Comparative effects of the anti-platelet drugs, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and cilostazol on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and damage in rats

Review on recent advancements in understanding acetylsalicylic acid-induced gastrointestinal injury: mechanisms, medication, and dosage refinement

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is a clinical drug with multiple effects, including prevention of cardiovascular adverse events and anti-cancer effects. However, gastrointestinal side effects, such as gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding, limit the use of ASA and reduce patient compliance. Various studies have investigated the mechanisms of ASA-induced gastrointestinal injury, and many medicines have been reported to be effective in preventing and treating the adverse gastrointestinal effects of ASA. New formulations of ASA have demonstrated milder gastrointestinal injury than ASA alone. In this article, we summarized the mechanisms of ASA-induced gastrointestinal injury, drugs that resist gastrointestinal side effects of ASA, and progress in research on formulation improvement of ASA to help resolve the clinical dilemma of ASA usage.

The drug risks of cilostazol: A pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

OBJECTIVE

Cilostazol is indicated for alleviating intermittent claudication (IC) in stable-phase peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. Conducting data mining on adverse events (AEs) of cilostazol in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to explore its potential medication risks and advance more rational and secure clinical medication practices.

METHODS

This study utilized the Open Vigil 2.1-MedDRA tool to retrieve and extract AE reporting data related to cilostazol from the FAERS database spanning the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. The primary methodology employed was the application of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method to detect risk signals associated with AEs of cilostazol.

RESULTS

A total of 2,130 AE reports involving cilostazol were identified as the primary suspect drug, with a total of 7,134 AEs reported. These reports were predominantly concentrated among patients aged 60 and above, with a higher occurrence in males compared to females. Japan ranked first among the reporting countries, and the majority of reports were submitted by healthcare professionals. Through the screening of cilostazol, a total of 323 positive risk signals for AEs were identified, encompassing 23 system organ classes (SOCs). A comparison with the existing cilostazol product label revealed 8 AEs that were not included based on the number of AE reports, and 19 AEs that were not included based on the strength of the risk signals. Cilostazol exhibited positive risk signals for AEs primarily affecting 8 organ systems based on the SOC classification. Among these, cardiac disorders ranked highest, with a total of 53 positive risk signals for cardiovascular-related AEs identified. In terms of the number of reports, cardiac failure ranked first, aligning with the black box warning issued by the FDA regarding cilostazol. The occurrence of adverse reactions related to cilostazol is primarily concentrated within the first month of treatment. However, a certain proportion of adverse reactions have been reported to occur after long-term use (exceeding 360 days) of cilostazol therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results have further enriched the observations from existing clinical and real-world studies, uncovering new AE signals for cilostazol, including fall, cerebral infarction, pneumonia, loss of consciousness, acute kidney injury, renal impairment, renal failure, cardiac vein perforation, basal ganglia haematoma, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, et al. This study also highlights the significant impact of cilostazol on the cardiovascular system, necessitating close attention to potential cardiovascular toxicities. In addition to focusing on the short-term adverse reactions following cilostazol administration, thorough research into its long-term safety profile is also imperative. This study provides recommendations and guidance for the rational and safe clinical use of cilostazol. In the future, prospective studies are needed to explore the occurrence of related AEs further.

Discovery and Development of First-in-Class ACKR3/CXCR7 Superagonists for Platelet Degranulation Modulation

The atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), formerly known as CXC-chemokine receptor 7 (CXCR7), has been postulated to regulate platelet function and thrombus formation. Herein, we report the discovery and development of first-in-class ACKR3 agonists, which demonstrated superagonistic properties with E_max values of up to 160% compared to the endogenous reference ligand CXCL12 in a β-arrestin recruitment assay. Initial in silico screening using an ACKR3 homology model identified two hits, C10 (EC₅₀ 19.1 μM) and C11 (EC₅₀ = 11.4 μM). Based on these hits, extensive structure-activity relationship studies were conducted by synthesis and testing of derivatives. It resulted in the identification of the novel thiadiazolopyrimidinone-based compounds 26 (LN5972, EC₅₀ = 3.4 μM) and 27 (LN6023, EC₅₀ = 3.5 μM). These compounds are selective for ACKR3 versus CXCR4 and show metabolic stability. In a platelet degranulation assay, these agonists effectively reduced P-selectin expression by up to 97%, suggesting potential candidates for the treatment of platelet-mediated thrombosis.

Use of Antiplatelet Agents Decreases the Positive Predictive Value of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer but Does Not Affect Their Sensitivity

Previous studies have evaluated the effects of antithrombotic agents on the performance of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but the results were inconsistent and based on small sample sizes. We studied this topic using a large-scale population-based database. Using the Korean National Cancer Screening Program Database, we compared the performance of FITs for CRC detection between users and non-users of antiplatelet agents and warfarin. Non-users were matched according to age and sex. Among 5,426,469 eligible participants, 768,733 used antiplatelet agents (mono/dual/triple therapy, n = 701,683/63,211/3839), and 19,569 used warfarin, while 4,638,167 were non-users. Among antiplatelet agents, aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol ranked first, second, and third, respectively, in terms of prescription rates. Users of antiplatelet agents (3.62% vs. 4.45%; relative risk (RR): 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.88), aspirin (3.66% vs. 4.13%; RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83–0.97), and clopidogrel (3.48% vs. 4.88%; RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61–0.86) had lower positive predictive values (PPVs) for CRC detection than non-users. However, there were no significant differences in PPV between cilostazol vs. non-users and warfarin users vs. non-users. For PPV, the RR (users vs. non-users) for antiplatelet monotherapy was 0.86, while the RRs for dual and triple antiplatelet therapies (excluding cilostazol) were 0.67 and 0.22, respectively. For all antithrombotic agents, the sensitivity for CRC detection was not different between users and non-users. Use of antiplatelet agents, except cilostazol, may increase the false positives without improving the sensitivity of FITs for CRC detection.

