Comparison of opioid receptor distributions in the rat ileum

Novel insights into mechanisms of inhibition of colonic motility by loperamide

Background

It is well known that opiates slow gastrointestinal (GI) transit, via suppression of enteric cholinergic neurotransmission throughout the GI tract, particularly the large intestine where constipation is commonly induced. It is not clear whether there is uniform suppression of enteric neurotransmission and colonic motility across the full length of the colon. Here, we investigated whether regional changes in colonic motility occur using the peripherally-restricted mu opioid agonist, loperamide to inhibit colonic motor complexes (CMCs) in isolated mouse colon.

Methods

High-resolution video imaging was performed to monitor colonic wall diameter on isolated whole mouse colon. Regional changes in the effects of loperamide on the pattern generator underlying cyclical CMCs and their propagation across the full length of large intestine were determined.

Results

The sensitivity of CMCs to loperamide across the length of colon varied significantly. Although there was a dose-dependent inhibition of CMCs with increasing concentrations of loperamide (10 nM - 1 μM), a major observation was that in the mid and distal colon, CMCs were abolished at low doses of loperamide (100 nM), while in the proximal colon, CMCs persisted at the same low concentration, albeit at a significantly slower frequency. Propagation velocity of CMCs was significantly reduced by 46%. The inhibitory effects of loperamide on CMCs were reversed by naloxone (1 μM). Naloxone alone did not change ongoing CMC characteristics.

Discussion

The results show pronounced differences in the inhibitory action of loperamide across the length of large intestine. The most potent effect of loperamide to retard colonic transit occurred between the proximal colon and mid/distal regions of colon. One of the possibilities as to why this occurs is because the greatest density of mu opioid receptors are located on interneurons responsible for neuro-neuronal transmission underlying CMCs propagation between the proximal and mid/distal colon. The absence of effect of naloxone alone on CMC characteristics suggest that the mu opioid receptor has little ongoing constitutive activity under our recording conditions.

The role of kappa opioid receptors in immune system - An overview

Opioids are one of the most effective anti-nociceptive agents used in patients with cancer pain or after serious surgery in most countries. The endogenous opioid system participates in pain perception, but recently its role in inflammation was determined. κ-opioid receptors (KOP receptors), a member of the opioid receptor family, are expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system as well as on the surface of different types of immune cells, e.g. T cells, B cells and monocytes. In this review, we focused on the involvement of KOP receptors in the inflammatory process and described their function in a number of conditions in which the immune system plays a key role (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, vascular dysfunction) and inflammatory pain. We summed up the application of known KOP ligands in pathophysiology and we aimed to shed new light on KOP receptors as important elements during inflammation.

Crosstalk between Opioid and Anti-Opioid Systems: An Overview and Its Possible Therapeutic Significance

Opioid peptides and receptors are broadly expressed throughout peripheral and central nervous systems and have been the subject of intense long-term investigations. Such studies indicate that some endogenous neuropeptides, called anti-opioids, participate in a homeostatic system that tends to reduce the effects of endogenous and exogenous opioids. Anti-opioid properties have been attributed to various peptides, including melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF)-related peptides, cholecystokinin (CCK), nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), and neuropeptide FF (NPFF). These peptides counteract some of the acute effects of opioids, and therefore, they are involved in the development of opioid tolerance and addiction. In this work, the anti-opioid profile of endogenous peptides was described, mainly taking into account their inhibitory influence on opioid-induced effects. However, the anti-opioid peptides demonstrated complex properties and could show opioid-like as well as anti-opioid effects. The aim of this review is to detail the phenomenon of crosstalk taking place between opioid and anti-opioid systems at the in vivo pharmacological level and to propose a cellular and molecular basis for these interactions. A better knowledge of these mechanisms has potential therapeutic interest for the control of opioid functions, notably for alleviating pain and/or for the treatment of opioid abuse.

