Molecular testing in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: Approaches and challenges

Perioperative Therapy in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Strategies and Unanswered Questions

Perioperative therapy has become a critical component in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in the era of precision medicine. Although molecular testing is standard in metastatic NSCLC, its incorporation into early-stage disease remains essential for guiding treatment decisions. Reflex molecular testing pathways are necessary to optimize tissue utilization and ensure timely results. However, liquid biopsies, although valuable in advanced disease, have limited sensitivity in early-stage NSCLC, reinforcing the need for tissue-based next-generation sequencing. Targeted therapies have revolutionized treatment for oncogene-driven NSCLC, with adjuvant osimertinib now standard for EGFR-mutant disease and ongoing investigations into ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, unanswered questions remain regarding the inclusion of perioperative TKI therapy, the role of molecular residual disease assessment, and whether specific TKIs offer greater benefit for high-risk subgroups. The role of immunotherapy (IO) in oncogene-driven NSCLC remains controversial. Although perioperative chemo-IO has demonstrated survival benefits in unselected NSCLC, its efficacy in EGFR, ALK, and other actionable alterations is unclear. Tumors harboring KRAS and BRAF mutations may respond better because of a more immune-inflamed microenvironment, and remains an active area of investigation. As the landscape of perioperative therapy continues to evolve, ongoing trials will help define the optimal integration of targeted therapies and IO in oncogene-driven NSCLC. Addressing these unanswered questions will be crucial in refining treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Molecular testing of lung cancer in Australia: consensus best practice recommendations from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia in collaboration with the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australasia

Molecular testing plays a critical role in guiding optimal treatment decisions for lung cancer patients across a variety of clinical settings. While guidelines for biomarker testing exist in other jurisdictions, to date no best practice guidelines have been developed for the Australian setting. To address this need, the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia collaborated with the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australasia to identify state-based pathologists, oncologists and consumer representatives to develop consensus best practice recommendations. Sixteen recommendations were established encompassing appropriate biomarkers, lung cancer subtype, tumour stage, specimen types, assay selection and quality assurance protocols that can inform and standardise best practice in molecular testing of lung cancer. These multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations are designed to standardise and enhance molecular testing practices for lung cancers and should help ensure laboratories provide high-quality molecular testing of lung cancer for all Australians, including those from regional or remote communities.

Proposal of real-world solutions for the implementation of predictive biomarker testing in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer

The implementation of biomarker testing for targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors is a cornerstone in the management of metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), playing a pivotal role in guiding treatment decisions and patient care. The emergence of precision medicine in the realm of operable NSCLC has been marked by the recent approvals of osimertinib, atezolizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and alectinib for early-stage disease, signifying a shift towards more tailored therapeutic strategies. Concurrently, the landscape of this disease is rapidly evolving, with several further pending approvals and numerous clinical trials in progress. To harness the benefits of these innovative neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapies, the integration of predictive biomarker testing into standard clinical protocols is imperative for patients with operable NSCLC. A multidisciplinary international consortium has identified three primary obstacles impeding the effective testing of patients with operable NSCLC. These challenges encompass the limited number of test requests by physicians, the inadequacy of tissue samples for comprehensive testing, and the prevalence of cost-reduction measures leading to suboptimal testing practices. This review delineates the aforementioned challenges and proposed solutions, and strategic recommendations aimed at enhancing the testing process. By addressing these issues, we strive to optimize patient outcomes in operable NSCLC, ensuring that individuals receive the most appropriate and effective care based on their unique disease profile.

