In-Hospital Complications and Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy

Higher Rate of Reinterventions after Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting in Symptomatic Patients: A Retrospective Stroke Center's Cohort Study Between 2015-2024

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenosis is a significant contributor to ischemic strokes, and its surgical management includes carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). CEA has traditionally been preferred, but TF-CAS and TCAR are also excellent alternative options if the anatomy of the vessels allows them. This study reports our short- and mid-term outcomes after carotid artery revascularization in symptomatic patients at a stroke center.

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2024. All patients with focal neurological symptoms attributable to ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis within 6 months before the intervention were included. Primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included mid-term stroke, MI, death, restenosis, and reinterventions. Statistical analyses were performed using R v 4.4.1, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for sub-group analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 183 interventions on 178 patients were analyzed (TF-CAS = 118, CEA = 55, and TCAR = 10), with a mean age of 71.5 ± 9.6 years. The cohort included 123 male (69.1%) and 55 female (30.9%) patients. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) prevalence was higher in TCAR patients (30.0%) compared to CEA (5.5%) and TF-CAS (5.3%) (P = 0.04). TF-CAS patients had a higher rate of preoperative stroke (68.6%) compared to CEA (50.9%) (P = 0.02); though there was no difference in stroke severity (NIHSS in TF-CAS: 6.8 ± 7.2 vs. CEA: 5.7 ± 7.1; P = 0.86). CEA patients had a higher rate of TIAs (43.6%) than TF-CAS (25.0%) (P = 0.02); but their ABCD2 score did not differ (CEA 3.6 ± 1.6 vs. TF-CAS 3.4 ± 1.5, P = 0.92). Preoperative amaurosis fugax rates were similar (TF-CAS:16.4% vs. CEA 14.4% P = 0.72) among groups. Carotid artery degree of stenosis measured by computed tomography angiography (CTA) was significantly higher in TF-CAS (75.1 ± 17.2) than in CEA (69.6 ± 18.3) (P = 0.01). A vulnerable plaque was found in 60% of CEA and 50% of TF-CAS patients (P = 0.42). TF-CAS had longer hospitalizations than CEA patients (TF-CAS median of 14.0 (IQR: 2.0-16.0) days versus CEA median of 9.0 (IQR 2.0-15.0) days; P < 0.01). Transient cranial nerve injuries occurred in 5.5% of CEA patients but none in TF-CAS patients (P = 0.03). Thirty-day combined ipsilateral stroke, MI and death were 0.0% for CEA and 5.0% for TF-CAS (P = 0.18). Two perioperative deaths occurred among TF-CAS patients, who were older than 70 years of age and with NIHSS of 19 and 8 on presentation. Mid-term follow-up was 1.2 ± 1.4 years. Mid-term combined ipsilateral TIA, stroke, MI, and death were 21.8% for CEA and 22.9% for TF-CAS (P = 0.88). TF-CAS had a higher rate of restenosis (11.0%, P = 0.01) and reintervention (12.7%, P < 0.01) compared to CEA. Reinterventions included cutting-balloon angioplasties, CEA, and TCAR.

CONCLUSION

TF-CAS is associated with higher, but no significant perioperative mortality, particularly in patients over 70 years of age. Thirty-day and mid-term composite outcomes including ipsilateral stroke, MI, and death are similar in the CEA and TF-CAS groups. However, restenosis occurred more frequently in the TF-CAS group, leading to a higher rate of reintervention, the earliest occurring 2 months after initial intervention. Careful patient selection may mitigate the need for reinterventions in patients undergoing TF-CAS.

The effect of preoperative smoking status on carotid endarterectomy outcomes in asymptomatic patients

