Endovascular stent grafting for ascending aorta diseases

Endovascular repair of a ruptured ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm with concomitant pericardiocentesis

Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of the ascending thoracic aorta are serious vascular conditions. Open surgical repair is the treatment of choice; however, some patients are deemed unfit for such invasive procedures. Endovascular repair can offer an invaluable and lifesaving treatment option, especially in emergent situations. We describe a case of a successful endovascular repair of a ruptured ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm in an 85-year-old man with cardiac tamponade who was not a candidate for traditional open surgery. Future innovations and applications of endovascular ascending aortic repair could lead to more favorable prognoses in patients with urgent surgical indications.

Dynamic Morphology of Dilated Ascending Aorta and its Implications for Proximal Landing During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

INTRODUCTION

To improve the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), we investigated the dynamic morphology of dilated and nondilated ascending aortas (AAs) to determine whether an appropriate proximal landing zone for TEVAR exists if the middle AA is dilated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with dilated (diameter 40-50 mm) and nondilated (<40 mm) AAs underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography of the entire AA in the systolic and diastolic phases. For each plane of each AA segment, the maximal and minimal diameters in systole and diastole were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were enrolled (54% male; median age: 80 years [IQR 78-85]). A total of 35 patients were included in the dilated AA group (DG), and 70 patients were included in the nondilated AA group (n-DG). The aortic planes of the AA segment at the sinotubular junction (STJ) showed a more oval-shaped morphology compared with the distal planes of the same segment (the differences between the maximum and minimum diameters were 8.9% to 9.4% and 4.8% to 5.6%, respectively). If the mid-ascending aorta was dilated, the aortic segment at the STJ showed a more pronounced reversed-funnel 3D morphology, with a 14% (IQR 11%-19%) difference in diameters between the proximal and distal segmental planes shown in the n-DG and 18% (IQR 16%-22%, p<0.001) in the DG.

CONCLUSION

If the middle AA is dilated, it is considered unsuitable to perform TEVAR using conventional endografts without additional proximal fixation in the aortic segment at the STJ due to its pronounced reversed-funnel segmental morphology. By contrast, the aortic segment at the brachiocephalic trunk seems to be promising for performing TEVAR using an endograft of the appropriate size and conformability. Moreover, endograft sizing using the average aortic diameter instead of the maximal AA diameter in an oval-shaped aortic plane morphology should be considered.

CLINICAL IMPACT

If the middle ascending aorta is dilated, it is considered unsuitable to perform TEVAR with a proximal landing in the aortic segment at the sinotubular junction due to its pronounced reversed-funnel segmental morphology and high risk of type Ia endoleak and endograft migration. By contrast, the aortic segment at the brachiocephalic trunk seems to be promising for performing TEVAR due to its moderate funnel morphology using an endograft of appropriate size and conformability.

Early Experience With Fenestration Modification of Castor Branched Stent-Graft for Aortic Arch Diseases

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the safety and viability of combining branched stent graft with fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in treating aortic arch lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cohort included patients presenting with aortic arch lesions who underwent treatment with a combination of branched stent graft and fenestrated TEVAR between July 2020 and November 2022. Technical success was defined as the precise deployment of the stent graft, maintenance of branch vessel patency, and the absence of type I endoleak. The secondary outcomes examined were complications and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 21 patients (average age: 61.0±14.8 years) with aortic arch lesions from 3 tertiary care hospitals. The aortic arch lesions encompassed aortic dissection (N=8), aortic aneurysm (N=8), pseudoaneurysm (N=1), intramural hematoma (N=1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (N=3). The technical success rate achieved was 95.2% (20/21). Failure in one case was due to an intraoperative type I endoleak, which was rectified with an additional stent graft placement. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (1/21). One patient suffered a stroke but responded well to medical intervention. The median hospital stay was 10.9±5.4 days. During the follow-up period, one death (4.8%) was associated with aortic complications. A type II endoleak was observed and managed with close monitoring. Two patients underwent re-interventions for retrograde type A dissection and stent migration, respectively. No occlusions were observed in the target branch arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of branched stent graft with fenestrated TEVAR emerges as a viable strategy for addressing specific lesions in the aortic arch.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using branched stent grafts with fenestrated TEVAR for treating aortic arch lesions, achieving a technical success rate of 95.2%. Compared to traditional open surgery, this innovative, minimally invasive approach reduces perioperative mortality and complications, such as stroke and spinal cord ischemia. For clinicians, it offers a viable alternative for patients unfit for open repair, particularly in complex aortic arch cases. While the initial outcomes are promising, further research is needed to assess long-term durability and risks, including stent graft migration and late endoleak, ensuring the technique's safety and efficacy over time.

Endovascular Technique for Ascending Aorta Repair Based on TEVAR and TAVI Procedures

PURPOSE

Ascending aorta (AAo) acute pathology still has an open-surgery indication with a high mortality rate associated to cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. In these cases, the endovascular aortic approach could be an excellent option. The aim of the present study is to detail an optimized technique for the endovascular treatment of AAo diseases, based on thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures.