EGFR status assessment using reflex testing targeted next-generation sequencing for resected non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

EGFR status assessment is mandatory for adjuvant decision-making of resected stage IB-IIIA non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). It is questionable whether single-gene RT-PCR versus next-generation sequencing (NGS) should be used for this evaluation. Moreover, co-occurring mutations have an impact on tumor behavior and may influence future therapeutic decision-making. We aimed to describe the clinico-pathological and molecular features, as well as the prognostic factors of resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC evaluated with reflex NGS and RT-PCR, so as to compare the results of the two methods. We retrospectively included and collected data from patients with resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC diagnosed in our institution between 2005 and 2024. Additional cases from another center were included. Tumors were analyzed using targeted NGS and RT-PCR. A total of 153 patients were selected. The median follow-up after surgery was 22 months. The positive percent agreement of RT-PCR compared to NGS for the detection of an EGFR mutation was 88%. Common single EGFR mutations (L858R/del19) were observed in 117/153 (77%) cases; 22/153 (14%) and 14/153 (9%) cases had uncommon single and compound EGFR mutations, respectively. 63/153 (41%) patients had a co-occurring mutation, including a TP53 mutation in 43/63 (68%) co-mutated patients. EGFR/TP53-mutant tumors were associated with positive PD-L1 expression compared to EGFR-mutant/TP53-wild-type tumors (62% vs 39%; p = 0.006). Shorter median event-free survival (EFS) in patients with an EGFR exon 18 mutation and those with TP53 exon 7 co-mutation was recorded. The EGFR status should be systematically evaluated using targeted NGS reflex testing for resected NS-NSCLC since future therapeutic decision-making could soon consider integrating the presence of co-occurring mutations.

Genomic alterations associated with early-stage disease and early recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The molecular characterization of early-stage (1-3) colorectal cancer (CRC) remains incomplete, as opposed to metastatic disease, where comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is routinely performed. This study aimed to characterize the genomics of stages 1-3 versus IV CRC, and the genomics of patients recurring within 1 year of diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from a de-identified CRC clinico-genomic database who received Foundation Medicine testing (FoundationOne/FoundationOne CDx) during routine clinical care at approximately 280 US cancer clinics between March 2014 and June 2023 were included. Genomic alterations (GA) were compared by Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 4702 patients were included; 1902 with stages 1-3 and 2800 with stage 4 disease. Among patients with stages 1-3 disease, 546 recurred within 1 year. Patients staged 1-3 had higher prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI-H, 11.4% vs 4.5%, P < .001), tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥ 10 Mut/Mb (14.6% vs 6.8%, P < .001), GA in RNF43 (11.2% vs 5.7%, P < .001), MSH6 (3.9% vs 1.7%, P < .001), MLH1 (2.3% vs 0.7%, P < .001), and MSH2 (1.5% vs 0.6%, P < .01) compared to those with stage 4 disease. Patients who recurred within 1 year had higher prevalence of MSI-H (13.2% vs 4.4%, P < .001), TMB ≥ 10 Mut/Mb (16.2% vs 6.9%, P < .001), BRAF V600E (17.2% vs 7.9%, P < .003), GA in RNF43 (13.7% vs 5.3%, P < .001), MSH6 (4.2% vs 1.6%, P = .035), and BRCA1/2 (6.2% vs 3.0%, P = .030). On recurrence, more patients received targeted therapy when CGP was performed before versus after first-line therapy (43% vs 19%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early-stage CRC patients can have distinct genomic profiles and CGP in this population can help expand access to targeted therapies.

Investigating lung cancer microenvironment from cell segmentation of pathological image and its application in prognostic stratification

Lung cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma, ranks high in morbidity and mortality rates worldwide, with a relatively low five-year survival rate. To achieve precise prognostic assessment and clinical intervention for patients, thereby enhancing their survival prospects, there is an urgent need for more accurate stratification schemes. Currently, the TNM staging system is predominantly used in clinical practice for prognostic evaluation, but its accuracy is constrained by the reliance on physician experience. Although biomarker discovery based on molecular pathology offers a new perspective for prognostic assessment, its dependence on expensive gene panel testing limits its widespread clinical application. Pathological images contain abundant diagnostic information, providing a new avenue for prognostic evaluation. In this study, we employed advanced Hover-Net technology to accurately quantify the abundance of epithelial cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils from pathological images, and delved into the clinical and biological significance of these cellular abundances. Our research findings reveal that, in contrast to patients classified as N0 stage, those belonging to the N1 stage demonstrated a marked elevation in the infiltration of epithelial cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Notably, the infiltration patterns of lymphocytes and neutrophils exhibited an inverse relationship with the activation status of numerous pivotal gene pathways, including the HALLMARK_HEME_METABOLISM pathway. Furthermore, our analysis distinguished FABP7 as a prognostic biomarker, exhibiting pronounced differential expression between patients with high and low levels of neutrophil infiltration, indicate that cellular abundance analysis based on pathological images can provide a more accurate and cost-effective prognostic evaluation, offering new strategies for the clinical management of lung adenocarcinoma.

