1
|
Zainal Abidin NA, Ramlee MH, Ab Rashid AM, Ng BW, Gan HS, Abdul Kadir MR. Biomechanical effects of cross-pin's diameter in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament - A specific case study via finite element analysis. Injury 2022; 53:2424-2436. [PMID: 35641332 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
For anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), one of the crucial aspects of treatment is the fixator selection that could provide initial graft fixation post-operatively. Literature on biomechanical stabilities of different sizes of fixators as femoral graft fixation is limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the influence of different diameters of cross-pins on the stability of graft fixations after ACL-R via finite element analysis (FEA). In the methodology, three-dimensional (3D) models of three different diameters of cross-pins were developed, of which anterior tibial loads (ATL) were applied onto the tibia. From the findings, the cross-pin with a smaller diameter (4 mm) provided optimum stability than larger diameter cross-pins, whereby it demonstrated acceptable stresses at the fixators (both cross-pin and interference screw) with a different percentage of 28%, while the stresses at the corresponding bones were favourable for osseointegration to occur. Besides, the strains of the knee joint with 4 mm diameter cross-pin were also superior in providing a good biomechanical environment for bone healing, while the recorded strain values at fixators were comparable with a larger diameter of cross-pins without being inferior in terms of deformation. To conclude, the cross-pin with 4 mm diameter depicted the best biomechanical aspects in graft fixation for ACL-R since it allows better assistance for the osseointegration process and can minimise the possibility of the breakage and migration of fixators. This study is not only useful for medical surgeons to justify their choices of pin diameter to treat patients, but also for researchers to conduct future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Afikah Zainal Abidin
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Research Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pakar Kanak-Kanak, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Muhammad Hanif Ramlee
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Research Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pakar Kanak-Kanak, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Amir Mustakim Ab Rashid
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Research Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pakar Kanak-Kanak, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Bing Wui Ng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pakar Kanak-Kanak, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Hong Seng Gan
- Department of Data Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 16100 UMK City Campus, Pengkalan Chepa, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Research Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Sports Innovation and Technology Centre (SITC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ammann E, Hecker A, Bachmann E, Snedeker JG, Fucentese SF. Evaluation of Tibial Fixation Devices for Quadrupled Hamstring ACL Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221096107. [PMID: 35592018 PMCID: PMC9112421 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221096107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Shortcomings to tibial-side fixation have been reported as causes of failure
after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Adjustable-loop suspensory
devices have become popular; however, no comparison with hybrid fixation
(ie, interference screw and cortical button) exists to our knowledge. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of
adjustable loop devices (ALDs) in full-tunnel and closed-socket
configurations in relation to hybrid fixation. We hypothesized that primary
stability of fixation by a tibial ALD will not be inferior to hybrid
fixation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Tibial fixation of a quadrupled tendon graft was biomechanically investigated
in a porcine tibia–bovine tendon model using 5 techniques (n = 6 specimens
each). The tested constructs included hybrid fixation with a cortical
fixation button and interference screw (group 1), single cortical fixation
with the full-tunnel technique using an open-suture strand button (group 2)
or an ALD (group 3), or closed-socket fixation using 2 different types of
ALDs (groups 4 and 5). Each specimen was evaluated using a materials testing
machine (1000 cycles from 50-250 N and pull to failure). Force at failure,
cyclic displacement, stiffness, and ability to pretension the graft during
insertion were compared among the groups. Results: No differences in ultimate load to failure were found between the ALD
constructs (groups 3, 4, and 5) and hybrid fixation (group 1). Cyclic
displacement was significantly higher in group 2 vs all other groups
(P < .001); however, no difference was observed in
groups 3, 4, and 5 as compared with group 1. The remaining tension on the
construct after fixation was significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 vs
groups 1, 2, and 5 (P < .02 for all comparisons),
irrespective of whether a full-tunnel or closed-socket approach was
used. Conclusion: Tibial anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation with knotless ALDs achieved
comparable results with hybrid fixation in the full-tunnel and closed-socket
techniques. The retention of graft tension appears to be biomechanically
