Independence and mobility after infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia

Post-operative transfusion is associated with infrainguinal bypass graft failure: contemporary Australian tertiary centre experience

BACKGROUNDS

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an increasingly prevalent and highly morbid pathology affecting the older population. Infra-inguinal bypass (IIB) surgery remains a robust revascularization option in these patients. This study aimed to identify modifiable predictors associated with graft patency and functional outcomes in contemporary Australian vascular surgical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing IIB between 2010 and 2020 at a tertiary vascular surgery centre in Australia was performed. Data regarding patient demographics, co-morbidities, pre-operative investigations, bypass characteristics, and discharge outcomes were collected. Surveillance ultrasound scans were reviewed to gain information on graft patency and compliance up to 2 years post-operatively. The primary outcome was graft failure. Secondary outcomes were mobility status and amputation-free survival at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 239 IIBs were performed on 207 patients during the 10-year period. Significant predictors for primary graft occlusion included regional referral (P < 0.01), low pre-operative haemoglobin level (P < 0.01), post-operative transfusion requirement (P = 0.02), use of prosthetic conduit (P < 0.01) and non-compliance to ultrasound surveillance (P < 0.01). Patients with a thrombosed graft were 2.4 times more likely to experience deterioration in mobility status (P < 0.01) and 8.6 times more likely to have major limb amputation or death at 1 year. The amputation-free survival was 88.3% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Optimization of pre-operative haemoglobin level for IIB should be advocated in clinical practice in order to reduce the risk of graft failure, deterioration in ambulatory function, major limb amputation and mortality.

Incidence and risk factors for pressure injuries in patients who have undergone vascular operations: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients who have undergone vascular operations are thought to be at an increased risk for developing pressure injuries; however, the extent to which pressure injuries occur in this population is not clear. This scoping review sought to summarize what is known about the incidence of pressure injuries, and the risk factors for the development of pressure injuries in patients who have undergone vascular operations. MAIN: An initial search identified 2564 articles, and 9 English language studies were included. Results showed that due to study design limitations in the available literature preventing hospital-acquired and present on admission pressure injuries to be distinguished, it is difficult to ascertain the incidence rate of pressure injuries in this population.

CONCLUSION

Certain vascular procedures were found to be higher risk for the development of pressure injuries such as major amputations and lower extremity bypass surgery. In addition to procedural risk factors, patient factors were identified that may be associated with the development of pressure injuries in the vascular population, and these in the authors' view deserve further exploration. Overall, this scoping review identified an area ripe for future research, the results of which would have implications for wound care in healthcare institutions and at home.

The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a widely acknowledged prognostic model to estimate preoperatively the probability of developing in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, the RCRI does not always make accurate predictions, so various studies have investigated whether biomarkers added to or compared with the RCRI could improve this.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: To investigate the added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Secondary: To investigate the prognostic value of biomarkers compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tertiary: To investigate the prognostic value of other prediction models compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1 January 1999 (the year that the RCRI was published) until 25 June 2020. We also searched ISI Web of Science and SCOPUS for articles referring to the original RCRI development study in that period.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies among adults who underwent noncardiac surgery, reporting on (external) validation of the RCRI and: - the addition of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of the RCRI to other models. Besides MACE, all other adverse outcomes were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We developed a data extraction form based on the CHARMS checklist. Independent pairs of authors screened references, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability according to PROBAST. For biomarkers and prediction models that were added or compared to the RCRI in ≥ 3 different articles, we described study characteristics and findings in further detail. We did not apply GRADE as no guidance is available for prognostic model reviews.

