A Comparison of Concomitant Tributary Laser Ablation and Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients Undergoing Truncal Endovenous Laser Ablation for Lower Limb Varicose Veins

Endovenous laser ablation vs phlebectomy of foot varicose veins

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of selected patients treated with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) or ambulatory phlebectomy for foot varicose veins.

METHODS

From October 2016 to February 2022, selected patients undergoing EVLA (using 1470-nm with radial-slim or bare-tip fibers) or phlebectomy of foot varicose veins for cosmetic indications were analyzed, and the outcomes were compared. Patients were classified according to the Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. Anatomic criteria provided the basis for the decision to perform EVLA or phlebectomy. Clinical and ultrasound assessments were performed on postoperative days 7, 30, and 90 for visualization of the sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal junctions and the deep venous system. Disease severity was graded with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and quality of life was measured with the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) before and after treatment. Treatment outcomes were evaluated based on changes in VCSS and AVVQ scores. The groups were also compared for procedure-related complications. Data were statistically analyzed in SPSS v. 20.0 using the χ2, Student t test, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, and analysis of variance. The results were presented as mean (standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

The study included 270 feet of 171 patients. Mean patient age was 52.3 (standard deviation, 13.1) years, ranging from 21 to 84 years; 133 (77.8%) were women. Of 270 feet, 113 (41.9%) were treated with EVLA and 157 (58.1%) with phlebectomy. The median preoperative CEAP class was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3) in the phlebectomy and EVLA groups, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = .507). Dysesthesia was the most common complication in both groups. Only transient induration was significantly different between EVLA (7.1%) and phlebectomy (0.0%) (P = .001). The two approaches had an equal impact on quality of life and disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment complications were similar in phlebectomy and EVLA and to those previously described in the literature.

Safety and Efficacy of Combining Saphenous Endovenous Laser Ablation and Varicose Veins Foam Sclerotherapy: An Analysis on 5500 Procedures in Patients With Advance Chronic Venous Disease (C3-C6)

BACKGROUND

endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) represents the gold standard in treating both great and small saphenous veins (GSV and SSV) incompetence. To achieve a "no-scalpel" procedure in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI, CEAP C3-C6), concomitant phlebectomies could be replaced by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) into varicose tributaries. The aim of this study is to present a single-centre experience on EVLA + UGFS for patients with CVI secondary to varicose veins and saphenous trunk incompetence, analysing ling-term outcomes.

METHODS

all consecutive patients with CVI and treated by EVLA + UGFS from 2010 to 2022 were included in the analysis. EVLA was performed using a 1470-nm diode laser (LASEmaR® 1500, Eufoton, Trieste, Italy), adapting the linear endovenous energy density (LEED) depending on saphenous trunk diameter. Tessari method was used for UGFS. Patients were evaluated clinically and by duplex scanning at 1, 3 and 6 months, and annually up to 4 years, to assess treatment efficacy and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

5500 procedures in 4895 patients (3818 women, 1077 men) with a mean age of 51.4 years were analysed during the study period. A total of 3950 GSVs and 1550 SSVs were treated with EVLA + UGFS (C3 59%, C4 23%, C5 17% and C6 1%). Neither deep vein thrombosis nor pulmonary embolism were detected during follow-up, as well as superficial burns. Ecchymoses (7%), transitory paraesthesia (2%), palpable vein induration/superficial vein thrombosis (15%) and transient dyschromia (1%) were registered. Saphenous and tributaries closure rate at 30 days, 1 and 4 years were 99.1%, 98.3% and 97.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EVLA + UGFS for an extremely minimally invasive procedure appears to be a safe technique, with only minor effects and acceptable long-term outcomes, in patients with CVI. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the role of this combined therapy in such patients.