more relevant than tunnel type. Clinical Relevance: The study findings emphasize the importance of the tension at which fixation
is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Ammann
- Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhimani R, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K, Erfani A, Ashkani-Esfahani S. Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:734. [PMID: 34949188 PMCID: PMC8705139 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transportal (TP) and all-inside techniques (AIT) are the most commonly used anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures in current clinical practice. However, there is an ongoing debate over which procedure is superior. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of these two techniques to propose recommendations for future application. Our primary hypothesis was that AIT is a superior ACLR technique compared to TP. Methods A systematic literature review, using PRISMA guidelines, was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, up to February 2021 to identify studies focusing on AIT and TP techniques of ACL reconstruction. We excluded animal experiments, cadaveric studies, retrospective studies, case reports, technical notes, and studies without quantitative data. Patients’ characteristics, surgical technical features, along with postoperative follow-up and complications were extracted and reported accordingly. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results A total of 44 studies were selected for this review, of which four were comparative studies. A total of 923 patients underwent AIT and 1678 patients underwent the TP technique for ACLR. A single semitendinosus graft was commonly used in the AIT compard to combined semitendinosus and gracilis graft in the TP group. The postoperative increase in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, KT-1000, and Short Form-12 (physical and mental) scores were similar in the AIT group and the TP group. Contrastingly, the VAS pain score was significantly lower in the AIT group compared to the TP group. Furthermore, the pooled complication rates from all studies were similar between the two groups (AIT: 54 patients, 8.26% vs. PT: 55 patients, 6.62%). However, the four studies that prospectively compared AIT and TP techniques showed lesser complications in the AIT group than the TP group. Conclusion Since the future trend in orthopedic surgery is toward less invasive and patients’ satisfaction with good outcomes, AIT is a good alternative method considering preserving bony tissue and gracilis tendon with less post-operative pain, along with more knee flexor strength and equal outcomes compared to conventional ACL reconstruction surgery. Level of Evidence II. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Bhimani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Reza Shahriarirad
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.,Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Keivan Ranjbar
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.,Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Erfani
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran. .,Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garcés GL, Martel O, Yánez A, Manchado-Herrera I, Motta LM. In Vitro Testing of 2 Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Systems Versus Interference Screw for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211031652. [PMID: 35146030 PMCID: PMC8821986 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211031652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is not clear whether the mechanical strength of adjustable-loop suspension devices (ALDs) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is device dependent and if these constructs are different from those of an interference screw. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical differences of 2 types of ALDs versus an interference screw. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: ACL reconstruction was performed on porcine femurs and bovine extensor tendons with 3 types of fixation devices: interference screw, UltraButton (UB) ALD, and TightRope (TR) ALD (n = 10 for each). In addition to specimen testing, isolated testing of the 2 ALDs was performed. The loading protocol consisted of 3 stages: preload (static 150 N load for 5 minutes), cyclic load (50-250 N at 1 Hz for 1000 cycles), and load to failure (crosshead speed 50 mm/min). Displacement at different cycles, ultimate failure load, yield load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded. Results: In specimen testing, displacement of the ALDs at the 1000th cycle was similar (3.42 ± 1.34 mm for TR and 3.39 ± 0.92 mm for UB), but both were significantly lower than that of the interference screw (7.54 ± 3.18 mm) (P < .001 for both). The yield load of the UB (547 ± 173 N) was higher than that of the TR (420 ± 72 N) (P = .033) or the interference screw (386 ± 51 N; P = .013), with no significant difference between the latter 2. In isolated device testing, the ultimate failure load of the TR (862 ± 64 N) was significantly lower than that of the UB (1879 ± 126 N) (P < .001). Conclusion: Both ALDs showed significantly less displacement in cyclic loading at ultimate failure than the interference screw. The yield load of the UB was significantly higher than that of the other 2. The ultimate failure occurred at a significantly higher load for UB than it did for TR in isolated device testing. Clinical Relevance: Both UB and TR provided stronger fixation than an interference screw. Although difficult to assess, intrinsic differences in the mechanical properties of these ALDs may affect clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardo L. Garcés
