Kidney biopsy–based management of maintenance immunosuppression is safe and may ameliorate flare rate in lupus nephritis

Factors associated with worsening interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy in lupus nephritis patients undergoing clinically indicated repeat kidney biopsy

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) on kidney biopsies strongly predicts progression to end-stage renal disease although factors associated with IFTA progression remained unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and histopathological factors at the time of index kidney biopsies that are associated with worsening IFTA on repeat biopsies and identify potential biomarkers of worsening interstitial damage.

METHODS

Patients with LN Class I to V or mixed LN on index biopsies who underwent a clinically indicated repeat biopsy between 2004 and 2020 were identified. None-mild IFTA was defined as < 25% acreage of the interstitium affected by fibrosis and atrophy, and moderate-severe IFTA was defined as ≥ 25% of the interstitium affected. Patients with none-mild IFTA on index biopsies who progressed to moderate-severe IFTA on repeat biopsies were defined as progressors. Patients with none-mild IFTA on both biopsies were defined as non-progressors.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients who underwent clinically indicated repeat kidney biopsies were included, and 35 (49%) were identified as progressors. Compared to non-progressors, progressors had a higher proportion of proliferative LN (26 [74%] vs. 18 [49%], p = 0.04) and crescents (9 [26%] vs. 3 [8%], p = 0.045) on index biopsies. There was no difference regarding the time to repeat biopsy or the baseline characteristics, including eGFR, presence of hypertension and diabetes, urine protein to creatinine ratio, or the initial treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Proliferative LN and the presence of crescents on index biopsies were associated with subsequent IFTA progression on repeat biopsies. This association indicates that glomerular damage is one of the major drivers of tubulointerstitial scarring in SLE. IFTA progression may, in turn, be the driving factor of poor treatment response and progression to chronic kidney disease.

Immunosuppressives discontinuation after renal response in lupus nephritis: predictors of flares, time to withdrawal and long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The optimal duration of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) remains uncertain. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of IS tapering and discontinuation (D/C) in LN patients.

METHODS

Data from 137 inception cohort LN patients were analysed. We examined determinants of flares during tapering and after IS D/C, D/C achievement and time to D/C, and adverse long-term outcomes applying logistic and linear regression models.

RESULTS

IS tapering was attempted in 111 (81%) patients, and D/C was achieved in 67.5%. Longer time to achieve complete renal response (CR) [odds ratio (OR): 1.07, P = 0.046] and higher SLEDAI-2K at tapering initiation (OR: 2.57, P = 0.008) were correlated with higher risk of renal flares during tapering. Persistent hydroxychloroquine use (≥2/3 of follow-up) (OR: 0.28, P = 0.08) and lower SLEDAI-2K 12 months before IS D/C (OR: 1.70, P = 0.013) decreased the risk of post-D/C flares. Adverse outcomes (>30% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, death) at the end of follow-up (median 124 months) were more frequent in patients with flares during IS tapering (53% vs 16%, P < 0.0038) but did not differ between IS D/C achievers and non-achievers. In proliferative LN, differences mirrored those in the entire cohort, except for time to D/C, which occurred 20 months earlier in membranous vs proliferative LN (β = -19.8, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Earlier CR achievement and lower SLEDAI-2K at tapering initiation prevent flares during IS tapering, while persistent hydroxychloroquine use and lower SLEDAI-2K 12 months before IS D/C prevent post-D/C flares. Flares during tapering increase the risk of unfavourable long-term outcomes. Earlier IS D/C is feasible in membranous LN.

Lupus nephritis trials network (LNTN) repeat kidney biopsy-based definitions of treatment response: A systematic literature review-based proposal

Within the frame of the Lupus Nephritis Trials Network (LNTN), we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to propose kidney tissue-based definitions of treatment outcomes in lupus nephritis (LN). Given the limitations of clinical markers like proteinuria in predicting immunological, histological, and long-term outcomes, our work emphasises the importance of repeat kidney biopsies. Such biopsies help identify discordance between clinical and histological response, which has implications for long-term kidney outcomes. The research objectives of this SLR focused on defining repeat biopsy-based treatment response and histological remission, and their associations with long-term outcomes. The SLR reviewed studies published from 2000 to 2022, identifying 20 eligible works. Histological response was commonly defined by changes in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Activity Index (AI), with response indicated by a decrease of ≥50 % and to ≤3. Remission was most commonly defined as an AI score of 0. These benchmarks were associated with improved long-term renal outcomes, such as reduced flare rates and preserved kidney function. Conversely, NIH AI scores ≥4 and NIH Chronicity Index (CI) scores ≥4 were associated with poor prognosis, highlighting their predictive utility. Consensus definitions were established through expert panel deliberation, setting a foundation for standardising LN treatment evaluation in clinical trials and observational studies. These definitions are not intended for routine clinical decisions but aim to enhance uniformity and comparability in research, especially when repeat kidney biopsies are performed, an approach strongly advocated by our work. Further validation through ongoing initiatives and molecular characterisation efforts will refine these criteria, fostering advances in LN management and patient outcomes.

Lupus nephritis: redefining the treatment goals

The course of proliferative lupus nephritis is characterized by flares of activity alternating with periods of quiescence against a background of chronic immune dysregulation. An accurate assessment of disease activity is of unassailable importance to tailor therapy. In the present communication, we discuss the available clinical, serologic, and histologic tools to evaluate disease activity and how they may be applied to redefine the treatment goals in lupus nephritis. Traditionally, treatment response is judged by the degree of proteinuria reduction and improvement of kidney function, but this fails to differentiate ongoing inflammatory disease from chronic damage. Despite intensive research, no novel biomarker has proved useful for clinical practice, and we continue to rely on anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels to assess serologic activity. Repeat kidney biopsies sometimes reveal persistent inflammation despite apparent clinical remission, giving credibility to the conviction that histologic remission should be a treatment goal and protocol biopsies be part of the decision-making process. However, the discrepancies between clinical and histologic responses to therapy can be explained by persistent systemic autoimmunity with low-grade immune complex deposition or, alternatively, by delayed clearance of intrarenal inflammation once immunologic remission has been achieved. Because persistent immune dysregulation is the motor of disease activity in lupus nephritis, it should be the principal focus of therapy and monitoring. We propose to replace the traditional induction-remission maintenance protocol by a more dynamic and individualized approach and aim for 3 treatment goals, concomitantly rather than sequentially: (i) clinical remission, by attenuating renal inflammation, using microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and complement levels as biomarkers; (ii) immunologic remission, by decreasing immune complex generation, using anti-double-stranded DNA antibody as a biomarker; and (iii) preservation of kidney function, by curtailing chronic kidney damage, using estimated glomerular filtration rate slope as a biomarker.

