Clinical outcomes of knee joint distraction combined with marrow stimulation procedures for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Mechanical Characteristics of Two Knee Distraction Devices With Relevance for Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

Distraction treatment for severe osteoarthritis below the age of 65 successfully postpones arthroplasty. Most patients have been treated with a general external fixator or a device specifically intended for knee distraction. This study compares clinical efficacy of both devices in retrospect and their mechanical characteristics.

DESIGN

Clinical efficacy 2 years posttreatment was compared using retrospective data from patients with severe knee osteoarthritis treated with knee distraction; 63 with the Dynamic Monotube (Stryker GmbH, Switzerland) and 65 with the KneeReviver (ArthroSave BV, the Netherlands). Changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, stiffness, and function, general well-being (SF-36), cartilage thickness by radiographic joint space widening, and adverse events during treatment were assessed. Axial stiffness of clinically feasible configurations was assessed by bench testing for the Dynamic Monotube triax system and the KneeReviver.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in clinical efficacy, nor in mechanical characteristics and adverse events between the two devices. Although with large variation, both showed a clinically relevant improvement. In mechanical testing, contact between articular surfaces was observed for both devices at physiological loading. Stiffness of applied configurations strongly varied and primarily depended on bone pin length.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with a general intended-use device or a distraction-specific device both experienced clinical and structural efficacy although with significant variation between patients. The latter may be the result of varying mechanical characteristics resulting from differences in clinical configurations of the devices and actual loading. The exact role of full/partial mechanical unloading of the joint during distraction treatment remains unclear.

Joint distraction using a purpose-built device for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Knee distraction treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis successfully postpones arthroplasty for years. Studies performed thus far used general intended use, patient-personalised or custom-made devices. In this study, for the first time, a device specifically designed for knee distraction is evaluated.

DESIGN

65 patients (≤65 years) with end-stage knee osteoarthritis indicated for arthroplasty received knee distraction. Before, 1-year and 2-year post-treatment, questionnaires were filled out and knee radiographs made. Adverse events and self-reported pain medication were registered.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients completed 2-year follow-up: one patient did not complete treatment, three patients received arthroplasty in the first and four patients in the second year follow-up. Eight patients were lost to follow-up in the second year. The total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed a clinically relevant improvement at 1 and 2 years (+26 and +24 points), as did all subscales (all p<0.001). The minimum radiographic joint space width improved over 1 (+0.5 mm; p<0.001) and 2 (+0.4 mm; p=0.015) years, as did the physical Short-Form 36 (+10 points; p<0.001). The most common adverse event was pin tract infection, experienced by 66% of patients, in 88% successfully treated with oral antibiotics. In two cases, hospitalisation and/or intravenous antibiotics were needed. Eight patients experienced device-related complications. None of the complications influenced 2-year outcomes. Before treatment, 42% of patients used pain medication, which had nearly been halved 1 (23%; p=0.02) and 2 years (29%; p=0.27) post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with a general applicable, for knee distraction purpose-built device showed, despite adverse events, significant clinical and structural improvement over 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL7986.

Artificial Intelligence in osteoarthritis: repair by knee joint distraction shows association of pain, radiographic and immunologic outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Knee joint distraction (KJD) has been associated with clinical and structural improvement and synovial fluid (SF) marker changes. The current objective was to analyze radiographic changes after KJD using an automatic AI-based measurement method, and relate these to clinical outcome and SF markers.

METHODS

20 knee osteoarthritis patients were treated with KJD in regular care. Radiographs and WOMAC were collected before and ∼1-year post-treatment. SF was aspirated before, during, and after treatment; biomarker levels were assessed by immunoassay. Radiographs were analyzed to obtain compartmental minimum and standardized joint space width (JSW), Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades, compartmental joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, and osteophytosis and sclerosis scores. Results were analyzed for the most (MAC) and least affected compartment. Radiographic changes were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests for categorical and paired t-test for continuous variables. Linear regression was used to calculate associations between changes in JSW, WOMAC pain, and SF markers.

RESULTS

16 Patients could be evaluated. JSW, KL and JSN improved in around half of the patients, significant only for MAC JSW (p< 0.05). MAC JSW change was positively associated with WOMAC pain change (p< 0.04). Greater MCP-1 and lower TGFβ-1 increases were significantly associated with changes in MAC JSW (p< 0.05). MCP-1 changes were positively associated with WOMAC pain changes (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Automatic radiographic measurements show improved joint structure in most patients after KJD in regular care. MAC JSW increased significantly and was associated with SF biomarker level changes and even with improvements in pain as experienced by these patients.