Jeon IH, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Ulnar component surface finish influenced the outcome of primary Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;
21:1229-35. [PMID:
22104128 DOI:
10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.062]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2011] [Accepted: 08/28/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Controversy remains regarding the mechanisms leading to ulnar loosening after elbow replacement. We therefore assessed the loosening rate of the ulnar component as a function of the surface finish of a commonly used implant design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 3 groups who received implants with 3 different surface finishes: sintered beads (278 components), polymethylmethacrylate precoating (219 components), and plasma-sprayed beads (205 components).
RESULTS
The 3 groups who received the implants did not differ statistically in age, sex, or underlying diagnosis. The rates of mechanical failure for the sintered, precoated, and plasma-sprayed ulnar components were 6.8%, 12.8%, and 0%, respectively. The 7-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates free of mechanical failure were 93.1% for the sintered-beads group, 83.1% for the precoated group, and 100% for the plasma-sprayed group. Failed precoated ulnar components often failed early and exhibited typical features, including proximal debonding and severe focal or global osteolysis, sometimes leading to periprosthetic insufficiency fractures.
CONCLUSION
Precoating the ulnar component with polymethylmethacrylate can lead to an increased rate of loosening and severe osteolysis. A plasma-sprayed ulnar component is associated with a very low mechanical failure rate with surveillance of less than 10 years.
Collapse