TECHNIQUE

The procedure implies the usual preparation for TEVAR and TAVI implants. A transient pacemaker lead is necessary to deliver the prosthesis under "rapid pacing." As in the TAVI technique, a final high-support guidewire is placed at the left ventricle. The proximal landing zone is the sinotubular junction (zone 0B). Transesophageal echocardiography is essential to ensure aortic valve function and patency in coronary arteries during the delivery. To assess a potential occlusion of the brachiocephalic artery, a guidewire is positioned in the descending aorta from the axillary artery. Finally, a noncovered stent is implanted to stabilize the AAo prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

The technique presented here can standardize a safe and reproducible procedure to endovascular repair of AAo diseases. However, new devices specifically designed for the AAo could facilitate the transcatheter approach.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Ascending aorta acute pathology still has an open-surgery indication with high mortality rate associated to cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Moreover, near 30% of patients are not considered suitable for surgery because of age, critical situation or the presence of severe comorbidities. The present study provides a detailed and optimized technique for the endovascular treatment of ascending aorta disease, based on TEVAR and TAVI procedures.

Endovascular repair of ascending aortic pathologies in patients unfit for open surgery: case series and literature review

The number of vascular centers performing endovascular repair of ascending aortic disease is constantly increasing. Accordingly to the guidelines, open surgical repair remains the gold standard for these pathologies. However, approximately one quarter of patients are deemed unfit for open surgery. In this study, we describe three cases of ascending thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) performed at our center. All the patients were deemed unfit for open surgery by the aortic team. Two patients had an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm, and the third had a focal type A aortic dissection. In two cases, we used two abdominal aortic cuffs deployed from zone 0B to zone 0C, with no need for supra-aortic trunk debranching. In one case, we performed a "reverse" extrathoracic debranching, and we deployed a thoracic endograft from zone 0B to zone 2. Complications included one minor stroke and one inguinal hematoma. In one patient with an infected pseudoaneurysm, we performed ascending TEVAR as a bridge strategy for open repair. This patient developed a type Ia endoleak; however, clinical stabilization and infection control were obtained, and he was able to undergo heart surgery successfully. He underwent a second reintervention to treat superior mesenteric embolic occlusion. At 2 years of follow-up, all three patients were alive. Our preliminary experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and clinical appropriateness of ascending TEVAR using standard, commercially available endografts. However, no consensus has been reached regarding some critical aspects, such as the development of a standardized technique or the efficacy of the currently available devices. The improvements in graft design and the adoption of the "aortic team" approach could help in the near future to standardize the procedure, establish appropriate indications, and ensure good clinical outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data

OBJECTIVE

The undisputed gold standard of treatment for type A aortic dissections (TAAD) is open surgery. Anecdotal reports have assessed thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a last resort for highly selected candidates. The present study aims to evaluate endovascular outcomes in TAAD patients who are unsuitable for open surgery whilst having TEVAR-compatible aortic anatomy.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed up to 19 May 2022. Time-to-event data were reconstructed using Kaplan-Meier curves from the source literature.

RESULTS

In 20 eligible studies, 311 patients underwent TEVAR for acute, subacute, or chronic TAAD. Mean age at the time of the operation was 60.70 ± 8.00 years and 75.48% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 60.33-88.46%) of the included patients were males. Mean operative time was 169.40 ± 30.70 min. Overall, 0.44% (95% CI, 0.00-4.83%) of the cases were converted to salvage open surgery. Technical failure, stroke, and endoleaks occurred in 0.22%, 0.1%, and 8.52% of the cohort, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complication rate was 7.08% (95% CI, 1.52-14.97%), whereas late complications developed in 16.89% (95% CI, 7.75-27.88%) of the patients. One-, three-, and five-year survival rates were estimated at 87.15%, 82.52% and 82.31%, respectively. Reintervention was required in 8.38% of the cohort over a mean follow-up of 32.40 ± 24.40 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR seems to be feasible in highly selected patients with TAAD who cannot tolerate open surgery. Overcoming technical limitations and acquiring long-term data are warranted to safely define the place of endovascular treatment in the armamentarium of TAAD repair.

Detection of Endoleaks Following Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Endovascular Aortic Repair-: A Comparison of Standard and Dynamic 4D-Computed Tomography Angiography

PURPOSE

Endoleaks are a common complication after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The detection and correct classification of endoleaks is essential for the further treatment of affected patients. However, standard computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides no hemodynamic information on endoleaks, which can result in misclassification in complex cases. The aim of this study was to compare standard CTA (sCTA) with dynamic, dual-energy CTA (dCTA) for detection and classification of endoleaks following EVAR or TEVAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective evaluation compared 69 sCTA diagnostic examinations performed on 50 different patients with 89 dCTA diagnostic examinations performed on 69 different patients.

RESULTS

In total, 15.9% of sCTA examinations and 49.4% of dCTA examinations led to the detection of endoleaks. With sCTA, 20.0% of patients were diagnosed with endoleaks, while with dCTA, 37.7% of patients were diagnosed with endoleaks. With sCTA, mainly Type 1 endoleaks were detected, whereas, with dCTA, the types of detected endoleaks were more evenly distributed. In comparison with the literature, the frequencies of endoleak types detected with dCTA better reflect the natural distribution than the frequencies detected with standard CTA.

CONCLUSION

Based on the retrospective comparative evaluation, dCTA could pose a valuable supplementary diagnostic tool resulting in a more accurate and realistic detection and classification of suspected endoleaks.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm

A 74-year-old man with a history of two thoracic aortic repairs, including a modified Bentall procedure using a mechanical valve and total arch replacement, was referred to our hospital with the development of hoarseness. Computed tomography revealed an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm between the prosthetic grafts in the ascending aorta. Two aortic cuffs for abdominal aorta were deployed through the left axillary artery using a transcatheter aortic valve replacement guidewire placed at the supra-aortic mechanical valve during ventricular rapid pacing and were successfully covered with an inlet to the pseudoaneurysm on postoperative computed tomography. The postoperative course was favorable.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the proximal landing zone 0

Background

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, initially intended for thoracic aortic disease treatment, has extended its application to the proximal zone of the aorta. However, the safety and surgical outcomes of extending the proximal landing zone into the ascending aorta (zone 0) in selected cases remain unknown. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to obtain a deeper understanding of its safety, outcomes, and trends over time.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, from January, 1997 to January, 2022. Only studies involving zone 0 TEVAR were included. The retrieved data from the eligible studies included basic study characteristics, 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate, indications, comorbidities, stent grafts, techniques, and complications. Summary effect measures of the primary outcomes were obtained by logarithmically pooling the data with an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects model.