OBJECTIVE

The current medical landscape lacks comprehensive data regarding the impact of preoperative smoking status on both short and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study seeks to elucidate the influence of smoking cessation on in-hospital and long-term outcomes in this patient population.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Vascular Quality Initiative for all asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA from 2016 to 2023. Outcomes were compared across three different smoking status groups: never smoke (NS), current smoker (CS), and quit >30 days ago. Our primary outcomes included in-hospital stroke, death, and myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included 1-year and 3-year death. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the following preoperative factors: age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, coronary artery disease, prior congestive heart failure, renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, prior coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention, prior CEA/carotid artery stenting, degree of stenosis, urgency, anesthesia type, and medications.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 85,237 CEA cases with 22,343 NS (26.2%), 41,731 who quit >30 days ago (49.0%) , and 21,163 CS (24.8%). Notably, NS tended to be older and more likely to be female. In contrast, patients who quit >30 days ago were more likely to have comorbidities, including obesity, coronary artery disease, prior congestive heart failure, and CKD, as well as prior procedures. Patients who are CS were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stenosis of >80%. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found no statistical difference for in-hospital stroke, death, myocardial infarction outcomes across the three groups. However, the long-term outcomes revealed quit >30 days ago and CS compared with NS had higher odds of 1-year death (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.5; P < .001; OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; P < .001) and 3-year death (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6; P < .001; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7; P < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in midterm mortality outcomes between those who quit >30 days ago and CS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national study, we found that smoking status did not emerge as a substantial determinant of adverse short-term outcomes for asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. However, smoking did adversely affect midterm mortality in these patients. In light of these findings, our study suggests that delaying CEA for smokers may not be warranted. It is crucial to recognize that the complex relationship between smoking and surgical outcomes requires further exploration and validation through additional prospective studies.

What Is the Best Technique for Treating Carotid Disease?

This is a comprehensive review of carotid artery revascularization techniques: Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting (TFCAS), and Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR). CEA is the gold standard and is particularly effective in elderly and high-risk patients. TFCAS, introduced as a less invasive alternative, poses increased periprocedural stroke risks. TCAR, which combines minimally invasive benefits with CEA's neuroprotection principles, emerges as a safer option for high-risk patients, showing comparable results to CEA and better outcomes than TFCAS. The decision-making process for carotid revascularization is complex and influenced by the patient's medical comorbidities and anatomic factors.

Outcomes following carotid revascularization for stroke stratified by Modified Rankin Scale and time of intervention

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS.

METHODS

We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate.

RESULTS

We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention.

What Is the Role of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization?

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold-standard method of carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients with ≥50% and in asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) has been associated with higher perioperative stroke rates compared to CEA in several studies. On the other hand, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has outperformed TFCAS in patients who are considered high risk for surgery. There is increasing data that supports TCAR as a safe and efficient technique with outcomes similar to those of CEA, but additional level-one studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TCAR in high- and standard-risk patients.

Urgent Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Occlusion is Associated with a High Mortality

OBJECTIVE

Interventions for carotid occlusions are infrequently undertaken and the outcomes are poorly defined. We sought to study patients undergoing urgent carotid revascularization for symptomatic occlusions.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried from 2003 to 2020 to identify patients with carotid occlusions undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Only symptomatic patients undergoing urgent interventions within 24 hours of presentation were included. Patients were identified based on CT and MRI imaging. This cohort was compared to symptomatic patients undergoing urgent intervention for severe stenosis (≥80%). Primary endpoints were perioperative stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI) and composite outcomes as defined by the SVS reporting guidelines. Patient characteristics were analyzed to determine predictors of perioperative mortality and neurological events.

RESULTS

390 patients who underwent urgent CEA for symptomatic occlusions were identified. The mean age was 67.4±10.2 years (range 39 to 90 years). The cohort was predominantly male (60%) with associated risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, including hypertension (87.4%), diabetes (34.4%), coronary artery disease (21.6%) and current smoking (38.7%). This population had high utilization of medications including statin (78.6%), P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (32.0%), aspirin (77.9%) and renin-angiotensin inhibitor (43.7%) preoperatively. When compared to patients undergoing urgent endarterectomy for severe stenosis (≥80%), those with symptomatic occlusion were well matched with regards to risk factors, but the severe stenosis cohort appeared better medically managed and less likely to present with cortical stroke symptoms. Perioperative outcomes were significantly worse for the carotid occlusion cohort, primarily driven by higher perioperative mortality (2.8% vs 0.9%, P<.001). The composite endpoint of stroke/death/MI was also significantly worse in the occlusion cohort (7.7% vs 4.9%, P=.014). On multivariate analysis, carotid occlusion was associated with increased mortality (OR, 3.028; 95% CI, 1.362-6.730; P=.007) and composite outcome of stroke, death, or MI (OR, 1.790; 95% CI, 1.135-2.822, P=.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Revascularization for symptomatic carotid occlusion constitutes approximately 2% of carotid interventions captured in the VQI, affirming the rarity of this undertaking. These patients have acceptable rates of perioperative neurologic events but are at an elevated risk of overall perioperative adverse events, primarily driven by higher mortality, compared to those with severe stenosis. Carotid occlusion appears to be the most significant risk factor for the composite endpoint of perioperative stroke, death, or MI. While intervention for a symptomatic carotid occlusion may be performed with acceptable rate of perioperative complications, judicious patient selection is warranted in this high-risk cohort.

