Improving treatment decisions using personalized risk assessment from the International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool

Drugs in Development to Treat IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is a common glomerulonephritis consequent to the autoimmune response to aberrant glycosylated immunoglobulin (Ig) A antibodies. Although it has historically been considered a benign disease, it has since become clear that a substantial percentage of patients reach end-stage kidney failure over the years. Several therapeutic attempts have been proposed, with systemic steroids being the most prevalent, albeit burdened by possible serious adverse events. Thanks to the more in-depth knowledge of the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy, new treatment targets have been identified and new drugs developed. In this narrative review, we summarise the molecules under clinical development for the treatment of IgA nephropathy. As a search strategy, we used PubMed, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and abstracts from recent international congresses. TRF budesonide and sparsentan are the two molecules at a more advanced stage, just entering the market. Other promising agents are undergoing phase III clinical development. These include anti-APRIL and anti-BLyS/BAFF antibodies and some complement inhibitors. Other new possible strategies include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-CD40 ligands and anti-CD38 antibodies. In an era increasingly characterised by 'personalised medicine' and 'precision therapy' approaches and considering that the potential therapeutic armamentarium for IgA nephropathy will be very broad in the near future, the identification of biomarkers capable of helping the nephrologist to select the right drug for the right patient should be the focus of future studies.

New therapies for immunoglobulin A nephropathy: what's the standard of care in 2023?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the most common primary glomerulonephritis, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) is an important cause of kidney failure and mortality. Until recently, therapeutic options were limited. Fortunately, there have been numerous recent clinical trials demonstrating efficacy of new therapies in slowing chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression at varying stages of disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The TESTING trial has provided high-quality evidence for slowing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline with a reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen, while demonstrating an improved safety profile. Targeted-release budesonide represents a well tolerated therapy for reducing eGFR decline. Mycophenolate mofetil may reduce CKD progression in some populations, while hydroxychloroquine is efficacious in reducing proteinuria. Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors and sparsentan are effective therapies for CKD due to IgAN, but should not be used in lieu of disease-modifying immunosuppressive therapy. Many new therapies are approaching readiness for clinical use.

SUMMARY

Numerous therapeutic options now exist and include disease-modifying and nephroprotective drugs. Identifying the right treatment for the right patient is now the clinical challenge and, with new drugs on the horizon, represents the primary unmet research need in this rapidly-developing field.

Histological reappraisal of IgA nephropathy: the role of glomerular pattern of injury and mesangial complement deposition

BACKGROUND

There is a clear need to refine the histological assessment in IgA Nephropathy (IgAN). We sought to investigate the clinical significance of the light microscopy (LM) pattern of glomerular injury and of the intensity of mesangial C3 staining in IgAN.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study that included all patients with biopsy-proven primary IgAN that had at least 12 months of follow-up. The LM pattern of glomerular injury was reevaluated based on a modified HAAS classification. Mesangial C3 deposition by immunofluorescence (IF) staining was scored semi-quantitatively. The study primary composite endpoint was defined as doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD (dialysis, renal transplant or eGFR < 15 ml/min). The secondary study endpoint was eGFR decline per year.

RESULTS

This cohort included 214 patients with IgAN (mean age, 41.4 ± 12.6 years), with a mean eGFR and median 24-h proteinuria of 55.2 ± 31.5 ml/min/1.73m2 and 1.5 g/day (IQR:0.8-3.25), respectively. The most frequent LM pattern was the mesangioproliferative (37.4%), followed by the sclerotic (22.5%) and proliferative/necrotizing patterns (21.4%). Regarding the IF findings, mild-moderate and intense mesangial C3 staining was present in 30.6% and 61.1% of patients, respectively. Those with sclerosing and crescentic patterns had the worst renal survival (5-year renal survival of 48.8% and 42.9%) and the highest rate of eGFR change/year (-2.32 ml/min/y and - 2.16 ml/min/y, respectively) compared to those with other glomerular patterns of injury. In addition, those with intense C3 staining reached the composite endpoint more frequently compared to those without intense C3 staining (35.5% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.04). After multivariate adjustment, patients with crescentic and sclerosing patterns had a 3.6-fold and 2.1-fold higher risk for the composite endpoint compared to those with mesangioproliferative pattern, while an intense mesangial C3 deposition being also associated with a worse renal outcome (HR, 3.33; 95%CI, 1.21-9.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that the LM pattern of glomerular injury and the intensity of mesangial C3 deposition might stratify more accurately the renal outcome in patients with IgAN.