Outcomes following immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after complete renal response in proliferative lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the rate and factors influencing renal relapse (RR) in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy (IST), as well as the long-term renal outcomes following RR.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre study of biopsy-confirmed LN patients who had received IST for at least 36 months and maintained complete renal response (CRR) for a minimum of 12 months before therapy discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of a total of 106 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 76 with proliferative classes were selected for analysis. The median duration of IST prior to discontinuation was 83.5 months (IQR 25th-75th: 53.5-120). Relapse occurred in 29 patients (38.2%) at a median of 26.5 months (IQR 25th-75th: 9.25-63.5 months) following IST withdrawal. Relapses were classified as severe in 9 cases (31%) and moderate in 16 cases (55.2%). Renal rebiopsy was performed in 25 of these patients (86.2%), with 80% retaining the same histological class.Discontinuation of IST at ≤34 years of age significantly increased the risk of RR (adjusted HR: 3.5). In contrast, an IST duration exceeding 48 months prior to discontinuation (HR: 0.26), maintaining CRR for at least 48 months (HR: 0.32), achieving complete remission per DORIS (definition of remission in systemic lupus erythematosus) criteria at IST withdrawal (HR: 0.21) and gradual IST tapering (HR: 0.09) were associated with a reduced risk of RR.Following reintroduction of IST, 20 out of 29 patients (68.9%) achieved CRR, 5 (17.2%) achieved a partial response and 4 (13.8%) did not respond; of these, 3 patients (10.3%) progressed to end-stage renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful withdrawal of IST is possible in carefully selected patients with proliferative LN. If an RR occurs, most patients are able to remain in remission after resuming IST.

Ten tips in lupus nephritis management

Lupus nephritis is an important cause of severe glomerulonephritis, and a leading cause of kidney failure in young adults. While the disease can lead to rapid destruction of nephrons if untreated, there are effective therapies to reverse the severe acute kidney injury and prevent the lifetime risk of kidney failure. Early diagnosis and timely intervention are therefore of critical importance. Clinical management of lupus nephritis has improved considerably over the past two decades. The advent of mycophenolate as standard immunosuppressive therapy was a major paradigm shift that improved the safety and convenience of treatment and also patients' quality of life. Effective therapeutic options continue to increase, such as belimumab (a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-cell activating factor, BAFF) and voclosporin (a calcineurin inhibitor) which have obtained regulatory approval in U.S.A. and Europe. There is also accumulating experience on tacrolimus, which has regulatory approval for lupus nephritis treatment in Japan and commonly used off-label in many countries. Ironically, the increasing therapeutic options have resulted in uncertainties in deciding which medication, and which treatment regimen, is best for a patient. In this context, one needs to take into consideration the distinct characteristics and the risk profile of each patient, and adopt a holistic and long-term perspective, so that treatment can be personalized to achieve favourable clinical outcomes.

Lupus Nephritis and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

Prevention of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major objective in the management of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) of variable severity is common in these patients, but recent literature has mostly focused on novel immunosuppressive treatments for acute LN, while the data on CKD is relatively limited. This scoping review aims to summarise available data on the prevalence and risk factors for CKD in patients with LN. PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched on the 1st November 2024 for 'real world' SLE and LN cohorts with longitudinal follow-up which reported the outcome of CKD or CKD progression and its associated risk factors. Fifteen studies were included. The prevalence of CKD ranged from below 10% to almost 50% across diverse LN and SLE cohorts. Major risk factors for CKD or CKD progression included renal impairment at presentation, renal function at 1 year post-treatment, delayed diagnosis, established chronic pathological lesions on kidney biopsy, unsatisfactory treatment response, nephritic flares, hypertension, and persistent proteinuria during follow-up. Many of the identified risk factors are amenable to therapeutic intervention. CKD not only contributes to morbidity and mortality and inferior quality of life, but also influences the choice of therapy and optimal dosing of medications. Attention to immunomodulatory medications for disease control, and non-immune strategies for renoprotection and prevention of CKD complications, are both important in the management of patients with LN to reduce their life-time risk of ESKD.

Predictive value of residual active histologic lesions on renal flare in lupus nephritis patients with clinical remission

Background

Renal flare in lupus nephritis (LN) is a crucial contributing factor to poor kidney outcomes. This study aimed at evaluating the predictive value of residual active histologic lesions on renal flare in proliferative LN patients with clinical remission.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled LN patients with class III/IV ± V (biopsy 1) who had undergone a protocol repeat biopsy (biopsy 2) at 7.3 (IQR: 6.5, 8.4) months after induction therapy with clinical remission and experienced renal flare within 3 years or had been followed up for at least 3 years without renal flare after biopsy 2 with maintenance therapy from two kidney units in China.

Results

A total of 114 eligible patients were included, 28 (24.6%) of whom developed a renal flare. Activity index (AI) at biopsy 2 was significantly associated with LN flare (P < .0001). If AI > 1, the OR for LN flare was 23.1 (95%CI, 5.1-103.8, P < .001). For patients with partial clinical remission compared with those with complete clinical remission, the OR for LN flare was 3.0 (95%CI: 1.1-8.3, P = .029). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-dsDNA positivity, presence of cellular/fibrocellular crescent, and endocapillary hypercellularity at biopsy 2 were independent risk factors for LN flare. When residual active histologic lesions were added to clinical variables, the area under the curve of the prediction model for LN flare significantly increased and the misclassification rate significantly decreased.

Conclusions

Renal flare in LN patients with clinical remission is strongly associated with the residual active histologic lesions.

Kidney histopathology in predicting flares following drug withdrawal in proliferative lupus nephritis in clinical remission

Residual renal histopathological activity at clinical remission in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis (PLN) can predict renal flare upon immunosuppression withdrawal. Data on the role of histological renal remission in predicting extra-renal flares is lacking. We assessed renal histopathology prior to drug withdrawal and the occurrence of renal and extra-renal flares over 52 weeks after drug withdrawal in PLN patients in long-term clinical remission. This is a subgroup analysis of a non-inferiority, open-label randomized (1:1) controlled trial. Patients with biopsy-proven Class III/IV LN in the past (biopsy 1), on immunosuppressants (IS) ≥ 3 years, in clinical remission for ≥ 1 year, on stable prednisolone dose (≤ 7.5 mg/day) plus a maintenance IS and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were subjected to a repeat renal biopsy (biopsy 2). Individuals with biopsy 2 having activity index (AI) < 4/24 were randomised to either prednisolone or IS withdrawal. Primary end-point was the proportion experiencing a flare [SELENA-SLEDAI flare index (SFI)] at week 52. Twenty-eight eligible patients underwent biopsy 2 and randomized to prednisolone (n = 15) and IS (n = 13) withdrawal. At biopsy 1, 12 (43%) had class III, 15 (53.5%) had class IV, and 1 (3.5%) had class III + V. At biopsy 2, PLN persisted in 4 (14.2%) while 18 (64.2%) were in histological remission (AI = 0) with 6 (21.4%) in class II. Following drug withdrawal, 9/28 (32%) had flares especially musculoskeletal (55.5%), mucocutaneous (44.4%), and renal (33.3%). Among the four persistent PLN patients, one of the two (50%) with AI = 1 had extra-renal flare while both the two with AI = 2 (100%) had renal and extra-renal flares. In those with histological remission (biopsy 2), 6/18 (66.6%) experienced extra-renal flare of whom one also had renal flare. Upon drug withdrawal, renal histopathology findings with any activity index can predict renal flare while histological remission is not enough to predict extra-renal flare, thus making it an unsuitable marker for deep SLE remission.

