Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for treatment of gynecologic carcinoma: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy

Evaluation of Dosimetric Efficacy of RapidArc and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy Techniques in Head-and-Neck Cancers

Aim

This study aims to compare the dosimetric efficacy of RapidArc (RA) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer, focusing on treatment efficiency and organ at risk (OAR) dose.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of 10 patients with head-and-neck cancer was recreated for RA, which was earlier treated with IMRT techniques. Dosimetric parameters evaluated or planning target volume (PTV) included monitor units (MUs), beam on time (BoT), gamma passing rate (GP), and various normal tissue dose indices such as V95, V90, V50, V25, and gradient indices (gradient index [GI], low GI [LGI], high GI). In addition, doses of OARs, including the spinal cord, brainstem, cochleae, esophagus, lips, larynx, and parotid glands, were compared.

Results

RA demonstrated significant improvements in treatment efficiency, requiring fewer MU and shorter BoT, while maintaining comparable GP to IMRT. RA achieved a lower LGI, indicating better sparing of normal tissues from intermediate doses. Most other dosimetric parameters, including those for the spinal cord, parotid glands, and PRV spinal cord, demonstrated significant differences, with the RA technique showing superior performance.

Conclusion

This study highlights the dosimetric superiority of RA over IMRT, with significantly fewer MU, reduced BoT, and comparable GPs. RA achieved slightly higher mean PTV doses with similar homogeneity and conformity while delivering lower doses to critical OARs, such as the spinal cord, PRV spinal cord, and parotid glands, making it clinically advantageous.

A plan comparison study between rapid arc and conventional intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Introduction

Head and neck cancers are one of the common malignancies in Indian population. It's entity, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is among the aggressive malignancies with its location and spread near very critical structures. Thus requires a highly conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques.

Purpose

The aim of the study is to dosimetrically evaluate and to compare Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans and RAPID ARC plans for irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Material and Method

A retrospective study is done on 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, who were treated with Radiotherapy at ATRCTRI Bikaner. Radiotherapy was delivered by IMRT technique (Total of 70 Gy in 33 fractions). Same patients are now planned on Rapid arc technique. Dosimetric comparison is done in terms of PTV coverage, OAR dose, conformity index, homogeneity index.

Result

PTV coverage is similar with both the plans. Homogeneity index is higher for IMRT plans 0.119+/- 0.020 compared to 0.104 +/- 0.018 for Rapid arc plans (statistically significant).The Rapid arc plans achieved slightly better conformity 1.018+/-0.09, whereas 1.105+/-0.12 for IMRT plans. Rapid arc achieved better results for OAR, statistically significant for Brainstem (54.4 +/-10.4 Gy for IMRT and 49.7+/-4.2 Gy for Rapid Arc, Lens (Left lens and Right lens received 10.55+/-5.8 Gy and 9.44+/-9.08 by IMRT and 6.12+/-6.1 Gy and 5.45+/-6.05 Gy for Rapid Arc), optic nerves (Right and Left optic nerve received 34.36 and 35.01 Gy for IMRT plans and 30.06 and 30.05 Gy for Rapid Arc plans. However the gains are statistically insignificant for spinal cord and vestibulocochlear nerve. No major difference found for Right and left parotid between both the arms.

Conclusions

Rapid Arc is better technique compared to IMRT for Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment, that provides better dose conformity, more homogeneous coverage and OAR sparing. However study is retrospective and has lesser patients, thus requires prospective study with more number of patients along with comparison of clinical outcome.

A Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost With Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy With Sequential Boost for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Dosimetric Study

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the dosimetric criteria between the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and the three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique with a sequential boost (SB) plans for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Materials and methods A retrospective dosimetric comparison was performed in 15 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who had previously been treated with fractions of 1.8 Gy up to doses of 45, 54-55.8, and 59.4 Gy in 28-33 sessions using the three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique with a sequential boost (SB) and who had a new planning that was made using the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in 25 sessions. The conformity index, quality of coverage, homogeneity index, mean doses, maximum doses, and different organ at risk (OAR) dose constraints were calculated for the dosimetric comparison of treatment plans. Descriptive analysis was performed using measures of central tendency and dispersion for the quantitative variables and absolute and relative frequencies for the qualitative variables. The comparison was made using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test for a type I error level of 0.05. The statistical software Stata 11 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA) was used in the analysis. Results The mean age of the patients was 52 years, 33% were stage IIIB, and 67% had squamous cell carcinomas. The conformity index was 0.74 and 0.46 (difference: 0.28; p<0.01), the quality of coverage was 0.84 and 0.94 (difference: -0.10; p<0.01), and the homogeneity index was 0.12 and 0.070 (difference: 0.052; p<0.01) for IMRT-SIB and 3DCRT-SB, respectively. When the mean doses of the OARs were compared, all were lower with the IMRT-SIB technique, with statistically significant differences in the rectum and bladder. Conclusions The IMRT-SIB technique achieves a greater conformation of the doses on the treatment volumes with a significant reduction of the doses on the bladder and rectum.

