Effect of repeated allogeneic bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation on brain injury following transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats

Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells to treat severe traumatic brain injury in children

Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) infused after severe traumatic brain injury have shown promise for treating the injury. We evaluated their impact in children, particularly their hypothesized ability to preserve the blood-brain barrier and diminish neuroinflammation, leading to structural CNS preservation with improved outcomes. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-sham-controlled Bayesian dose-escalation clinical trial at two children's hospitals in Houston, TX and Phoenix, AZ, USA (NCT01851083). Patients 5-17 years of age with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8) were randomized to BMMNC or placebo (3:2). Bone marrow harvest, cell isolation and infusion were completed by 48 h post-injury. A Bayesian continuous reassessment method was used with cohorts of size 3 in the BMMNC group to choose the safest between two doses. Primary end points were quantitative brain volumes using MRI and microstructural integrity of the corpus callosum (diffusivity and oedema measurements) at 6 months and 12 months. Long-term functional outcomes and ventilator days, intracranial pressure monitoring days, intensive care unit days and therapeutic intensity measures were compared between groups. Forty-seven patients were randomized, with 37 completing 1-year follow-up (23 BMMNC, 14 placebo). BMMNC treatment was associated with an almost 3-day (23%) reduction in ventilator days, 1-day (16%) reduction in intracranial pressure monitoring days and 3-day (14%) reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) days. White matter volume at 1 year in the BMMNC group was significantly preserved compared to placebo [decrease of 19 891 versus 40 491, respectively; mean difference of -20 600, 95% confidence interval (CI): -35 868 to -5332; P = 0.01], and the number of corpus callosum streamlines was reduced more in placebo than BMMNC, supporting evidence of preserved corpus callosum connectivity in the treated groups (-431 streamlines placebo versus -37 streamlines BMMNC; mean difference of -394, 95% CI: -803 to 15; P = 0.055), but this did not reach statistical significance due to high variability. We conclude that autologous BMMNC infusion in children within 48 h after severe traumatic brain injury is safe and feasible. Our data show that BMMNC infusion led to: (i) shorter intensive care duration and decreased ICU intensity; (ii) white matter structural preservation; and (iii) enhanced corpus callosum connectivity and improved microstructural metrics.

Opportunities for developing neural stem cell treatments for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and gap analysis

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of disability and death. Current treatments are limited. Stem cell therapy has been highlighted as a potentially effective treatment to mitigate damage and restore function, but efficacy results are mixed. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on stem cell therapies for early acute ischemic stroke; and identify opportunities for future research to facilitate the development of an effective stem cell-based treatment. Original research published within the last 10 years that focused on the evaluation of a stem cell-based treatment for acute ischemic stroke in adult patients or subjects was included. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE and Cochrane risk of bias tools for animal and human studies, respectively. 3,396 articles were screened, 58 full-text articles were reviewed and 33 met inclusion criteria. Many studies appeared to be at risk of bias. Study designs and results were heterogeneous. Most studies were preclinical and involved stem cell administration within 24 hours. Seven studies tested the effects of multiple administration timepoints and one investigated repeat dosing. Six studies were conducted in humans and stem cell administration ranged from 24 hours to 90 days post stroke. Most studies employed the use of mesenchymal stem cells. The most appropriate cell delivery method appeared to be intra-arterial. Evidence suggests that stem cell therapy may be associated with beneficial effects. A literature gap analysis identified numerous opportunities for treatment development.

Comparative evaluation of rhFGF18 and rhGDF11 treatment in a transient ischemia stroke model

Background

Pharmacological treatments for ischemic stroke remain limited to thrombolysis, which is associated with increased risk of potentially fatal hemorrhage. Treatments with Recombinant Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 18 (rhFGF18) and Growth and Differentiation Factor 11 (rhGDF11) appear promising based on different preclinical models. The goal of this study was to compare the effects of rhFGF18 and rhGDF11 directly on survival, behavioral deficits, and histological fingerprint of cerebral ischemia in the Wistar rat middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model of stroke.

Methods

Ischemia-reperfusion injury was induced using a 2-hour transient MCAO. Animals were administered rhFGF18 (infusion), rhGDF11 (multi-injection), or Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) vehicle control and followed for 42 days. Motor-Cognitive deficits were evaluated using the Morris Water Maze at Days 0 (pre-MCAO), 7, 21, and 42. Histopathological assessments were performed on Days 21 and 42.