Challenges in implementation of molecular classification in early stage endometrial cancer-An NRG Oncology cooperative group mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Professional guidelines recommend molecular profiling for mismatch repair (MMR), p53, and polymerase epsilon (POLE) status in endometrial cancer (EC). However, adoption in the United States has not been documented, and barriers to the implementation of testing have not been described.

METHODS

In this mixed-methods study, implementation science frameworks were used to develop a quantitative survey. Gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists affiliated with NRG Oncology programs were contacted through snowball sampling and were surveyed during 2022-2023. A subset of respondents was interviewed. Statistical and thematic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At least 403 NRG Oncology-affiliated providers were contacted for the survey, and 107 (26.6%) responded. Greater than 90% of respondents perceived POLE, MMR, and p53 status as important for clinical care. MMR and p53 tests were perceived as easy to obtain, but only 24.2% of respondents reported that POLE testing was moderately or very easy to obtain. Respondents from academic sites reported better access to molecular classification and perceived greater importance of molecular classification compared with respondents from community sites. In thematic analysis of 13 qualitative interviews, cost concerns were reported as large barriers to testing. Interviewees reported a desire for prospective data to guide treatment selection based on classification results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although integrating molecular classification into standard pathologic reporting is recommended, and clinicians perceive molecular profiling in early stage EC as important, survey respondents noted significant implementation barriers. Implementation challenges that differ between community oncology and academic practice settings were identified. Strategies to improve equitable access to molecular classification of early stage EC are needed.

The Detailed Analysis of Polish Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Through Insights from Molecular Testing (POL-MOL Study)

Molecular testing is recommended in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the extent of its use in Poland is unknown. The aim of the POL-MOL study was to investigate the frequency of using molecular testing in Polish patients with NSCLC. The invited Polish oncologists completed two questionnaires, and data for 1001 patients undergoing systemic treatment for NSCLC were collected. The use of molecular tests for the following genetic mutations was recorded: EGFR (del19, sub21), EGFR (other than del19/sub21), EGFR T790M, ALK (expression and rearrangement), RET, NTRK, ROS1, BRAF, HER2, and MET, as well as for immunochemical assessment of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Thanks to the weighting procedure, the results are representative of the population of Polish patients treated for NSCLC. Molecular tests were applied in 78% of patients with NSCL, 70% of patients with NSCLC not otherwise specified, and in 12% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. The frequency of application increased with disease stage in all groups. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, approximately 30% of tests for EGFR, ALK, and RET mutations were positive, which confirms the importance of testing at least a preselected subgroup of patients.

Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Testing in a Population-Based Lung Cancer Surgical Resection Cohort from 2018 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Biomarker-directed therapy requires biomarker testing. We assessed the patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) testing in a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection cohort. We hypothesized that testing would increase but be unevenly distributed across patient-, provider- and institution-level demographics.

METHODS

We examined the population-based Mid-South Quality of Surgical Resection (MS-QSR) cohort of NSCLC resections. We evaluated the proportions receiving EGFR and PDL1 testing before and after approval of biomarker-directed adjuvant therapy (2018-2020 vs. 2021-2022). We used association tests and logistic regression to compare factors.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2022, 1,687 patients had NSCLC resection across 12 MS-QSR institutions: 1,045 (62%) from 2018 to 2020 and 642 (38%) from 2021 to 2022. From 2018 to 2020, 11% had EGFR testing versus 38% in 2021 to 2022 (56% in those meeting ADAURA trial inclusion criteria, P < 0.0001). From 2018 to 2020, 8% had PDL1 testing versus 20% in 2021 to 2022 (P < 0.0001). EGFR testing did not significantly differ by age (P = 0.07), sex (P = 0.99), race (P = 0.33), or smoking history (P = 0.28); PDL1 testing did not differ significantly by age (P = 0.47), sex (P = 0.41), race (P = 0.51), or health insurance (P = 0.07). Testing was significantly less likely in nonteaching and non-Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals and after resection by cardiothoracic or general surgeons (vs. general thoracic surgeons; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR and PDL1 testing increased after approval of biomarker-directed adjuvant therapies. However, testing rates were still suboptimal and differed by institutional- and provider-level factors.

