Steerable sheath for exclusively femoral bilateral extension of previous fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair with iliac branch devices

Use of steerable sheaths for complex aortic procedures

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the ease with which steerable sheaths, designed for cardiac electrophysiological applications, can be used to aid endovascular treatment of a wide range of non-cardiac vascular disease and to assist with target vessel cannulation in branched and fenestrated aortic grafts.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review was carried out to identify cases from a single vascular surgery unit (2019-2022) where the HeartSpan Steerable Sheath (HSS) (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT, USA) was utilised to enable endovascular management of complex vascular pathology. A case presentation of branch graft insertion performed entirely via distal access is described and used to help identify pertinent sheath characteristics and technical considerations, and to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the design for modified use in target vessel cannulation.

RESULTS

The HSS was used in the endovascular treatment of different vascular pathologies in 15 patients (23 target vessels) where access to the vessels using standard catheters and approaches was not possible. Cannulation and subsequent stenting were successful for 21 of the 23 target vessels in total. Of these cases, the HSS was used as an adjunct for deployment of fenestrated endovascular graft systems when conventional techniques for canulation of target vessels had failed on five occasions. On another four occasions, the HSS enabled full deployment of the entire Zenith® t-Branch™ Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Graft system from an exclusively femoral approach. An additional three cases involved use of the HSS for superior mesenteric artery cannulation in patients with mesenteric ischaemia. The device was also used once in each of the following cases: contralateral common iliac cannulation, cannulation of contralateral internal iliac artery for coil embolisation, and access of a contralateral iliac branched device. There were no stent dislocations and all aortic branches that were patent at the completion of each case remained so 1-year post procedure.

CONCLUSION

Steerable sheaths designed for cardiac electrophysical applications, like the HSS Introducer, can be successfully utilised for cannulation of challenging target vessels in a wide range of aortic endovascular procedures. This modified approach may salvage cases that would otherwise be considered inoperable in regions of the world where steerable sheaths designed for aortic use are not readily available.

Iliac Branch Devices in the Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of preserving the internal iliac artery (IIA) with iliac branched devices (IBDs) during acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysm with an IBD at 8 aortic centers between December 2012 and June 2020. A control group was used where the IIA was intentionally occluded from the same study period. The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, major adverse events, technical success, and clinical success. Secondary outcomes were buttock claudication, primary patency, primary-assisted and secondary patency of the IBD, occurrence of endoleak types I/III, and reintervention. Values are presented as numbers and percentages or interquartile range in parenthesis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in the study: 24 with IBD and 24 with IIA occlusion. There was no difference in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent. Twenty (83%) of them were hemodynamically stable during the procedure as opposed to 14 (58%, p=.23) with the IIA occlusion. Technical success was achieved in all cases with a procedure time of 180 (133-254) minutes, 45 (23-65) of which were from IBD. There were 2 (8%) deaths during the first 30 days and 2 (8%) major complications unrelated to the IBD, whereas in the IIA occlusion, the figures were 10 (42%) and 7 (29%), respectively. No patient in the IBD group developed buttock claudication compared to 8 (57%, p<.0001) in the IIA occlusion group; 1 (4%) patient developed bowel ischemia on both groups, with 1 in the IIA occlusion group needing resection. The median follow-up duration was 17 months (interquartile range 2-39) for the IBD group, with a primary patency of 60±14% at 3 years that went up to 92±8% with reinterventions (8 reinterventions in 6 patients). When the first 90 days were disregarded, there were no differences in survival between the groups.

CONCLUSION

IBD is a valid alternative for maintaining the pelvic circulation for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. The technical success and midterm outcomes are very satisfactory but require patient selection particularly regarding hemodynamic stability. The reintervention rate is considerable, mandating continuous follow-up.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This multicenter study demonstrates that ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms do not necessarily require mandatory occlusion of hypogastric arteries. Iliac branch devices are shown to be a valid alternative in highly selected cases, with good midterm results, even if reinterventions are required in a significant proportion of patients.

Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts

OBJECTIVE

To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An "up-and-over" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice.

CLINICAL IMPACT

In this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.