Glomerular transcriptomics predicts long term outcome and identifies therapeutic strategies for patients with assumed benign IgA nephropathy

Some patients diagnosed with benign IgA nephropathy (IgAN) develop a progressive clinical course, not predictable by known clinical or histopathological parameters. To assess if gene expression can differentiate between progressors and non-progressors with assumed benign IgAN, we tested microdissected glomeruli from archival kidney biopsy sections from adult patients with stable clinical remission (21 non-progressors) or from 15 patients that had undergone clinical progression within a 25-year time frame. Based on 1 240 differentially expressed genes from patients with suitable sequencing results, we identified eight IgAN progressor and nine non-progressor genes using a two-component classifier. These genes, including APOL5 and ZXDC, predicted disease progression with 88% accuracy, 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity on average 21.6 years before progressive disease was clinically documented. APOL lipoproteins are associated with inflammation, autophagy and kidney disease while ZXDC is a zinc-finger transcription factor modulating adaptive immunity. Ten genes from our transcriptomics data overlapped with an external genome wide association study dataset, although the gene set enrichment test was not statistically significant. We also identified 45 drug targets in the DrugBank database, including angiotensinogen, a target of sparsentan (dual antagonist of the endothelin type A receptor and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor) currently investigated for IgAN treatment. Two validation cohorts were used for substantiating key results, one by immunohistochemistry and the other by nCounter technology. Thus, glomerular mRNA sequencing from diagnostic kidney biopsies from patients with assumed benign IgAN can differentiate between future progressors and non-progressors at the time of diagnosis.

Charting new frontiers in IgA nephropathy: a paradigm shift toward precision medicine and early intervention?

Advancements in glomerular transcriptomics offer a promising avenue toward precision medicine in IgA nephropathy. Traditional prognostic biomarkers, including proteinuria, blood pressure, and histomorphometry, fall short at capturing the complexity of IgA nephropathy and can only crudely guide therapeutic decisions. This issue needs to be addressed urgently as pathway-specific treatments become available. Glomerular transcriptomics, although technically challenging, offers an opportunity to refine prognostic precision and identify therapeutic targets, even when apparent risk of disease progression is low.

Prognostic Models in Nephrology: Where Do We Stand and Where Do We Go from Here? Mapping Out the Evidence in a Scoping Review

Prognostic models can strongly support individualized care provision and well-informed shared decision making. There has been an upsurge of prognostic research in the field of nephrology, but the uptake of prognostic models in clinical practice remains limited. Therefore, we map out the research field of prognostic models for kidney patients and provide directions on how to proceed from here. We performed a scoping review of studies developing, validating, or updating a prognostic model for patients with CKD. We searched all published models in PubMed and Embase and report predicted outcomes, methodological quality, and validation and/or updating efforts. We found 602 studies, of which 30.1% concerned CKD populations, 31.6% dialysis populations, and 38.4% kidney transplantation populations. The most frequently predicted outcomes were mortality ( n =129), kidney disease progression ( n =75), and kidney graft survival ( n =54). Most studies provided discrimination measures (80.4%), but much less showed calibration results (43.4%). Of the 415 development studies, 28.0% did not perform any validation and 57.6% performed only internal validation. Moreover, only 111 models (26.7%) were externally validated either in the development study itself or in an independent external validation study. Finally, in 45.8% of development studies no useable version of the model was reported. To conclude, many prognostic models have been developed for patients with CKD, mainly for outcomes related to kidney disease progression and patient/graft survival. To bridge the gap between prediction research and kidney patient care, patient-reported outcomes, methodological rigor, complete reporting of prognostic models, external validation, updating, and impact assessment urgently need more attention.

Long-term follow-up of IgA nephropathy: clinicopathological features and predictors of outcomes

Background

The establishment of the Oxford classification and newly developed prediction models have improved the prognostic information for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Considering new treatment options, optimizing prognostic information and improving existing prediction models are favorable.

Methods

We used random forest survival analysis to select possible predictors of end-stage kidney disease among 37 candidate variables in a cohort of 232 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN retrieved from the Norwegian Kidney Biopsy Registry. The predictive value of variables with relative importance >5% was assessed using concordance statistics and the Akaike information criterion. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to identify correlations between the selected variables.

Results

The median follow-up period was 13.7 years. An isolated analysis of histological variables identified six variables with relative importance >5%: T %, segmental glomerular sclerosis without characteristics associated with other subtypes (not otherwise specified, NOS), normal glomeruli, global sclerotic glomeruli, segmental adherence and perihilar glomerular sclerosis. When histopathological and clinical variables were combined, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria and serum albumin were added to the list. T % showed a better prognostic value than tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) lesions with C-indices at 0.74 and 0.67 and was highly correlated with eGFR. Analysis of the subtypes of segmental glomerulosclerosis (S) lesions revealed that NOS and perihilar glomerular sclerosis were associated with adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Reporting T lesions as a continuous variable, normal glomeruli and subtypes of S lesions could provide clinicians with additional prognostic information and contribute to the improved performance of the Oxford classification and prognostic tools.

Long-term follow-up of an IgA nephropathy cohort: outcomes and risk factors

AIM

IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common glomerulopathy worldwide and in Uruguay, raised treatment controversies. The study aimed to analyze long-term IgAN outcomes and treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a Uruguayan IgAN cohort, enrolled between 1985 and 2009 and followed up until 2020, was performed. The Ethics Committee approved the study. The inclusion criteria were (a) biopsy-proven IgAN; (b) age ≥12 years; and (c) available clinical, histologic, and treatment data. The patients were divided into two groups, with immunosuppressive (IS) or without (NoIS) treatment. Outcomes (end-stage kidney disease/kidney replacement therapy [ESKD/KRT] or all-cause death) were obtained from mandatory national registries.

