Prospective Evaluation of Passive Expansion of Partially Dilated Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stent Grafts—A Three-Dimensional Sonography Study

6-mm shunt transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with severe liver atrophy and variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVES

We proposed a strategy for the creation of a 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and to assess its effectiveness compared to a conventional 8-mm shunt for TIPS-induced hepatic encephalopathy (HE).

METHODS

Patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1) and divided into 6-mm and 8-mm shunt groups based on shunt diameter. The stent patency, HE incidence, and rebleeding rate between the two groups were then compared.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to June 2021, both 6-mm shunt group and 8-mm shunt group included 58 patients. The 6-mm shunt group had significantly smaller liver volumes (879.3 ± 237.1 vs. 1008.8 ± 293.0; p = 0.010), and the median stent patency times were 30.7 and 33.8 months in the 6-mm and 8-mm groups, respectively (p = 0.124). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the 1-year (8.6% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.242) and 2-year (17.2% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.242) rebleeding rates. The 1-year cumulative incidences of overt HE were 12.1% and 27.6% in the 6-mm and 8-mm groups, respectively (p = 0.040), and the 2-year cumulative overt HE incidences in these groups were 19.0% and 36.2%, respectively (p = 0.038). Notably, patients with a 6-mm shunt also experienced less hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with variceal bleeding and a small liver volume, the 6-mm shunt significantly reduced the incidence of overt HE, protected perioperative liver function, and did not affect stent patency or rebleeding rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

For patients with variceal bleeding with small liver volume, the 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) significantly reduced the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS, protected perioperative liver function, and did not affect stent patency and rebleeding rate.

KEY POINTS

• A strategy for the creation of a 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for patients with variceal bleeding and a small liver volume was proposed. • The 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt significantly reduced the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy. • The 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt did not affect stent patency or rebleeding rate.

Predictive Accuracy Comparison of Prognostic Scoring Systems for Survival in Patients Undergoing TIPS Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of different risk assessment models (RAMs) for survival after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, WOS, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI from inception to February 2023 was conducted. We comprehensively reviewed and aggregated data from numerous studies covering prevalent RAMs such as Child-Turcotte-Pugh, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Sodium (MELD-Na), the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS), Bilirubin-platelet, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score, and Albumin-Bilirubin grade across different timeframes. For this study, short-term is defined as outcomes within a year while long-term refers to outcomes beyond one year. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve or Concordance Statistics was chosen as the metric to assess predictive capacity for mortality outcomes across six predetermined time intervals. Mean effect sizes at various time points were determined using robust variance estimation.

RESULTS

MELD consistently stood out as a primary short-term survival predictor, particularly for 1 month (± 2 weeks) (AUC: 0.72) and 3 months of (± 1 month) survival (AUC: 0.72). MELD-Na showed the best long-term predictive ability, with an AUC of 0.70 at 3.5 years (± 1.5 years). FIPS performed well for 6 months of (± 2 months) survival (AUC: 0.68) and overall transplant-free survival (AUC: 0.75). Efficacy nuances were observed in RAMs when applied to particular subgroups. Meta-regression emphasized the potential predictor overlaps in models like MELD and FIPS.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis underscores the MELD score as the premier predictor for short-term survival following TIPS. Meanwhile, the FIPS score and MELD-Na model exhibit potential in forecasting long-term outcomes. The study accentuates the significance of RAM selection for enhancing patient outcomes and advocates for additional research to corroborate these findings and fine-tune risk assessment in TIPS.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Devices Evolution, Technical Tips and Future Perspectives

Portal hypertension (PH) constitutes a pivotal factor in the progression of cirrhosis, giving rise to severe complications and a diminished survival rate. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has undergone significant evolution, with advancements in stent technology assuming a central role in managing PH-related complications. This review aims to outline the progression of TIPS and emphasizes the significant influence of stent advancement on its effectiveness. Initially, the use of bare metal stents (BMSs) was limited due to frequent dysfunction. However, the advent of expanding polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (ePTFE-SGs) heralded a transformative era, greatly enhancing patency rates. Further innovation culminated in the creation of ePTFE-SGs with controlled expansion, enabling precise adjustment of TIPS diameters. Comparative analyses demonstrated the superiority of ePTFE-SGs over BMSs, resulting in improved patency, fewer complications, and higher survival rates. Additional technical findings highlight the importance of central stent placement and adequate stent length, as well as the use of smaller calibers to reduce the risk of shunt-related complications. However, improving TIPS through technical means alone is inadequate for optimizing patient outcomes. An extensive understanding of hemodynamic, cardiac, and systemic factors is required to predict outcomes and tailor a personalized approach. Looking forward, the ongoing progress in SG technology, paired with the control of clinical factors that can impact outcomes, holds the promise of reshaping the management of PH-related complications in cirrhosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for pediatric portal hypertension: A meta-analysis

To evaluate the feasibility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in children with portal hypertensive complications, PubMed and Cochrane Library were queried to identify clinical studies evaluating TIPS in patients <18 years old. Baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Eleven observational studies totaling 198 subjects were included in the study. The pooled technical success rate and hemodynamic success rate were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86-99%) and 91% (95% CI: 82-97%), respectively; ongoing variceal bleeding resolved in 99.5% (95% CI: 97-100%); refractory ascites was improved in 96% (95% CI: 69-100%); post-TIPS bleeding rate was 14% (95% CI: 1-33%); 88% of patients were alive or successfully received liver transplant (95% CI: 79-96%); and shunt dysfunction rate was 27% (95% CI: 17-38%). Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 10.6% (21/198), though 85.7% (18/21) resolved with medical management only. In conclusion, based on moderate levels of evidence, TIPS is a safe and effective intervention that should be considered in pediatric patients with portal hypertensive complications. Future comparative studies are warranted.

