1
|
Beghini L, Büeler S, Liechti MD, Jaffray A, David G, Vannesjo SJ. Optimized navigator-based correction of breathing-induced B 0 field fluctuations in multi-echo gradient-echo imaging of the spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 2025; 94:215-230. [PMID: 40034000 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multi-echo gradient-echo (ME-GRE) imaging in the spinal cord is susceptible to breathing-induced B0 field fluctuations due to the proximity of the lungs, leading to ghosting artifacts. A navigator readout can be used to monitor the fluctuations; however, standard navigator processing often fails in the spinal cord. Here, we introduce navigator processing tailored specifically for spinal cord imaging. METHODS ME-GRE data covering all spinal cord regions were acquired in six healthy volunteers during free breathing at 3T. Centerline navigator readouts and respiratory belt recordings were collected during the acquisitions. The navigator processing included a Fast Fourier Transform and subsequent interval selection targeting the spinal cord, as well as SNR-weighted averaging over samples and coils on the complex data. Furthermore, a phase unwrapping algorithm making use of the belt recordings was developed. Imaging data were corrected by phase demodulation before image reconstruction. RESULTS B0 field fluctuations and ghosting artifacts were largest in the lower cervical and upper lumbosacral cord (˜5 Hz std), close to the edges of the lungs. Image reconstruction based on optimized navigator correction improved visual image quality and quantitative metrics (SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), ghosting) in all regions of the spinal cord. The improvement was largest in regions with large field fluctuations (group-averaged increase in SNR/CNR of up to 29%/37% in single-echo images). CONCLUSIONS Optimized navigator-based correction can reduce ghosting artifacts and increase SNR/CNR in anatomical ME-GRE of the spinal cord. The enhanced image quality and ease of implementation across sites makes the technique attractive for clinical and scientific applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Beghini
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Silvan Büeler
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martina D Liechti
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Jaffray
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gergely David
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Johanna Vannesjo
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bédard S, Valošek J, Seif M, Curt A, Schading-Sassenhausen S, Pfender N, Freund P, Hupp M, Cohen-Adad J. Normalizing spinal cord compression measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine J 2025:S1529-9430(25)00159-7. [PMID: 40154634 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/22/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Accurate and automatic MRI measurements are relevant for assessing spinal cord compression severity in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and guiding treatment. The widely-used maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC) index has limitations. Firstly, it normalizes the anteroposterior cord diameter by that above and below the compression but does not account for cord size variation along the superior-inferior axis, making MSCC sensitive to compression level. Secondly, cord shape varies across individuals, making MSCC sensitive to this variability. Thirdly, MSCC is typically calculated by an expert-rater from a single sagittal slice, which is time-consuming and prone to variability. PURPOSE This study proposes a fully automatic pipeline to compute MSCC. DESIGN We developed a normalization strategy for traditional MSCC (anteroposterior diameter) using a healthy adults database (n = 203) to address cord anatomy variability across individuals and evaluated additional morphometrics (transverse diameter, area, eccentricity, and solidity). PATIENT SAMPLE DCM patient cohort of n = 120. OUTCOME MEASURES Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used as evaluation metrics. METHODS We validated the method in a mild DCM patient cohort against manually derived morphometrics and predicted the therapeutic decision (operative/conservative) using a stepwise binary logistic regression incorporating demographics and clinical scores. RESULTS The automatic and normalized MSCC measures correlated significantly with clinical scores and predicted the therapeutic decision more accurately than manual MSCC. Significant predictors included upper extremity sensory dysfunction, T2w hyperintensity, and the proposed MRI-based measures. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.80 in receiver operating characteristic analysis. CONCLUSION This study introduced an automatic method for computing normalized measures of cord compressions from MRIs, potentially improving therapeutic decisions in DCM patients. The method is open-source and available in Spinal Cord Toolbox v6.0 and above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine Bédard
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2500 Chem. de Polytechnique, Montréal, H3T 1J4, Québec, Canada
| | - Jan Valošek
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2500 Chem. de Polytechnique, Montréal, H3T 1J4, Québec, Canada; Mila - Quebec AI Institute, 6666 Rue Saint-Urbain, Montréal, H2S 3H1, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 775 15, Hněvotínská 976/3, Nová Ulice, 779 00 Olomouc, Czechia; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 775 15, Hněvotínská 976/3, Nová Ulice, 779 00 Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Maryam Seif
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Armin Curt
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Schading-Sassenhausen
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nikolai Pfender
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Freund
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstraße 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom
| | - Markus Hupp
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2500 Chem. de Polytechnique, Montréal, H3T 1J4, Québec, Canada; Mila - Quebec AI Institute, 6666 Rue Saint-Urbain, Montréal, H2S 3H1, Québec, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, 4545, Queen Mary Road, Montreal, H3W 1W4, Quebec, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, 4545 Chem. Queen Mary, Montréal, H3W 1W4, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiu Z, Liu T, Zeng C, Yang M, Yang H, Xu X. Exploratory study on the ascending pain pathway in patients with chronic neck and shoulder pain based on combined brain and spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging. Front Neurosci 2025; 19:1460881. [PMID: 40012685 PMCID: PMC11861079 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1460881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the changes in the white matter microstructure of the ascending pain conduction pathways in patients with chronic neck and shoulder pain (CNSP) using combined brain and spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging techniques, and to assess its correlation with clinical indicators and cognitive functions. Materials and methods A 3.0T MRI scanner was used to perform combined brain and spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging scans on 31 CNSP patients and 24 healthy controls (HCs), extracting the spinothalamic tract (STT) and quantitatively analyzing the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) which reflect the microstructural integrity of nerve fibers. Additionally, these differences were subjected to partial correlation analysis in relation to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, duration of pain, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Results Compared to HCs, CNSP patients showed decreased mean FA values and increased mean MD values in bilateral intracranial STT compared to the HC group, but two-sample t-test results indicated no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). FA values of the left STT (C2 segment, C5 segment) and right STT (C1 segment, C2 segment) were significantly decreased in bilateral cervical STTs of CNSP patients; MD values of the left STT (C1 segment, C2 segment, C5 segment) and right STT (C1 segment, C5 segment) were significantly increased (p < 0.05). Partial correlation analysis results showed that FA values of STT in CNSP patients were negatively correlated with VAS scores, duration of pain, SAS scores, and SDS scores, while MD values were positively correlated with VAS scores and duration of pain (Bonferroni p < 0.05). Conclusion This research identified that patients with CNSP exhibited reduced mean FA and increased mean MD in the bilateral intracranial STT, although these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conversely, significant abnormalities were observed in specific segments of the bilateral cervical STT (p < 0.05), which were also correlated with variations in pain intensity, illness duration, and levels of anxiety and depression. These findings contribute a novel neuroimaging perspective to the evaluation and elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic pain in the ascending conduction pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Qiu