Results

Fifty-three studies with 1,013 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate of zone 0 TEVAR was 7.49%. The rates of post-operative stroke, type Ia endoleak, retrograde type A aortic dissection, and spinal cord ischemia were 8.95, 9.01, 5.72, and 4.12%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although many novel stent grafts and techniques targeting zone 0 TEVAR are being investigated, a consensus on technique and device selection in zone 0 TEVAR is yet to be established in current practice. Furthermore, the post-operative stroke rate is relatively high, while other complication rates and perioperative death rate are comparable to those of TEVAR for other aortic zones.

Dynamic Morphology of the Ascending Aorta and Its Implications for Proximal Landing in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

In this study, we assessed the dynamic segmental anatomy of the entire ascending aorta (AA), enabling the determination of a favorable proximal landing zone and appropriate aortic sizing for the most proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Patients with a non-operated AA (diameter < 40 mm) underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography (ECG-CTA) of the entire AA in the systolic and diastolic phases. For each plane of each segment, the maximum and minimum diameters in the systole and diastole phases were recorded. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare aortic size values. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (53% male; median age 82.1 years; age range 76.8−85.1). Analysis of the dynamic plane dimensions of the AA during the cardiac cycle showed significantly higher systolic values than diastolic values (p < 0.001). Analysis of the proximal AA segment showed greater distal plane values than proximal plane values (p < 0.001), showing a reversed funnel form. At the mid-ascending segment, the dynamic values did not notably differ between the distal plane and the proximal segmental plane, demonstrating a cylindrical form. At the distal segment of the AA, the proximal plane values were larger than the distal segmental plane values (p < 0.001), thus generating a funnel form. Conclusions: The entire AA showed greater systolic than diastolic aortic dimensions throughout the cardiac cycle. The mid-ascending and distal-ascending segments showed favorable forms for TEVAR using a regular cylindrical endograft design. The most proximal segment of the AA showed a pronounced conical form; therefore, a specific endograft design should be considered.

Endovascular ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm repair under image fusion guidance and transcranial Doppler monitoring

We describe a 78-year-old woman with a large ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair under intraoperative image fusion guidance and real-time transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring. TCD monitoring revealed a total of 419 microembolic signals throughout the procedure, with the majority occurring as the first stent graft crossed the ascending aorta. Two days later, she underwent endovascular repair of a graft type IA endoleak. We highlight the role of image fusion guidance and TCD monitoring in enabling successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair in an elderly woman and in identifying procedural areas of improvement to minimize stroke risk.

Endovascular Repair for Ascending Aortic Graft Side Branch Pseudoaneurysm: A Report of Two Cases

Introduction

A pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch of the prosthesis, following ascending aortic replacement, is extremely rare. Re-intervention usually involves open surgery, replacement of the ascending aorta, or ligation of the side branch. Redo surgery with an additional sternotomy carries the risk of cardiac and vascular injuries, and endovascular treatment can reduce such adverse events.

Report

This study describes the successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of two cases of pseudoaneurysms arising from the side branch after ascending aortic replacement. Case 1 involved a 79 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement and omentopexy for a ruptured tuberculous aortic aneurysm 13 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was mushroom shaped with a 30 mm protrusion. Case 2 involved an 83 year old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection 11 years ago. The pseudoaneurysm was rod shaped with a 27 mm protrusion. In both cases, the pseudoaneurysm arising from the side branch was not noted on computed tomography (CT) until one year earlier and was first identified at a routine follow up examination. The pseudoaneurysms required surgical repair because of the risk of rupture; however, TEVAR was selected considering the risks of redo surgery and the patients' ages. It was performed via a femoral artery approach without adverse events using a commercially available thoracic aortic device. Post-operative CT scan showed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm.

Discussion

Although TEVAR is usually not indicated for ascending aortic pathologies, if there is an anatomical indication and a compatible stent graft, TEVAR for the ascending aorta should be the first choice in patients who are inoperable, at high risk and undergoing redo surgery.

OUP accepted manuscript

We report the case of a 64-year-old patient who previously had an aortic valve replacement with a stentless aortic valve and an ascending aorta replacement for a DeBakey type II aortic dissection. The patient was referred to us for symptomatic aortic regurgitation related to bioprosthesis degeneration and a pseudoaneurysm at the distal anastomotic site of the vascular graft. Due to the presence of several comorbidities, the patient had a combined transapical transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implant and an ascending aorta endovascular repair.

Procedure-Associated Costs and Mid-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Zone 0 and Zone 1 Aortic Arch Repair

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of proximal aortic arch pathology provides a less-invasive treatment option for high-risk patients ineligible for open arch reconstruction. However, the fiscal impact of these techniques remains unclear. Therefore, our objective was to characterize the mid-term outcomes after Zone 0 and Zone 1 TEVAR and describe the associated technical costs, revenues, and net margins at a single tertiary medical center.