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Oscar Martel
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Alejandro Yánez
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Luci M. Motta
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zainal Abidin NA, Abdul Wahab AH, Abdul Rahim RA, Abdul Kadir MR, Ramlee MH. Biomechanical analysis of three different types of fixators for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via finite element method: a patient-specific study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2021; 59:1945-1960. [PMID: 34392448 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02419-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Complication rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) were reported to be around 15% although it is a common arthroscopic procedure with good outcomes. Breakage and migration of fixators are still possible even months after surgery. A fixator with optimum stability can minimise those two complications. Factors that affect the stability of a fixator are its configuration, material, and design. Thus, this paper aims to analyse the biomechanical effects of different types of fixators (cross-pin, interference screw, and cortical button) towards the stability of the knee joint after ACL-R. In this study, finite element modelling and analyses of a knee joint attached with double semitendinosus graft and fixators were carried out. Mimics and 3-Matic softwares were used in the development of the knee joint models. Meanwhile, the graft and fixators were designed by using SolidWorks software. Once the meshes of all models were finished in 3-Matic, simulation of the configurations was done using MSC Marc Mentat software. A 100-N anterior tibial load was applied onto the tibia to simulate the anterior drawer test. Based on the findings, cross-pin was found to have optimum stability in terms of stress and strain at the femoral fixation site for better treatment of ACL-R.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Afikah Zainal Abidin
- Medical Devices & Technology Centre (MEDiTEC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.,Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab
- Centre for Multimodal Signal Processing, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Tunku Abdul Rahman Universiti College, Jalan Genting Kelang, 53300, Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Tunku Abdul Rahman Universiti College, Jalan Genting Kelang, 53300, Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Rabiatul Adibah Abdul Rahim
- Medical Devices & Technology Centre (MEDiTEC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.,Sports Innovation and Technology Centre (SITC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Muhammad Hanif Ramlee
- Medical Devices & Technology Centre (MEDiTEC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia. .,Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Group, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith PA, Bradley JP, Konicek J, Bley JA, Wijdicks CA. Independent Suture Tape Internal Brace Reinforcement of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts: Biomechanical Assessment in a Full-ACL Reconstruction Laboratory Model. J Knee Surg 2020; 33:1047-1054. [PMID: 31269528 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Internal bracing for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is a relatively new concept. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an "independent" button-fixed internal brace on the biomechanical properties of ACL reconstruction in a full-construct experimental model. Three groups (n = 10 each) were tested in a full-construct porcine-bone model with human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts using different reconstruction techniques: interference screw fixation on femur and tibia (S-S group), adjustable-loop device (ALD) fixation on the femur with tibial interference screw without suture tape (ALD-S group), and with internal brace (ALD-S-IB group). Measured outcomes included cyclic displacement, stiffness, and ultimate load to failure. The ALD-S-IB group (2.9 ± 0.8 mm) displaced significantly less than the ALD-S (4.2 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.015) and S-S group (4.3 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.017). No significant difference was found between the ALD-S and the S-S group. Construct stiffness was significantly higher for the ALD-S-IB group (156 ± 23 N/mm) and the ALD-S group (122 ± 28 N/mm) than for the S-S group (104 ± 40 N/mm; p = 0.003 and p = 0.0042), but there was no significant difference between both ALD groups. Similarly, ultimate loads in the ALD-S-IB (758 ± 128 N) and the ALD-S groups (628 ± 223 N) were significantly greater than in the S-S group (416 ± 167 N; p < 0.001 and p = 0.025), but there was no significant difference between ALD groups. Adding an internal brace reinforcement to an ALD in a full-construct experimental model significantly decreased cyclic displacement by 31% without increasing construct stiffness or ultimate load significantly. These results indicate that suture tape internal bracing of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft ACL reconstruction decreases cyclic displacement during experimental testing, which has clinical implications regarding initial construct stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick A Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - James P Bradley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John Konicek