RESULTS

The study population included 241 patients (64.7% men), median age 32 (19.5) years, baseline blood pressure <130/80 mmHg in 37%, and microhematuria in 67.5% of patients. Baseline proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and a higher crescent percentage were significantly more frequent in the IS group. Proteinuria improved in both groups. Renal survival at 20 years was 74.6% without difference between groups. In the overall population and in the NoIS group, bivariate Cox regression analysis showed that baseline proteinuria, endocapillary hypercellularity, tubule interstitial damage, and crescents were associated with a higher risk of ESKD/KRT or death, but in the IS group, proteinuria and endocapillary hypercellularity were not. In the multivariate Cox analysis, proteinuria in the NoIS group, crescents in the IS group and tubule interstitial damage in both groups were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The IS group had more severe risk factors than the NoIS group but attained a similar outcome.

Evaluating Progression Risk in Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy

The highly variable rate of decline in kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) provides a major clinical challenge. Predicting which patients will progress to kidney failure, and how quickly, is difficult. Multiple novel therapies are likely to be approved in the short-term, but clinicians lack the tools to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific treatments at the right time. Noninvasive and validated markers for selecting at-risk patients and longitudinal monitoring are urgently needed. This review summarizes what is known about demographic, clinical, and histopathologic prognostic markers in the clinician's toolkit, including the International IgAN Prediction Tool. We also briefly review what is known on these topics in children and adolescents with IgAN. Although helpful, currently used markers leave clinicians heavily reliant on histologic features from the diagnostic kidney biopsy and standard clinical data to guide treatment choice, and very few noninvasive markers reflect treatment efficacy over time. Novel prognostic and predictive markers are under clinical investigation, with considerable progress being made in markers of complement activation. Other areas of research are the interplay between gut microbiota and galactose-deficient IgA1 expression; microRNAs; imaging; artificial intelligence; and markers of fibrosis. Given the rate of therapeutic advancement, the remaining gaps in biomarker research need to be addressed. We finish by describing our route to clinical utility of predictive and prognostic markers in IgAN. This route will provide us with the chance to improve IgAN prognosis by using robust, clinically practical markers to inform patient care.

Acute Oncologic Complications: Clinical-Therapeutic Management in Critical Care and Emergency Departments

Introduction. It is now known that cancer is a major public health problem; on the other hand, it is less known, or rather, often underestimated, that a significant percentage of cancer patients will experience a cancer-related emergency. These conditions, depending on the severity, may require treatment in intensive care or in the emergency departments. In addition, it is not uncommon for a tumor pathology to manifest itself directly, in the first instance, with a related emergency. The emergency unit proves to be a fundamental and central unit in the management of cancer patients. Many cancer cases are diagnosed in the first instance as a result of symptoms that lead the patient's admittance into the emergency room. Materials and Methods. This narrative review aims to analyze the impact of acute oncological cases in the emergency setting and the role of the emergency physician in their management. A search was conducted over the period January 1981-April 2023 using the main scientific platforms, including PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Embase and Google scholar, and 156 papers were analyzed. Results. To probe into the main oncological emergencies and their management in increasingly overcrowded emergency departments, we analyzed the following acute pathologies: neurological emergencies, metabolic and endocrinological emergencies, vascular emergencies, malignant effusions, neutropenic fever and anemia. Discussion/Conclusions. Our analysis found that a redefinition of the emergency department connected with the treatment of oncology patients is necessary, considering not only the treatment of the oncological disease in the strict sense, but also the comorbidities, the oncological emergencies and the palliative care setting. The need to redesign an emergency department that is able to manage acute oncological cases and end of life appears clear, especially when this turns out to be related to severe effects that cannot be managed at home with integrated home care. In conclusion, a redefinition of the paradigm appears mandatory, such as the integration between the various specialists belonging to oncological medicine and the emergency department. Therefore, our work aims to provide what can be a handbook to detect, diagnose and treat oncological emergencies, hoping for patient management in a multidisciplinary perspective, which could also lead to the regular presence of an oncologist in the emergency room.

IgA Nephropathy: Current Treatment and New Insights

IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common cause of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. Despite the histopathologic hallmark of mesangial IgA deposition, IgAN is a heterogenous autoimmune disease not only in terms of clinical presentation but also in long-term disease progression. The pathogenesis of the disease is complex and includes the generation of circulating IgA immune complexes with chemical and biological characteristics that favor mesangial deposition and reaction to mesangial under-glycosylated IgA1 accumulation, which leads to tissue injury with glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Patients with proteinuria over 1 g, hypertension, and impaired renal function at diagnosis are considered to be at high risk for disease progression and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment for these patients for years, but without long-term benefit for renal function and accompanied by several adverse events. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAN in recent years has led to the development of several new therapeutic agents. In this review, we summarize the current therapeutic approach for patients with IgAN as well as all novel investigational agents.

