1
|
MacNeil M, Benoit B, Disher T, Newman AJ, Campbell-Yeo M. Challenges and best practices for recruiting families of children with intellectual disabilities for health research. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2024:17446295241255178. [PMID: 38753497 DOI: 10.1177/17446295241255178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Research focused on children with intellectual disabilities has been of increasing interest over the last two decades. However, a considerable lag in the amount of research that is representative and generalizable to this population in comparison to neurotypical children remains, largely attributed to issues with participant engagement and recruitment. Challenges and barriers associated with engaging and recruiting this population include lack of research to provide a sound foundation of knowledge, ethical considerations, parental attitudes, family commitments, and organizational gatekeeping. Researchers can engage children and their families using participatory research methods, honouring the child's right to assent, and collaborating with parents. Recruitment strategies include partnering with organizations, working with parent and patient partners, and using remote methods. Employing evidence-informed engagement and recruitment strategies may provide substantial social and scientific value to the research field by ensuring that this underrepresented population benefits equitably from research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan MacNeil
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- MOM-LINC Lab, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Britney Benoit
- Rankin School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada
| | - Timothy Disher
- EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Aaron J Newman
- Department of Pediatrics, Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Marsha Campbell-Yeo
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- MOM-LINC Lab, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davis S, Pandor A, Sampson FC, Hamilton J, Nelson-Piercy C, Hunt BJ, Daru J, Goodacre S, Carser R, Rooney G, Clowes M. Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-176. [PMID: 38476084 PMCID: PMC11017156 DOI: 10.3310/dfwt3873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism is currently recommended for women assessed as being at high risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or in the 6 weeks after delivery (the puerperium). The decision to provide thromboprophylaxis involves weighing the benefits, harms and costs, which vary according to the individual's venous thromboembolism risk. It is unclear whether the United Kingdom's current risk stratification approach could be improved by further research. Objectives To quantify the current decision uncertainty associated with selecting women who are pregnant or in the puerperium for thromboprophylaxis and to estimate the value of one or more potential future studies that would reduce that uncertainty, while being feasible and acceptable to patients and clinicians. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed which was informed by a systematic review of risk assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. Expected value of perfect information analysis was used to determine which factors are associated with high decision uncertainty and should be the target of future research. To find out whether future studies would be acceptable and feasible, we held workshops with women who have experienced a blood clot or have been offered blood-thinning drugs and surveyed healthcare professionals. Expected value of sample information analysis was used to estimate the value of potential future research studies. Results The systematic review included 17 studies, comprising 19 unique externally validated risk assessment models and 1 internally validated model. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were highly variable ranging from 0% to 100% and 5% to 100%, respectively. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias and applicability concerns. The decision analysis found that there is substantial decision uncertainty regarding the use of risk assessment models to select high-risk women for antepartum prophylaxis and obese postpartum women for postpartum prophylaxis. The main source of decision uncertainty was uncertainty around the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. We found that a randomised controlled trial of thromboprophylaxis in obese postpartum women is likely to have substantial value and is more likely to be acceptable and feasible than a trial recruiting women who have had a previous venous thromboembolism. In unselected postpartum women and women following caesarean section, the poor performance of risk assessment models meant that offering prophylaxis based on these models had less favourable cost effectiveness with lower decision uncertainty. Limitations The performance of the risk assessment model for obese postpartum women has not been externally validated. Conclusions Future research should focus on estimating the efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium, and clinical trials would be more acceptable in women who have not had a previous venous thromboembolism. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020221094. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131021) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Davis
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdullah Pandor
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Fiona C Sampson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Beverley J Hunt
- Haematology and Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jahnavi Daru
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Steve Goodacre
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rosie Carser
- Patient and Public Involvement, Thrombosis UK, Llanwrda, UK
| | - Gill Rooney
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark Clowes
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Linkeviciute A, Canario R, Peccatori FA, Dierickx K. Caring for Pregnant Patients with Cancer: A Framework for Ethical and Patient-Centred Care. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:455. [PMID: 38275896 PMCID: PMC10813952 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Caring for pregnant cancer patients is clinically and ethically complex. There is no structured ethical guidance for healthcare professionals caring for these patients. (2) Objective: This concept paper proposes a theoretically grounded framework to support ethical and patient-centred care of pregnant cancer patients. (3) Methodological approach: The framework development was based on ethical models applicable to cancer care during pregnancy-namely principle-based approaches (biomedical ethics principles developed by Beauchamp and Childress and the European principles in bioethics and biolaw) and relational, patient-focused approaches (relational ethics, ethics of care and medical maternalism)-and informed by a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. (4) Results: Five foundational discussion themes, summarising the key ethical considerations that should be taken into account by healthcare professionals while discussing treatment and care options with these patients, were identified. This was further developed into a comprehensive ethics checklist that can be used during clinical appointments and highlights the need for a holistic view to patient treatment, care and counselling while providing ethical, patient-centric care. (5) Conclusion: The proposed framework was further operationalised into an ethics checklist for healthcare professionals that aims to help them anticipate and address ethical concerns that may arise when attending to pregnant cancer patients. Further studies exploring clinicians' attitudes towards cancer treatment in the course of pregnancy and patient experiences when diagnosed with cancer while pregnant and wider stakeholder engagement are needed to inform the development of further ethical, patient-centred guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alma Linkeviciute
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Canario
- Cancer Metastasis i3S-Institute for Research & Innovation in Health, R. Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal;
- Research Centre, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS—School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, R. Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scott TA, Mercedes CR, Lin HM, Katz D. Motivations and demographic differences in pregnant individuals in the decision to participate in research. Can J Anaesth 2024; 71:87-94. [PMID: 37919628 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02635-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although many patients agree to participate in research studies, many decline. The decision of whether or not to participate is especially complex in pregnant individuals as they may be concerned about both themselves and the fetus. We sought to understand patient reasoning for and demographic associations with participation in a trial surrounding the utility of epidural preservative-free morphine after successful vaginal delivery. METHODS We conducted a survey-based study in which parturients were approached within 36 hr after delivery to complete a survey assessing reasons for why they participated or not in the original trial. The survey also included self-reported demographics. Survey responses were categorized as follows: active participation, passive participation, ambivalence, aversion, miscommunication, clinical difficulty, unwilling to receive placebo, and screening failures. RESULTS The survey response rate was 47%. Having a bachelor's degree or higher was associated with participating in the study (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 3.64; P = 0.03). Race and ethnicity were not predictive of participation. Participants who self-identified as Black were more likely to select reasons of aversion for why they did not participate in the trial (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.00 to 6.75; P = 0.05). Seventy-three percent of participants who self-identified as Black and declined to participate selected aversion, compared with 31% of those who self-identified as non-Black. Additionally, 71% of participants who self-identified as Hispanic and declined to participate selected aversion, compared with 32% of those who self-identified as non-Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS These findings can help identify areas for improvement of participation of pregnant individuals in research studies. Demographic associations may influence participation and reasons for participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia A Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1010, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Cynthia R Mercedes
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hung-Mo Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Katz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alvarez M, Hotton EJ, Harding S, Ives J, Crofts JF, Wade J. Women's and midwives' views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:98. [PMID: 37322539 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment to intrapartum research is complex. Women are expected to understand unfamiliar terminology and assess potential harm versus benefit to their baby and themselves, often when an urgent intervention is required. Time pressures of intrapartum interventions are a major challenge for recruitment discussions taking place during labour, with research midwives expected to present, discuss and answer questions whilst maintaining equipoise. However, little is known about these interactions. An integrated qualitative study (IQS) was used to investigate information provision for women invited to participate in the Assist II feasibility study investigating the OdonAssist™-a novel device for use in assisted vaginal birth with an aim to generate a framework of good practice for information provision. METHODS Transcripts of in-depth interviews with women participants (n = 25), with recruiting midwives (n = 6) and recruitment discussions between midwives and women (n = 21), accepting or declining participation, were coded and interpreted using thematic analysis and content analysis to investigate what was helpful to women and what could be improved. RESULTS Recruiting women to intrapartum research is complicated by factors that impact on women's understanding and decision-making. Three key themes were derived from the data: (i) a woman-centred recruitment process, (ii) optimising the recruitment discussion and (iii) making a decision for two. CONCLUSION Despite evidence from the literature that women would like information provision and the research discussion to take place in the antenatal period, intrapartum studies still vary in the recruitment processes they offer women. Particularly concerning is that some women are given information for the first time whilst in labour, when they are known to feel particularly vulnerable, and contextual factors may influence decision-making; therefore, we propose a framework for good practice for information provision for research involving interventions initiated in the intrapartum period as a woman centred, and acceptable model of recruitment, which addresses the concerns of women and midwives and facilitates fair inclusion into intrapartum trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN. This qualitative research was undertaken as part of the ASSIST II Trial (trial registration number: ISRCTN38829082. Prospectively registered on 26/06/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Alvarez
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK.
