1
|
Franzè MS, Vigneron P, Sessa A, Saitta C, Chalaye J, Tacher V, Luciani A, Regnault H, Bejan A, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Leroy V, Brustia R, Raimondo G, Amaddeo G. Prognostic factors influencing outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy. Ann Hepatol 2024; 30:101539. [PMID: 39179159 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has emerged as a viable endovascular treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, SIRT is currently recommended for early- and intermediate-stage HCC that is unsuitable for alternative locoregional therapies. Additionally, SIRT remains a recommended treatment for patients with advanced-stage HCC and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) without extrahepatic metastasis. Several studies have shown that SIRT is a versatile and promising treatment with a wide range of applications. Consequently, given its favourable characteristics in various scenarios, SIRT could be an encouraging treatment option for patients with HCC across different BCLC stages. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have focused on better understanding the prognostic factors associated with SIRT to identify patients who derive the most benefit from this treatment or to refine the optimal technical procedures of SIRT. Several variables can influence treatment decisions, with a growing emphasis on a personalised approach. This review, based on the literature, will focus on the prognostic factors associated with the effectiveness of radioembolization and related complications. By comprehensively analysing these factors, we aimed to provide a clearer understanding of how to optimise the use of SIRT in managing HCC patients, thereby enhancing outcomes across various clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Franzè
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paul Vigneron
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Anna Sessa
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Carlo Saitta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Julia Chalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Hélène Regnault
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Ancuta Bejan
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Leroy
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu Q, Ungchusri E, Pillai A, Liao CY, Baker T, Fung J, DiSabato D, Zhang M, Liao C, Van Ha T, Ahmed O. Selective internal radiation therapy using yttrium-90 microspheres for treatment of localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:2374-2383. [PMID: 37812295 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10203-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate safety and effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 for localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients with localized iCCA treated with SIRT at a single institution. Overall survival (OS), local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were collected. Stratified analysis was performed based on surgical resection. Predictor analysis of OS was performed using the Fine-Grey regression analysis model with patients bridged to surgery regarded as competing events. RESULTS A total of 28 consecutive patients with localized iCCA were treated with a total of 38 sessions of SIRT (17 segmental, 13 lobar, and 8 combined deliveries) and a mean dominant target dose per session of 238.4 ± 130.0 Gy. The cumulative radiologic response rate was 16/28 (57.1%) with a median PFS of 265 days. Median survival time (MST) was 22.9 months for the entire cohort with 1-year and 3-year survival of 78.4% and 45.1%, respectively. Ten patients (34.5%) were downstaged to surgical intervention (7 resection, 3 transplant) and showed longer OS (p = 0.027). The 1-year and 3-year OS for patients who received surgery were 100% and 62.5% (95% CI: 14.2-89.3%), respectively. Age (p = 0.028), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.030), and objective radiologic response (p=0.014) are associated with OS. Two ≥grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, and one pleuro-biliary fistula occurred post-SIRT. CONCLUSIONS SIRT for localized iCCA is safe and effective in achieving radiological response, downstaging to surgery and transplant, and resulting in pathologic necrosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Selective internal radiation therapy should be considered for patients with localized and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. KEY POINTS • The effectiveness of radioembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) can be underestimated given the inclusion of extrahepatic disease. • Radioembolization is safe and effective for local and locally advanced iCCA. Age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and radiologic response are associated with survival. • Radioembolization should be considered for patients with localized and locally advanced iCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Chicago, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Ethan Ungchusri
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Chicago, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Medical Center, University of Chicago, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Talia Baker
- Liver Tumor Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - John Fung
- Liver Tumor Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Diego DiSabato