Results

Day 7 post-ischemia water maze performance times increased 38.3%, 2.1%, and 23.1% for PBS, rhFGF18, and rhGDF11-treated groups, respectively. Fraction of neurons with abnormal morphology (chromatolysis, pyknotic nuclei, somal degeneration) decreased in all groups toward Day 42 and was lowest for rhFGF18. AChE-positive fiber density and activity increased over time in the rhFGF18 group, remained unchanged in the rhGDF11 treatment arm, and declined in the PBS control. Metabolic increases were greatest in rhGDF11 treated animals, with both rhFGF18 and rhGDF11 achieving improvements over PBS, as evidenced by increased succinate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase activity. Finally, rhFGF18 treatment exhibited a trend for reduced mortality relative to PBS (5.6%, 95% CI [27.3%, 0.1% ] vs. 22.2%, 95% CI [47.6%, 6.4% ]).

Conclusions

rhFGF18 treatment appears promising in improving survival and promoting motor-cognitive recovery following cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: An overview of experimental models and reality

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder. The pathology of AD is characterized by extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau, neuronal death, synapse loss, and brain atrophy. Many therapies have been tested to improve or at least effectively modify the course of AD. Meaningful data indicate that the transplantation of stem cells can alleviate neuropathology and significantly ameliorate cognitive deficits in animal models with Alzheimer's disease. Transplanted stem cells have shown their inherent advantages in improving cognitive impairment and memory dysfunction, although certain weaknesses or limitations need to be overcome. This review recapitulates rodent models for AD, the therapeutic efficacy of stem cells, influencing factors, and the underlying mechanisms behind these changes. Stem cell therapy provides perspective and challenges for its clinical application in the future.

Recent Advances in Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke

Stroke is the most prevalent cardiovascular disease worldwide, and is still one of the leading causes of death and disability. Stem cell-based therapy is actively being investigated as a new potential treatment for certain neurological disorders, including stroke. Various types of cells, including bone marrow mononuclear cells, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, dental pulp stem cells, neural stem cells, inducible pluripotent stem cells, and genetically modified stem cells have been found to improve neurological outcomes in animal models of stroke, and there are some ongoing clinical trials assessing their efficacy in humans. In this review, we aim to summarize the recent advances in cell-based therapies to treat stroke.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells in Animal Models of Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) offer the promise of augmenting poststroke recovery. There is mounting evidence of safety and efficacy of BMMNCs from preclinical studies of ischemic stroke; however, their pooled effects have not been described.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of preclinical literature for intravenous use of BMMNCs followed by meta-analyses of histological and behavioral outcomes. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria. Data were abstracted by 2 independent investigators. After quality assessment, the pooled effects were generated using mixed-effect models. Impact of possible biases on estimated effect size was evaluated.

RESULTS

Standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval for reduction in lesion volume was significantly beneficial for BMMNC treatment (standardized mean difference: -3.3; 95% confidence interval, -4.3 to -2.3). n=113 each for BMMNC and controls. BMMNC-treated animals (n=161) also had improved function measured by cylinder test (standardized mean difference: -2.4; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to -1.6), as compared with controls (n=205). A trend for benefit was observed for adhesive removal test and neurological deficit score. Study quality score (median: 6; Q1-Q3: 5-7) was correlated with year of publication. There was funnel plot asymmetry; however, the pooled effects were robust to the correction of this bias and remained significant in favor of BMMNC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

BMMNCs demonstrate beneficial effects across histological and behavioral outcomes in animal ischemic stroke models. Although study quality has improved over time, considerable degree of heterogeneity calls for standardization in the conduct and reporting of experimentation.

Intravenous transplantation of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells prevents memory impairment in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease

Stem cell transplantation therapy is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of ischemic stroke, and several beneficial aspects have been reported. Similarly, in Alzheimer's disease (AD), stem cell therapy is expected to provide an efficient therapeutic approach. Indeed, the intracerebral transplantation of stem cells reduced amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition and rescued memory deficits in AD model mice. Here, we show that intravenous transplantation of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMMCs) improves cognitive function in two different AD mouse models, DAL and APP mice, and prevents neurodegeneration. GFP-positive BMMCs were isolated from tibiae and femurs of 4-week-old mice and then transplanted intravenously into DAL and APP mice. Transplantation of BMMCs suppressed neuronal loss and restored memory impairment of DAL mice to almost the same level as in wild-type mice. Transplantation of BMMCs to APP mice reduced Aβ deposition in the brain. APP mice treated with BMMCs performed significantly better on behavioral tests than vehicle-injected mice. Moreover, the effects were observed even with transplantation after the onset of cognitive impairment in DAL mice. Together, our results indicate that intravenous transplantation of BMMCs has preventive effects against the cognitive decline in AD model mice and suggest a potential therapeutic effect of BMMC transplantation therapy.