MAIN RESULTS

We screened 3960 records and included 107 articles.   Over all objectives we rated risk of bias as high in ≥ 1 domain in 90% of included studies, particularly in the analysis domain. Statistical pooling or meta-analysis of reported results was impossible due to heterogeneity in various aspects: outcomes used, scale by which the biomarker was added/compared to the RCRI, prediction horizons and studied populations.  Added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI Fifty-one studies reported on the added value of biomarkers to the RCRI. Sixty-nine different predictors were identified derived from blood (29%), imaging (33%) or other sources (38%). Addition of NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination improved the RCRI for predicting MACE (median delta c-statistics: 0.08, 0.14 and 0.12 for NT-proBNP, troponin and their combination, respectively). The median total net reclassification index (NRI) was 0.16 and 0.74 after addition of troponin and NT-proBNP to the RCRI, respectively. Calibration was not reported. To predict myocardial infarction, the median delta c-statistic when NT-proBNP was added to the RCRI was 0.09, and 0.06 for prediction of all-cause mortality and MACE combined. For BNP and copeptin, data were not sufficient to provide results on their added predictive performance, for any of the outcomes. Comparison of the predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI  Fifty-one studies assessed the predictive performance of biomarkers alone compared to the RCRI. We identified 60 unique predictors derived from blood (38%), imaging (30%) or other sources, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (32%). Predictions were similar between the ASA classification and the RCRI for all studied outcomes. In studies different from those identified in objective 1, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 and 0.12 in favour of  BNP and NT-proBNP alone, respectively, when compared to the RCRI, for the prediction of MACE. For C-reactive protein, the predictive performance was similar to the RCRI. For other biomarkers and outcomes, data were insufficient to provide summary results. One study reported on calibration and none on reclassification. Comparison of the predictive value of other prognostic models to the RCRI   Fifty-two articles compared the predictive ability of the RCRI to other prognostic models. Of these, 42% developed a new prediction model, 22% updated the RCRI, or another prediction model, and 37% validated an existing prediction model. None of the other prediction models showed better performance in predicting MACE than the RCRI. To predict myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest, ACS-NSQIP-MICA had a higher median delta c-statistic of 0.11 compared to the RCRI. To predict all-cause mortality, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 higher in favour of ACS-NSQIP-SRS compared to the RCRI. Predictive performance was not better for CHADS₂, CHA₂DS₂-VASc, R₂CHADS₂, Goldman index, Detsky index or VSG-CRI compared to the RCRI for any of the outcomes. Calibration and reclassification were reported in only one and three studies, respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Studies included in this review suggest that the predictive performance of the RCRI in predicting MACE is improved when NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination are added. Other studies indicate that BNP and NT-proBNP, when used in isolation, may even have a higher discriminative performance than the RCRI. There was insufficient evidence of a difference between the predictive accuracy of the RCRI and other prediction models in predicting MACE. However, ACS-NSQIP-MICA and ACS-NSQIP-SRS outperformed the RCRI in predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest combined, and all-cause mortality, respectively. Nevertheless, the results cannot be interpreted as conclusive due to high risks of bias in a majority of papers, and pooling was impossible due to heterogeneity in outcomes, prediction horizons, biomarkers and studied populations. Future research on the added prognostic value of biomarkers to existing prediction models should focus on biomarkers with good predictive accuracy in other settings (e.g. diagnosis of myocardial infarction) and identification of biomarkers from omics data. They should be compared to novel biomarkers with so far insufficient evidence compared to established ones, including NT-proBNP or troponins. Adherence to recent guidance for prediction model studies (e.g. TRIPOD; PROBAST) and use of standardised outcome definitions in primary studies is highly recommended to facilitate systematic review and meta-analyses in the future.

The Effect of Frailty on Long Term Outcomes in Vascular Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is a multidimensional vulnerability due to age associated decline. The impact of frailty on long term outcomes was assessed in a cohort of vascular surgical patients.