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Tianci Liu
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Chengxi Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Maojiang Yang
- Department of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - HongYing Yang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Xiaoxue Xu
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Masse‐Gignac N, Flórez‐Jiménez S, Mac‐Thiong J, Duong L. Attention-gated U-Net networks for simultaneous axial/sagittal planes segmentation of injured spinal cords. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14123. [PMID: 37735825 PMCID: PMC10562020 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging is currently the gold standard for the evaluation of spinal cord injuries. Automatic analysis of these injuries is however challenging, as MRI resolutions vary for different planes of analysis and physiological features are often distorted around these injuries. This study proposes a new CNN-based segmentation method in which information is exchanged between two networks analyzing the scans from different planes. Our aim was to develop a robust method for automatic segmentation of the spinal cord in patients having suffered traumatic injuries. The database consisted of 106 sagittal MRI scans from 94 patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries. Our method used an innovative approach where the scans were analyzed in series under the axial and sagittal plane by two different convolutional networks. The results were compared with those of Deepseg 2D from the Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT), which was taken as state-of-the-art. Comparisons were evaluated using K-Fold cross-validation combined with statistical t-test results on separate test data. Our method achieved significantly better results than Deepseg 2D, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.95 against 0.88 for Deepseg 2D (p <0.001). Other metrics were also used to compare the segmentations, all of which showed significantly better results for our approach. In this study, we introduce a robust method for spinal cord segmentation which is capable of adequately segmenting spinal cords affected by traumatic injuries, improving upon the methods contained in SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Masse‐Gignac
- Department of software and IT engineeringÉcole de technologie supérieureMontréalCanada
- Department of orthopedic surgeryHopital Sacré‐CoeurMontréalCanada
| | - Salomón Flórez‐Jiménez
- Department of software and IT engineeringÉcole de technologie supérieureMontréalCanada
- Department of orthopedic surgeryHopital Sacré‐CoeurMontréalCanada
| | - Jean‐Marc Mac‐Thiong
- Department of software and IT engineeringÉcole de technologie supérieureMontréalCanada
- Department of orthopedic surgeryHopital Sacré‐CoeurMontréalCanada
| | - Luc Duong
- Department of software and IT engineeringÉcole de technologie supérieureMontréalCanada
- Department of orthopedic surgeryHopital Sacré‐CoeurMontréalCanada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang ZY, Guo ZH. Intelligent Chinese Medicine: A New Direction Approach for Integrative Medicine in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Chin J Integr Med 2023:10.1007/s11655-023-3639-7. [PMID: 37222830 DOI: 10.1007/s11655-023-3639-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
High mortality rates from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) persist worldwide. Older people are at a higher risk of developing these diseases. Given the current high treatment cost for CVDs, there is a need to prevent CVDs and or develop treatment alternatives. Western and Chinese medicines have been used to treat CVDs. However, several factors, such as inaccurate diagnoses, non-standard prescriptions, and poor adherence behavior, lower the benefits of the treatments by Chinese medicine (CM). Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in clinical diagnosis and treatment, especially in assessing efficacy of CM in clinical decision support systems, health management, new drug research and development, and drug efficacy evaluation. In this study, we explored the role of AI in CM in the diagnosis and treatment of CVDs, and discussed application of AI in assessing the effect of CM on CVDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Yan Wang
- The First Clinical College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China
| | - Zhi-Hua Guo
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Colleges and Universities of Intelligent Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Preventive Treatment of Chronic Diseases of Hunan Universities of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fanni SC, Greco G, Rossi S, Aghakhanyan G, Masala S, Scaglione M, Tonerini M, Neri E. Role of artificial intelligence in oncologic emergencies: a narrative review. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2023; 4:344-354. [PMID: 37205309 PMCID: PMC10185441 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncologic emergencies are a wide spectrum of oncologic conditions caused directly by malignancies or their treatment. Oncologic emergencies may be classified according to the underlying physiopathology in metabolic, hematologic, and structural conditions. In the latter, radiologists have a pivotal role, through an accurate diagnosis useful to provide optimal patient care. Structural conditions may involve the central nervous system, thorax, or abdomen, and emergency radiologists have to know the characteristics imaging findings of each one of them. The number of oncologic emergencies is growing due to the increased incidence of malignancies in the general population and also to the improved survival of these patients thanks to the advances in cancer treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could be a solution to assist emergency radiologists with this rapidly increasing workload. To our knowledge, AI applications in the setting of the oncologic emergency are mostly underexplored, probably due to the relatively low number of oncologic emergencies and the difficulty in training algorithms. However, cancer emergencies are defined by the cause and not by a specific pattern of radiological symptoms and signs. Therefore, it can be expected that AI algorithms developed for the detection of these emergencies in the non-oncological field can be transferred to the clinical setting of oncologic emergency. In this review, a craniocaudal approach was followed and central nervous system, thoracic, and abdominal oncologic emergencies have been addressed regarding the AI applications reported in literature. Among the central nervous system emergencies, AI applications have been reported for brain herniation and spinal cord compression. In the thoracic district the addressed emergencies were pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade and pneumothorax. Pneumothorax was the most frequently described application for AI, to improve sensibility and to reduce the time-to-diagnosis. Finally, regarding abdominal emergencies, AI applications for abdominal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, and intestinal intussusception have been described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Claudio Fanni
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Greco
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Rossi
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gayane Aghakhanyan
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Masala
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Michele Tonerini