IMPACT

The association of institutional, pathologist, and surgeon characteristics with differences in testing demonstrate the need for more standardization in testing processes.

Case report: Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant brigatinib in stage III non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement

Purpose

The use of neoadjuvant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has not been extensively explored. The current case report highlights the notable pathological complete response (pCR) achieved following neoadjuvant brigatinib therapy in a patient with stage IIIA ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Case presentation

A 32-year-old male presented with incidental lung lesions, ultimately diagnosed as clinical stage T3N1M0, IIIA NSCLC with an ALK gene rearrangement. Following a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient opted for neoadjuvant brigatinib therapy, which significantly reduced the tumor size. Subsequently, surgery with curative intent was performed, revealing pCR with no residual tumor cells. The patient remained disease-free during a 13-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

This case report provides compelling evidence of pCR following brigatinib therapy in ALK-positive NSCLC, suggesting that surgery after neoadjuvant therapy with brigatinib may offer a safe and effective approach for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

A local perspective on internal, external, and reflexive biomarker testing processes for lung cancer in an academic medical center

In a large academic medical center, processes for ordering and receiving biomarker testing to inform cancer treatment in non–small cell lung cancer varied by whether tests were conducted internally or externally. Lack of standardization in biomarker testing processes, despite the availability of electronic health record solutions, contributes to clinician burden and may increase risk of delays in receipt of testing results; therefore, efforts to streamline ordering processes may benefit health systems.

Targeted treatment for unresectable EGFR mutation-positive stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Emerging evidence and future perspectives

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in up to one third of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC is consolidation durvalumab for patients who have not progressed following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (the 'PACIFIC regimen'). However, the benefit of immunotherapy, specifically in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) tumors, is not well characterized, and this treatment approach is not recommended in these patients, based on a recent ESMO consensus statement. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. The benefits of these agents have also translated to patients with EGFRm early-stage resectable disease as adjuvant therapy. The role of EGFR-TKIs has yet to be prospectively characterized in the unresectable setting. Preliminary efficacy signals for EGFR-TKIs in unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC have been reported from a limited number of subgroup and retrospective studies. Several clinical trials are ongoing assessing the safety and efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in this patient population. Here, we review the current management of unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC. We outline the rationale for investigating EGFR-TKI strategies in this setting and discuss ongoing studies. Finally, we discuss the evidence gaps and future challenges for treating patients with unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC.

Practical challenges in lung cancer pathology: bedside care to treatment decisions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the whole world, and the pulmonologist is generally the first medical professional to meet the patient and decide what method of tumour sampling is preferable in each specific case. It is imperative for pulmonary physicians to be aware of the intricacies of the diagnostic process, and understand the multiple challenges that are encountered, from the moment the tissue specimen leaves their offices and is sent to the pathology laboratory, until the diagnosis reaches the patient and treating physician.

RECENT FINDINGS

The new 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumours recommended a minimum immunohistochemical (IHC) diagnostic panel for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and following publications of different institutional and country-based guidelines, advocated basic molecular testing for epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to be initiated by the diagnosing pathologist in all cases of biopsy or resection specimens. In general, sequential testing for molecular biomarkers was not recommended due to tissue wastage, instead next generation sequencing (NGS) diagnostic panel was supported.

SUMMARY

The lung cancer specimen has to undergo histologic diagnosis through a panel of IHC studies, and -preferably, a reflex molecular study by NGS including several targetable genes. Adequate communication and clinical information preclude the pathologist from "overusing" the tissue for additional studies, while focusing on preservation of material for molecular testing.

Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Resectable NSCLC: Current and Future Perspectives

The standard of care (SoC) for medically operable patients with early-stage (stages I-IIIB) NSCLC is surgery combined with (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with stages II to IIIB disease and some stage IB or, rarely, chemoradiation (stage III disease with mediastinal lymph node metastases). Despite these treatments, metastatic recurrence is common and associated with poor survival, highlighting the need for systemic therapies that are more effective than the current SoC. After the success of targeted therapy (TT) in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers, these agents are being investigated for the perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC. Adjuvant osimertinib is the only TT approved for use in the early-stage setting, and there are no approved neoadjuvant TTs. We discuss the importance of comprehensive biomarker testing at diagnosis to identify individuals who may benefit from neoadjuvant targeted treatments and review emerging data from neoadjuvant TT trials. We also address the potential challenges for establishing neoadjuvant TTs as SoC in the early-stage setting, including the identification and validation of early response markers to guide care and accelerate drug development, and discuss safety considerations in the perioperative setting. Initial data indicate that neoadjuvant TTs are effective and well tolerated in patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive early-stage NSCLC. Data from ongoing trials will determine whether neoadjuvant targeted agents will become a new SoC for individuals with oncogene-addicted resectable NSCLC.

Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic value of TLR from PET/CT in patients with resection margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare high-risk factors necessitating adjuvant treatment (AT).

METHODS

Consecutive FDG PET/CT scans performed for the initial staging of NSCLC stage IB and IIA were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor and mean SUV of the liver were acquired. The tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR) was also calculated. Charts were reviewed for basic patient characteristics and high-risk factors for considering AT (poor differentiation, visceral pleura invasion, vascular invasion, tumors > 4 cm, and wedge resection). Statistical analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients included, 15 (13.4%) died, with a median overall survival (OS) of 43.8 months. Twenty-two patients (19.6%) exhibited recurrence, with median disease-free survival (DFS) of 36.0 months. In univariable analysis, pathology, poor differentiation, and TLR were associated with shorter DFS and OS. In multivariable analysis, TLR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.263, p = 0.008) and differentiation (HR = 3.087, p = 0.012) were associated with shorter DFS. Also, TLR (HR = 1.422, p < 0.001) was associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and survival. PET parameters constitute risk factors for consideration in the decision-making for AT in margin-negative stage IB and IIA NSCLC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In this study, TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA non-small cell cancer patients. Although additional validation studies are warranted, TLR has the potential to be used to determine the need for adjuvant therapy.

KEY POINTS

• High TLR is an independent poor prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA NSCLC. • Adjuvant treatment should be considered in patients with high TLR following complete tumor resection.

Analytic validation of NeXT Dx™, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay

We describe the analytic validation of NeXT Dx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay to aid therapy and clinical trial selection for patients diagnosed with solid tumor cancers. Proprietary methods were utilized to perform whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing for detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), copy number alterations (CNAs), and gene fusions, and determination of tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability. Variant calling is enhanced by sequencing a patient-specific normal sample from, for example, a blood specimen. This provides highly accurate somatic variant calls as well as the incidental reporting of pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline alterations. Fusion detection via RNA sequencing provides more extensive and accurate fusion calling compared to DNA-based tests. NeXT Dx features the proprietary Accuracy and Content Enhanced technology, developed to optimize sequencing and provide more uniform coverage across the exome. The exome was validated at a median sequencing depth of >500x. While variants from 401 cancer-associated genes are currently reported from the assay, the exome/transcriptome assay is broadly validated to enable reporting of additional variants as they become clinically relevant. NeXT Dx demonstrated analytic sensitivities as follows: SNVs (99.4%), indels (98.2%), CNAs (98.0%), and fusions (95.8%). The overall analytic specificity was >99.0%.

Clinical Applications of Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Scope: Challenges and Opportunities

Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) has been widely used to stage lung tumors and to diagnose mediastinal diseases. In the last decade, this procedure has evolved in several technical aspects, with new tools available to optimize tissue sampling and to increase its diagnostic yield, like elastography, different types of needles and, most recently, miniforceps and cryobiopsy. Accordingly, the indications for the use of the EBUS scope into the airways to perform the Endobronchial Ultrasound-TransBronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has also extended beyond the endobronchial and thoracic boundaries to sample lesions from the liver, left adrenal gland and retroperitoneal lymph nodes via the gastroesophageal tract, performing the Endoscopic UltraSound with Bronchoscope-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-B-FNA). In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the main indication for the use of the EBUS scope, even the more uncommon, to underline its utility and versatility in clinical practice.