- Liver Tumor Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Mengxue Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Chuanhong Liao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Chicago, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Chicago, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karimi A, Yarmohammadi H, Erinjeri JP. Immune Effects of Intra-Arterial Liver-Directed Therapies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:178-184. [PMID: 38272638 PMCID: PMC11334421 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Image-guided intra-arterial locoregional therapies (LRTs) such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization exhibit effects on the immune system. Understanding the humoral (cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor) and cellular (T cell, neutrophil, dendritic cell, and macrophage) mechanisms underlying the immune effects of LRT is crucial to designing rational and effective combinations of immunotherapy and interventional radiology procedures. This article aims to review the immune effects of intra-arterial LRTs and provide insight into strategies to combine LRTs with systemic immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Karimi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Young S, Rubin N, D'Souza D, Sharma P, Pontolillo J, Flanagan S, Golzarian J, Sanghvi T. Inflammatory Scores: Correlation with Clinical Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Transarterial Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:461-475. [PMID: 35178599 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03080-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the ability of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio (ALRI) and systemic-inflammation index (SII) to predict clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE). MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred forty-five patients who underwent treatment of 167 HCCs had their pretreatment and 1 month post treatment laboratory values evaluated. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local PFS models were performed with patients separated by median inflammatory scores. RESULTS The median pretreatment NLR, PLR, ALRI and SII were 3.0 (range: 0.5-176), 104.4 (range: 25-830), 55.7 (range: 7.5-2090) and 360.2 (range: 51.1-7207.8), respectively. While the median post treatment NLR, PLR, ALRI and SII were 6.2 (range: 0.4-176), 180 (range: 35-2100), 125 (range: 15.9-5710) and 596.8 (range: 28.9-19,320), respectively. OS models showed significant differences when separating the groups by median post treatment NLR (p = 0.003) and SII (p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox regression models for OS with all pre and post treatment inflammatory markers (log-scale) as well as tumor size, AFP and Child-Pugh score showed significant pretreatment NLR [HR: 0.22 (95% CI:0.06-0.75), p = 0.016] and SII [3.52 (95% CI: 1.01-12.3), p = 0.048], as well as post treatment NLR [6.54 (95% CI: 1.57-27.2), p = 0.010] and SII [0.20 (95% CI: 0.05-0.82), p = 0.025] association. The post treatment ALRI (p = 0.010) correlated with PFS while, post treatment NLR (p < 0.001), ALRI (p = 0.024) and SII (p = 0.005) correlated with local PFS. CONCLUSION Pretreatment and post treatment NLR and SII may be associated with OS and post treatment ALRI may be associated with both PFS and local PFS in HCC patients undergoing TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Nathan Rubin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Donna D'Souza
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - John Pontolillo
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Siobhan Flanagan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delware St. SE, MMC 292, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Tina Sanghvi
- Department of Radiology, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mouchli M, Reddy S, Gerrard M, Boardman L, Rubio M. Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic predictor after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma." Review article. Ann Hepatol 2021; 22:100249. [PMID: 32896610 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory marker which has been investigated as a prognostic indicator in post-therapeutic recurrence and survival of patients with HCC. Our aim was to review all studies that assessed the prognostic value of pre-treatment NLR in predicting patient survival, cancer recurrence, and graft survival in patients undergoing various therapies for HCC. We searched the database of PubMed and Google Scholar to review all studies that have the word "NLR" and the word "HCC." We included all studies that assessed pre-treatment NLR as a prognostic factor in predicting outcomes in HCC patients. We excluded studies that assessed the correlation between post-treatment NLR or dynamic changes in NLR after treatment and HCC outcomes in an effort to minimize the confounding effect of each treatment on NLR. We reviewed 123 studies that studied the correlation between pre-treatment NLR and patient survival, 72 studies that evaluated the correlation between pre-treatment NLR and tumor recurrence, 21 studies that evaluated the correlation between NLR and tumor behavior, and 4 studies that assessed the correlation between NLR and graft survival. We found a remarkable heterogeneity between the methods of the studies, which is likely responsible for the differences in outcomes. The majority of the studies suggested a correlation between higher levels of pre-treatment NLR and poor outcomes. We concluded that NLR is a reliable and inexpensive biomarker and should be incorporated into other prognostic models to help determine outcomes following HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Mouchli
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Roanoke, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States; Mayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rochester, MN, United States; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Cleveland, OH, United States.