Corticosteroid Therapy in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND

The administration of corticosteroids in addition to supportive care to delay progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, remains controversial. This is partly due to the paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials and well-known corticosteroid-related side effects. As a result, clinical equipoise in corticosteroid therapy exists depending on geographical regions and the clinician's preference.

SUMMARY

Better understanding around the pathogenesis of IgAN has prompted several clinical trials exploring the effects of immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids. Earlier studies of corticosteroids were limited by suboptimal study designs, inadequate implementation of standard of care, and inconsistent adverse event data collection. Two well-designed, adequately powered, multi-centre randomized controlled trials, the STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies, have reported contrasting kidney outcomes that have further fuelled the clinical conundrum regarding the efficacy of corticosteroids. Both studies independently reported greater adverse events with corticosteroids. A novel targeted release formulation of budesonide, which has been hypothesized to reduce the adverse events associated with systemic corticosteroids, has shown promising results in the Phase 3 NefigaRD trial. Studies of treatments targeting B cells and the complement cascade are currently underway, and early data appear encouraging. This review provides an overview of the current literature around the understanding of the pathomechanisms and benefits and harm of corticosteroid use in IgAN.

KEY MESSAGES

Recent evidence suggests the use of corticosteroids in a selected cohort of people with IgAN at high risk of disease progression can improve kidney outcomes but comes with an associated risk of treatment-related adverse events, particularly with higher doses. Management decisions should therefore follow an informed patient-clinician discussion.

Post-hoc analysis of a tool to predict kidney failure in patients with IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Recently, a tool based on two different artificial neural networks has been developed. The first network predicts kidney failure (KF) development while the second predicts the time frame to reach this outcome. In this study, we conducted a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the discordant results obtained by the tool.

METHODS

The tool performance was analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 1116 adult IgAN patients, as were the causes of discordance between the predicted and observed cases of KF.

RESULTS

There was discordance between the predicted and observed KF in 216 IgAN patients (19.35%) all of whom were elderly, hypertensive, had high serum creatinine levels, reduced renal function and moderate or severe renal lesions. Many of these patients did not receive therapy or were non-responders to therapy. In other IgAN patients the tool predicted KF but the outcome was not reached because patients responded to therapy. Therefore, in the discordant group (prediction did not match the observed outcome) the proportion of patients having or not having KF was strongly associated with treatment (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The post-hoc analysis shows that discordance in a low number of patients is not an error, but rather the effect of positive response to therapy. Thus, the tool could both help physicians to determine the prognosis of the disease and help patients to plan for their future.

Comparison between outcomes of IgA nephropathy with nephrotic-range proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome: do podocytes play a role?

Background

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) and nephrotic-range proteinuria (NRP) are uncommon in IgA nephropathy (IgAN), and their clinicopathology and prognosis have not been discussed. Podocytes may play an important role in both clinical phenotypes.

Methods

We investigated 119 biopsy-proven IgAN patients with proteinuria over 2 g/d. The patients were divided into three groups according to proteinuria level: the overt proteinuria (OP) group, NS group, and NRP group. In addition, according to the severity of foot process effacement (FPE), the patients were divided into three groups: the segmental FPE (SFPE) group, moderate FPE (MFPE) group, and diffuse FPE (DFPE) group. The outcome was survival from a combined event defined by a doubling of the baseline serum creatinine and a 50% reduction in eGFR or ESRD.

Results

Compared with the NRP group, patients in the NS group had more severe microscopic hematuria, presented with more severe endocapillary hypercellularity and had a higher percentage of DFPE. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed that MFPE patients had a better outcome in the NRP group <50% of tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. In the multivariate model, the NRP group (HR = 17.098, 95% CI = 3.835–76.224) was associated with an increased risk of the combined event, while MFPE (HR = 0.260, 95% CI = 0.078–0.864; p = 0.028) was associated with a reduced risk of the combined event. After the addition of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), the incidence of the combined event in the MFPE group (HR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.047–0.689; p = 0.012) was further reduced.

Conclusions

NS presented more active lesions and more severe FPE in IgAN. NRP was an independent risk factor for progression to the renal endpoint, while MFPE indicated a better prognosis in NRP without obvious chronic renal lesions, which may benefit from RASi.

Heat-Related Illness in Emergency and Critical Care: Recommendations for Recognition and Management with Medico-Legal Considerations

Hyperthermia is an internal body temperature increase above 40.5 °C; normally internal body temperature is kept constant through natural homeostatic mechanisms. Heat-related illnesses occur due to exposure to high environmental temperatures in conditions in which an organism is unable to maintain adequate homeostasis. This can happen, for example, when the organism is unable to dissipate heat adequately. Heat dissipation occurs through evaporation, conduction, convection, and radiation. Heat disease exhibits a continuum of signs and symptoms ranging from minor to major clinical pictures. Minor clinical pictures include cramps, syncope, edema, tetany, and exhaustion. Major clinical pictures include heatstroke and life-threatening heat stroke and typically are expressed in the presence of an extremely high body temperature. There are also some categories of people at greater risk of developing these diseases, due to exposure in particular geographic areas (e.g., hot humid environments), to unchangeable predisposing conditions (e.g., advanced age, young age (i.e., children), diabetes, skin disease with reduced sweating), to modifiable risk factors (e.g., alcoholism, excessive exercise, infections), to partially modifiable risk factors (obesity), to certain types of professional activity (e.g., athletes, military personnel, and outdoor laborers) or to the effects of drug treatment (e.g., beta-blockers, anticholinergics, diuretics). Heat-related illness is largely preventable.

