1
|
Hamel C, Avard B, Isaac N, Jassal D, Kirkpatrick I, Leipsic J, Michaud A, Worrall J, Nguyen ET. Canadian Association of Radiologists Cardiovascular Imaging Referral Guideline. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241246425. [PMID: 38733286 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241246425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Cardiovascular Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, cardiology, and emergency medicine, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 30 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 48 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 125 recommendation statements across the 30 scenarios (27 unique scenarios as 2 scenarios point to the CAR Thoracic Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline and the acute pericarditis subscenario is included under 2 main scenarios). This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for acute chest pain syndromes, chronic chest pain, cardiovascular screening and risk stratification, pericardial syndromes, intracardiac/pericardial mass, suspected valvular disease cardiomyopathy, aorta, venous thrombosis, and peripheral vascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candyce Hamel
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Barb Avard
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Isaac
- Department of Medical Imaging, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Davinder Jassal
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University of Manitoba, Bergen Cardiac Care Centre St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Iain Kirkpatrick
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - James Worrall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Elsie T Nguyen
- University Medical Imaging Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Accarino G, De Vuono F, Accarino G, Fornino G, Puca AE, Fimiani R, Parrella V, Savarese G, Furgiuele S, Vecchione C, Galasso G, Bracale UM. Endurant Stent Graft for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Inside and Outside of the Instructions for Use for the Proximal Neck: A 14-Year, Single-Center Experience. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2589. [PMID: 38731118 PMCID: PMC11084245 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess the medium and long-term performance of the Endurant stent graft in a cohort of consecutive patients treated with this device for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) both inside and outside of the instructions for use (IFU) and to find factors influencing the outcomes. Methods: Our observational, retrospective, single-center study included all patients who consecutively underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant stent graft from February 2009 to January 2023. Patients with an AAA to treat according to current guidelines were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 inside of the IFUs and Group 2 outside of the IFUs for the proximal aortic neck. Patients were followed up after the procedure with computed angiography tomography, ultrasound examination, and interviews. Aneurysm-related mortality, procedure-related reinterventions, and type IA and III endoleaks were considered primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included aneurysmal sac variations and graft thrombosis. Results: A total of 795 patients were included, 650 in Group 1 and 145 in Group 2; 732 were males, and the mean age was 74 ± 8. Anamnestic baseline did not differ between the two groups. Neck length, width, and angulation were different between the two groups (all p < 0.001). A total of 40 patients had a ruptured AAA, while 56 were symptomatic. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 39 months, aneurysm-related mortality was less than 1%, and 82 endoleak (10.5%) were observed. Overall endoleak rate and type 1A endoleak, as well as procedure-related reintervention, were significantly more frequent in Group 2. Sac regression of at least 5 mm was observed in 65.9% of cases. AAAs larger than 60.5 mm carried a higher risk of endoleak (HR: 1.025; 95% CI: 1.013-1.37; p < 0.001) and proximal necks shorter than 13.5 mm carried a higher type 1A risk (HR: 0.890; 95% CI: 0.836-0.948; p < 0.001). Patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and taking lipid-lowering drugs had an overall more consistent sac-shrinking rate. Conclusions: The Endurant stent graft proves safe and reliable. Out-of-IFU treatment has poorer medium and long-term outcomes. Some conditions influence medium and long-term reintervention risk and sac behavior. Patients with bigger aneurysms, proximal necks shorter than 13.5 mm, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should be more carefully evaluated during follow-up. Consistent follow-up is in keeping low aneurysm-related mortality. Personalized risk profiles and peri and postoperative management strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Accarino
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy; (G.F.); (A.E.P.); (R.F.); (V.P.)
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (U.M.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Francesco De Vuono
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Giancarlo Accarino
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Giovanni Fornino
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy; (G.F.); (A.E.P.); (R.F.); (V.P.)
| | - Aniello Enrico Puca
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy; (G.F.); (A.E.P.); (R.F.); (V.P.)
| | - Rodolfo Fimiani
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy; (G.F.); (A.E.P.); (R.F.); (V.P.)
| | - Valentina Parrella
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy; (G.F.); (A.E.P.); (R.F.); (V.P.)
