Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using cisplatin powder mixed with degradable starch microspheres for colorectal liver metastases after FOLFOX failure: results of a phase I/II study

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines

The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.

Prospective Series of Transarterial Chemoembolization of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver with 30-60 μm Microspheres Loaded with Irinotecan

PURPOSE

To describe safety and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to the liver treated with transarterial chemoembolization with HepaSphere™ Microspheres 30-60 μm loaded with irinotecan (ΙRI-HEP-TACE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study (NCT04866290), 100 adults with confirmed mCRC to the liver who were ineligible for resection were enrolled and followed up to 24 months or death. Study outcomes among Salvage (patients not tolerating more cycles of chemotherapy) and Non-salvage patients included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), objective response rate (ORR), best tumor response (BTR), adverse events (AEs), and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN38).

RESULTS

The median age was 66 years (range: 31-89). Median OS was 15.08 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.33-17.25). PFS was 8.52 months (95% CI: 6.0-9.0; p < 0.001). ORR was 42.2% (95% CI: 31.57-53.50) and 35.9% (95% CI: 25.57-47.62) based on modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and RECIST 1.1 criteria. BTR was not significantly different between mRECIST and RECIST (p = 0.745). The Non-salvage group had a statistically significant difference in median OS relative to the Salvage group (15.3 vs. 3 months; p < 0.001). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated no correlation of OS with plasma concentration of irinotecan and SN38 (all p > 0.05). Most AEs were Grade 2 (257/279), the most common AE was right upper abdominal pain (180/279). One major AE (tumor rupture) was reported.

CONCLUSION

IRI-HEP-TACE is an alternative treatment for patients with Non-salvage mCRC to the liver.

Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases

Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.

The Role of Conventional TACE (cTACE) and DEBIRI-TACE in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumor entities worldwide and a common cause of cancer-associated death. Colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) thereby constitute a severe life-limiting factor. The therapy of CRLM presents a major challenge and surgical resection as well as systemic chemotherapy remain the first-line treatment options. Over the years several locoregional, vascular- and image-based treatments offered by interventional radiologists have emerged when conventional therapies fail, or metastases recurrence occurs. Among such options is the conventional/traditional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) by local injection of a combination of chemotherapeutic- and embolic-agents. A similar treatment is the more recent irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads TACE (DEBIRI-TACE), which are administered using the same approach. Numerous studies have shown that these different types of chemoembolization can be applied in different clinical settings safely. Furthermore, such treatments can also be combined with other local or systemic therapies. Unfortunately, due to the incoherent patient populations of studies investigating TACE in CRLM, critics state that the definite evidence supporting positive patient outcomes is still lacking. In the following article we review studies on conventional and DEBIRI-TACE. Although highly dependent on the clinical setting, prior therapies and generally the study population, cTACE and DEBIRI-TACE show comparable results. We present the most representative studies on the different chemoembolization procedures and compare the results. Although there is compelling evidence for both approaches, further studies are necessary to determine which patients profit most from these therapies. In conclusion, we determine TACE to be a viable option in CRLM in different clinical settings. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary approach is desired to offer patients the best possible care.

Intra-arterial therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting embolic trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A search was conducted on EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for prospective non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 20^th June 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SR), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), while two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RR) and conversion-to-resection rates (CRR).

RESULTS

71 prospective non-randomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond first line, DEE-TACE+SCT (n=152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95%-CI: 22.5-29.1) months and 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95%-CI: 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE+SCT appears to consistently have the highest pooled survival rates at 1-year (81.9%) and 2-years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE+SCT and HAI+SCT had the highest pooled-RRs of 56.7% (I²=0.90) and 62.6% (I²=0.87) respectively and pooled-CRRs of 35.5% (I²=0.00) and 30.3% (I²=0.80) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Albeit significant heterogeneity, paucity of high-quality evidence and the non-comparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE+SCT may have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.

Efficacy of a Glass Membrane Emulsification Device to Form Mixture of Cisplatin Powder with Lipiodol on Transarterial Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To examine physiochemical characteristics and drug release properties of cisplatin powder and lipiodol mixtures formed by a glass membrane emulsification device compared with a 3-way stopcock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven different types of mixtures were evaluated: cisplatin powder and lipiodol directly mixed (suspension), complete cisplatin solution and lipiodol mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (emulsion), incomplete cisplatin solution and lipiodol mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (solid-in-water emulsion), and contrast material and cisplatin suspension mixed by a 3-way stopcock or the device (solid-in-oil emulsion).