METHODS

Patients aged over 65 years with a length of stay greater than two days admitted to a tertiary vascular unit over a single calendar year were included. Demographics, mode of admission, and diagnosis were recorded alongside a variety of frailty specific characteristics. Using the previously developed Addenbrookes Vascular Frailty Score (AVFS - 6 point score: anaemia on admission, lack of independent mobility, polypharmacy, Waterlow score > 13, depression, and emergency admission) the effect of frailty on five year mortality and re-admission rates was assessed using multivariable regression techniques. The AVFS was further refined to assess longer term outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 410 patients (median age 77 years) were included and followed up until death or five years from the index admission. One hundred and thirty-four were treated for aortic aneurysm, 75 and 96 for acute and chronic limb ischaemia respectively, 52 for carotid disease, and 53 for other pathologies. The in hospital mortality rate was 3.6%. The one, three, and five year survival rates were 83%, 70% and 59%; and the one, three, and five year re-admission free survival rates were 47%, 29%, and 22% respectively. Independent predictors of five year mortality were age, lack of independent mobility, high Charlson score, polypharmacy, evidence of malnutrition, and emergency admission (p < .010 for all). Patients with AVFS 0 or 1 had restricted mean survival times which were one year longer than those with AVFS 2 or 3 (p < .001), who in turn had restricted mean survival times over one year longer than those with AVFS of 4 or more (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Frailty factors are strong predictors of long term outcomes in vascular surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted to investigate its utility in clinical decision making.

Arterial Reconstruction for Patients with Chronic Limb Ischemia Improves Ambulatory Function and Health-related Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Arterial reconstruction (AR) for limb ischemia may improve ambulatory function (AF) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). However, the efficacy of AR in terms of HR-QoL varies in studies, probably because of cohort differences in disease severity, hemodynamic outcomes, and observation duration. We assessed HR-QoL for patients with various severities of ischemia in a 3-year observational study.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center 3-year observational study using Short Form 36 in patients with chronic limb ischemia. Between 2001 and 2009, 515 consecutive patients had AR, and 330 who underwent elective AR consented to the study. Of the 330 patients (claudicants 49%, critical limb ischemia [CLI] 51%), 307 underwent bypass and 23 endovascular therapy. Postal questionnaires were sent after AR, and 8 domains, the physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores, and the patient-reported AF were compared, and negative predictors were identified.

RESULTS

Overall, the MCS was minimally affected, but AF and the PCS were impaired. After AR, these measures were significantly improved, and maximum recovery was attained at 6 months. In subgroup analysis, significant predictors of a negative impact on postoperative PCS included age ≥80, CLI, physical aftereffects of stroke (PAS), and previous major amputation (PMA). Of these, PMA was associated with the lowest PCS score, followed by PAS; for these patients, AR contributed minimally to HR-QoL recovery. PCS scores of claudicants attained a maximum value at 6 months; however, PCS scores of CLI patients were significantly lower than intermittent claudication patients (P < 0.0001), and patients with major tissue loss required 2 years to attain maximum PCS recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This 3-year observational study verified the efficacy of AR in improving AF and HR-QoL. Age ≥80, CLI, PAS, and PMA were definitive predictors, and for patients with the latter 2, AR contributed minimally to improving HR-QoL.

[The effect of spinal card stimulation on quality of life in patients with critical lower limb ischemia]

Today, there are insufficient data on the dynamics of quality of life (QoL) in patients with critical lower limb ischemia after spinal cord stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

To study the dynamics of QoL in patients with critical lower limb ischemia one year after spinal cord stimulation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

QoL analysis was performed in 43 patients with critical lower limb ischemia using the SF-36 questionnaire before and one year after spinal cord stimulation.

RESULTS

At baseline, we detected reduced QoL parameters corresponding to the physical function (≤30 points). The parameters of mental health corresponded to the moderate level (the score ranged between 42 and 59 points). The total score of physical well-being was reduced: 22.8 (20.2-29.3); the mean score of mental well-being was 41 (32.8-49.2) (p<0.001). One year after spinal cord stimulation, the level of all QoL parameters was increased but the total score of physical well-being remained low 33.2 (24-44.1). The mean score of mental well-being corresponded to the moderate level of QoL 56.5 (49-60.4) (p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the physical parameters of QoL after spinal cord stimulation are adversely affected by such factors as age, the history of stroke, the ankle-brachial index (ABI), the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and ischemic heart disease (IHD) in combination with stenosis of brachiocephalic arteries (BCA). The mental health is affected by age and the presence of stenosis of brachiocephalic arteries.