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK.
| | - Emily J Hotton
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
| | - Sam Harding
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
- Research and Innovation, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna F Crofts
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kazma JM, Van Den Anker J, Ahmadzia HK. Pharmacoethics and pregnancy: Overcoming the therapeutic orphan stigma. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:483-490. [PMID: 34904271 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
There is paucity of evidence to support clinical decision making and counselling related to medication use in pregnancy. Despite multiple efforts from legislative bodies and advocacy groups, the inclusion of pregnant women in clinical drug trials assessing efficacy and safety remains scarce. Pregnancy can be complicated by multiple comorbidities that require pharmacological intervention; these interventions primarily target the pregnant woman but also sometimes have secondary effects for the foetus. The US Food and Drug Administration has issued multiple guidance documents on incorporating pregnant women in clinical trials to aid pharmaceutical companies in designing a protocol to ensure safety and adherence to ethical standards. Advances in paediatric pharmacology studies provide lessons for researchers on the best practice of designing clinical trials with inclusion of patients from special populations. In this review, we present the status of pregnant women in clinical trials, highlighting the ethical stigma and possible future directives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamil M Kazma
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington D.C., USA
| | - John Van Den Anker
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., USA.,Division of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Homa K Ahmadzia
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington D.C., USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Acceptability of Clinical Trials on COVID-19 during Pregnancy among Pregnant Women and Healthcare Providers: A Qualitative Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182010717. [PMID: 34682462 PMCID: PMC8535397 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Participation of pregnant women in clinical trials entails challenges mainly related to concerns about the risks for fetuses. We undertook a qualitative study from June to October 2020 to assess the acceptability of participating in COVID-19 clinical trials among pregnant women in Spain. Phenomenology and grounded theory were used as methodological approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 pregnant women and six healthcare providers. Women were unsure if pregnancy was a risk factor to acquire the infection or to develop severe disease and expressed the limited information they had received, which led to uncertainties and emotional suffering. They had concerns regarding participation in clinical trials on COVID-19, regardless of the drug under study. Healthcare providers alluded to the importance of involving pregnant women’s relatives at the recruitment visit of the clinical trial. These findings may be useful to facilitate pregnant women’s participation in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
O' Sullivan L, Feeney L, Crowley RK, Sukumar P, McAuliffe E, Doran P. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff. Trials 2021; 22:544. [PMID: 34407858 PMCID: PMC8371296 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The process of informed consent for enrolment to a clinical research study can be complex for both participants and research staff. Challenges include respecting the potential participant’s autonomy and information needs while simultaneously providing adequate information to enable an informed decision. Qualitative research with small sample sizes has added to our understanding of these challenges. However, there is value in garnering the perspectives of research participants and staff across larger samples to explore the impact of contextual factors (time spent, the timing of the discussion and the setting), on the informed consent process. Methods Research staff and research participants from Ireland and the UK were invited to complete an anonymous survey by post or online (research participants) and online (research staff). The surveys aimed to quantify the perceptions of research participants and staff regarding some contextual factors about the process of informed consent. The survey, which contained 14 and 16 multiple choice questions for research participants and staff respectively, was analysed using descriptive statistics. Both surveys included one optional, open-ended question, which were analysed thematically. Results Research participants (169) and research staff (115) completed the survey. Research participants were predominantly positive about the informed consent process but highlighted the importance of having sufficient time and the value of providing follow-up once the study concludes, e.g. providing results to participants. Most staff (74.4%) staff reported that they felt very confident or confident facilitating informed consent discussions, but 63% felt information leaflets were too long and/or complicated, 56% were concerned about whether participants had understood complex information and 40% felt that time constraints were a barrier. A dominant theme from the open-ended responses to the staff survey was the importance of adequate time and resources. Conclusions Research participants in this study were overwhelmingly positive about their experience of the informed consent process. However, research staff expressed concern about how much participants have understood and studies of patient comprehension of research study information would seem to confirm these fears. This study highlights the importance of allocating adequate time to informed consent discussions, and research staff could consider using Teach Back techniques. Trial Registration Not applicable Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia O' Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. .,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Laura Feeney
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rachel K Crowley
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Department of Endocrinology, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Prasanth Sukumar
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- University College Dublin Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Peter Doran
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wallace S, Houghton C, Dunne F. Participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): pregnant women's perceptions and experiences of the decision-making process. HRB Open Res 2021; 4:65. [PMID: 36568043 PMCID: PMC9751497 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13289.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research in pregnancy and childbirth is required to advance healthcare needs for this population. Fears around potential fetal risk and the history of drug scandals renders it an area of research that is somewhat neglected. Due to the growing medical complexities facing pregnant women, efforts have been made in recent times to recognise the ethical importance of including this population in clinical research. Although clinical trials are becoming more common in pregnancy, recruitment of this population remains difficult with a common assumption that pregnant women would be reluctant to participate in clinical trials. This study set out to explore pregnant women's perspectives and experiences of the decision-making process to participate in a randomised controlled trial of metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus (the EMERGE clinical trial). Methods: This study employed a qualitative descriptive design with thematic analysis. Data were collected by conducting individual semi-structured interviews (n=11) with participants (n=9) and decliners (n=2) of the EMERGE clinical trial. Results: The main findings reveal that a significant perception of personal benefit from participation was the biggest influence on women's decisions to participate. Concerns about the impact of gestational diabetes on their pregnancies, the option of a favourable intervention treatment, a low perception of risk associated with the trial and the opportunity to help medical research appeared to have significantly influenced their decision. Receiving detailed information, personal interactions with the study team, a perception of voluntariness in participation and accessibility of the trial positively impacted on women's decisions to participate. Conclusions: Personal contact during recruitment, presenting clear and thorough trial information, providing previous participant testimonials, and facilitating women to participate in clinical trials are all important strategies when trying to enhance recruitment in pregnancy trials. Further research on pregnant women declining participation in clinical trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead Wallace
- HRB Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland,
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Áras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Fidelma Dunne
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lemas DJ, Wright L, Flood-Grady E, Francois M, Chen L, Hentschel A, Du X, Hsiao CJ, Chen H, Neu J, Theis RP, Shenkman E, Krieger J. Perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on longitudinal clinical studies that require non-invasive biospecimen collection - a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:67. [PMID: 33472584 PMCID: PMC7816422 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03541-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Investigation of the microbiome during early life has stimulated an increasing number of cohort studies in pregnant and breastfeeding women that require non-invasive biospecimen collection. The objective of this study was to explore pregnant and breastfeeding women's perspectives on longitudinal clinical studies that require non-invasive biospecimen collection and how they relate to study logistics and research participation. METHODS We completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with 40 women who were either pregnant (n = 20) or breastfeeding (n = 20) to identify their understanding of longitudinal clinical research, the motivations and barriers to their participation in such research, and their preferences for providing non-invasive biospecimen samples. RESULTS Perspectives on research participation were focused on breastfeeding and perinatal education. Participants cited direct benefits of research participation that included flexible childcare, lactation support, and incentives and compensation. Healthcare providers, physician offices, and social media were cited as credible sources and channels for recruitment. Participants viewed lengthy study visits and child protection as the primary barriers to research participation. The barriers to biospecimen collection were centered on stool sampling, inadequate instructions, and drop-off convenience. CONCLUSION Women in this study were interested in participating in clinical studies that require non-invasive biospecimen collection, and motivations to participate center on breastfeeding and the potential to make a scientific contribution that helps others. Effectively recruiting pregnant or breastfeeding participants for longitudinal microbiome studies requires protocols that account for participant interests and consideration for their time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominick J Lemas