Lupus nephritis: Biomarkers

Lupus nephritis (LN) or renal involvement of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is a common manifestation occurring in at least 50 % of SLE patients. LN remains a significant source of morbidity, often leading to progressive renal dysfunction and is a major cause of death in SLE. Despite these challenges, advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and genetic underpinnings of LN have led to a commendable expansion in available treatments over the past decade. This chapter provides a foundation for the understanding LN pathogenesis, diagnosis, and epidemiology, and guides the reader through recent advances in biomarkers, genetic susceptibility of this intricate condition.

Lupus nephritis-related chronic kidney disease

Lupus nephritis is a common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a determinant of overall morbidity and mortality, as lupus nephritis-related chronic kidney disease (CKD) drives cardiovascular disease and secondary immunodeficiency. Two lines of action are required to prevent the progression of lupus nephritis-related CKD: suppression of autoimmune SLE activity, which is a risk factor for immunopathology-related irreversible kidney injury, and management of non-immune risk factors that contribute to CKD progression. As each episode or relapse of active lupus nephritis implicates CKD progression, preventing flares of lupus nephritis is a key treatment target. Non-immune risk factors of CKD mostly include causes of nephron hyperfiltration, such as obesity, hypertension, sodium- or protein-rich diets and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as pregnancy. Nephrotoxic agents and smoking also drive kidney cell loss. Intrinsic risk factors for CKD progression include poor nephron endowment because of prematurity at birth, nephropathic genetic variants, ageing, male sex and previous or concomitant kidney diseases. Care for lupus nephritis involves the control of all modifiable risk factors of CKD progression. In addition, remnant nephron overload can be reduced using early dual therapy with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and sodium-glucose transporter-2, whereas further renoprotective drug interventions are underway. As patients with lupus nephritis are at risk of CKD progression, they would all benefit from interdisciplinary care to minimize the risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular disease and infections.

Optimal treatment targets for lupus nephritis using per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy findings at 2 years and clinical data up to 5 years: a single-center observational study

Background

The criteria for remission in both clinical and pathological contexts for lupus nephritis (LN) remain controversial.

Objectives

To identify optimal short-term goals (remission criteria) for LN predicting long-term success at 5 years, using repeat kidney biopsy (Biopsy 2) and clinical data.

Design

Single-center observational study.

Methods

Twenty-three consecutive LN patients undergoing Biopsy 2 2 years post-induction therapy were evaluated. Two ideal long-term goals at 5 years were defined as: "A," Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0 and prednisolone (PSL) ⩽5 mg/day, and "B," proteinuria ⩽0.2 g/day with a normal serum creatinine level and PSL ⩽5 mg/day. Histologically, the electron-dense deposit (EDD) score grades immune deposits based on their intensity, amount, and location. A score of ⩽1 was defined as "electron microscopy remission (ER)."

Results

Conventional renal indices failed to predict long-term goals. The short-term goals with an accuracy (area under the curve: 95% confidence interval) of ⩾0.8 predicted long-term goals: "A at 5 years" (A-5y), A-2y (0.91: 0.79-1.00), DORIS-R-2y (0.87: 0.72-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.70-1.00), B-2y (0.83: 0.66-0.99), and SLEDAI-R-2y (0.82: 0.66-0.98) as well as "B at 5 years" (B-5y), A-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), B-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.69-1.00), and DORIS-R-2y (0.83: 0.67-0.99). EDD scores predicted A-5y, B-5y, and PSL dose at 5 years in proportion to the score. The clinical and histological goals aligned.

Conclusion

The best predictive short-term goal was A-2y. Concordance between clinical remission (A-2y, B-2y, and DORIS-R-2y) and histological remission (ER) at 2 years suggests optimal short-term goals for LN.

Immune-mediating and immunosuppressive pharmacotherapies for proliferative lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION

Proliferative lupus nephritis is a common and severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Affected patients are at an increased risk of developing chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and extra-renal comorbidities. In recent years, the prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis has improved thanks to advancements in management regimens. Despite these advances, lupus nephritis continues to present therapeutic complexities and unmet needs.

AREAS COVERED

Research was conducted across major databases to identify the most relevant articles pertaining to immune-mediating and immunosuppressive therapies in lupus nephritis.

EXPERT OPINION

The prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis remains severe. Some drugs used in this disease may be unable to control activity, and most of them have a low therapeutic index and may cause severe and life-threatening side effects. Nonetheless, better management of traditional drugs and the introduction of novel therapies have improved renal prognosis and reduced local and systemic adverse events in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

Membranous nephropathy: pathogenesis and treatments

Membranous nephropathy (MN), an autoimmune disease, can manifest at any age and is among the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. In 80% of cases, the specific etiology of MN remains unknown, while the remaining cases are linked to drug use or underlying conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis B virus, or malignancy. Although about one-third of patients may achieve spontaneous complete or partial remission with conservative management, another third face an elevated risk of disease progression, potentially leading to end-stage renal disease within 10 years. The identification of phospholipase A2 receptor as the primary target antigen in MN has brought about a significant shift in disease management and monitoring. This review explores recent advancements in the pathophysiology of MN, encompassing pathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic criteria, treatment options, and prognosis, with a focus on emerging developments in pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies aimed at halting disease progression. By synthesizing the latest research findings and clinical insights, this review seeks to contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance our understanding and management of this challenging autoimmune disorder.

Anti-dsDNA IgE: a potential non-invasive test for prediction of lupus nephritis relapse

OBJECTIVES

Discontinuation or continuation of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (MIST) after a severe lupus nephritis (LN) requires measuring the risk of relapse but reliable clinical and biological markers are lacking. The WIN-IgE study assesses the value of serum anti-dsDNA IgE autoantibodies as a biomarker for the prediction of relapse in severe LN.

METHODS

WIN-IgE is an ancillary study of the WIN-Lupus study (NCT01284725), a prospective controlled clinical trial which evaluated the discontinuation of MIST after 2-3 years in class III or IV±V LN with active lesions. WIN-IgE included all patients with available serum collected at randomisation for continuation or discontinuation of MIST. In these sera, anti-dsDNA antibodies, IgE and IgG, were quantified by ELISA and compared between patients who experienced LN relapse and those who did not during the 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

52 patients were included, 25 in the MIST continuation group and 27 in the MIST discontinuation group, 12 experienced a biopsy-proven relapse of LN. Initial anti-dsDNA IgE antibodies levels were higher in patients with subsequent LN relapse. Anti-dsDNA IgG was not associated with relapse. Survival without LN relapse was lower in patients with anti-dsDNA IgE levels above vs below a threshold of 1.9 arbitrary units (p=0.019), particularly in the subgroup of patients randomised to discontinue MIST (p=0.002). In all patients, anti-dsDNA IgE above 1.9 arbitrary units had a positive predictive value of 0.8 for severe LN relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest blood anti-dsDNA IgE as a non-invasive predictive marker of LN relapse.

Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressant commonly used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. It is a known teratogen associated with significant toxicities, including an increased risk of infections and malignancies. Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal is desirable once disease quiescence is reached, but the timing of when to do so and whether it provides a benefit has not been well-studied. We aimed to determine the effects of mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal on the risk of clinically significant disease reactivation in patients with quiescent SLE on long-term mycophenolate mofetil therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, randomised trial was conducted in 19 centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 70 years old, met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 SLE criteria, and had a clinical SLEDAI score of less than 4 at screening. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy was required to be stable or decreasing for 2 years or more if initiated for renal indications, or for 1 year or more for non-renal indications. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to a withdrawal group, who tapered off mycophenolate mofetil over 12 weeks, or a maintenance group who maintained their baseline dose (1-3g per day) for 60 weeks. Adaptive random allocation ensured groups were balanced for study site, renal versus non-renal disease, and baseline mycophenolate mofetil dose (≥2 g per day vs <2 g per day). Clinically significant disease reactivation by week 60 following random allocation, requiring increased doses or new immunosuppressive therapy was the primary endpoint, in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly allocated participants who began study-provided mycophenolate mofetil). Non-inferiority was evaluated using an estimation-based approach. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01946880) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 6, 2013, and April 27, 2018, 123 participants were screened, of whom 102 were randomly allocated to the maintenance group (n=50) or the withdrawal group (n=52). Of the 100 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (49 maintenance, 51 withdrawal), 84 (84%) were women, 16 (16%) were men, 40 (40%) were White, 41 (41%) were Black, and 76 (76%) had a history of lupus nephritis. The average age was 42 (SD 12·7). By week 60, nine (18%) of 51 participants in the withdrawal group had clinically significant disease reactivation, compared to five (10%) of 49 participants in the maintenance group. The risk of clinically significant disease reactivation was 11% (95% CI 5-24) in the maintenance group and 18% (10-32) in the withdrawal group. The estimated increase in the risk of clinically significant disease reactivation with mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal was 7% (one-sided upper 85% confidence limit 15%). Similar rates of adverse events were observed in the maintenance group (45 [90%] of 50 participants) and the withdrawal group (46 [88%] of 52 participants). Infections were more frequent in the mycophenolate mofetil maintenance group (32 [64%]) compared with the withdrawal group (24 [46%]).

INTERPRETATIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal is not significantly inferior to mycophenolate mofetil maintenance. Estimates for the rates of disease reactivation and increases in risk with withdrawal can assist clinicians in making informed decisions on withdrawing mycophenolate mofetil in patients with stable SLE.

FUNDING

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Kidney Biopsy in Management of Lupus Nephritis: A Case-Based Narrative Review

Kidney involvement in patients with lupus highly increases morbidity and mortality. In recent years, several reports have emphasized the dissociation between clinical and histological findings and highlighted the role of kidney biopsy as an instrument for diagnosis and follow-up of lupus nephritis. The kidney biopsy at initial diagnosis allows an early diagnosis, assessment of activity and chronicity, and detection of nonimmune complex nephritis. A kidney biopsy repeated months after treatment aids in the detection of persistent histological inflammation, which has been linked to the occurrence of future kidney relapses. A kidney biopsy at a relapse detects histological changes including chronic scarring. Finally, a kidney biopsy in patients with a clinical response undergoing maintenance immunosuppression may aid therapy tapering and/or suspension. The evidence supporting the use of a kidney biopsy in different scenarios across the course of lupus nephritis is heterogeneous, with most reports assessing the value for the diagnosis of a first or relapsing flare. In contrast, less evidence suggests additional therapeutic-modifying information derived from repeat posttreatment biopsies and biopsies to evaluate treatment tapering or suspension. In this clinical case-based review, we examine the role of kidney biopsy as a tool to improve clinical outcomes of patients with lupus nephritis.

Factors Associated with Worsening Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy in Lupus Nephritis Patients Undergoing Repeat Kidney Biopsy

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) on kidney biopsies strongly predicts progression to end-stage renal disease. However, factors associated with progression of IFTA are not known. The objective of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and histopathological factors at the time of index kidney biopsies that are associated with worsening IFTA on repeat biopsies.

Methods

Patients with LN Class I to V or mixed LN on index biopsies who underwent a clinically indicated repeat biopsy between 2004 and 2020 were identified. None-mild IFTA was defined as < 25% acreage of the interstitium affected by fibrosis and atrophy, and moderate-severe IFTA was defined as ≥ 25% of the interstitium affected. Patients with none-mild IFTA on index biopsies who progressed to moderate-severe IFTA on repeat biopsies were defined as progressors. Patients with none-mild IFTA on both biopsies were defined as non-progressors.

Results

Seventy-two patients who underwent clinically indicated repeat kidney biopsies were included, and 35 (49%) were identified as progressors. Compared to non-progressors, progressors had a higher proportion of proliferative LN (20 [57%] vs. 6 [17%], p = 0.002) and crescents (9 [26%] vs. 3 [8%], p = 0.045) on index biopsies. There was no difference regarding the time to repeat biopsy or the baseline characteristics, including eGFR, presence of hypertension and diabetes, urine protein to creatinine ratio, or the initial treatments.

Conclusions

Proliferative LN and the presence of crescents on index biopsies were associated with subsequent IFTA progression on repeat biopsies. This association indicates that glomerular damage is one of the major drivers of tubulointerstitial scarring in SLE. IFTA progression may, in turn, be the driving factor of poor treatment response and progression to chronic kidney disease.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

Is per-protocol kidney biopsy required in lupus nephritis?

Baseline kidney biopsy is recommended in lupus nephritis (LN). Biopsy allows to classify different forms of LN and differentiate other forms of renal involvement, such as tubulo-interstitial nephritis or thrombotic microangiopathy. The indications for repeat biopsy are more controversial. Some authors feel that good clinical monitoring is sufficient to assess prognosis and make therapeutic decisions. Based on the recently demonstrated discordance between clinical and histological response, some physicians recommend per-protocol biopsies either at 6 months in stable patients to verify the response to induction therapy, or after one-to-two years to assess treatment efficacy and tune the duration of maintenance therapy. Others recommend repeating kidney biopsy in case of incomplete response or to discriminate between active and chronic lesions. By definition, a per-protocol kidney biopsy differs from a repeat biopsy in that the former is foreseen at fixed timepoints, regardless of the clinical response. Although any decision should always consider the patient's overall clinical condition, there are no doubts that repeat kidney biopsy represents a useful tool in difficult cases to evaluate treatment response, modulate treatment intensity, and predict long-term renal outcome both in quiescent lupus and during flares. How to harmonize per-protocol biopsies in the LN course remains challenging.

When should targeted therapies be used in the treatment of lupus nephritis: Early in the disease course or in refractory patients?

