Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Chronic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study

Factors Associated With Early and Late Restenosis Following Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients With Femoropopliteal Lesions

PURPOSE

Clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) to noncoated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. In those trials, the difference of primary patency between DCB and noncoated angioplasty widens especially after 6 months, speculating that the antirestenosis effect of paclitaxel is manifested after 6 months. Factors associated with restenosis after 6 months differ from those associated with restenosis within 6 months. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors associated with early (within 6 months) and late (after 6 months) restenosis following DCB treatment in real-world FP practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed 486 FP lesions (mean lesion length, 11.9±10.1 cm; chronic total occlusion, 21.0%) in 423 patients (diabetes mellitus, 59.3%; hemodialysis, 37.1%; chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 41.6%) who underwent successful DCB treatment between January 2018 and December 2019. The outcome measure was restenosis which is defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 based on duplex ultrasound findings. Early and late restenosis were classified by the cutoff period of 6 months after the procedure. The associations of baseline and procedural characteristics with early and late restenosis were explored using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 25.3±12.1 months. The 6, 12, 18, and 24 month cumulative incidences of restenosis were 7.4%±2.4%, 20.9%±3.9%, 29.9%±4.5%, and 38.4%±5.1%, respectively. During the follow-up period, early and late restenosis was evident in a total of 31 lesions and 138 lesions, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that chronic total occlusion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.92; p=0.033) and superficial femoral artery ostial lesion (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.28-5.80; p=0.009) were significantly associated with early restenosis. On the other hand, calcification circumference over 270° (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.17-2.37; p=0.004), distal external elastic membrane diameter under 5 mm assessed by intravascular ultrasound (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.79; p=0.001), and involving popliteal arterial lesion (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.21; p=0.017) were significantly associated with late restenosis.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic factors associated with late restenosis differed from those associated with early restenosis in the real-world FP-DCB practice.Clinical ImpactThe current multicenter, retrospective study revealed that factors associated with early restenosis differed from those with late restenosis in the real-world FP-DCB practice. CTO and SFA ostial lesion were associated with early restenosis, while severe calcification, smaller vessel, and involving popliteal arterial lesions were associated with late restenosis.Early restenosis indicates "balloon failure" and would potentially result from recoil, which primary stent implantation might be required. On the other hand, late restenosis after 6 months would be attributed to "DCB failure", with inadequate drug uptake into the arterial wall, which might be minimized by the use of atherectomy devices.

Treatment Options in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease

Isolated popliteal artery (PA) lesions account for around 1% of lower limb revascularisations. Whatever treatment modality is chosen, the effects on the artery during knee flexion must be considered. The decision between a less invasive endovascular treatment (EVT) and traditional open interventions remains complex due to anatomical, biomechanical, and pathophysiological considerations and the varying aetiology of PA lesions. Available data remain limited, making it more challenging to decide on the most effective and durable treatment approach. Nowadays, when EVT is planned, several non-stenting techniques are available, making a "leave-nothing-behind strategy" possible after adequate vessel preparation. If stent implantation is required, self-expanding vasculomimetic stents are preferred due to their ability to provide flexibility and resist compression during motion. This narrative review discusses the available treatment options, challenges, and specific considerations for isolated PA disease, highlighting the need for large-scale, high-quality studies to provide more robust evidence on the optimal treatment approach.

Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Popliteal Artery Disease: K-POP Registry 12-Month Results

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The popliteal artery is generally regarded as a "no-stent zone." Limited data are available on the outcomes of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for popliteal artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month clinical outcomes among patients who received DCB treatment for atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter registry study enrolled 100 patients from 7 Korean endovascular centers who underwent endovascular therapy using IN.PACT DCB (Medtronic) for symptomatic atherosclerotic popliteal artery disease. The primary endpoint was 12-month clinical primary patency and the secondary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free rate.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study cohort was 65.7±10.8 years, and 77% of enrolled patients were men. The mean lesion length was 93.7±53.7 mm, and total occlusions were present in 45% of patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Combined atherectomy was performed in 17% and provisional stenting was required in 11%. Out of the enrolled patients, 91 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. Clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival rates at 12 months were 76.0% and 87.2%, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified female and longer lesion length as the significant independent predictors of loss of patency.

CONCLUSIONS

DCB treatment yielded favorable 12-month clinical primary patency and TLR-free survival outcomes in patients with popliteal artery disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698345.

Long-Term Patient Outcomes After Femoropopliteal Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients With Intermittent Claudication

BACKGROUND

In patients with intermittent claudication (IC), short-term amputation rates from clinical trial data following lower extremity femoropopliteal (FP) peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) are <1% with unknown longer-term rates.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify revascularization and amputation rates following PVI in the FP segment and to assess 4-year amputation and revascularization rates after FP PVI for IC.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 19,324 patients undergoing FP PVI for IC were included from the PINC AI Healthcare Database and evaluated by treatment level (superficial femoral artery [SFA], popliteal artery [POP], or both). The primary outcome was index limb amputation (ILA) assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimate. The secondary outcomes were index limb major amputation and repeat revascularization. HRs were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

The 4-year index limb amputation rate following FP PVI was 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0-4.7), with a major amputation rate of 3.2% (95% CI: 2.9-3.5). After POP PVI, ILA was significantly higher than SFA alone (7.5% vs 3.4%) or both segment PVI (5.5%). In multivariate analysis, POP PVI was associated with higher ILA rates at 4 years compared with isolated SFA PVI (HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.52-2.91) and index limb major amputation (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.32-2.95). Repeat FP revascularization rates were 15.2%; they were highest in patients undergoing both SFA and POP PVI (18.7%; P < 0.0001) compared with SFA (13.9%) and POP (17.1%) only.

CONCLUSIONS

IC patients undergoing FP PVI had 4-year rates of index limb repeat revascularization of 16.7% and ILA rates of 4.3%. Further risk factors for amputation requires further investigation.

Advances in Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease: Revascularization in PAD

Effective revascularization of the patient with peripheral artery disease is about more than the procedure. The approach to the patient with symptom-limiting intermittent claudication or limb-threatening ischemia begins with understanding the population at risk and variation in clinical presentation. The urgency of revascularization varies significantly by presentation; from patients with intermittent claudication who should undergo structured exercise rehabilitation before revascularization (if needed) to those with acute limb ischemia, a medical emergency, who require revascularization within hours. Recent years have seen the rapid development of new tools including wires, catheters, drug-eluting technology, specialized balloons, and biomimetic stents. Open surgical bypass remains an important option for those with advanced disease. The strategy and techniques employed vary by clinical presentation, lesion location, and lesion severity. There is limited level 1 evidence to guide practice, but factors that determine technical success and anatomic durability are largely understood and incorporated into decision-making. Following revascularization, medical therapy to reduce adverse limb outcomes and a surveillance plan should be put in place. There are many hurdles to overcome to improve the efficacy of lower extremity revascularization, such as restenosis, calcification, microvascular disease, silent embolization, and tools for perfusion assessment. This review highlights the current state of revascularization in peripheral artery disease with an eye toward technologies at the cusp, which may significantly impact current practice.