Association between health literacy, communication and psychological distress among myelodysplastic syndromes patients

The validity of the distress thermometer in patients with musculoskeletal tumors

Background

Visits to an outpatient cancer clinic represent a challenging situation for patients, which can trigger anxiety and helplessness in those affected. It is important to identify patients with high psychological distress as early as possible in order to provide them with supportive psychological interventions. The aim of this study was to validate the Distress Thermometer (DT), a widely used screening for distress, in a cohort of patients with musculoskeletal tumors and to explore associations between distress, treatment satisfaction and health literacy.

Methods

All patients presenting to a University outpatient clinic for musculoskeletal cancers were asked to complete a set of questionnaires including the DT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a comparison scale, the Patient Satisfaction with Comprehensive Cancer Care (SCCC) and European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16).To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the DT in a cohort of patients with musculoskeletal tumors, we compare the performance of the DT in relation to an established screener for anxiety and depression using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses.

Results

A total of 120 patients (age 58 ± 18, 51% female) were analyzed. Patients reported a mean DT of 5.0 (SD 2.3, range, 0 to 10). Eighty-six patients (71.7 %) had a DT score ≥ 5 indicating moderate or severe psychological distress.The mean total HADS score (scale 0 to42 points) was 11.7 (SD 7.6, range, 0 to 32) with a HADS score of ≥ 15 in 29.2% of patients. The DT correlated moderately with anxiety and depression (HADS total r = 0.48, p < 0.001), while the correlation with depression (HADS-D, r = 0.47, p < 0.001) was stronger than with anxiety (HADS-A, r = 0.38, p < 0.001).For a DT score ≥ 5, ROC analysis yielded a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 75.3% for detecting moderate or severe psychological distress (HADS ≥ 15, AUC 0.782).The REPERES-G, collected from a subgroup (n = 49), showed high treatment satisfaction with a median score of 132 (min 90, max 163). Especially the "satisfaction with medical aspects of treatment" (REPERES-G medical aspects) showed a moderate correlation with the DT (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) a strong correlation with anxiety and depression (HADS total, r = 0.69, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

About three in four patients with musculoskeletal tumors have relevant psychological distress. A visual analogue scale can only be a rough guide for identifying patients in need of psychological support, with a sensitivity of 71.4 % and a specificity of 75.3 %. A strong relationship between patient and care team was associated with lower patient psychological distress.Consequently, screening tools cannot replace detailed discussion and personal contact, especially in the treatment of malignant diseases.

Ascertaining QUAZARs: slow-motion and light-speed development of oral azacitidine and decitabine

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are devastating diseases that frequently rely on the use of parenteral hypomethylating agents (HMAs), either as monotherapy or in combination, as first-line treatment for many patients. Two new oral HMAs, decitabine/cedazuridine (DC) for use in place of azacitidine or decitabine in MDS, and azacitidine (CC-486) for use as maintenance treatment in AML, were recently approved by the FDA. We will discuss the development of these oral HMAs, including the advantages/disadvantages in transitioning to oral HMAs and an in depth look at the pivotal phase III trials that led to their FDA approval - ASCERTAIN for DC and QUAZAR-AML-001 for CC-486. We also review how these agents have been and are being studied in other malignancies, and examine the future role that these exciting novel agents will play in both MDS and AML.

Patient and Caregiver Insights into the Disease Burden of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

A diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is typically unexpected and can be difficult for patients to grasp. Not only is MDS a complicated disease to understand, which can contribute to stress and anxiety, but it also has an uncertain prognosis, which can be emotionally paralyzing. Not surprisingly, emotional distress and the symptom burden of MDS, including extreme fatigue due to cytopenias, negatively impact a patient’s quality of life (QOL). Studies have shown that patient-centered care—including greater physician understanding of the disease burden their patients experience, discussing and establishing agreed-on treatment goals, and including patients in the decision-making process about their care—may help improve patient QOL. To better understand patient and caregiver experiences with MDS and how the disease impacts QOL, a small survey was conducted of patients with MDS or leukemia and their caregivers on an online health network. Among the 30 respondents who completed the survey, four had MDS and one was a caregiver for a patient with MDS. Here we focus on the five MDS respondents and contextualize the findings with personal experiences from a patient and physician perspective. The patient perspective was provided by John Soper, PhD, DABCC, who was diagnosed with MDS in 2019. Dr Soper is a retired board-certified clinical chemist and a member of the MDS Foundation. The physician perspective was provided by Dr Ruben Mesa, Executive Director of the Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson. The survey responses and the accompanying patient and physician perspectives highlight the importance of open communication between patients and their healthcare provider to better serve those with MDS and improve their QOL.

