Pretreatment whole blood Epstein-Barr virus DNA predicts prognosis in Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma: the role of EBV plasma viral load testing in an HIV-endemic setting

South Africa has a high burden of human immune deficiency virus (HIV)-associated Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) which is typically Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infected, detected by histological stains. Circulating plasma EBV derived from apoptotic EBV infected tumour cells is a potential biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the role of plasma EBV load testing in newly diagnosed HL patients and correlate pretreatment plasma EBV levels, HIV status and EBV tumour status with overall survival (OS). Untreated HL patients were prospectively included. Polymerase chain reaction measured EBV plasma viral loads. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests estimated the impact of HIV, EBV tumour status and plasma EBV viral loads on OS. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Receiver operative characteristic curve analysis determined cutoff plasma EBV DNA levels with optimal sensitivity, specificity and concordance with tumour EBV status. The 68 patients included 21 (31%) HIV +ve and 33 (49%) EBV tumour +ve. EBV plasma ≥ 10 000 IU/ml (P = 0.008), EBV +ve tumour (P = 0.014), HIV +ve status (P = 0.009) and age ≥ 45 years (P = 0.018) predicted poorer OS on univariate analysis. Plasma EBV levels > 762 IU/ml had 89.29% sensitivity and 96.77% specificity for detecting EBV +ve HL. High plasma EBV levels ≥ 10 000 IU/ml, HIV +ve status and EBV tumour +ve status predicted poorer OS. Plasma EBV levels > 762 IU/ml predicted EBV +ve tumour status with high sensitivity and specificity. Plasma EBV viral DNA testing is a promising biomarker for EBV +ve HL.

Dynamic changes in circulating EBV-DNA load during treatment have prognostic values in EBV+ DLBCL-NOS: a Chinese cohort study

EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (EBV+ DLBCL-NOS), is an EBV-positive clonal B-cell lymphoid proliferation and circulating EBV-DNA is a great indicator for prognosis among EBV associated disease. In this retrospective study, we report 66 EBV+ DLBCL cases among 2137 DLBCL-NOS cases diagnosed from 2013 to 2021 (prevalence of 6.0%). After a median follow-up of 27 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 39.5% ± 6.2% and 53.6% ± 6.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only the biomarker of the positivity of post treatment EBV-DNA had a borderline correlation with shorter PFS and OS (PFS: P = 0.053; OS: P = 0.065). Patients were divided into three subgroups according to dynamic changes of EBV-DNA status: EBV-DNA persistently negative group, EBV-DNA persistently positive group, and EBV-DNA transformed from positive to negative group; among the three groups, patients of the persistently positive group had worst PFS and OS (P = 0.0527 and P = 0.0139, respectively). Decline in EBV copies correlated significantly with treatment response as well. In conclusion, circulating EBV-DNA level played a vital role in prognostic and monitoring marker for EBV+ DLBCL-NOS.

Virological Markers in Epstein–Barr Virus-Associated Diseases

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is an oncogenic virus infecting more than 95% of the world’s population. After primary infection—responsible for infectious mononucleosis in young adults—the virus persists lifelong in the infected host, especially in memory B cells. Viral persistence is usually without clinical consequences, although it can lead to EBV-associated cancers such as lymphoma or carcinoma. Recent reports also suggest a link between EBV infection and multiple sclerosis. In the absence of vaccines, research efforts have focused on virological markers applicable in clinical practice for the management of patients with EBV-associated diseases. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an EBV-associated malignancy for which serological and molecular markers are widely used in clinical practice. Measuring blood EBV DNA load is additionally, useful for preventing lymphoproliferative disorders in transplant patients, with this marker also being explored in various other EBV-associated lymphomas. New technologies based on next-generation sequencing offer the opportunity to explore other biomarkers such as the EBV DNA methylome, strain diversity, or viral miRNA. Here, we review the clinical utility of different virological markers in EBV-associated diseases. Indeed, evaluating existing or new markers in EBV-associated malignancies or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases triggered by EBV infection continues to be a challenge.

The prognostic value of Epstein-Barr virus infection in Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) contributes significantly to the development and occurrence of B-cell lymphomas. However, the association between EBV infection status and clinical outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients has long been controversial. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prognostic significance of EBV infection in HL survival.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant cohort studies from the date of their inception to February 20, 2022. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), Failure-free survival (FFS), Progression-free survival (PFS), Event-free survival (EFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were extracted from the studies or calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted independently on the five survival outcomes to investigate the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 42 qualified studies involving 9570 patients were identified in our meta-analysis. There was an association between EBV positivity and significantly poorer OS (HR=1.443, 95% CI: 1.250-1.666) and DSS (HR=2.312, 95% CI: 1.799-2.972). However, the presence of EBV in HL showed no effect on FFS, PFS or EFS. In subgroup analyses of OS, DSS and FFS stratified by age groups, EBV positivity was associated with poorer prognosis in elderly patients. Meanwhile, in children and adolescents with EBV-positive HL, we also observed a trend toward a better prognosis, though the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

EBV-positive status is associated with poor OS and DSS in HL patients. EBV infection should therefore be considered a valuable prognostic marker and risk-stratifying factor in HL, especially in older patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022328708.

Utility of Epstein-Barr Viral Load in Blood for Diagnosis and Predicting Prognosis of Lymphoma: A Comparison with Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded RNA in Situ Hybridization

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that persists in a small portion of B cells after primary infection and is etiologically associated with multiple lymphoma subtypes. Herein, we evaluated the clinical utility of EBV real-time quantitative PCR in comparison with the widely used Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH) method in 912 patients with four lymphoma subtypes: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), and Hodgkin lymphoma. We also assessed the impact of EBV positivity determined from each method or a combination of both methods on mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression. EBV real-time quantitative PCR identified more positive cases than EBER-ISH for all subtypes, except ENKTCL. EBV DNA-positive patients with ENKTCL and PTCL displayed poorer overall survival (OS) than EBV DNA-negative patients (P = 0.0016 and P = 0.0013, respectively). In addition, among those with EBER-positive DLBCL and ENKTL and those with EBER-negative PTCL, OS was significantly worse for EBV DNA-positive patients (P = 0.027, P = 0.0016, and P = 0.0018, respectively). EBER positivity was associated with worse OS for DLBCL (P = 0.037), in reanalyses including only the 862 patients with unambiguous EBER-ISH results. Overall, EBV DNA positivity is a more effective prognostic marker than EBER-ISH status for patients with certain lymphoma subtypes.

New insights into Epstein‑Barr virus‑associated tumors: Exosomes (Review)

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is endemic worldwide and is associated with a number of human tumors. EBV-associated tumors have unique mechanisms of tumorigenesis. EBV encodes multiple oncogenic molecules that can be loaded into exosomes released by EBV⁺ tumor cells to mediate intercellular communication. Moreover, different EBV⁺ tumor cells secrete exosomes that act on various target cells with various biological functions. In addition to oncogenicity, EBV⁺ exosomes have potential immunosuppressive effects. Investigating EBV⁺ exosomes could identify the role of EBV in tumorigenesis and progression. The present review summarized advances in studies focusing on exosomes and the functions of EBV⁺ exosomes derived from different EBV-associated tumors. EBV⁺ exosomes are expected to become a new biomarker for disease diagnosis and prognosis. Therefore, exosome-targeted therapy displays potential.