A systematic review and meta-analysis on early mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in females in urgent and elective setting

Sex Stratified Outcome Differences Between Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate if benefits in patient outcomes conferred by endovascular repair compared to open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA) are maintained across genders. We undertook a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between open repair and fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) utilizing the Cook Zenith Fenestrated (ZFEN) graft for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry, including patients who underwent open repair or ZFEN for cAAA between 2011 and 2022. The study population stratified by sex contained 1,697 males and 663 females. Perioperative outcomes such as mortality, complications, and reoperation rates were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and logistic regression to adjust for confounding indications for surgery.

RESULTS

Among males, those undergoing ZFEN had significantly lower odds of major complications (14% vs. 28%, aOR 0.43, p<.001), reoperation (6.0% vs. 12%, aOR 0.46, p=.03), and major respiratory complications (5.5% vs. 12%, aOR 0.42, p=.02) compared to open repair. In females, the trend towards reduced major complications with ZFEN (19% vs. 31%, aOR 0.50, p=.06) did not reach statistical significance. When comparing males to females undergoing open repair, males had 6.7 times higher odds of myocardial infarction, and 16 times higher odds of wound complications compared to females. Conversely, females undergoing ZFEN had higher odds of reoperation compared to males (12% vs. 4.1%, aOR 0.13, p=.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights significant sex-specific differences in outcomes following both ZFEN and open repair for cAAA. ZFEN offers notable advantages in reducing complications for male patients, while its benefits are less pronounced in females. These findings underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for female patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.

Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Outcomes in Female Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Data on females managed with fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic arch repair (FB-Arch) are limited. This study aimed to present the 30 day and follow up outcomes of FB-Arch in female patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis (1 January 2011 to 31 March 2024) among four European aortic centres was conducted according to STROBE guidelines. Consecutive female patients managed with custom made FB-Arch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) were eligible. Primary outcomes were technical success and death and stroke at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed for follow up outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 148 females (mean age 71.8 ± 3.5 years; mean aortic diameter 61.9 ± 4.2 mm; 14.2% urgent; 5.4% ruptures). The aortic dissection rate was 38.5% (35.8% chronic; 2.7% acute). Distal FB-Arch was performed in 23%. B-Arch was used in 68.9% and F-Arch in 27.7%, while 3.4% were managed with a left subclavian artery branch device. The non-native proximal aortic landing (nNPAL) rate was 60.1%. Technical success was 95.9%. The 30 day mortality rate was 8.1%, with respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 - 0.50; p < .001) and pericardial effusion (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.82; p < .001) being independently related. The stroke rate was 10.1% (6.1% major; all ischaemic), with peripheral arterial disease as a predictor (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.39; p = .020), and nNPAL (OR -0.22, 95% CI -0.26 - -0.02; p = .030) and aortic dissection (OR -0.19, 95% CI -0.24 - -0.001; p = .040) related to lower stroke rates. Urgent repair was not related to adverse events. The spinal cord ischaemia rate was 3.4%. At 48 months (mean follow up 20.6 ± 9.4 months), survival was 79.5% (95% CI 74.7 - 84.3%), with stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 5.3, 95% CI 4.8 - 5.8; p = .002) and congestive heart failure (HR 6.1, 95% CI 5.5 - 6.6; p = .003) being related to lower survival. Freedom from unscheduled re-interventions was 53.9% (95% CI 44.5 - 63.3%) at 48 months.

CONCLUSION

Female patients managed with FB-Arch presented an acceptable 30 day mortality rate. nNPAL and aortic dissection were independently related to lower stroke risk. Unscheduled re-interventions affected almost half of cases during follow up.

Cross-sectional, multicenter study comparing sex differences in patients undergoing endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from the São Paulo State University Provincial Hospitals Registry (RHEUNI)

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are 4-6 times more frequent among men than among women, but prognosis tends to be worse in women.

Objective

To compare endovascular procedures to repair infrarenal AAA in men and women, using data from a prospective registry.