Patient-Physician Communication in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Introduction:

An effective communication is an integral part of the patient-physician relationship. Lack of a healthy patient-physician relationship leads to a lower level of patient satisfaction, scarce understanding of interventions and poor adherence to treatment regimes. Patients need to be involved in the therapeutic process and the assessment of risks and perspectives of the illness in order to better evaluate their options. Physicians, in turn, must convey and communicate information clearly in order to avoid misunderstandings and consequently poor medical care. The patient-physician relationship in cancer care is extremely delicate due to the complexity of the disease. In cancer diagnosis, the physician must adopt a communicative approach that considers the psychosocial factors, needs and patient’s preferences for information,which in turn all contribute to affect clinical outcomes.

Search Strategy and Methods :

This review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies on the importance of physician-patient communication in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome care. We searched PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, Google scholar for studies published from December 1 ^st , 2020 up to March 1 ^st , 2021. Using MeSH headings, we search for the terms “Physician and patient communication AND Acute Myeloid leukemia” or “Myelodysplastic syndrome” or “Doctor” or “Clinician”, as well as variations thereof .

Purpose of the Review :

This review examines the progress in communication research between patient and physician and focuses on the impact of communication styles on patient-physician relationshipin hematologic cancers, including Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Self-Care Efficacy-Mediated Associations Between Healthcare Provider-Patient Communication and Psychological Distress Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers

BACKGROUND

Both healthcare provider-patient communication and self-care efficacy affect psychological distress, which is prevalent among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. It is essential to explore the underlying mechanism among them to relieve psychological distress.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether self-care efficacy mediated the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress among patients with GI cancers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2018 and May 2019 in China. In total, 219 patients with GI cancers were recruited before discharge from chemotherapy. Healthcare provider-patient communication was assessed by the revised Physician-Patient Communication Scale; patient self-care efficacy was assessed by the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health; and psychological distress was assessed by the Distress Thermometer and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine the mediating effect of self-care efficacy on the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress.

RESULTS

A total of 54.34% of patients experienced psychological distress. Patients reported a mean score of 89.93 (SD, 13.81) for healthcare provider-patient communication and 93.91 (SD, 23.39) for self-care efficacy. Self-care efficacy completely mediated the association between healthcare provider-patient communication and psychological distress, and communication outcome was the only domain that significantly influenced self-care efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Psychological distress is prevalent among patients with GI cancers. Healthcare provider-patient communication, especially communication outcome, promoted patients' self-care efficacy to reduce psychological distress.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Healthcare providers should design interventions to improve communication outcomes and eventually increase self-care efficacy to relieve psychological distress among patients with GI cancers.

What is the Prevalence of Low Health Literacy in European Union Member States? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that low health literacy (HL) is associated with several adverse outcomes. In this study, we systematically reviewed the prevalence of low HL in Europe.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Cross-sectional studies conducted in the European Union (EU), published from 2000, investigating the prevalence of low HL in adults using a reliable tool, were included. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inverse-variance random effects methods were used to produce pooled prevalence estimates. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the association between low HL and the characteristics of the studies.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of low HL ranged from of 27% (95% CI: 18-38%) to 48% (95% CI: 41-55%), depending on the literacy assessment method applied. Southern, Western, and Eastern EU countries had lower HL compared to northern Europe (β: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.40-1.35; β: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.25-0.93; and β: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.06-1.37, respectively). The assessment method significantly influenced the pooled estimate: compared to word recognition items, using self-reported comprehensions items (β: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.15-1.08), reading or numeracy comprehensions items (β: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.24-1.31), or a mixed method (β: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.01-1.33) found higher rates of low HL. Refugees had the lowest HL (β: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.26-2.92). Finally, lower quality studies reported higher rates of low HL (β: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06-1.07).