Pharmacological and molecular docking assessment of cryptotanshinone as natural-derived analgesic compound

Medicinal plants from traditional chinese medicine are used increasingly worldwide for their benefits to health and quality of life for the relevant clinical symptoms related to pain. Among them, Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge is traditionally used in asian countries as antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory and analgesic agent. In this context, several evidences support the hypothesis that some tanshinones, in particular cryptotanshinone (CRY), extracted from the roots (Danshen) of this plant exhibit analgesic actions. However, it is surprisingly noted that no pharmacological studies have been carried out to explore the possible analgesic action of this compound in terms of modulation of peripheral and/or central pain. Therefore, in the present study, by using peripheral and central pain models of nociception, such as tail flick and hot plate test, the analgesic effect of CRY in mice was evaluated. Successively, by the aim of a computational approach, we have evaluated the interaction mode of this diterpenoid on opioid and cannabinoid system. Finally, CRY was dosed in mice serum by an HPLC method validated according to European Medicines Agency guidelines validation rules. Here, we report that CRY displayed anti-nociceptive activity on both hot plate and tail flick test, with a prominent long-lasting peripheral analgesic effect. These evidences were indirectly confirmed after the daily administration of the tanshinone for 7 and 14 days. In addition, the analgesic effect of CRY was reverted by naloxone and cannabinoid antagonists and amplified by arginine administration. These findings were finally supported by HPLC and docking studies, that revealed a noteworthy presence of CRY on mice serum 1 h after its intraperitoneal administration and a possible interaction of tested compound on μ and k receptors. Taken together, these results provide a new line of evidences showing that CRY can produce analgesia against various phenotypes of nociception with a mechanism that seems to be related to an agonistic activity on opioid system.

The Mechanisms Involved in Morphine Addiction: An Overview

Opioid use disorder is classified as a chronic recurrent disease of the central nervous system (CNS) which leads to personality disorders, co-morbidities and premature death. It develops as a result of long-term administration of various abused substances, along with morphine. The pharmacological action of morphine is associated with its stimulation of opioid receptors. Opioid receptors are a group of G protein-coupled receptors and activation of these receptors by ligands induces significant molecular changes inside the cell, such as an inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity, activation of potassium channels and reductions of calcium conductance. Recent data indicate that other signalling pathways also may be involved in morphine activity. Among these are phospholipase C, mitogen-activated kinases (MAP kinases) or β-arrestin. The present review focuses on major mechanisms which currently are considered as essential in morphine activity and dependence and may be important for further studies.

Enkephalins and ACTH in the mammalian nervous system

The pentapeptides methionine-enkephalin and leucine-enkephalin belong to the opioid family of peptides, and the non-opiate peptide adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) to the melanocortin peptide family. Enkephalins/ACTH are derived from pro-enkephalin, pro-dynorphin or pro-opiomelanocortin precursors and, via opioid and melanocortin receptors, are responsible for many biological activities. Enkephalins exhibit the highest affinity for the δ receptor, followed by the μ and κ receptors, whereas ACTH binds to the five subtypes of melanocortin receptor, and is the only member of the melanocortin family of peptides that binds to the melanocortin-receptor 2 (ACTH receptor). Enkephalins/ACTH and their receptors exhibit a widespread anatomical distribution. Enkephalins are involved in analgesia, angiogenesis, blood pressure, embryonic development, emotional behavior, feeding, hypoxia, limbic system modulation, neuroprotection, peristalsis, and wound repair; as well as in hepatoprotective, motor, neuroendocrine and respiratory mechanisms. ACTH plays a role in acetylcholine release, aggressive behavior, blood pressure, bone maintenance, hyperalgesia, feeding, fever, grooming, learning, lipolysis, memory, nerve injury repair, neuroprotection, sexual behavior, sleep, social behavior, tissue growth and stimulates the synthesis and secretion of glucocorticoids. Enkephalins/ACTH are also involved in many pathologies. Enkephalins are implicated in alcoholism, cancer, colitis, depression, heart failure, Huntington's disease, influenza A virus infection, ischemia, multiple sclerosis, and stress. ACTH plays a role in Addison's disease, alcoholism, cancer, Cushing's disease, dermatitis, encephalitis, epilepsy, Graves' disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, multiple sclerosis, podocytopathies, and stress. In this review, we provide an updated description of the enkephalinergic and ACTH systems.

Pharmacologic effects of naldemedine, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, in in vitro and in vivo models of opioid-induced constipation

BACKGROUND

Naldemedine (S-297995) is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist developed as a once-daily oral drug for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults with chronic noncancer or cancer pain. This study characterized the pharmacological effects of naldemedine in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The binding affinity and antagonist activity of naldemedine against recombinant human μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors were assayed in vitro. Pharmacologic effects of naldemedine were investigated using animal models of morphine-induced inhibition of small and large intestinal transit, castor oil-induced diarrhea, antinociception, and morphine withdrawal.