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Giovanni Savarese
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (U.M.B.)
| | - Sergio Furgiuele
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Struttura Ospedaliera ad Alta Specialità Mediterranea, 80122 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine Vecchione
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Gennaro Galasso
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; (F.D.V.); (G.A.); (C.V.); (G.G.)
| | - Umberto Marcello Bracale
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (U.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Girolamo AD, Ascione M, Miceli F, Mohseni A, Pranteda C, Sirignano P, Taurino M, di Marzo L, Mansour W. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Accessory Renal Artery Exclusion during Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:864. [PMID: 38732277 PMCID: PMC11083523 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accessory renal arteries (ARAs) frequently coexist with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and can influence treatment. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the ARA's exclusion effect on patients undergoing standard endovascular aneurysm repair for AAA. METHODS The study focused on medium- and long-term outcomes, including type II endoleak, aneurysmal sac changes, mortality, reoperation rates, renal function, and infarction post-operatively. RESULTS 76 patients treated with EVAR for AAA were included. One hundred and two ARAs were identified: 69 originated from the neck, 30 from the sac, and 3 from the iliac arteries. The ARA treatment was embolization in 15 patients and coverage in 72. Technical success was 100%. One-month post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed that 76 ARAs (74.51%) were excluded. Thirty-day complications included renal deterioration in 7 patients (9.21%) and a blood pressure increase in 15 (19.73%). During follow-up, 16 patients (21.05%) died, with three aneurysm-related deaths (3.94%). ARA-related type II endoleak (T2EL) was significantly associated with the ARA's origin in the aneurysmatic sac. Despite reinterventions were not significantly linked to any factor, post-operative renal infarction was correlated with an ARA diameter greater than 3 mm and ARA embolization. CONCLUSION ARAs can influence EVAR outcomes, with anatomical and procedural factors associated with T2EL and renal infarction. Further studies are needed to optimize the management of ARAs during EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Di Girolamo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (M.A.); (F.M.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Marta Ascione
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (M.A.); (F.M.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Francesca Miceli
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (M.A.); (F.M.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Alireza Mohseni
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Chiara Pranteda
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (P.S.); (M.T.)
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (P.S.); (M.T.)
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (P.S.); (M.T.)
| | - Luca di Marzo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (M.A.); (F.M.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Wassim Mansour
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (M.A.); (F.M.); (L.d.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Villa F, Mozzetta G, Esposito D, Stefano LD, Pratesi G, Pulli R, Angiletta D, Piffaretti G. Results of the Italian Collaborators for Evar Registry on Acute Kidney Injury After Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241234277. [PMID: 38409775 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241234277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the incidence and predictive factors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in a large recent, multicenter cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a multicenter, retrospective, financially unsupported physician-initiated observational cohort study. Between January 2018 and March 2021, only patients treated with elective standard EVAR for infrarenal non-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm were analyzed. Patients already on hemodialysis (HD) were excluded. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase in sCr to ≥1.5 times baseline known or presumed to have occurred within 7 days, or a urine volume of <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. Primary outcomes of interest were AKI incidence at 30 days and freedom from HD at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were freedom from severe postoperative complication, and freedom from aorta-related mortality (ARM) at 1 year. RESULTS The final cohort analyzed 526 (29.8%). There were 489 (93%) males and 37 (7%) females: the median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-81). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 86 (16.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in 8 (1.5%) patients, none was aorta-related. Complication rate was 17.1% (n=89). AKI was observed in 17 (3.2%). Renal replacement therapy was needed in 4 (0.8%). HD was transitory in 2 cases and definitive in 1. Binary logistic regression analysis identified CKD (odds ratio [OR]: 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-10.45, p<0.001), and the presence of renal artery stenosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 1.35-10.66, p=0.011) to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Estimated freedom from ARM was 94.9% at 1 year. Estimated freedom from HD rate at 1 year was 94%: This was significantly different between patients with preoperative CKD and those who did not have preoperative CKD (log-rank, p=0.042). CONCLUSION AKI after elective standard EVAR still occurs but with an acceptably low incidence rate. Preoperative CKD is the most important predictor for postoperative AKI, which was not associated with the need for HD at 1-year follow-up but with a higher propensity of mortality. CLINICAL IMPACT This "real world" experience confirm that EVAR performed with standard contrats agent protocol remains safe for acute kidney injury development. Therefore, only patients presenting with preoperative borderline or ascertained chronic kidney disease will take the most advantage from the use of carbon dioxide contrast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Villa