Postoperative Disability and One-Year Outcomes for Patients Suffering a Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Although post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) strokes are rare, they can be devastating. The degree of disability that patients develop after such events and its effects on long-term outcomes are unclear. Our goal was to assess the extent of postoperative disability in patients suffering strokes after CEA and evaluate its association with long-term outcomes.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative CEA registry (2016-2020) was queried for CEAs performed for asymptomatic or symptomatic indications in patients with preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-1. The mRS grades stroke-related disability as 0 (none), 1 (not significant), 2-3 (moderate), 4-5 (severe), and 6 (dead). Patients suffering postoperative strokes with recorded mRS scores were included. Postoperative stroke-related disability based on mRS and its association with long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 149,285 patients undergoing CEA, there were 1,178 patients without preoperative disability who had postoperative strokes and reported mRS scores. Mean age was 71 ± 9.2 years and 59.6% of patients were male. Regarding ipsilateral cortical symptoms within six months preoperatively, 83.5% of patients were asymptomatic, 7.3% had transient ischemic attacks, and 9.2% had strokes. Postoperative stroke-related disability was classified as mRS 0 (11.6%), 1 (19.5%), 2-3 (29.4%), 4-5 (31.5%), and 6 (8%). One-year survival stratified by postoperative stroke-related disability was 91.4% for mRS 0, 95.6% for mRS 1, 92.1% for mRS 2-3, and 81.5% for mRS 4-5 (P<.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that while severe postoperative disability was associated with increased death at one year (HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.5-5.89, P=.002), moderate postoperative disability had no such association (HR .95, 95% CI .45-2, P=.88). One-year freedom from subsequent ipsilateral neurological events or death stratified by postoperative stroke-related disability was 87.8% for mRS 0, 93.3% for mRS 1, 88.5% for mRS 2-3, and 77.9% for mRS 4-5 (P<.001). Severe postoperative disability was independently associated with increased ipsilateral neurological events or death at one year (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.25-4.38, P=.01). However, moderate postoperative disability exhibited no such association (HR .92, 95% CI .46-1.82, P=.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients without preoperative disability who suffered strokes after CEA developed significant disability. Severe stroke-related disability was associated with higher one-year mortality and subsequent neurological events. These data can improve informed consent for CEA and guide prognostication after postoperative strokes.

In-hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy for stroke stratified by modified Rankin scale score and time of intervention

OBJECTIVE

Although the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treating symptomatic carotid stenosis are well known, the optimal timing of intervention after acute stroke and whether the optimal timing will vary with preoperative stroke severity has remained unclear. Therefore, we assessed the effect of stroke severity and timing of the intervention on the postoperative outcomes for patients who had undergone CEA for stroke.

METHODS

We identified all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who had undergone CEA from 2012 to 2020 for prior stroke. The patients were stratified using the preoperative modified Rankin scale score (mRS score, 0-5) and time to CEA after stroke onset (≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days). After univariate comparisons, the patients were stratified into the following mRS cohorts for further analysis: 0 to 1, 2, 3 to 4, and 5. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death.

RESULTS

We identified 15,601 patients, of whom 30% had had an mRS score of 0, 34% an mRS score of 1, 17% an mRS score of 2, 11% an mRS score of 3, 8% an mRS score of 4, and 1% an mRS score of 5. Overall, 9.3% of the patients had undergone CEA within ≤2 days, 46% within 3 to 14 days, 36% in 15 to 90 days, and 8.4% within 90 to 180 days. A decreasing mRS score and an increasing time to CEA were associated with lower rates of perioperative stroke/death (P_trend < .01). After risk adjustment, with CEA at 3 to 14 days as the comparator group, the mRS score 0 to 1 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (3.6% vs 2.0%; odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.7). The mRS score 2 group had had a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (4.4% vs 3.9%; OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.3) but a lower incidence after CEA at 15 to 90 days (2.1% vs 3.9%; OR 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.96). The mRS score 3 to 4 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (8.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9) but a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA at 15 to 90 days (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.3). For the mRS score 5 group, the stroke/death rates were ≥6.5% across all the time to CEA groups. However, the low sample size limited meaningful comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with minimal disability after stroke (mRS score, 0-1) seemed to benefit from CEA within 3 to 14 days. However, those with severe disability (mRS score 5) have a very high risk from CEA at any time point given the poor outcomes. In contrast to the current guidelines, patients with mild disability (mRS score 2) could benefit from delaying CEA to 15 to 90 days, and those with moderate disability (mRS score 3-4) might benefit from CEA within 3 to 90 days given the acceptable in-hospital outcomes. These data should be considered within the context of the clinical situation in the weeks after index event to determine the net benefit of delayed CEA.