| | - Shravani Reddy
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Miranda Gerrard
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Lisa Boardman
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Marrieth Rubio
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Roanoke, VA, United States; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sellers CM, Uhlig J, Ludwig JM, Pollak JS, Taddei TH, Stein SM, Lim JK, Kim HS. The effect of chronic viral hepatitis on prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5395-5404. [PMID: 34318618 PMCID: PMC8366096 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammation and the immune system significantly impact the development, progression, and treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study investigated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic biomarker in Western patients with HCC in the setting of chronic viral hepatitis. METHODS Patients diagnosed with HCC from 2005 to 2016 were selected from a tertiary care institution. NLR was calculated within 30 days prior to treatment and dichotomized at the median. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves and Cox hazard proportional models were utilized. Tumor and liver reserve parameters were included in multivariable analyses (MVA). RESULTS A total of 581 patients met inclusion criteria (median age 61.0 yr; 78.3% male; 66.3% Caucasian) with median OS = 34.9 mo. 371 patients (63.9%) had viral hepatitis, of which 350 had hepatitis C (94.3%). The low-NLR group ( CONCLUSIONS Lower baseline NLR was associated with increased overall survival in HCC. Viral hepatitis serves as an effect modifier of NLR, attenuating its prognostic relevance in this hepatitis C-predominant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cortlandt M. Sellers
- Section of Interventional RadiologyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of RadiologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTXUSA
| | - Johannes Uhlig
- Section of Interventional RadiologyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Medical Center GoettingenGoettingenGermany
| | - Johannes M. Ludwig
- Section of Interventional RadiologyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity Hospital EssenUniversity of Duisburg‐EssenEssenGermany
| | - Jeffrey S. Pollak
- Section of Interventional RadiologyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Section of Digestive DiseasesDepartment of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Stacey M. Stein
- Section of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Yale Cancer CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Joseph K. Lim
- Section of Digestive DiseasesDepartment of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Hyun S. Kim
- Section of Interventional RadiologyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Section of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Yale Cancer CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Dynamics in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Radioembolization Using Glass Microspheres. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2624-2634. [PMID: 33438101 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05186-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the prognostic significance of neutrophil and lymphocyte dynamics in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with radioembolization. METHODS A retrospective, single-center review of clinical records and treatment parameters (liver volume treated, administered activity, and radiation dose) in consecutive patients who received radioembolization for HCC was performed between August 20, 2015, and May 24, 2019. Neutrophil and lymphocyte variables associated with overall survival (OS) were determined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and were correlated with radioembolization treatment parameters. Statistical methods included Wilcoxon signed-rank test, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analysis; receiver operating characteristic analysis; and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS One hundred sixty-three patients with a median 67.0 years of age were included for analysis. Eighty-one percent of patients received segmental radioembolization with a median treatment dose of 358 Gray (interquartile range 256-497). The post-treatment lymphocyte count decreased significantly in 94.5 % (p < 0.001) of patients but was not predictive of OS (p = 0.248). The pre-procedure neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLRpre) was not predictive of OS (p = 0.891), and the 1-month post-procedure NLR was a borderline independent predictor of OS (p = 0.05). The NLR ratio (NLRR = NLRpost-procedure/NLRpre) (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% Cl, 1.04-1.66) and change in NLR (ΔNLR= NLRpost-procedure - NLRpre) (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15) were associated with worse OS in BCLC C patients. NLRR (> 3.17) and ΔNLR (> 3.74) were independent predictors when adjusted for tumor presentation, treatment parameters, and liver function. Volume of liver treated and administered activity positively correlated with NLRR and ΔNLR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A decrease in lymphocyte count is common after radioembolization, but of little clinical impact. Neither pre-treatment or post-treatment NLR was a predictor of survival in our study population. NLRR and ΔNLR were independent predictors of survival in BCLC stage C disease and had positive correlations with volume of liver tissue treated and administered activity.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoneoka G, Bozhilov K, Wong LL. Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 6. [PMID: 33134551 PMCID: PMC7597831 DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Inflammation-based markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as primary treatment for HCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of HCC cases (1994–2019) and selected patients who received TARE as primary treatment (n = 42). Laboratory studies were used to calculate NLR and PLR. Response to TARE was determined using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Patients were classified as non-responders (stable or progressive disease) or responders (partial or complete response) to treatment based on mRECIST. Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of ≥ 2.83 and a pre-treatment PLR cutoff of ≥ 83 for predicting non-response to treatment. Pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 was the only significant predictor of non-response to TARE in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.83, P = 0.036). On time to progression analysis, both pre-treatment NLR ≥ 2.83 and pre-treatment PLR ≥ 83 were associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-treatment (43.6% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.014, log-rank) and (38.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.010, log-rank), respectively. Conclusion: NLR confers prognostic value and may be superior to PLR in determining response to TARE as primary treatment for HCC. Future studies are necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Yoneoka
- Transplant Center, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Kliment Bozhilov
- Transplant Center, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Linda L Wong
- Transplant Center, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Suner A, Carr BI. Platelet-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios predict tumor size and survival in HCC patients: Retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 58:167-171. [PMID: 32994979 PMCID: PMC7501491 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inflammation is a recognized concomitant of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its indices are prognostically useful. Aims To evaluate two commonly used inflammatory indices, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to examine their relationship to maximum tumor diameter (MTD) and to survival. Methods A database of 1024 prospectively-accrued HCC patients was examined, who had full baseline tumor parameter data, including CT scan information on HCC size and whose survival was known. Analyses of NLR and PLR were correlated to MDT and to survival. NLR and PLR cutoffs were calculated from receiver operator characteristic curves. Results Every MTD pair had significantly different PLR values, for MTD groups of groups <2/≥2, <3/≥3, <4/≥4, <5/≥5 cm. However there were few significant differences in NLR values. Logistic regression models of different MTD groups likewise showed significance for PLR. Patients with both low NLR and low PLR had the longest overall survival compared to all the other 3 combinations of NLR and PLR. In a Cox regression analysis, univariate models on NLR (≤3.02/>3.02) and PLR (≤6.82/>6.82) groups, showed significance for PLR, p = 0.034 and approaching significance for NLR, p = 0.057. Conclusions MTD pairs down to <2/≥2 cm showed significance for PLR, survival showed significance for PLR and almost for NLR. In HCC studies, there is a need for tumor markers, especially in that 50% of patients who are AFP negative. Most HCCs present at a size that is too large for curative therapies. We evaluated the commonly used NLR and PLR in relation to the smallest detectable HCC tumor size and to survival. We found that PLR is elevated down to resec cm diameter tumors and both NLR and PLR relate to survival. PLR thus has potential for widespread use in HCC prognostication and in screening patients with hepatitis or cirrhosis to identify small and thus potentially curable tumors.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bannaga A, Arasaradnam RP. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and albumin bilirubin grade in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:5022-5049. [PMID: 32952347 PMCID: PMC7476180 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i33.5022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a frequent cause of cancer related death globally. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin bilirubin (ALBI) grade are emerging prognostic indicators in HCC.