Reduction of portosystemic gradient during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt achieves good outcome and reduces complications

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is placed important role in the therapy of complications of portal hypertension, there is still no suitable criterion for a reduction in portosystemic gradient (PSG), which can both reduce PSG and maximize clinical results and minimize hepatic encephalopathy (HE).

AIM

To compare the clinical outcomes and incidence of HE after one-third PSG reduction during TIPS in patients with variceal bleeding and refractory ascites.

METHODS

A total of 1280 patients with portal-hypertension-related complications of refractory ascites or variceal bleeding who underwent TIPS from January 2016 to January 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into group A (variceal hemorrhage and PSG reduced by one third, n = 479); group B (variceal hemorrhage and PSG reduced to < 12 mmHg, n = 412); group C (refractory ascites and PSG reduced by one third, n = 217); and group D (refractory ascites and PSG reduced to < 12 mmHg of PSG, plus medication, n = 172). The clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

By the endpoint of follow-up, recurrent bleeding was no different between groups A and B (χ² = 7.062, P = 0.374), but recurrent ascites did differ significantly between groups C and D (χ² = 14.493, P = 0.006). The probability of total hepatic impairment within 3 years was significantly different between groups A and B (χ² = 11.352, P = 0.005) and groups C and D (χ² = 13.758, P = 0.002). The total incidence of HE differed significantly between groups A and B (χ² = 7.932, P = 0.016), groups C and D (χ² = 13.637, P = 0.007). There were no differences of survival rate between groups A and B (χ² = 3.376, P = 0.369, log-rank test), but did differ significantly between groups C and D (χ² = 13.582, P = 0.014, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

The PSG reduction by one third may reduce the risk of HE, hepatic function damage and achieve good clinical results.

How Controlled is the Expansion of VIATORR CX?

PURPOSE

To investigate and compare the physical properties of the new generation Gore VIATORR-Controlled Expansion Endoprosthesis (VCX) to those of the predecessor VIATORR stent in an in vitro experimental setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 stents (8 VCX; 4 VIATORR; GORE, USA) were examined. Radial resistive force (RRF) and chronic outward force (COF) were assessed using a radial force testing machine (RX-650, Machine Solutions Inc., USA). To assess the radial forces of the VCX above 8 mm, balloon expansion was performed between cycles.

RESULTS

All VCX stents show an abrupt decrease in COF at an external diameter of 8.3 mm; RRF decreases likewise at an external diameter of 8.5 mm. The predecessor VIATORR stent without the "controlled expansion" feature shows linear radial force reduction until full expansion at a diameter of 10 mm. The physical properties of the VCX can be altered by balloon modulation. Point of COF (RRF) reduction shifts to 8.5 mm (8.6 mm), 8.6 mm (8.8 mm) and 9.3 mm (9.6 mm) following modulation with a 8 mm, 9 mm and 10 mm balloon.

CONCLUSIONS

The VCX shows an abrupt and disproportionate decrease in COF and RRF at an external diameter of 8.3 mm, thus passive expansion to its nominal diameter of 10 mm is not to be expected. By means of balloon dilatation the physical properties of the stent can be altered, enabling customized TIPS creation. The previous VIATORR stent shows continuous COF and RRF until total expansion.

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: Recent evolution and open questions

In selected patients with cirrhosis and ascites, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement improves control of ascites and may reduce mortality. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the use of TIPS for the treatment of ascites in patients with cirrhosis, from pathophysiology of ascites formation to hemodynamic consequences, patient selection, and technical issues of TIPS insertion. The combination of these factors is important to guide clinical decision-making and identify the best strategy for each individual patient. There is still a need to identify the best timing for TIPS placement in the natural history of ascites (recurrent vs. refractory) as well as which type and level of renal dysfunction is acceptable when TIPS is proposed for the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to define the optimal stent diameter according to patient characteristics and individual risk of shunt-related side effects, particularly hepatic encephalopathy and insufficient cardiac response to hemodynamic consequences of TIPS insertion.

Smaller Diameter and Adjustable Diameter Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts

Complications of overshunting, including hepatic encephalopathy and hepatic insufficiency, remain prevalent following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. Smaller diameter TIPS may reduce the risk of overshunting, but the use of smaller stents must be weighed against the risk of undershunting and persistent or recurrent hemorrhage, ascites, and other complications of portal hypertension. This article explores the question of optimal shunt diameter by examining outcomes for smaller diameter TIPS stent-grafts (<10 mm), underdilated stent-grafts, and variable diameter stent-grafts.

