Comparison of the bending performance of solid and cannulated spinal pedicle screws using finite element analyses and biomechanical tests

Analysis of accuracy of pedicle screw placement in dysplastic pedicles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the pedicle expansion technique with CT-based navigation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to study the accuracy of pedicle screw (PS) insertion into dysplastic pedicles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) comparing cannulated screw using the pedicle expansion technique (PET) versus conventional technique.

METHODS

Forty-two AIS patients with 766 PSs were evaluated. In total, 236 screws were inserted into dysplastic pedicles: 138 and 98 screws were inserted using the PET (PET group) and standard technique (conventional group), respectively. Both methods used CT-based navigation to determine the insertion point. In the PET, a rigid ball tip feeler was tapped with a mallet to create an insertion route, a guide wire was passed through the tap, the pedicle was enlarged, and then a cannulated PS with a diameter of 4.35 mm was inserted. Postoperative CT was used to compare the accuracy of PS insertion.

RESULTS

In total, 23/236 (9.7%) perforations occurred. Regarding overall perforation, there were six (4.3%) and 17 (17.3%) cases in the PET and conventional group, respectively (P = 0.008). In terms of medial perforation, the PET group (n = 2, 1.4%) was significantly better than the conventional group (n = 7, 7.1%) (P = 0.021). In terms of lateral perforation, the PET group (n = 4, 2.9%) was significantly better than conventional group (n = 10, 10.2%) (P = 0.030). Only grade 1 perforation had occurred in the PET group, whereas grades 2 and 3 perforation occurred in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

Use of the PET with CT-based navigation significantly increased the accuracy and safety of PS insertion in dysplastic pedicles in AIS.

Optimization of Pedicle Screw Parameters for Enhancing Implant Stability Based on Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To improve implant stability parameters, including pedicle screw (PS) outer diameter, thread depth, and pitch, by finite element analysis.

METHODS

Insertion and pullout of the PS were simulated by finite element analysis, and the precision of simulation was evaluated by comparison with mechanical tests. Influences of the parameters on the maximum insertion torque and maximum pullout force were analyzed by computational simulations, including single-factor analysis and orthogonal experiments.

RESULTS

The simulation results agreed with the mechanical test results. The order of parameters influencing insertion torque and pullout force was outer diameter > pitch > thread depth. When the pilot hole diameter is 0.1 mm larger than the inner diameter of the PS, the calculated Pearson correlation coefficient between the maximum insertion torque and maximum pullout force was r = 0.99. The optimized PS had a maximum insertion torque of 485.16 N·mm and a maximum pullout force of 1726.33 N, 23.9% and 9.1% higher, respectively, than the values of standard screws.

CONCLUSIONS

The presently used models are feasible for evaluating the implant stability of PSs. The maximum insertion torque and maximum pullout force of PSs are highly correlated and can be improved by increasing the outer diameter and decreasing pitch. Although with the parameters of the PS, pedicle size and bone mineral density are 2 additional factors to consider for better implant stability.

Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions

Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.

Fenestrated pedicle screws for thoracolumbar instrumentation in patients with poor bone quality: Case series and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To describe the results of a single-surgeon series and systematically review the literature on cement-augmented instrumented fusion with fenestrated pedicle screws.

METHODS

All patients treated by the senior surgeon using fenestrated screws between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of 6-months of clinical and radiographic follow-up were included. For the systematic review, we used PRISMA guidelines to identify all prior descriptions of cement-augmented instrumented fusion with fenestrated pedicle screws in the English literature. Endpoints of interest included hardware loosening, cement leakage, and pulmonary cement embolism (PCE).

RESULTS

Our series included 38 patients (mean follow-up 14.8 months) who underwent cement-augmented instrumentation for tumor (47.3%), deformity/degenerative disease (39.5%), or osteoporotic fracture (13.2%). Asymptomatic screw lucency was seen in 2.6%, cement leakage in 445, and pulmonary cement embolism (PCE) in 5.2%. Our literature review identified 23 studies (n = 1526 patients), with low reported rates of hardware loosening (0.2%) and symptomatic PCE (1.0%). Cement leakage, while common (55.6%), produced symptoms in fewer than 1% of patients. Indications for cement-augmentation in this cohort included: spine metastasis with or without pathologic fracture (n = 18; 47.3%), degenerative spine disease or fixed deformity with poor underlying bone quality (n = 15; 39.5%), and osteoporotic fracture (n = 5; 13.2%).

CONCLUSION

Cement-augmented fusion with fenestrated screws appears to be a safe, effective means of treating patients with poor underlying bone quality secondary to tumor or osteoporosis. High-quality evidence with direct comparisons to non-augmented patients is needed.

Assessment of two augmentation techniques on the mechanical properties of titanium cannulated bone screws

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of 2 augmentation techniques on the mechanical properties of titanium cannulated bone screws.

SAMPLE

33 titanium cannulated bone screws (outer diameter, 6.5 mm; guide channel diameter, 3.6 mm).