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. .,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. .,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - Lauren Wright
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Elizabeth Flood-Grady
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Magda Francois
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Lynn Chen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Austen Hentschel
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Xinsong Du
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Chu J Hsiao
- MD-PhD Training Program University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Huan Chen
- Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Josef Neu
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Ryan P Theis
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Janice Krieger
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alpuim Costa D, Nobre JG, de Almeida SB, Ferreira MH, Gonçalves I, Braga S, Pais D. Cancer During Pregnancy: How to Handle the Bioethical Dilemmas?-A Scoping Review With Paradigmatic Cases-Based Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:598508. [PMID: 33425755 PMCID: PMC7787159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethical issues that arise during the care of a pregnant woman with cancer are challenging to physicians, policymakers, lawyers, and the bioethics community. The main purpose of this scoping review is to summarize existing literature regarding the bioethical dilemmas when a conflict arises in the maternal-fetus dyad, like the one related to cancer and pregnancy outcomes. Moreover, we illustrate the decision-making process of real-life case reports. Published data were searched through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, as well as in grey literature, using appropriate controlled keywords in English and Portuguese. After identification, screening, eligibility and data extraction from the articles, a total of 50 was selected. There are several established ethical frameworks for conflict resolution and decision-making. Pragmatic theoretical approaches include case-based analysis, the ethics of care, feminist theory, and traditional ethical principlism that scrutinizes the framework of autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. In addition, society and practitioner values could mediate this complex ethical interplay. The physician must balance autonomy and beneficence-based obligations to the pregnant woman with cancer, along with beneficence-based obligations to the fetus. Ethical challenges have received less attention in the literature, particularly before the third trimester of pregnancy. Best, unbiased and balanced information must be granted both to the patient and to the family, regarding the benefits and harms for the woman herself as well as for the fetal outcome. Based on a previously validated method for analyzing and working up clinical ethical problems, we suggest an adaptation of an algorithm for biomedical decision-making in cancer during pregnancy, including recommendations that can facilitate counseling and help reduce the suffering of the patient and her family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Alpuim Costa
- CUF Oncologia, Haematology and Oncology Department, Lisbon, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Inês Gonçalves
- Hospital CUF Almada, Emergency Department, Almada, Portugal
| | - Sofia Braga
- CUF Oncologia, Haematology and Oncology Department, Lisbon, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Lisbon, Portugal.,Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca EPE, Oncology Department, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Diogo Pais
- Ethics Department, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Houghton C, Dowling M, Meskell P, Hunter A, Gardner H, Conway A, Treweek S, Sutcliffe K, Noyes J, Devane D, Nicholas JR, Biesty LM. Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:MR000045. [PMID: 33026107 PMCID: PMC8078544 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials (also referred to as 'randomised controlled trials' or 'trials') are the optimal way to minimise bias in evaluating the effects of competing treatments, therapies and innovations in health care. It is important to achieve the required sample size for a trial, otherwise trialists may not be able to draw conclusive results leading to research waste and raising ethical questions about trial participation. The reasons why potential participants may accept or decline participation are multifaceted. Yet, the evidence of effectiveness of interventions to improve recruitment to trials is not substantial and fails to recognise these individual decision-making processes. It is important to synthesise the experiences and perceptions of those invited to participate in randomised trials to better inform recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVES To explore potential trial participants' views and experiences of the recruitment process for participation. The specific objectives are to describe potential participants' perceptions and experiences of accepting or declining to participate in trials, to explore barriers and facilitators to trial participation, and to explore to what extent barriers and facilitators identified are addressed by strategies to improve recruitment evaluated in previous reviews of the effects of interventions including a Cochrane Methodology Review. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, LILACS, PsycINFO, ORRCA, and grey literature sources. We ran the most recent set of searches for which the results were incorporated into the review in July 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative and mixed-methods studies (with an identifiable qualitative component) that explored potential trial participants' experiences and perceptions of being invited to participate in a trial. We excluded studies that focused only on recruiters' perspectives, and trials solely involving children under 18 years, or adults who were assessed as having impaired mental capacity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Five review authors independently assessed the titles, abstracts and full texts identified by the search. We used the CART (completeness, accuracy, relevance, timeliness) criteria to exclude studies that had limited focus on the phenomenon of interest. We used QSR NVivo to extract and manage the data. We assessed methodological limitations using the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tool. We used thematic synthesis to analyse and synthesise the evidence. This provided analytical themes and a conceptual model. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each finding. Our findings were integrated with two previous intervention effectiveness reviews by juxtaposing the quantitative and qualitative findings in a matrix. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 studies (published in 30 papers) in our synthesis. Twenty-two key findings were produced under three broad themes (with six subthemes) to capture the experience of being invited to participate in a trial and making the decision whether to participate. Most of these findings had moderate to high confidence. We identified factors from the trial itself that influenced participation. These included how trial information was communicated, and elements of the trial such as the time commitment that might be considered burdensome. The second theme related to personal factors such as how other people can influence the individual's decision; and how a personal understanding of potential harms and benefits could impact on the decision. Finally, the potential benefits of participation were found to be key to the decision to participate, namely personal benefits such as access to new treatments, but also the chance to make a difference and help others. The conceptual model we developed presents the decision-making process as a gauge and the factors that influence whether the person will, or will not, take part. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This qualitative evidence synthesis has provided comprehensive insight into the complexity of factors that influence a person's decision whether to participate in a trial. We developed key questions that trialists can ask when developing their recruitment strategy. In addition, our conceptual model emphasises the need for participant-centred approaches to recruitment. We demonstrated moderate to high level confidence in our findings, which in some way can be attributed to the large volume of highly relevant studies in this field. We recommend that these insights be used to direct or influence or underpin future recruitment strategies that are developed in a participant-driven way that ultimately improves trial conduct and reduces research waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew Hunter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aislinn Conway
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katy Sutcliffe
- Department of Social Science, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jane R Nicholas
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Linda M Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kinnear FJ, Hamilton-Shield JP, Stensel DJ, Bayly G, Searle A, Thackray AE, Lithander FE. Nutrition and physical activity intervention for families with familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:42. [PMID: 32266080 PMCID: PMC7115059 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00584-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Untreated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) causes high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Despite pharmacological treatment, many treated individuals remain at higher CVD risk than non-affected individuals. This may be due to LDL-C targets not being met and presence of other CVD risk factors. Adhering to dietary and physical activity (PA) recommendations developed for individuals with FH may further reduce CVD risk. However, there is insufficient research to support the efficacy of adhering to these guidelines on LDL-C and other CVD risk factors. The need for studies to investigate the effectiveness of nutrition and PA interventions in the FH population has been widely recognised and recommended. This paper describes the protocol of a pilot, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a specifically developed nutrition and PA intervention aimed at improving the dietary intakes and PA levels of families with FH. Methods A two-arm randomised waitlist-controlled pilot trial will be conducted across three National Health Service (NHS) sites in England, UK. Twenty-four young people with FH, aged 10-18 years, and their affected parent, will be recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention or waitlist and usual care control. The primary aim is to provide evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the intervention, explored quantitatively (rates of recruitment, retention and outcome measure completeness) and qualitatively (qualitative interviews). The secondary aim is to provide evidence for the potential efficacy of the intervention on dietary intake, PA, sedentary time, body composition, CVD risk factors and quality of life determined at baseline and endpoint assessments. The intervention will involve an hour-long consultation with a dietitian at baseline and four follow-up contacts across the 12-week intervention. It has been specifically developed for use with individuals with FH and incorporates behavioural change techniques to target identified enablers and barriers to adherence in this population. Discussion This trial will estimate the feasibility and acceptability of the nutrition and PA intervention delivered to young people and parents with FH. If appropriate, this study can be used to inform the design of an adequately powered definitive trial. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN24880714. Registered 07/06/2018, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN24880714.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona J Kinnear