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khamaysa M, Lefort M, Pélégrini-Issac M, Lackmy-Vallée A, Preuilh A, Devos D, Rolland AS, Desnuelle C, Chupin M, Marchand-Pauvert V, Querin G, Pradat PF. Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and classical clinical factors in predicting motor capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 2023:10.1007/s00415-023-11727-w. [PMID: 37103756 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11727-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motor capacity is crucial in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trial design and patient care. However, few studies have explored the potential of multimodal MRI to predict motor capacity in ALS. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of cervical spinal cord MRI parameters for motor capacity in ALS compared to clinical prognostic factors. METHODS Spinal multimodal MRI was performed shortly after diagnosis in 41 ALS patients and 12 healthy participants as part of a prospective multicenter cohort study, the PULSE study (NCT00002013-A00969-36). Motor capacity was assessed using ALSFRS-R scores. Multiple stepwise linear regression models were constructed to predict motor capacity at 3 and 6 months from diagnosis, based on clinical variables, structural MRI measurements, including spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA), anterior-posterior, and left-to-right cross-section diameters at vertebral levels from C1 to T4, and diffusion parameters in the lateral corticospinal tracts (LCSTs) and dorsal columns. RESULTS Structural MRI measurements were significantly correlated with the ALSFRS-R score and its sub-scores. And as early as 3 months from diagnosis, structural MRI measurements fit the best multiple linear regression model to predict the total ALSFRS-R (R2 = 0.70, p value = 0.0001) and arm sub-score (R2 = 0.69, p value = 0.0002), and combined with DTI metric in the LCST and clinical factors fit the best multiple linear regression model to predict leg sub-score (R2 = 0.73, p value = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS Spinal multimodal MRI could be promising as a tool to enhance prognostic accuracy and serve as a motor function proxy in ALS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Khamaysa
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - M Lefort
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - M Pélégrini-Issac
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - A Lackmy-Vallée
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - A Preuilh
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - D Devos
- Département de Neurology, Centre Référent SLA, CHU de Lille, Centre LICEND COEN, Lille, France
- Départment de Pharmacologie Médicale, Université de Lille, INSERM UMRS_1172 LilNCog, CHU de Lille, Centre LICEND COEN, Lille, France
| | - A-S Rolland
- Départment de Pharmacologie Médicale, Université de Lille, INSERM UMRS_1172 LilNCog, CHU de Lille, Centre LICEND COEN, Lille, France
| | - C Desnuelle
- Faculté Médecine de Nice, Département de Neurologie, Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - M Chupin
- CATI Multicenter Neuroimaging Platform, Paris, France
| | - V Marchand-Pauvert
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France
| | - G Querin
- APHP, Service de Neuromyologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre Référent Maladies Neuromusculaires Rares, Paris, France
- Institut de Myologie, I-Motion Clinical Trials Platform, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-François Pradat
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Paris, France.
- APHP, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre Référent SLA, Paris, France.
- Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Ulster University, C-TRIC, Altnagelvin Hospital, Derry/Londonderry, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bédard S, Cohen-Adad J. Automatic measure and normalization of spinal cord cross-sectional area using the pontomedullary junction. FRONTIERS IN NEUROIMAGING 2022; 1:1031253. [PMID: 37555172 PMCID: PMC10406309 DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.1031253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is a relevant biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases. However, the considerable inter-subject variability among healthy participants currently limits its usage. Previous studies explored factors contributing to the variability, yet the normalization models required manual intervention and used vertebral levels as a reference, which is an imprecise prediction of the spinal levels. In this study we implemented a method to measure CSA automatically from a spatial reference based on the central nervous system (the pontomedullary junction, PMJ), we investigated factors to explain variability, and developed normalization strategies on a large cohort (N = 804). Following automatic spinal cord segmentation, vertebral labeling and PMJ labeling, the spinal cord CSA was computed on T1w MRI scans from the UK Biobank database. The CSA was computed using two methods. For the first method, the CSA was computed at the level of the C2-C3 intervertebral disc. For the second method, the CSA was computed at 64 mm caudally from the PMJ, this distance corresponding to the average distance between the PMJ and the C2-C3 disc across all participants. The effect of various demographic and anatomical factors was explored, and a stepwise regression found significant predictors; the coefficients of the best fit model were used to normalize CSA. CSA measured at C2-C3 disc and using the PMJ differed significantly (paired t-test, p-value = 0.0002). The best normalization model included thalamus, brain volume, sex and the interaction between brain volume and sex. The coefficient of variation went down for PMJ CSA from 10.09 (without normalization) to 8.59%, a reduction of 14.85%. For CSA at C2-C3, it went down from 9.96 to 8.42%, a reduction of 15.13 %. This study introduces an end-to-end automatic pipeline to measure and normalize cord CSA from a neurological reference. This approach requires further validation to assess atrophy in longitudinal studies. The inter-subject variability of CSA can be partly accounted for by demographics and anatomical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine Bédard
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bueno A, Bosch I, Rodríguez A, Jiménez A, Carreres J, Fernández M, Marti-Bonmati L, Alberich-Bayarri A. Automated Cervical Spinal Cord Segmentation in Real-World MRI of Multiple Sclerosis Patients by Optimized Hybrid Residual Attention-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks. J Digit Imaging 2022; 35:1131-1142. [PMID: 35789447 PMCID: PMC9582086 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most sensitive clinical tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS) alterations. Spinal cord evaluation has gained interest in this clinical scenario in recent years, but, unlike the brain, there is a more limited choice of algorithms to assist spinal cord segmentation. Our goal was to investigate and develop an automatic MR cervical cord segmentation method, enabling automated and seamless spinal cord atrophy assessment and setting the stage for the development of an aggregated algorithm for the extraction of lesion-related imaging biomarkers. The algorithm was developed using a real-world MR imaging dataset of 121 MS patients (96 cases used as a training dataset and 25 cases as a validation dataset). Transversal, 3D T1-weighted gradient echo MR images (TE/TR/FA = 1.7-2.7 ms/5.6-8.2 ms/12°) were acquired in a 3 T system (Signa HD, GEHC) as standard of care in our clinical practice. Experienced radiologists supervised the manual labelling, which was considered the ground-truth. The 2D convolutional neural network consisted of a hybrid residual attention-aware segmentation method trained to delineate the cervical spinal cord. The training was conducted using a focal loss function, based on the Tversky index to address label imbalance, and an automatic optimal learning rate finder. Our automated model provided an accurate segmentation, achieving a validation DICE coefficient of 0.904 ± 0.101 compared with the manual delineation. An automatic method for cervical spinal cord segmentation on T1-weighted MR images was successfully implemented. It will have direct implications serving as the first step for accelerating the process for MS staging and follow-up through imaging biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- América Bueno
- Instituto de Tecnologías y Aplicaciones Multimedia, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ignacio Bosch
- Instituto de Tecnologías y Aplicaciones Multimedia, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Jiménez
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Valencia, Spain
| | - Joan Carreres
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Matías Fernández
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
| | - Angel Alberich-Bayarri
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cui Y, Zhu J, Duan Z, Liao Z, Wang S, Liu W. Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11708. [PMID: 36141981 PMCID: PMC9517575 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Spinal maladies are among the most common causes of pain and disability worldwide. Imaging represents an important diagnostic procedure in spinal care. Imaging investigations can provide information and insights that are not visible through ordinary visual inspection. Multiscale in vivo interrogation has the potential to improve the assessment and monitoring of pathologies thanks to the convergence of imaging, artificial intelligence (AI), and radiomic techniques. AI is revolutionizing computer vision, autonomous driving, natural language processing, and speech recognition. These revolutionary technologies are already impacting radiology, diagnostics, and other fields, where automated solutions can increase precision and reproducibility. In the first section of this narrative review, we provide a brief explanation of the many approaches currently being developed, with a particular emphasis on those employed in spinal imaging studies. The previously documented uses of AI for challenges involving spinal imaging, including imaging appropriateness and protocoling, image acquisition and reconstruction, image presentation, image interpretation, and quantitative image analysis, are then detailed. Finally, the future applications of AI to imaging of the spine are discussed. AI has the potential to significantly affect every step in spinal imaging. AI can make images of the spine more useful to patients and doctors by improving image quality, imaging efficiency, and diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Cui
