Efficacy of ascorbic acid on processing characteristics and lipid oxidation of pre-rigor salted chicken breasts during vacuum refrigerated storage

Changes in the Quality Attributes of Selected Long-Life Food at Four Different Temperatures over Prolonged Storage

This study reports the development of selected indicators affecting changes in food quality and safety of selected long-life canned (Szeged goulash, canned chicken meat, pork pâté, canned tuna fish) and dehydrated (instant goulash soup) food during a two-year storage experiment at four different temperatures. The storage temperatures were selected to represent Arctic (−18 °C), temperate (5 °C), subtropical (25 °C) and tropical (40 °C) climatic zones where such food is likely to be stored during, for example, humanitarian and military missions. Microorganism amounts below the detection limit (p < 0.05), regardless of the storage temperature (p ≥ 0.05), were monitored in canned samples. The contents of dry matter, fat and proteins did not change during storage, regardless of the storage temperature (p ≥ 0.05). During the 24-month storage, all food showed an increase in the level of ammonia (p < 0.05) and the TBARS-value (p < 0.05), whereas the rate of increase in both parameters was significantly higher at higher storage temperatures (p < 0.05). The losses of individual amino acids during storage ranged from 5% rel. calculated on the amino acid contents in Month “0” up to 15% rel. (p < 0.05). With storage temperatures above the freezing point, the hardness values decreased with the increase in the storage temperature (p < 0.05) and prolongation of the storage period (p < 0.05). Moreover, with temperatures of −18 °C, the development of hardness, measured as the “decrease rate”, was significantly higher compared to the absolute values.

Variation in the terminology and methodologies applied to the analysis of water holding capacity in meat research

Studies examining meat quality variation, possibly resulting from animal physiology, processing, or ingredient additions, are likely to include at least one measure of water holding capacity (WHC). Methods for evaluating WHC can be classified as direct or indirect. Direct methods either gauge natural release of fluids from muscle or require the application of force to express water. The indirect methods do not actually measure WHC. They attempt to separate meat into two or three categories based on predictions of direct method results: the extreme of high and low WHC and an optional 'normal' group. Considerable statistical analyses are required to generate these predictive models. Presently, there are inconsistent terms (e.g., water holding, WHC, water binding, water binding potential/capacity) used to describe WHC and no standardized techniques recommended to evaluate it. To ensure that results can be compared across different laboratories, a better consensus must be reached in how these terms are employed and how this critical parameter is determined.