KEY RESULTS

Naldemedine showed potent binding affinity and antagonist activities for recombinant human μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors. Naldemedine significantly reduced opioid-induced inhibition of small intestinal transit (0.03-10 mg kg^-1 ; P < 0.05) and large intestinal transit (0.3-1 μmol L^-1 ; P < 0.05). Naldemedine (0.03-1 mg kg^-1 ) pretreatment significantly reversed the inhibition of castor oil-induced diarrhea by subcutaneous morphine (P < 0.01). Naldemedine (1-30 mg kg^-1 ) pretreatment (1 or 2 hours) did not alter the analgesic effects of morphine in a model measuring the latency of a rat to flick its tail following thermal stimulation. However, a significant delayed reduction of the analgesic effect of morphine was seen with higher doses of naldemedine (10-30 mg kg^-1 ). Some centrally mediated and peripherally mediated withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent rats were seen with naldemedine doses ≥3 and ≥0.3 mg kg^-1 , respectively.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Naldemedine displayed potent binding affinity to, and antagonistic activity against, μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors. Naldemedine tempered OIC in vivo without compromising opioid analgesia.

Delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole reduces oxycodone addiction and constipation in mice

Oxycodone, a widely prescribed and very potent oral opioid analgesic agent, is highly addictive and has many side effects, including troublesome constipation. Our studies in mice indicated that pretreatment of naltrindole did not significantly affect the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone but attenuated the tolerance and withdrawal induced by chronic oxycodone administration. Naltrindole also attenuated the oxycodone-induced rewarding and re-instatement behaviors, as shown by the conditioned place preference test. Further, oxycodone-induced decrease in intestinal transit (i.e., constipation) was reduced by naltrindole. However, naltrindole did not block the respiratory depression produced by oxycodone. Taken together, these data suggest that naltrindole can attenuate some major side effects while retaining the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone in mice. Naltrindole and oxycodone may have the potential to be a potent analgesic combination with much lower levels of oxycodone's side effects of addictive liability and constipation.

Insights into the Role of Opioid Receptors in the GI Tract: Experimental Evidence and Therapeutic Relevance

Opioid drugs are prescribed extensively for pain treatment but when used chronically they induce constipation that can progress to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Opioid drugs interact with three classes of opioid receptors: mu opioid receptors (MORs), delta opioid receptors (DOR), and kappa opioid receptors (KORs), but opioid drugs mostly target the MORs. Upon stimulation, opioid receptors couple to inhibitory Gi/Go proteins that activate or inhibit downstream effector proteins. MOR and DOR couple to inhibition of adenylate cyclase and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and to activation of K+ channels resulting in reduced neuronal activity and neurotransmitter release. KORs couple to inhibition of Ca2+ channels and neurotransmitter release. In the gastrointestinal tract, opioid receptors are localized to enteric neurons, interstitial cells of Cajal, and immune cells. In humans, MOR, DOR, and KOR link to inhibition of acetylcholine release from enteric interneurons and motor neurons and purine/nitric oxide release from inhibitory motor neurons causing inhibition of propulsive motility patterns. MOR and DOR activation also results in inhibition of submucosal secretomotor neurons reducing active Cl- secretion and passive water movement into the colonic lumen. Together, these effects on motility and secretion account for the constipation caused by opioid receptor agonists. Tolerance develops to the analgesic effects of opioid receptor agonists but not to the constipating actions. This may be due to differences in trafficking and downstream signaling in enteric nerves in the colon compared to the small intestine and in neuronal pain pathways. Further studies of differential opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance in subsets of enteric neurons may identify new drug or other treatment strategies of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

Opioidergic effects on enteric and sensory nerves in the lower GI tract: basic mechanisms and clinical implications

Opioids are one of the most prescribed drug classes for treating acute pain. However, chronic use is often associated with tolerance as well as debilitating side effects, including nausea and dependence, which are mediated by the central nervous system, as well as constipation emerging from effects on the enteric nervous system. These gastrointestinal (GI) side effects limit the usefulness of opioids in treating pain in many patients. Understanding the mechanism(s) of action of opioids on the nervous system that shows clinical benefit as well as those that have unwanted effects is critical for the improvement of opioid drugs. The opioidergic system comprises three classical receptors (μ, δ, κ) and a nonclassical receptor (nociceptin), and each of these receptors is expressed to varying extents by the enteric and intestinal extrinsic sensory afferent nerves. The purpose of this review is to discuss the role that the opioidergic system has on enteric and extrinsic afferent nerves in the lower GI tract in health and diseases of the lower GI tract, particularly inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, and the implications of opioid treatment on clinical outcomes. Consideration is also given to emerging developments in our understanding of the immune system as a novel source of endogenous opioids and the mechanisms underlying opioid tolerance, including the potential influence of opioid receptor splice variants and heteromeric complexes.

