The Association Between Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Depression: A Historical Cohort Study

Treatment-resistant depression patients with baseline suicidal ideation required more treatments to achieve therapeutic response with ketamine/esketamine

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need to identify interventions to reduce suicidality. We investigated the antisuicidal effects of intravenous (IV) ketamine and intranasal (IN) esketamine among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in a historical cohort study.

METHODS

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-report (QIDS-SR) question 12 was used to measure suicidal ideation (SI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between the number of treatments to response and baseline SI (yes, Q12 > 0 versus no, Q12 = 0), adjusting for covariates and modified baseline QIDS-SR score. We evaluated associations between the number of treatments to a 50 % reduction in SI score between IV and IN treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-two adults (62.5 % female, median age 49.1 years) received IV ketamine (71 %, n = 37) or IN esketamine (29 %, n = 15). Eighty-one percent of patients reported SI at baseline. Among those with baseline SI, 60 % had improved SI scores while 38 % did not change, and among those with no SI, 80 % did not change. After adjusting for covariates, the hazard ratios (HR) of response were significantly lower among those with baseline SI (HR = 0.36, 95 % CI, 0.14-0.92, p = 0.03). The number of treatments to achieve a 50 % reduction in SI score did not depend on group (IN esketamine vs. IV ketamine HR = 0.74 [95 % CI, 0.27-2.05]; p = 0.57).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and lack of a placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients with baseline suicidal ideation require more treatments to achieve a response with ketamine or esketamine. The antisuicidal response seemed similar between IV ketamine and IN esketamine.

Association between hypothyroidism subtypes and major depression: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The causal relationship between different hypothyroidism subtypes and the risk of major depression (MD) is yet to be fully elucidated. This study aimed to determine if there's a causal relationship between various hypothyroidism subtypes (and related factors) and the risk of MD.

METHODS

This genetic association study utilized a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to explore the causal relationships between various hypothyroidism subtypes and MD risk. Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary statistics were obtained from the FinnGen and the UK Biobank. Instrumental variables (IVs) were chosen based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

RESULTS

Among the analyzed hypothyroidism subtypes and related factors, "Hypothyroidism, strict autoimmune" (HTCBSA) and "Hypothyroidism, levothyroxin purchases" (HT/LP) demonstrated a statistically significant positive causal relationship with MD, with odds ratios of 1.020 (95 % CI: 1.004-1.037) and 1.022 (95 % CI: 1.005-1.040), respectively. The sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of these findings, showing no significant horizontal pleiotropy and confirming the stability of results when individual SNPs were removed. "Congenital iodine-deficiency syndrome/hypothyroidism" (CIDS/HT), "Postinfectious hypothyroidism" (PHT), "Hypothyroidism due to medicaments and other exogenous substances" (HDTDM and OES), "Thyroid Stimulating Hormone" (TSH), "Thyrotropin-releasing hormone" (THRH), and "Hypothyroidism, strict autoimmune, 3 medication purchases required" (HTCBSA/3MPR) showed no significant causal relationship with MD.

LIMITATIONS

The study population was limited to individuals of European ancestry, and there may be certain genetic differences between different ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This MR study suggests a potential causal relationship between certain hypothyroidism subtypes (specifically HTCBSA and HT/LP) and an increased risk of MD.

The Quartile Levels of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone by Newborn Screening Stratified Risks of Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Extremely Preterm Infants - A Population Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) by newborn screening (NBS) at birth and at discharge can be surrogate markers for neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in extremely preterm infants.

METHODS

The population cohort enrolled infants born <29 weeks' gestation in 2008 - 2020 in southern Taiwan. Infants with a maternal history of thyroid disorders and infants who required thyroxine supplementation during hospitalization were excluded. TSH levels by NBS at birth and at term-equivalent age (TEA)/discharge were respectively categorized into the lowest quartile, the interquartile range, and the highest quartile, which were correlated to NDI outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 392 patients with paired TSH data, 358 (91%) were prospectively followed until corrected age 24 months. At birth, infants with lowest-quartile TSH had higher NDI risks (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 - 4.1, P = 0.004) compared to infants with interquartile-range TSH. Conversely, by TEA/discharge, infants with highest-quartile TSH had increased NDI (OR 1.9, 1.0 - 3.4, P = 0.03). By paired TSH categories, infants persistently in the lowest TSH quartile (48%, aOR 4.4, 1.4 - 14.5, P = 0.01) and those with a shift from interquartile range to the highest quartile (32%, aOR 2.7, 1.0 - 7.4, P = 0.046) had increased NDI risks compared with the reference with consistent interquartile-range TSH.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely preterm infants persistently in the lowest-quartile TSH level at birth and at discharge had the highest NDI risk. TSH quartile levels by NBS may serve as a population surrogate biomarker for assessing NDI risks in infants born extremely preterm.

Prevalence of self-reported thyroid disease among adults with depression

BACKGROUND

Thyroid disorders are a common comorbidity in patients with depression, yet there is limited information available about the clinical epidemiology of thyroid diseases in this specific population. This study aims to describe the prevalence of thyroid disease among US adults with depression from 2007 to 2018.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used nationally representative data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. Age-standardized prevalence of thyroid disease among depressed patients was calculated within 4-year survey periods (2007-2010, 2011-2014, and 2015-2018), and adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population.

RESULTS

In our weighed sample, 6.1% of depressed individuals and 4.3% of non-depressed individuals reported thyroid disease between 2007 and 2018 (P < 0.0001). The age-standardized prevalence of thyroid disease in patients with depression increased over time, from 5.4% (95%CI, 4.6%-6.2%) in 2007-2010 to 6.8% (95%CI, 5.8%-8.0%) in 2015-2018 (P for trend = 0.0270). Furthermore, thyroid disease prevalence was highest in non-Hispanic white individuals, increased with age, and tended to be higher in women. Mean depression scores in patients with thyroid disease (9.1; 95%CI, 8.7-9.5) did not significantly different from those without thyroid disease (9.1; 95%CI, 9.0-9.3) (P = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The age-standardized prevalence of thyroid disease among US adults with depression exhibited a consistent increase from 2007 to 2018, with the highest rate occurring in older, non-Hispanic white individuals, and women.