Although the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved over the last few decades, 5-20% of patients still progress to kidney failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to improve the management of LN. Two novel drugs, belimumab and voclosporin, have been recently approved for LN and obinutuzumab is in the late stage of development. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all these drugs, added to the standard-of-care, were more effective than standard-of-care alone in achieving renal response. Now the question is: should these new drugs be used early in the disease course or just in refractory patients? The main reasons supporting the early use are based on the RCTs that demonstrated benefits when combinatory regimen was initiated early in incident and relapsing patients leading to a higher proportion of patients to achieve renal response, hence reducing nephron loss and the risk of kidney failure. The main reasons supporting the use of the combinatory regimens primarily in relapsing/refractory patients acknowledge that many patients responded well even without add-on medications, allowing a more economic use of innovative and costly drugs. However, good predictors of renal response to standard-of-care are lacking and, thus, the decision of adding new treatments early or just in refractory or relapsing patients has to consider drug access, risks of over or undertreatment, and preservation of kidney function in high-risk individuals.

Adding 6-month parameters for the prediction of kidney prognosis in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis

Background

Antineutrophil-cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) with kidney involvement (AAV-GN) frequently evolves to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) despite aggressive immunosuppressive treatment. Several risk scores have been used to assess renal prognosis. We aimed to determine whether kidney function and markers of AAV-GN activity after 6 months could improve the prediction of ESKD.

Methods

This retrospective and observational study included adult patients with AAV-GN recruited from six French nephrology centers (including from the Maine-Anjou AAV registry). The primary outcome was kidney survival. Analyses were conducted in the whole population and in a sub-population that did not develop ESKD early in the course of the disease.

Results

When considering the 102 patients with all data available at diagnosis, Berden classification and Renal Risk Score (RRS) were not found to be better than kidney function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] alone at predicting ESKD (C-index = 0.70, 0.79, 0.82, respectively). Multivariables models did not indicate an improved prognostic value when compared with eGFR alone.When considering the 93 patients with all data available at 6 months, eGFR outperformed Berden classification and RRS (C-index = 0.88, 0.62, 0.69, respectively) to predict ESKD. RRS performed better when it was updated with the eGFR at 6 months instead of the baseline eGFR. While 6-month proteinuria was associated with ESKD and improved ESKD prediction, hematuria and serological remission did not.

Conclusion

This work suggests the benefit of the reassessment of the kidney prognosis 6 months after AAV-GN diagnosis. Kidney function at this time remains the most reliable for predicting kidney outcome. Of the markers tested, persistent proteinuria at 6 months was the only one to slightly improve the prediction of ESKD.

CKD therapy to improve outcomes of immune-mediated glomerular diseases

The management of immunoglobulin A nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, C3 glomerulonephritis, autoimmune podocytopathies and other immune-mediated glomerular disorders is focused on two major treatment goals, preventing overall mortality and the loss of kidney function. Since minimizing irreversible kidney damage best serves both goals, the management of immune-mediated kidney disorders must focus on the two central pathomechanisms of kidney function decline, i.e., controlling the underlying immune disease process (e.g. with immunotherapies) and controlling the non-immune mechanisms of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Here we review the pathophysiology of these non-immune mechanisms of CKD progression and discuss non-drug and drug interventions to attenuate CKD progression in immune-mediated kidney disorders. Non-pharmacological interventions include reducing salt intake, normalizing body weight, avoiding superimposed kidney injuries, smoking cessation and regular physical activity. Approved drug interventions include inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2. Numerous additional drugs to improve CKD care are currently being tested in clinical trials. Here we discuss how and when to use these drugs in the different clinical scenarios of immune-mediated kidney diseases.

Management of Lupus Nephritis: New Treatments and Updated Guidelines

Management of lupus nephritis has evolved considerably over the past years. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of clinical trials that form the basis for the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes and EULAR/ERA-EDTA updated guidelines and present day trials that will change the landscape of lupus nephritis therapy in years to come. In addition, we highlight the issues related to cost of therapy, resistant disease, and downstream adverse effects of specific therapies.

Repeat kidney biopsy findings of lupus nephritis patients in clinical remission treated with Mycophenolate associated with Belimumab or Mycophenolate plus standard of care therapy. A "post-hoc" analysis of participants in the BLISS-LN and open label extension study belonging to a single center

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis affects 40 to 70% of Systemic Lupus Erythematous(SLE) patients increasing their morbi-mortality; therefore, successful treatments are required to improve outcomes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE

In this paper 20 patients who participated in the BLISS LN trial at a single center (OMI) in Argentina were studied. All the patients continued Mycophenolate (MMF) treatment when the trial was finished and until a second biopsy was performed to determine the withdrawal of the immunosuppression according to the achieved clinical and histological response. Ten patients treated with MMF + Placebo versus 10 receiving MMF + Belimumab, were compared evaluating the complete clinical (CCR) and complete histological response (CHR) and the flares in each group.

RESULTS

All the patients in the Belimumab group showed a CCR and 7 in the Placebo one; CHR was found in 9 and 5 patients of the Belimumab and Placebo group, respectively. None of the patients in the Belimumab group flared meanwhile two of the Placebo one did it.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of patients is insufficient to be able to draw unquestionable conclusions, adding Belimumab to the standard of care treatment with MMF would seem to increase the possibility of achieving a CCR, CHR, and a lower rate of relapses during treatment and long follow-up.

Diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis: a summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN)

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent serious manifestation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Up to 60% of SLE patients develop LN, which has a significant impact on their quality of life and prognosis. Recent advances have improved the diagnostic approach to LN, and new drugs that block specific pathways and kidney damage progression have been developed. Several randomized and well-powered clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of these agents in terms of proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function in the medium and long term, with an acceptable safety profile and good tolerance. The combination of different therapies allows for reduction of the dose and duration of corticosteroids and other potentially toxic therapies and leads to an increase in the number of patients achieving complete remission of the disease. This consensus document carried out by the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) provides practical and updated recommendations, based on the best available evidence and clinical expertise of participating nephrologists.

Urine L-selectin reflects clinical and histological renal disease activity and treatment response in lupus nephritis across multi-ethnicity

Objective

There is an urgent need for novel biomarkers in lupus nephritis (LN). We report a non-invasive urinary biomarker, L-selectin, in two independent multi-ethnic cohorts.

Methods

uL-selectin was tested cross-sectionally in a Chinese cohort (n=255) and a US cohort (n=219) of SLE patients and controls using ELISA. A longitudinal cohort includes 20 active Chinese LN patients.

Results

uL-selectin was significantly increased in active LN patients compared to active non-renal SLE, inactive LN, inactive non-renal SLE, chronic kidney disease patients, and healthy controls. uL-selectin positively correlated with global and renal disease activities as well as histological activity index and chronicity index (CI). Low uL-selectin was an independent predictor for high CI. During follow-up, uL-selectin levels decreased significantly in the complete renal remission group.

Conclusion

uL-selectin is a novel biomarker of disease activity and renal histopathology in LN across multiple ethnicities. It also reflects treatment response in LN patients during follow up.