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Jia Zhu
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Zhili Duan
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Zhenhua Liao
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Song Wang
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| | - Weiqiang Liu
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Biomechanics and Biotechnology Lab, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat Med 2022; 28:260-271. [PMID: 35132264 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01663-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) targeting the dorsal roots of lumbosacral segments restores walking in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, EES is delivered with multielectrode paddle leads that were originally designed to target the dorsal column of the spinal cord. Here, we hypothesized that an arrangement of electrodes targeting the ensemble of dorsal roots involved in leg and trunk movements would result in superior efficacy, restoring more diverse motor activities after the most severe SCI. To test this hypothesis, we established a computational framework that informed the optimal arrangement of electrodes on a new paddle lead and guided its neurosurgical positioning. We also developed software supporting the rapid configuration of activity-specific stimulation programs that reproduced the natural activation of motor neurons underlying each activity. We tested these neurotechnologies in three individuals with complete sensorimotor paralysis as part of an ongoing clinical trial ( www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02936453). Within a single day, activity-specific stimulation programs enabled these three individuals to stand, walk, cycle, swim and control trunk movements. Neurorehabilitation mediated sufficient improvement to restore these activities in community settings, opening a realistic path to support everyday mobility with EES in people with SCI.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cohen-Adad J, Alonso-Ortiz E, Abramovic M, Arneitz C, Atcheson N, Barlow L, Barry RL, Barth M, Battiston M, Büchel C, Budde M, Callot V, Combes AJE, De Leener B, Descoteaux M, de Sousa PL, Dostál M, Doyon J, Dvorak A, Eippert F, Epperson KR, Epperson KS, Freund P, Finsterbusch J, Foias A, Fratini M, Fukunaga I, Wheeler-Kingshott CAMG, Germani G, Gilbert G, Giove F, Gros C, Grussu F, Hagiwara A, Henry PG, Horák T, Hori M, Joers J, Kamiya K, Karbasforoushan H, Keřkovský M, Khatibi A, Kim JW, Kinany N, Kitzler H, Kolind S, Kong Y, Kudlička P, Kuntke P, Kurniawan ND, Kusmia S, Labounek R, Laganà MM, Laule C, Law CS, Lenglet C, Leutritz T, Liu Y, Llufriu S, Mackey S, Martinez-Heras E, Mattera L, Nestrasil I, O'Grady KP, Papinutto N, Papp D, Pareto D, Parrish TB, Pichiecchio A, Prados F, Rovira À, Ruitenberg MJ, Samson RS, Savini G, Seif M, Seifert AC, Smith AK, Smith SA, Smith ZA, Solana E, Suzuki Y, Tackley G, Tinnermann A, Valošek J, Van De Ville D, Yiannakas MC, Weber KA, Weiskopf N, Wise RG, Wyss PO, Xu J. Generic acquisition protocol for quantitative MRI of the spinal cord. Nat Protoc 2021; 16:4611-4632. [PMID: 34400839 PMCID: PMC8811488 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative spinal cord (SC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presents many challenges, including a lack of standardized imaging protocols. Here we present a prospectively harmonized quantitative MRI protocol, which we refer to as the spine generic protocol, for users of 3T MRI systems from the three main manufacturers: GE, Philips and Siemens. The protocol provides guidance for assessing SC macrostructural and microstructural integrity: T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging for SC cross-sectional area computation, multi-echo gradient echo for gray matter cross-sectional area, and magnetization transfer and diffusion weighted imaging for assessing white matter microstructure. In a companion paper from the same authors, the spine generic protocol was used to acquire data across 42 centers in 260 healthy subjects. The key details of the spine generic protocol are also available in an open-access document that can be found at https://github.com/spine-generic/protocols . The protocol will serve as a starting point for researchers and clinicians implementing new SC imaging initiatives so that, in the future, inclusion of the SC in neuroimaging protocols will be more common. The protocol could be implemented by any trained MR technician or by a researcher/clinician familiar with MRI acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Mila-Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Eva Alonso-Ortiz
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mihael Abramovic
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Carina Arneitz
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Atcheson
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laura Barlow
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert L Barry
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Markus Barth
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marco Battiston
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian Büchel
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthew Budde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Virginie Callot
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France
- APHM, Hopital Universitaire Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
| | - Anna J E Combes
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maxime Descoteaux
- Centre de Recherche CHUS, CIMS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab (SCIL), Computer Science department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Marek Dostál
- UHB - University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Julien Doyon
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Adam Dvorak
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Falk Eippert
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karla R Epperson
- Richard M. Lucas Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kevin S Epperson
- Richard M. Lucas Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Freund
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Finsterbusch
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandru Foias
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michela Fratini
- Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Issei Fukunaga
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Germani
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Federico Giove
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- CREF - Museo storico della fisica e Centro studi e ricerche Enrico Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | - Charley Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Francesco Grussu
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Radiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pierre-Gilles Henry
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tomáš Horák
- Multimodal and functional imaging laboratory, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Masaaki Hori
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James Joers
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haleh Karbasforoushan
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Miloš Keřkovský
- UHB - University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ali Khatibi
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joo-Won Kim
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nawal Kinany
- Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hagen Kitzler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Shannon Kolind
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yazhuo Kong
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petr Kudlička
- Multimodal and functional imaging laboratory, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Paul Kuntke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nyoman D Kurniawan
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Slawomir Kusmia
- CUBRIC, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, University College London, London, UK