AIM To study published literature of NLR and ALBI over the last five years, and to validate NLR and ALBI locally in our centre as indicators of HCC survival.
METHODS A systematic review of the published literature on PubMed of NLR and ALBI in HCC over the last five years. The search followed the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Additionally, we also investigated HCC cases between December 2013 and December 2018 in our centre.
RESULTS There were 54 studies describing the relation between HCC and NLR and 95 studies describing the relation between HCC and ALBI grade over the last five years. Our local cohort of patients showed NLR to have a significant negative relationship to survival (P = 0.011). There was also significant inverse relationship between the size of the largest HCC nodule and survival (P = 0.009). Median survival with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) < 10 KU/L was 20 mo and with AFP > 10 KU/L was 5 mo. We found that AFP was inversely related to survival, this relationship was not statically significant (P = 0.132). Mean survival for ALBI grade 1 was 37.7 mo, ALBI grade 2 was 13.4 months and ALBI grade 3 was 4.5 mo. ALBI grades performed better than Child Turcotte Pugh score in detecting death from HCC.
CONCLUSION NLR and ALBI grade in HCC predict survival better than the conventional alpha fetoprotein. ALBI grade performs better than Child Turcotte Pugh score. These markers are done as part of routine clinical care and in cases of normal alpha fetoprotein, these markers could give a better understanding of the patient disease progression. NLR and ALBI grade could have a role in modified easier to learn staging and prognostic systems for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Bannaga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry CV2 2DX, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7HL, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Ramesh P Arasaradnam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry CV2 2DX, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7HL, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Analysis of prognostic factors in patients receiving transarterial radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 41:73-77. [PMID: 31800509 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors of patients receiving transarterial radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHOD Eighty-six (73 M and 13F; mean age: 64.3 ± 9.8 years) patients who received transarterial radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included. Relationship between serum alpha-fetoprotein and international normalization ratio level, albumin-bilirubin grade, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, presence of portal venous thrombosis and extrahepatic metastases, the dimension of index lesion and OS were analyzed. RESULTS Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was ≤ 5 in 76 (88%) and >5 in 10 (12%) of patients. Sixty-two (72%) patients died during a mean of 25.6± 9.7 months follow-up. Mean OS for all patients was calculated as 12.9 ± 14.6 months. In univariate analysis, albumin-bilirubin grade (22.3 ± 3.8 vs. 11.6 ± 4.2; P = 0.03), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (21.8 ± 3.6 vs. 7.3 ± 2.6; P =0.04), presence of extrahepatic metastases (30.1 ± 5.4 vs. 7.4 ± 2.0; P = 0.001) and portal venous thrombosis (26.5± 4.8 vs. 10.5 ± 2.1; P = 0.01) had significant effect on OS. In multivariate analysis, serum international normalization ratio (P = 0.005) and alpha-fetoprotein level (P = 0.004), albumin-bilirubin grade (P = 0.05), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.007), Child-Pugh score (0.006) and presence of ascites (P = 0.005) were significantly correlated with OS. CONCLUSION Patients with low basal albumin-bilirubin grade and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio survive longer after transarterial radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Presence of extrahepatic metastases and portal venous thrombosis seems to have a prognostic value.