Structural modeling for Oxford histological classifications of immunoglobulin A nephropathy

In immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), Cox regression analysis can select independent prognostic variables for renal functional decline (RFD). However, the correlation of the selected histological variables with clinical and/or treatment variables is unknown, thereby making histology-based treatment decisions unreliable. We prospectively followed 946 Japanese patients with IgAN for a median of 66 mo. and applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify direct and indirect effects of histological variables on RFD as a regression line of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) via clinical variables including amount of proteinuria, eGFR, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at biopsy, and treatment variables such as steroid therapy with/without tonsillectomy (ST) and renin–angiotensin system blocker (RASB). Multi-layered correlations between the variables and RFD were identified by multivariate linear regression analysis and the model’s goodness of fit was confirmed. Only tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) had an accelerative direct effect on RFD, while endocapillary hypercellularity and active crescent (C) had an attenuating indirect effect via ST. Segmental sclerosis (S) had an attenuating indirect effect via eGFR and mesangial hypercellularity (M) had accelerative indirect effect for RFD via proteinuria. Moreover, M and C had accelerative indirect effect via proteinuria, which can be controlled by ST. However, both T and S had additional indirect accelerative effects via eGFR or MAP at biopsy, which cannot be controlled by ST. SEM identified a systemic path links between histological variables and RFD via dependent clinical and/or treatment variables. These findings lead to clinically applicable novel methodologies that can contribute to predict treatment outcomes using the Oxford classifications.

Validation of two IgA nephropathy risk-prediction tools using a cohort with a long follow-up

BACKGROUND

Recently, two immunoglobulin A nephropathy prediction tools were developed that combine clinical and histopathological parameters. The International IgAN Prediction Tool predicts the risk for 50% declines in the estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease up to 80 months after diagnosis. The IgA Nephropathy Clinical Decision Support System uses artificial neural networks to estimate the risk for end-stage renal disease. We aimed to externally validate both prediction tools using a Norwegian cohort with a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We included 306 patients with biopsy-proven primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy in this study. Histopathologic samples were retrieved from the Norwegian Kidney Biopsy Registry and reclassified according to the Oxford classification. We used discrimination and calibration as principles for externally validating the prognostic models.

RESULTS

The median patient follow-up was 17.1 years. A cumulative dynamic time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis showed area under the curve values of ranging from 0.90 at 5 years to 0.83 at 20 years for the International IgAN Prediction Tool, while time-naive analysis showed an area under the curve value at 0.83 for the IgA Nephropathy Clinical Decision Support System. The International IgAN Prediction Tool was well calibrated, while the IgA Nephropathy Clinical Decision Support System tends to underestimate risk for patients with higher risk, and overestimates risk in the lower risk categories.

CONCLUSIONS

We have externally validated two prediction tools for IgA nephropathy. The International IgAN Prediction Tool performed well, while the IgA Nephropathy Clinical Decision Support System has some limitations.

Acute glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis is a heterogeneous group of disorders that present with a combination of haematuria, proteinuria, hypertension, and reduction in kidney function to a variable degree. Acute presentation with full blown nephritic syndrome or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis is uncommon and is mainly restricted to patients with post-infectious glomerulonephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis, and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Most frequently, patients present with asymptomatic haematuria and proteinuria with or without reduced kidney function. All glomerulonephritis disorders can show periods of exacerbation, but disease flairs characteristically occur in patients with IgA nephropathy or C3 glomerulopathy. The gold standard for the diagnosis of a glomerulonephritis is a kidney biopsy, with a hallmark glomerular inflammation that translates into various histopathological patterns depending on the location and severity of the glomerular injury. Traditionally, glomerulonephritis was classified on the basis of the different histopathological patterns of injury. In the last few years, substantial progress has been made in unravelling the underlying causes and pathogenetic mechanisms of glomerulonephritis and a causal approach to the classification of glomerulonephritis is now favoured over a pattern-based approach. As such, glomerulonephritis can be broadly classified as immune-complex glomerulonephritis (including infection-related glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and cryoglobulinaemic glomerulonephritis), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated (pauci-immune) glomerulonephritis, anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis, C3 glomerulopathy, and monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated glomerulonephritis. We provide an overview of the clinical presentation, pathology, and the current therapeutic approach of the main representative disorders in the spectrum of glomerulonephritis.

Validation of the International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool in the Greek Registry of IgA Nephropathy

Background

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is among the commonest glomerulonephritides in Greece and an important cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an insidious chronic course. Thus, the recently published International IgAN prediction tool could potentially provide valuable risk stratification and guide the appropriate treatment module. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction tool using a patient cohort from the IgAN registry of the Greek Society of Nephrology.