Methods

This registry collected data from five university hospitals in the state of São Paulo (Brazil) from 2012 to 2022. A cross-sectional study was conducted compiling demographic data, anatomic variables (aneurysm diameter, short neck, angulated neck, calcified neck, or thrombosed neck; distal neck < 1.5 cm, and tortuous, abnormal iliac arteries), complications (leaks, conversions, and patency or stenosis of branches) and renal failure and mortality at 30 days. The chi-square test and Student's t test were applied with a 5% significance level. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (process 4040-2011).

Results

A total of 152 (15.9%) of the patients were women and 799 (84.0%) were men (p < 0.05). The majority were white (80.2% of the women and 87.4% of the men). Diabetes and hypertension were significantly more frequent among the women. The most prevalent shape was fusiform, particularly among the women (95.39% vs. 89.86% among men). Mean diameter was smaller among the women (5.96 cm vs. 6.49 cm; p = 0.0056). The iliac arteries were less often involved among the women (89.40% vs. 73.58%; p = 0.00001). Blood loss was greater in the men (321.40 ml vs. 168.84 ml among the women; p < 0.05). Operative mortality was similar in both sexes, but obstructions were more frequent among the women (15.2% vs. 13.51%; p = 0.017296).

Conclusions

Aneurysmal diameter was smaller and obstructive complications were more frequent among women.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Approaches for Managing Aortic Pathologies: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Since thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are increasingly utilized, examining their outcomes and safety in real-world scenarios is crucial. This study investigated the management and outcomes of TEVAR and EVAR as alternatives to traditional open surgical repair for managing aortic pathologies. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed the data from 59 consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR or EVAR between 2015 and 2022 at a single tertiary care center. The primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were complications assessment, including re-intervention and occurrence of endoleaks. Results: TEVAR accounted for 47.5% of cases (n = 28), while EVAR comprised 52.5% (n = 31). Patients were mostly 61-70 years old (23.7%) and male (91.5%). Surgery indications differed, with aneurysmal repair being the prevalent indication for EVAR (90.3%, n = 28) and trauma being the main indication for TEVAR (67.9%, n = 19). Regarding the primary outcome, 11 patients (18.6%) died for various reasons; of those, 2 patients (3.4%) were determined to have died from vascular-related issues. Most patients (81.4%, n = 48) did not experience intraoperative complications. The most common intraoperative complications were endoleaks and access failure, each affecting 5.1% (n = 3) of patients. Re-intervention was necessary in 16.9% (n = 10) of cases, with endoleaks being the major indication (60%). Emergency intervention was more frequent in the TEVAR group (p = 0.013), resulting in significantly longer hospitalization (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Despite limitations, our analysis indicates a good safety profile with high success rates and a low incidence of adverse health outcomes and mortality in TEVAR/EVAR procedures. Nevertheless, the results emphasize the ongoing concern of endograft leaks, necessitating re-interventions.

Sex Comparative Analysis of Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Female sex is a risk factor for adverse events after endovascular aortic repair. Sex comparative early and midterm outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic arch repair (F/B-Arch) are presented.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective sex comparative analysis of consecutive patients managed with F/B-Arch was conducted according to STROBE. Primary outcomes were sex comparative technical success, death, and cerebrovascular morbidity at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for follow up outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 209 patients, 38.3% were women. Coronary artery disease (p < .001) and previous myocardial infarction (p = .01) were more common in women. Non-native proximal aortic landing was higher in women (women: 51.3%; men: 31.8%, p = .005) and the aortic dissection rate was lower (28.8% vs. 48.1%, p = .005). Proximal landing to Ishimaru zones showed no difference (zone 0: p = .18; zone 1: p = .47; zone 2: p = .39). Graft configurations were equally distributed. In total, 416 supra-aortic trunks were bridged. The median number of revascularisations per patient was two (interquartile range 1, 3), with no difference between sexes (p = .54). Technical success (women: 97.5%; men: 96.9%, p = .80), 30 day mortality rate (women: 10%; men: 9.3%, p = .86), and cerebrovascular morbidity (women: 11.3%; men: 17.1%, p = .25) were similar. Women presented more access related complications (women: 32.5%; men: 16.3%, p = .006), without affecting access related re-interventions (p = .55). Survival (women: 81.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76.3 - 85.9%; men: 79.8%, 95% CI 76.0 - 83.6%) and freedom from re-intervention (women: 56.6%, 95% CI 50.4 - 62.8%; men: 55.3%, 95% CI 50.1 - 60.5%) at 12 months were similar (log rank, p = .40 and p = .41, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both sexes presented similar outcomes after F/B-Arch. Appropriate patient selection may decrease the effect of sex in F/B-Arch outcomes.

Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis

This umbrella meta-analysis aims to investigate two surgical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgery repair (OSR). Our study aims to elucidate the 30-day mortality rate, reintervention rates, and aneurysm-related mortality in EVAR versus OSR for AAA.  We conducted a comprehensive assessment of meta-analyses (n = 34 articles) comparing EVAR and OSR for AAA. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and considered statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05. For the 30-day mortality rate, a pooled odds ratio (pOR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.77, P = 0.0001, and I2 = 98%) indicates that EVAR was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to OSR. For reintervention rates, a pOR of 1.33 (95% CI = 0.98-1.82, P = 0.11, and I2 = 90%). In aneurysm-related mortality, a pOR of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03, and I2 = 43%). In postoperative rupture of aneurysm, a pOR of 3.28 (95% CI = 2.16-4.98, P < 0.00001, and I2 = 50%). Furthermore, when analyzing systemic complications, only for visceral ischemia, significant results showed lower odds for EVAR, with a pOR of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.80, P = 0.001, and I2 = 0%) was found.  EVAR is better in terms of short-term mortality rate and aneurysm-related mortality. Furthermore, EVAR is still a safer procedure in elective settings, as the studies we included recruited patients for this setting. However, given the high reintervention rates and recent developments in surgical techniques and materials, more recent data and extensive research are needed.

Sex-Comparative Outcomes of the T-Branch Device for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Females are at increased risk of mortality compared to males after complex endovascular aortic repair. This study aims to examine sex-related peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in patients managed with the t-Branch device.

METHODS

A two-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with the off-the-shelf t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were sex-comparative 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI).

RESULTS

A total of 542 patients were included; 28.0% were females. Urgent repair and type I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms were more common among females (52.6% vs. 34%, p = 0.01, and 57.1% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.004). Technical success was similar (97.4% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.755), as well as early mortality (16.2% in females vs. 10.8% in males; p = 0.084). SCI rates were similar between groups (13.6% vs. 9.2% p = 0.183). MAEs were more common in females; 33.7% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis did not identify sex as an independent predictor of adverse events. The 12-month survival rate was 75.7% (SE 0.045) for females and 84.1% (SE 0.026) for males (log rank, p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex was not detected as an independent factor of mortality, MAEs and SCI within patients managed with the t-Branch device. Feasibility was high in both groups. No significant difference was shown in survival during the 12-month follow-up.

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Females Treated with t-Branch off the Shelf Device

BACKGROUND

Female sex has been characterized as a risk factor of increased mortality in patients managed for complex aortic aneurysm using endovascular means. This study aimed to present the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of females managed electively or urgently with the t-Branch device and investigate factors affecting the early outcomes.

METHODS

A 2-center retrospective observational study was conducted including elective and urgent female patients managed with the t-Branch device (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2020. Primary early outcomes included technical success and 30-day mortality and morbidity [spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and acute kidney injury]. Follow-up survival and freedom from reintervention rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 153 females were included; 81 (52.9%) treated urgently. Urgent patients were older (73.2 ± 8.6 vs. 68.5 ± 6.8 years; P < 0.001) and presented higher previous coronary angioplasty/stenting (16.0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.005) and lower double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 46.3% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.04) rates. Technical success was 97.4%. Early mortality was 16.3% (22% in urgent; 12% in elective; P = 0.2) and SCI and acute kidney injury were diagnosed in 13.7% (11% in urgent; 16% in elective; P = 0.2) and 18.3% (22.2% in urgent; 13.9% in elective; P = 0.18), respectively. Multivariate regression analyses showed that DAPT and b-blockers were related to lower 30-day mortality. DAPT was also preventive for SCI. Survival rates were 68.4% [standard error (SE) 0.07] at 12 months for the urgent and 75.6% (SE 0.09) at 24 months for the elective group (P = 0.14). Freedom from reintervention rates were 81.4% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 64.7% (SE 0.09) at 18 months for the urgent and 81.7% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 75.4% (SE 0.081) at 18 months for the elective group (P = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients managed with the t-Branch device for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms in elective and urgent setting presented similar 30-day mortality and SCI rates.

Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for the Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms of 5.0-5.5 cm: Differences between Men and Women

BACKGROUND

There is significant debate regarding the existence of sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of men versus women affected by abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study is to compare endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal AAAs with the current sex-neutral 5.0-5.5 cm-diameter threshold for intervention between the two sexes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive cases from a single teaching institution over a period of five years of patients who had undergone elective EVAR for AAAs between 5.0 and 5.5 cm in diameter. Outcomes of interest were compared according to sex.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included in the analysis, with a higher prevalence of men (53%). Females were older at the time of repair, 78 ± 5.1 years, versus 71.7 ± 7 years (p < 0.01), and had higher incidence of underlying comorbidities, namely, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, and previous carotid revascularization. Women had higher incidence of immediate systemic complications (p = 0.021), post-operative AMI (p = 0.001), arrhythmia (p = 0.006), pulmonary oedema (p < 0.001), and persistent renal dysfunction (p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis for post-operative factors associated to mortality and adjusted for sex confirmed that AMI (p = 0.015), arrhythmia (p = 0.049), pulmonary oedema (p = 0.015), persistent renal dysfunction (p < 0.001), cerebral ischemia (p < 0.001), arterial embolism of lower limbs (p < 0.001), and deep-vein thrombosis of lower limbs (p < 0.001) were associated to higher EVAR-related mortality; a higher incidence of post-operative AMI (p = 0.014), pulmonary edema (p = 0.034), and arterial embolism of lower limbs (p = 0.046) were associated to higher 30-days mortality. In females there was also a higher rate of suprarenal fixation (p = 0.026), insertion outside the instruction for use (p = 0.035), and a more hostile neck anatomy with different proximal aortic diameter (p < 0.001) and angle (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

A similar threshold of size of AAA for elective surgery for both males and females might not be appropriate for surgical intervention, as females tend to have worse outcomes. Further population-based studies are needed to guide on sex-related differences and intervention on AAA.

The measurable impact of a diversity, equity, and inclusion editor on diversifying content, authorship, and peer review participation in the Journal of Vascular Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Women and minorities remain under-represented in academic vascular surgery. This under-representation persists in the editorial peer review process which may contribute to publication bias. In 2020, the Journal of Vascular Surgery (JVS) addressed this by diversifying the editorial board and creating a new Editor of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). The impact of a DEI editor on modifying the output of JVS has not yet been examined. We sought to determine the measurable impact of a DEI editor on diversifying perspectives represented in the journal, and on contributing to changes in the presence of DEI subject matter across published journal content.

METHODS

The authorship and content of published primary research articles, editorials, and special articles in JVS were examined from November 2019 through July 2022. Publications were examined for the year prior to initiation of the DEI Editor (pre), the year following (post), and from September 2021 to July 2022, accounting for the average 47-week time period from submission to publication in JVS (lag). Presence of DEI topics and women authorship were compared using χ² tests.

RESULTS

During the period examined, the number of editorials, guidelines, and other special articles dedicated to DEI topics in the vascular surgery workforce or patient population increased from 0 in the year prior to 4 (16.7%) in the 11-month lag period. The number of editorials, guidelines, and other special articles with women as first or senior authors nearly doubled (24% pre, 44.4% lag; P = .31). Invited commentaries and discussions were increasingly written by women as the study period progressed (18.7% pre, 25.9% post, 42.6% lag; P = .007). The number of primary research articles dedicated to DEI topics increased (5.6% pre, 3.3% post, 8.1% lag; P = .007). Primary research articles written on DEI topics were more likely to have women first or senior authors than non-DEI specific primary research articles (68.0% of all DEI vs 37.5% of a random sampling of non-DEI primary research articles; P < .001). The proportion of distinguished peer reviewers increased (from 2.8% in 2020 to 21.9% in 2021; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a DEI editor to JVS significantly impacted the diversification of topics, authorship of editorials, special articles, and invited commentaries, as well as peer review participation. Ongoing efforts are needed to diversify subject matter and perspective in the vascular surgery literature and decrease publication bias.