Collapse
|
12
|
Erinjeri JP, Fine GC, Adema GJ, Ahmed M, Chapiro J, den Brok M, Duran R, Hunt SJ, Johnson DT, Ricke J, Sze DY, Toskich BB, Wood BJ, Woodrum D, Goldberg SN. Immunotherapy and the Interventional Oncologist: Challenges and Opportunities-A Society of Interventional Oncology White Paper. Radiology 2019; 292:25-34. [PMID: 31012818 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Interventional oncology is a subspecialty field of interventional radiology that addresses the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and cancer-related problems by using targeted minimally invasive procedures performed with image guidance. Immuno-oncology is an innovative area of cancer research and practice that seeks to help the patient's own immune system fight cancer. Both interventional oncology and immuno-oncology can potentially play a pivotal role in cancer management plans when used alongside medical, surgical, and radiation oncology in the care of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Erinjeri
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gabriel C Fine
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gosse J Adema
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Muneeb Ahmed
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Julius Chapiro
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Martijn den Brok
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Stephen J Hunt
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - D Thor Johnson
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Beau Bosko Toskich
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Bradford J Wood
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - David Woodrum
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prognosticating Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Elevated Baseline Alpha-fetoprotein Treated with Radioembolization Using a Novel Laboratory Scoring System: Initial Development and Validation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42:700-711. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02191-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
14
|
Hu Z, Chen H, Chen S, Huang Z, Qin S, Zhong J, Qin X, Li S. The value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14749. [PMID: 30817633 PMCID: PMC6831363 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Our study aimed to evaluate the value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).A total of 565 patients with pathological diagnosis of HCC were retrospectively analyzed and 414 patients diagnosed with cirrhosis were treated as a control group. All clinical materials were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.The preintervention NLR, GPR, and α-fetoprotein (AFP) were significantly higher in HCC patients than in the controls (PNLR < .000, PGPR < .000, PAFP < .000). The NLR and GPR were correlated with the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stages, Child-Pugh grades, and tumor size, but not with Edmondson-Steiner grades. Combined use of NLR or GPR with AFP produced larger area under the curve (AUC) (AUCNLR+AFP = 0.916; AUCNLR+AFP = 0.953) than NLR (P < .000), GPR (P < .000), or AFP (P < .000) used alone.The preintervention hematologic parameters (NLR and GPR) studied herein were associated with the BCLC stages of HCC. Combined use of NLR or GPR with AFP may improve early detection and diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuojian Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Huaping Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Siyuan Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Zhili Huang
- Department of Blood Transfusion of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Shanzi Qin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Jianing Zhong
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Xue Qin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| | - Shan Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deipolyi AR, Riedl CC, Bromberg J, Chandarlapaty S, Klebanoff CA, Sofocleous CT, Yarmohammadi H, Brody LA, Boas FE, Ziv E. Association of PI3K Pathway Mutations with Early Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging Response after Radioembolization for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Pilot Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1226-1235. [PMID: 30078647 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe imaging response and survival after radioembolization for metastatic breast cancer and to delineate genetic predictors of imaging responses and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 31 women (average age, 52 y) with liver metastasis from invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent resin and glass radioembolization (average cumulative dose, 2.0 GBq ± 1.8) between January 2011 and September 2017 after receiving ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-four underwent genetic profiling with MSK-IMPACT or Sequenom; 26 had positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging before and after treatment. Survival after the first radioembolization and 2-4-month PET/CT imaging response were assessed. Laboratory and imaging features were assessed to determine variables predictive of outcomes. Unpaired Student t tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare responders and nonresponders categorized by changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the impact of predictors on survival after radioembolization. RESULTS Median survival after radioembolization was 11 months (range, 1-49 mo). Most patients (18 of 26; 69%) had complete or partial response based on changes in fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. Imaging response was associated with longer survival (P = .005). Whereas 100% of patients with PI3K pathway mutations showed an imaging response, only 45% of wild-type patients showed a response (P = .01). Median survival did not differ between PI3K pathway wild-type (10.9 mo) and mutant (undefined) patients (P = .50). CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest that genomic profiling may predict which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit most from radioembolization. PI3K pathway mutations are associated with improved imaging response, which is associated with longer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Deipolyi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
| | - Christopher C Riedl
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline Bromberg
- Department of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sarat Chandarlapaty
- Department of Radiology, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Christopher A Klebanoff
- Center for Cell Engineering and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - F Edward Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Etay Ziv
