Transarterial Ethanol Ablation for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of Clinical and Tumor Outcomes

Superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization for recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma: a 6-month outcome analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization (SACE) for the treatment of patients with recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 patients (19 men; median age, 63 years [range, 38-86]) with Child-Pugh class of A/ B/C (16/3/3) that underwent SACE between January and June 2023 for recurrent single HCCs measuring ≤5 cm in diameter using a mixture of 99% ethanol and ethiodized oil/doxorubicin emulsion. The primary endpoint was the 6-month tumor response, and the secondary endpoints were the 1-month tumor response and treatment-related safety. This study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

RESULTS

SACE was successfully performed in 22 patients (95.2%). The complete response rates at 1-month and 6-month after treatment were 100.0% and 83.3%, respectively. At 6-month, local tumor progression occurred in one patient and intrahepatic distant metastasis was found in six patients (30.0%). No 6-month mortalities were reported. No adverse events greater than grade 2 or laboratory deteriorations were observed. Biliary complications or liver abscesses were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SACE for a single rHCC was highly effective in achieving a favorable 6-month tumor response and showed acceptable adverse events. However, further prospective studies are required to verify these findings.

Comparison of Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Transarterial Ethanol Ablation for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) in Tumour Response and Long-Term Survival Outcome

PURPOSE

To compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (TARE), and transarterial ethanol ablation (TEA) for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in treatment responses and long-term survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study approved by institutional committee, inclusion criteria were tumour ≥ 10 cm, newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, Child A, Performance Score 0 or 1, no venous invasion or extrahepatic disease on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. There were 107 patients (Supportive Care [SC] 17, TACE 54, TARE 17, TEA 19). Survival outcomes of SC and TACE were compared (TACE selected as benchmark for transarterial treatments). Tumour response and overall survival (OS) of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

OS of TACE (vs. SC) was significantly longer (9.9 [5.9, 24.1] months versus 2.8 [1.5, 10.2], p = 0.001). Complete response of TEA was significantly better (TEA 10/19 [52.6%] versus TARE 2/17 [12.5%], p = 0.013, versus TACE 9/54 [16.7%], p = 0.002). OS of TEA (vs. TACE) was significantly longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 9.9 [5.9, 24.1], p = 0.014, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1). OS of TEA (vs. TARE) was longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 11.9 [7, 28.7], p = 0.082, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) in favour of TEA).

CONCLUSION

In patients with huge HCC, transarterial treatment as represented by TACE had a survival benefit over supportive care. In this retrospective analysis, TEA was associated with better tumour response and survival outcome as compared to TACE or TARE; therefore, transarterial treatment could be useful for prolonging patient survival, and TEA could be a preferred option.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes in Transarterial Ethanol Ablation and Liver Resection for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ≤ 5 cm in Patients Stratified by Liver Function

PURPOSE

To compare the survival outcomes of patients treated with transarterial ethanol ablation (TEA) with those treated with liver resection (LR) for solitary HCC less than 5 cm in diameter, in patients stratified according to liver function using ALBI grade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study approved by the Institutional Committee included all treatment-naïve patients with solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) and Child-Pugh score 5, and who had received TEA (33 patients) or LR (192 patients) between 2004 and 2012. Treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with TEA and LR after a period of at least 7 years of follow-up. Comparison was repeated for those patients with ALBI grade 2 or 3.

RESULTS

Both overall survival (OS, months) and recurrence-free survival (RFS months) were significantly longer in the LR group (OS: LR 129.7[119.5, 140], TEA 69.1[55.9, 82.3], P < 0.0001; RFS: LR 91.3[43.5, 139.1], TEA 13.8 [11, 16.5], P < 0.0001). In patients with ALBI grade 2 or 3, there was no significant difference between the groups in OS or RFS (OS: LR 43.1[0, 91.2], TEA 55.4 [43.7, 67.2], P = 0.65; RFS: LR 17.8 [11.4, 24.2], TEA 11.9 [6.7, 17.1], P = 0.132). Transient epigastric discomfort and low-grade fever without consequence occurred in 8 patients (8/33 or 24.2%) in the TEA group.

CONCLUSION

The overall survival after LR for HCCs ≤ 5 cm was superior to that after TEA but similar when compared in patients with ALBI grade 2 or 3, the ALBI grade is useful for patient selection for TEA or LR for HCCs ≤ 5 cm.