Weaning Maintenance Therapy in Lupus Nephritis: For Whom, When, and How?

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the main determinants of the severity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). LN flares can lead to organ damage with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or even end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and impair patients' survival. The "treat-to-target" strategy, which aims at obtaining and maintaining remission or low disease activity of SLE to alleviate symptoms and prevent organ damage, also refers to the control of residual activity in the kidney. But damage in SLE can also come from treatments, and toxicities related to long-term use of treatments should be prevented. This may contribute to the frequent nonadherence in patients with SLE. The de-escalation or even weaning of treatments whenever possible, or "think-to-untreat" (T2U) strategy, is to be considered in patients with LN. This possibility of treatment weaning in LN was explored in retrospective cohorts, on the basis of long-term clinical remission. It was also proposed prospectively with a kidney-biopsy-based approach, combining clinical and pathologic remission to secure treatment weaning. The WIN-Lupus trial was the first randomized controlled trial comparing the continuation to the discontinuation of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (IST) after 2 to 3 years in patients with LN in remission. It showed a higher risk of severe SLE flares in patients who discontinued treatment, but also a possibility of weaning without flare in some patients, who need to be better identified. We propose here a narrative review of the available literature on the weaning of treatment in LN and discuss how to secure a T2U strategy.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases

The KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases represents the first update to this set of recommendations since the initial set of KDIGO guideline recommendations was published in 2012. The pace of growth in our molecular understanding of glomerular disease has quickened and a number of newer immunosuppressive and targeted therapies have been introduced since the original set of guideline recommendations, making such an update necessary. Despite these updates, many areas of controversy remain. In addition, further updates since the publication of KDIGO 2021 have occurred which this guideline does not encompass. With this commentary, the KDOQI work group has generated a chapter-by-chapter companion opinion article that provides commentary specific to the implementation of the KDIGO 2021 guideline in the United States.

Remission of lupus nephritis: the trajectory of histological response in successfully treated patients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated changes in kidney histology over time in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) undergoing immunosuppressive treatment.

METHODS

Patients with proliferative±membranous LN were studied. After a diagnostic kidney biopsy (Bx1), patients had protocol biopsy 2 (Bx2) at 9 (6-15) months and protocol biopsy 3 (Bx3) at 42 (28-67) months. Kidney histological activity and chronicity indices (AI, CI) were measured.

RESULTS

AI declined in a biphasic fashion, falling rapidly between Bx1 and Bx2 and then more slowly between Bx2 and Bx3. Patients were divided into those who achieved histological remission, defined as an AI=0 at Bx3 (group 1), and those with persistent histological activity (AI >0) at Bx3 (group 2). The early decline in AI was 1.6 times greater (95% CI 1.30, 1.91) in group 1 than group 2 (p=0.01). Between Bx2 and Bx3, the AI decline was 2.19-fold greater (95% CI 2.09, 2.29) in group 1 versus group 2 (p=7.34×10-5). Individual histological components of the AI resolved at different rates. Inflammatory lesions like glomerular crescents, karyorrhexis and necrosis mostly resolved by Bx2, whereas endocapillary hypercellularity, subendothelial hyaline deposits and interstitial inflammation resolved slowly, accounting for residual histological activity at biopsy 3 in group 2. In contrast, CI increased rapidly, by 0.15 units/month between Bx1 and Bx2, then plateaued. There were no differences in the rate of accumulation of chronic damage between group 1 and group 2. The increase in CI was significantly related to the severity of glomerular crescents (p=0.044), subendothelial hyaline deposits (p=0.002) and interstitial inflammation (p=0.015) at Bx1.

CONCLUSIONS

LN histological activity takes months to years to resolve, providing a rationale for the need of long-term, well-tolerated maintenance immunosuppression. Despite responding, LN kidneys accrue chronic damage early during treatment. This finding provides an explanation for the association of chronic progressive kidney disease with recurrent episodes of LN.

Treatment of lupus nephritis: consensus, evidence and perspectives

Despite the continuing development of immunomodulatory agents and supportive care, the prognosis associated with lupus nephritis (LN) has not improved substantially in the past decade, with end-stage kidney disease still developing in 5-30% of patients within 10 years of LN diagnosis. Moreover, inter-ethnic variation in the tolerance of, clinical response to and level of evidence regarding various therapeutic regimens for LN has led to variation in treatment prioritization in different international recommendations. Modalities that better preserve kidney function and reduce the toxicities of concomitant glucocorticoids are unmet needs in the development of therapeutics for LN. In addition to the conventional recommended therapies for LN, there are newly approved treatments as well as investigational drugs in the pipeline, including the newer generation calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents. In view of the heterogeneity of LN in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis, the choice of therapies depends on a number of clinical considerations. Molecular profiling, gene-signature fingerprints and urine proteomic panels might enhance the accuracy of patient stratification for treatment personalization in the future.

PROTEINURIA AND HEMATURIA AFTER REMISSION INDUCTION ARE ASSOCIATED WITH OUTCOME IN ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

In anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), hematuria and proteinuria are biomarkers reflecting kidney involvement at diagnosis. Yet, the prognostic value of their persistence after immunosuppressive induction therapy, reflecting kidney damage or persistent disease, remains uncertain. To study this, our post-hoc analysis included participants of five European randomized clinical trials on AAV (MAINRITSAN, MAINRITSAN2, RITUXVAS, MYCYC, IMPROVE). Urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) and hematuria of spot urine samples collected at the end of induction therapy (four-six months after treatment initiation) were correlated with the occurrence of a combined endpoint of death and/or kidney failure, or relapses during follow-up. Among 571 patients (59% men, median age 60), 60% had anti-proteinase 3-ANCA and 35% had anti-myeloperoxidase-ANCA, while 77% had kidney involvement. After induction therapy, 157/526 (29.8%) had persistent hematuria and 165/481 (34.3%) had UPCR of 0.05 g/mmol or more. After a median follow-up of 28 months (inter quartile range 18-42), and adjustment for age, ANCA type, maintenance therapy, serum creatinine and persistent hematuria after induction, a UPCR of 0.05 g/mmol or more after induction was associated with significant risk of death/kidney failure (adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.06, 95% confidence interval (1.09-8.59) and kidney relapse (adjusted subdistribution HR 2.22, 1.16-4.24). Persistent hematuria was associated with significant kidney relapse (adjusted subdistribution HR 2.16, (1.13-4.11) but not with relapse affecting any organ nor with death/kidney failure. Thus, in this large cohort of patients with AAV, persistent proteinuria after induction therapy was associated with death/kidney failure and kidney relapse, whereas persistent hematuria was an independent predictor of kidney relapse. Hence, these parameters must be considered to assess long-term kidney prognosis of patients with AAV.