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK
| | - René Labounek
- Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | - Cornelia Laule
- Departments of Radiology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Physics & Astronomy; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christine S Law
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Christophe Lenglet
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tobias Leutritz
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Yaou Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Tiantan Image Research Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Sara Llufriu
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eloy Martinez-Heras
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Loan Mattera
- Fondation Campus Biotech Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Igor Nestrasil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristin P O'Grady
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nico Papinutto
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Papp
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Neuroradiology Section, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Todd B Parrish
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anna Pichiecchio
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ferran Prados
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, University College London, London, UK
- E-health Centre, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Neuroradiology Section, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc J Ruitenberg
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca S Samson
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Giovanni Savini
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maryam Seif
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alan C Seifert
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex K Smith
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Seth A Smith
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Zachary A Smith
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Elisabeth Solana
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuichi Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Alexandra Tinnermann
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Valošek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Dimitri Van De Ville
- Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marios C Yiannakas
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth A Weber
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Richard G Wise
- CUBRIC, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio University" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Patrik O Wyss
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Junqian Xu
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valsasina P, Horsfield MA, Meani A, Gobbi C, Gallo A, Rocca MA, Filippi M. Improved Assessment of Longitudinal Spinal Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Registration-Based Approach: Relevance for Clinical Studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 55:1559-1568. [PMID: 34582062 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reliable measurements of cervical cord atrophy progression may be useful for monitoring neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). PURPOSE To compare a new, registration-based (Reg) method with two existing methods (active surface [AS] and propagation segmentation [PropSeg]) to measure cord atrophy changes over time in MS. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS Cohort I: Eight healthy controls (HC) and 28 MS patients enrolled at a single institution, and cohort II: 25 HC and 63 MS patients enrolled at three European sites. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, acquired at 1.5 T (cohort I) and 3.0 T (cohort II). ASSESSMENT Percentage cord area changes (PCACs) between baseline and follow-up (cohort I: 2.34 years [interquartile range = 2.00-2.55 years], cohort II: 1.05 years [interquartile range = 1.01-1.18 years]) were evaluated for all subjects using Reg, AS, and PropSeg. Reg included an accurate registration of baseline and follow-up straightened cord images, followed by AS-based optimized cord segmentation. A subset of studies was analyzed twice by two observers. STATISTICAL TESTS Linear regression models were used to estimate annualized PCAC, and effect sizes expressed as the ratio between the estimated differences and HC error term (P < 0.05). Reproducibility was assessed by linear mixed-effect models. Annualized PCACs were used for sample size calculations (significance: α = 0.05, power: 1 - β = 0.80). RESULTS Annualized PCACs and related standard errors (SEs) were lower with Reg than with other methods: PCAC in MS patients at 1.5 T was -1.12% (SE = 0.22) with Reg, -1.32% (SE = 0.30) with AS, and -1.40% (SE = 0.33) with PropSeg, while at 3.0 T PCAC was -0.83% (SE = 0.25) with Reg, -0.92% (SE = 0.32) with AS, and -1.18 (SE = 0.53) with PropSeg. This was reflected in larger effect sizes and lower sample sizes. Intra- and inter-observer agreement range was 0.72-0.91 with AS, and it was >0.96 with Reg. DATA CONCLUSION The results support the use of the registration method to measure cervical cord atrophy progression in future MS clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Valsasina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Meani
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Gobbi
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland (NSI), Lugano, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Gallo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences and 3T-MRI Research Centre, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stephens ME, O'Neal CM, Westrup AM, Muhammad FY, McKenzie DM, Fagg AH, Smith ZA. Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:965-978. [PMID: 34490539 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01624-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Machine learning is a rapidly evolving field that offers physicians an innovative and comprehensive mechanism to examine various aspects of patient data. Cervical and lumbar degenerative spine disorders are commonly age-related disease processes that can utilize machine learning to improve patient outcomes with careful patient selection and intervention. The aim of this study is to examine the current applications of machine learning in cervical and lumbar degenerative spine disease. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane was conducted through May 31st, 2020, using the following terms: "artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" AND "neurosurgery" AND "spine." Studies were included if original research on machine learning was utilized in patient care for degenerative spine disease, including radiographic machine learning applications. Studies focusing on robotic applications in neurosurgery, navigation, or stereotactic radiosurgery were excluded. The literature search identified 296 papers, with 35 articles meeting inclusion criteria. There were nine studies involving cervical degenerative spine disease and 26 studies on lumbar degenerative spine disease. The majority of studies for both cervical and lumbar spines utilized machine learning for the prediction of postoperative outcomes, with 5 (55.6%) and 15 (61.5%) studies, respectively. Machine learning applications focusing on degenerative lumbar spine greatly outnumber the current volume of cervical spine studies. The current research in lumbar spine also demonstrates more advanced clinical applications of radiographic, diagnostic, and predictive machine learning models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Stephens
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Christen M O'Neal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Alison M Westrup
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Fauziyya Y Muhammad
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Daniel M McKenzie
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Andrew H Fagg
- School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Zachary A Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Suite 4000, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lemay A, Gros C, Zhuo Z, Zhang J, Duan Y, Cohen-Adad J, Liu Y. Automatic multiclass intramedullary spinal cord tumor segmentation on MRI with deep learning. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 31:102766. [PMID: 34352654 PMCID: PMC8350366 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Automatic spinal cord tumor segmentation with deep learning. Multi-class model for tumor, edema, and cavity. Model trained to recognize astrocytoma, ependymoma, and hemangioblastoma. Multi-contrast input for more robustness: Gd-T1w and T2w. Method and model are available in open-source Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT).