- 1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julian P Hamilton-Shield
- 1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - David J Stensel
- 2National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, UK.,3University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK
| | - Graham Bayly
- 4Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Aidan Searle
- 1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alice E Thackray
- 2National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, UK.,3University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK
| | - Fiona E Lithander
- 1NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Nutrition Theme), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brennan M, Clarke M, Devane D, Dowling M. A qualitative study of the factors influencing recruitment to a pilot trial on the prevention of striae gravidarum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:103. [PMID: 32050916 PMCID: PMC7017448 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-2781-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Striae gravidarum are a common occurrence in pregnancy and many women use a topical product to prevent their development or lessen their appearance if they do develop. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of many of the products used by women. This study arose from challenges in recruitment to a pilot randomised trial (ISRCTN trial registration number:76992326) designed to evaluate the feasibility of a definitive trial to compare a moisturising oil to no treatment in the prevention and reduction in severity of striae gravidarum. The study reported here explored the factors influencing recruitment to that pilot trial. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken involving primigravid women attending an Irish maternity hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured telephone interviews over a four-week period and analysed using the framework method of analysis. Fifteen interview transcripts were included in the analysis. Results Four main themes consisting of twelve categories were identified from the interview data. The themes focused on women’s prevention of stretch marks and their choice of anti-stretch mark product, who and what influenced that choice and influences on trial participation. In relation to influences on trial participation, the possibility of being randomised to the non- intervention or control group was a deterrent for many women. Conclusions The prevention of stretch marks is important to pregnant women, as is their choice of product to prevent them. Offering women the opportunity to be part of a trial that would be of low burden and would test a well-known product may optimise recruitment. However, reluctance to be randomised because of the possibility of being allocated to the non-intervention control group suggests that further work is needed in this field on how best to communicate uncertainty to potential participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Brennan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hayes-Ryan D, Meaney S, Nolan C, O'Donoghue K. An exploration of women's experience of taking part in a randomized controlled trial of a diagnostic test during pregnancy: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2019; 23:75-83. [PMID: 31578808 PMCID: PMC6978861 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore pregnant women's views of participation in a clinical research trial while pregnant. DESIGN Prospective nested qualitative cohort study embedded within a national, multi-site randomized controlled trial of a diagnostic test for preeclampsia: Placental Growth Factor. One-to-one in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 19 women who had recently participated in the trial at a single recruiting site. The interviews were conducted in private, recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. SETTING Single tertiary maternity hospital currently recruiting eligible women onto an on-going randomized controlled trial (NCT02881073). PARTICIPANTS Women who had participated in the PARROT Ireland randomized controlled trial during their recent pregnancy. METHODS Thematic analysis was utilized. Each line of the transcribed interviews was coded into a category by two researchers. The resultant categories were reviewed, and those with similarities were pooled allowing the development of themes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Women's opinions and experience of participation in a randomized controlled trial of an interventional diagnostic test during their pregnancy. RESULTS Four major themes were identified as follows: (a) Understanding of preeclampsia, (b) Motivators for clinical trial participation, (c) Barriers to decision making and (d) Influence of PARROT Ireland on pregnancy experience. CONCLUSIONS Women are generally interested and positively inclined to participate in research during pregnancy. The potential of risk is an important consideration for eligible pregnant woman. Information and support by both researchers and clinicians are paramount in aiding women's understanding of a research trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Hayes-Ryan
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Cork, Ireland
| | - Sarah Meaney
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Caroline Nolan
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Keelin O'Donoghue
- The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nikčević AV, Dodd Z, Prior J, O'Gorman N, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Reasons for accepting or declining participation in the ASPRE trial: A qualitative study with women at high risk of preterm pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:1127-1135. [PMID: 31479510 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors that affected the decision of pregnant women at high risk for pre-eclampsia (PE) in accepting or declining participation in a medicated clinical trial (ASPRE) for the prevention of preterm PE. METHOD This was a qualitative, cross-sectional study. A purposive sample of 14 participants and 13 decliners of the ASPRE trial were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using template analysis. RESULTS For participants, their high-risk status seems to have motivated them to take part in the trial. This was enabled by their perception that the trial drug aspirin was commonly used, the safety of the procedure, and the belief that they will be in receipt of extra monitoring in pregnancy. Decliners expressed discomfort about taking medications in pregnancy, and about the presence of the placebo arm; they seemed to be motivated by desire to reduce harm. Satisfaction with the information provided by the medical professionals was also influential in women's decision making, and so were the views of their partners and other trusted individuals. CONCLUSION Pregnant women's motivation to take part or to decline participation in a medicated trail can be understood as an attempt to cope with the threat posed by their high-risk status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana V Nikčević
- Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston-Upon-Thames, UK
| | - Zoe Dodd
- Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston-Upon-Thames, UK
| | - Jess Prior
- Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston-Upon-Thames, UK
| | - Neil O'Gorman
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Liona C Poon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kypros H Nicolaides
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Harvey ME, David AL, Dyer J, Spencer R. Pregnant women's experiences and perceptions of participating in the EVERREST prospective study; a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:144. [PMID: 31039749 PMCID: PMC6492343 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The EVERREST Prospective Study is a multicentre observational cohort study of pregnancies affected by severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. The study recruits women with singleton pregnancies where the estimated fetal weight is less than the 3rd centile and below 600 g, between 20 + 0 and 26 + 6 weeks of pregnancy, in the absence of a known chromosomal, structural or infective cause. Method The reported study was retrospective descriptive qualitative interview study of women who had participated in the EVERREST Prospective Study. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of pregnant women taking part in research during a pregnancy affected by severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. Audio-recorded semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 women, at least 1 year after delivery of their baby. Two of these pregnancies had ended in stillbirth and one in neonatal death, reflecting the outcomes seen in the EVERREST Prospective Study. Participants gave informed consent, were 16 years or older and were interviewed in English. A topic guide was used to ensure a consistent approach. Questions focused on pregnancy experiences, involvement with the EVERREST study and potential involvement in future research. Recordings were transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis using NVivo10. Results Four broad themes were identified; ‘before joining the EVERREST Prospective Study’, ‘participating in research’, ‘information and support’ and ‘looking back and looking forwards’. Each broad theme incorporated several subthemes. All participants recalled their reaction to being told their baby was smaller than expected. The way this news was given had a lasting impact. A range of benefits of participation in the EVERREST Prospective Study were described and the participants were positive about the way it was conducted. As a consequence, they were receptive to participating in future research. However, the findings suggest that research teams should be sensitive when approaching families at a difficult time or when they are already participating in other research. Conclusions This study highlights the willingness of pregnant women to participate in research and identifies strategies for researchers to engage participants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2277-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merryl E Harvey
- Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, City South Campus, Westbourne Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TN, UK
| | - Anna L David
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Jade Dyer
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Rebecca Spencer