Brazilian guidelines on chronic venous disease of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery

The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery has set up a committee to provide new evidence-based recommendations for patient care associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Topics were divided in five groups: 1. Classification, 2. Diagnosis, 3. Conservative or non-invasive treatment, 4. Invasive treatment and 5. Treatment of small vessels. This last series is closely related to the activities of Brazilian angiologists and vascular surgeons, who are heavily involved in the treatment of small superficial veins. These guidelines are intended to assist in clinical decision-making for attending physicians and health managers. The decision to follow a guideline recommendation should be made by the responsible physician on a case-by-case basis taking into account the patient's specific condition, as well as local resources, regulations, laws, and clinical practice recommendations.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of tributary varicose veins using a slim-type radial fiber

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of tributary varicose veins using a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber.

METHODS

One thousand consecutive patients who underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins were included. The tributary varicose veins were punctured with a 16G venule needle and ablated with a 1470 nm laser system and a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber with a diameter of 1.27 mm. The EVLA was performed with a power of 5W and linear endovenous energy density of around 30 J/cm.

RESULTS

Percutaneous varicose ablation was safely performed in 939 legs with an average of 5.9 times punctures per leg. No skin burn or nerve injury was observed after varicose ablation. Ultrasonography revealed complete occlusion of the treated veins 1 month after EVLA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that percutaneous varicose ablation with a slim-type radial 2-ring fiber is a safe and effective alternative to cover the weak point of ambulatory phlebectomy.

Combined microfoam sclerotherapy and miniphlebectomy as an optimal method of treating varicose vein tributaries after endovenous laser ablation

Introduction. The development of phlebology and mainstreaming of ultrasonic techniques has led to the emergence of microfoam sclerotherapy, which proved itself as a more effective technique. In the world literature, there are isolated publications that say about the effectiveness and safety of the microfoam sclerotherapy combined with mini-phlebectomy, but no specific studies comparing the combination treatment for the elimination of varicose syndrome with separate use of each of the techniques are described.

Aim. To increase the effectiveness of invasive treatment and to reduce the rate of complications in patients with varicose veins using a combination of microfoam sclerotherapy and mini-phlebectomy of tributaries after endovenous laser ablation.

Material and methods. Simple single- center, non-randomized, retrospective study was conducted at the A.K. Eramishantsev Moscow State Hospital. It included 52 patients with varicose veins (a total of 77  lower  limbs, 22 patients had bilateral disease), who had no previous invasive treatment for this disease. They underwent endovenous laser ablation of truncal vein combined with microfoam sclerotherapy and mini-phlebectomy of tributaries. Microfoam sclerotherapy was performed with 0.5–2.0% of polidocanol foam, and mini-phlebectomy per Varady technique. The patients had a postprocedural follow-up clinical examination and duplex ultrasound the day after the intervention, then at 1, 6, and 12 months.

Results. Endovenous laser ablation of truncal veins was acutely successful in all cases. No cases of great saphenous vein recanalization were detected in follow-up period. In the early postprocedural period, the combined microfoam sclerotherapy and miniphlebectomy also showed 100% success rate, however redo sclerotherapy was required in 4 (5.2%) cases for new varicose tributaries developed in late postprocedural period.

Conclusion. Combined microfoam sclerotherapy and mini-phlebectomy, as a method of treatment for various veins syndrome, can provide additional benefit such as reducing the volume of mini-phlebectomy and the resultant tissue damage, the varicosity recurrence rate, the number of subcutaneous hematomas and ecchymoses, the discomfort of the tumescent anesthesia, the risk of postprocedural varicose veins thrombosis and pigmentation rate.

Recovery and patient satisfaction following radiofrequency ablation and concomitant foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins with and without compression: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Background

The benefits of postoperative compression are not well established following radiofrequency ablation of the truncal vein and concomitant foam sclerotherapy.

Methods

A total of 104 patients were randomized: Postoperatively, 54 patients received no compression and 50 patients received class II thigh-high compression. The primary outcome for this study was the difference between means on postoperative pain scores over the first 10 days follow-up measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm (prespecified delta 10 mm).

Results

The difference between means in no compression and compression group on postoperative pain scores over the 10 days follow-up was 2.1 mm (95% confidence interval −5.1–9.3 mm; p = 0.28) indicating non-inferiority. Patients in the no compression group were more satisfied with the visual appearance of the treated leg at 1 month ( p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Over the first 10 postoperative days, no compression was non-inferior to compression on pain scores.