RESULT

The percentages of water-in-oil were 98.08 ± 0.27% in the emulsion formed by the device, while 70.3 ± 4.63% in the emulsion formed by a 3-way stopcock (P = 0.037). Solid-in-water and solid-in-oil emulsions formed by the device showed 98.09 ± 0.38% and 98.70 ± 0.40% of water-in-oil, respectively, whereas both solid-in-water and solid-in-oil emulsions formed by a 3-way stopcock showed 0.00%. Homogenous droplet sizes were shown by using the device. The half release times of cisplatin in the emulsions formed by the device were 197 ± 19, 244 ± 24 and 478 ± 52 min, respectively, which were significantly longer than the emulsion formed by a 3-way stopcock of 8 ± 8 min (P = 0.046-0.050). Suspension showed the longest release time; however, the viscosity was lowest.

CONCLUSION

The glass membrane emulsification device formed almost 100% water-in-oil, whereas 3-way stopcock produced 100% oil-in-water when incomplete solution or suspension was mixed. Slower cisplatin release was shown in the emulsions formed by the device.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was published in 2016, identifying both a more strategic approach to the administration of the available systemic therapy choices, and a greater emphasis on the use of ablative techniques, including surgery. At the 2016 ESMO Asia Meeting, in December 2016, it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting, endorsed by both ESMO and JSMO, immediately after the JSMO 2017 Annual Meeting. The aim was to adapt the ESMO consensus guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences relating to the toxicity as well as other aspects of certain systemic treatments in patients of Asian ethnicity. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with mCRC identified by the Presidents of the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology), Korea (Korean Association for Clinical Oncology), Malaysia (Malaysian Oncological Society), Singapore (Singapore Society of Oncology) and Taiwan (Taiwan Oncology Society). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

Development of Repeatable Microcatheter Access Port for Intra-arterial Therapy of Liver Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop an implantable port in which a microcatheter can be inserted for a combination therapy of repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced liver cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The design of a currently used implantable port was modified. A funnel part was constructed in the port. The septum was punctured by a 20-gauge indwelling needle, and 2.0-Fr non-tapered microcatheter was inserted into the port. In the in vitro studies, the advance of a microcatheter out of the funnel part was evaluated via seven different septum puncture sites. A 5-Fr indwelling catheter connected to the port was placed in a vascular model, and a microcatheter catheterization was evaluated. In an in vivo study, the port-catheter system was implanted in the hepatic artery in a pig. A microcatheter was percutaneously inserted through the port into the hepatic arterial branches, and embolization was performed.

RESULTS

In the in vitro studies, the microcatheter was smoothly advanced out of the port and catheterizations into the hepatic arteries were successful via all septum puncture sites. In the in vivo study, repeated selective embolization through the port was successfully conducted on 7, 14 and 21 days after the implantation.

CONCLUSION

The developed implantable port can be used for repeated catheter insertion into the hepatic artery. The combination of repeated TACE and HAIC could be possible using this device.

Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization with Degradable Starch Microspheres (DSMs-TACE) of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to: a) evaluate tumor response rates using modified-Response-evaluation-criteria-in-solid-tumors (mRecist) criteria, b) evaluate safety of Degradable Starch Microspheres Trans-arterial-chemo-embolization (DSMs-TACE) for unresectable hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 24 HCC cirrhotic patients (21/3 M/F, mean age 66.3 years) to be treated with repeated DSMs-TACE procedures, performed at 4-6 week intervals on the basis of tumor response and patients tolerance. Clinical and biochemical evaluations were performed before and after each procedure. Treatment response was also assessed by Computed-tomography (CT) or Magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-scan 4-6 weeks following each procedure.

RESULTS

In our experience, DSMs-TACE was both safe and effective. A total of 53 DSMs-TACE procedures were performed (2.2 per patient). No procedure-related death was observed. Complete Response (CR) was observed in 5/24 (20.8%), 4/17 (23.5%) and 5/12 (41.6%) patients after the first, second and third procedure, respectively. At the end of each treatment, all patients experienced at least a partial response. At the end of the repeated procedures, no differences between mono- or bi-lobar disease were observed in patients with CR (64.2% vs 50%; p=ns). In most cases, treatment discontinuation was due to worsening liver function.

CONCLUSION

DSMs-TACE is a valid, well-tolerated alternative treatment to Lipiodol-TACE or DEB-TACE, as it has demonstrated to achieve a relatively high percentage of complete tumor necrosis. CR rates were similar between patients with mono- or bi-lobar disease indicating the possibility of carrying-out repeated procedure in a safe and effective way in both types of patients.