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., H118-A, New York, NY 10065; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weiner AA, Gui B, Newman NB, Nosher JL, Yousseff F, Lu SE, Foltz GM, Carpizo D, Lowenthal J, Zuckerman DA, Benson B, Olsen JR, Jabbour SK, Parikh PJ. Predictors of Survival after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1094-1100. [PMID: 29754852 PMCID: PMC10905616 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify clinical parameters that are prognostic for improved overall survival (OS) after yttrium-90 radioembolization (RE) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 131 patients who underwent RE for liver metastases from CRC, treated at 2 academic centers, were reviewed. Twenty-one baseline pretreatment clinical factors were analyzed in relation to OS by the Kaplan-Meier method along with log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The median OS from first RE procedure was 10.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-12.7 months). Several pretreatment factors, including lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; ≤20 ng/mL), lower aspartate transaminase (AST; ≤40 IU/L), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <5, and absence of extrahepatic disease at baseline were associated with significantly improved OS after RE, compared with high CEA (>20 ng/mL), high AST (>40 IU/L), NLR ≥5, and extrahepatic metastases (P values of <.001, <.001, .0001, and .04, respectively). On multivariate analysis, higher CEA, higher AST, NLR ≥5, extrahepatic disease, and larger volume of liver metastases remained independently associated with risk of death (hazard ratios of 1.63, 2.06, 2.22, 1.48, and 1.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of patients with metastases from CRC is impacted by a complex set of clinical parameters. This analysis of pretreatment factors identified lower AST, lower CEA, lower NLR, and lower tumor burden (intra- or extrahepatic) to be independently associated with higher survival after hepatic RE. Optimal selection of patients with CRC liver metastases may improve survival rates after administration of yttrium-90.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bin Gui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Neil B Newman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - John L Nosher
- Department of Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Fady Yousseff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, Missouri 63110
| | - Shou-En Lu
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Gretchen M Foltz
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, Missouri 63110
| | - Darren Carpizo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Jonathan Lowenthal
- Department of Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Darryl A Zuckerman
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, Missouri 63110
| | - Ben Benson
- Department of Radiology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, Missouri 63110.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:32171-32189. [PMID: 28418870 PMCID: PMC5458276 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An accurate, time efficient, and inexpensive prognostic indicator is needed to reduce cost and assist with clinical decision making for cancer management. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which is derived from common serum testing, has been explored in a variety of cancers. We sought to determine its prognostic value in gastrointestinal cancers and performed a meta-analysis of published studies using the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Included were randomized control trials and observational studies that analyzed humans with gastrointestinal cancers that included NLR and hazard ratios (HR) with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and/or cancer-specific survival (CSS). We analyzed 144 studies comprising 45,905 patients, two-thirds of which were published after 2014. The mean, median, and mode cutoffs for NLR reporting OS from multivariate models were 3.4, 3.0, 5.0 (±IQR 2.5-5.0), respectively. Overall, NLR greater than the cutoff was associated with a HR for OS of 1.63 (95% CI, 1.53-1.73; P < 0.001). This association was observed in all subgroups based on tumor site, stage, and geographic region. HR for elevated NLR for DFS, PFS, and CSS were 1.70 (95% CI, 1.52-1.91, P < 0.001), 1.64 (95% CI, 1.36-1.97, P < 0.001), and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.50-2.23, P < 0.001), respectively. Available evidence suggests that NLR greater than the cutoff reduces OS, independent of geographic location, gastrointestinal cancer type, or stage of cancer. Furthermore, DFS, PFS, and CSS also have worse outcomes with elevated NLR.
Collapse
|
18
|
Min GT, Li YM, Yao N, Wang J, Wang HP, Chen W. The pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio may predict prognosis of patients with liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 2017; 32. [PMID: 29112283 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, several studies have reported that the pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be associated with the prognosis of liver cancer. Nevertheless, their conclusions remain controversial. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of 54 studies to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR. METHOD Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to July 2017. RESULT A total of 54 studies including 12 979 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Elevated NLR had a close relationship with the overall survival (OS) (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.39-1.67), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.48-2.30), and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.39-2.11) of liver cancer, respectively. In addition, elevated NLR was associated with the presence of tumor vascular invasion (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.93-2.86), multiple tumors (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.15-1.66), alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.15-1.98), presence of HbsAg (+) (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.90), and cirrhosis (OR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.80). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis indicated that elevated NLR may be an effective and noninvasive indicator for prognosis of patients with liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang-Tao Min
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yu-Min Li
- Department of general Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Nan Yao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hong-Peng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rosenblatt RE, Tafesh ZH, Halazun KJ. Role of inflammatory markers as hepatocellular cancer selection tool in the setting of liver transplantation. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:95. [PMID: 29264433 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2017.10.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the advent of the Milan criteria in 1996 and its widespread adoption for selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who would benefit from transplant, there has been an extensive hunt for the ideal clinical biomarker to predict HCC recurrence. This is because Milan lack does not include tumor biology indices and recurrence rates remain in the 15-20% range worldwide. While a 'silver-bullet' biomarker has not been found, several useful inflammatory markers have been identified and used in scoring systems that supersede Milan in their ability to predict HCC recurrence post liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we aim to summarize the role of inflammatory markers paly in the selection of HCC patients awaiting LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell E Rosenblatt
- Division of gastroenterology and hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zaid H Tafesh
- Division of gastroenterology and hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim J Halazun