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transluminal injection of foam sclerotherapy compared with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy during endovenous catheter ablation in patients with varicose veins

OBJECTIVE

We compared the safety, need for additional foam sclerotherapy, and 1-year venous clinical severity score (VCSS) improvement in the limbs of patients with chronic venous disease and great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. These patients had undergone endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) using a 1470-nm diode laser and concurrent foam sclerotherapy (1% polidocanol) through the access sheath (transluminal injection of foam sclerotherapy [TLFS]) or EVLA and concurrent direct-puncture ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS).

METHODS

In the present study, we screened 467 patients (577 legs) with symptomatic primary GSV reflux for randomization to either TLFS with EVLA (n = 103 legs; TLFS group) or UGFS with EVLA (n = 94 legs; UGFS group). The exclusion criteria were (1) recurrent varicose veins after previous intervention; (2) hypersensitivity reaction to sclerotherapy; (3) acute deep vein thrombosis; (4) serious lower limb ischemic disease; (5) a coagulation disorder; and (6) simultaneous EVLA of both GSVs and small saphenous veins. The correlations of the VCSS changes with the clinical features, such as age, sex, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, total amount of sclerosant used at the original procedure, multiple punctures (more than two) for sclerotherapy at the original procedure, the use of TLFS, and linear endovenous energy density, were estimated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the distribution of the CEAP classification were observed between the two groups. After 12 months of follow-up, all truncal veins were occluded. The VCSS had significantly improved in the TLFS group compared with the UGFS group (UGFS, -7.4 ± 1.8; TLFS, -8.7 ± 1.5; P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that TLFS was the only significant factor for an improved VCSS (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.96; P < .0001). The need for additional second-stage sclerotherapy was significantly avoided in the TLFS group (n = 10; 10%) compared with the UGFS group (n = 51; 54%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TLFS combined with EVLA is a safe and feasible procedure that improves the VCSS and reduces the need for additional second-stage interventions compared with UGFS combined with EVLA.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is safe and effective in the management of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity

BACKGROUND

Superficial venous disease of the lower extremity has a significant impact on quality of life. Both truncal and tributary vein reflux contribute to this disease process. Endovenous foam sclerotherapy is a widely used technique throughout the world for the management of superficial venous reflux and ultrasound guidance improves its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

A PubMed search for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) was conducted and all abstracts were reviewed to identify clinical trials and systematic reviews for a full-text analysis. Additional articles were also identified through searching the references of the selected studies.

RESULTS

The production of foam for sclerotherapy in a 1:3 or 1:4 ratio of air to sclerosant is optimal in a low silicone, low-volume syringe system. Physiologic gas may decrease any side effects, with the trade-off of decreased foam stability. Proper technique with appropriate sterility and cleansing protocols are paramount for safe and effective treatment. The technical success of UGFS for great saphenous vein disease is inferior to endothermal and surgical modalities and retreatment is more common. However, the clinical improvement in patient-reported quality of life is similar between these three modalities. When used for tributary veins in combination with endothermal approaches of the truncal veins, UGFS has high rates of success with excellent patient satisfaction. UGFS has demonstrated an excellent safety profile comparable with or superior to other modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper technique, UGFS is safe and effective for the management of superficial venous disease.

GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN OCCLUSION RATES AFTER COMBINED TREATMENT WITH LASER AND FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY

BACKGROUND

Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) and foam sclerotherapy are effective and safe treatments for chronic venous disease (CVD) with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. We report our experience combining both strategies as a merged approach to treat GSV incompetence to potentiate both methods' superiority and benefits. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

246 limbs with great saphenous vein incompetence (C2-C6) treated with EVLA and foam sclerotherapy between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes of interest were the International Union of Phlebology type of anatomic closure (primary, primary assisted, secondary and therapeutic failure), identified with ultrasound in the GSV after the procedure. Clinical and ultrasound follow-up was conducted at two weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention. We utilized Fisher's exact test to determine the significance of the association between the type of anatomic closure and the clinical stage according to the CEAP classification.