METHODS

We examined all patients who underwent TEVAR between April 2011 and August 2019 via retrospective chart review. Patients were categorized by proximal endograft extent to identify Zone 0 or Zone 1 repairs. Procedural characteristics and outcomes were described. Technical costs, revenues, and margins were obtained from the hospital finance department.

RESULTS

We identified 10 patients (6 Zone 0, 4 Zone 1) who were denied open arch reconstruction. Patients were predominantly female (n = 8; 80%) and the mean age was 72.8 ± 5.5 years. TEVAR was performed in 5 asymptomatic patients, urgently in 3 symptomatic patients, and emergently in 2 ruptured patients. TEVAR plus extra-anatomic bypass was performed in 4 patients. Another 4 patients also received parallel stent-grafting while 1 patient received a branched thoracic endograft and yet another an in-situ laser fenestration followed by branch stent grafting. Within the 30-day postoperative period, 1 patient experienced stroke and 1 patient died. Bypass and branch vessel patency were 100% through the duration of follow-up (mean 19.3 months). Mean total technical cost associated with all procedures or repair stages was $105,164 ± $59,338 while mean net technical margin was -$25,055 ± $18,746. The net technical margin was negative for 9 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of the proximal aortic arch is associated with good mid-term outcomes in patients considered too high-risk for open repair. However, reimbursement does not adequately cover treatment cost, with net technical margins being negative in nearly all cases. To remain financially sustainable, efforts should be made to both optimize aortic arch TEVAR delivery as well as advocate for reimbursement commensurate with associated costs.

A three-dimensional biomodel of type A aortic dissection for endovascular interventions

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is widely used for type B aortic dissection. However, there is no favorable stent-graft for type A aortic dissection. A significant limitation for device development is the lack of an experimental model for type A aortic dissection. We developed a novel three-dimensional biomodel of type A aortic dissection for endovascular interventions. Based on Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine data from the computed tomography image of a patient with a type A aortic dissection, a three-dimensional biomodel with a true lumen, a false lumen, and an entry tear located at the ascending aorta was created using laser stereolithography and subsequent vacuum casting. The biomodel was connected to a pulsatile mock circuit. We conducted four tests: an endurance test for clinical hemodynamics, wire insertion into the biomodel, rapid pacing, and simulation of stent-graft placement. The biomodel successfully simulated clinical hemodynamics; the target blood pressure and cardiac output were achieved. The guidewire crossed both true and false lumens via the entry tear. The pressure and flow dropped upon rapid pacing and recovered after it was stopped. This simulation biomodel detected decreased false luminal flow by stent-graft placement and detected residual leak. The three-dimensional biomodel of type A aortic dissection with a pulsatile mock circuit achieved target clinical hemodynamics, demonstrated feasibility for future use during the simulated endovascular procedure, and evaluated changes in the hemodynamics.

Endovascular repair of ascending aortic diseases with custom-made endografts

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to report the mid-term results of ascending thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a custom-made device (CMD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed at tertiary centres. Nine patients considered unfit for open surgery received elective total endovascular repair of the ascending aorta with a Relay® (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise; FL, USA) CMD: pseudoaneurysn (n = 5), localized dissection (n =3) and contained rupture (n = 1).

RESULTS

Primary clinical success was achieved in all patients with no major complications and no early conversion to open surgery. All patients were discharged home and independent: median length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-18). No patient was lost to follow-up at a median 26 months (interquartile range, 12-36). Three patients died 2, 6 and 24 months after intervention; 1 was aorta related (late aorto-atrial fistula due to infection that required open surgery). At the last follow-up available, no endoleaks, migrations, fractures or ruptures were observed in the remaining 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ascending thoracic endovascular aortic repair with Terumo Aortic CMDs was technically feasible, effective and safe in very selected lesions. CMDs showed good ascending aorta conformability with different configurations and diameters, and satisfactory mid-term durability as shown by both structural integrity and aortic lesion exclusion.

Anesthetic Considerations in Endovascular Repair of the Ascending Aorta

Since the first endovascular aortic repair in 1990, endovascular devices and the indications for their use have significantly grown. Considerable progress has been made in endovascular devices and techniques, such that endovascular repair is now considered first-line treatment for patients with descending aortic disease. However, for patients with ascending aortic disease, open surgical repair with cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic cardiac arrest was the only option until recently. Although the outcomes for open surgical repair of the ascending aorta have improved over the years, approximately 30% of patients with an emergent surgical indication, such as type A aortic dissection, are considered to be too high risk for open repair. For these patients, endovascular repair of the ascending aorta offers a life-saving procedure. The ascending aorta is regarded as the final frontier for endovascular therapy. Endovascular repair of it has posed a formidable challenge thus far, due to its unique anatomy, hemodynamic forces, and lack of an appropriate stent-graft designed specifically for the ascending aorta. Although currently there are no comprehensive data from randomized clinical trials, there are several case series and case reports that have shown favorable outcomes. Improvements in available devices soon will drive an exponential increase in the number of patients undergoing endovascular ascending aortic repair. In this review, the authors discuss multiple aspects of endovascular ascending aortic repair including the unique surgical and anesthetic considerations, the devices used, and the available outcomes data, and future directions are also explored.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular interventions for Stanford type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The standard surgical approach to Stanford type A aortic dissection is open repair. However, up to one in four patients will be declined surgery because of prohibitive risk. Patients who are treated nonoperatively have an unacceptably high mortality. Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is emerging as an alternative treatment for a select group of patients. The reported rates of technical success, mortality, stroke, and reintervention have varied. The objective of the study was to systematically report outcomes for acute type A dissections repaired using an endovascular approach.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. We performed online literature database searches through April 2020. The demographic and procedural characteristics of the individual studies were tabulated. Data on technical success, short-term mortality, stroke, and reintervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 80 cases of aortic dissection (55 acute and 25 subacute) were included in the final analysis. A wide variation was found in technique and device design across the studies. The outcomes rates were estimated at 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-26%) for mortality, 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) for technical failure, 11% (95% CI, 6%-19%) for stroke and 18% (95% CI, 9%-31%) for reintervention. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 13.9 ± 3.2.