Levels of Proteinuria and Renal Pathology in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

According to the current guidelines, renal biopsies are performed in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients for proteinuria of 0.5 g/24 h or higher. Renal pathology may be present in patients with lower-level proteinuria (<0.5 g/24 h). We aimed to review the renal histopathology in SLE patients, with lower levels of proteinuria. In this retrospective study, we retrieved SLE patients' data, including 24-h urinary protein excretion and renal histopathology results. We compared various parameters in different lupus nephritis (LN) classes and in different levels of proteinuria (urinary protein <0.5 g, 0.5 to <1 g, and ≥1 g per 24 h). Out of 476 patients, 274 (57.6%) had proteinuria of <0.5 g, 44 (9.2%) had 0.5 to <1 g, and 158 (33.2%) had ≥1 g per 24 h. SLE patients with proteinuria of <0.5 g/24 h were found to have LN, including the proliferative classes. Of the 299 LN cases confirmed by a renal biopsy, low-level proteinuria (<0.5 g) was found in 39.8% of all LN patients, in 50% of patients with Class III LN, 33.3% of those with Class IV LN, 31.4% of those with Class V LN, and 41.4% of those with other LN classes (II/V, III/V, and IV/V). Overall, 35.9% (87/242) of patients with the proliferative LN classes (III, IV, V, II/V, III/V and IV/V) had low-level proteinuria of <0.5 g/24 h. SLE patients with low-level proteinuria had significant renal pathology. Our study suggests there is a need to perform renal biopsies at lower levels of proteinuria.

[Lupus nephritis: from diagnosis to treatment]

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), so-called lupus nephritis (LN), is one of the most frequent organ manifestations with an incidence of approximately 40-60%. It is not uncommon for renal involvement to be the initial manifestation of SLE or to occur in the first 5-10 years after diagnosis of SLE. Urinalysis is useful in screening for the presence of LN, demonstrating proteinuria or active sediment with acanthocytes. Histologic confirmation of LN, and thus the LN class present, is currently the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis. In addition, knowledge of the LN class is a relevant component of adequate treatment planning in SLE patients with LN. In particular, early diagnosis and rapid response to therapy are of prognostic importance for the preservation of renal function as well as morbidity and mortality of the mostly young patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Thus, the focus of therapy is to achieve complete remission, as well as to avoid active disease phases. Due to a complex pathogenesis and at the same time a very heterogeneous clinical presentation, with six different histological classes of LN, there are different therapeutic targets. This in turn results in a significant expansion of the study landscape in the field of LN with an increasing understanding of the signaling pathways and influencing factors, and fortunately in a growing armamentarium of available targeted therapy options. Simultaneously, new insights into drug therapy to inhibit progression of chronic renal disease are opening up supportive therapy options that can further improve preservation of renal function.

Comparison urine neutrophil gelatinase - associated lipocalin with standard parameters in monitoring activity Lupus nephritis: Class IV

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most serious complications in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus, that can adversely affect the course and prognosis of this autoimmune disease. Therefore, monitoring the effect of applied therapy, achieving remission, or monitoring class IV LN activity is still a great challenge for nephrologists. This study aimed to compare the urinary neutrophile gelatinase associated lipocalin (u/NGAL) with traditionally accepted parameters for LNactivity to indicate the importance of its determination in these patients.

Methods

The study group consisted of 40 patients with class IV LN, who were prospectively followed for a period of 4 months within three control visits to 2 months. The first group (20/40) had active disease (Group A), and the second group had diseasein remission (Group B). The parameters we monitored and compared at each visit were standard biochemical parameters and kidney function parameters: C-reactive protein (CRP), blood count (CBC), creatinine, total proteins, albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Regarding immune parameters, complement C3 and C4, antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double stranded DNA antibody(anti ds DNA Ab) were monitored. Urine sediment, proteinuria 24h, urine culture, urinary protein/creatinine ratio - Up/Cre, and urinary NGAL (u/NGAL) were monitored in.

Results

Comparing standard parameters of disease activity and u/NGAL between groups, a statistically significant difference was obtained (p < 0.001). Within Group A, comparing the parameters by visits (0 : 2) for anti-ds-DNA Ab a significance of p< 0.05 was obtained, for albumin/s and C3 a significance of p<0.01 was obtained, and proteinuria/24h, Up/Cre, u/NGAL had a significance of p < 0.001. The mean level of u/NGAL was elevated at the initially visit (173.25 ± 172.12 ng/mL), after two months 73.2 ± 48.7 ng/mL, and in the second visit a lower level was recorded (49.60 ± 72.57 ng/mL). The negative correlation of u/NGAL was statistically significant at initial visit with albumin/s (p< 0.01) as well as the positive correlation with proteinuria 24h and Up/Cre (p< 0.001). In visit 2 significant negative correlation of u/NGAL with albumin/s and C3 p< 0.05, and positive correlation with anti-ds-DNA Ab, proteinuria 24h and Up/Cre p < 0.001.

Conclusions

The results of our study indicate that the level of u/N GLA is elevated in patients with active Lupus nephritis class IV, as well as that it correlates with other parameters of disease activity. Serial determination of u/NGAL could be significant in monitoring disease course and treatment.

Consensus document of the Spanish Group for the Study of the Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) for the diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis

A significant number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (between 20% and 60% according to different reported series) develop lupus nephritis in the course of its evolution, which directly influences their quality of life and vital prognosis. In recent years, the greater knowledge about the pathogenesis of systemic lupus and lupus nephritis has allowed relevant advances in the diagnostic approach and treatment of these patients, achieving the development of drugs specifically aimed at blocking key pathogenic pathways of the disease. Encouragingly, these immunomodulatory agents have shown in well-powered, randomized clinical trials good clinical efficacy in the medium-term, defined as proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function, with an acceptable safety profile and good patient tolerability. All this has made it possible to reduce the use of corticosteroids and other potentially more toxic therapies, as well as to increase the use of combined therapies. The present consensus document carried out by the Glomerular Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (GLOSEN), collects in a practical and summarized, but rigorous way, the best currently available evidence about the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of lupus nephritis patients, including cases of special situations, with the main objective of providing updated information and well-founded clinical recommendations to treating physicians, to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to our patients.

Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics of Nephropathy

Years of standing still have ended, and the field of nephrology has seen a plethora of clinical trials, changing the therapeutic landscape of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immune-mediated kidney disease management [...].

High incidence of proliferative and membranous nephritis in SLE patients with low proteinuria in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership

OBJECTIVE

Delayed detection of LN associates with worse outcomes. There are conflicting recommendations regarding a threshold level of proteinuria at which biopsy will likely yield actionable management. This study addressed the association of urine protein:creatinine ratios (UPCR) with clinical characteristics and investigated the incidence of proliferative and membranous histology in patients with a UPCR between 0.5 and 1.

