Aberrant expression of miR-9 in benign and malignant breast tumors

LncRNA PTPRG-AS1 Promotes Breast Cancer Progression by Modulating the miR-4659a-3p/QPCT Axis

Background

Overwhelming evidence has suggested that dysregulated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a critical modulating effect in the evolution of breast cancer (BRCA). Nevertheless, the roles of lncRNA PTPRG antisense RNA 1 (PTPRG-AS1) in BRCA and the underlying mechanisms have not been experimentally validated and functionally annotated.

Methods

The expression of lncRNA PTPRG-AS1 in BRCA tissues and cell lines was evaluated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and by using public databases. The proliferation of BRCA cells was detected using Cell Counting Kit-8 and colony formation assays. Wound healing assay, and Transwell migration and invasion assays were carried out to explore the migratory and invasive abilities of BRCA cells. The interaction between lncRNA PTPRG-AS1, microRNA (miR)-4659a-3p and glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase (QPCT) was verified using RT-qPCR, dual-luciferase reporter assay and Western blotting.

Results

The results showed that LncRNA PTPRG-AS1 was markedly upregulated in BRCA tissues and cell lines. Knocking down lncRNA PTPRG-AS1 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of BRCA cells, while overexpression of lncRNA PTPRG-AS1 enhanced the aforementioned properties of BRCA cells. Further analyses revealed that PTPRG-AS1 may act as a molecular sponge for miR-4659a-3p, thus regulating QPCT expression, therefore, acting as an oncogene in BRCA.

Conclusion

Collectively, the study demonstrates that lncRNA PTPRG-AS1 may act as a competing endogenous RNA by regulating the miR-4659a-3p/QPCT axis in BRCA progression. This lncRNA could potentially be a biomarker and therapeutic target for BRCA.

Evaluation of miRNAs 9 and 342 expressions in sera as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Molecular markers for the detection of breast cancer and its different types, grades, and stages lack enough sensitivity and specificity. This study evaluates the expression of miRNAs 9 and 342 in sera of different types, grades, and stages of BC. Moreover, the assessment of their sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic, and prognostic role in detecting different types of BC.

METHODS

Blood was collected from 200 females outpatients, divided into five groups each 40 subjects: control, benign breast tumor, estrogen receptor (ER+)/progesterone receptor (PR+) BC, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER+) BC, and triple-negative BC. BC subjects were further subdivided according to grade and stage. Expressions of miRNAs 9 and 342 were measured for all subjects by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

Results showed that serum expression of both miRNAs 9 and 342 can be used for the diagnosis of different types of BC. Their expression can be used to significantly differentiate between different grades and stages of BC. MiRNAs 9 and 342 showed high sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of (81.2 and 88.7%), respectively, for triple-negative BC.

CONCLUSION

The expressions of miRNAs 9 and 342 provide potential roles as serological biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of different types, grades, and stages of BC.

miR-9-5p as a Regulator of the Androgen Receptor Pathway in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Breast cancer (BC) is the most diagnosed carcinoma and the leading cause of cancer death in female over 100 countries. Thanks to the advance in therapeutic strategies, patients' survival has improved. However, the lack of response to treatments and drug resistance are still a main concern, demanding for new therapeutic approaches, in particular for the advanced stages of the disease. Androgen receptor (AR) is gaining increasing interest as a fourth targetable receptor in BC, however, its regulation in BC cells is still poorly understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. Here, we identified miR-9-5p as an inhibitor of AR expression, we validated the inverse correlation between miR-9-5p and AR in primary BC samples and we further identified a feedback loop in which androgen agonists of AR up-regulate miR-9-5p. We also provided evidence that miR-9-5p elicits anti-proliferative effects in BC cell lines regardless of their estrogen receptor status. Finally, we showed that miR-9-5p can revert AR-downstream signaling even in presence of AR-agonists, highlighting the role of this miR in the hormonal response of BC. In conclusion, this study supports the role of miR-9-5p as an anti-proliferative miR in BC and as a central modulator of AR-signaling response to circulating androgens in BC.

Intracellular functions of RNA-binding protein, Musashi1, in stem and cancer cells

RNA-binding protein, musashi1 (MSI1), is a main protein in asymmetric cell division of the sensory organ precursor cells, whereas its expression is reported to be upregulated in cancers. This protein is a critical element in proliferation of stem and cancer stem cells, which acts through Wnt and Notch signaling pathways. Moreover, MSI1 modulates malignancy and chemoresistance of lung cancer cells via activating the Akt signaling. Due to the main role of MSI1 in metastasis and cancer development, MSI1 would be an appropriate candidate for cancer therapy. Downregulation of MSI1 inhibits proliferation of cancer stem cells and reduces the growth of solid tumors in several cancers. On the other hand, MSI1 expression is regulated by microRNAs in such a way that several different tumor suppressor miRNAs negatively regulate oncogenic MSI1 and inhibit migration and tumor metastasis. The aim of this review is summarizing the role of MSI1 in stem cell proliferation and cancer promotion.