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-98 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hill M, Lewis C, Riddington M, Crowe B, DeVile C, David AL, Semler O, Westgren M, Götherström C, Chitty LS. Stakeholder views and attitudes towards prenatal and postnatal transplantation of fetal mesenchymal stem cells to treat Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:1244-1253. [PMID: 30918362 PMCID: PMC6777523 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0387-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The Boost Brittle Bones Before Birth (BOOSTB4) clinical trial is investigating the safety and efficacy of transplanting fetal derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) prenatally and/or in early postnatal life to treat severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI). This study aimed to explore stakeholder views to understand perceived benefits or concerns, identify ethical issues and establish protocols for support and counselling. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with three groups; 1. Adults affected with OI, with and without children, and parents of children affected with OI; 2. Health professionals who work with patients with OI; 3. Patient advocates from relevant patient support groups. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Interviews with 56 participants revealed generally positive views towards using fetal MSC transplantation to treat OI. Early treatment was considered advantageous for preventing fractures and reducing severity and could bring psychological benefits for parents. Common concerns were procedure safety, short/long-term side effects and whether transplantation would be effective. Difficulties inherent in decision-making were frequently discussed, as treatment efficacy is unknown and, by necessity, parents will make decisions at a time when they are vulnerable. Support needs may differ where there is a family history of OI compared to an unexpected diagnosis of OI. Explaining fetal MSC transplantation in a way that all parents can understand, clear expectation setting, psychological support and time for reflection during the decision-making process will be crucial to allow parents to make informed decisions about participation in the BOOSTB4 clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Hill
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
| | - Celine Lewis
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Megan Riddington
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Belinda Crowe
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine DeVile
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna L David
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver Semler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Magnus Westgren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention & Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Götherström
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention & Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Monteiro TM, Katz L, Bento SF, Amorim MM, Moriel PC, Pacagnella RC. Reasons given by pregnant women for participating in a clinical trial aimed at preventing premature delivery: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:97. [PMID: 30894167 PMCID: PMC6425624 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical trials, pregnant women are potentially vulnerable, and the fetus is exposed to the intervention. This study aimed to identify the reasons that led pregnant women at a high risk of premature delivery to participate in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS The women participating in the main trial were contacted by telephone postpartum and invited to answer an open questionnaire in a cross-sectional study. Data were collected by telephone and analyzed using thematic analysis. After the analysis categories were defined, all the answers were reviewed, categorized and grouped. A descriptive summary of the content of each category was then made. RESULTS Overall, 208 women from different geographical regions of the country agreed to participate. Four categories were identified: 1) The risk of losing the baby; 2) A previous experience of premature delivery; 3) The role of the doctor and other health professionals, and 4) The availability of quality medical care and free medication. The main reason given for agreeing to participate was to reduce the risks associated with the baby being born prematurely, particularly when the woman herself or someone close to her had already experienced premature delivery. Other reasons were having received clear guidance and explanations from the doctor regarding prematurity and about the study and being given the opportunity to receive free treatment with greater access to the public healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS The decision to participate in a clinical trial is not easy, particularly when the individual is vulnerable and in a critical situation as in the case of a pregnant woman at a high risk of delivering prematurely. Fears and uncertainties regarding the pregnancy outcome, as well as the woman's previous experiences and her awareness of the actual risks she faces will affect her decision regarding whether or not to participate. Recruitment challenges could be overcome by ensuring that the research team provides adequate information and support, thus creating a bond with participants that would foster a sense of safety and trust in the study proposals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaís M. Monteiro
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
| | - Leila Katz
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
| | - Silvana F. Bento
- Prof. Dr. José A Pinotti Women’s Hospital, Center of Integral Services for the Health of Women (CAISM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Melania M. Amorim
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
| | - Patrícia C. Moriel
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wada K, Evans MK, de Vrijer B, Nisker J. Clinical Research With Pregnant Women: Perspectives of Pregnant Women, Health Care Providers, and Researchers. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2018; 28:2033-2047. [PMID: 29865990 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318773724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Limited clinical research with pregnant women has resulted in insufficient data to promote evidence-informed prenatal care. Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to explore how research with pregnant women would be determined ethically acceptable from the perspectives of pregnant women, health care providers, and researchers in reproductive sciences. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 pregnant women, 10 health care providers, and nine reproductive science researchers. All three groups suggested the importance of informed consent and that permissible risk would be very limited and complex, being dependent on the personal benefits and risks of each particular study. Pregnant women, clinicians, and researchers shared concerns about the well-being of the woman and her fetus, and expressed a dilemma between promoting research for evidence-informed prenatal care while securing the safety in the course of research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoko Wada
- 1 St. Joseph's Health Centre Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Jeff Nisker
- 2 Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Houghton G, Kingdon C, Dower M, Shakur-Still H, Alfirevic Z. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants. BJOG 2018; 125:1744-1753. [PMID: 29911309 PMCID: PMC6283048 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective The World Maternal Antifibrinolytic (WOMAN) Trial was the first in the UK to use the option of waiver of informed consent at the time of an obstetric emergency. This qualitative study aimed to investigate participants’ views of the acceptability of the recruitment methods used. Design Qualitative study using in‐depth interviews with women who did and did not give consent at the time of their recruitment to the WOMAN Trial. Setting Highest UK recruitment site for the WOMAN Trial (129/569). Interviews were conducted in participants’ homes. Population About 40 of the 129 women who were recruited to the WOMAN Trial at one UK site were invited to take part, 15 women were interviewed. Methods Qualitative, interview study. Main outcome measures Facilitators and barriers to successful recruitment during obstetric emergencies. Guidance for future researchers. Results Findings revealed that what is important is not so much the consent process used or a signature on a form, but the way in which consent is obtained. Clinicians who successfully negotiate consent to research during childbirth emergencies engage in a ‘humane choreography’ of words and actions. This emphasises the importance of prompt decision‐making and treatment, while respecting the woman's personal situation and experience. Conclusions Our findings do not support a single pathway to consent in the context of an obstetric emergency. Women understand that consent to research in an emergency is complex. Clinicians’ skills in considering the clinical, ethical, and emotional aspects within the context of the clinical emergency can hamper or promote women's satisfaction. Tweetable abstract Study reports on women's views of consent to research in an obstetric emergency. Plain Language Summary Study reports on women's views of consent to research in an obstetric emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Houghton
- Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - C Kingdon
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - M Dower
- Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - H Shakur-Still
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Z Alfirevic
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Lacey SL, Sanderman E, Smith CA. Acupuncture in reproductive medicine: the motivations of infertile women to participate in a randomised controlled trial. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 39:112-120. [PMID: 28391738 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2017.1308349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials are the gold standard in medical research and are challenging to conduct successfully since high numbers of participants are needed to produce robust results. Therefore, it is important to understand what motivates patients to participate in one, particularly in Reproductive Medicine where the conduct of RCTs is rare. Just as it is important to evaluate medical interventions, it is equally important that adjuvant therapies are properly assessed. There has been an increased interest in adding acupuncture to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in the hope of increasing the chance of pregnancy and a live birth. However, evidence that acupuncture assists IVF outcomes is conflicted and insight into the experiences and motivations of infertile women is important. This paper describes how an invitation to participate in an RCT of acupuncture as an adjuvant to IVF was received by infertile women and how they processed their decision to participate. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 50 infertile women recruited from the RCT sample cohort. Recruitment aimed for maximum variation in social demographics. The data were saturated. Data pertaining to the theme of motivations to participate in an RCT were subjected to semantic thematic analysis. RESULTS Two subthemes contained categories related to (a) the reasons women put forward for participation in an RCT, and (b) the rationale that underpinned and surrounded their decision. Women described themselves as active agents searching for a better outcome for their infertility or improved outcomes for women in the future. Their decision to participate in an RCT was motivated by factors such as opportunity, novelty and a value of science and was made after weighing various risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS The decision to participate in an RCT was an informed one. Infertile women in a stressful treatment situation participated in an RCT in the hope of finding a therapy to improve IVF outcomes for themselves and for other infertile women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheryl L de Lacey