CONCLUSION

When selecting patients with critical lower limb ischemia for spinal cord stimulation, such factors as the baseline clinical status (comorbidities), age, history of stroke, and the severity of peripheral artery ischemia need to be taken into account to improve treatment effectiveness and QoL.

Fisioterapia intra-hospitalar para pacientes com isquemia crítica de membro inferior: consenso de especialistas

RESUMO A isquemia crítica de membro inferior (ICMI) gera impacto nos sistemas de saúde, na qualidade de vida e funcionalidade dos indivíduos diagnosticados. Entretanto, há pouca evidência científica que permita fundamentar a intervenção fisioterapêutica para pacientes internados por ICMI. O objetivo desse estudo foi elaborar um consenso de especialistas sobre a fisioterapia intra-hospitalar para pacientes com ICMI. Para tal, foi utilizado o método Delphi. Um painel de especialistas foi formado por 18 fisioterapeutas que representavam 85,7% da equipe de um hospital de referência em cirurgia vascular. Foram consideradas, para o consenso, as respostas com valor mínimo de concordância de 70% e média ou mediana ≥3,1 na escala Likert. Os questionários abordaram itens da avaliação, objetivos e condutas fisioterapêuticas nas fases pré e pós-cirurgia de revascularização. Definiram-se como itens essenciais a avaliação de sintomas, função cognitiva, musculoesquelética e cardiorrespiratória. Controle da dor, redução de edemas, ganho de amplitude de movimento, deambulação e educação em saúde são objetivos no pré-operatório e o ganho de força muscular na fase pós-operatória. Exercícios passivo, assistido, ativo livre e circulatório, incluindo os membros superiores, estão indicados antes e após as cirurgias. Educação em saúde e deambulação com redução de peso em área de lesão plantar são essenciais em todo o período de internação. A eletroanalgesia foi preconizada no pré-operatório e a elevação do membro inferior e exercícios resistidos no pós-operatório.

Functional prognosis of critical limb ischemia and efficacy of restoration of direct flow below the ankle

Objective

Patients with critical limb ischemia have serious systemic comorbidities and are at high risk of impairment of limb function. In this study, we assessed the prognostic factors of limbs after revascularization.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, from April 2008 to December 2012, we treated 154 limbs of 121 patients with critical limb ischemia by the endovascular therapy-first approach based on the patients’ characteristics. The primary end point was amputation-free survival. Secondary end points were patency of a revascularized artery, major adverse limb events, or death. Furthermore, we investigated the ambulatory status one year after revascularization as prognosis of limb function.

Results

Endovascular therapy was performed in 85 limbs in 65 patients as the initial therapy (endovascular therapy group) and surgical reconstructive procedures (bypass group) were performed in 69 limbs in 56 patients. Early mortality within 30 days was not observed in either group. The primary patency rate was significantly better in the bypass group than in the endovascular therapy group ( p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the secondary patency rate was similar between the two groups ( p = 0.0096). There were no significant differences in amputation-free survival and major adverse limb event between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that ulcer healing ( p < 0.0001), no hypoalbuminemia ( p = 0.0019), restoration of direct flow below the ankle ( p = 0.0219), no previous cerebrovascular disease ( p = 0.0389), and Rutherford 4 ( p = 0.0469) were predictive factors for preservation of ambulatory status one year after revascularization. In multivariate analysis, ulcer healing ( p < 0.0001) and restoration of direct flow below the ankle ( p = 0.0060) were significant predictors.

Conclusions

Ulcer healing and restoration of direct flow below the ankle are independently associated with prognosis of limb functions in patients who undergo infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.

Early rehabilitative treatment after infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery

Background and aim of the work:

Functional activity may remain limited in patients affected by critical limb ischemia, despite successful infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery (ILLBS). The aim of the work was to evaluate the impact of a rehabilitative intervention on postoperative ambulatory status and pain.