RESULTS

67% of the treated limbs were C2-C4 and 33% C5-C6. International Union of Phlebology (IUP) primary closure was achieved in 229 limbs (93%), IUP primary assisted closure in 10 (4%), IUP secondary closure in 1 (0.4%), with therapeutic failure in 6 limbs (2%). Forty-five limbs (18%) required microthrombectomies of tributary veins due to local induration, 7 (2.8%) developed dyschromia, 4 (1.6%) had type 1 Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis (E-HIT1), and one limb (0.4%) developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which was successfully treated with anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a high occlusion rate of incompetent GSVs with combined EVLA and foam sclerotherapy with infrequent non-serious complications and one case of subclinical isolated popliteal DVT. Combined therapy effectiveness and safety are comparable with other endovenous treatments for CVD with GSV reflux. The use of both thermal and chemical ablation combines the benefits of both techniques.

Efficacy and safety of polidocanol in the treatment of varicose veins of lower extremities: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The varicose veins of the lower extremities showed earthworm-like dilatation and venous protrusion of the lower extremities. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy, as a minimally invasive treatment with rapid recovery, less trauma and not easy to relapse, has achieved good results in clinical, but it is lack of evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polidocanol in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities by meta-analysis.

METHOD

Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientifific Journals Database, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, EMBASE database, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library will be used as search sources to conduct for randomized controlled trials of polidocanol in the treatment of varicose veins of lower extremities. The search time is set from the establishment of the database in December 2020 in this study. Two researchers independently extract, delete files, extract data and evaluate the quality. Revman software version 5.3 will be used for statistical analysis of data.

RESULT

In this study, the efficacy and safety of polidocanol in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities will be evaluated in terms of total effective rate, incidence of complications and recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of polidocanol in the treatment of varicose veins of lower extremities.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also does not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval will not be required. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated at relevant conferences.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/AUR4X.

Feasibility and potential significance of prophylactic ablation of the major ascending tributaries in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein: A case series

Background

Recurrent varicosities after endovascular laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) are frequently due to varicose transformed, initially unsealed major ascending tributaries of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Preventive ablation of these veins, especially the anterior accessory saphenous vein, is discussed as an option, along with flush occlusion of the GSV. However, few related data exist to date.

Methods

A consecutive case series of 278 EVLA procedures of the GSV for primary varicosis in 213 patients between May and December 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. The ablations were performed with a 1470 nm dual-ring radial laser and always included flush occlusion of the GSV, and concomitant ablation of its highest ascending tributaries by additional cannulation and ablation when this seemed anatomically appropriate. The initial technical success, comprising occlusion of the GSV and its major tributaries, was set as the primary endpoint. Possible determinants were explored using downstream multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The early technical success was 92.8%, with the GSV occluded in 99.6% and the highest ascending SFJ tributary, if present, in 92.4%. Additional ablations of ascending tributaries were performed in 171 cases (61.5%), the latter being associated with success (OR 10.39; 95% CI [3.420–36.15]; p < 0.0001). Presence of anterior as opposed to posterior accessory saphenous vein was another positive predictor (OR 3.959; 95% CI [1.142–13,73]; p = 0.027), while a confluence of the tributary in the immediate proximity to the SFJ had a negative impact (OR 0.2253; 95% CI [0.05456–0.7681]; p = 0.0253). An endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ grade 2 was observed in three cases (1.1%).

Conclusions

A co-treatment of the tributaries is feasible and could improve the technical success of EVLA if a prophylactic closure of these veins is desired, especially if their distance to the SFJ is short. Its effect on the recurrence rate needs further research.