Methods

We validated the predictive performance of the two full models (with or without race) derived from the International IgAN Prediction Tool study in the Greek Society of Nephrology registry of patients with IgAN using external validation of survival prediction models (Royston and Altman). The discrimination and calibration of the models were tested using the C-statistics and stratified analysis, coefficient of determination (RD2) for model fit, and the regression coefficient of the linear predictor (β_PI), respectively.

Results

The study included 264 patients with a median age of 39 (30–51) years where 65.2% are men. All patients were of Caucasian origin. The 5-year risk of the primary outcome (50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate or ESKD) was 8%. The RD2 for the full models with and without race when applied to our cohort was 39 and 35%, respectively, and both were higher than the reported RD2 for the models applied to the original validation cohorts (26.3, 25.3, and 35.3%, respectively). Harrel's C statistic for the full model with race was 0.71, and for the model without race was 0.70. Renal survival curves in the subgroups (<16th, ~16 to <50th, ~50 to <84th, and >84th percentiles of linear predictor) showed adequate separation. However, the calibration proved not to be acceptable for both the models, and the risk probability was overestimated by the model.

Conclusions

The two full models with or without race were shown to accurately distinguish the highest and higher risk patients from patients with low and intermediate risk for disease progression in the Greek registry of IgAN.

Utilizing the MEST score for prognostic staging in IgA nephropathy

Background

The Oxford classification/MEST score is an established histopathologic scoring system for patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). The objective of this study was to derive a prognostic model for IgAN based on the MEST score and histopathologic features.

Methods

A total of 306 patients with biopsy-proven primary IgAN were included. Histopathologic samples were retrieved from the Norwegian Kidney Biopsy Registry and reclassified according to the Oxford classification. The study endpoint was end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Patients were subclassified into three risk models based on histologic features (Model A), a composite score calculated from the adjusted hazard ratio values (Model B), and on quartiles (Model C).

Results

The mean follow-up time was 16.5 years (range 0.2–28.1). In total, 61 (20%) patients reached ESRD during the study period. Univariate analysis of M, E, S, T and C lesions demonstrated that all types were associated with an increased risk of ESRD; however, a multivariate analysis revealed that only S, T and C lesions were associated with poor outcomes. Statistical analysis of 15-year data demonstrated that Models A and B were as predictive as the MEST score, with an area-under-the-curve at 0.85. The Harrel c index values were 0.81 and 0.80 for the MEST score and Models A and B, respectively. In the present cohort, adding C lesions to the MEST score did not improve the models prognostic value.

Conclusions

Patients can be divided into risk classes based on their MEST scores. Histopathologic data provide valuable prognostic information at the time of diagnosis. Model B was the most suitable for clinical practice because it was the most user-friendly.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02653-y.

Oxidative stress and macrophage infiltration in IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interactions among serum levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), oxidative stress and macrophage infiltration and their clinical correlates in patients with IgA Nephropathy (IgAN).

METHODS

A total of 47 patients with biopsy-proven primary IgAN, aged between 16 and 79 years, with a follow-up period ≥ 1 year or who showed progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD) regardless the duration of follow-up were included. Study endpoint was the progression to ESKD. Serum Gd-IgA1 and advanced oxidation protein product (AOPP) levels were measured using ELISA assays. Kidney biopsies were evaluated according to the Oxford MEST-C scoring, with C4d and CD68 staining.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (36%) experienced ESKD during a median follow-up time of 6 years (IQR 3.7-7.5). Serum AOPP levels were correlated with the intensity of glomerular C3 deposition (r = 0.325, p = 0.026), glomerular (r = 0.423, p = 0.003) and interstitial CD68 + cell count (r = 0.298, p = 0.042) and Gd-IgA1 levels (r = 0.289, p = 0.049). Serum Gd-IgA1 levels were correlated with the intensity of C3 deposition (r = 0.447, p = 0.002). eGFR at biopsy (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.979 p = 0.011), and E score (aHR, 8.305, p = 0.001) were associated with progression to ESKD in multivariate analysis. 5-year ESKD-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with higher E score compared to patients with E score 0 [p = 0.021].

CONCLUSIONS

An increased number of macrophages in the glomerular and tubulointerstitial area may play a role in oxidative stress and complement system activation. Endocapillary hypercellularity is a predictive factor for poor prognosis in IgAN.

IgA Nephropathy: A Chinese Perspective

Background

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease worldwide and remains a leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. The disease prevalence, clinical and pathological phenotypes, the underlying pathogenic molecular mechanisms, and the response to treatments are highly heterogeneous in different ethnic populations, which raise the concern that IgAN may differ across different parts of the world.

Summary

From a Chinese perspective, we stated the disease burden of IgAN, summarized genome-wide association studies and research into pathological molecules, and compared them with findings based on other populations. The emerging biomarkers, indigenous clinical trials, and major challenges for Chinese researchers and nephrologists in studying IgAN are also discussed.