Pathologist-initiated reflex testing for biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: expert consensus on the rationale and considerations for implementation

Biomarker tests in lung cancer have been traditionally ordered by the treating oncologist upon confirmation of an appropriate pathological diagnosis. The delay this introduces prolongs yet further what is already a complex, multi-stage, pre-treatment pathway and delays the start of first-line systemic treatment, which is crucially informed by the results of such analysis. Reflex testing, in which the responsibility for testing for an agreed range of biomarkers lies with the pathologist, has been shown to standardise and expedite the process. Twelve experts discussed the rationale and considerations for implementing reflex testing as standard clinical practice.

NSCLC in the Era of Targeted and Immunotherapy: What Every Pulmonologist Must Know

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has dramatically changed over the last decade through the use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Implementation of these treatment regimens relies on detailed knowledge regarding each tumor’s specific genomic profile, underscoring the necessity of obtaining superior diagnostic tissue specimens. While these treatment approaches are commonly utilized in the metastatic setting, approval among earlier-stage disease will continue to rise, highlighting the importance of early and comprehensive biomarker testing at the time of diagnosis for all patients. Pulmonologists play an integral role in the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer via sophisticated tissue sampling techniques. This multifaceted review will highlight current indications for the use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in non-small cell lung cancer and will outline the quality of various diagnostic approaches and subsequent success of tissue biomarker testing. Pulmonologist-specific methods, including endobronchial ultrasound and guided bronchoscopy, will be examined as well as other modalities such as CT-guided transthoracic biopsy and more.

Reaching multidisciplinary consensus on the management of non-bulky/non-infiltrative stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. In this modified Delphi study from France, we aimed to generate agreement through multidisciplinary decision-making on the clinical management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative N2 NSCLC.

METHODS

An expert panel of 30 physicians from different specialities completed two Delphi rounds of a 76-item questionnaire, pertaining to: pathological confirmation of N2 disease; initial treatment approach; treatment approach in case of disease progression/stability following neoadjuvant chemotherapy; treatment approach taking into account various patient and tumour characteristics. Each questionnaire item was scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus in agreement was achieved if ≥ 80 % of responses to a questionnaire item were scored between 7 and 9 and if the median value of the score to the item was ≥ 7.

RESULTS

Regarding the pathologic confirmation of N2 disease, agreement (up to 100 %) was reached on endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound as the preferred method of initial mediastinal staging for paratracheal lymph nodes. There was also panellist agreement (up to 93 %) on the adoption as first-line treatment of surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with single-station disease, and of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant immunotherapy in those with multi-station N2 disease. Panellists further agreed on the use of a non-surgical strategy, i.e., concurrent chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant immunotherapy, in patients with single-station N2 disease in case of: involvement of ≥ 2 mediastinal lymph nodes; disease progression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy; compromised cardiopulmonary function if compatible with radiotherapy; anticipated right pneumonectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study reinforces the importance of multidisciplinary discussions leading to the best individual approach to the clinical management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative N2 NSCLC, a challenging heterogeneous population.

Utility of ctDNA Liquid Biopsies from Cancer Patients: An Institutional Study of 285 ctDNA Samples

Liquid biopsy has improved significantly over the last decade and is attracting attention as a tool that can complement tissue biopsy to evaluate the genetic landscape of solid tumors. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of liquid biopsy in daily oncology practice in different clinical contexts. We studied ctDNA and tissue biopsy to investigate EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations from 199 cancer patients between January 2016 and March 2021. The study included 114 male and 85 female patients with a median age of 68 years. A total of 122 cases were lung carcinoma, 53 were colorectal carcinoma, and 24 were melanoma. Liquid biopsy was positive for a potentially druggable driver mutation in 14 lung and colorectal carcinoma where tissue biopsy was not performed, and in two (3%) lung carcinoma patients whose tissue biopsy was negative. Liquid biopsy identified nine (45%) de novo EGFR-T790M mutations during TKI-treatment follow-up in lung carcinoma. BRAF-V600 mutation resurgence was detected in three (12.5%) melanoma patients during follow-up. Our results confirm the value of liquid biopsy in routine clinical oncologic practice for targeted therapy, diagnosis of resistance to treatment, and cancer follow-up.