- a School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sanderman
- a School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Caroline A Smith
- b National Institute of Complementary Medicine, Western Sydney University , Penrith , Sydney , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Strömmer S, Lawrence W, Rose T, Vogel C, Watson D, Bottell JN, Parmenter J, Harvey NC, Cooper C, Inskip H, Baird J, Barker M. Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation. Soc Sci Med 2018; 200:73-82. [PMID: 29421474 PMCID: PMC6033317 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 12/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify reasons underlying women's refusal to participate in a pregnancy trial and to identify ways of increasing recruitment. DESIGN Mixed methods study using a questionnaire and qualitative interviews. SAMPLE A questionnaire asking them to indicate reasons for their decision was completed by 296 pregnant women who declined to participate in one of two trials of nutritional supplementation in a large teaching hospital in southern England. Qualitative interview data were collected from two samples of pregnant women: 1) 30 women who declined to participate in a trial but completed the questionnaire; and 2) 44 women who participated in a trial. RESULTS Questionnaire data from pregnant women who declined to participate suggested the major barriers to participation were study requirements, including taking study medication, having a bone scan or blood tests, or being too busy. Thematic analysis of interview data identified differences in self-efficacy and levels of trust in medical research between participants and decliners. Participants believed that the research would cause no harm, while decliners felt they or their unborn child would be at risk. When faced with potential obstacles, participants found ways around them while decliners felt they were insurmountable. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment methods for pregnancy trials should focus on building women's trust in the trial, and on enhancing women's self-efficacy so they feel able to meet trial requirements. Suggestions for building trust include investing time in open, honest discussion of the risks and benefits of participation, improving visibility of the research team, testimonials from previous participants and advertising study safety and ethical conduct. Self-efficacy can be enhanced by training research staff in empowering styles of communication enabling women to feel heard and supported to problem-solve. These strategies could be implemented relatively easily into pregnancy trial protocols, and their effectiveness tested through their impact on recruitment rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Strömmer
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - Wendy Lawrence
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Taylor Rose
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Christina Vogel
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Daniella Watson
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Joanne N Bottell
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Janice Parmenter
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Hazel Inskip
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Janis Baird
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Mary Barker
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rowlands C, Rooshenas L, Fairhurst K, Rees J, Gamble C, Blazeby JM. Detailed systematic analysis of recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials in patients with an unscheduled admission to hospital. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e018581. [PMID: 29420230 PMCID: PMC5829602 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the design and findings of recruitment studies in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with an unscheduled hospital admission (UHA), to consider how to optimise recruitment in future RCTs of this nature. DESIGN Studies within the ORRCA database (Online Resource for Recruitment Research in Clinical TriAls; www.orrca.org.uk) that reported on recruitment to RCTs involving UHAs in patients >18 years were included. Extracted data included trial clinical details, and the rationale and main findings of the recruitment study. RESULTS Of 3114 articles populating ORRCA, 39 recruitment studies were eligible, focusing on 68 real and 13 hypothetical host RCTs. Four studies were prospectively planned investigations of recruitment interventions, one of which was a nested RCT. Most recruitment papers were reports of recruitment experiences from one or more 'real' RCTs (n=24) or studies using hypothetical RCTs (n=11). Rationales for conducting recruitment studies included limited time for informed consent (IC) and patients being too unwell to provide IC. Methods to optimise recruitment included providing patients with trial information in the prehospital setting, technology to allow recruiters to cover multiple sites, screening logs to uncover recruitment barriers, and verbal rather than written information and consent. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of high-quality research into recruitment in RCTs involving UHAs with only one nested randomised study evaluating a recruitment intervention. Among the remaining studies, methods to optimise recruitment focused on how to improve information provision in the prehospital setting and use of screening logs. Future research in this setting should focus on the prospective evaluation of the well-developed interventions to optimise recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ceri Rowlands
- MRC ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- MRC ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol
| | - Katherine Fairhurst
- MRC ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol
| | - Jonathan Rees
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- MRC ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meshaka R, Jeffares S, Sadrudin F, Huisman N, Saravanan P. Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-Methodology. Health Expect 2017; 20:188-197. [PMID: 26918613 PMCID: PMC5354068 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient participation in study design is paramount to design studies that are acceptable to patients. Despite an increase in research involving pregnant women, relatively little is known about the motivational factors that govern their decision to be involved in a clinical trial, compared to other patient groups. OBJECTIVE To better understand the viewpoints of pregnant women who take part in clinical trials. METHOD We chose to use Q-Methodology, a method of exploring the structure of opinions surrounding a topic. We developed a set of 40 statements that encompassed the reasons why pregnant women might want to take part in research and 30 research participants from the PRiDE study (an observational trial investigating the role of micronutrients in gestational diabetes) were asked to rank them in order of agreement. The finished matrices from each participant were compared and analysed to produce capturing viewpoints. RESULTS About 30 women aged 19-40 involved in the PRiDE study completed the questionnaire. There were two overarching motivators that emerged: a willingness to help medical research and improve our knowledge of medical science, and having a personal connection to the disease, therefore a potential fear of being affected by it. A third, less significant viewpoint, was that of a lack of inconvenience being a motivating factor. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION Understanding what motivates pregnant women to decide to take part in a research study is valuable and helps researchers maximize their uptake and retention rates when designing a trial involving pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Jeffares
- Institute of Local Government StudiesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | | | | | - Ponnusamy Saravanan
- Endocrinology & MetabolismWarwick Medical SchoolUniversity of Warwick & George Eliot HospitalCoventryUK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Res 2017; 6:66. [PMID: 29167732 PMCID: PMC5676196 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing the collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we will built a consent workflow using a rising technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. Additionally, it removes the need for third parties, and gives participative control to the peer-to-peer users. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain; thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each revision of the protocol, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in a standard open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: timestamped consent status with regards to each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted, and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered as a robust proof of data. In the future, we think that the complex data flow of a clinical trial can be tracked using Blockchain. Moreover, a blockchain core functionality, named Smart Contract, can help prevent clinical trial events not to happen in the right chronological order: including patients before they consented or analysing case report forms data before freezing the database. This will help reaching reliability, security, and transparency, and could be a consistent step towards reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Ravaud
- Département d'Epidémiologie Clinique, APHP, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche Inserm Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité (U1153), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Res 2017; 6:66. [PMID: 29167732 PMCID: PMC5676196 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing for collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we build a consent workflow using a trending technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain, thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each protocol revision, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in an open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: a time-stamped consent status regarding each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered a robust proof of data. However, in a live clinical trial, the authentication system should be strengthened to remove the need for third parties, here trial stakeholders, and give participative control to the peer users. In the future, the complex data flow of a clinical trial could be tracked by using Blockchain, which core functionality, named Smart Contract, could help prevent clinical trial events not occurring in the correct chronological order, for example including patients before they consented or analysing case report form data before freezing the database. Globally, Blockchain could help with reliability, security, transparency and could be a consistent step toward reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Ravaud
