The Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines define the optimal care of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Open Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown a trend supporting endovascular revascularization (ER) in the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). However, few studies have compared the cost effectiveness of ER and open revascularization (OR) for this indication. The purpose of this study is to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing open versus ER for CMI.

METHODS

We built a Markov model with Monte Carlo microsimulation using transition probabilities and utilities from existing literature for CMI patients undergoing OR versus ER. Costs were derived from the hospital perspective using the 2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. The model randomized 20,000 patients to either OR or ER and allowed for 1 subsequent reintervention with 3 other intervening health states: alive, alive with complications, and dead. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were analyzed over a 5-year period. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to study the impact of parameter variability on cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

OR cost $4,532 for 1.03 QALYs while ER cost $5,092 for 1.21 QALYs, leading to an ICER of $3,037 per QALY gained in the ER arm. This ICER was less than our willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that our model was most sensitive to costs, mortality, and patency rates after OR and ER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated ER would be considered cost effective 99% of iterations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that while 5-year costs for ER were greater than OR, ER afforded greater QALYs than OR. Although ER is associated with lower long-term patency and higher rates of reintervention, it appears to be more cost effective than OR for the treatment of CMI.

Development of a Novel Scoring Model to Estimate the Severity Grade of Mesenteric Artery Stenosis

Objective: This study aimed to derive a new scoring model from estimating the severity grade of mesenteric artery stenosis. We sought to analyze the relationship between the new scoring model and the development, treatment, and mortality of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Methods: This retrospective study included 242 patients (128 (53%) women and 114 (47%) men) with suspected CMI from January 2011 to December 2020. A weighted sum six-point score (CSI-score; the celiac artery is abbreviated by “C”, superior mesenteric artery by “S”, and inferior mesenteric artery by “I”) based on the number of affected vessels and the extent and grade of the stenosis or occlusion of the involved visceral arteries was derived by maximizing the area under the ROC curve. The calculated CSI-score ranged from 0 to 22. The patients were divided according to the best cut-off point into low-score (CSI-score < 8) and high-score (CSI-score ≥ 8) groups. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the CSI-score was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82−0.91). The best cut-off point of “8” represented the highest value of Youden’s index (0.58) with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 72%. The cohort was divided according to the cut-off point into a low-score group (n = 100 patients, 41%) and high-score group (n = 142 patients, 59%) and according to the clinical presentation into a CMI group (n = 109 patients, 45%) and non-CMI group (n = 133 patients, 55%). The median CSI-score for all patients was 10 (range: 0 -22). High-scoring patients showed statistically significant higher rates of coronary artery disease (54% vs. 36%, p = 0.007), chronic renal insufficiency (50% vs. 30%, p = 0.002), and peripheral arterial disease (57% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). A total of 109 (45%) patients underwent invasive treatment of the visceral arteries and were more often in the high-score group (69% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Of those, 79 (72%) patients underwent primary endovascular treatment, and 44 (40%) patients underwent primary open surgery or open conversion after endovascular treatment. Sixteen (7%) patients died during the follow-up, with a statistically significant difference between high- and low-scoring patients (9% vs. 0%, p = 0.008). The score stratification showed that the percentage of patients treated with endovascular and open surgical methods, the recurrence of the stenosis or failure of the endovascular treatment, the need for a bypass procedure, and the mortality rates significantly increased in the subgroups. The CSI-score demonstrated an excellent ability to discriminate between patients who needed treatment and those who did not, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82−0.91). Additionally, the CSI-score’s ability to predict the patients’ mortality was moderate, with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62−0.83). Conclusions: The new scoring model can estimate the severity grade of the stenosis of the mesenteric arteries. Our study showed a strong association of the score with the presence of chronic mesenteric ischemia, the need for treatment, the need for open surgery, and mortality.

Two Decades of Experience With Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia and Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome in a Tertiary Referral Centre: A Parallel Longitudinal Comparative Study

Background

Chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) and median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) have similar clinical presentations with surgical intervention as the mainstay of treatment. However, surgical response varies and is unpredictable. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the technical and clinical success rates of selective revascularisation in older patients with CMI and younger patients with MALS undergoing arcuate ligament decompression with celiac sympathectomy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre longitudinal comparative study of all the patients who underwent surgery for symptoms of CMI and MALS from December 2002 to 2020 at our tertiary referral vascular centre. Our primary outcome was symptom-free survival post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, technical success, and all-cause mortality at 17 years.

Results

We operated on 28 patients; 17 patients with CMI (revascularisations with bypass) and 11 with MALS (decompression and celiac sympathectomy). All (100%) patients had technical success. There was no perioperative mortality. All the MALS patients had symptom-free survival following the procedure throughout follow-up. In contrast, three patients with CMI complained of recurring abdominal pain even after one year of the surgery. However, there was no further weight loss and none of them required any intervention.

Conclusion

Stratified management of CMI with revascularisation and open surgical decompression with celiac sympathectomy in MALS are effective treatments with favourable long-term outcomes.

Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular and hybrid methods are being increasingly used to treat mesenteric ischemia. However, long-term outcomes and risk of symptom recurrence remain unknown. The objective of this study was to define predictors of post-operative morbidity, mortality, and patency loss in acute (AMI) or chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

METHODS

Inpatient and follow-up records for all patients who underwent revascularization for AMI and CMI from 2010 to 2020 at a multicenter hospital system were reviewed. Patency and mortality were evaluated with Cox regression, visualized with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared using log rank testing. Patency was further evaluated with Fine-Gray regression utilizing death as a competing risk. Post-operative major adverse events (MAE) and 30-day mortality were evaluated with logistic regression.

RESULTS

407 patients were included; 148 AMI and 259 CMI. In AMI, 30-day mortality was 31%. Open surgery was associated with lower rates of bowel resection (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13, 0.61). Etiology of AMI also did not change outcomes (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.77, 2.19). Adjusted analyses indicates that a history of diabetes (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.37, 5.61) and sepsis on presentation (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.18, 4.58) were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day MAE. In CMI, open surgery and CKD were associated with higher MAE (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.14, 8.05; OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.31, 4.31) while CKD (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.10, 8.37) and inpatient status prior to revascularization (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.01, 7.61) were associated with increased 30-day mortality. In CMI, patients in the endovascular cohort had higher rates of symptom recurrence (29% vs. 13%) with faster onset (endovascular 64 days vs. bypass 338 days).

CONCLUSIONS

AMI remains a morbid disease despite evolving revascularization techniques. An open approach should remain the gold standard as it reduces likelihood of bowel resection. In CMI, endovascular interventions have improved post-operative morbidity but result in early symptom recurrence and re-interventions. An endovascular-first approach should be standard in CMI with close surveillance.