[Daily life, pregnancy, and quality of life after liver transplantation]

Evaluation of the quality of life of pregnant women from 2005 to 2015

Over the past two decades, quality of life has become an essential preoccupation in the care of patients. Many measuring instruments are available to assess physical, psychological and social quality of life. These tools allow healthcare professionals to determine the best quality of their patients. However, the quality of life for the pregnant woman seems to be little studied. This article presents the results of a bibliographic review of publications between 2005 and 2015 - referenced in PUBMED and COCHRANE - on the quality of life of pregnant women giving birth after the 22nd week of amenorrhea. The articles were selected by a reading committee. 195 publications responding to keywords were identified. 75 articles on the problem were selected. The main countries that have published on this subject are Iran (n=11) and Brazil (n=9). France ranks 17th with only one publication. 74% of articles deal with quality of life for pathological pregnancies (gestational or pre-existing pathologies). 23 pathologies were identified, mainly depression (20% of items). This review reveals a growing global interest in quality of life in pregnant women. However, few studies evaluate the impact of care in terms of quality of life in pregnant women, contrary to the recommendations of different health authorities. Finally, the analysis of the various articles shows that, in general, few measurements are made to evaluate the quality of life, not requiring a standardized curve of quality of life during pregnancy. There is thus a significant lack of data to establish a standardized curve for the quality of life of pregnant women, which allows a simple comparison of quality of life measures according to the different clinical management.

Quality of life after liver transplantation: State of the art

Quality of life (QoL) after deceased donor liver transplantation is increasingly recognized as a major outcome parameter. We reviewed recent publications in this rapidly evolving field in order to summarize recent achievements in the field and to define opportunities and perspectives for research and improvement of patient care. QoL does improve after liver transplantation according to a typical pattern. During the first year, there is a significant improvement in QoL. After one year, the improvement does stabilise and tends to decline slightly. In addition to the physical condition, different psychological parameters (such as depression, anxiety, sexual function) and sociodemographic elements (professional state, sex, marital state) seem to impact QoL. Opportunities for further research are the use of dedicated questionnaires and identification of influencing factors for QoL.

Liver transplantation: a systematic review of long-term quality of life

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation is the only curative intervention for terminal liver disease. Accurate long-term quality of life (QOL) data are required in the context of improved surgical outcomes and increasing post-transplant survival. This study reviews the long-term QOL after primary liver transplantation in adult patients surviving 5 or more years after surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed for all studies matching the eligibility criteria between January 2000 and October 2013. Bibliographies of included studies were also reviewed. Two authors independently performed screening of titles and abstracts. Consensus for studies included for review was achieved by discussion between authors based on predetermined eligibility criteria. Quality appraisal and data tabulation were performed using predetermined forms. Results were synthesized by narrative review.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies (5402 patients) were included. QOL following liver transplantation remains superior to preoperative status up to 20 years post-operatively. More post-operative complications predicted worse QOL scores especially in physical domains. Benefits in functional domains persist long-term with independence in self-care and mobility. Employment rates recover in the short-term but decline after 5 years, and differ significantly between various aetiologies of liver disease. Overall QOL improves to a similar level as the general population, but physical function remains worse. Participation in post-operative physical activity is associated with superior QOL outcomes in liver transplant recipients compared to the general population. QOL improvements are similar compared to lung, kidney and heart transplantation. Heterogeneity between studies precluded quantitative analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation confers specific long-term QOL and functional benefits when compared to preoperative status. This information can assist in providing a more complete estimate of the overall health of liver transplant recipients and the effectiveness of surgery. Guidelines for future studies are provided.

Quality of life and physical activity in liver transplantation patients: results of a case-control study in Italy

The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and the physical activity of liver transplant recipients compared with the general population. The case-controlled pilot study was accomplished through the administration of 2 questionnaires: 36-item Medical Outcomes Study, Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) for quality of life (10 scores) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to estimate the physical activity (metabolic equivalent score). Fifty-four patients who underwent liver transplantation using the piggyback technique and 108 controls from the general population at the orthopedic ambulatories were enrolled between 2002 and 2009. Participants had a mean age of 55 years (range, 41-73). The multivariate analysis showed significant differences for some scales of the SF-36: liver transplant recipients displayed lower values for "Mental Composite Score" (P = .043), "physical activity" (P = .001), "role limitations due to physical health" (P = .006), "role limitations due to the emotional state" (P = .006), and "mental health" (P = .010). The metabolic equivalent positively associated with all examined SF-36 scales. The present study focused on the QOL and physical activity of liver transplant recipients, demonstrating that transplant recipients scored lower than the general population. Liver transplantation may allow full recovery of health status, but the physical and social problems persist in some patients. Interventions aimed at improving rehabilitation programs, regular psychosocial support, and follow-up in all phases of treatment may give patients a more satisfying lifestyle after transplantation.

[Liver transplantation and pregnancy]

Patients with liver failure have menstrual cycle irregularities or amenorrhea. Liver transplantation restores menstrual pattern among women with cirrhosis in childbearing years. It is now accepted that a planned pregnancy is possible among liver transplant recipients at least 1 year after liver transplantation, with stable allograft function and under immunosuppressive regimens, to minimize the risks of preterm delivery and pregnancy-induced hypertension. After 1 year, the risk of graft loss decreases and is not related to pregnancy. It is a high-risk pregnancy which requires a specific and regular multidisciplinary joint follow-up (obstetrician, hepatologist, and anaesthesiologist), which leads in most cases to successful outcome for mother and child. But, early prevention and multidisciplinary management of the most common complications (pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction) is essential. The prematurity rate, maternal morbidity and mortality are higher than in the general population. Usual immunosuppressive treatments (corticoids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) may require dose adaptation during pregnancy. Immunosuppressive drugs are not teratogenic, but breast feeding is not allowed.

[Liver transplantation and pregnancy]

Management during their sexual life of patients with a liver transplantation is a more or less common situation depending centers. Based on literature review, a focus on management of recipient women was conducted, from contraception to pregnancy, describing the complications related to the status of transplant recipient, but also those that may be related to immunosuppressive agents. If fertility and access to contraception are only slightly modified by graft, complications related to graft or immunosuppressive drugs can affect the pregnancy. On the maternal side, hypertension and preeclampsia are more common, as well as renal dysfunction, iatrogenic diabetes and bacterial or viral infections, acute rejection and graft loss do not appear to be influenced by pregnancy. The fetus is also exposed to risks such as induced prematurity and IUGR. Pregnancy in recipients of hepatic grafts therefore requires joint follow-up by transplant specialist and perinatologist, which leads in most cases to successful outcome for mother and child.