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Gaddiel Mozzetta
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa School of Medicine, Genoa, Italy
| | - Davide Esposito
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Florence School of Medicine, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Di Stefano
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pratesi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa School of Medicine, Genoa, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pulli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Florence School of Medicine, Florence, Italy
| | - Domenico Angiletta
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pratesi C, Esposito D, Martini R, Novali C, Zaninelli A, Annese AL, Baggi P, Bellosta R, Bianchini Massoni C, Bonardelli S, Carriero S, Cervelli R, Chisci E, Cioni R, Corvino F, DE Cobelli F, Fanelli F, Fargion AT, Femia M, Freyrie A, Gaggiano A, Gallitto E, Gennai S, Giampalma E, Giurazza F, Grego F, Guazzarotti G, Ierardi AM, Kahlberg AL, Mascia D, Mezzetto L, Michelagnoli S, Nardelli F, Niola R, Lenti M, Perrone O, Piacentino F, Piffaretti G, Pulli R, Puntel G, Puppini G, Rossato D, Rossi M, Silingardi R, Sirignano P, Squizzato F, Tipaldi MA, Venturini M, Veraldi GF, Vizzuso A, Allievi S, Attisani L, Fino G, Ghirardini F, Manzo P, Migliari M, Steidler S, Miele V, Taurino M, Orso M, Cariati M. Guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment and management of visceral and renal arteries aneurysms: a joint assessment by the Italian Societies of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE) and Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2024; 65:49-63. [PMID: 38037721 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12809-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
The objective of these Guidelines is to provide recommendations for the classification, indication, treatment and management of patients suffering from aneurysmal pathology of the visceral and renal arteries. The methodology applied was the GRADE-SIGN version, and followed the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist. Clinical questions, structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) model, were formulated, and systematic literature reviews were carried out according to them. Selected articles were evaluated through specific methodological checklists. Considered Judgments were compiled for each clinical question in which the characteristics of the body of available evidence were evaluated in order to establish recommendations. Overall, 79 clinical practice recommendations were proposed. Indications for treatment and therapeutic options were discussed for each arterial district, as well as follow-up and medical management, in both candidate patients for conservative therapy and patients who underwent treatment. The recommendations provided by these guidelines simplify and improve decision-making processes and diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of patients with visceral and renal arteries aneurysms. Their widespread use is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Pratesi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Esposito
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | - Romeo Martini
- Department of Angiology, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Claudio Novali
- Department of Vascular Surgery, GVM Maria Pia Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Antonio L Annese
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Baggi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Serena Carriero
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Cervelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emiliano Chisci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Cioni
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Corvino
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco DE Cobelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fanelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Aaron T Fargion
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Femia
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Gaggiano
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Gennai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Emanuela Giampalma
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Francesco Giurazza
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Franco Grego
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giorgia Guazzarotti
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna M Ierardi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Mascia
- Department of Vascular Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Floriana Nardelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaella Niola
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Lenti
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Orsola Perrone
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Filippo Piacentino
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Raffaele Pulli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Gino Puntel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Puppini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Denis Rossato
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marcello A Tipaldi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Gian F Veraldi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Vizzuso
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Sara Allievi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Attisani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Fino
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Paola Manzo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Mattia Migliari
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Stephanie Steidler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cariati
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perini P, Gargiulo M, Silingardi R, Bonardelli S, Bellosta R, Piffaretti G, Michelagnoli S, Ferrari M, Turicchia GU, Freyrie A, Fornasari A, Mariani E, Faggioli G, Spath P, Migliari M, Gennai S, Paro B, Baggi P, Attisani L, Pegorer M, Franchin M, Mauri F, Chisci E, Troisi N, Paciaroni E, Fanelli M. Twenty-Five Year Multicentre Experience of Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Endografts. Angiology 2023:33197231206430. [PMID: 37820380 DOI: 10.1177/00033197231206430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