Concomitant vs. Staged Treatment of Varicose Tributaries as an Adjunct to Endovenous Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This review compares the outcomes of both concomitant and staged superficial varicose tributary (SVT) interventions as an adjunct to endovenous truncal ablation.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline through Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was last performed in November 2019. All studies comparing the outcomes of both concomitant and staged treatments for SVT as an adjunct to endovenous truncal ablation were included. Each included study was subject to an evaluation of methodological quality using the Downs and Black assessment tool. Outcomes assessed included rates of re-intervention, complications, and thrombotic events. Quality of life (QOL) and disease severity were also analysed. Data were pooled with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (6 915 limbs) were included for analysis. Included studies were of reasonable methodological quality. Re-intervention rates were significantly lower in the concomitant group (6.3% vs. 36.1%) when compared with staged intervention (relative risk [RR] 0.21 [95% CI 0.07-0.62], p = .004, I² = 90%, p ≤ .001). Reported complications (RR 1.14 [95% CI 0.67-1.93], p = .64) and rates of deep venous thrombosis (RR 1.41 [95% CI 0.72-2.77] p = .31) were similar in each group. Overall disease severity (Venous Clinical Severity Score) was lower in the concomitant group (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.97- -0.35] p = .005), while QOL, assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, favoured concomitant treatment when measured at less than three months (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.6 [95% CI, -7.17- -0.03] p = .050) and between three and 12 months (WMD -1.61 [95% CI, -2.99- -0.23] p = .020).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant and staged treatments are safe and effective. Improvements in early disease severity and QOL scores were better in the concomitant group. While meta-analysis suggests that concomitant intervention offers significantly lower rates of re-intervention, studies assessing its merits are subject to some biases. This benefit was not reflected by the randomised trial subgroup analysis, which identified no difference in re-intervention.

Update of the SFMV (French society of vascular medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues

Venous insufficiency is a very common disease affecting about 25% of the French population (if we combine all stages of its progression). It is a complex disease and its aetiology has not yet been fully elucidated. Some of its causes are well known, such as valvular dysfunction, vein wall defect, and the suctioning effect common to all varicose veins. These factors are generally associated and together lead to dysfunction of one or more of the saphenous veins. Saphenous vein dysfunction is revealed by ultrasound scan, a reflux lasting more than 0.5 seconds indicating venous incompetence. The potential consequences of saphenous vein dysfunction over time include: symptoms (heaviness, swellings, restlessness, cramps, itching of the lower limbs), acute complications (superficial venous thrombosis, varicose bleeding), chronic complications (changes in skin texture and colour, stasis dermatitis, eczema, vein atresia, leg ulcer), and appearance of unaesthetic varicose veins. It is not possible to repair an incompetent saphenous vein. The only therapeutic options at present are ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, physical removal of the vein (saphenous stripping), or its thermal ablation (by laser or radiofrequency treatment), the latter strategy having now become the gold standard as recommended by international guidelines. Recommendations concerning thermal ablation of saphenous veins were published in 2014 by the Société française de médecine vasculaire. Our society has now decided to update these recommendations, taking this opportunity to discuss unresolved issues and issues not addressed in the original guidelines. Thermal ablation of an incompetent saphenous vein consists in destroying this by means of a heating element introduced via ultrasound-guided venous puncture. The heating element comprises either a laser fibre or a radiofrequency catheter. The practitioner must provide the patient with full information about the procedure and obtain his/her consent prior to its implementation. The checklist concerning the interventional procedure issued by the HAS should be validated for each patient (see the appended document).

Effect of Transluminal Injection of Foam Sclerotherapy Combined with Endovenous Thermal Ablation of Varicose Veins

Objective

The combination of endovenous therapies with stab avulsion or ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy is widely performed. However, these conventional techniques tend to result in incomplete avulsions or persistent varicosities.

Methods

One hundred and thirteen legs in 97 consecutive patients who underwent 1470 nm laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins were enrolled. The foam sclerosing agent was injected via the sheath after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Patients were divided into two groups: EVLA only group (Control; n = 50) and EVLA and transluminal injection of foam sclerotherapy (TLFS) group (SCL; n = 63).