ErbB4 3'-UTR Variant (c.*3622A>G) is Associated with ER/PR Negativity and Advanced Breast Cancer

A genetic variant may alter a gene expression level and as a result be associated with pathological characteristics in breast cancer. In this research, the frequency and association of the ErbB4 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) variant, rs12471583 (c.*3622A>G) was studied in an Iranian breast cancer patients. In silico assessment was performed to predict the function of the rs12471583 variant located on the 3'-UTR of ErbB4. Furthermore, as a case-control study, this polymorphism was genotyped in 243 breast cancer patients and non-cancerous controls using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique. The Armitage's trend test and regular association tests were performed to analyze a possible association between the rs12471583 and risk of breast cancer and its relevant pathological traits. The bioinformatics analysis predicted that the rs12471583 SNP is located on the four miRNA binding sites, including miR-511-5p, miR-4659a-5p, miR-4659b-5p, and miR-6830-3p. According to logistic regression tests, the G allele is negatively associated with ER- (OR = 0.20, 95% C.I. = 0.04-0.93, p = 0.026), PR- (OR = 0.31, 95% C.I. = 0.10-0.98, p = 0.039), ER-/PR- (OR = 0.20, 95% C.I. = 0.04-0.93, p = 0.026), and advanced breast cancer (OR = 0.40, 95% C.I. = 0.18-0.85, p = 0.016). It has been found that ErbB4 expression may be linked to unfavorable outcomes in breast cancer. Likewise, our results suggest that the G allele may strengthen miRNA-ErbB4 binding efficiency and as a result reduce expression of ErbB4. This is a possible explanation for the observed association.

MicroRNA-132 suppresses migration and invasion of renal carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explain the effects of microRNA-132 in renal cell carcinoma by regulating FOXM1 expression.

METHODS

Thirty patients with renal cell carcinoma admitted to our hospital were enrolled, and their adjacent normal tissues and cancer tissues were taken. The expression of microRNA-132 was measured by in situ hybridization (ISH) and RT-PCR, and the expression of FOXM1 was evaluated by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the correlation between microRNA-132 and FOXM1 was analyzed. In the cell experiment, the KETR-3 cells were divided into three groups: Negative control (NC) group were treated with nothing; blank (BL) group were transfected with empty vector; and microRNA-132 (miRNA) group were transfected with microRNA-132. The cell invasion and migration abilities among groups were assessed by transwell and wound healing assays. The expression levels of related proteins (FOXM1, MMP-2, MMP-9, VEGF-alpha, and uPAR) were determined by Western blot.

RESULTS

Depending on clinical data, we found that FOXM1 protein expression of renal cell carcinoma tissues was higher than that in adjacent normal tissues. MiRNA-132 was negative correlation with FOXM1. In vitro, the number of invasive cells and wound healing rate in the microRNA group were significantly suppressed than those in the NC group (P < 0.05, respectively). In the Western blot assay, the results showed that the protein expression levels of FOXM1, MMP-2, MMP-9, VEGF-α, and uPAR were significantly inhibited in the miRNA group compared with the NC group (P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

miRNA-132 had anti-tumor effects in renal cell carcinoma by suppressing FOXM1 expression.

Evaluation of microRNA-9 and -192 expression levels as biomarkers in patients suffering from breast cancer

Given the global outbreak of breast cancer and its debilitating effect on women's health, it is not surprising that tremendous efforts have been made with an aim of shedding more light on the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of this type of cancer. Among the long list of risk factors associated with this malignancy, recently, the role of microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) has turned into a hotspot for breast cancer investigations. miRNAs approximately 20 nucleotides in length and are located in either an exon or an intron, playing a role in the regulation of gene expression. In the present study, we extracted RNA from both the serum and cancerous tissue of breast cancer patients and after synthesizing the cDNA, we performed quantitative PCR to determine the expression levels of miR-9 and miR-192. The resulting data revealed that while the mRNA expression level of miR-9 was significantly decreased in the breast cancer tissues, there was no noticeable change in the expression level of this miRNA in the serum samples. Likewise, we found that the marked downregulation of miR-192 was only restricted to the cancerous tissues, but was not found in the serum of patients. Based on the meaningful downregulation of the expression of miR-9 and miR-192, this study provides a plausible framework for these miRNAs as effective biomarkers for breast cancer patients.

