How does asymmetric tibial insert affect tibiofemoral kinematics and contact stresses in total knee Arthroplasty?

Does Cruciate Ligament Substitution and Implant Asymmetry Make a Difference for Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

BACKGROUND

The non-implanted knee differs in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs, with regard to asymmetry and functionality of the anterior cruciate ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament. While surgeons may choose to implant either posterior stabilized (PS) or bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKAs, substituting for one or both cruciate ligaments, the effects of symmetry versus asymmetry in substituting TKA designs have not been widely analyzed to determine possible benefits. Therefore, the objective of this research study was to determine if either TKA asymmetry and/or anterior ligament stabilization can lead to more normal-like kinematics and clinical benefit for patients.

METHODS

In vivo, femoro-tibial kinematics for 64 subjects were evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a normal, nonimplanted knee, 20 had a BCS TKA, and 34 had one of two different PS TKAs. All three TKAs had varying degrees of symmetry incorporated into the design, and all were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend.

RESULTS

At full extension, the BCS TKA subjects demonstrated a statistically more anterior position of both condyles compared to both PS TKAs. The BCS TKA subjects also experienced more posterior femoral rollback (PFR) and axial rotation in early flexion and from full extension to maximum knee flexion. Additionally, the TKAs in this study having asymmetry experienced greater amounts of PFR and weight-bearing knee flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study indicated that in early flexion, the anterior cam/post mechanism does pull the femoral component more anterior, and all TKAs experienced PFR when the posterior cam engaged the post. The asymmetric designs also achieved greater rollback and axial rotation compared to the symmetric designs.

Exploring consistent ratios in morphometry of the proximal tibia: insights for knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The current study, which delves into proximal tibia morphometric parameters in a Greek sample, not only analyzes whether specific linear distance ratios are consistent but also paves the way for a potential novel metric system for knee arthroplasty imaging studies using constant ratios. These findings could have significant implications for future enlarged research and clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 38 dried tibiae were evaluated by two independent investigators. The following distances were measured with a digital Vernier sliding caliper: (1) the mediolateral distance of the proximal surface (A), (2) the anteroposterior distance of the proximal surface (B), (3) The longitudinal length of the bone (C), (4) the line connecting the anterior margin of the proximal surface with the highest peak of the tibia tuberosity (D), (5) the depth of the proximal margin of the medial articular facet (AF) (medial plateau) (E) and (6) the depth of the proximal margin of the lateral AF (lateral plateau) (F).

RESULTS

The A, B, C, D, E, and F mean distances were 71.3 mm, 47.4 mm, 340.2 mm, 37.1 mm, 42 mm, and 35.9 mm. Reliability analysis for each observer on all measurements revealed an interclass correlation (ICC) score of 0.975 (observer 1) and 0.971 (observer 2). The ratio A/B was 1.5, A/C was a constant 0.2, and D/C was 0.1. The ratio E/F was 1.2. The six measurements (A-F) showed excellent inter-observer reliability (all ICC values > 0.990).

CONCLUSIONS

The study established constant ratios of the studied linear distances around the proximal tibia. Considering these ratios, asymmetrical tibial components in knee arthroplasty seem to replicate the native anatomy more closely. Furthermore, the distance from the anterior margin of the proximal surface to the tibial tuberosity peak, constituting one-tenth of the longitudinal length of the tibia, shows promise as a metric system for imaging studies, especially in assessing lesions around tibial components.

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics.

METHODS

In vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend.

RESULTS

At full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.