- Department of surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Diaz-Beveridge R, Bruixola G, Lorente D, Caballero J, Rodrigo E, Segura Á, Akhoundova D, Giménez A, Aparicio J. An internally validated new clinical and inflammation-based prognostic score for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:322-329. [PMID: 28801777 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1720-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sorafenib is a standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), although the clinical benefit is heterogeneous between different pts groups. Among novel prognostic factors, a low baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (bNLR) and early-onset diarrhoea have been linked with a better prognosis. PURPOSE To identify prognostic factors in pts with aHCC treated with 1st-line sorafenib and to develop a new prognostic score to guide management. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of 145 pts bNLR, overall toxicity, early toxicity rates and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS was performed. The prognostic score was calculated from the coefficients found in the Cox analysis. ROC curves and pseudoR2 index were used for internal validation. Discrimination ability and calibration were tested by Harrel's c-index (HCI) and Akaike criteria (AIC). RESULTS The optimal bNLR cut-off for the prediction of OS was 4 (AUC 0.62). Independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for OS were performance status (PS) (p < .0001), Child-Pugh (C-P) score (p = 0.005), early-onset diarrhoea (p = 0.006) and BNLR (0.011). The prognostic score based on these four variables was found efficient (HCI = 0.659; AIC = 1.180). Four risk groups for OS could be identified: a very low-risk (median OS = 48.6 months), a low-risk (median OS = 11.6 months), an intermediate-risk (median OS = 8.3 months) and a high-risk group (median OS = 4.4 months). CONCLUSIONS PS and C-P score were the main prognostic factors for OS, followed by early-onset diarrhoea and bNLR. We identified four risk groups for OS depending on these parameters. This prognostic model could be useful for patient stratification, but an external validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Diaz-Beveridge
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
| | - G Bruixola
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Lorente
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Caballero
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - E Rodrigo
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - Á Segura
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Akhoundova
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Giménez
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Aparicio
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tohme S, Chidi AP, Sud V, Tsung A. Prognostic Nutritional Index Is Associated with Survival in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:470-472. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Revised: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Development of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Mortality in Gouty Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Are They Associated With Mean Platelet Volume and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio? A Comparative Study. Arch Rheumatol 2017; 32:39-45. [PMID: 30375526 DOI: 10.5606/archrheumatol.2017.6033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to evaluate the mean platelet volume (MPV) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in gouty arthritis (GA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, as well as their relationship with atherosclerotic cardiovascular mortality (ACVM). Patients and methods The study included 122 GA patients (96 males, 26 females; mean age 64.6±13.4 years; range 34 to 82 years), 82 RA patients (40 males, 42 females; mean age 62.1±12.1 years; range 29 to 83 years), and 61 healthy controls (34 males, 27 females; mean age 65.3±4.8 years; range 33 to 80 years). Clinical and ACVM data were obtained from medical charts. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, MPV, and NLR were recorded at the time of diagnosis and one month after therapy. Results Mean platelet volume in GA (8.49±1.5) and RA (7.98±0.99) groups were significantly lower than in healthy controls (9.8±15) (p<0.001). NLR in healthy controls (1.9±0.74) was significantly lower than in GA (3.6±2.3) and RA (3.7±2.5) groups (p<0.001). After treatment, MPV did not change significantly in GA and RA groups (p values >0.05); however, NLR decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Nine GA and 12 RA patients died from ACVM during follow-up. GA patients with ACVM were older and had more frequent hypertension, higher MPV, and higher intercritical CRP level. In multivariate analysis, MPV was an independent poor prognostic factor for ACVM in GA patients. Conclusion Gouty arthritis and RA patients had significantly lower MPV and significantly higher NLR than controls. MPV might be used as a potential biomarker for the development of ACVM in GA.
Collapse
|
23
|
Qi X, Li J, Deng H, Li H, Su C, Guo X. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Oncotarget 2016; 7:45283-45301. [PMID: 27304193 PMCID: PMC5216723 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory-based marker. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic role of NLR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RESULTS Overall, 598 papers were identified, of which 90 papers including 20,475 HCC patients were finally included. Low baseline NLR was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.59-2.04, p < 0.00001) and recurrence-free or disease-free survival (HR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.80-2.76, p < 0.00001). Low post- treatment NLR was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.22-2.94, p = 0.004). Decreased NLR was significantly associated with overall survival (HR = 2.23, 95%CI: 1.83-2.72, p < 0.00001) and recurrence-free or disease-free survival (HR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.83-2.72, p < 0.00001). The findings from most of subgroup meta-analyses were consistent with those from the overall meta-analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS All relevant literatures were identified via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the treatment options, NLR cut-off value ranges, and regions. CONCLUSIONS NLR should be a major prognostic factor for HCC patients. NLR might be further incorporated into the prognostic model of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingshun Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, China
| | - Jianjun Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China
| | - Han Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, China
| | - Hongyu Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, China
| | - Chunping Su
- Library of Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032 China
| | - Xiaozhong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang HJ, Guo Z, Yang YT, Jiang JH, Qi YP, Li JJ, Li LQ, Xiang BD. Blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-based analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:5088-5095. [PMID: 27275101 PMCID: PMC4886384 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.5088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate whether an elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can predict poor survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 526 patients with HCC who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2011.