DISCUSSION

We found that low HL is a public health challenge throughout Europe, where one in every three to almost one in every two Europeans may not be able to understand essential health-related material. Additional research is needed to investigate the underlying causes and to develop remedies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42019133377.

Using the Brief Health Literacy Screen in Chronic Care in French Hospital Settings: Content Validity of Patient and Healthcare Professional Reports

Person-centered care has led healthcare professionals (HCPs) to be more attentive to patients' ability to understand and apply health-related information, especially those with chronic conditions. The concept of health literacy (HL) is essential in understanding patients' needs in routine care, but its measurement is still controversial, and few tools are validated in French. We therefore considered the brief health literacy screen (BHLS) for assessing patient-reported HL in chronic care settings, and also developed an HCP-reported version of the BHLS with the aim of using it as a research instrument to assess HCPs' evaluation of patients' HL levels. We assessed the content validity of the French translation of both the patient-reported and HCP-reported BHLS in chronic care within hospital settings, through cognitive interviews with patients and HCPs. We performed qualitative analysis on interview data using the survey response Tourangeau model. Our results show that the BHLS is easy and quick to administer, but some terms need to be adapted to the French chronic care settings. Health-related information was observed to be mainly communicated orally, hence a useful direction for future literacy measures would be to also address verbal HL.

Exploring Family Caregiver Communication Difficulties and Caregiver Quality of Life and Anxiety

BACKGROUND

When family caregivers are involved in patient care, both patients and caregivers experience better clinical outcomes. However, caregivers experience communication difficulties as they navigate a complex health care system and interact with health care providers. Research indicates that caregivers experience a communication burden that can result in topic avoidance and distress; however, little is known about how burden stemming from communication difficulties with health care providers relates to caregiving outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate how family caregiver communication difficulties with health care providers influence caregiver quality of life and anxiety.

METHODS

Data were collected in a cross-sectional online survey of 220 caregivers with communication difficulties resulting from caregiver avoidance of caregiving-related topics, inadequate reading and question-asking health literacy, and low communication self-efficacy.

RESULTS

Caregiver outcomes were not affected by reading health literacy level but did differ based on question-asking health literacy level. Adequate question-asking health literacy was associated with lower anxiety and a higher quality of life. Caregivers who avoided discussing caregiving topics reported higher anxiety and lower quality of life and caregivers with increased communication self-efficacy reported a higher quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Involvement of family caregivers in care is likely to require tailored approaches that address caregiver communication and health literacy skills. Findings from this study suggest that hospice and palliative care providers should identify and provide support for caregiver communication difficulties in order to positively influence caregiver quality of life and anxiety.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with decreased survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. However, few studies have assessed the association between socioeconomic parameters and prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and these report conflicting results. Our monocentric study assessed the impact of socioeconomic deprivation using the validated EPICES (Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centers) score in a prospective cohort of intensively treated AML patients.

METHODS

EPICES questionnaires were given to patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML at the Paoli Calmettes Institute between July 2012 and December 2014. Study participants were categorized as non-deprived (score <30.17), deprived (score 30.17-48.51), or very-deprived (score ≥ 48.52). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). The independence of EPICES score effects was analyzed via Cox regression with adjustment for confounding factors.

RESULTS

209 AML patients received the questionnaire, 149 (71.3 %) patients responded. The median EPICES score was 23.6; 26.8 % and 10.1 % of patients were deprived and very deprived, respectively. OS was 23.16 months (95 %CI [17.15-33.31]). According to multivariate analysis, a very-deprived EPICES score, European Leukemia Net categories, age, smoking, and the absence of allogeneic stem cell transplantation were independent factors associated with decreased OS.

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore the importance of integrating nonbiological factors in the prognostic stratification of AML patients. The very deprived population exhibited worse OS, confirming that socioeconomic parameters play a role in patient outcomes in AML. Very deprived patients with AML should receive specific attention and adapted clinical management.