CONCLUSION

The technique for endovascular repair of type A aortic dissection is feasible and reproducible. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for inoperable patients who otherwise would have an extremely poor prognosis. Data from clinical trials are required before the technique can be introduced into routine clinical practice.

Endovascular ascending aortic repair in type A dissection: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Up to 10% of acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients are deemed unfit for open surgical repair, exposing these patients to high mortality rates. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair has proven to be a promising alternative treatment modality in specific cases. This study presents a comprehensive overview of the current state of catheter-based interventions in the setting of primary TAAD.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted, using MEDLINE and PubMed databases according to PRISMA guidelines, updated until January 2020. Articles were selected if they reported on the endovascular repair of DeBakey Type I and II aortic dissections. The exclusion criteria were retrograde type A dissection, hybrid procedures, and combined outcome reporting of mixed aortic pathologies (e.g., pseudoaneurysm and intramural hematoma).

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles, out of which 19 were case reports and 12 case series, describing a total of 92 patients, were included. The median follow-up was 6 months for case reports and the average follow-up was 14 months for case series. Overall technical success was 95.6% and 30-day mortality of 9%. Stroke and early endoleak rates were 6% and 18%, respectively. Reintervention was required in 14 patients (15%).

CONCLUSION

This review not only demonstrates that endovascular repair in the setting of isolated TAAD is feasible with acceptable outcomes at short-term follow-up, but also underlines a lack of mid-late outcomes and reporting consistency. Studies with longer follow-up and careful consideration of patient selection are required before endovascular interventions can be widely introduced.

Hybrid zone zero debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair of ascending aortic injury after surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta remains challenging. We have reported the case of an 81-year-old woman with ascending aortic injury who underwent a life-saving hybrid repair. The patient had previously undergone extended radical mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer, which had resulted in a right thoracic wall defect and bone exposure and osteonecrosis of the sternum. Therefore, the ascending aorta was directly compressed by the sternum at the level of the brachiocephalic artery bifurcation, causing persistent bleeding from the thoracic wall. Hybrid zone 0 debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a left subclavian artery inflow was emergently performed and achieved hemostasis.

Clinical Practice Variation and Outcomes for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Repair Surgery in Maryland: Report from a Statewide Quality Initiative

Background  Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery is associated with high mortality and clinical practice remains variable among hospitals. Few studies have examined statewide practice variation.

Methods  Patients who had Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery in Maryland between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2018 were identified using the Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative (MCSQI) database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgery details, and outcomes were compared between hospitals. We also explored the impact of arterial cannulation site and brain protection technique on outcome.

Results  A total of 233 patients were included from eight hospitals during the study period. Seventy-six percent of surgeries were done in two high-volume hospitals (≥10 cases per year), while the remaining 24% were done in low-volume hospitals. Operative mortality was 12.0% and varied between 0 and 25.0% depending on the hospital. Variables that differed significantly between hospitals included patient age, the percentage of patients in shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine level, arterial cannulation site, brain protection technique, tobacco use, and intraoperative blood transfusion. The percentage of patients who underwent aortic valve repair or replacement procedures differed significantly between hospitals ( p  < 0.001), although the prevalence of moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency was not significantly different ( p  = 0.14). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, renal failure, stroke, or gastrointestinal complications between hospitals or based on arterial cannulation site (all p  > 0.05). Patients who had aortic cross-clamping or endovascualr repair had more embolic strokes when compared with patients who had hypothermic circulatory arrest ( p  = 0.03).

Conclusion  There remains considerable practice variation in Stanford Type A aortic dissection repair surgery within Maryland including some modifiable factors such as intraoperative blood transfusion, arterial cannulation site, and brain protection technique. Continued efforts are needed within MCSQI and nationally to evaluate and employ the best practices for patients having acute aortic dissection repair surgery.

Important longitudinal and circumferential pulsatile changes in zone 0 of the aorta during the cardiac cycle

OBJECTIVES

Correct stent-graft sizing is important when planning for thoracic endovascular repair in zone 0. As the movements of the aorta are constantly evolving in longitudinal and circumferential directions during the cardiac cycle, the diameter may not be the only important measurement. The aim of this study is to measure the circumferential and longitudinal pulsatile changes throughout the cardiac cycle.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients, who were evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, were selected for this retrospective study. Their electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography was analysed. We identified the area, perimeter and diameter of the thoracic aorta in zone 0 and calculated the differences between these parameters at 3 locations in zone 0. The measurements were made in multiplanar views perpendicular to the semi-automatically created centreline in both systolic and diastolic phases.