North American Practice-Based Recommendations for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Portal Hypertension

Complications of portal hypertension, including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatic encephalopathy, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite few high-quality randomized controlled trials to guide therapeutic decisions, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation has emerged as a crucial therapeutic option to treat complications of portal hypertension. In North America, the decision to perform TIPS involves gastroenterologists, hepatologists, and interventional radiologists, but TIPS creation is performed by interventional radiologists. This is in contrast to other parts of the world where TIPS creation is performed primarily by hepatologists. Thus, the successful use of TIPS in North America is dependent on a multidisciplinary approach and technical expertise, so as to optimize outcomes. Recently, new procedural techniques, TIPS stent technology, and indications for TIPS have emerged. As a result, practices and outcomes vary greatly across institutions and significant knowledge gaps exist. In this consensus statement, the Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches group critically reviews the application of TIPS in the management of portal hypertension. Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches convened a multidisciplinary group of North American experts from hepatology, interventional radiology, transplant surgery, nephrology, cardiology, pulmonology, and hematology to critically review existing literature and develop practice-based recommendations for the use of TIPS in patients with any cause of portal hypertension in terms of candidate selection, procedural best practices and, post-TIPS management; and to develop areas of consensus for TIPS indications and the prevention of complications. Finally, future research directions are identified related to TIPS for the management of portal hypertension.

Review article: post-TIPSS hepatic encephalopathy-current knowledge and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

In light of the global rise in the burden of chronic liver diseases and liver cirrhosis, the number of patients suffering from decompensation events is expected to increase. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSS) provide effective long-term symptom control and may prolong transplant-free survival in portal hypertension-driven recurrent ascites and variceal bleeding. New-onset or recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPSS insertion (post-TIPSS HE) represents the most severe post-interventional complication.

AIMS

To provide insight into the epidemiology and risk factors for post-TIPSS HE and scrutinize the current state of the art in treatment and drug therapy options.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on post-TIPSS HE in patients with liver cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Post-TIPSS HE occurs in up to 54.5% of cases and particularly early recurrent HE is associated with a dismal prognosis. In recent years, several risk factors for the development of post-TIPSS HE have been identified. These include not only parameters reflecting liver function (model for end-stage liver disease score/Child-Pugh score) as well as cognitive dysfunction caused by minimal HE but also extrahepatic factors such as sarcopenia and common medications such as proton pump inhibitors. In addition, new data on the benefit of rifaximin and of smaller stent grafts emerged and may improve the prevention of post-TIPSS HE.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful selection of TIPSS candidates is of utmost importance to reduce the risk of post-TIPSS HE. In this narrative review, we provide a concise overview of the current epidemiology and risk factors of the treatment options for post-TIPSS HE.

Cranial stent position is independently associated with the development of TIPS dysfunction

Complications of portal hypertension can be treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in selected patients. TIPS dysfunction is a relevant clinical problem. This study investigated the prognostic value of two-dimensional (2D) TIPS geometry for the development of TIPS dysfunction. Three hundred and seven patients undergoing TIPS procedure between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed in this monocentric retrospective study. 2D angiograms from the patients with and without TIPS dysfunction were reviewed to determine geometric characteristics including insertion and curve angles and the location of the stent. Primary outcome was the development of TIPS dysfunction. A total of 70 patients developed TIPS dysfunction and were compared to the dysfunction-free (n = 237) patients. The position of the cranial stent end in the hepatic vein and the persistence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts were significantly associated with the development of TIPS dysfunction. Among significant parameters in univariable regression analysis (portal vein-pressure after TIPS, Child-Pugh Score before TIPS, MELD before TIPS and white blood cell count before TIPS), multivariable models showed cranial stent position (p = 0.027, HR 2.300, 95% CI 1.101-4.806) and SPSS embolization (p = 0.006, HR 0.319, 95% CI 0.140-0.725) as the only predictors of TIPS dysfunction. This monocentric study demonstrates that the position of the cranial stent end is independently associated with the development of TIPS dysfunction. The distance of the cranial stent end to the IVC at the time of TIPS placement should be less than 1 cm in 2D angiography.

High Incidence of Hepatic Encephalopathy After Viatorr Controlled Expansion Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

BACKGROUND

The Viatorr Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent-graft was designed to mitigate hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

AIMS

To determine the incidence and degree of HE after VCX TIPS.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients (M:F 17:16, mean age 58 years, mean MELD score 12) who underwent VCX TIPS between 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. 11/33 (33%) patients had medically controlled pre-TIPS HE. TIPS indications included variceal hemorrhage (n = 12, 30%) and ascites (n = 21, 70%). Measured outcomes were post-TIPS HE (overall, recurrent, de novo) graded using the West Haven system, time-to-HE occurrence, HE-related hospitalization rate, and TIPS reduction rate.

RESULTS

VCX TIPS were 8 mm in 28/33 (85%) and 10 mm in 5/33 (15%). Mean final portosystemic pressure gradient was 6 mmHg. Cumulative HE incidence post-TIPS was 61% (20/33). 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month HE rates were 24%, 30%, 53%, and 61% over 247-day median follow-up. Median time-to-HE was 180 days. HE grades spanned grade 1 (n = 6), grade 2 (n = 8), and grade 3 (n = 6); 9 and 11 cases were recurrent and de novo HE, respectively. Medication non-compliance/infection was implicated in HE in 9/20 (45%) cases. Medical therapy addressed HE in 18/20 (90%) cases; however, HE still resulted in 39 hospitalizations among 13 patients, and median time to first hospitalization was 75 days. Shunt reduction was necessary in 2 (10%) cases of medically refractory HE.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of HE after VCX TIPS is high. Though HE symptoms may be medically controlled, hospitalization rates are high, and shunt reduction may be necessary.