- Department of Research and Development, Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida
| | - Jordan A Bley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Coen A Wijdicks
- Department of Research and Development, Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
ABIDIN NURAFIKAHZAINAL, KADIR MOHAMMEDRAFIQABDUL, RAMLEE MUHAMMADHANIF. BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF CROSS-PINS IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. J MECH MED BIOL 2020. [DOI: 10.1142/s0219519420500475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Complication rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) were reported to be around 15%. Although it is a very common arthroscopic surgery with good outcomes, breakage and migration of fixators are still possible to occur due to stability issue. One of the factors that affects the mechanical stability of fixators is its length. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to analyze the biomechanical effects of different lengths of fixators (cross-pin technique) towards the stabilities of the knee joint after ACL-R. Finite element analyses of knee joint with DST grafts and fixators were carried out. Mimics and 3-Matic were used in the development of knee joint models, while the grafts and fixators were designed by using SolidWorks software. All models were remeshed in the 3-Matic and numerical analysis was performed via MSC.Marc Mentat software. A 100 N anterior tibial load was applied onto the tibia to simulate the anterior drawer test after the surgery and proximal femur was fixed at all degrees of freedom. Based on the findings, cross-pin with 40[Formula: see text]mm in length provided the most favorable option for better treatment of ACL-R, where it could promote osseointegration and preventing fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NUR AFIKAH ZAINAL ABIDIN
- Medical Devices & Technology Centre (MEDiTEC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering Group (BIOINSPIRA), Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - MOHAMMED RAFIQ ABDUL KADIR
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering Group (BIOINSPIRA), Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
- Sports Innovation and Technology Centre (SITC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - MUHAMMAD HANIF RAMLEE
- Medical Devices & Technology Centre (MEDiTEC), Institute of Human Centered Engineering (iHumEn), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
- Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering Group (BIOINSPIRA), Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hurvitz AP, Prentice HA, Funahashi TT, Maletis GB. Screw and Sheath Tibial Fixation Associated With a Higher Likelihood of Deep Infection After Hamstring Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:806-811. [PMID: 32049567 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520902716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) have exhibited higher infection rates compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. The reason for this observed difference is unclear, warranting investigation. PURPOSE To evaluate the association between tibial fixation, either with or without a sheath and screw construct, and the risk of deep infection after hamstring autograft ACLR, using BPTB autograft as a reference group for comparison. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Using the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry, we identified all primary isolated, unilateral, single-bundle ACLRs with a BPTB or hamstring autograft (January 1, 2008, to September 30, 2016). The exposure groups included the following: (1) BPTB ACLR, (2) hamstring ACLR using a screw and sheath construct for tibial fixation (HS with screw and sheath), and (3) hamstring ACLR using a method other than a screw and sheath construct for tibial fixation (HS without screw and sheath). We used logistic regression to evaluate the likelihood of 90-day postoperative deep infection using BPTB autograft as the reference group and adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. The number needed to be exposed (NNE) was calculated. RESULTS Of 15,671 ACLRs, 6745 (43.0%) used a BPTB graft, 2852 (18.2%) used HS with screw and sheath tibial fixation, and 6074 (38.8%) used HS without screw and sheath tibial fixation. There were 38 (0.2%) 90-day deep infections: 11 (0.2%) for BPTB, 14 (0.5%) for HS with screw and sheath, and 13 (0.2%) for HS without screw and sheath. Staphylococcus aureus for the BPTB group and Staphylococcus epidermidis in both hamstring groups were the most common infecting organisms. HS with screw and sheath had a higher likelihood of 90-day deep infection compared with BPTB ACLR (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; 95% CI, 1.29-6.38). We failed to observe a difference for HS without screw and sheath compared with BPTB ACLR (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.54-2.77). The NNE was 330 and 2701 for HS with and HS without screw and sheath, respectively. CONCLUSION Although the overall infection rate after ACLR is low, the higher likelihood of infections when sheath and screw combined are used for tibial fixation of a hamstring autograft ACLR should be a consideration when this procedure is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Hurvitz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Heather A Prentice
