Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Lenacapavir Plus Optimized Background Regimen Versus Other Treatments for Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Lenacapavir: Patient and healthcare provider perceptions and the potential role for a twice-yearly injectable HIV treatment

BACKGROUND

The twice-yearly, long-acting lenacapavir (LA LEN) antiretroviral therapy (ART), when combined with an optimised background regimen, provides a subcutaneous injectable treatment option for people with HIV. This study aimed to understand the preferences, barriers and facilitators for uptake and implementation of LA LEN, with a view to informing clinical implementation.

METHODS

In-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups with purposively sampled people with HIV and healthcare workers (HCWs) from UK HIV services were conducted. Transcripts were analysed using summative and conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four people with HIV with varied ART experience were recruited from two HIV services. Participants included 22 (65%) identifying as cisgender men and 12 (35%) identifying as cisgender women; median age was 55 years (range 26-76 years). Fourteen HIV HCWs took part in three focus groups. Four key themes and 12 subthemes were identified: LA LEN as a treatment option; LA LEN versus oral ART; switching considerations; and administration of LA LEN. The majority (88%) of people with HIV were interested in switching to LA LEN if offered. Preference was markedly reduced if an oral ART pairing was required. Convenience of the dosing schedule, reduced pill burden and issues around stigma were reasons for interest in LA LEN, but concerns regarding efficacy, dosing interval windows, monitoring and side effects were described. HCWs felt the benefit of LA LEN was as a treatment option for those with adherence issues, drug resistance and a high pill burden. Broader use of LA LEN raised concerns over drug resistance, delivery capacity and storage.

CONCLUSIONS

LA LEN was viewed as a preferable treatment choice for many people with HIV, provided an all-injectable regimen was available. Feasibility assessments for provision of injectable ART and research on its potential for self-administration are needed.

Effective management of multidrug-resistant HIV with lenacapavir and fostemsavir: A case study

Resistance to antiretroviral therapy is an increasing challenge in the management of HIV. We present the case of a woman living with HIV, with a history of multiple treatment regimens and resistances to antiretrovirals, who has been successfully treated with a combination of lenacapavir and fostemsavir for the past year, obtaining an undetectable viral load within one month of starting therapy and reporting no serious side effects. This case is amongst the first to document the combined use of lenacapivir and fostemsavir in treating multidrug-resistant HIV. It supports the potential of these novel agents in managing complex cases of HIV resistance.

US cost-utility model of lenacapavir plus optimized background regimen (OBR) vs fostemsavir plus OBR and ibalizumab plus OBR for people with HIV with multidrug resistance

BACKGROUND

Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH) have limited treatment options owing to multidrug resistance (MDR). Lenacapavir (LEN) is indicated, in combination with other antiretrovirals, for the treatment of adults with MDR HIV-1 experiencing failure of their current antiretroviral regimen because of resistance, intolerance, or safety considerations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-utility of LEN in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR) vs alternative recently approved treatments for HTE PWH, fostemsavir (FTR)+OBR and ibalizumab (IBA)+OBR, for the treatment of PWH with MDR, from a mixed US health care payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition model with a lifetime time horizon was developed. Transition probabilities between viral load categories were based on individual participant data from the CAPELLA trial for LEN+OBR and on relative efficacy parameters obtained from indirect treatment comparisons for comparators. Health state utilities were sourced from the literature. Costs included drug acquisition costs, drug administration costs, disease management costs, adverse event costs, AIDS-related event costs, and treatment switching costs and were sourced from red book costs, Medicare and Medicaid fees, and the literature. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. The model was used to estimate total and incremental costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A deterministic and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, as well as scenario analyses, were performed to address elements of uncertainty in the model and to explore the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime time horizon, LEN+OBR was associated with the highest absolute QALYs (9.41) and the greatest number of LYs (12.09) compared with FTR+OBR (QALYs: 8.75; LYs: 11.26) and IBA+OBR (QALYs: 8.36; LYs: 10.78). LEN+OBR was also associated with the lowest total lifetime costs of the 3 interventions (LEN+OBR: $1,441,122 [US dollars]; FTR+OBR: $1,504,986; IBA+OBR: $1,524,396) and therefore was dominant over both comparators in the base case. LEN+OBR remained dominant vs FTR+OBR and IBA+OBR across the range of scenarios tested and LEN+OBR had a 99% probability of being cost-effective compared with FTR+OBR and IBA+OBR in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