RESULTS

The mean age of our study cohort was 77 ± 11 years. The mean change between systole and diastole of the area (mm2), perimeter (mm) and diameter (mm) were compared at 3 different locations in the ascending aorta: at the sinotubular junction (0.78 mm2 vs 0.89 mm vs 1.41 mm), mid-ascending (0.72 mm2 vs 0.68 vs 0.81 mm) and proximal edge of the brachiocephalic artery (0.76 mm2 vs 0.73 mm vs 0.73 mm). The change in percentage is the smallest in the area at the sinotubular junction compared to the perimeter and diameter (2.6% vs 3.1% vs 4.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in measurement of ascending aortic diameter with cardiac cycle are larger than measurement change in the area. This is especially more pronounced in zone 0A. For more accurate information on the morphometric changes, it may be necessary to measure the area when planning for thoracic endovascular repair to maximize results. A prospective study comparing these different measurements regarding the outcomes is advised by the authors to understand the clinical implications.

Successful Endovascular Repair of an Aortobronchial Fistula due to Takayasu Arteritis

Endovascular approaches to treating a diseased ascending aorta are challenging. We report the use of an endovascular occlusion device for successful closure of a ruptured penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of an ascending aorta. A 47-year-old female patient with Takayasu arteritis complained of a worsening hemoptysis. She had a history of Bentall procedure for a sinus of Valsalva aneurysm and redo surgery for a ruptured penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer close to the distal anastomosis. She developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mediastinitis after the second procedure and required negative pressure wound therapy. Computed tomographic angiography revealed recurrence of a ruptured penetrating aortic ulcer and an aortobronchial fistula. Because of the high risk of redo sternotomy after MRSA mediastinitis, we used an endovascular occlusion device to achieve successful percutaneous closure. The patient was discharged without any complications. Postoperative computed tomography scans showed that the endovascular device was positioned without migration and that complete thrombosis of the penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer was achieved. This is the first report on endovascular repair of a ruptured penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the ascending aorta in Takayasu arteritis.

Clinical outcome of acute thoracic aortic syndrome in nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

Decision-making regarding the operability of thoracic aortic disease in nonagenarian patients remains controversial because outcomes of open surgical repair of the thoracic aorta are unclear. We investigated the surgical and nonsurgical outcomes of acute thoracic aortic syndrome treatment in nonagenarians.

METHODS

After evaluating data in our institute from April 2016 to March 2020, we included 10 nonagenarians who needed surgical intervention on the thoracic aorta via a median sternotomy for acute thoracic aortic syndrome. The mean age of the cohort was 91.9 ± 2.1 years. Five patients underwent open surgical repair of the thoracic aorta (surgical group), and 5 refused surgery (nonsurgical group). All patients in the surgical group performed activities of daily living independently, with a mean clinical frailty scale of 3.2 ± 0.4. The surgical group included 4 patients with type A aortic dissection and one with a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm. Hemiarch replacement was performed in 3 patients and total arch replacement in 2. The mean follow-up period was 17.8 ± 5.1 months.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality rates were 0% in the surgical and 80% in the nonsurgical group. The mean length of hospitalization was 28.4 ± 6.7 days in the surgical group. The 1-year survival rates were 100% in the surgical group and 20% in the nonsurgical group.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical repair for acute thoracic aortic syndrome via median sternotomy is a reasonable treatment option even in nonagenarians. Involvement of family members is important for decision-making to devise the optimal treatment strategy (surgical vs. medical).

Endo-Bentall for proximal aortic dissection: from conception to application

The endovascular treatment of pathologies of the ascending aorta has not been incorporated into routine clinical practice. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the endovascular treatment of pathologies of the ascending aorta, particularly type A aortic dissection. A thorough analysis and discussion of anatomical, physiological, clinical and technical challenges, and obstacles is performed. Conventional straight stent-grafts alone are not capable of fixing the entire complex underlying problem in the vast majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. An endovascular valve-carrying conduit consisting of a proximal transcatheter aortic valve connected to a covered stent-graft would be able to close a primary entry tear in the ascending aorta, ensure coronary perfusion, initiate true lumen expansion, treat malperfusion, treat aortic regurgitation, drain any pericardial effusion through a transapical approach, and possibly stabilize the distal aorta. Two thirds of all patients with acute aortic dissection are potential candidates for endovascular treatment, and the concept may help to significantly improve survival in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Endovascular Treatment of the Ascending Aorta: is this the Last Frontier in Aortic Surgery?

Regardless the successful treatment of the descending aorta with endovascular prosthesis, for the ascending aorta segment, because of several anatomic and physiologic issues, this technique has been considered an alternative only for high-risk or inoperable patients. Despite restricted indications, hundreds of treatments have been performed worldwide, demonstrating its safety and reproducibility if it is done in high-quality centers. Therefore, understanding patients' selection criteria and technique limitations are critical to its application.

Instabilities in Aortic Length After TEVAR and Reoperation: 12 Years of Follow-Up Imaging

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains an important minimally invasive tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aneurysm. The long-term effects of these repairs in reduction of the aneurysmal sac size as well as stability of the stented portion require study. We report the results of 12 years of radiographic follow-up.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEVAR for descending thoracic aneurysms from January 2005 to December 2017(n = 371) were evaluated for immediate postoperative and follow-up computed tomographic scans suitable for 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta (excluding those with an interim reoperation). We found 62 patients who met these criteria (median duration of radiographic follow-up, 1.8 years). Measurements were taken of centerline, greater and lesser curvatures from the most distal patent brachiocephalic vessel to the first uncovered mesenteric vessel, and between proximal and distal edges of the stented portion of the aorta.

RESULTS

All measured segments, except covered length, were significantly increasing in length for centerline, greater and lesser curvatures, with a median increase of 7.6 mm (interquartile range, 1.7-16 mm). Cox regression for mortality and reoperation found no significant correlation between these changes and mortality and a significant correlation between stented segment greater curvature increase and reoperation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in the centerline and greater curve length of the aorta were found to be occurring. This appears to be primarily driven by growth in the nonstented segments. However, changes in the outer curve length of the stented segment were associated with a greater risk of reoperation.