History of Hepatic Encephalopathy Is Not a Contraindication to Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement for Refractory Ascites

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are controversial. We studied the relationship of pre-TIPS HE in patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites on all-cause mortality and development of post-TIPS HE.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective comparison study was performed for patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites. Survival by history of pre-TIPS HE was demonstrated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of post-TIPS clinical outcomes for patients with and without pre-TIPS HE.

RESULTS

We identified 202 TIPS recipients (61% male, mean ± SD; age 59.1 ± 10.2 years; mean model for end-stage liver disease score 17.3 ± 6.9). Pre-TIPS HE did not predispose patients for increased all-cause mortality, increased risk of experiencing HE within 60 days, or increased risk of hospital admission for HE within 6 months. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that total bilirubin (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; P = 0.016) and blood urea nitrogen (OR 1.15; P = 0.002) were predictors for all-cause mortality within 6 months post-TIPS. Age ≥65 years (OR 3.92; P = 0.004), creatinine (OR 2.22; P = 0.014), and Child-Pugh score (OR 1.53; P = 0.006) were predictors for HE within 60 days post-TIPS. Predictors of intensive care admission for HE within 6 months post-TIPS included age ≥65 years (OR 8.84; P = 0.018), history of any admission for HE within 6 months pre-TIPS (OR 8.42; P = 0.017), and creatinine (OR 2.22; P = 0.015).

DISCUSSION

If controlled, pre-TIPS HE does not adversely impact patient survival or clinical outcomes, such as development of HE within 60 days of TIPS or hospital admission for HE within 6 months. Patients may be able to undergo TIPS for refractory ascites despite a history of HE.

Potential Benefits of Underdilation of 8-mm Covered Stent in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. This study was aimed to determine whether underdilated TIPS with 8-mm polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents could reduce the risk of HE and liver damage yet maintain clinical and hemodynamic efficacy.

METHODS

This retrospective case-controlled study included 134 patients treated with TIPS from March 2017 to November 2019. All the TIPS procedures were created using 8-mm covered stents, and according to the diameter of expansion balloon catheters, the patients were divided into 2 groups, an underdilated group (6-mm balloon catheter, n = 73) and a control group (8-mm balloon catheter, n = 61).

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the cumulative incidence of overt HE in the underdilated group was significantly lower than that in the control group (11.0% vs 29.5%, log rank P = 0.007), but no statistical differences were found toward variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, and survival between groups. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for overt HE were identified as age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.003-1.069, P = 0.032), Child-Pugh score (HR = 1.519, 95% CI = 1.212-1.905, P < 0.001), and group assignment (HR = 0.291, 95% CI = 0.125-0.674, P = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

Underdilated TIPS with 8-mm polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents could reduce the risk of HE and liver function impairment compared with completely dilated TIPS, but not increase the risk of variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, and death.

Refining prediction of survival after TIPS with the novel Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation is an effective and safe treatment for complications of portal hypertension. Survival prediction is important in these patients as they constitute a high-risk population. Therefore, the aim of our study was to develop an alternative prognostic model for accurate survival prediction after planned TIPS implantation.

METHODS

A total of 1,871 patients with de novo TIPS implantation for ascites or secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding were recruited retrospectively. The study cohort was divided into a training set (80% of study patients; n = 1,496) and a validation set (20% of study patients; n = 375). Further, patients with early (preemptive) TIPS implantation due to variceal bleeding were included as another validation cohort (n = 290). Medical data and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A Cox regression model was used to create an alternative prediction model, which includes significant prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Age, bilirubin, albumin and creatinine were the most important prognostic factors. These parameters were included in a new score named the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS). The FIPS score was able to identify high-risk patients with a significantly reduced median survival of 5.0 (3.1-6.9) months after TIPS implantation in the training set. These results were confirmed in the validation set (median survival of 3.1 [0.9-5.3] months). The FIPS score showed better prognostic discrimination compared to the Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na score and the bilirubin-platelet model. However, the FIPS score showed insufficient prognostic discrimination in patients with early TIPS implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIPS score is superior to established scoring systems for the identification of high-risk patients with a worse prognosis following elective TIPS implantation.

LAY SUMMARY

Implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension. However, risk stratification is a major challenge in these patients as currently available scoring systems have major drawbacks. Age, bilirubin, albumin and creatinine were included in a new risk score which was named the Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS). The FIPS score can identify patients at high risk and may guide clinical decision making.

Management of Severe and Refractory Ascites

Considering the poor prognosis, severe and refractory ascites is a milestone in cirrhotic patients. Liver transplantation must be considered first. In the case of contraindication to liver transplantation or when the waiting period is estimated to be more than 6 months, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt should be discussed in eligible patients. Regardless of the type of treatment, a careful selection of patients is crucial to avoid further decompensation and specific complications of each treatment.

Controlled underdilation using novel VIATORR® controlled expansion stents improves survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantation

Background & Aims

Smaller 8-mm diameter transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) appear to be more beneficial than larger 10-mm TIPS stent-grafts, but lack the ability for secondary dilation in cases of clinical ineffectiveness. Underdilated VIATORR® TIPS stent grafts (VTS) expand passively, whereas novel VIATORR Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent grafts do not. This study evaluated the impact on survival of underdilated VCX compared with VTS in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Methods

This was a prospective case-control study including patients with cirrhosis receiving TIPS using 10-mm VCX underdilated to 8 mm. Patients with cirrhosis receiving 10-mm VTS underdilated to 8 mm were matched for age, sex, indication for TIPS, and liver function.