Molecular characterization of eluxadoline as a potential ligand targeting mu-delta opioid receptor heteromers

Eluxadoline, an orally active mixed μ opioid receptor (μOR) agonist δ opioid receptor (δOR) antagonist developed for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, normalizes gastrointestinal (GI) transit and defecation under conditions of novel environment stress or post-inflammatory altered GI function. Furthermore, compared to loperamide, which is used to treat non-specific diarrhea, the effects of eluxadoline on GI transit occur over a wider dosage range. However, the mechanisms of action of eluxadoline are unclear. In this study, we compared the ability of eluxadoline and loperamide to activate G-protein- and β-arrestin-mediated signaling at μOR homomers or μOR-δOR heteromers in heterologous cells. We also examined the ability of both compounds to reduce castor oil induced diarrhea in wild type (WT) and mice lacking δOR. We find that eluxadoline is more potent than loperamide in eliciting G-protein activity and β-arrestin recruitment in μOR expressing cells. However, in cells expressing μOR-δOR heteromers, the potency of eluxadoline is higher, but its maximal effect is lower than that of loperamide. Moreover, in these cells the signaling mediated by eluxadoline but not loperamide is reduced by μOR-δOR heteromer-selective antibodies. We find that in castor oil-induced diarrhea eluxadoline is more efficacious compared to loperamide in WT mice, and δOR appears to play a role in this process. Taken together these results indicate that eluxadoline behaves as a potent μOR agonist in the absence of δOR, while in the presence of δOR eluxadoline's effects are mediated through the μOR-δOR heteromer.

Modulation of gastrointestinal function by MuDelta, a mixed µ opioid receptor agonist/ µ opioid receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Loperamide is a selective µ opioid receptor agonist acting locally in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as an effective anti-diarrhoeal but can cause constipation. We tested whether modulating µ opioid receptor agonism with δ opioid receptor antagonism, by combining reference compounds or using a novel compound ('MuDelta'), could normalize GI motility without constipation.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

MuDelta was characterized in vitro as a potent µ opioid receptor agonist and high-affinity δ opioid receptor antagonist. Reference compounds, MuDelta and loperamide were assessed in the following ex vivo and in vivo experiments: guinea pig intestinal smooth muscle contractility, mouse intestinal epithelial ion transport and upper GI tract transit, entire GI transit or faecal output in novel environment stressed mice, or four weeks after intracolonic mustard oil (post-inflammatory). Colonic δ opioid receptor immunoreactivity was quantified.

KEY RESULTS

δ Opioid receptor antagonism opposed µ opioid receptor agonist inhibition of intestinal contractility and motility. MuDelta reduced intestinal contractility and inhibited neurogenically-mediated secretion. Very low plasma levels of MuDelta were detected after oral administration. Stress up-regulated δ opioid receptor expression in colonic epithelial cells. In stressed mice, MuDelta normalized GI transit and faecal output to control levels over a wide dose range, whereas loperamide had a narrow dose range. MuDelta and loperamide reduced upper GI transit in the post-inflammatory model.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

MuDelta normalizes, but does not prevent, perturbed GI transit over a wide dose-range in mice. These data support the subsequent assessment of MuDelta in a clinical phase II trial in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Localization and regulation of fluorescently labeled delta opioid receptor, expressed in enteric neurons of mice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Opioids and opiates inhibit gastrointestinal functions via μ, δ, and κ receptors. Although agonists of the δ opioid receptor (DOR) suppress motility and secretion, little is known about the localization and regulation of DOR in the gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

We studied mice in which the gene that encodes the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) was inserted into Oprd1, which encodes DOR, to express an approximately 80-kilodalton product (DOReGFP). We used these mice to localize DOR and to determine how agonists regulate the subcellular distribution of DOR.

RESULTS

DOReGFP was expressed in all regions but was confined to enteric neurons and fibers within the muscularis externa. In the submucosal plexus, DOReGFP was detected in neuropeptide Y-positive secretomotor and vasodilator neurons of the small intestine, but rarely was observed in the large bowel. In the myenteric plexus of the small intestine, DOReGFP was present in similar proportions of excitatory motoneurons and interneurons that expressed choline acetyltransferase and substance P, and in inhibitory motoneurons and interneurons that contained nitric oxide synthase. DOReGFP was present mostly in nitrergic myenteric neurons of colon. DOReGFP and μ opioid receptors often were co-expressed. DOReGFP-expressing neurons were associated with enkephalin-containing varicosities, and enkephalin-induced clathrin- and dynamin-mediated endocytosis and lysosomal trafficking of DOReGFP. DOReGFP replenishment at the plasma membrane was slow, requiring de novo synthesis, rather than recycling.