Comparison of long-term efficacy and safety between cilostazol and clopidogrel in chronic ischemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study

Background:

Previous clinical trials showed a significant difference in efficacy and safety among antiplatelets in acute ischemic stroke (IS). The present study wished to compare the efficacy and safety head-to-head between cilostazol and clopidogrel in chronic IS.

Methods:

This open prospective cohort study recruited chronic IS patients with an index hospitalization between 2001 and 2013 from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. In the 504,191 hospitalized patients, patients who had missing information and history of atrial fibrillation or rheumatic heart disease, received mechanical valve replacement or anticoagulants, expired during the index hospitalization, received follow-up ⩽6 months, or had recurrent stroke within 6 months after index stroke were excluded.

Results:

Among the 15,968 eligible patients, 502 patients who consistently received either cilostazol or clopidogrel from the 7th month after the index stroke were included for analysis after propensity score matching. The 3-year primary outcomes showed similar frequency of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and similar frequency of intracerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and major bleeding between the cilostazol and clopidogrel groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a history of hypertension or gastrointestinal bleeding had a trend of having lower frequency of recurrent IS or major bleeding, respectively, in the cilostazol group.

Conclusion:

The present real-world study demonstrated no significant difference in efficacy and safety between cilostazol and clopidogrel in chronic IS. However, cilostazol might be better than clopidogrel in patients with a history of hypertension or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Effects of melatonin on acetylsalicylic acid induced gastroduodenal and jejunal mucosal injury

We evaluated the effects of melatonin on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) induced gastroduodenal and jejunal mucosal injury. We used 40 postpubertal rats divided randomly into five groups of eight animals. The control group consisted of untreated animals. The Mel group was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 5 mg/kg melatonin. The ASA group was injected i.p. with 200 mg/kg ASA. The ASA + Mel group was injected i.p. with 5 mg/kg melatonin 45 min after administering 200 mg/kg ASA i.p. The Mel + ASA group was injected i.p. with 5 mg/kg melatonin 45 min before administering 200 mg/kg ASA i.p. We found no statistically significant differences in mean histopathological scores in the ASA + Mel group compared to the ASA group. ASA caused shortened villi and loss of the apical villus in the duodenum. The histopathological score was increased and villus height was decreased in the ASA group compared to untreated controls. Treatment with melatonin attenuated the histological damage. In the ASA group, occasional areas showed erosion of villi in the jejunum; however, differences in mean histopathological score in ASA group compared to the other groups were not statistically significant. Malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were measured in stomach, duodenal and jejunum tissue. We found increased MDA activity in both stomach and duodenal tissues in the ASA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). We found no statistically significant changes in MDA levels in jejunal tissue in the ASA group compared to the control group. We found no change in SOD activity in either stomach or duodenal tissues in the ASA group compared to the control group. We observed decreased SOD activity in jejunal tissue in the ASA group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). We detected no change in GSH activity in stomach, duodenal or jejunal tissues in the ASA group compared to the control group. The stomach damage was less in melatonin treated groups, but the lesions were not completely eliminated. The jejunum in the ASA group retained a nearly normal appearance. We found that melatonin exhibited some healing effects on ASA induced duodenal mucosal injury.

The efficacy and safety of cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary stent implantation: a combined clinical study and computational system pharmacology analysis

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is the standard regimen to achieve rapid platelet inhibition and prevent thrombotic events. Currently, little information is available regarding alternative antiplatelet therapy in patients with an allergy or intolerance to aspirin. Although cilostazol is already a common alternative to aspirin in clinical practice in China, its efficacy and safety remain to be determined. We retrospectively analyzed 613 Chinese patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among them, 405 patients received standard DAT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and 205 patients were identified with intolerance to aspirin and received alternative DAT (cilostazol plus clopidogrel). There were no significant differences between the two groups in their baseline clinical characteristics. The main outcomes of the study included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and bleeding events during 12 months of follow-up. The MACEs endpoint was reached in 10 of 205 patients treated with cilostazol (4.9%) and in 34 of 408 patients treated with aspirin (8.3%). No statistically significant difference was observed in MACEs between the two groups. However, patients in the cilostazol group had less restenosis than did patients in the aspirin group (1.5% vs 4.9%, P=0.035). The occurrence of bleeding events tended to be lower in the cilostazol group (0.49% vs 2.7%, P=0.063). These clinical observations were further analyzed using network system pharmacology analysis, and the outcomes were consistent with clinical observations and preclinical data reports. We conclude that in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance undergoing coronary stent implantation, the combination of clopidogrel with cilostazol may be an efficacious and safe alternative to the standard DAT regimen.