Implementing Genomic Testing for Lung Cancer Into Routine Clinical Practice - The Welsh Experience

AIMS

Over the last decade there has been a rapid expansion of clinically actionable driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with an unprecedented number of corresponding targeted therapies approved and funded for use in the clinic. Here we summarise the approach taken in Wales to embed a NSCLC biomarker testing pathway within the National Optimal Pathway for Lung Cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Welsh Thoracic Oncology Group established a working group tasked with progressing the standardisation of genomic testing. In July 2021, the 10 lung cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) were invited to take part in a national survey of current biomarker testing practices and a retrospective audit of the next generation sequencing (NGS) pathway in Wales was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of MDTs completed the survey, which confirmed variability in the approach to testing with respect to timing of requests, patient selection and testing technologies used. Only 43% reported having pathology-initiated reflex testing, but 87% had adopted DNA and RNA NGS testing as their standard-of-care genomic testing strategy. Data from 53 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC with genomic testing requested between October 2020 and May 2021 were analysed in the NGS pathway audit. Forty (75.5%) patients had both DNA and RNA NGS requested, with a median turnaround time from biopsy to results of 26 days (range 19-37 days) and 25 days (range 16-38 days), respectively. The geographical location of MDT did not influence turnaround times and MDTs with reflex testing had shorter biopsy-to-result times. DNA NGS testing was successful in 51 (96.2%) patients; in those who had RNA NGS, testing was successful in 30 (75%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Significant progress has been made within Wales to implement a national biomarker testing pathway, with reflex testing becoming standard of care. However, challenges remain in optimising the quantity and quality of tissue available for testing, together with a need to reduce turnaround times. This will need to be addressed to ensure all eligible patients are tested at the right time in the diagnostic pathway to facilitate optimal treatment strategies and ultimately improve outcomes.

Landscape of Genomic Alterations and PD-L1 Expression in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)-A Single Center, Retrospective Observational Study

Precision oncology and immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emerging studies show that targeted therapies are also beneficial for patients with driver alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in early-stage NSCLC (stages I-IIIA). Furthermore, patients with elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression appear to respond favorably to adjuvant immunotherapy. To determine the frequency of genomic alterations and PD-L1 status in early-stage NSCLC, we retrospectively analyzed data from 2066 unselected, single-center patients with NSCLC diagnosed using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Nine-hundred and sixty-two patients (46.9%) presented with early-stage NSCLC. Of these, 37.0% had genomic alterations for which targeted therapies have already been approved for advanced NSCLC. The frequencies of driver mutations in the early stages were equivalent to those in advanced stages, i.e., the rates of EGFR mutations in adenocarcinomas were 12.7% (72/567) and 12.0% (78/650) in early and advanced NSCLC, respectively (p = 0778). In addition, 46.3% of early-stage NSCLC cases were PD-L1-positive, with a tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%. With comparable frequencies of driver mutations in early and advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 overexpression in nearly half of patients with early-stage NSCLC, a broad spectrum of biomarkers for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is available, and several are currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Molecular Profiling in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Towards a Switch to Next-Generation Sequencing Reflex Testing

Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer is a constantly evolving field thanks to major advances in precision oncology. The wide range of actionable molecular alterations in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) and the multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to treatment resulted in the need for repeated testing to establish an accurate molecular diagnosis, as well as to track disease evolution over time. While assessing the increasing complexity of the molecular composition of tumors at baseline, as well as over time, has become increasingly challenging, the emergence and implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has extensively facilitated molecular profiling in NS-NSCLC. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the molecular profiling of NS-NSCLC and how NGS addresses current needs, as well as how it can be implemented to address future challenges in the management of NS-NSCLC.