Methods:

In an observational study, data were collected on 34 patients undergoing ILLBS for critical limb ischemia or end-stage peripheral arterial disease. All patients underwent a postoperative rehabilitation program aimed at recovering gait autonomy. Information was collected on pre-operative comorbidities, ambulatory status (on admission to and discharge from hospital) and pain in the affected lower limb (on the first physiotherapy session and at discharge).

Results:

Before ILLBS, 61.8% of the patients walked independently without aids or assistance. The rehabilitative program started on average 5.7 (SD: 2.1) days after surgery. At discharge, 50% of the patients walked independently, 41.2% walked with aids and/or assistance and 8.8% were not able to walk. Overall, 76.5% of the sample recovered their pre-operative ambulatory status. Although pain tended to decrease, the difference at the first (1.5; SD: 2.6) and at the last treatment session (0.8; SD= 1.3) was not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

Our exercise protocol resulted to be easy to perform during hospital stay, with an overall favourable outcome for ambulatory status. Our results are in line with those reported in literature about the rates of postoperative dependence in walking, but appear to be slightly better in regards to the percentage of patients who recovered pre-operative ambulatory status. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Pre-operative predictors of poor outcomes in patients undergoing surgical lower extremity revascularisation - Retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical lower extremity revascularisation (LER) can lead to poor outcomes that include delayed hospital discharge, in-hospital mortality, major amputations and readmissions. The aim of this study was to identify pre-operative predictors associated with these poor clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients (n = 635; mean age 69; male 67.4%) who underwent surgical LER over a 5 year period in a single tertiary vascular institution were identified. Patients considered to have suffered a poor outcome (Group A) included all in-hospital mortality and major amputations, delayed discharges with a length of stay (LOS) over one standard deviation above the mean or any readmission under any specialty within 12 months. Group A included 247 patients (38.9%) and the good outcome group included the remaining 388 patients (61.1%) from which a sample of 99 patients were selected as controls (Group B).

RESULTS

Mean LOS for the entire study group was 14.4 ± 17.5 days, 12 month readmission rate was 29.1% and in-hospital mortality and major amputation rate was 2.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Pre-admission residence other than own home (OR 9.0; 95% CI 1.2-70.1; P = 0.036), atherosclerotic disease burden (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.8; P = 0.003) and tissue loss (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.6-5.3; P < 0.001) were identified as independent, statistically significant pre-operative predictors of poor outcome. Following discharge, group B patients had a significantly higher rate of amputation free survival and graft infection free survival (P < 0.001) compared to group A.

CONCLUSION

Recognition of pre-operative predictors of poor outcome should inform case selection and identify high risk patients requiring intensive perioperative optimisation and post discharge follow up.

Vascular interventions in the elderly

Overused?

Effect of frailty on short- and mid-term outcomes in vascular surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a multidimensional vulnerability resulting from age-associated decline. The impact of frailty on outcomes was assessed in a cohort of vascular surgical patients.

METHODS

The study included patients aged over 65 years with length of hospital stay (LOS) greater than 2 days, who were admitted to a tertiary vascular unit over a single calendar year. Demographics, mode of admission, diagnosis, mortality, LOS and discharge destination were recorded, as well as a variety of frailty-specific characteristics. The impact of frailty on LOS, discharge destination, survival and readmission rate was assessed using multivariable regression techniques. The ability of the models to predict these outcomes was also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 413 patients of median age 77 years were followed for a median of 18 (range 12-24) months. The in-hospital, 3- and 12-month mortality rates were 3·6, 8·5 and 13·8 per cent respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that frailty-based regression models were excellent predictors of 12-month mortality (area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0·81), prolonged LOS (AUC = 0·79) and discharge to a care institution (AUC = 0·84). A simple additive frailty score using six key features retained strong predictive power for 12-month mortality (AUC = 0·83), discharge to a care institution (AUC = 0·78) and prolonged LOS (AUC = 0·74). This frailty score was also strongly associated with readmission rates (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Frailty in vascular surgery patients predicts a multiplicity of poorer outcomes. Optimal management should include identification of at-risk patients and treatment of modifiable risk factors.