Survival of patients with non-resectable, chemotherapy-resistant colorectal cancer liver metastases undergoing conventional lipiodol-based transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) palliatively versus neoadjuvantly prior to percutaneous thermal ablation

PURPOSE

To determine overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for cTACE alone and in combination with percutaneous thermal ablation in patients with non-resectable, chemotherapy-resistant colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 452 patients undergoing 2654 repetitive cTACE treatments of CRLM. 233 patients were treated palliatively using only cTACE, whereas 219 patients were treated with cTACE in a neoadjuvant intend with subsequent thermal ablation (either microwave ablation or laser-induced thermotherapy). The chemotherapeutics agents used, in either single-, double-, or triple-combinations, included MitomycinC, Gemcitabine, Irinotecan, and Cisplatin. Several factors were analysed to determine their prognostic value in terms of OS and PFS.

RESULTS

Palliative use of cTACE resulted in a median OS and PFS of 12.6 and 5.9 months, whereas the neoadjuvant use of cTACE showed a median OS and PFS of 25.8 and 10.8 months. The differences in OS and PFS between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Extrahepatic metastases were a significant prognostic factor in the OS and PFS analysis of the palliative and neoadjuvant group. In addition, number, location, and mean size of metastases were significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS in the neoadjuvant group. Sex, primary tumor location, T- and N-parameters of the TNM staging system, time of liver metastases appearance, ablation method, and patient age did not significantly impact OS and PFS in either patient group. The most distinct response to cTACE was observed in metastases that were treated with a triple-combination of chemotherapeutics (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

cTACE is an effective treatment option in advanced non-resectable CRLM. Chemoembolization followed by ablation further increases survival rates. A triple combination of chemotherapeutics improves response to cTACE.

Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE) in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of degradable starch microspheres (DSM) as embolic agents in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of secondary liver metastases.

Methods

This was a national, multicenter observational study. Primary endpoints were safety and treatment response according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria.

Results

A total of 77 DSM-TACE procedures were performed in 20 patients. Minor immediate adverse events (AEs) were epigastric pain with an incidence of 45.5% (35/77), and nausea and vomiting at an incidence of 23.4% (18/77). Delayed minor AEs were epigastric pain in 13/77 (16.9%) treatments and nausea and vomiting in 10 (13.0%) treatments. No severe AEs were documented. Therapeutic efficacy of DSM-TACE procedures according to mRECIST was as follows: complete response 0/77, partial response 17/77, stable disease 33/77 and progressive disease 6/77, no data was available for 21/77 treatments. Overall, objective response was achieved in 8 of 20 patients (40.0%).

Conclusion

DSM as embolic agent for TACE is safe in the treatment of liver metastases. An objective response in 40.0% of patients and disease control in 64.9% of procedures was achieved, and this should lead to further evaluation of DSM-TACE as treatment option for nonresectable liver metastases.

Predisposing factors for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following initial remission after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prone to recurrence following curative treatment. The purpose of the present study was to identify the predisposing factors of HCC recurrence following complete remission achieved by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). A retrospective cohort study of 70 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent TACE as the initial treatment was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups according to their 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) status; the early recurrence group (ER group; n=32), with HCC recurring within 1 year of initial TACE; and the non-early recurrence group (NER group; n=38), who did not experience recurrence within 1 year. The parameters identified as significantly associated with DFS time on univariate analysis were aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase and α-fetoprotein levels, as well as the tumor number (P=0.003, P=0.027, P=0.002 and P=0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that AST levels and tumor number were significantly associated with a shorter DFS period (P=0.009 and P=0.038, respectively). The Mantel-Haenszel test revealed a significant trend of decreasing DFS with increasing tumor number. Among the patients with HCC in the ER group, locoregional recurrence occurred more frequently in those who received TACE alone compared with those treated with TACE combined with radiofrequency ablation treatment. In summary, multinodularity of HCC is the most potent predictive factor for the recurrence of HCC within 1 year of initial TACE.

Transarterial Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Until recently, hepatic arterial therapies (HAT) had been used for colorectal liver metastases after failure of first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapies. HAT has gained greater acceptance in patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases after failure of surgery or systemic chemotherapy. The current data demonstrate that HAT is a safe and effective option for preoperative downsizing, optimizing the time to surgery, limiting non-tumor-bearing liver toxicity, and improving overall survival after surgery in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases. The aim of this review is to present the current data for HAT in liver-only and liver-dominant colorectal liver metastases.

Intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of transarterial therapy

According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, the recommended first-line treatment for patients with intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is transarterial chemoembolization. Patients with intermediate stage of HCC represent 20% with a 2-year survival of approximately 50%. Nowadays, transarterial therapies have proved precious in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. During the last years, there were important developments in practiced transarterial therapies and their efficacy is still controversial. The purpose of this review is to discuss in further details these transarterial therapies that have been used to treat cases of HCC.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for colorectal liver metastases--current status and critical review

BACKGROUND

Transarterial liver-directed therapies are currently not recommended as a standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), however, is increasingly used for patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases after failure of surgery or systemic chemotherapy. The limited available data potentially reveals TACE as a valuable option for pre- and post-operative downsizing, minimizing time-to-surgery, and prolongation of overall survival after surgery in patients with colorectal liver only metastases.

PURPOSE

In this overview, the current status of TACE for the treatment of liver-dominant colorectal liver metastases is presented. Critical comments on its rationale, technical success, complications, toxicity, and side effects as well as oncologic outcomes are discussed. The role of TACE as a valuable adjunct to surgery is addressed regarding pre- and post-operative downsizing, conversion to resectability as well as improvement of the recurrence rate after potentially curative liver resection. Additionally, the concept of TACE for liver-dominant metastatic disease with a focus on new embolization technologies is outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

There is encouraging data with regard to technical success, safety, and oncologic efficacy of TACE for colorectal liver metastases. The majority of studies are non-randomized single-center series mostly after failure of systemic therapies in the 2nd line and beyond. Emerging techniques including embolization with calibrated microspheres, with or without additional cytotoxic drugs, degradable starch microspheres, and technical innovations, e.g., cone-beam computed tomography (CT) allow a new highly standardized TACE procedure. The real efficacy of TACE for colorectal liver metastases in a neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative setting has now to be evaluated in prospective randomized controlled trials.

(90)Y-glass microspheres for hepatic neoplasia

Unresectable liver cancer presents a major problem in the treatment of solid tumors. Transarterial radioembolization is a modern approach toward primary and secondary liver malignancies. The mechanism of action is independent from other therapies that are based on ischemia or chemotoxicity. (90)Y-resin and (90)Y-glass microspheres are commercially available for transarterial radioembolization. Available data on the use of (90)Y-glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic disease indicate that this treatment is safe and effective. In hepatocellular carcinoma the results compare well with chemoembolization and might be considered more often. Current data in metastatic disease are promising, but there is a strong need for prospective randomized trials to identify the role of transarterial radioembolization with (90)Y-glass microspheres in metastatic liver disease.

Is yttrium-90 radioembolization a viable treatment option for unresectable, chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases? A large single-center experience of 302 patients

INTRODUCTION

We report the largest series to date on the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable, chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).

METHODS

A total of 302 patients underwent resin-based 90Y radioembolization for unresectable, chemorefractory CRCLM between 2006 and 2013 in Sydney, Australia. All patients were followed up with imaging studies at regular intervals until death. Radiologic response was evaluated with the response criteria in solid tumors criteria. Clinical toxicities were prospectively recorded. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and potential prognostic variables were identified on univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up in the complete cohort was 7.2 months (range 0.2-72.8), and the median survival after 90Y radioembolization was 10.5 months with a 24-month survival of 21%. On imaging follow-up of 293 patients who were followed up beyond 2 months, complete response to treatment was observed in 2 patients (1%), partial response in 111 (38%), stable disease in 96 (33%), and progressive disease in 84 (29%). Four factors were independently associated with a poorer prognosis: extensive tumor volume, number of previous lines of chemotherapy, poor radiological response to treatment, and low preoperative hemoglobin. One hundred fifteen (38%) developed clinical toxicity after treatment; most complications were minor (grade I/II) and resolved without active intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

90Y radioembolization is a safe and effective treatment for unresectable, chemorefractory CRCLM.

Temporary arterial embolization of liver parenchyma with degradable starch microspheres (EmboCept®S) in a swine model

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the embolic properties, time to reperfusion, and histologic changes in temporary embolization of liver tissue with degradable starch microspheres (DSM) in a swine model.

METHODS

In four adult minipigs, DSMs were injected into the right or left hepatic artery on the lobar level until complete stasis of the blood flow was detectable angiographically. The time required to complete angiographically determined reperfusion was noted. The animals were killed 3 h after complete reperfusion, and samples were taken from the liver. Histologic examinations of the embolized liver parenchyma and untreated tissue were performed.

RESULTS

Hepatic arterial embolization using DSMs was technically successful in all cases, with complete blood flow stasis shown by control angiography. A single vial of DSMs (450 mg/7.5 ml) was sufficient to embolize a whole liver lobe in all cases. Angiography showed complete reconstitution of hepatic arterial perfusion after a mean time to reperfusion of 32 ± 6.1 min (range, 26-39 min). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed no histologically detectable differences between untreated tissue and parenchyma embolized with DSMs except for mild sinusoidal congestion in one case. Indirect in situ DNA nick end labeling staining (TUNEL) showed only single positive hepatocytes, indicating apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Temporary embolization of the hepatic artery using DSMs is feasible with complete reperfusion after 30 min in pigs. Even after complete arterial blood flow stasis, no extensive tissue damage to the embolized liver parenchyma was observed at histologic examinations in this short-term study.