Management of arterial dissections in 12 patients during transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy for primary and secondary liver tumours

OBJECTIVE

To describe rates and management strategies of arterial dissections in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy (⁹⁰Y SIRT) for primary and secondary liver tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review included 1377 hepatic angiographies between May 2010 and June 2015 in a single centre for TACE and ⁹⁰Y SIRT of liver tumours. The angiogram results, management, treatment outcomes and follow-up angiography/imaging findings were recorded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twelve cases of arterial dissections (12/1377, 0.87%) were documented. Three dissections (3/633, 0.47%) occurred during TACE, seven (7/449, 1.56%) during pre-treatment planning angiographies (PTPA) for ⁹⁰Y SIRT, and two (2/249, 0.80%) during the treatment procedure of ⁹⁰Y SIRT. The preferred management strategy was to manoeuvre past the dissection and complete the procedure, which was achieved in six patients (50%). Angioplasty with stenting was performed in one patient. In three patients, the procedure was held off for up to 3 months to allow the dissection to heal before repeating the procedure. A dissection that occurred during PTPA was detected only when the patient returned for ⁹⁰Y SIRT. PTPA was immediately repeated for this patient. The last patient opted for sorafenib. Residual 50% stenosis was seen in one patient on follow-up hepatic angiography, but he was otherwise asymptomatic. In the remaining patients, no residual dissection or clinical sequelae was observed on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Arterial dissection is a rare but important complication of transarterial locoregional therapy. Where possible, attempts should be made at completing the therapy. Deferring treatment can be considered as dissections usually heal within 3 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, case series.

Individualized Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Tailored Approaches across the Phenotype Spectrum

Ablation is now recommended by international guidelines for the definitive treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Extensive clinical studies have demonstrated outcomes comparable to surgical resection with shorter hospital stays, decreased costs, and improved quality of life. Successful ablation requires complete treatment of both tumor and margin while preserving critical adjacent structures. HCC exhibits highly variable presentations in both anatomic involvement and biology which have significant implications on choice of ablative therapy. There are now abundant ablation modalities and adjunctive techniques which can be used to individualize ablation and maximize curative results. This article provides a patient-centered summary of approaches to HCC ablation in the context of patient performance, hepatic reserve, tumor phenotype and biology, intra- and extrahepatic anatomy, and ablation technology.

Characterization of an Inducible Alcoholic Liver Fibrosis Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Investigation in a Transgenic Porcine Tumorigenic Platform

PURPOSE

This study used the Oncopig Cancer Model (OCM) to develop alcohol-induced fibrosis in a porcine model capable of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Liver injury was induced in 8-week-old Oncopigs (n = 10) via hepatic transarterial infusion of 0.75 mL/kg ethanol-ethiodized oil (1:3 v/v). Feasibility was assessed in an initial Oncopig cohort (n = 5) by histologic analysis at 8 weeks after induction, and METAVIR results were compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 5). Liver injury was then induced in a second OCM cohort (n = 5) for a time-course study, with post-induction disease surveillance via biweekly physical exam, lab analysis, and liver biopsies until 20 weeks after induction.

RESULTS

In Cohort 1, 8-week post-induction liver histologic analysis revealed median METAVIR F3 (range, F3-F4) fibrosis, A2 (range, A2-A3) inflammation, and 15.3% (range, 5.0%-22.9%) fibrosis. METAVIR and inflammation scores were generally elevated compared to healthy controls (F0-F1, P = 0.0013; A0-A1, P = .0013; median percent fibrosis 8.7%, range, 5.8%-12.1%, P = .064). In Cohort 2, histologic analysis revealed peak fibrosis severity of median METAVIR F3 (range, F2-F3). However, lack of persistent alcohol exposure resulted in liver recovery, with median METAVIR F2 (range, F1-F2) fibrosis at 20 weeks after induction. No behavioral or biochemical abnormalities were observed to indicate liver decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study successfully validated a protocol to develop METAVIR F3-F4 fibrosis within 8 weeks in the OCM, supporting its potential to serve as a model for hepatocellular carcinoma in a fibrotic liver background. Further investigation is required to determine if repeated alcohol liver injury is required to develop an irreversible METAVIR grade F4 porcine cirrhosis model.

Ablative Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase I Case-Control Comparison with Conventional Chemoembolization

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and treatment effectiveness of ablative chemoembolization (ACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare with a similar patient cohort who underwent conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Materials and Methods This was a prospective phase I nonrandomized study conducted between March 2013 and October 2016 in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and Declaration Good Clinical Practice with written informed consent. There were 36 men and eight women (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 58-74] and 74.5 years [interquartile range, 70-80], respectively). The primary end points were treatment safety and tumor response. The secondary end points were time to progression, progression-free survival, conversion to partial hepatectomy, and viable HCC within the tumor specimen. The end points of the study group (n = 22) were compared with those of a case-matched control group (n = 22) of patients who underwent conventional cTACE during the same period by using a Pearson χ2 test. Results Treatment with ACE was successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The complete response (CR) rates by patient or by tumor were both 100%. The median time to progression and median progression-free survival were significantly longer in the study group than in the control group (both were 28 months vs 10 months, respectively; P < .001). The number of patient conversions to hepatectomy was seven for ACE and three for cTACE. In the tumor specimens, viable tumor was found in two of eight specimens that underwent ACE and three of three that underwent cTACE. Conclusion ACE is a feasible, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCC; it is highly effective and may be more effective than cTACE in achieving CR. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.