MicroRNAs Contribute to Breast Cancer Invasiveness

Cancer statistics in 2018 highlight an 8.6 million incidence in female cancers, and 4.2 million cancer deaths globally. Moreover, breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in females and twenty percent of these develop metastasis. This provides only a small chance for successful therapy, and identification of new molecular markers for the diagnosis and prognostic prediction of metastatic disease and development of innovative therapeutic molecules are therefore urgently required. Differentially expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) in cancers cause multiple changes in the expression of the tumorigenesis-promoting genes which have mostly been investigated in breast cancers. Herein, we summarize recent data on breast cancer-specific miRNA expression profiles and their participation in regulating invasive processes, in association with changes in cytoskeletal structure, cell-cell adhesion junctions, cancer cell-extracellular matrix interactions, tumor microenvironments, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions and cancer cell stem abilities. We then focused on the epigenetic regulation of individual miRNAs and their modified interactions with other regulatory genes, and reviewed the function of miRNA isoforms and exosome-mediated miRNA transfer in cancer invasiveness. Although research into miRNA’s function in cancer is still ongoing, results herein contribute to improved metastatic cancer management.

MicroRNA-9 exerts antitumor effects on hepatocellular carcinoma progression by targeting HMGA2

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that the aberrant expression of microRNAs (miRs or miRNAs) may contribute to the initiation and progression of various types of human cancer and may also constitute biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and therapy. However, the specific function of miR‐9 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, and the mechanisms that underlie HCC are incompletely understood. Here, we report that miR‐9 expression was significantly decreased in clinical tumor tissue samples, as well as in a cohort of HCC cell lines. In addition, it was demonstrated that overexpression of miR‐9 suppressed the proliferative and migratory capacity of HCC cells and impaired cell cycle progression. Furthermore, high mobility group AT‐hook 2 (HMGA2) was verified as a downstream target gene of miR‐9 using a luciferase reporter assay. Quantitative RT‐PCR and western blotting implicated HMGA2 in the miR‐9‐mediated reduction of HCC cell growth. In vivo, transfection with miR‐9 mimics down‐regulated the expression of HMGA2, thus leading to a dramatic reduction in tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. These results suggest that miR‐9 may exert critical antitumor effects on HCC by directly targeting HMGA2, and the miR9/HMGA2 signaling pathway may be of use for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with HCC.

Evaluation of miRNA-9 and miRNA-34a as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer in Iranian women

PURPOSE

MicroRNAs are involved in diverse biological processes and their dysregulation is a common event in various diseases including breast cancer. Breast cancer is a major threat to women's health. This study was designed to examine the expression levels of miR-9 and miR-34a in breast tumor tissue samples and plasma of breast cancer patients, compare their expression pattern between tissue samples and plasma samples of patients and analyze their relationship with tumor clinical features. Also, the potential of these miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The expression levels of miR-9, miR-34a and CDH1 were measured by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and ΔΔct method. Data were analyzed using t-test and one-way ANOVA. The sensitivity and specificity of miRNAs were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The expression levels of miR-9 and miR-34a were significantly down-regulated in tumor tissues compared to healthy tissues (fold change = 0.26, p = 0.0051 for miR-9 and fold change = 0.55, p = 0.021 for miR-34a). While no significant difference was observed in the expression levels of miR-9 (p = 0.205) and miR-34a (p = 0.132) in plasma samples of patients compared to normal plasma. CDH1 expression in tumor tissue was not significantly different from normal tissue (p = 0.33). We found that expression level of miR-9 in patients with tumor size larger than 5 cm (p = 0.026) and expression level of miR-34a in patients with higher stage (lll & lV, p = 0.03) were significantly down-regulated. Also miR-34a expression level was positively correlated with patient's age (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

According to the ROC curves, the area under the curve (AUC) of miR-9 in tissue was 0.71 (p = 0.009) with sensitivity 83.33% and specificity 70.37%. The AUC for miR-34a in tissue was 0.72 (p = 0.007) with sensitivity 72% and specificity 76%. Thus miR-9 and miR-34a have the capability for distinguishing tumor tissues from healthy tissues and the study of their expression levels in tissue may be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer patients from healthy women.

Screen for MicroRNA and Drug Interactions in Breast Cancer Cell Lines Points to miR-126 as a Modulator of CDK4/6 and PIK3CA Inhibitors

Background: Breast cancer (BC) represents the most common cancer in women worldwide. Due to its heterogeneous nature, breast cancer management might benefit from differential treatments toward personalized medicine. Additionally, drug resistance is a common phenomenon. We systematically investigated the effect of 14 different drugs administered on BC cell lines in combination with microRNAs (miRNA, miR).