This economic evaluation demonstrated that LEN+OBR provides meaningful increases in QALYs and LYs, and is dominant over a lifetime time horizon, compared with FTR+OBR and IBA+OBR for the treatment of PWH with MDR in the United States.

Lenacapavir: A Novel Long-Acting Capsid Inhibitor for HIV

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy, safety, and role of lenacapavir (LEN) in the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (through March 2023) with the search term LEN and GS-6207. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, the manufacturer's Web site, and prescribing information.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant articles, trial updates, and conference abstracts in the English language were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lenacapavir represents a new class of antiretrovirals (ARVs) with a novel mechanism of action as a capsid inhibitor and a unique twice-a-year subcutaneous administration schedule. Lenacapavir when combined with other ARVs has proven to benefit heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) patients with HIV-1 infection in achieving viral suppression and immune restoration.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

Lenacapavir is a new treatment option that patients who are HTE can consider adding as part of an ARV regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenacapavir is an effective and well-tolerated option for HTE patients which is a valuable addition to the arsenal of ARVs.

Lenacapavir with Fostemsavir in a Multidrug-Resistant HIV-Infected Hemodialysis Patient

We report a hemodialysis MDR HIV-infected patient switched to fostemsavir with lenacapavir plus lamivudine for more than a year. She maintained a suppressed viral replication and did not present any clinical or biological drug-related side effects. The combination of lenacapavir plus fostemsavir looks promising in terms of safety and efficacy even in patients with end-stage renal disease awaiting renal transplant. Both drugs are first in class ARVs so that there is no cross resistance with previous drugs, maintaining their efficacy against MDR HIV.

Highlights on the Development, Related Patents, and Prospects of Lenacapavir: The First-in-Class HIV-1 Capsid Inhibitor for the Treatment of Multi-Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection

The multidrug-resistant (MDR) human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection is an unmet medical need. HIV-1 capsid plays an important role at different stages of the HIV-1 replication cycle and is an attractive drug target for developing therapies against MDR HIV-1 infection. Lenacapavir (LEN) is the first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor approved by the USFDA, EMA, and Health Canada for treating MDR HIV-1 infection. This article highlights the development, pharmaceutical aspects, clinical studies, patent literature, and future directions on LEN-based therapies. The literature for this review was collected from PubMed, authentic websites (USFDA, EMA, Health Canada, Gilead, and NIH), and the free patent database (Espacenet, USPTO, and Patent scope). LEN has been developed by Gilead and is marketed as Sunlenca (tablet and subcutaneous injection). The long-acting and patient-compliant LEN demonstrated a low level of drug-related mutations, is active against MDR HIV-1 infection, and does not reveal cross-resistance to other anti-HIV drugs. LEN is also an excellent drug for patients having difficult or limited access to healthcare facilities. The literature has established additive/synergistic effects of combining LEN with rilpivirine, cabotegravir, islatravir, bictegravir, and tenofovir. HIV-1 infection may be accompanied by opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis (TB). The associated diseases make HIV treatment complex and warrant drug interaction studies (drug-drug, drug-food, and drug-disease interaction). Many inventions on different aspects of LEN have been claimed in patent literature. However, there is a great scope for developing more inventions related to the drug combination of LEN with anti-HIV/anti-TB drugs in a single dosage form, new formulations, and methods of treating HIV and TB co-infection. Additional research may provide more LEN-based treatments with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters for MDR HIV-1 infections and associated opportunistic infections such as TB.