Spinal cord tumors lead to neurological morbidity and mortality. Being able to obtain morphometric quantification (size, location, growth rate) of the tumor, edema, and cavity can result in improved monitoring and treatment planning. Such quantification requires the segmentation of these structures into three separate classes. However, manual segmentation of three-dimensional structures is time consuming, tedious and prone to intra- and inter-rater variability, motivating the development of automated methods. Here, we tailor a model adapted to the spinal cord tumor segmentation task. Data were obtained from 343 patients using gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI scans with cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar coverage. The dataset includes the three most common intramedullary spinal cord tumor types: astrocytomas, ependymomas, and hemangioblastomas. The proposed approach is a cascaded architecture with U-Net-based models that segments tumors in a two-stage process: locate and label. The model first finds the spinal cord and generates bounding box coordinates. The images are cropped according to this output, leading to a reduced field of view, which mitigates class imbalance. The tumor is then segmented. The segmentation of the tumor, cavity, and edema (as a single class) reached 76.7 ± 1.5% of Dice score and the segmentation of tumors alone reached 61.8 ± 4.0% Dice score. The true positive detection rate was above 87% for tumor, edema, and cavity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully automatic deep learning model for spinal cord tumor segmentation. The multiclass segmentation pipeline is available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox (https://spinalcordtoolbox.com/). It can be run with custom data on a regular computer within seconds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreanne Lemay
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Mila, Quebec AI Institute, Canada
| | - Charley Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Mila, Quebec AI Institute, Canada
| | - Zhizheng Zhuo
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yunyun Duan
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Mila, Quebec AI Institute, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Yaou Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ouellette R, Treaba CA, Granberg T, Herranz E, Barletta V, Mehndiratta A, De Leener B, Tauhid S, Yousuf F, Dupont SM, Klawiter EC, Sloane JA, Bakshi R, Cohen-Adad J, Mainero C. 7 T imaging reveals a gradient in spinal cord lesion distribution in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2021; 143:2973-2987. [PMID: 32935834 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We used 7 T MRI to: (i) characterize the grey and white matter pathology in the cervical spinal cord of patients with early relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; (ii) assess the spinal cord lesion spatial distribution and the hypothesis of an outside-in pathological process possibly driven by CSF-mediated immune cytotoxic factors; and (iii) evaluate the association of spinal cord pathology with brain burden and its contribution to neurological disability. We prospectively recruited 20 relapsing-remitting, 15 secondary progressive multiple sclerosis participants and 11 age-matched healthy control subjects to undergo 7 T imaging of the cervical spinal cord and brain as well as conventional 3 T brain acquisition. Cervical spinal cord imaging at 7 T was used to segment grey and white matter, including lesions therein. Brain imaging at 7 T was used to segment cortical and white matter lesions and 3 T imaging for cortical thickness estimation. Cervical spinal cord lesions were mapped voxel-wise as a function of distance from the inner central canal CSF pool to the outer subpial surface. Similarly, brain white matter lesions were mapped voxel-wise as a function of distance from the ventricular system. Subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis showed a greater predominance of spinal cord lesions nearer the outer subpial surface compared to secondary progressive cases. Inversely, secondary progressive participants presented with more centrally located lesions. Within the brain, there was a strong gradient of lesion formation nearest the ventricular system that was most evident in participants with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Lesion fractions within the spinal cord grey and white matter were related to the lesion fraction in cerebral white matter. Cortical thinning was the primary determinant of the Expanded Disability Status Scale, white matter lesion fractions in the spinal cord and brain of the 9-Hole Peg Test and cortical thickness and spinal cord grey matter cross-sectional area of the Timed 25-Foot Walk. Spinal cord lesions were localized nearest the subpial surfaces for those with relapsing-remitting and the central canal CSF surface in progressive disease, possibly implying CSF-mediated pathogenic mechanisms in lesion development that may differ between multiple sclerosis subtypes. These findings show that spinal cord lesions involve both grey and white matter from the early multiple sclerosis stages and occur mostly independent from brain pathology. Despite the prevalence of cervical spinal cord lesions and atrophy, brain pathology seems more strongly related to physical disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Ouellette
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Constantina A Treaba
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Herranz
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valeria Barletta
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ambica Mehndiratta
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahamat Tauhid
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fawad Yousuf
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah M Dupont
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric C Klawiter
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob A Sloane
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rohit Bakshi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Caterina Mainero
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dauleac C, Bannier E, Cotton F, Frindel C. Effect of distortion corrections on the tractography quality in spinal cord diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2021; 85:3241-3255. [PMID: 33475180 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of a different distortion correction (DC) method and patient geometry (sagittal balance) on the quality of spinal cord tractography rendering according to different tractography approaches. METHODS Forty-four adults free of spinal cord diseases underwent cervical diffusion-weighted imaging. The phase-encoding direction was head→foot. Sequence with opposed polarities (foot→head) was acquired to perform DC. Eddy-current, motion effects, and susceptibility artifact correction methods were used for DC, and two deterministic and one probabilistic tractography approaches were evaluated using MRtrix and DSI Studio tractography software. Fiber length and number of fibers were extracted to evaluate the quality of the tractography rendering. For each subject, cervical lordosis was measured to assess patient geometry. The angle between the main direction of the spinal cord and the orientation of the acquisition box were computed at each spine level to assess acquisition geometry and define an angle threshold for which a tractography of good quality is no longer possible. RESULTS There was a significant improvement in tractography quality after performing DC with susceptibility artifact correction using a deterministic approach based on tensor. Before DC, the angle threshold was defined at C6 (15.2°) compared with C7 (21.9°) after corrections, demonstrating the importance of spinal cord angulation for DC. CONCLUSION The impact of DC on tractography quality is greatly impacted by acquisition geometry. To obtain a good-quality tractography, we propose as a future perspective to adapt the acquisition geometry to that of the patient by automatically adjusting the acquisition box.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corentin Dauleac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital neurologique et neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Laboratoire CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, INSA-Lyon, Université de Lyon I, Inserm U1206, Lyon, France
| | - Elise Bannier
- Université de Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Empenn, France.,Department of Radiology, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - François Cotton
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Laboratoire CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, INSA-Lyon, Université de Lyon I, Inserm U1206, Lyon, France.,Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Carole Frindel
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Laboratoire CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, INSA-Lyon, Université de Lyon I, Inserm U1206, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bautin P, Cohen-Adad J. Minimum detectable spinal cord atrophy with automatic segmentation: Investigations using an open-access dataset of healthy participants. NEUROIMAGE: CLINICAL 2021; 32:102849. [PMID: 34624638 PMCID: PMC8503570 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluate the robustness of an automated analysis pipeline for detecting SC atrophy. Simulate spinal cord atrophy and scan-rescan variability. Fully automated analysis method available on an open access database. Evaluation of sample size and inter/intra-subject variability for T1w and T2w images.