We report a multicenter experience of open conversions (OC) for aortic endograft infections (AEI). We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent OC for AEI after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), from 1997 to 2021 in 12 Italian centers. The endpoints were as follows: mortality (30-days, in-hospital), major postoperative complications. Follow-up data included: survival, aortic-related complications, infection persistence or reoccurrence. Fifty-eight patients (mean age: 73.8 ± 6.6 years) were included. Median time from EVAR to OC was 14 months (interquartile range 7-45). Thirty-five patients (60.3%) were symptomatic at presentation. Aortic reconstruction was anatomic in 32 patients (55.2%), extra-anatomic in 26 (44.8%). Thirty-day mortality was 31% (18/58). Six additional patients died after 30 days during the same hospitalization (in-hospital mortality: 41.4%). Most common post-operative complications included respiratory failure (38.6%) and renal insufficiency (35.1%). During 28.1 ± 4 months follow-up, 4 aneurysm-related deaths were recorded. Infection re-occurred in 29.4% of the patients. Estimated survival was 50% at 1 year, and 30% at 5 years, and was significantly lower for patients who underwent extra-anatomic reconstructions (37 vs 61% at 1 year, 16 vs 45% at 5 years; log-rank P = .021). OC for AEI is associated with high early mortality. The poor mid-term survival is influenced by aortic complications and infection re-occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Perini
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonardelli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Stefano Michelagnoli
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, USL Toscana Centro, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Ferrari
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Freyrie
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Anna Fornasari
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Erica Mariani
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - GianLuca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spath
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mattia Migliari
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Gennai
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Paro
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Baggi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Attisani
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Pegorer
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Franchin
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesca Mauri
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Emiliano Chisci
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, USL Toscana Centro, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Troisi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Paciaroni
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Mara Fanelli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Attisani L, Villa F, Bellosta R, Luzzani L, Pegorer MA, Fontana F, Piacentino F, Jubouri M, Bashir M, Piffaretti G, Franchin M. Outcomes and Economic Impact of Hypogastric Artery Management During Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aorto-Iliac Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 96:59-70. [PMID: 37263413 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze clinical outcomes and perform a macro-costing evaluation of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for aorto-iliac aneurysms. METHODS This is a retrospective, financially unsupported, physician-initiated observational cohort study. Patients with iliac artery involvement treated with EVAR between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2021 were identified. Inclusion criteria were intact aneurysm, elective EVAR with at least 1 hypogastric artery (HA) treatment, use of bifurcated endograft (EG), and at least 6 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), freedom from EVAR-related reintervention, and overall EVAR(procedure)-related costs. RESULTS We studied 122 (9.1%) patients: 119 (97.5%) were male and 3 (2.5%) females. Median age of patients was 76 years (range, 68.75-81). Overall, 107 (87.7%) patients had both HAs preserved according to following strategy: 45 (36.9%) with flared limbs, 13 (10.6%) with bilateral branched device, and 49 (40.2%) with a combination of flared limb on 1 side and branched device on the contralateral side. Bilateral overstenting was performed in 15 (12.3%) patients. Estimated overall survival was not different between groups of EVAR (Log-rank, P = 0.561). There was only 1 (0.8%) ARM ascertained during the follow-up. Estimated freedom from EVAR-related reintervention was not different among groups (Log-rank, P = 0.464). During the follow-up, 9 (7.4%) patients developed buttock claudication (Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) grade 1, n = 4, SVS grade 2, n = 5), more frequently in HA overstenting (hazard ratio (HR): 3.6; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.96-13.5, P = 0.058). When all cots were included, branched EVAR still carried the highest burden (P = 0.001) in comparison with the mixed subgroup, the overstenting subgroup, and the flared limbs subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Early mortality and pelvic ischemic syndromes rate were acceptably low in all techniques. Hypogastric artery preservation showed lower complication rate in comparison with HA overstenting which, however, appears to be safe an effective for option with similar overall costs for patients who are not candidates for HA preservation based on aortic anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Attisani
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Villa
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Luzzani
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Alberto Pegorer
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Fontana
- Interventional Radiology - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Filippo Piacentino
- Interventional Radiology - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education & Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy.