The Influence of Polymer Processing Methods on Polymer Film Physical Properties and Vascular Cell Responsiveness

Implantable vascular devices typically interface with blood and vascular tissues. Physical properties of device materials and coatings, independent of chemical composition, can significantly influence cell responses and implant success. Here, we analyzed the effect of various polymer processing regimes, using a single implant polymer - poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), on vascular endothelial cell (EC), smooth muscle cell (SMC), and platelet response. PCL films were formed by varying three parameters: 1) formation method - solvent casting, melt pressing or spin coating; 2) molecular weight - 50 or 100 kDa; and 3) solvent type - dichloromethane (DCM) or tetrahydrofuran (THF). We quantified the relationship of polymer processing choice to surface roughness, wettability, and bulk stiffness; and to EC adhesion, SMC adhesion, and platelet activity state (PAS). Multiple regression analysis identified which processing method signficantly impacted (F-ratio>p-value; p<0.1) polymer physical properties and vascular cell interaction. Film formation method affected PCL roughness (Rq), wettability (°), and stiffness (MPa) with spin coating resulting in the most wettable (81.8±0.7°), and stiffest (1.12±0.07 MPa; p<0.001) polymer film; however, solvent cast films were the roughest (281±66nm). Molecular weight influenced wettability, with the highest wettability on 50 kDa films (79.7±0.7°; p<0.001) and DCM solvent films (83.0±1.0°; p<0.01). The multiple regression model confidently predicted (F-ratio=9.88; p=0.005) wettability from molecular weight (p=0.002) and film formation method (p=0.03); stiffness (F-ratio=4.21; p=0.05) also fit well tofilm formation method (p=0.02). Film formation method impacted SMC adhesion and platelet activity state, but not EC adhesion, with melt press PCL promoting the highest SMC adhesion (18000±1536 SMCs; p<0.05) and PAS (5.0±0.7 %PAS). The regression model confidently fit SMC adhesion (F-ratio=3.15; p=0.09) and PAS (F-ratio=5.30; p=0.05) to polymer processing choices, specifically film formation method (p<0.03). However, only SMC adhesion had a model that fit well (F-ratio=4.13; p=0.05) to the physical properties directly, specifically roughness and wettability (p<0.04).

Volume-Outcome Relationships in Surgical and Endovascular Repair of Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

As surgical mortality decreases and endovascular utilization increases, it is unknown whether volume-outcome relationships exist in thoracic aortic dissection repair. We characterized volume-outcome relationships for surgical and endovascular management of thoracic aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients aged more than 18 years undergoing repair of thoracic aortic dissection in the United States between 2010 and 2014 were identified in seven all-payer state inpatient administrative databases. Patients were divided into groups based on type of repair: surgical repair of type A dissection (TAAD), surgical repair of type B dissection (TBAD), and endovascular repair (TEVAR). Hierarchical logistic regression models evaluated the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 13.4% (890 of 6650), highest after TAAD (463 of 2918, 15.9%), followed by TBAD (270 of 1934, 14.0%) and TEVAR (157 of 1798, 8.7%). Volume-outcome relationships for adjusted in-hospital mortality were demonstrated for TAAD and TBAD (P-trend < .001), but not TEVAR (P-trend = .11). Adjusted in-hospital mortality differed most for TAAD (fewer than 3 cases per year: 21%, 95% confidence interval, 18% to 24%; vs 11 or more cases per year: 12%, 95% confidence interval, 8% to 16%; P < .001) and TBAD (fewer than 2 cases per year: 18%, 95% confidence interval, 15% to 22%; vs 11 or more cases per year: 9%, 95% confidence interval, 5% to 12%; P < .001), whereas TEVAR did not differ between quartiles. Adjusted mortality was lower at centers with 26 or more overall annual thoracic dissection repairs, compared with any of the three lower-volume quartiles (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated lower mortality at high-volume hospitals for overall repair of aortic dissection, persisting separately for surgical repair of TAAD and TBAD, but not TEVAR. As endovascular technology advances and practice patterns consequently change, analyses should focus on understanding the balance between procedural volume, mortality, and access to care for thoracic aortic dissection.

Hybrid versus in vitro fenestration for preserving the left subclavian artery in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair with unfavorable proximal landing zone

Purpose

To compare hybrid and in vitro fenestration procedures for preserving the left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with unfavorable proximal landing zone.

Methods

Retrospective comparison of data from 49 consecutive patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during TEVAR by either hybrid or fenestration approaches from January 2015 to March 2018. Procedural duration, and 30-day rates of procedural success, mortality and complications (endoleaks, cerebral infarction, spinal cord ischemia, left arm ischemic symptoms, and delirium) were compared.

Results

For hybrid procedure ( n = 32) vs. fenestration ( n = 17) groups, which were age and gender matched: procedural success rate was 100%, with significantly longer procedural duration (248.4 ± 40.9 vs. 60.6 ± 16.8 min; t = –22.653, P = 0.000) and similar 30-day complication rate (18.8% vs. 11.8%; χ2 = 0.397, P = 0.529). At 12.7 ± 9.3 months’ follow-up, there were no cases of death, spinal cord ischemia, or other complications in either group.

Conclusions

In this retrospective, single-center comparison, both hybrid and in vitro fenestration approaches for reconstructing the left subclavian artery in TEVAR with unfavorable proximal landing zone appeared safe and effective, with shorter procedural duration for fenestration. Larger studies with longer term follow-up are warranted.