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Tadashi T Funahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Gregory B Maletis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bachmaier S, DiFelice GS, Sonnery-Cottet B, Douoguih WA, Smith PA, Pace LJ, Ritter D, Wijdicks CA. Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears-Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967119897421. [PMID: 32064293 PMCID: PMC6990615 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119897421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), with fixation techniques evolving. However, to date, there have been no biomechanical studies comparing fixed to adjustable fixation repair techniques. Hypothesis: Adjustable ACL repair provides for improved stabilization compared with fixed techniques with respect to both gap formation and residual load-bearing capability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 4 different ACL repair techniques (n = 5 per group), including single– and double–cinch loop (CL) cortical button fixation as well as knotless single–suture anchor fixation, were tested using a porcine model. For adjustable single-CL loop fixation, additional preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) was performed. The force after fixation and the actuator displacement to achieve a time-zero preload of 10 N were measured for fixed techniques. Incrementally increasing cycling (1 mm/500 cycles) from 1 to 8 mm was performed for 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz before pull to failure (50 mm/min). The final residual peak load and gap formation for each test block were analyzed as well as ultimate strength. Results: Knot tying of a single-CL over a button (mean ± SD, 0.66 ± 0.23 mm) and knotless anchor fixation (0.20 ± 0.12 mm) resulted in significant time-zero gaps (P < .001) and significantly higher overall gap formation at reduced residual loading (analysis of covariance, P < .001) compared with both the double-CL loop and adjustable fixation techniques. The adjustable group showed the highest failure load and stiffness, at 305.7 N and 117.1 N/mm, respectively. The failure load of the knotted single-CL group was significantly reduced compared with all other groups (P < .001). Conclusion: Adjustable single-CL cortical button fixation with intraoperative preconditioning optimized time-zero ACL tension and led to significantly improved stabilization and reduced gap formation, with the highest ultimate strength. Single-CL loop knot tying over the button and knotless anchor fixation resulted in time-zero gaps to achieve slight tension on the ACL and significantly higher gap formation at reduced load-bearing capability. Clinical Relevance: Although the clinical relevance of gap formation is uncertain, a biomechanical understanding of the stabilization potential of current ACL repair techniques is pertinent to the continued evolution of surgical approaches to enable better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Wiemi A Douoguih
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Lee J Pace
- Connecticut Children's Specialty Group, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniel Ritter
- Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Whitaker S, Edwards JH, Guy S, Ingham E, Herbert A. Stratifying the mechanical performance of a decellularized xenogeneic tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as a function of graft diameter: An animal study. Bone Joint Res 2019; 8:518-525. [PMID: 31832171 PMCID: PMC6888738 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.811.bjr-2019-0065.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study investigated the biomechanical performance of decellularized porcine superflexor tendon (pSFT) grafts of varying diameters when utilized in conjunction with contemporary ACL graft fixation systems. This aimed to produce a range of ‘off-the-shelf’ products with predictable mechanical performance, depending on the individual requirements of the patient. Methods Decellularized pSFTs were prepared to create double-bundle grafts of 7 mm, 8 mm, and 9 mm diameter. Femoral and tibial fixation systems were simulated utilizing Arthrex suspension devices and interference screws in bovine bone, respectively. Dynamic stiffness and creep were measured, followed by ramp to failure from which linear stiffness and load at failure were measured. The mechanisms of failure were also recorded. Results Dynamic stiffness was found to increase with greater graft diameter, with significant differences between all groups. Conversely, dynamic creep reduced with increasing graft diameter with significant differences between the 7 mm and 9 mm groups and the 8 mm and 9 mm groups. Significant differences were also found between the 7 mm, 8 mm, and 9 mm groups for linear stiffness, but no significant differences were found between groups for load at failure. The distribution of failure mechanisms was found to change with graft diameter. Conclusion This study showed that decellularized pSFTs demonstrate comparable biomechanical properties to other ACL graft options and are a potentially viable option for ACL reconstruction. Although grafts can be stratified by their diameter to provide varying biomechanical properties, it may be more appropriate to alter the fixation technique to stratify for a greater diversity of biomechanical requirements. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;8:518–525.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer H Edwards
- Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen Guy
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Eileen Ingham
- Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony Herbert
- Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Late Migration of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Case Rep Orthop 2019; 2019:1061385. [PMID: 31531256 PMCID: PMC6721472 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1061385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A unique case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button utilized during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presented. Imaging and physical examinations during the patient's postoperative course were unremarkable for graft or hardware failure. Two years postoperatively, symptomatic hardware migration occurred requiring arthroscopic removal. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button in ACL reconstruction. This case highlights that late loosening and migration of adjustable-loop femoral fixation devices in ACL reconstruction can occur despite demonstrated postoperative radiographic and clinical stability. Surgeons utilizing this fixation device should be aware of this potential complication to avoid delayed recognition and patient morbidity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Glasbrenner J, Domnick C, Raschke MJ, Willinghöfer T, Kittl C, Michel P, Wähnert D, Herbort M. Adjustable buttons for ACL graft cortical fixation partially fail with cyclic loading and unloading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:2530-2536. [PMID: 30368561 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite good initial pullout strength, it is unclear whether adjustable button (AB) devices for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) soft-tissue graft fixation, which are based on the Chinese finger trap technique, resist cyclic loading. Furthermore, they have never been tested in a cyclic protocol including complete unloading. It was hypothesized, that the displacement of AB devices with the Chinese finger trap technique would be greater than that of continuous suture loop devices and other available AB mechanisms in a cyclic loading with complete unloading protocol. METHODS ACL reconstruction was performed in a porcine knee model using three different types of cortical fixation devices: two different AB devices that use the Chinese finger trap design, one AB device that uses a locked suture loop mechanism and two different continuous loop devices as control groups (n = 40). Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine (Instron Inc.) that permitted 2500 loading and complete unloading cycles to a maximum of 250 N, as well as continuous elongation recording. A one-way ANOVA was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS The displacement of ABs with a Chinese finger trap loop (mean 8.1; SD 1.5 mm and mean 6.1; SD 1.4 mm) was significantly greater than that of AB with a locked suture loop (mean 4.7; SD 1.0 mm; p < 0.05) and devices with a continuous loop (mean 4.1; SD 0.5 mm and mean 4.4, SD 0.3 mm; p < 0.01). No significant differences were detected between the ABs with a locked suture loop and the continuous loops. CONCLUSION Cyclic loading and unloading of AB using the Chinese finger trap technique leads to significantly greater construct lengthening compared with other devices. Complete unloading of the ACL is very likely to occur during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Lengthening of the AB device due to cyclic loading might be a potential mode of failure of the ACL graft fixation. Therefore, when using an AB femoral fixation technique, a locked suture loop design or a careful rehabilitation protocol should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Glasbrenner
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - C Domnick
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - M J Raschke
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - T Willinghöfer
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - C Kittl
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - P Michel
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - D Wähnert
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - Mirco Herbort
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms University, Waldeyer Strasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:2577-2584. [PMID: 30406408 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5275-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical outcomes and tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with an all-inside technique (Group A) or with a bioabsorbable tibial screw and suspensory femoral fixation (Group B). METHODS Tunnel widening was assessed using computed tomography (CT) and a previously validated analytical best fit cylinder technique at approximately 1-year following ACLR. Clinical follow-up comprised evaluation with IKDC, KSS, Tegner, Lysholm scores, and knee laxity assessment. RESULTS The study population comprised 22 patients in each group with a median clinical follow-up of 24 months (range 21-27 months). The median duration between ACLR and CT was 13 months (range 12-14 months). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures between groups. There were no differences between groups with respect to femoral tunnel widening. However, there was a significantly larger increase in tibial tunnel widening, at the middle portion, in Group B (2.4 ± 1.5 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.4 mm) (p = 0.027), and also at the articular portion in Group B (1.5 ± 0.8 mm) compared to Group A (0.8 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION Tibial tunnel widening after ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft is significantly greater with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw when compared to an all-inside technique at a median follow-up of 2 years. The clinical relevance of this work lies in the rebuttal of concerns arising from biomechanical studies regarding the possibility of increased tunnel widening with an all-inside technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