Results

A total of 114 patients (47 VCX, 47 VTS, and 20 fully dilated VCX/VTS) were included. After TIPS implantation, underdilated VCX diameter was 8.0 (7.8-9.2) mm at a median time of 359 (87-450) days, compared with VTS at 9.9 (9.7-10.0) mm (p <0.001). The portosystemic pressure gradient immediately after TIPS procedure and after 7 days did not change significantly in VCX [mean 9.4 (± 0.8) vs. 10.4 (± 0.7) mmHg, p = 0.115). Hospital readmission rates for hepatic encephalopathy were 23% (n = 11) vs 51% (n = 24) for VCX and VTS (p <0.001), respectively. Patients with VCX had significantly lower rates of large-volume paracentesis (n = 5 [11%] vs. n = 10 [21%], p = 0.017) and heart failure (n = 1 [2%] vs. n = 7 [15%], p = 0.015). One-year mortality for underdilated VCX and VTS was 15% (n = 7) and 30% (n = 14) and, for fully dilated VCX/VTS, was 45% (n = 9) (log-rank p = 0.008), respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that VCX stent grafts underdilated to 8 mm do not passively expand to nominal diameter and suggests reduced hospital readmissions because of hepatic encephalopathy, uncontrolled ascites, and heart failure, and improved 1-year survival compared with underdilated VTS.

Lay summary

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves survival in selected patients with liver cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. Smaller 8-mm diameter TIPS stent grafts appear to improve patient outcome compared with larger 10-mm diameter stent grafts. Novel VIATORR® Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent grafts facilitate safe and stable underdilation to 8 mm of large 10-mm diameter stent grafts with improved patient outcome (survival, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites and heart failure) compared with legacy VIATORR TIPS stent graft (VTS). Thus, the use of underdilated VCX could preserve heart function.

Clinical Trials Registration

The study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT03628807.

Small diameter shunts should lead to safe expansion of the use of TIPS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is increasingly used worldwide to treat the complications of portal hypertension in patients with advanced cirrhosis. However, its use is hampered by the risk of causing hepatic encephalopathy and of worsening liver function. The reported haemodynamic targets used to guide TIPS are too narrow to be achieved in most cases and are perhaps not entirely adequate nowadays as they were obtained in the pre-covered stent era. We propose that small diameter TIPS - alone or combined to pharmacological therapy or ancillary interventional radiology procedures - may overcome these limitations while maintaining the beneficial effects of the procedure.

Shunt-Induced Hepatic Encephalopathy in TIPS: Current Approaches and Clinical Challenges

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment tool in decompensated liver cirrhosis that has been shown to prolong transplant-free survival. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of decompensated cirrhosis, eventually induced and/or aggravated by TIPS, that remains a clinical challenge especially in these patients. Therefore, patient selection for TIPS requires careful assessment of risk factors for HE. TIPS procedural parameters regarding stent size and invasive portosystemic pressure gradient measurements thereby have an important role. Endovascular shunt modification, in combination with a conservative medical approach, often results in a significant reduction of symptoms. This review summarizes HE molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeting shunt-induced HE.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for patients with liver cirrhosis: survey evaluating indications, standardization of procedures and anticoagulation in 43 German hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion is an established treatment to lower portal pressure. There are no obligatory evidence-based recommendations addressing procedure and anticoagulation. Therefore, a survey was performed to establish current practice at different German hospitals.

METHODS

A three-page survey was sent out via postal mail to 76 different hospitals addressing the topics indication, contraindication, follow-up and anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Forty-three hospitals completed the survey: the median number of TIPS/year was 28.6 ± 23. Ascites and hydrothorax were announced as the main indications. Bilirubin levels above 5 mg/dl, hepatic encephalopathy and cardiac disease were considered as absolute contraindications in most hospitals, but age was not. The biggest variations were reported with regard to anticoagulation after TIPS procedure. Four hospitals never used any anticoagulation; most hospitals reported the use of low molecular weight heparins for a period of days up to 4 weeks. But also aspirin or clopidogrel was used after TIPS insertion in eight different hospitals. Additionally, the standards for follow-up after TIPS insertion were different in the hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus how to handle indication, contraindications and anticoagulation after the TIPS procedure. A national and international consensus is warranted to improve the outcome of TIPS patients and reduce secondary complications. In addition to compare results and efficacy in the future standard operation procedures as proposed here need to be put in place.

Where does TIPS fit in the management of patients with cirrhosis?