| | - Marco Franchin
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery of the ASST Settelaghi University Teaching Hospital, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lauri C, Signore A, Campagna G, Aloisi F, Taurino M, Sirignano P. [ 18F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030409. [PMID: 36766514 PMCID: PMC9914612 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: After endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), an increased [18F]FDG uptake may be observed at PET/CT, being common to both vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Increased non-specific metabolic activity, due to foreign body reaction, can persist for several years after surgery, thus complicating the interpretation of PET/CT studies. In this paper, we aimed to assess [18F]FDG distribution at different time-points after the implant of abdominal Endurant® endografts in patients without suspicion of infection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated [18F]FDG/CT in 16 oncological patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with Endurant® grafts. Patients had no clinical suspicion of infection and were followed up for at least 24 months after scan. [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were interpreted using both visual and semi-quantitative analyses. Results: The time between the EVAR procedure and [18F]FDG PET/CT ranged between 1 and 36 months. All grafts showed mild and diffuse [18F]FDG uptake without a focal pattern. Mean values of SUVmax were 2.63 ± 0.48 (95% CI 2.38-2.88); for SUVmean 1.90 ± 0.33 (95% CI 1.72-2.08); for T/B ratios 1.43 ± 0.41 (95% CI 1.21-1.65). SUVmax and SUVmean were not correlated to the time elapsed from the procedure, but we observed a declining trend in T/B ratio over time. Conclusions: Endovascular implant of Endurant® grafts does not cause a significant inflammatory reaction. The evidence of faint and diffuse [18F]FDG uptake along the graft can reliably exclude an infection, even in early post-procedural phases. Therefore, in patients with a low probability of VGEI, [18F]FDG PET/CT can also be performed immediately after EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lauri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Giuseppe Campagna
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Aloisi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
MOZZETTA G, DI DOMENICO R, MAURI F, PRATESI C, PULLI R, PRATESI G, TOZZI M, PIFFARETTI G. Outcomes and acute kidney injury following open aortic surgery with suprarenal clamping. Ital J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.22.01560-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
10
|
MARIANI E, BRAMUCCI A, SUMA S, FORNASARI A, CATASTA A, GAIBAZZI N, PERINI P, FREYRIE A. Influence of stent-graft fabrics on aortic stiffness after EVAR: preliminary results of a prospective cohort-study. Ital J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.22.01564-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
11
|
MELANI C, BASTIANON M, MOZZETTA G, DI GREGORIO S, DI BARTOLO M, CAPONE A, PRATESI C, PULLI R, MAURI F, PIFFARETTI G, PALERMO D, ANGILETTA D, PRATESI G. Multicenter real-life study on access-related outcomes after EVAR: percutaneous is the way. Ital J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.22.01559-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
12
|
Serafini FL, Delli Pizzi A, Simeone P, Giammarino A, Mannetta C, Villani M, Izzi J, Buca D, Catitti G, Chiacchiaretta P, Trebeschi S, Miscia S, Caulo M, Lanuti P. Circulating Extracellular Vesicles: Their Role in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Undergoing EndoVascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232416015. [PMID: 36555653 PMCID: PMC9782915 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a frequent aortic disease. If the diameter of the aorta is larger than 5 cm, an open surgical repair (OSR) or an endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) are recommended. To prevent possible complications (i.e., endoleaks), EVAR-treated patients need to be monitored for 5 years following the intervention, using computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, this radiological method involves high radiation exposure in terms of CTA/year. In such a context, the study of peripheral-blood-circulating extracellular vesicles (pbcEVs) has great potential to identify biomarkers for EVAR complications. We analyzed several phenotypes of pbcEVs using polychromatic flow cytometry in 22 patients with AAA eligible for EVAR. From each enrolled patient, peripheral blood samples were collected at AAA diagnosis, and after 1, 6, and 12 months following EVAR implantation, i.e. during the diagnostic follow-up protocol. Patients developing an endoleak displayed a significant decrease in activated-platelet-derived EVs between the baseline condition and 6 months after EVAR intervention. Furthermore, we also observed, that 1 month after EVAR implantation, patients developing an endoleak showed higher concentrations of activated-endothelial-derived EVs than patients who did not develop one, suggesting their great potential as a noninvasive and specific biomarker for early identification of EVAR complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lorenzo Serafini
- Unit of Radiology, “SS. Annunziata” Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Andrea Delli Pizzi
- Unit of Radiology, “SS. Annunziata” Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.D.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Pasquale Simeone
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.D.P.); (P.S.)