14
|
Marsh NA, Antosh IJ, O'Conor DK, Ortega RJ, Paneral NS, Cameron KL, Posner M. Tibial Interference Screw Positioning Relative to the Bone Plug in ACL Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Cortical Versus Cancellous-Sided Placement. Orthopedics 2018; 41:337-342. [PMID: 30125040 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180815-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The biomechanical strength of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in the tibia may vary depending on whether the interference screw abuts the cancellous vs the cortical surface of the bone plug. In a porcine model, 10×20-mm bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts were prepared and fixed in a 10-mm diameter tibial tunnel using a 9×25-mm titanium interference screw. The screw was positioned on the cancellous surface of the graft in group A (n=13) vs the cortical side of the graft in group B (n=14). Specimens underwent precycling, cyclic loading, and load-to-failure testing. The mean ultimate failure load was 493±245 N for group A vs 304±145 N for group B (P=.008). Sixty-nine percent of specimens in group A survived 1000 cycles of load testing compared with 21% of specimens in group B. Forty-three percent of specimens in group B sustained intratendinous failure adjacent to the bone plug compared with 15% of specimens in group A. Orientation of the tibial interference screw along the cancellous vs the cortical side of the graft results in superior cyclic loading and ultimate failure load characteristics. Additionally, screw placement along the cortical side may weaken the tendon interface and lead to tendon failure under load. This study indicates that placement of the tibial interference screw along the cancellous side of the graft is biomechanically favorable. However, the clinical ramifications of these findings are not clear. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):337-342.].
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith PA, Piepenbrink M, Smith SK, Bachmaier S, Bedi A, Wijdicks CA. Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique-Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6:2325967118768743. [PMID: 29780843 PMCID: PMC5954336 DOI: 10.1177/2325967118768743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Femoral suspensory fixation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved from fixed- to adjustable-loop devices. However, there are still controversies regarding undesired lengthening of adjustable-loop devices. Hypothesis Adjustable-loop fixation will achieve similar elongation to that of fixed-loop devices, and intraoperative preconditioning will reduce initial elongation for adjustable-loop constructs. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Three adjustable-loop devices (GraftMax, TightRope, and Ultrabutton) and 2 fixed-loop devices (Endobutton and RetroButton) were used in an intraoperative surgical technique workflow according to an in vitro model with porcine bone and bovine tendons (8 specimens per device; N = 40 constructs tested). Each construct underwent 1000 cycles of position- and force-controlled dynamic loading, whereby a total elongation threshold of 3 mm was defined as clinical failure. Constructs were finally pulled to failure at 50 mm/min. Results There were no statistically significant differences among the devices for total or dynamic elongation. Total elongation (mean ± SD) for adjustable-loop constructs was 4.13 ± 1.46 mm for GraftMax, 2.78 ± 0.85 mm for TightRope, and 2.76 ± 0.45 mm for Ultrabutton; for the fixed-loop devices, total elongation was 2.85 ± 0.74 mm for Endobutton and 2.85 ± 1.03 mm for RetroButton. The GraftMax had a significantly lower initial force (95.5 ± 58.0 N) after retensioning, with the highest initial elongation (0.99 ± 0.60 mm). The Ultrabutton showed the greatest force loss (-105.9 ± 13.5 N) during position control cycling, which was significantly different from the GraftMax (-22.3 ± 28.2 N), with the smallest force loss (P < .001). The TightRope construct had a significantly smaller initial elongation (-0.36 ± 0.22 mm) and the greatest pull-to-failure load (958 ± 40 N) as compared with all of the other devices. Conclusion Adjustable- and fixed-loop configurations achieved statistically comparable fixation strength for total elongation. However, the GraftMax construct exceeded the total elongation threshold of clinical failure. The Ultrabutton produced the greatest loss of force during position control cycling, and the GraftMax button design prevented proper retensioning. The TightRope had a significant greater ultimate strength when compared with all other devices. Clinical Relevance Biomechanical testing according to a surgical technique workflow suggests that adjustable-loop devices can be considered a safe alternative to fixed-loop devices in ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick A Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Shelby K Smith
- Department of Research and Development, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Samuel Bachmaier
- Department of Research and Development, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Asheesh Bedi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Coen A Wijdicks
- Department of Research and Development, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|