Predation facilitates the abundance of biofouling non-indigenous species in estuarine marinas in NE Atlantic Portugal

The proximity to marine infrastructure affects fish diversity, the occurrence of non-indigenous species, and the dynamic of the sessile communities

Marine urbanization is changing coastal ecosystems. In this study, we examined how the proximity to recreational marinas influences the structure and recruitment of the sessile community, the diversity of fish, and predation pressure. Sessile communities on marinas supported 68 % more non-indigenous species than those farther from marine infrastructure. Conversely, native species occupied more space in natural habitats, where the diversity of fish was greater. Predation did not influence the diversity or structure of the sessile community, regardless of the habitat type. Nevertheless, predation pressure may be underestimated in artificial habitats due to the lack of connection between platforms and the seafloor. Sessile recruitment tended to be more abundant in artificial habitats. Our findings indicate that even when substrate composition, orientation, and connectivity to the seabed are standardized, proximity to marine infrastructure increases the prevalence of non-indigenous sessile species and diminishes the diversity of potential predatory fish, thereby altering the dynamics of sessile communities.

A reciprocal transplant approach to predation in fouling communities found in natural and artificial habitats

Human influence along the coastline is a significant threat to biodiversity and includes the alteration or replacement of natural habitat with artificial structures. Infrastructure such as docks and marinas are common throughout the world and typically have negative impacts on coastal flora and fauna. Impacts include the reduction of native biodiversity, the increase of introduced species, and the alteration of biotic interactions (e.g., predation). Many studies examine human disturbance on biotic interactions within a single habitat (i.e., docks or marinas) but what lacks are paired comparisons using standardized methods of biotic interactions between artificial and nearby natural habitats. In the current study, benthic fouling communities were allowed to develop, with and without predator access, in artificial and seagrass habitats. Cages were used to reduce predation and removed to expose communities to fish predators. Prior to exposure, communities were either left at their original site or transplanted to the opposite habitat and changes in the percent cover of species found were compared. Initially, community composition differed between habitats and when predation was reduced (caged vs. open). When developed communities within cages were exposed to predators, predation was strong but only in artificial habitats and regardless of where communities originated. In contrast, little predation occurred at seagrass sites on previously caged communities developed within seagrass beds or that were transplanted from artificial habitat. Taken together, results indicate that the strength of biotic interactions can differ depending on habitat, leading to changes in community composition. With the continuous expansion of artificial structures world-wide, it is becoming increasingly important to understand not only their effects on biotic interactions and biodiversity but also how these effects extend and compare to adjacent natural habitats.

Exploring foraging preference of local fish species towards non-indigenous fouling communities near marinas: Insights from Remote Video Foraging System (RVFS) trials

Non-indigenous species (NIS) spread from marinas to natural environments is influenced by niche availability, habitat suitability, and local biotic resistance. This study explores the effect of indigenous fish feeding behaviour on NIS proliferation using fouling communities, pre-grown on settlement plates, as two distinct, representative models: one from NIS-rich marinas and the other from areas outside marinas with fewer NIS. These plates were mounted on a Remote Video Foraging System (RVFS) near three marinas on Madeira Island. After 24-h, NIS abundance was reduced by 3.5 %. Canthigaster capistrata's preference for marinas plates suggests potential biotic resistance. However, Sparisoma cretense showed equal biting frequencies for both plate types. The cryptogenic ascidian Trididemnum cereum was the preferred target for the fish. Our study introduces a global framework using RVFS for in-situ experiments, replicable across divers contexts (e.g., feeding behaviour, biotic resistance), which can be complemented by metabarcoding and isotopic analysis to confirm consumption patterns.