optimized utilization and efficiency of medical devices and ultimately enhance healthcare service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadesse Waktola Gamessa
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Correspondence: Tadesse Waktola Gamessa, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Tel +251910201915, Email
| | - Samuel Tadesse Abebe
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Lemlem Degafu Abate
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Megersa Kebede Abo
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Alemu Abibi Mekonnen
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Zerihun Ketema Tadesse
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Addisu Fayera Woyesa
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Regasa Bayisa Obse
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mahdi Abdella Ibrahim
- Pharmaceticals and Medical Equipment Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | |
Collapse
|