- Département d'Epidémiologie Clinique, APHP, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche Inserm Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité (U1153), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Res 2017; 6:66. [PMID: 29167732 PMCID: PMC5676196 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing for collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we build a consent workflow using a trending technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain, thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each protocol revision, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in an open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: a time-stamped consent status regarding each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered a robust proof of data. However, in a live clinical trial, the authentication system should be strengthened to remove the need for third parties, here trial stakeholders, and give participative control to the peer users. In the future, the complex data flow of a clinical trial could be tracked by using Blockchain, which core functionality, named Smart Contract, could help prevent clinical trial events not occurring in the correct chronological order, for example including patients before they consented or analysing case report form data before freezing the database. Globally, Blockchain could help with reliability, security, transparency and could be a consistent step toward reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Ravaud
- Département d'Epidémiologie Clinique, APHP, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche Inserm Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité (U1153), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Res 2017; 6:66. [PMID: 29167732 PMCID: PMC5676196 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing the collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we will built a consent workflow using a rising technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. Additionally, it removes the need for third parties, and gives participative control to the peer-to-peer users. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain; thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each revision of the protocol, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in a standard open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: timestamped consent status with regards to each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted, and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered as a robust proof of data. In the future, we think that the complex data flow of a clinical trial can be tracked using Blockchain. Moreover, a blockchain core functionality, named Smart Contract, can help prevent clinical trial events not to happen in the right chronological order: including patients before they consented or analysing case report forms data before freezing the database. This will help reaching reliability, security, and transparency, and could be a consistent step towards reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Ravaud
- Département d'Epidémiologie Clinique, APHP, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche Inserm Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité (U1153), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Benchoufi M, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Res 2017; 6:66. [PMID: 29167732 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10531.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial consent for protocols and their revisions should be transparent for patients and traceable for stakeholders. Our goal is to implement a process allowing the collection of patients' informed consent, which is bound to protocol revisions, storing and tracking the consent in a secure, unfalsifiable and publicly verifiable way, and enabling the sharing of this information in real time. For that, we will built a consent workflow using a rising technology called Blockchain. This is a distributed technology that brings a built-in layer of transparency and traceability. From a more general and prospective point of view, we believe Blockchain technology brings a paradigmatical shift to the entire clinical research field. We designed a Proof-of-Concept protocol consisting of time-stamping each step of the patient's consent collection using Blockchain; thus archiving and historicising the consent through cryptographic validation in a securely unfalsifiable and transparent way. For each revision of the protocol, consent was sought again. We obtained a single document, in a standard open format, that accounted for the whole consent collection process: timestamped consent status with regards to each version of the protocol. This document cannot be corrupted, and can be checked on any dedicated public website. It should be considered as a robust proof of data. However, in a live clinical trial, the authentication system should be strengthened in order to remove the need for third parties, here the trial stakeholders, and give participative control to the peer-to-peer users. In the future, we think that the complex data flow of a clinical trial can be tracked using Blockchain, that a blockchain core functionality, named Smart Contract, could help prevent clinical trial events not to happen in the right chronological order: for example including patients before they consented or analysing case report forms data before freezing the database. Globally, we think Blockchain will help with reliability, security, and transparency, and could be a consistent step towards reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Ravaud
- Département d'Epidémiologie Clinique, APHP, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche Inserm Epidémiologie et Statistique Paris Sorbonne Cité (U1153), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sheppard M, Spencer RN, Ashcroft R, David AL. Ethics and social acceptability of a proposed clinical trial using maternal gene therapy to treat severe early-onset fetal growth restriction. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2016; 47:484-491. [PMID: 26968870 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Revised: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ethical and social acceptability of a proposed clinical trial using maternal uterine artery vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene therapy to treat severe early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) in pregnant women. METHODS We conducted a literature review on the ethics and legality of experimental treatments in pregnant women, in particular advanced therapeutics. Issues that were identified from the literature helped develop interview guides for semistructured, qualitative interviews, carried out in four European countries, with 34 key stakeholders (disability groups, professional bodies and patient support groups) and 24 women/couples who had experienced a pregnancy affected by severe early-onset FGR. RESULTS The literature review identified two main questions: 'is it ethical to give a pregnant woman a potentially risky treatment from which she does not benefit directly?' and 'is it ethical to treat a condition of the unborn child, who may then be born with a serious disability when, without treatment, they would have died?'. The review concluded that there were no ethical or legal objections to the intervention, or to a trial of this intervention. Overall, respondents viewed the proposed trial in positive terms. Women were generally interested in participating in clinical trials that conferred a potential benefit to their unborn child. The risk of disability of the premature child was a concern, but not considered a major stumbling block for maternal VEGF gene therapy. CONCLUSIONS This study did not identify any fundamental or insurmountable objections to a trial of maternal gene therapy for severe early-onset FGR. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sheppard
- School of Law, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R N Spencer
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Ashcroft
- School of Law, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A L David
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wilman E, Megone C, Oliver S, Duley L, Gyte G, Wright JM. The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research. Trials 2015; 16:502. [PMID: 26537492 PMCID: PMC4634156 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting clinical trials with pre-term or sick infants is important if care for this population is to be underpinned by sound evidence. Yet approaching parents at this difficult time raises challenges for the obtaining of valid informed consent to such research. This study asked: what light does the empirical literature cast on an ethically defensible approach to the obtaining of informed consent in perinatal clinical trials? METHODS A systematic search identified 49 studies. Analysis began by applying philosophical frameworks which were then refined in light of the concepts emerging from empirical studies to present a coherent picture of a broad literature. RESULTS Between them, studies addressed the attitudes of both parents and clinicians concerning consent in neonatal trials; the validity of the consent process in the neonatal research context; and different possible methods of obtaining consent. CONCLUSIONS Despite a variety of opinions among parents and clinicians there is a strongly and widely held view that it is important that parents do give or decline consent for neonatal participation in trials. However, none of the range of existing consent processes reviewed by the research is satisfactory. A significant gap is evaluation of the widespread practice of emergency 'assent', in which parents assent or refuse their baby's participation as best they can during the emergency and later give full consent to ongoing participation and follow-up. Emergency assent has not been evaluated for its acceptability, how such a process would deal with bad outcomes such as neonatal death between assent and consent, or the extent to which late parental refusal might bias results. This review of a large number of empirical papers, while not making fundamental changes, has refined and developed the conceptual framework from philosophy for examining informed consent in this context.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics
- Emergencies
- Emotions
- Gestational Age
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Humans
- Infant, Newborn
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/mortality
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy
- Infant, Premature
- Motivation
- Parental Consent/ethics
- Parents/psychology
- Research Design
- Risk Assessment
- Volition
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Wilman
- Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - C Megone
- Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - S Oliver
- Social Science Research Unit and EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK.
