Inferior mesenteric artery replantation does not decrease the risk of ischemic colitis after open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Identification of Perioperative Procedural and Hemodynamic Risk Factors for Developing Colonic Ischemia after Ruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: This retrospective study evaluated perioperative and intensive care unit (ICU) variables to predict colonic ischemia (CI) after infrarenal ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) surgery. (2) Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of the patients treated for infrarenal RAAA from January 2011 to December 2020 in our hospital. (3) Results: A total of 135 (82% male) patients were admitted to ICU after treatment of infrarenal RAAA. The median age of all patients was 75 years (IQR 68-81 years). Of those, 24 (18%) patients developed CI, including 22 (92%) cases within the first three postoperative days. CI was found more often after open repair compared to endovascular treatment (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.021). Laboratory findings in the first seven PODs revealed statistically significant differences between CI and non-CI patients for serum lactate, minimum pH, serum bicarbonate, and platelet count. Norepinephrine (NE) was used in 92 (68%) patients during ICU stay. The highest daily dose of norepinephrine was administered to CI patients at POD1. Multivariable analysis revealed that NE > 64 µg/kg (RD 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001), operating time ≥ 200 min (RD 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.31, p = 0.042), and pH < 7.3 (RD 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.35, p = 0.019), significantly predicted the development of CI. A total of 23 (17%) patients died during the hospital stay, including 8 (33%) patients from the CI group and 15 (7%) from the non-CI group (p = 0.032). (4) Conclusions: CI after RAAA is a sever complication occurring most frequently within the first 3 postoperative days. Our study identified many surrogate markers associated with colonic ischemia after aortic RAAA, including norepinephrine dose > 64 µg/kg, operating time ≥ 200 min, and PH < 7.3. Future studies are needed to support these results.

Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE)

The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.

A Retroperitoneal Operative Approach is Associated with Improved Perioperative Outcomes Compared with a Transperitoneal Approach in Open Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have demonstrated advantages of a retroperitoneal approach (RP) over a transperitoneal approach (TP) during open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We compared outcomes following open repair of complex AAA (cAAA) using an RP versus a TP approach and evaluated the relative use of these approaches over time.

METHODS

We identified all patients undergoing open intact cAAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2003-2019 and created 1:1-propensity score-matched cohorts based on operative approach (RP vs. TP). The primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and approach usage over time. To create 1:1-propensity score-matched cohorts, patients were matched for demographics, comorbidities and anatomic/intraoperative characteristics including proximal clamp site and renal revascularization. Approach usage over time was determined by plotting the proportion of RP usage over time for the overall open cAAA cohort and subgroups of repairs utilizing a supraceliac cross clamp, repair with concomitant renal revascularization, and repairs in high volume centers (highest quintile: >11 cases/year).

RESULTS

Of 4,613 patients, 2,843 (62%) patients underwent open cAAA repair by TP approach and 1,770 (38%) patients by RP approach. In 1,256 matched pairs, RP approach was associated with lower risk of perioperative mortality compared with TP approach (3.9% vs. 6.8%/RR 0.57 [95%CI 0.41-0.80], p=.001). Furthermore, RP approach was associated with lower risk of cardiac complication (7.2% vs. 9.6%/RR 0.75 [95%CI 0.58-0.98]), bowel ischemia (3.1% vs. 5.4%/RR 0.56 [95%CI 0.39-0.84]) and postoperative dialysis (3.3% vs. 5.5%/RR 0.59 [95%CI 0.41-0.87]). Overall, there was a lower proportion of patients who underwent repair via an RP approach over time (-1.0%/year [-1.5 - -0.5], p<.001), and a similar trend in decrease was found within patients undergoing repair with a supraceliac clamp (-2.3%/year [-3.6 - -1.0], p<.001) and in high-volume hospitals (-2.1%/year [-3.4 - -0.8], p=.001), although no statistically significant decrease in RP usage was found in patients undergoing concomitant renal revascularization (-0.9%/year [-2.6 - 0.8], p=.28).

CONCLUSION

For open cAAA repair, an RP approach is associated with lower perioperative mortality and complications compared with a TP approach. However, relative usage of the RP approach is decreasing over time. Increased adoption of an RP approach, when appropriate, may lead to improved outcomes following open cAAA repair.

[Debate on Infrarenal AAA in Young and Fit Patients ('Fit for Open Repair'): Open Repair is Safe and Long-term Results are Better]

Endovascular aortic repair, initially developed for patients at prohibitively high risk for an open repair, has undergone significant technical evolution and refinement and has emerged as the preferred treatment option for patients with an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. However, analysis of long-term data of the randomised studies revealed inferior results with regards to survival and freedom-from-reintervention after eight years. Open aortic repair has been performed for more than seven decades and especially for the younger patients with few comorbidities, results are excellent. Potential drawbacks of open repair like incisional hernias, erectile dysfunction and quality of life can either be effectively prevented (mesh reinforcement) or actually failed to show a significant difference compared to open repair in recent studies. Therefore, meticulous assessment of patient comorbidites using validated parameters is the key element for decision-making and parameters such as young age, low comorbidity profile, large aneurysm and presence of atopic renal arteries or a dominant inferior mesenteric artery should prompt a recommendation of open repair.

Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: the importance of the individual mesenteric artery

BACKGROUND

Chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) is a vastly underdiagnosed condition that typically leads to postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. The aim of the study was to explore the involvement of various mesenteric vessels in total splanchnic blood flow (SBF) and hepatic vein oxygenation.

METHODS

Single-blinded comparative trial of 476 patients clinically suspected of CMI. Routine investigation included measurement of hepatic vein oxygen saturation, indirect measurement of the total splanchnic blood flow (SBF), using Fick's principle and the tracer [^99m Tc]Mebrofenin, before and after a meal, and digital subtraction angiography.

RESULTS

A total of 176 of the 476 patients (36%) had at least one angiographically significant stenosis (lumen reduction ≥70%). In patients with a significant one-vessel disease, the percentage having CMI according to SBF was 10% for a celiac trunk stenosis (n = 60), 50% for a superior mesenteric stenosis (n = 24) and 6% for an inferior mesenteric artery stenosis (n = 34). In patients with a significant two-vessel disease, the percentage with CMI according to SBF response was 92%, 18% and 79%, for no significant stenosis of the celiac trunk (n = 13), superior mesenteric artery (n = 17) and inferior mesenteric artery (n = 19), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with significant one- or two-vessel stenosis involving the superior mesenteric artery have a higher likelihood of CMI according to flow criteria and a greater postprandial decrease in hepatic vein saturation on average than patients with no involvement of the superior mesenteric artery.

Aneurysms and dissections - What is new in the literature of 2019/2020 - a European Society of Vascular Medicine annual review

More than 6,000 publications were found in PubMed concerning aneurysms and dissections, including those Epub ahead of print in 2019, printed in 2020. Among those publications 327 were selected and considered of particular interest.

Outcome analysis and risk factors for postoperative colonic ischaemia after aortic surgery

Purpose

Colonic ischaemia (CI) represents a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study aimed to analyse risk factors and outcome of patients suffering from postoperative CI.

Methods

Data of 1404 patients who underwent aortic surgery were retrospectively analysed regarding CI occurrence. Co-morbidities, procedural parameters, colon blood supply, procedure-related morbidity and mortality as well as survival during follow-up (FU) were compared with patients without CI using matched-pair analysis (1:3).

Results

Thirty-five patients (2.4%) with CI were identified. Cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal comorbidity were more common in CI patients. Operation time was longer (283 ± 22 vs. 188 ± 7 min, p < 0.0001) and blood loss was higher (2174 ± 396 vs. 1319 ± 108 ml, p = 0.0049) in the CI group. Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) showed a higher rate of CI compared to patients with intact AAA (5.4 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0177). CI was predominantly diagnosed by endoscopy (26/35), generally within the first 4 postoperative days (20/35). Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery, all finalised with stoma creation. Postoperative bilateral occlusion and/or relevant stenosis of hypogastric arteries were more frequent in CI patients (57.8 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.0273). In-hospital mortality was increased in the CI group (26.7 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.0001). Survival was significantly reduced in CI patients (median: 28.2 months vs. 104.1 months, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

CI after aortic surgery is associated with considerable perioperative sequelae and reduced survival. Especially in patients at risk, such as those with rAAA, complicated intraoperative course, severe cardiovascular morbidity and/or perioperative deterioration of the hypogastric perfusion, vigilant postoperative multimodal monitoring is required in order to initiate diagnosis and treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-020-01964-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pelvic radiation therapy as a potential risk factor for ischemic colitis complicating abdominal aortic reconstruction

A 78-year-old man with a 56-mm juxtarenal aneurysm and previous pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer (3 years earlier) who was disease free during follow-up received elective aortoaortic bypass suprarenal clamping through a transperitoneal approach. After the patient experienced initial abdominal pain and diarrhea, a computed tomography scan showed mild sigmoid inflammation, and the patient received conservative treatment. One month after discharge, the patient underwent urgent laparotomy and bowel and sigmoid resection for an enterocutaneous fistula. At 6-month follow-up, he has recovered, although a bowel stoma remains.

[Colonic ischemia after open and endovascular aortic surgery : Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis And Therapy]

Despite the successful establishment of endovascular techniques, colonic ischemia continues to be a serious complication of aortic surgery.The risk factors for colonic ischemia include aortic aneurysm rupture, prolonged aortic clamping, perioperative hypotension, the need for catecholamine therapy, occlusion of the hypogastric arteries and renal insufficiency.The clinical presentation of postoperative colonic ischemia is often unspecific. Classic symptoms include abdominal pain, diarrhea, peranal bleeding and rise of inflammatory parameters. A specific laboratory parameter for colonic ischemia does not exist. The diagnostic gold standard is endoscopy. Imaging methods such as sonography or computer tomography play only a supportive role. Transmural ischemia resulting in bowel wall necrosis is an indication for emergency surgery, predominantly colonic resection with creation of artificial anus.