PROCEDURES

11 screws were allocated to each of 3 groups. The guide channel of each screw was filled with polymethyl methacrylate bone cement alone (OCS group) or in combination with a 3.2-mm-diameter orthopedic pin (PCS group) or remained unmodified (control group) before mechanical testing. Each screw underwent a single-cycle 3-point bending test to failure with a monotonic loading rate of 2.5 mm/min. Failure was defined as an acute decrease in resistance to load of ≥ 20% or a bending deformation of 15 mm. Mechanical properties were determined for each screw and compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

All screws in the control and OCS groups and 1 screw in the PCS group broke during testing; a 15-mm bending deformation was achieved for the remaining 10 screws in the PCS group. Maximum load and load at failure differed significantly among the 3 groups. Stiffness and load at yield for the PCS group were significantly greater than those for the control and OCS groups but did not differ between the control and OCS groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Use of bone cement and an orthopedic pin to fill the guide channel of cannulated screws significantly increased the strength of the construct, but ex vivo and in vivo studies are necessary before this augmentation technique can be recommended for clinical patients.

Recent Trends, Technical Concepts and Components of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Systems: A Comprehensive Review

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems have become one of the most important and challenging types of system in clinical orthopedics, as they enable precise treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, employing modern clinical navigation systems and surgical tools. This paper brings a comprehensive review of recent trends and possibilities of CAOS systems. There are three types of the surgical planning systems, including: systems based on the volumetric images (computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound images), further systems utilize either 2D or 3D fluoroscopic images, and the last one utilizes the kinetic information about the joints and morphological information about the target bones. This complex review is focused on three fundamental aspects of CAOS systems: their essential components, types of CAOS systems, and mechanical tools used in CAOS systems. In this review, we also outline the possibilities for using ultrasound computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (UCAOS) systems as an alternative to conventionally used CAOS systems.

Comparison of the accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw versus conventional pedicle screw in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screws are commonly used to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Many studies have discussed the rates and effects of pedicle screw misplacement. In this study, to increase the accuracy rate, cannulated pedicle screws were inserted into the periapical vertebrae, highly rotated vertebrae, and vertebrae with very thin pedicles in a single patient group. We compared these results with those of a patient group who underwent conventional pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Twenty-eight AIS patients treated surgically between 2015 and 2017 with cannulated pedicle screws or conventional pedicle screws were included. Group 1 (n = 15) received cannulated pedicle screws, whereas group 2 (n = 13) received conventional pedicle screws. Postoperative computed tomography scans were used to evaluate pedicle screw position. Pedicle perforation was assessed using the classification by Rao et al: grade 0, no perforation; grade 1, only the threads outside the pedicle (less than 2 mm); grade 2, core screw diameter outside the pedicle (2-4 mm); and grade 3, screw entirely outside the pedicle. Medial screw malposition was measured between the medial pedicle wall and the medial margin of the screw. Lateral screw malposition was measured between the lateral corpus wall and lateral screw margin.

RESULTS

Placement accuracy of 703 screws (group 1, 376; group 2, 327) was evaluated. A total of 142 (20.1%) pedicle screw perforations occurred: 63 (17.1%) in group 1 and 79 (25%) in group 2 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in medial perforation (group 1, 34 [9%] vs group 2, 31 [10%]). Lateral perforation was significantly less common in group 1 (n = 29; 7.7%) than in group 2 (n = 4; 14.7%) (P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cannulated screws to treat AIS decreases perforation and complication rates. Although it did not significantly lower the medial perforation rate, it dramatically reduced the lateral perforation rate. The use of cannulated screws enables intraoperative confirmation of placement accuracy. Our data suggest that cannulated pedicle screw use to treat AIS is safer and more efficient.

Impact of Screw Type on Kyphotic Deformity Correction after Spine Fracture Fixation: Cannulated versus Solid Pedicle Screw

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Purpose

To detect the effect of cannulated (poly-axial head) and solid (mono-axial head) screws on the local kyphotic angle, vertebral body height, and superior and inferior angles between the screw and the rod in the surgical management of thoracolumbar fractures.

Overview of Literature

Biomechanics studies showed that the ultimate load, yield strength, and cycles to failure were significantly lower with cannulated (poly-axial head) pedicle comparing to solid core (mono-axial head).

Methods

The medical charts of patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent pedicle screw fixation with cannulated or solid pedicle screws were retrospectively reviewed; the subjects were followed up from January 2011 to December 2015.

Results

Total 178 patients (average age, 36.1±12.4 years; men, 142 [84.3%]; women, 28 [15.7%]) with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent surgery and were followed up at Hamad Medical Corporation were classified, based on the screw type as those with cannulated screws and those with solid screws. The most commonly affected level was L1, followed by L2 and D12. Surgical correction of the local kyphotic angle was significantly different in the groups; however, there was no significant difference in the loss of correction of the local kyphotic angle of the groups. Surgical correction of the reduction in the vertebral body height showed statistical significance, while the average loss of correction in the reduction of the vertebral body height was not significantly different. The measurement of the angles made by the screws on the rods was not significantly different between the cannulated (poly-axial head) and solid (mono-axial head) screw groups.

Conclusions

Solid screws were superior in terms of providing increased correction of the kyphotic angle and height of the fractured vertebra than the cannulated screws; however, no difference was noted between the screws in the maintenance of the superior and inferior angles of the screw with the rod.