In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on the indications and contraindications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for the treatment of the complications of portal hypertension in cirrhosis, specifically variceal haemorrhage and ascites. Moreover, we discuss the role of TIPS for the treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the prevention of complications after extrahepatic surgery ('preoperative TIPS') in patients with cirrhosis. The position of TIPS in the treatment hierarchy depends on the clinical setting and on patient characteristics. In acute variceal haemorrhage, preemptive TIPS is indicated in patients at a high risk of failing standard therapy, that is those with a Child-Pugh score of 10-13 points or Child-Pugh B with active bleeding at endoscopy, although the survival benefit in the latter group still remains to be established. Non-preemptive TIPS is a second-line therapy for the prevention of recurrent variceal haemorrhage and for the treatment of ascites. Of note, TIPS may also improve sarcopenia. Contraindications to TIPS placement, independent of clinical setting, include very advanced disease (Child-Pugh >13 points), episodes of recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy without an identifiable precipitating factor, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension. In patients with PVT, TIPS placement not only controls complications of portal hypertension, but also promotes portal vein recanalisation. Although the severity of portal hypertension correlates with poor outcomes after extrahepatic surgery, there is no evidence to recommend preoperative TIPS placement.

Predictors of Occurrence and Risk of Hepatic Encephalopathy After TIPS Creation: A 15-Year Experience

PURPOSE

To identify clinical variables, including use of newer Viatorr TIPS endoprosthesis with controlled expansion (VCX) that may affect the occurrence and risk of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

METHODS

A total of 376 patients who underwent TIPS creation at our institution between 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Of these patients, 71 received a Viatorr controlled expansion endoprosthesis and 305 received a Viatorr TIPS endoprosthesis (older version without controlled expansion). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors predicting the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS creation; a Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess risk of HE through time to HE onset RESULTS: A total of 194 patients (52%) developed hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS creation, including 28 of 71 patients (39%) who received a VCX endoprosthesis. Older patient age and the use of Viatorr endoprosthesis without controlled expansion were significantly associated with the development of hepatic encephalopathy overall. Pre-TIPS pressure variables, patient age, plasma international normalized ratio, and model for end-stage liver disease score were risk factors for time to hepatic encephalopathy.

CONCLUSION

Several variables are mild predictors of early hepatic encephalopathy development after TIPS creation, and the use of VCX endoprosthesis in TIPS creation is associated with a modest lower risk of hepatic encephalopathy. These preliminary findings should be considered in regard to patient selection, endoprosthesis selection, and post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation monitoring for the development of hepatic encephalopathy.

Smaller-Diameter Covered Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stents Are Associated With Increased Survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We studied the effects of diameter of covered, self-expandable, nitinol stents on survival times of patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHODS

We collected data from 185 patients (median age, 55 y; 30% female) who received a covered nitinol stent, from February 2006 through September 2010, using the online multicenter German TIPS registry. TIPS were given to 107 patients for refractory ascites and to 78 patients for variceal bleeding. Patients at risk of hepatic encephalopathy (owing to advanced age, prior episodes) or liver failure (bilirubin level, >3 mg/dL), and bleeding patients receiving variceal embolization at TIPS, received 8-mm stents (n = 53). The remaining patients received 10-mm stents (n = 132). Eighty-one of the 10-mm stents were underdilated using 8-mm dilation balloons. Clinical and biochemical data were collected after TIPS placement at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and thereafter every 3 to 6 months. Groups were compared using propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who received 8-mm stents survived significantly longer (34 ± 26 mo) than patients who received 10-mm stents (18 ± 19 mo), regardless of whether they were fully dilated or underdilated. When we compared 10-mm stents with or without underdilation, we found that a significantly higher proportion of patients who received underdilated stents survived for 1 month after TIPS placement (95% vs 84%; P = .03), but not for 3 months (P = .10). In multivariate analysis, 1-year mortality correlated with full dilation of the stent to 10 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5) and with serum creatinine concentration at baseline (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7). Five-year mortality was associated with use of the 10-mm stents (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7) and baseline concentration of creatinine (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

A smaller stent (nominal diameter of 8 mm, but not underdilation of a 10-mm stent) is associated with a prolonged survival compared with 10-mm stents, independent of liver-specific prognostic criteria.

Pediatric Hepatobiliary Interventions in the Setting of Intrahepatic Vascular Malformations, Portal Hypertension, and Liver Transplant

Within the broad spectrum of pediatric hepatobiliary disorders, hepatic vascular malformations, portal hypertension, and hepatic transplant interventions pose numerous challenges. The role of interventional radiology within each of these conditions is discussed herein, beginning with endovascular management of high flow hepatic vascular malformations. Next, while becoming less common in adult populations, surgical portoportal and portosystemic shunts remain prevalent in many pediatric centers. Shunt anatomy is reviewed along with endovascular management techniques for shunt dysfunction. Next, the growing experience with pediatric transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement is reviewed along with tips for success in pediatric patients. Finally, pediatric hepatic transplant interventions are discussed with technical notes pertinent to split liver anatomy.

Ascites control by TIPS is more successful in patients with a lower paracentesis frequency and is associated with improved survival

Background & Aims

Refractory ascites is the main reason for the implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in liver cirrhosis, but ascites control by TIPS fails in a relevant proportion of cases. Here, we investigated whether routine parameters pre-TIPS can predict persistent ascites after TIPS implantation and whether persistent ascites predicts long-term clinical outcome.

Methods

A detailed retrospective analysis of 128 patients receiving expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents for the treatment of refractory ascites was performed. Persistent ascites post-TIPS was defined as the prolonged need for paracentesis >3 months after TIPS. The influence of demographics, laboratory results, pre-TIPS heart and liver ultrasound results, and invasive hemodynamic parameters on persistent ascites was evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Predictors of the composite endpoint liver transplantation/death were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression.