Results

At three month follow up, reflux was abolished throughout all treated great saphenous veins (GSVs) when assessed with Duplex ultrasound. Thrombophlebitis was observed in two patients in the SCL group (p = .13). Additional second stage sclerotherapy was needed in the Control group (n = 33, 66%) vs. SCL group (n = 2, 3%; p < .0001). The venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was significantly improved in the SCL group (changes of VCSS, Control −3.3 ± 1.7 and SCL -4.4 ± 1.0; p < .0001). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that, among age, sex, Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classification, linear endovenous energy density, and TLFS, TLFS was the only significant factor of improved VCSS (hazard ratio = −0.96; 95% confidence interval = −1.4 to −0.58; p < .0001).

Conclusions

TLFS combined with EVLA may be an easy, safe, and effective procedure with acceptable complications vs. EVLA alone and reduces additional second stage interventions.

•

Stab avulsion tends to result in incomplete avulsions.

•

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy also tends to result in non-sclerotic vessels.

•

Foam sclerosing agent injected via the sheath covers the whole varicose vein.

•

Transluminal foam sclerotherapy improves VCSS and reduces additional interventions.

Post-procedural Compression vs. No Compression After Radiofrequency Ablation and Concomitant Foam Sclerotherapy of Varicose Veins: A Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare post-operative compression with no compression, after radiofrequency endothermal ablation (RFA) of a truncal varicose vein and concomitant foam sclerotherapy of the tributaries.

METHODS

This prospective randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial recruited patients from two centres in Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland. Patients with clinical class C2-C4 chronic venous disease were randomised to receive no compression after the operation, or to receive compression stockings continuously for two days, and then, during the daytime for five days. In follow up visits, additional foam sclerotherapy was performed for symptoms of distal incompetence. Patients were followed up for six months. The primary outcome was occlusion of the RFA treated truncal vein at six months. Secondary outcomes were return to full activity within 14 days, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, post-operative pain, need for painkillers, and postprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Of 177 included patients, 90 were allocated to post-operative compression and 87 to no compression. At six months, both groups showed 100% occlusion rates in RFA treated truncal veins (95% confidence interval -0.043-0.042). Within 14 days of treatment, full physical activity was achieved by 87% of the compression group and 81% of the no compression group, (p = .29). At six months, the AVVQ scores were comparable and significantly improved in both groups, compared with baseline. Pain scores were comparable between groups, in day to day analyses, and they were significantly lower in both groups on day 10, compared with pre-operative pain caused by varicose veins. On average, post-operative pain medication was used for 2.3 days and for 2.8 days in the compression and no compression groups, respectively (p = .28). Complications throughout the six month follow up were comparable between groups, although skin rash/blisters occurred more often in the compression group (p = .01).

CONCLUSION

After treating C2-C4 varicose veins with RFA and concomitant foam sclerotherapy, no post-operative compression was non-inferior to post-operative compression, in terms of safety and efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890563.

Short Term Outcome of Adjunct Foam Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins in Patients Subjected to RFA at Dhulikhel Hospital, Nepal

Background

Varicose veins are dilated, tortuous, superficial veins usually seen on lower limbs. Various surgical modalities are available for varicose veins including open surgery (Trendelenburg operation), Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Sclerotherapy. The aim of this study is to look for the outcome of adjunct sclerotherapy for varicose veins done as an adjunct with Radio Frequency Ablation.

Objective

To know the possible outcome regarding benefits and complications of adjunct sclerotherapy with Radio Frequency Ablation.

Methodology

We combined Radio Frequency Ablation of varicose veins with necessary phlebectomy and perforator ligation and performed adjunct sclerotherapy for residual significant varicosities with polidocanol (2%) mixed with 2 ml NS and 2 cc of air (Tessari method) to patients undergoing varicose vein surgery in between 2016 and 2017. Records on complications were enquired immediately following surgery and on 1^st follow up done within 3-5 days of the procedure.

Results

Among 256 limbs subjected to varicose veins surgery 51 limbs were given adjunct sclerotherapy. Among them, five limbs had perivenous spillage with some localized swelling while there was allergic reaction in one patient as immediate postprocedural complication. Nine limbs had painful thrombosed veins during early follow-up.

Conclusions

Adjunct sclerotherapy showed complication rate of roughly one tenth and one fifth of the treated cases in immediate and early postoperative follow-up.