Key Messages

In this review, we described a higher risk of major susceptible loci in mucosal immunity, IgA production, and complement activation pathways in Chinese patients with IgAN. With our understanding of the pathogenesis of IgAN, novel biomarkers are emerging. Although there are challenges for conducting high-quality clinical trials in China, it is still feasible to conduct innovative and well-designed studies of IgAN. In the future, international collaborations on research infrastructure would be helpful to advance clinical and basic research in China.

IgA vasculitis nephritis in children and adults: one or different entities?

The clinical features of the kidney involvement in immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis (IgAVN) differ in children and adults for both clinical presentation and progression. IgAVN in children has mostly a self-limiting course and favorable resolution, while in adults the kidney involvement is frequently severe with unfavorable outcome. However, a subset of children is at risk of progression within the pediatric age or decades later in adulthood, particularly when the diagnosis and a prompt intervention are delayed. Factors predicting progression and outcome in the whole spectrum of age have been investigated in recent research, as well as the relationship between IgAVN and primary IgAN, which share the same pathology features, in the light of peculiar clinical differences and progression tendencies, and hence need for selective treatments. The search for a personalized treatment in children with IgAV and in different ages of life should rely on the identification of different risks for progression. This review will focus on recent studies which contribute to improve our knowledge in this still largely unclear area.

Precision medicine in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: still a journey ahead

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease worldwide and since its first description extensive research has identified a number of key central pathogenetic contributors, including genetic, immunological and environmental factors. Along with its multifaceted pathophysiology, the clinical presentation of IgAN varies, ranging from mild forms with only minor urinary findings and preserved renal function to cases that rapidly progress to end-stage renal disease. Because of this, early identification of patients at risk for a progressive course is urgently needed. The search for valid and easily accessible biomarkers showed urinary Dickkopf-3 as a promising candidate to predict the course of kidney function. In addition, a recently established IgAN risk prediction tool derived from an international cohort of IgAN patients allows estimation of the risk of a 50% loss of kidney function over several years upon diagnosis. This might serve as a significant tool to individually predict the course of renal function by combining biometric, clinical, histological and treatment information at the time of diagnosis. Today there is no doubt that a comprehensive supportive treatment regimen is the main pillar for all IgAN patients. The value of an additional immunosuppressive treatment in IgAN patients at risk for disease progression is less clear. Early risk stratification and individualized therapies would be desirable for IgAN patients to facilitate the choice of treatment strategies, which is still a matter of ongoing discussion.

Measurement of galactosyl-deficient IgA1 by the monoclonal antibody KM55 contributes to predicting patients with IgA nephropathy with high risk of long-term progression

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

About 25% of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) progress to stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) after years of evolution. Various tools have been developed in recent years designed to predict which of the patients will had poorer outcomes. The value of circulating galactosyl-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) has been related to a worse evolution of IgAN in several studies. There are also some publications that relate higher APRIL values with a worse evolution. Recently, a new method has been developed that allows measuring the value of circulating Gd-IgA1 in a simpler way than those previously available. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of circulating Gd-IgA1, measured by this method, on the progression of IgAN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with a diagnosis of IgAN demonstrated by renal biopsy were selected in our center, without having received prior immunosuppressive treatment, for whom frozen serum was available. The median follow-up was 4 years. Gd-IgA1 was measured by lectin-independent ELISA with the monoclonal antibody KM55 (IgA1 kit Cat. No. 30111694. IBL Int., Hamburg, Germany). Likewise, APRIL levels were also measured in these patients.

RESULTS

19 (38.8%) patients reached stage 5 CKD. The fourth quartile of circulating Gd-IgA1 was related to a higher cumulative risk of reaching stage 5 CKD in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (risk at the 5th year 39.4% vs. 24.3%, log rank p=0.019). The Gd-IgA1 value was related to an increased risk of CKD stage 5 (HR 1.147, 95% CI 1.035-1.270, p=0.009), regardless of glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, the percentage of sclerosed glomeruli and the value of segmental sclerosis. We did not find significant differences in the APRIL values.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of circulating Gd-IgA1 measured by the monoclonal antibody KM55 is related to a worse evolution of patients with IgAN independently of other variables, so it could be included in the study of patients to improve the prediction of the risk of disease progression.

IgA Nephropathy: "The Times They Are a-Changin"

Background

Primary IgA Nephropathy (IgA N) is a very common and often progressive glomerular disease. At present, the diagnosis of IgA N is totally dependent on kidney biopsy, but the prospect for a future diagnosis by means of a "liquid" biopsy is promising. A great deal is now understood regarding its diverse clinical and pathological features as well as its epidemiology, genetics, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Treatment approaches are now on increasingly solid evidence-based grounds, but many uncertainties continue to be devil the field. Better means of categorization of patients into a hierarchy of progression risk at the time of diagnosis will undoubtedly refine and personalize treatment decisions.

Summary

The panorama of treatment strategies is undergoing a rapid transformation, largely due to an increase in large randomized clinical trials testing available agents and novel therapeutic classes. It is anticipated that the combination of better prognostic tools and new strategies for treatment of IgA N will alter the landscape of therapeutic algorithms for patients with IgA N.

Key Messages

This review seeks to describe some of the evolutionary changes in the approach to treatment of IgA N, to place them in the context of current management, and to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed.

