Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Carries a Higher Risk of Headache after Carotid Endarterectomy

Post-Carotid Artery Stenting Hyperperfusion Syndrome in a Hypotensive Patient: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a serious post-procedural complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The pathophysiological mechanisms of CHS in the absence of arterial hypertension (AH) remain only partially understood. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using the terms »cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome«, »hypotension«, »hyperperfusion«, »stroke«, »intracranial hemorrhages«, »risk factors«, »carotid revascularization«, »carotid stenting«, »carotid endarterectomy«, »blood-brain barrier«, »endothelium«, »contrast encephalopathy«, and combinations. We present a case of a normotensive female patient who developed CHS post-CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis while being hypotensive with complete recovery. We identified 393 papers, among which 65 were deemed relevant to the topic. The weighted average prevalence of CHS after CAS is 1.2% [0.0-37.7%] with that of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being 0.51% [0-9.3%]. Recently symptomatic carotid stenosis or contralateral carotid revascularization, urgent intervention, acute carotid occlusion, contralateral ≥70% stenosis, and the presence of leptomeningeal collaterals were associated with CHS. A prolonged hemodynamic instability after CAS conveys a higher risk for CHS. However, none of the articles mentioned isolated hypotension as a risk factor for CHS. Whereas mortality after ICH post-CAS ranges from 40 to 75%, in the absence of ICH, CHS generally carries a good prognosis. AH is not obligatory in CHS development. Even though impaired cerebral autoregulation and post-revascularization changes in cerebral hemodynamics seem to play a pivotal role in CHS pathophysiology, our case highlights the complexity of CHS, involving factors like endothelial dysfunction and sudden reperfusion. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and management approaches for this condition.

Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure that can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, controversy still exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for CEA.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of different techniques.

METHODS

Data on baseline characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative complications from patients who underwent CEA at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 262 CEA patients included in study, with a total of 265 CEA operations. The mean age of 69.95 ± 7.29 (range, 44-89) years. 65 (24.5%) patients underwent cCEA, 94 (35.5%) underwent pCEA, and 106 (40.0%) underwent eCEA. The use of shunt (1.9%) and the mean operation time were lower in eCEA group (P < 0.05). eCEA was also associated with a lower incidence of postoperative hypotension, whereas pCEA was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative hypertension (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical baseline characteristics, occurrence of perioperative complications, and survival whether restenosis-free, asymptomatic or overall.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that all three surgical methods are equally safe for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis and are effective in preventing stroke.

Application of laser speckle flowgraphy to evaluate cerebral perfusion after carotid endarterectomy

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is devastating, and postoperative monitoring of cerebral perfusion is essential to prevent CHS. We report two cases of successful measurement of ocular blood flow using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) for bedside assessment of the changes in cerebral perfusion after CEA. An 18.7% (case 1) and 47.7% (case 2) increase in ocular blood flow were measured postoperatively using LSFG compared with the baseline. LSFG might be applicable to evaluate cerebral perfusion after CEA.

Correlation between Carotid Stenosis Degree and Blood Pressure Variability in Patients with Carotid Stenosis

Background

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most serious diseases that endanger human health in contemporary times. It is a frequently occurring and common disease of the middle-aged and elderly people. Its incidence is increasing year by year, bringing a heavy economic burden to society and families. Whether there is a relationship between the degree of carotid artery stenosis and blood pressure variability is less studied.

Aims

To investigate the correlation between the degree of carotid stenosis and blood pressure variability in patients with carotid stenosis.

Materials and Methods

A total of 200 patients with carotid artery stenosis who were treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected as the subjects of prospective study and were divided into mild stenosis according to the degree of carotid stenosis (carotid artery stenosis rate was 0-50%), moderate stenosis (carotid artery stenosis rate was between 50% and 70%), severe stenosis (carotid artery stenosis rate≧70%), and the control group with 50 cases each. The correlations between the hemodynamics, the degree of carotid artery stenosis, and blood pressure variability in patients with carotid artery stenosis were analyzed.

Results

The levels of 24hSSD, 24hDSD, dSSD, dDSD, and nSSD in the mild stenosis group and moderate stenosis group were significantly higher than those in the control group. In the stenosis group, the levels of 24hSSD, 24hDSD, dSSD, dDSD, and nSSD in the severe stenosis group were significantly higher than those in the moderate stenosis group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The levels of PSV, EDV, and MV in the mild stenosis group and moderate stenosis group were lower than those in the control group, while the PI and RI indexes were higher than those in the control group. PI and RI levels were significantly higher than those in the mild stenosis group and moderate stenosis group (P < 0.05). Logistic analysis showed that EDV (P = 0.001, OR = 2.245, 95%CI = 1.638 ~ 3.078), SSD (P = 0.014, OR = 0.725, 95%CI = 0.528 ~ 0.996), and PSV (P = 0.001, OR = 1.970, 95%CI = 1.300 ~ 2.990) were closely related to the degree of carotid artery stenosis.

Conclusion

Hemodynamics and blood pressure variability are related to the severity of carotid stenosis, which provides a reference and basis for clinical treatment of carotid stenosis.