| | - L Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - G Gyte
- National Childbirth Trust, London, UK.
| | - J M Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harter G, Darden J, McMenemy N, McElvy T, Hendrich A. Consent and enrollment process: achieving high enrollment rates for obstetric research. Appl Nurs Res 2015; 29:101-6. [PMID: 26856497 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Revised: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to study the development, design, and implementation of a patient consent and enrollment initiative to identify strategies that enhanced participation. BACKGROUND Consent and enrollment of patients, especially pregnant women, remains a challenge in healthcare research. Although many barriers have been identified, strategies to consistently improve consent and enrollment are less defined. METHODS A case study was conducted on a consent and enrollment approach aimed at optimizing participation of mothers who delivered their infants from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2013. Data were gathered through practitioner interviews, focus groups, and documentation review for each year of the study. RESULTS A total of 19,236 mothers enrolled, representing an 85% enrollment rate at the five study sites. Enrollment rates improved over time with increased nursing engagement in patient recruitment, site specific adaptations and patient education strategies. CONCLUSIONS Nursing's active role in implementation and rapid feedback loop of a multifaceted consent and enrollment program showed promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nancy McMenemy
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48236, USA
| | - Tiffany McElvy
- Sacred Heart Hospital of Pensacola, Pensacola, FL 32504, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ayers S, Sawyer A, Düring C, Rabe H. Parents report positive experiences about enrolling babies in a cord-related clinical trial before birth. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104:e164-70. [PMID: 25639827 DOI: 10.1111/apa.12922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Revised: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate parents' perceptions when they were asked to enrol their unborn preterm infant in a randomised trial involving delayed cord clamping or cord milking. METHODS The parents of 58 infants were asked to take part in a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to provide feedback about how they felt about their infants being included in the research project. A total of 37 parents - 15 fathers and 22 mothers - agreed to take part. RESULTS Parents were generally positive about their experiences of their baby taking part in the trial, but the findings raised some concerns about the validity of the consent obtained before delivery, as it was given in a hurry, and some participants had difficulty remembering that they had agreed to take part. Four themes were identified from the interviews: implications of taking part, reasons for enrolling infants, experiences of recruitment and suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSION Overall, the parents were positive about their baby taking part in the trial, but the consent process could be improved, by providing information about relevant trials earlier in the pregnancy or implementing continuous consent at key points in the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research; City University London; London UK
| | - Alexandra Sawyer
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research; City University London; London UK
| | | | - Heike Rabe
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School and University Hospitals; Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abhyankar P, Summers BA, Velikova G, Bekker HL. Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity. Med Decis Making 2014; 34:567-82. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x14529624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Health professionals must enable patients to make informed decisions about health care choices through unbiased presentation of all options. This study examined whether presenting the decision as “opportunity” rather than “choice” biased individuals’ preferences in the context of trial participation for cancer treatment. Methods. Self-selecting healthy women ( N = 124) were randomly assigned to the following decision frames: opportunity to take part in the trial (opt-in), opportunity to be removed from the trial (opt-out), and choice to have standard treatment or take part in the trial (choice). The computer-based task required women to make a hypothetical choice about a real-world cancer treatment trial. The software presented the framed scenario, recorded initial preference, presented comprehensive and balanced information, traced participants’ use of information during decision making, and recorded final decision. A posttask paper questionnaire assessed perceived risk, attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and satisfaction with decision. Results. Framing influenced women’s immediate preferences. Opportunity frames, whether opt-in or opt-out, introduced a bias as they discouraged women from choosing standard treatment. Using the choice frame avoided this bias. The opt-out opportunity frame also affected women’s perceived social norm; women felt that others endorsed the trial option. The framing bias was not present once participants had had the opportunity to view detailed information on the options within a patient decision aid format. There were no group differences in information acquisition and final decisions. Sixteen percent changed their initial preference after receiving full information. Conclusions. A “choice” frame, where all treatment options are explicit, is less likely to bias preferences. Presentation of full information in parallel, option-by-attribute format is likely to “de-bias” the decision frame. Tailoring of information to initial preferences would be ill-advised as preferences may change following detailed information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purva Abhyankar
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (PA)
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, UK (BAS)
- Leeds Institute for Molecular Medicine, St. James’s Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, UK (GV)
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (HLB)
| | - Barbara A. Summers
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (PA)
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, UK (BAS)
- Leeds Institute for Molecular Medicine, St. James’s Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, UK (GV)
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (HLB)
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (PA)
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, UK (BAS)
- Leeds Institute for Molecular Medicine, St. James’s Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, UK (GV)
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (HLB)
| | - Hilary L. Bekker
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (PA)
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, UK (BAS)
- Leeds Institute for Molecular Medicine, St. James’s Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, UK (GV)
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK (HLB)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kneipp SM, Lutz BJ, Levonian C, Cook C, Hamilton JB, Roberson D. Women's experiences in a community-based participatory research randomized controlled trial. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2013; 23:847-60. [PMID: 23567297 PMCID: PMC6545486 DOI: 10.1177/1049732313483924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Integrating community-based participatory research (CBPR) into traditional study designs can enhance outcomes in studies with disadvantaged groups. Little is known, however, about study participants' experiences with these approaches, the underlying processes involved in creating more positive outcomes, and whether undesirable effects on study outcomes occur simultaneously. We conducted focus group interviews with 31 disadvantaged women who participated in a CBPR-driven randomized controlled trial (RCT) both to explore their study experiences and to obtain their interpretations of select study findings. Using dimensional analysis, we found the tailored health questionnaire, treatment by study staff members, and RCT participants' understandings of and responses to randomization were salient to what women described as transformative experiences that occurred over the course of the RCT. These findings have implications for understanding how CBPR and non-CBPR aspects of interventions and study designs have the potential to affect both process and endpoint study outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn M Kneipp
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|