| | | | - Cristian Mannetta
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, “SS. Annunziata” Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Michela Villani
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Jacopo Izzi
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Davide Buca
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giulia Catitti
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Piero Chiacchiaretta
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Stefano Trebeschi
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiano Miscia
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Massimo Caulo
- Unit of Radiology, “SS. Annunziata” Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Paola Lanuti
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technologies (CAST), University “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Perini P, Gargiulo M, Silingardi R, Bonardelli S, Bellosta R, Franchin M, Michelagnoli S, Ferrari M, Turicchia GU, Freyrie A. Occult endoleaks revealed during open conversions after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in a multicenter experience. INT ANGIOL 2022; 41:476-482. [PMID: 36121171 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.22.04921-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An occult endoleak (OE) may be the underlying cause of aneurysm sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study is to describe intraoperative findings of OE during surgical endograft explantations. METHODS This is a retrospective, multicenter analysis of all open conversions (OC) after EVAR from 1997 to 2020 in 12 vascular centers. We excluded patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endograft infection, endograft thrombosis, and thoracic-EVAR. An OE was defined as an endoleak revealed during OC not shown on preoperative imaging, which was likely the real cause for sac enlargement. We reported the number of OE, and we described the type of OE in relation to the initial alleged or associated endoleak. A separate analysis of patients with an initial diagnosis of endotension was also performed. RESULTS An OE was found in 32/255 patients (12.5%). In the 78.1% of the cases (25/32) a type II endoleak hid a type I or III endoleak. Endotension was the initial diagnosis of 26/255 patients (10.2%). In 4/26 cases (15.4%), a type I or II OE was revealed. In 5/26 cases (19.2%) an endograft infection was found intraoperatively. In 2/26 cases we found an angiosarcoma. Fifteen cases of endotension (57.7%) remained unexplained. CONCLUSIONS OE represent a not negligible cause of EVAR failure. A type II endoleak associated with sac enlargement may actually conceal a higher-flow endoleak. In most of the cases, the initial diagnosis of endotension remains unexplained. However, endotension sometimes conceals severe underlying pathologies such as infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Perini
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy - .,Unit of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy -
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonardelli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Franchin
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Stefano Michelagnoli
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, USL Toscana Centro, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Ferrari
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giorgio U Turicchia
- AUSL Romagna, Department of Vascular Surgery, Cesena Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sirignano P, Ceruti S, Aloisi F, Sirignano A, Picozzi M, Taurino M. Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion. J Clin Med 2022; 11:4460. [PMID: 35956076 PMCID: PMC9369586 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an accepted alternative to open repair (OR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) despite “hostile” anatomies that may reduce its effectiveness. Guidelines suggest refraining from EVAR in such circumstances, but in clinical practice, up to 44% of EVAR procedures are performed using stent grafts outside their instruction for use (IFU), with acceptable outcomes. Starting from this “inconsistency” between clinical practice and guidelines, the aim of this contribution is to report the technical results of the use of EVAR in challenging anatomies as well as the ethical aspects to identify the criteria by which the “best interest” of the patient can be set. Materials and Methods: A literature review on currently available evidence on standard EVAR using commercially available endografts in patients with hostile aortic neck anatomies was conducted. Medline using the PubMed interface and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 6 May 2021, considering the following outcomes: technical success; need for additional procedures; conversion to OR; reintervention; migration; the presence of type I endoleaks; AAA-related mortality rate. Results: A total of 52 publications were selected by the investigators for a detailed review. All studies were either prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting the immediate, 30-day, and/or follow-up outcomes of standard EVAR procedures in patients with challenging neck anatomies. No randomized trials were identified. Fourteen different endo-grafts systems were used in the selected studies. A total of 45 studies reported a technical success rate ranging from 93 to 100%, and 42 the need for additional procedures (mean value of 9.04%). Results at 30 days: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 37 studies with a mean value of 2.65%; 31 studies reported a null migration rate and 32 a null conversion rate to OR; in 31 of the 35 studies that reported AAA-related mortality, the incidence was null. Mid-term follow-up: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 48 studies with a mean value of 6.65%; 30 studies reported a null migration rate, 33 a null conversion rate to OR, and 28 of the 45 studies reported that the AAA-related mortality incidence was null. Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, EVAR appears to be a safe and effective procedure—and therefore recommendable—even in the presence of hostile anatomies, in patients deemed unfit for OR. However, in order to identify and pursue the patient’s best interest, particular attention must be paid to the management of the patient’s informed consent process, which—in addition to being an essential ethical-legal requirement to legitimize the medical act—ensures that clinical data can be integrated with the patient’s personal preferences and background, beyond the therapeutic potential of the proposed procedures and what is generically stated in the guidelines.
Collapse
|