CONCLUSIONS

DOR localizes specifically to submucosal and myenteric neurons, which might account for the ability of DOR agonists to inhibit gastrointestinal secretion and motility. Sustained down-regulation of DOReGFP at the plasma membrane of activated neurons could induce long-lasting tolerance to DOR agonists.

UMB-3, a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody, for assessing μ-opioid receptor expression in mouse, rat and human formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues

BACKGROUND

The immunohistochemical localization of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR, MOP) has been studied in detail in mouse and rat brain using a variety of polyclonal antibodies. However, biochemical analysis of the MOR signaling complex in vivo has been hampered by the lack of suitable monoclonal antibodies for efficient immunoprecipitation of the receptor protein from native sources. Moreover, previous immunohistochemical investigations were restricted to frozen sections from perfusion-fixed rodent brain, largely due to the limited availability of MOR antibodies that effectively stain paraffin-embedded tissues.

METHODS

Here, we extensively characterized the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-MOR antibody UMB-3 using transfected cells and MOR-deficient mice. UMB-3 was also subjected to a comparative immunohistochemical study of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse and rat organ samples as well as human normal and neoplastic tissues.

RESULTS

Specificity of UMB-3 was demonstrated by detection of a broad band migrating at M(r) 70,000-80,000 in immunoprecipitates from crude brain homogenates of MOR+/+ mice but not of MOR⁻/⁻ mice; cell surface staining of MOR-transfected cells; translocation of MOR receptor immunostaining after agonist exposure; distinct immunostaining of neuronal cell bodies and fibers in MOR-expressing brain regions; absence of staining in MOR-deficient mice; and abolition of tissue immunostaining by preadsorption of UMB-3 with its immunizing peptide.

CONCLUSIONS

The rabbit monoclonal antibody UMB-3 is an excellent tool for immunoprecipitation of MOR from native sources as well as for immunohistochemical staining of MOR in paraffin-embedded tissue samples of rodent and human origin.

Distribution of kappa-opioid receptor in the pulmonary artery and its changes during hypoxia

The present study evaluated the distribution of kappa-opioid receptors (kappa-ORs) in pulmonary arteries (PAs) in rats and investigated whether kappa-ORs are altered in PAs during hypoxia. An animal model of hypobaric/hypoxic pulmonary hypertension and a pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell (PASMC) model of hypoxia were utilized. Distribution of kappa-ORs was determined by fluorescence immunohistochemistry and changes in kappa-ORs expression in PAs and PASMCs were determined by fluorescence immunohistochemistry or Western blot techniques. The kappa-ORs were primarily distributed in the smooth muscle layer of the PAs and in the nucleus of PASMCs. The expression of the kappa-ORs were increased in PAs of rats subjected to hypoxia for 1-4 week (P < 0.01). Accordingly, the expression of kappa-ORs in PASMCs were also increased when subjected to hypoxia for 12-36 hr (P < 0.05). The present study has provided evidence for the first time of the precise location of kappa-ORs in PAs and PASMCs of rats and that hypoxia upregulates expression of kappa-ORs.

Morphine leads to contraction of the ileal circular muscle via inhibition of the nitrergic pathway in mice

Morphine inhibits small intestinal transit in mice, although few mu-opioid receptors are present in the ileum. The present study focused on the action of morphine in the isolated mouse ileum to reveal the mechanism by which morphine inhibits mouse small intestinal transit. In the isolated circular muscle, morphine caused tonic contraction. This contraction was potently inhibited by naloxone and the mu-opioid receptor antagonist cyprodime. Moreover, the response was almost completely inhibited by tetrodotoxin and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine, but only moderately inhibited by atropine and indomethacin. In the isolated longitudinal muscle, morphine caused no or only slight contractions. Furthermore, electrically induced contraction was dose-dependently depressed by morphine, an effect that was not reversed by naloxone. These findings indicate that 1) morphine-induced circular muscle contraction occurs in the mouse ileum, 2) the contraction occurs through mu-opioid receptors mainly by inhibiting the release of nitric oxide from nitrergic nerves, although cholinergic nerves are at least partly involved in this contractile mechanism, and 3) inhibition of descending relaxation of peristalsis by morphine may slow small intestinal transit.