Methods: Thirty-eight miRNAs, all associated with BC by clinical and molecular parameters including progression, prognosis and subtypes, were tested for their effects on the viability of 12 different BC cell lines. Four miRNAs with the strongest impact on viability were further assayed in combination with 14 BC drugs. Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis.

Results: In a miRNA only pre-screen we observed effects on BC cell lines' viability for 34 out of 38 candidate miRNAs. We then identified 14 miRNA/drug combinations for which the combination IC₅₀ was lower than that of both miRNA and drug as single agents. miR-181a, paired with GSK1070916, Doxorubicin, XL765 and AMG511, was the only miRNA active on the triple negative (TNBC) MDA-MB-468 cell line. miR-126 was the only miRNA (in combination with CDK4/6 or PIK3CA inhibitors) with significant effects on cell lines from different subtypes: MCF7 (Luminal) and MDA-MB-453 (HER2⁺). Because of its activity on different BC subtypes, we investigated the genome wide effects of miR-126 using transcriptomics and confirmed that expression of miR-126 in BC cell lines affected cell cycle and mitosis.

Conclusion: Our results show that a combination treatment with miRNAs, in particular miR-181a, miR-326, miR-9 and miR-126, enhance the activity of specific BC drugs in vitro, even on the most aggressive BC subtypes, HER2+ and TNBC. Finally, as expected from its drug interactions, based on a whole transcriptome study we could confirm a role for miR-126 in cell cycle regulation.

Improved sensitivity for detection of breast cancer by combination of miR-34a and tumor markers CA 15-3 or CEA

Background

MicroRNAs biomarkers have shown value for diagnosis and prognosis of various cancers. Combination with established tumor markers has rarely been done.

Results

Breast cancer patients had significantly higher serum RNA loads (AUC 0.665), lower miR-34a (AUC 0.772), higher CEA and CA 15-3 levels (AUCs 0.717 and 0.721) than healthy controls. miR-34a correlated with tumor stage and hormone receptor status. There was no significant difference between groups for all other miRNAs. Combination of miR-34a with CEA or CA 15-3 led to improved AUCs of 0.844 and 0.800, respectively. Sensitivity of miR-34a and CA 15-3 reached 56.1% at 95% specificity. When compared with benign breast diseases, combination of miR-34a (AUC 0.719) and CEA (0.623) or CA 15-3 (0.619) resulted in improved performances (0.794 and 0.741). Sensitivity of miR-34a and CA 15-3 reached 53.7% at 95% specificity.

Conclusion

While miR-34a provides valuable information for diagnosis and staging, combination with tumor markers CA15-3 or CEA improves the sensitivity for breast cancer detection.

Patients and Methods

The diagnostic relevance of the miR-21, miR-34a, miR-92a, miR-155, miR-222 and miR-let-7c was tested in sera of 103 individuals (55 breast cancer, 20 benign breast diseases, 28 healthy controls). MiRNAs were detected by quantitative rt-PCR after extraction and reverse transcription. Cel-miR-39 and miR-16 were used for normalization. Established tumor markers CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and CA 125 were measured by automatized immunoassays. Diagnostic performance was tested by areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and sensitivities at 90% and 95% specificity.

Down-regulation of microRNA-19b in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

miR-19b (miR-19b-3p) has been reported to be correlated with either favorable or unfavorable events in several cancers. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the expression level of miR-19b in patients with breast cancer (BC). This study was aimed to investigate the expression level of miR-19b in human malignant and healthy breast tissues with histopathology of ER+/PR+/HER2-. We performed a miRNA real-time PCR to detect differential expression of miR-19b in 40 BC, including 17 BC with familial background and 23 BC without familial background, and 12 non-tumoral tissues. Moreover, a bioinformatics prediction upon miR-19b functionality in BC cells was performed. The miR-19b expression level was significantly down-regulated in BC, BC with familial background, and BC without familial background compared with its expression in normal tissue (p value, <0.0001; fold change, -7.45; p value, 0.0003; fold change, -6.45; and p value, 0.0005; fold change, -8.41, respectively). Moreover, according to the AUCs (area under curve) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, miR-19b can significantly distinguish all defined categories. Last, in agreement with our experimental findings, proteoglycans in cancer, pathways in cancer, FoxO signaling pathway, central carbon metabolism in cancer, p53 signaling pathway, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, and prolactin signaling pathway were predicted as miR-19b-related signaling pathways. In summary, down-regulation of miR-19b in BC vs healthy tissue suggests that mir-19b can function as a tumor suppressor. Our results shed additional information on controversial expression pattern of miR-19b depending on different cancer types.