Assessing Oncologists’ Attitudes Concerning Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma in Brazil

Introduction

Advances in comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) led to personalized treatment for patients. This study evaluated medical oncologists’ attitudes toward CGP in a scenario where sponsored funding for CGP was available.

Methods

We designed an online survey assessing CGP use and treating physicians’ confidence, composed of three self-confidence domains, which are as follows: confidence in interpreting CGP results, confidence in treating oncogenic-driven LUAD, and confidence in managing tyrosine kinase inhibitor adverse events. The survey was distributed to medical oncologists who treat lung cancer in Brazil. Comparisons between groups were performed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted OR) analyses were performed.

Results

Among 104 respondents who treat patients with lung cancer, 55% were from the Southeast region, 28% had high lung cancer clinical load, and 33% had in-house molecular testing. More than half (51%) of the participants request CGP systematically to stage IV LUAD. As for provider confidence, 67% stated being confident in all three domains: 76% confident in interpreting CGP, 84% confident in treating oncogenic-driven LUAD, and 81% in managing tyrosine kinase inhibitor adverse events. Providers’ confidence was associated with systematically requesting CGP to stage IV LUAD (p = 0.013). After controlling for the variables of interest, systematic requesting CGP for stage IV LUAD revealed a significant association with the provider’s confidence (adjusted OR = 0.35, p = 0.028, 95% CI: 0.14–0.84). The major challenge for properly requesting CGP was the long turnaround time and the fear of treatment delays.

Conclusions

Even though CGP for stage IV LUAD in Brazil is fully sponsored, only half of the oncologists in our survey systematically request it.. Requesting CGP was associated with providers’ confidence. Improving access and promoting providers’ awareness of CGP utility is necessary to increase CGP use and better inform treatment decisions.

Targeted Therapy in Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved tumor response rates and survival benefits in advanced oncogenic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the impressive success, a renewed interest has been raised in the study of these agents in the perioperative setting. Preliminary data have shown dramatic effectiveness compared to conventional chemotherapy. Given the explicit need to induce durable responses and raise cure rates, we summarize the current progression, identify key challenges, and raise potential opportunities for perioperative targeted therapy that range from precise biomarkers to optimal adjuvant regimens for individual patients. As perioperative treatment indeed provides researchers with a unique platform to address the challenges mentioned above, investigators could obtain a comprehensive analysis of genomic profiling and trace resistance mechanisms. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adaptive clinical trial designs are warranted to integrate translational research into personalized perioperative TKI treatment paradigms.

Results of screening in early and advanced thoracic malignancies in the EORTC pan-European SPECTAlung platform

Access to a comprehensive molecular alteration screening is patchy in Europe and quality of the molecular analysis varies. SPECTAlung was created in 2015 as a pan-European screening platform for patients with thoracic malignancies. Here we report the results of almost 4 years of prospective molecular screening of patients with thoracic malignancies, in terms of quality of the program and molecular alterations identified. Patients with thoracic malignancies at any stage of disease were recruited in SPECTAlung, from June 2015 to May 2019, in 7 different countries. Molecular tumour boards were organised monthly to discuss patients' molecular and clinical profile and possible biomarker-driven treatments, including clinical trial options. FFPE material was collected and analysed for 576 patients with diagnosis of pleural, lung, or thymic malignancies. Ultimately, 539 patients were eligible (93.6%) and 528 patients were assessable (91.7%). The turn-around time for report generation and molecular tumour board was 214 days (median). Targetable molecular alterations were observed in almost 20% of cases, but treatment adaptation was low (3% of patients). SPECTAlung showed the feasibility of a pan-European screening platform. One fifth of the patients had a targetable molecular alteration. Some operational issues were discovered and adapted to improve efficiency.

Barriers to Access: Global Variability in Implementing Treatment Advances in Lung Cancer

Globally, lung cancer is the second most-diagnosed cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death. Advances in science and technology have contributed to improvements in primary cancer prevention, cancer diagnosis, and cancer therapy, leading to an increase in survival and improvement in quality of life. Many of these advances have been seen in high-income countries. Accessibility, availability, and affordability are key domains in barriers to access of care between countries and within countries. The impact of these domains, as they relate to molecular testing, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy, are discussed.