Gynecologic Malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies are among the most prevalent cancers affecting women worldwide, but they are heterogeneous diseases with varying risk factors, management paradigms, and outcomes. Gynecologic cancers mediated by human papillomavirus (HPV) are preventable and curable with early detection and treatment. Dramatic reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality have been achieved through cancer screening and HPV vaccination. Radiotherapy plays a central role in the management of gynecologic malignancies. For some cancers, radiotherapy alone can be curative. More often, radiotherapy is used in conjunction with surgery and systemic therapy to improve locoregional control and extend overall survival. This chapter reviews recent advances in radiotherapeutic management of gynecologic malignancies.

Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost of locally advanced cervical cancer

Introduction Some patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) cannot undergo brachytherapy (BT). Possible treatment includes two-stage external beam radiotherapy (sequential boost - SEQ) or single-stage external beam radiotherapy (simultaneous integrated boost - SIB). The goal of this paper was to carry out dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of these techniques with respect to tumour and organs-at-risk (OARs) irradiation. Methods The anatomic data of six patients with LACC were used for this study. The single-stage SIB-VMAT (25, 27 or 30 fractions) and double-stage SEQ-VMAT (25 + 6 fractions) plans were developed to deliver EQD₂=50 Gy to the pelvic region and EQD₂=90 Gy to the tumour. The developed plans were compared with respect to an EQD₂ dose delivered to a tumour and to the OARs, expected tumour control probability and normal tissue complications probability. Results The developed SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT plans had physical coverage of the CTV tumours with more than 95% of the prescribed dose delivered to more than 95% of the volume. The irradiation of the tumour for both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT has comparable EQD₂ values close to 87-88 Gy. SIB-VMAT treatment plans provided lower levels of irradiation of OARs than SEQ-VMAT plans. The optimal number of fractions for SIB-VMAT was 27. Conclusion SIB-VMAT is a better treatment option for patients with LACC that are not eligible for BT. Results show that both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT allowed good coverage of the tumour and high-quality dose delivery. SIB-VMAT allowed minimising irradiation of OARs and shortening the overall treatment time by a week.

A method for cranial target delineation in radiotherapy treatment planning aided by single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: evaluation using a custom-designed gel-based phantom and simulations

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been useful in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) especially in tumor delineation. Routinely, 2D/3D MRSI data are used for this application. However, not all centers have access to 2D/3D MRSI. The objective of this study was to introduce a method of using single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) data in target delineation and assess its reliability.

METHODS

A gel-based phantom containing Creatine (Cr), N-acetyl-l-aspartic-acid (NAA), and Choline (Cho) was designed and built. The metabolite ratios simulate the normal and tumoral part of the brain. The jMRUI software (v. 6.0) was used to simulate a 1.5 T GE MRI scanner. The metabolite spectra provided by different time of echos (TE)s of the Point-RESolved Spectroscopy pulse-sequence (PRESS), different data-points, and post-processings were quantized by jMRUI. PseudoMRSI maps of Cho/Cr, NAA/Cr, and Cho + Cr/NAA were created. A conformity index (CI) was used to determine which metabolite-ratio isolines are more appropriate for tumor delineation.

RESULTS

The simulation accuracy was verified. There were no differences > 4% between the measured and simulated spectra in peak regions. The pseudoMRSI map of Cho + Cr/NAA smoothly followed the complicated geometry of the tumor inside the gel-based phantom. The results showed that the single-voxel spectra produced by the PRESS pulse sequence with the TE of 144 ms, 512 data-points, and minimum post-processings of water suppression, eddy current correction, and baseline correction can be used for target delineation.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that SVS data can be used to aid target delineation by using a mathematical approach. This can enable a wider use of MR-derived information in radiotherapy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

To the best of our knowledge, until now, 2D or 3D MRSI data provided from 3T MRI scanners have been used for MRS-based radiotherapy treatment planning. However, there are a lot of centers that are equipped to 1.5 T MRI scanners and some of them just equipped to SVS. This study introduces a mathematical approach to help these centers to take the benefits of MRS-based treatment planning.