Spinal cord atrophy is a well-known biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS) and other diseases. It is measured by segmenting the spinal cord on an MRI image and computing the average cross-sectional area (CSA) over a few slices. Introduced about 25 years ago, this procedure is highly sensitive to the quality of the segmentation and is prone to rater-bias. Recently, fully-automated spinal cord segmentation methods, which remove the rater-bias and enable the automated analysis of large populations, have been introduced. A lingering question related to these automated methods is: How reliable are they at detecting atrophy? In this study, we evaluated the precision and accuracy of automated atrophy measurements by simulating scan-rescan experiments. Spinal cord MRI data from the open-access spine-generic project were used. The dataset aggregates 42 sites worldwide and consists of 260 healthy subjects and includes T1w and T2w contrasts. To simulate atrophy, each volume was globally rescaled at various scaling factors. Moreover, to simulate patient repositioning, random rigid transformations were applied. Using the DeepSeg algorithm from the Spinal Cord Toolbox, the spinal cord was segmented and vertebral levels were identified. Then, the average CSA between C3-C5 vertebral levels was computed for each Monte Carlo sample, allowing us to derive measures of atrophy, intra/inter-subject variability, and sample-size calculations. The minimum sample size required to detect an atrophy of 2% between unpaired study arms, commonly seen in MS studies, was 467 +/− 13.9 using T1w and 467 +/− 3.2 using T2w images. The minimum sample size to detect a longitudinal atrophy (between paired study arms) of 0.8% was 60 +/− 25.1 using T1w and 10 +/− 1.2 using T2w images. At the intra-subject level, the estimated CSA, observed in this study, showed good precision compared to other studies with COVs (across Monte Carlo transformations) of 0.8% for T1w and 0.6% for T2w images. While these sample sizes seem small, we would like to stress that these results correspond to a “best case” scenario, in that the dataset used here was of particularly good quality and the model for simulating atrophy does not encompass all the variability met in real-life datasets. The simulated atrophy and scan-rescan variability may over-simplify the biological reality. The proposed framework is open-source and available at https://csa-atrophy.readthedocs.io/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Bautin
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eden D, Gros C, Badji A, Dupont SM, De Leener B, Maranzano J, Zhuoquiong R, Liu Y, Granberg T, Ouellette R, Stawiarz L, Hillert J, Talbott J, Bannier E, Kerbrat A, Edan G, Labauge P, Callot V, Pelletier J, Audoin B, Rasoanandrianina H, Brisset JC, Valsasina P, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Bakshi R, Tauhid S, Prados F, Yiannakas M, Kearney H, Ciccarelli O, Smith SA, Andrada Treaba C, Mainero C, Lefeuvre J, Reich DS, Nair G, Shepherd TM, Charlson E, Tachibana Y, Hori M, Kamiya K, Chougar L, Narayanan S, Cohen-Adad J. Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. Brain 2020; 142:633-646. [PMID: 30715195 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord lesions detected on MRI hold important diagnostic and prognostic value for multiple sclerosis. Previous attempts to correlate lesion burden with clinical status have had limited success, however, suggesting that lesion location may be a contributor. Our aim was to explore the spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord, with respect to clinical status. We included 642 suspected or confirmed multiple sclerosis patients (31 clinically isolated syndrome, and 416 relapsing-remitting, 84 secondary progressive, and 73 primary progressive multiple sclerosis) from 13 clinical sites. Cervical spine lesions were manually delineated on T2- and T2*-weighted axial and sagittal MRI scans acquired at 3 or 7 T. With an automatic publicly-available analysis pipeline we produced voxelwise lesion frequency maps to identify predilection sites in various patient groups characterized by clinical subtype, Expanded Disability Status Scale score and disease duration. We also measured absolute and normalized lesion volumes in several regions of interest using an atlas-based approach, and evaluated differences within and between groups. The lateral funiculi were more frequently affected by lesions in progressive subtypes than in relapsing in voxelwise analysis (P < 0.001), which was further confirmed by absolute and normalized lesion volumes (P < 0.01). The central cord area was more often affected by lesions in primary progressive than relapse-remitting patients (P < 0.001). Between white and grey matter, the absolute lesion volume in the white matter was greater than in the grey matter in all phenotypes (P < 0.001); however when normalizing by each region, normalized lesion volumes were comparable between white and grey matter in primary progressive patients. Lesions appearing in the lateral funiculi and central cord area were significantly correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < 0.001). High lesion frequencies were observed in patients with a more aggressive disease course, rather than long disease duration. Lesions located in the lateral funiculi and central cord area of the cervical spine may influence clinical status in multiple sclerosis. This work shows the added value of cervical spine lesions, and provides an avenue for evaluating the distribution of spinal cord lesions in various patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Eden
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charley Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Atef Badji
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara M Dupont
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Josefina Maranzano
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Anatomy, Université de Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Ren Zhuoquiong
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yaou Liu
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China.,Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Russell Ouellette
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Leszek Stawiarz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jason Talbott
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elise Bannier
- CHU Rennes, Radiology Department, Rennes, France.,Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, EMPENN - ERL U 1228, Rennes, France
| | - Anne Kerbrat
- Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, EMPENN - ERL U 1228, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Neurology Department, Rennes, France
| | - Gilles Edan
- Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, EMPENN - ERL U 1228, Rennes, France.,CHU Rennes, Neurology Department, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Labauge
- MS Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Virginie Callot
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.,APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Pelletier
- APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France.,APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille
| | - Bertrand Audoin
- APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France.,APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille
| | - Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.,APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Brisset
- Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) ; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1; Hospices Civils de Lyon; CREATIS-LRMN, UMR 5220 CNRS and U 1044 INSERM; Lyon, France
| | - Paola Valsasina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rohit Bakshi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Shahamat Tauhid
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Ferran Prados
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London,UK.,Center for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marios Yiannakas
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London,UK
| | - Hugh Kearney
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London,UK
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London,UK
| | - Seth A Smith
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Lefeuvre
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Erik Charlson
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Masaaki Hori
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lydia Chougar
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Hospital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sridar Narayanan
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McCoy DB, Dupont SM, Gros C, Cohen-Adad J, Huie RJ, Ferguson A, Duong-Fernandez X, Thomas LH, Singh V, Narvid J, Pascual L, Kyritsis N, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC, Dhall S, Whetstone W, Talbott JF. Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:737-744. [PMID: 30923086 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Our aim was to use 2D convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and traumatic contusion injury from axial T2-weighted MR imaging in a cohort of patients with acute spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients who underwent 3T MR imaging within 24 hours of spinal cord injury were included. We developed an image-analysis pipeline integrating 2D convolutional neural networks for whole spinal cord and intramedullary spinal cord lesion segmentation. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare test segmentation results between our spinal cord injury convolutional neural network (Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation) and current state-of-the-art methods. Volumes of segmented lesions were then used in a linear regression analysis to determine associations with motor scores. RESULTS Compared with manual labeling, the average test set Dice coefficient for the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation model was 0.93 for spinal cord segmentation versus 0.80 for PropSeg and 0.90 for DeepSeg (both components of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). Linear mixed modeling showed a significant difference between Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .05). Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation showed significantly better adaptability to damaged areas compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .02). The contusion injury volumes based on automated segmentation were significantly associated with motor scores at admission (P = .002) and discharge (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation of the spinal cord compares favorably with available segmentation tools in a population with acute spinal cord injury. Volumes of injury derived from automated lesion segmentation with Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation correlate with measures of motor impairment in the acute phase. Targeted convolutional neural network training in acute spinal cord injury enhances algorithm performance for this patient population and provides clinically relevant metrics of cord injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B McCoy
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.B.M., S.M.D., J.N., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - S M Dupont
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.B.M., S.M.D., J.N., J.F.T.)