METHODS

A total of 275 SLE patients (113 first biopsy, 162 repeat) were enrolled in the multicentre multi-ethnic/racial Accelerating Medicines Partnership across 15 US sites at the time of a clinically indicated renal biopsy. Patients were followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

At biopsy, 54 patients had UPCR <1 and 221 had UPCR ≥1. Independent of UPCR or biopsy number, a majority (92%) of patients had class III, IV, V or mixed histology. Moreover, patients with UPCR <1 and class III, IV, V, or mixed had a median activity index of 4.5 and chronicity index of 3, yet 39% of these patients had an inactive sediment. Neither anti-dsDNA nor low complement distinguished class I or II from III, IV, V or mixed in patients with UPCR <1. Of 29 patients with baseline UPCR <1 and class III, IV, V or mixed, 23 (79%) had a UPCR <0.5 at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, three-quarters of patients with UPCR <1 had histology showing class III, IV, V or mixed with accompanying activity and chronicity despite an inactive sediment or normal serologies. These data support renal biopsy at thresholds lower than a UPCR of 1.

Lupus nephritis transcriptomics across space and time

Current immunosuppression regimens for lupus nephritis are incompletely effective, placing patients at risk for poor long-term outcomes. This emphasizes the need to dissect pathogenic mechanisms in lupus nephritis, to inform the development of targeted therapies. In this issue of Kidney International, Parikh et al. performed transcriptomic analysis of pretreatment and posttreatment protocol kidney biopsies, segregated into glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments, to identify candidate molecular pathways distinguishing treatment responders and nonresponders.

Weaning of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis (WIN-Lupus): results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Severe (proliferative) forms of LN are treated with induction immunosuppressive therapy (IST), followed by maintenance IST, to target remission and avoid relapses. The optimal duration of maintenance IST is unknown. The WIN-Lupus trial tested whether IST discontinuation after 2‒3 years was non-inferior to IST continuation for two more years in proliferative LN.

METHODS

WIN-Lupus was an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients receiving maintenance IST with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for 2-3 years, and hydroxychloroquine, were randomised (1:1) into two groups: (1) IST continuation and (2) IST discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the relapse rate of proliferative LN at 24 months. Main secondary endpoints were the rate of severe SLE flares, survival without renal relapse or severe flare, adverse events.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2016, 96 patients (out of 200 planned) were randomised in WIN-Lupus: IST continuation group (n=48), IST discontinuation group (n=48). Relapse of proliferative LN occurred in 5/40 (12.5%) patients with IST continuation and in 12/44 (27.3%) patients with IST discontinuation (difference 14.8% (95% CI -1.9 to 31.5)). Non-inferiority was not demonstrated for relapse rate; time to relapse did not differ between the groups. Severe SLE flares (renal or extrarenal) were less frequent in patients with IST continuation (5/40 vs 14/44 patients; p=0.035). Adverse events did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-inferiority of maintenance IST discontinuation after 2‒3 years was not demonstrated for renal relapse. IST discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of severe SLE flares.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01284725.

Predictors of increase in chronicity index and of kidney function impairment at repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

Based on available data, the histological predictors of long-term outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) are not clearly defined. Aims of this retrospective study were: (i) to evaluate the change of chronicity index from the first to second kidney biopsy and to find the predictors of chronicity index increase and (ii) to detect the clinical/histological features at first and at second kidney biopsy associated with long-term kidney function impairment.

METHODS

Among 203 biopsy proven LN subjects, 61 repeated kidney biopsy 49 months after the first biopsy. The reasons for repeated biopsy were: nephritic flares in 25 (41%), proteinuric flares in 21 (36%) of patients and protocol biopsy in 14 (23%) of cases.

RESULTS

During 23-year follow-up, 25 patients presented a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30%. At repeat biopsy, chronicity index increased in 44 participants (72%) and did not increase in 17 (28%). Nephritic syndrome and serum creatinine >1.6 mg/dL at presentation correlated with chronicity index increase (p=0.031, 0.027, respectively), cyclophosphamide therapy tended to protect against chronicity index increase (p=0.059). Kidney flares occurred in 53.6% of patients with vs 23.5% of those without chronicity index increase (p=0.035). Chronicity index increases of 3.5 points in patients with kidney flares vs 2 in those without flares (p=0.001). At second, but not at first kidney biopsy, two different models predicted eGFR decrease at multivariate analysis. The first included activity index >3 (OR: 3.230; p=0.013) and chronicity index >4 (OR: 2.905; p=0.010), and the second model included moderate/severe cellular/fibrocellular crescents (OR: 4.207; p=0.010) and interstitial fibrosis (OR: 2.525; p=0.025).

CONCLUSION

At second biopsy, chronicity index increased in 3/4 of participants. Its increase was predicted by kidney dysfunction at presentation and occurrence of LN flares. Kidney function impairment was predicted by both activity and chronicity index and by some of their components at repeated biopsy, but not at first biopsy.

Kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis after achieving clinical renal remission: paving the way for renal outcome assessment

The role of repeat kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis (LN) with renal remission is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess this role in a real-life scenario. This retrospective, single-centre study included 56 patients with LN diagnosed from 1998 to 2019, with an initial kidney biopsy (KB1) at the onset of LN and a second kidney biopsy (KB2) after achieving renal remission. A total of 51 (91.1%) patients were women with a median age of 29.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 23.4–40.6] at the time of LN diagnosis. KB2s were performed after 41.1 months (IQR 30.1–52.5) of KB1. At the time of KB2, complete renal response was achieved in 51 (91.1%) patients. The median activity index decreased from a baseline value of 6.5 (IQR 2.8–11) to 0 (IQR 0–2) (P < .001). The chronicity index worsened from 1 (IQR 0–2) to 2 (IQR 1–3) (P = .01). In patients with proliferative/mixed forms at KB2, the chronicity index median value increased to 3 (IQR 1.5–4), as well as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\ge $\end{document}25%, from 5.4% to 13.5%. Persistent histological active LN (activity index ≥2) was present in 11 (19.6%) KB2s. There were no differences when comparing immunological parameters between both groups (activity index ≥2 versus <2) at KB2, nor in the percentage of patients who presented renal flare. Immunosuppressive treatment was withdrawn in 35 (62.5%) patients and maintained/switched in 21 (37.5%). Afterward, new renal flare occurred in 9 patients per group (25.7% and 43%, respectively), after a median time of 39 months (IQR 6.5–55) and 7 months (IQR 6–30), respectively. There was no difference in the number of patients who developed chronic kidney disease [n = 14 (25%)] according to the treatment. In conclusion, KB2 provides valuable information to guide immunosuppressive maintenance therapy.

A Histology-Guided Approach to the Management of Patients with Lupus Nephritis: Are We There Yet?

Renal involvement is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It occurs in up to two-thirds of patients, often early during the disease course, and is the most important predictor of the morbidity and mortality of SLE patients. Despite tremendous improvements in the approach of the lupus nephritis (LN) therapy, including the recent approval of two new disease-modifying therapies, up to 50% of patients do not obtain a renal response and up to 25% will eventually progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within 10 years of diagnosis. Given the lack of correlation between clinical features and histological lesions, there is an increasing need for a histology-guided approach to the management of patients with LN. Apart from the initial diagnosis of type and severity of renal injury in SLE, the concept of a repeat kidney biopsy (either in a for-cause or a per-protocol scenario) has begun to gain increasing popularity in the nephrology community. Herein, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the most important areas of utility of the kidney biopsy in patients with LN.