How will artificial intelligence and bioinformatics change our understanding of IgA Nephropathy in the next decade?

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerulonephritis. It is characterized by the deposition of immune complexes containing immunoglobulin A (IgA) in the kidney’s glomeruli, triggering an inflammatory process. In many patients, the disease has a progressive course, eventually leading to end-stage kidney disease. The current understanding of IgAN’s pathophysiology is incomplete, with the involvement of several potential players, including the mucosal immune system, the complement system, and the microbiome. Dissecting this complex pathophysiology requires an integrated analysis across molecular, cellular, and organ scales. Such data can be obtained by employing emerging technologies, including single-cell sequencing, next-generation sequencing, proteomics, and complex imaging approaches. These techniques generate complex “big data,” requiring advanced computational methods for their analyses and interpretation. Here, we introduce such methods, focusing on the broad areas of bioinformatics and artificial intelligence and discuss how they can advance our understanding of IgAN and ultimately improve patient care. The close integration of advanced experimental and computational technologies with medical and clinical expertise is essential to improve our understanding of human diseases. We argue that IgAN is a paradigmatic disease to demonstrate the value of such a multidisciplinary approach.

[Measurement of galactosyl-deficient IgA1 by the monoclonal antibody KM55 contributes to predicting patients with IgA nephropathy with high risk of long-term progression]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

About 25% of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) progress to stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) after years of evolution. Various tools have been developed in recent years designed to predict which of the patients will had poorer outcomes. The value of circulating galactosyl-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) has been related to a worse evolution of IgAN in several studies. There are also some publications that relate higher APRIL values with a worse evolution. Recently, a new method has been developed that allows measuring the value of circulating Gd-IgA1 in a simpler way than those previously available. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of circulating Gd-IgA1, measured by this method, on the progression of IgAN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with a diagnosis of IgAN demonstrated by renal biopsy were selected in our center, without having received prior immunosuppressive treatment, for whom frozen serum was available. The median follow-up was 4 years. Gd-IgA1 was measured by lectin-independent ELISA with the monoclonal antibody KM55 (IgA1 kit Cat. No. 30111694. IBL Int., Hamburg, Germany). Likewise, APRIL levels were also measured in these patients.

RESULTS

19 (38.8%) patients reached stage 5 CKD. The fourth quartile of circulating Gd-IgA1 was related to a higher cumulative risk of reaching stage 5 CKD in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (risk at the 5th year 39.4% vs. 24.3%, log rank p=0.019). The Gd-IgA1 value was related to an increased risk of CKD stage 5 (HR 1.147, 95% CI 1.035-1.270, p=0.009), regardless of glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, the percentage of sclerosed glomeruli and the value of segmental sclerosis. We did not find significant differences in the APRIL values.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of circulating Gd-IgA1 measured by the monoclonal antibody KM55 is related to a worse evolution of patients with IgAN independently of other variables, so it could be included in the study of patients to improve the prediction of the risk of disease progression.

Emerging Modes of Treatment of IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is the most common primary glomerulonephritis with potentially serious outcome leading to end stage renal disease in 30 to 50% of patients within 20 to 30 years. Renal biopsy, which might be associated with risks of complications (bleeding and others), still remains the only reliable diagnostic tool for IgA nephropathy. Therefore, the search for non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic markers for detection of subclinical types of IgA nephropathy, evaluation of disease activity, and assessment of treatment effectiveness, is of utmost importance. In this review, we summarize treatment options for patients with IgA nephropathy including the drugs currently under evaluation in randomized control trials. An early initiation of immunosupressive regimens in patients with IgA nephropathy at risk of progression should result in the slowing down of the progression of renal function to end stage renal disease.

External Validation of International Risk-Prediction Models of IgA Nephropathy in an Asian-Caucasian Cohort

Introduction

Two prediction models for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) using clinical variables and the Oxford MEST scores were developed and validated in 2 multiethnic cohorts. Additional external validation is required.

Methods

Biopsy-proven Chinese and Argentinian patients with IgAN were included. The primary outcome was defined as a 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease. C-statistics and stratified analyses were used for model discrimination, coefficient of determination (R²_D) for model fit, and calibration plots for model calibration. Baseline survival function was also evaluated.

Results

A total of 1275 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 34 (interquartile range: 27–42) years, 50% of whom (638 of 1275) were men. Use of renin-angiotensin system blockers was higher than in previously reported cohorts, whereas other variables were comparable. The C-statistic of the models was 0.81, and R²_D was higher than reported. Survival curves in the subgroups (<16th, ∼16th to <50th, ∼50th to <84th, and ≥84th percentiles of linear predictor) were well separated. Most of the predictor variables, including hazard ratio, predicted 5-year risk, and eGFR decline slope, were worse with risk increasing. The baseline survival function was comparable in our cohort and the reported cohorts. The calibration was acceptable for the full model without race. However, the risk probability over 3 years was overestimated in the full model with race included.

Conclusion

The prediction models showed good performance on personalized risk assessment, which may be used as drug-specific, precision-medicine approaches to treatment decisionmaking.