RESULTS: Preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81 was an independent predictor of poor disease-free survival (DFS, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.044). Compared with patients who showed a preoperative NLR < 2.81 and postoperative increase, patients who showed preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81 and postoperative decrease had worse survival (DFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001). Among patients with preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81, survival was significantly higher among those showing a postoperative decrease in NLR than among those showing an increase (DFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001). When elevated, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) provided no prognostic information, and so preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81 may be a good complementary indicator of poor OS whenever AFP levels are low or high.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81 may be an indicator of poor DFS and OS in patients with HCC undergoing surgery. Preoperative NLR ≥ 2.81 may be a good complementary indicator of poor OS when elevated AFP levels provide no prognostic information.
Collapse
|
25
|
D'Emic N, Engelman A, Molitoris J, Hanlon A, Sharma NK, Moeslein FM, Chuong MD. Prognostic significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients treated with selective internal radiation therapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:269-77. [PMID: 27034796 PMCID: PMC4783753 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLR) may represent markers of a suboptimal host immune response to cancer and have been shown to correlate with prognosis in multiple tumor types across different treatment modalities, including radiation therapy. Limited data suggest that NLR may predict for survival and disease control in patients receiving selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). The correlation between clinical outcomes and change in NLR and PLR after SIRT has not been evaluated. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 339 consecutive patients with primary (n=37) or metastatic (n=79) liver cancer treated with SIRT from 2006 to 2014. Complete blood counts with differential were available for 116 patients both before and after (median, 29 and 20 days, respectively) SIRT. Survival and progression were calculated from date of initial SIRT. Patient and tumor characteristics evaluated for ability to predict overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) included pre- and post-treatment neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts (LCs), as well as NLR, PLR, and relative change in NLR and PLR. Cutoff values were determined for variables that were significant on multivariate analysis (MVA) for OS and/or PFS. RESULTS Median follow-up of surviving patients was 12 months. Median OS was 8 months from SIRT and 20 months from date of liver metastasis diagnosis. Significant factors on univariate analysis (UVA) for both lower OS and PFS included higher post-treatment neutrophil count (NC), higher post-treatment NLR, higher liver tumor volume, higher percentage liver tumor burden, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Significant factors on MVA for lower OS and PFS were ECOG performance status ≥2, higher liver tumor volume, higher pretreatment PLR, and increase in PLR after SIRT. Post-treatment increase in PLR >3-fold was the most predictive early marker for increased risk of death when compared with those whose PLR did not increase or increased <3-fold. Pretreatment PLR >78 was the most predictive serum marker associated with improved OS prior to therapy. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study to evaluate the association between NLR and PLR with clinical outcomes in patients receiving SIRT, with results that confirm that pre- and/or post-treatment NLR and/or PLR are predictive of clinical outcomes. The largest increase in risk of death as well as local and extrahepatic disease progression was related to change in PLR, a datum not well reported in the literature. The impact of SIRT on blood count changes and the underlying implications of these ratios should be further characterized in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D'Emic
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexander Engelman
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jason Molitoris
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexandra Hanlon
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Navesh K Sharma
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fred M Moeslein
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael D Chuong
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 2 University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chegai F, Orlacchio A, Merolla S, Monti S, Mannelli L. Intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of transarterial therapy. Hepat Oncol 2015; 2:399-408. [PMID: 26998220 PMCID: PMC4792112 DOI: 10.2217/hep.15.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, the recommended first-line treatment for patients with intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is transarterial chemoembolization. Patients with intermediate stage of HCC represent 20% with a 2-year survival of approximately 50%. Nowadays, transarterial therapies have proved precious in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. During the last years, there were important developments in practiced transarterial therapies and their efficacy is still controversial. The purpose of this review is to discuss in further details these transarterial therapies that have been used to treat cases of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Chegai
- Department of Diagnostic & Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy & Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C276, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Antonio Orlacchio
- Department of Diagnostic & Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy & Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Merolla
- Department of Diagnostic & Molecular Imaging, Radiation Therapy & Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Mannelli
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C276, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|