[Long-term results conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze immediate and long-term results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within a multicenter registry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, multi-center, comparative study included 375 patients who underwent CEA between February 1, 2018 and February 1, 2022. Depending on the type of operation, the sample was stratified into the eversion CEA (group 1, n=218) and conventional CEA with plasty of the reconstruction area with a diepoxy-treated xenopericardium patch (group 2, n=157). The long-term follow-up period was 26.5±18.3 months. Information about the condition of patients and the development of complications was obtained by telephone questioning and calling patients to the clinic for a follow-up examination.

RESULTS

No myocardial infarction was diagnosed in the hospital postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of acute cerebrovascular accident. The only cause of death after conventional CEA was hemorrhagic stroke. According to the section study, the cause of death was edema with dislocation of the brain stem. The remaining strokes in both groups (1 case each) were of the ischemic type. The probable cause was a distal embolism following the use of a temporary shunt. During conservative treatment, the neurological deficit completely regressed on days 21 and 26, respectively. In the late postoperative period, significant differences were obtained in the incidence of stroke (group 1: n=2; 0.91%; group 2: n=6; 3.8%; p=0.05; OR - 0.23; 95% CI=0.04-1.17) and restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) more than 60% (group 1: n=0; group 2: n=11; 7.0%; p<0.0001; OR - 0.03, 95% CI=0.001-0.49).

CONCLUSION

The eversion CEA technique demonstrated a lower risk of developing hemodynamically significant restenosis of the internal carotid artery in the long-term follow-up period. To obtain convincing evidence of the effectiveness of eversion or conventional CEA, additional randomized multicenter trials with the inclusion of results in clinical guidelines are required.

Outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization stratified by preprocedural symptom status

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies on carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting demonstrated that perioperative outcomes differed according to preoperative neurologic injury severity, but this has not been assessed in transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). In this study, we examined contemporary perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent TCAR stratified by specific preprocedural symptom status.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TCAR between 2016 and 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. We stratified patients into the following groups based on preprocedural symptoms: asymptomatic, recent (symptoms occurring <180 days before TCAR) ocular transient ischemic attack (TIA), recent hemispheric TIA, recent stroke, or formerly symptomatic (symptoms occurring >180 days before TCAR). First, we used trend tests to assess outcomes in asymptomatic patients versus those with an increasing severity of recent neurologic injury (recent ocular TIA vs recent hemispheric TIA vs recent stroke). Then, we compared outcomes between asymptomatic and formerly symptomatic patients. Our primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups.

RESULTS

We identified 18,477 patients undergoing TCAR, of whom 62.0% were asymptomatic, 3.2% had a recent ocular TIA, 7.6a % had recent hemispheric TIA, 18.0% had a recent stroke, and 9.2% were formerly symptomatic. In patients with recent symptoms, we observed higher rates of stroke/death with increasing neurologic injury severity: asymptomatic 1.1% versus recent ocular TIA 0.8% versus recent hemispheric TIA 2.1% versus recent stroke 3.1% (Ptrend < .01). In formerly symptomatic patients, the rate of stroke/death was higher compared with asymptomatic patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (1.7% vs 1.1%; P = .06). After risk adjustment, compared with asymptomatic patients, there was a higher odds of stroke/death in patients with a recent stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.7; P < .01), a recent hemispheric TIA (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.0; P < .01), and former symptoms (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02), but there was no difference in stroke/death rates in patients with a recent ocular TIA (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2.2; P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

After TCAR, compared with asymptomatic status, a recent stroke and a recent hemispheric TIA were associated with higher stroke/death rates, whereas a recent ocular TIA was associated with similar stroke/death rates. In addition, a formerly symptomatic status was associated with higher stroke/death rates compared with an asymptomatic status. Overall, our findings suggest that classifying patients undergoing TCAR as symptomatic versus asymptomatic may be an oversimplification and that patients' specific preoperative neurologic symptoms should instead be used in risk assessment and outcome reporting for TCAR.