| | - C Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab (C.G., J.C.-A.), Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - J Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab (C.G., J.C.-A.), Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - R J Huie
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - A Ferguson
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - X Duong-Fernandez
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - L H Thomas
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - V Singh
- Departments of Neurology (V.S.)
| | - J Narvid
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.B.M., S.M.D., J.N., J.F.T.)
| | - L Pascual
- Orthopedic Surgery (L.P.), Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - N Kyritsis
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - M S Beattie
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - J C Bresnahan
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - S Dhall
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - W Whetstone
- Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.).,Brain and Spinal Injury Center (D.B.M., R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W.)
| | - J F Talbott
- From the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.B.M., S.M.D., J.N., J.F.T.) .,Neurological Surgery (R.J.H., A.F., X.D.-F., L.H.T., N.K., M.S.B., J.C.B., S.D., W.W., J.F.T.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gros C, De Leener B, Badji A, Maranzano J, Eden D, Dupont SM, Talbott J, Zhuoquiong R, Liu Y, Granberg T, Ouellette R, Tachibana Y, Hori M, Kamiya K, Chougar L, Stawiarz L, Hillert J, Bannier E, Kerbrat A, Edan G, Labauge P, Callot V, Pelletier J, Audoin B, Rasoanandrianina H, Brisset JC, Valsasina P, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Bakshi R, Tauhid S, Prados F, Yiannakas M, Kearney H, Ciccarelli O, Smith S, Treaba CA, Mainero C, Lefeuvre J, Reich DS, Nair G, Auclair V, McLaren DG, Martin AR, Fehlings MG, Vahdat S, Khatibi A, Doyon J, Shepherd T, Charlson E, Narayanan S, Cohen-Adad J. Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage 2019; 184:901-915. [PMID: 30300751 PMCID: PMC6759925 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI data provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation eliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of large-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across multi-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability related to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. In particular, a precise delineation of lesions is hindered by a broad heterogeneity of lesion contrast, size, location, and shape. The goal of this study was to develop a fully-automatic framework - robust to variability in both image parameters and clinical condition - for segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data of MS and non-MS cases. Scans of 1042 subjects (459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies) were included in this multi-site study (n = 30). Data spanned three contrasts (T1-, T2-, and T2∗-weighted) for a total of 1943 vol and featured large heterogeneity in terms of resolution, orientation, coverage, and clinical conditions. The proposed cord and lesion automatic segmentation approach is based on a sequence of two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To deal with the very small proportion of spinal cord and/or lesion voxels compared to the rest of the volume, a first CNN with 2D dilated convolutions detects the spinal cord centerline, followed by a second CNN with 3D convolutions that segments the spinal cord and/or lesions. CNNs were trained independently with the Dice loss. When compared against manual segmentation, our CNN-based approach showed a median Dice of 95% vs. 88% for PropSeg (p ≤ 0.05), a state-of-the-art spinal cord segmentation method. Regarding lesion segmentation on MS data, our framework provided a Dice of 60%, a relative volume difference of -15%, and a lesion-wise detection sensitivity and precision of 83% and 77%, respectively. In this study, we introduce a robust method to segment the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions on a variety of MRI contrasts. The proposed framework is open-source and readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charley Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Atef Badji
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Josefina Maranzano
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dominique Eden
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara M. Dupont
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason Talbott
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ren Zhuoquiong
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P. R. China
| | - Yaou Liu
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P. R. China
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, P. R. China
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Russell Ouellette
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lydia Chougar
- Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Hospital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Leszek Stawiarz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elise Bannier
- CHU Rennes, Radiology Department
- Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Visages U1128, France
| | - Anne Kerbrat
- Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Visages U1128, France
- CHU Rennes, Neurology Department
| | - Gilles Edan
- Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Visages U1128, France
- CHU Rennes, Neurology Department
| | - Pierre Labauge
- MS Unit. DPT of Neurology. University Hospital of Montpellier
| | - Virginie Callot
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France
- APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Pelletier
- APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
- APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille
| | - Bertrand Audoin
- APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
- APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille
| | | | - Jean-Christophe Brisset
- Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) ; Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 ; Hospices Civils de Lyon ; CREATIS-LRMN, UMR 5220 CNRS & U 1044 INSERM ; Lyon, France
| | - Paola Valsasina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A. Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rohit Bakshi
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Shahamat Tauhid
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Ferran Prados
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London (UK)
- Center for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marios Yiannakas
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London (UK)
| | - Hugh Kearney
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London (UK)
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London (UK)
| | | | | | - Caterina Mainero
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Jennifer Lefeuvre
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | - Govind Nair
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Allan R. Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shahabeddin Vahdat
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Neurology Department, Stanford University, US
| | - Ali Khatibi
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julien Doyon
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Sridar Narayanan
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|