Results

Ascites control post-TIPS was achieved in 95/128 patients (74%), whereas ascites remained persistent in 33/128 cases (26%). On multivariable analysis, a lower paracentesis frequency pre-TIPS (odds ratio 1.672; 95% CI 1.253–2.355) and lower baseline creatinine levels (odds ratio 2.640; CI 1.201–6.607) were associated with ascites control. Patients with persistent ascites post-TIPS had and impaired transplant-free survival (median 10.0 vs. 25.8 months), for which persistent ascites was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio 5.654; CI 3.019–10.59).

Conclusion

TIPS-placement in patients with lower paracentesis frequency and creatinine levels is associated with superior ascites control. Thus, TIPS implantation should be considered in moderate decompensation and not as a last resort. Persistent ascites post-TIPS seems to be the only predictor of liver transplantation and death.

Lay summary

The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with refractory ascites should be considered in patients with moderate decompensation and not as a last resort, as lower paracentesis frequency and creatinine levels pre-TIPS are associated with superior ascites control. In turn, failure to control ascites seems to be the only predictor of liver transplantation and death.

•

Ascites control post-TIPS is superior if the TIPS is placed at lower paracentesis frequency and creatinine levels.

•

Transplant-free survival is decreased in patients with a failed ascites control post-TIPS.

•

TIPS-placement should be considered “early” in ascitic decompensation.

•

Close monitoring and prioritized organ allocation should be considered in patients with failed ascites control post-TIPS.

Unsolved Questions in Salvage TIPSS: Practical Modalities for Placement, Alternative Therapeutics, and Long-Term Outcomes

Salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) has proven its efficacy to treat refractory variceal bleeding for patients with cirrhosis. However, this procedure is associated with very poor outcomes. As it is used as a last resort to treat a severe complication of cirrhosis, it seems essential to improve our practice, with the aim of optimizing management of those patients. Somehow, many questions are still unsolved: which stents should be used? Should a concomitant embolization be systematically considered? Is there any alternative therapeutic in case of recurrent bleeding despite TIPSS? What are the long-term outcomes on survival, liver transplantation, and hepatic encephalopathy after salvage TIPSS? Is this procedure futile in some patients? Is prognosis with salvage TIPSS nowadays as bad as earlier, despite the improvement of prophylaxis for variceal bleeding? The aim of this review is to summarize those data and to identify the lacking ones to guide further research on salvage TIPSS.

Technical Feasibility and Clinical Effectiveness of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

PURPOSE

To examine the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in children and adolescents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of 59 patients (mean age 12.6 y [range, 1.5-20 y], mean weight 47.5 kg [range, 11.4-112.2 kg], mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score 12.5 [range, 6-33]) who underwent 61 TIPS attempts at 3 tertiary children's hospitals from 2001 to 2017 for acute esophageal or gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding, and refractory ascites. Pediatric liver disease etiologies included biliary atresia, cystic fibrosis, and ductal plate anomalies. Technical, hemodynamic, and clinical success and patency rates were reported at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. Statistical analysis evaluated reasons for clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis measured clinical success, patency, and transplant-free survival.

RESULTS

Technical success was 93.4% (57/61) in 59 consecutive patients. Most common TIPS indications were treating and preventing esophageal and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (57/59; 96.6%). Hemodynamic success was 94% (47/50). Clinical success was 80.7% (45/56). Two-year clinical success for acute variceal bleeding and ascites was 94.1% and 100%, respectively. Overall patency at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months was 98.0%, 97.8%, 94.3%, and 91.3%. Two-year transplant-free survival was 88.8%. Overall and major complication rates were 21.2% (13/61) and 8.2% (5/61), with 3 mortalities. Gradient reduction < 12 mm Hg correlated with clinical success (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS creation in pediatric patients is technically feasible and clinically efficacious for treatment and prevention of esophageal and gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. High 2-year clinical success, patency, and survival rates should encourage providers to consider portosystemic shunts as a bridge to liver transplantation.

Variable efficacy of TIPSS in the management of ectopic variceal bleeding: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the efficacy of TIPSS in ectopic variceal bleeding (EctVB) is largely based on relatively small series.

AIM

To define the efficacy of TIPSS in EctVB.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with chronic liver disease who presented with EctVB and received TIPSS in three tertiary centres in 1992-2016.

RESULTS

The study included 53 patients (70% male, median age 61 years, median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score 11). The ectopic varices were located around the insertion of stomas (40%), duodenum (23%), rectum (17%) and at other sites (20%). Three-quarters of the patients had previously received unsuccessful medical, endoscopic or surgical therapy. The median follow-up was 14.0 months. Following TIPSS, bleeding recurred in 12 patients: 6 of 12 (50%) with duodenal varices, 2 of 9 (22%) with rectal varices and one each with stomal (1/21), intraperitoneal (1/3), hepaticojejunostomy (1/2) and ascending colon varices (1/2). The risk factors for re-bleeding were MELD score at TIPSS placement (HR: 1.081 per point; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.012-1.153; P = 0.034), varices located at site other than an enterostomy (HR: 9.770; 95%CI: 1.241-76.917; P = 0.030) and previous local therapy (HR: 5.710; 95%CI: 1.211-26.922; P = 0.028). The estimated cumulative re-bleeding rate was 23% at 1 year, 26% at 3 years and 32% at 5 years. Post-TIPSS hepatic encephalopathy manifested or worsened in 16 of 53 patients (30%).