New advances in local therapy for colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

SUMMARY 

The liver is the most common site of metastasis from primary colorectal cancer (CRC), and liver metastasis represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with primary CRC. Of patients with metastatic CRC that is confined to the liver, only a minority of patients are candidates for potentially curative surgical resection. In addition, to the very well-established modalities of surgery and thermal ablation, several newer locoregional therapies are available for the treatment of hepatic metastases, including stereotactic body radiotherapy, radioembolization and chemoembolization. Small prospective studies evaluating these treatments show promising response rates and local control in the first-line and salvage settings. Further randomized trials are required for a more rigorous assessment of the benefit and optimal setting in which these therapies should be used in patients with CRC liver metastases.

A systematic review on the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 radioembolization for unresectable, chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

The management of unresectable, chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) is a clinical dilemma. Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization is a potentially safe and effective treatment for patients with CRCLM who have failed conventional chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies before November 2012 was performed to examine the radiological response, overall survival and progression-free survival of patients who underwent Y90 radioembolization of unresectable CRCLM refractory to systemic therapy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety profile of this treatment and identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty studies comprising 979 patients were examined. Patients had failed a median of 3 lines of chemotherapy (range 2-5). After treatment, the average reported value of patients with complete radiological response, partial response and stable disease was 0% (range 0-6%), 31% (range 0-73%) and 40.5% (range 17-76%), respectively. The median time to intra-hepatic progression was 9 months (range 6-16). The median overall survival was 12 months (range 8.3-36). The overall acute toxicity rate ranged from 11 to 100% (median 40.5 %). Most cases of acute toxicity were mild (Grade I or II) (median 39%; range 7-100%) which resolved without intervention. The number of previous lines of chemotherapy (≥ 3), poor radiological response to treatment, extra-hepatic disease and extensive liver disease (≥ 25%) were the factors most commonly associated with poorer overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Y90 radioembolization is a safe and effective treatment of CRCLM in the salvage setting and should be more widely utilized.

Current role of transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

In this article, we review two liver-directed therapies that are currently used for the palliative treatment of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), including a new type of TACE with drug-eluting beads, and radioembolization. Important developments and administration techniques for all therapies are discussed, as well as their integration into the current routine clinical care for management of metastatic colorectal cancer. According to published data from clinical trials, as presented in this review, both radioembolization and TACE/TACE with drug-eluting beads have been proven to be safe and effective in selected patients with chemorefractory liver metastases from colorectal cancer. For patients with unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant disease who have failed standard chemotherapy options or for whom chemotherapy is contraindicated, new modalities, such as those discussed, are particularly valid and promising if clinical guidelines for patient selection and treatment administration are followed.

Review of the impact of antineoplastic therapies on the risk for cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Development of cholecystitis in patients with malignancies can potentially disrupt their treatment and alter prognosis. This review aims to identify antineoplastic interventions associated with increased risk of cholecystitis in cancer patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was developed to identify articles pertaining to risk factors and complications of cholecystitis in cancer patients. FDA-issued labels of novel antineoplastic drugs released after 2010 were hand-searched to identify more therapies associated with cholecystitis in nonpublished studies.

RESULTS

Of an initial 2,932 articles, 124 were reviewed in the study. Postgastrectomy patients have a high (5-30 %) incidence of gallstone disease, and 1-7 % develop symptomatic disease. One randomized trial addressing the role of cholecystectomy concurrent with gastrectomy is currently underway. Among other risk groups, patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogs have a 15 % risk of cholelithiasis, and most are symptomatic. Hepatic artery based therapies carry a risk of cholecystitis (0.02-24 %), although the risk is reduced with selective catheterization. Myelosuppression related to chemotherapeutic agents (0.4 %), bone marrow transplantation, and treatment with novel multikinase inhibitors are associated with high risk of cholecystitis.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several risk factors for gallbladder-related surgical emergencies in patients with advanced malignancies. Incidental cholecystectomy at index operation should be considered in patients planned for gastrectomy, and candidates for regional therapies to the liver or somatostatin analogs. While prophylactic cholecystectomy is currently recommended for patients with cholelithiasis receiving myeloablative therapy, this strategy may have value in patients treated with multikinase inhibitors, immunotherapy, and oncolytic viral therapy based on evolving evidence.