Replacing the ascending aorta in the elderly: do or do not

Advanced age is a proven independent factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality in all forms of aortic surgery and forms an important variable in most available risk scores. Improvements in selection and perioperative management of high-risk elderly cohorts have reduced the incidence of adverse outcomes. Concerns remain however in the surgical and anesthesiology community that exposing elderly frail patients to ascending aortic surgery is associated with significant risk. As with many clinical scenarios, individualization of care for each patient is of paramount importance. With advances in our understanding of perioperative and intraoperative care, age should no longer be considered in isolation as a contraindication to ascending aortic surgery.

A ruptured penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the ascending aorta: a case report of an endovascular repair with extending the length of the aortic coverage by debranching the innominate artery

Background

An endovascular approach to the management of a ruptured plaque in the ascending aorta may be an alternative to open surgery in high-risk patients. This option may become inevitable due to the number of elderly patients unfit for open cardiac surgery. There are very few stent grafts able to fit the ascending aorta and in emergency cases, most medical teams have been limited to current thoracic aortic endografts, the shortest of which measure 10 cm.

Case summary

We report a case of an endovascular repair of a ruptured penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the ascending aorta. The patient was considered for open cardiac surgery but was evaluated at a high mortality risk based on his age, his medical history, and significant calcifications on his aorta. Our vascular surgical team decided then to perform an endovascular repair with extending the length of the aortic coverage by debranching the innominate artery.

Discussion

Endovascular treatment of an acute ruptured aorta is feasible in high-risk patients with thoracic endovascular stent grafts and coverage of the innominate artery. Endovascular treatment of the ascending aorta is at its infancy and in need of further research. New stent grafts designed for the ascending aorta are in progress and should increase the numbers of interventions in the years to come.

Emergent Use of a Branched Arch Device to Treat an Ascending Aortic Rupture: A Branch-to-Branch Through-and-Through Wire Technique to Compensate for Rotation Error

Purpose: To present a novel means of overcoming a rotation error when treating a ruptured ascending aorta with a branched arch endograft. Technique: The technique is demonstrated in an 83-year-old patient with cardiac and respiratory comorbidities and a contained rupture of the ascending aorta who was referred for endovascular therapy. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed progressive pseudoaneurysm and mediastinal hematoma, but the limited landing zone required the use of an inner branched arch endograft that was designed for another patient. The device became malrotated clockwise during deployment, so cannulation of the first inner branch was done using a branch-to-branch through-and-through wire from the second inner branch. The final angiogram showed a good result, with patency of the supra-aortic vessels and exclusion of the rupture. The patient was discharged 2 weeks later without complications. The 1-month CTA was free from endoleak. The patient returned to his normal activity 3 months later. Conclusion: The use of a branched arch stent-graft for emergent repair of a ruptured ascending aorta is feasible.

Comparison of dynamic changes in aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle measured by computed tomography angiography and transthoracic echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the relationship between dynamic changes in aortic diameter and corresponding measurement methods.

METHODS

Consecutive adult (nonaneurysmal) patients being surgically treated for heart disease (mean age, 51 ± 11 years; range, 29-76 years; N = 25) were included in this study. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS). Anteroposterior diameters were measured at 1 cm above the junction of the aortic sinus, the proximal 1 cm of the innominate artery, and the midpoint of the two.

RESULTS

The average diameter of the proximal ascending aorta in systole/diastole measured by IOUS was 32.07 ± 2.03/30.27 ± 2.05 mm (paired t-test: difference, 1.80 ± 0.46 mm; P < .001). The average diameters of the proximal ascending aorta measured by nonelectrocardiography-gated CTA and TTE were 31.45 ± 1.97 mm and 29.7 ± 1.84 mm, respectively. The average diameter of the mid and distal ascending aorta in systole/diastole measured by IOUS was 32.35 ± 1.95/30.57 ± 1.94 mm (paired t-test: difference, 1.78 ± 0.44 mm; P < .001) and 32.32 ± 1.92/30.67 ± 1.90 mm (paired t-test: difference, 1.65 ± 0.42 mm; P < .001), respectively. The average diameter of the mid and distal ascending aorta measured by CTA was 31.74 ± 1.92 mm and 31.59 ± 1.96 mm, respectively. At each location, the difference in the aortic diameter between systole and diastole was statistically significant (all P values <.001; paired t-test). The minimum and maximum changes in the diameter between systole and diastole were 0.90 mm and 2.70 mm. In all, 96% (24/25) of the average diameters derived from IOUS and CTA at the three locations were within the concordance limit in systole, and 92% to 100% (23/25 to 25/25) were within the concordance limit in diastole. The average diameters derived from IOUS and TTE images of the proximal ascending aorta were within the bounds of the concordance limit 92% (23/25) of the time in systole and 100% (25/25) of the time in diastole. The average diameters derived from CTA and TTE images of the proximal ascending aorta were within the bounds of the concordance limit 88% (22/25) of the time. Pearson correlation coefficients between these groups ranged from 0.905 to 0.982 (all P values <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ascending aorta diameters measured by nonelectrocardiography-gated CTA and TTE were consistent with the IOUS measurements.

[Type A intramural hematoma of aorta: An undervalued clinical entity]

Intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta occurs after rupture of the vasa vasorum. Previously considered as a first step of acute aortic dissection, it was later defined as a separate entity that may or may not lead to arterial dissection. The debate about the most appropriate treatment for a 69-year-old patient with intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta, led to this extensive review of the literature demonstrating that intramural hematoma type A is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical support.