CONCLUSION

TIPSS provides long-term control of bleeding in most cirrhotic patients with EctVB. TIPSS is particularly effective in stomal EctVB, the most frequent cause of EctVB, but might not be as effective in duodenal EctVB.

Under-dilated TIPS Associate With Efficacy and Reduced Encephalopathy in a Prospective, Non-randomized Study of Patients With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) is a major complication of trans-jugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Most devices are self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (PTFE-SGs) that are dilated to their nominal diameter (8 or 10 mm). We investigated whether PTFE-SGs dilated to a smaller caliber (under-dilated TIPS) reduce PSE yet maintain clinical and hemodynamic efficacy. We also studied whether under-dilated TIPS self-expand to nominal diameter over time.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, non-randomized study of 42 unselected patients with cirrhosis who received under-dilated TIPS (7 and 6 mm) and 53 patients who received PTFE-SGs of 8 mm or more (controls) at referral centers in Italy. After completion of this study, dilation to 6 mm became the standard and 47 patients were included in a validation study. All patients were followed for 6 months; Doppler ultrasonography was performed 2 weeks and 3 months after TIPS placement and every 6 months thereafter. Stability of PTFE-SG diameter was evaluated by computed tomography analysis of 226 patients with cirrhosis whose stent grafts increased to 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 mm. The primary outcomes were incidence of at least 1 episode of PSE grade 2 or higher during follow up, incidence of recurrent variceal hemorrhage or ascites, incidence of shunt dysfunction requiring TIPS recanalization, and reduction in porto-caval pressure gradient.

RESULTS

PSE developed in a significantly lower proportion of patients with under-dilated TIPS (27%) than controls (54%) during the first year after the procedure (P = .015), but the proportions of patients with recurrent variceal hemorrhage or ascites did not differ significantly between groups. No TIPS occlusions were observed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. In an analysis of self-expansion of stent grafts, during a mean follow-up period of 252 days after placement, none of the PTFE-SGs self-expanded to the nominal diameter in hemodynamically relevant sites (such as portal and hepatic vein vascular walls).

CONCLUSIONS

In prospective, non-randomized study of patients with cirrhosis, we found under-dilation of PTFE-SGs during TIPS placement to be feasible, associated with lower rates of PSE, and effective.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients with Portal Hypertension: Patency Depends on Coverage and Interventionalist's Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the treatment of choice in decompensated portal hypertension. TIPS revision due to thrombosis or stenosis increases morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to investigate patient- and procedure-associated risk factors for TIPS-revision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 189 patients who underwent the TIPS procedure. Only patients who required TIPS revision within 1 year (Group I, 34 patients) and patients who did not require re-intervention within the first year (Group II [control group], 54 patients) were included.

RESULTS

Out of 88 patients, the majority were male (69.3%) and mean age was 56 ± 11 years. Indications for TIPS were refractory ascites (68%), bleeding (24%), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (8%). The most frequent liver disease was alcohol-induced cirrhosis (60%). Forty-three patients (49%) received bare and 45 patients (51%) covered stents, thus resulting in reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) from 19.0 to 9.0 mm Hg. When comparing patient- and procedure-related factors, the type of stent (p < 0.01) and interventionalist's experience (number of performed TIPS implantations per year; p < 0.05) were the only factors affecting the risk of re-intervention due to stent dysfunction, while age, gender, indication, Child-Pugh, and model of end-stage liver disease score, platelet count, pre- and post-HVPG, additional variceal embolization, stent diameter, and number of stents did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing TIPS procedure should be surveilled closely for shunt dysfunction while covered stents and high-level experience are associated with increased -patency.

Incrementally Expandable Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: Single-Center Experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:438-446. [PMID: 29261352 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18222]

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of a small-diameter expandable transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 28 patients (12 women and 16 men; mean age, 56.9 years) who underwent small-diameter expandable TIPS creation between 2008 and 2010 for refractory ascites (n = 15; mean [± SD] model for end-stage liver disease [MELD] score, 15.5 ± 5.3) or gastrointestinal variceal bleeding (n = 13; mean MELD score, 15.2 ± 8.4). An expandable TIPS was created by deploying a covered stent inside a balloon expandable stent. For patients with recurrent symptoms, TIPS adjustment was made by balloon expandable stent balloon dilation. The TIPS diameter was defined as the diameter of the final angioplasty balloon. TIPS patency and efficacy and the rate of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median diameter of the initial TIPS was 8 mm in the group with variceal bleeding compared with 6 mm in the group with ascites (p = 0.003). The primary patency rate at 1 and 5 years was 90.8% and 73.3%, respectively. Eighty percent of patients with ascites required no or less-frequent large-volume paracentesis. The clinical success rate for patients with acute variceal bleeding was 92.3%. Six patients with ascites (initial TIPS diameter, 6 mm) and two patients with variceal bleeding (initial diameter, 6 mm and 8 mm) required subsequent TIPS adjustment. Of the 22 patients with no prior history of enecphalophy, seven patients (31.8%) experienced new hepatic encephalopathy within 90 days.

CONCLUSION

A small-diameter expandable TIPS is technically feasible and safe, with efficacy falling within the range of that of conventional TIPS. This technique offers the possibility of individualizing the degree of portal decompression.