The experiences of midwives in integrated maternity care: A qualitative metasynthesis

Introducing waterbirth in a university hospital setting in Sweden: A qualitative study of midwives' experiences

INTRODUCTION

Waterbirth is a popular and increasing care option in several countries but is still debated. In Sweden, there are challenges in the process of reintroducing waterbirth after decades of interruption invoked by a dissuasion. The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting midwives' provision of waterbirth at a university birthing clinic in Sweden.

METHODS

A qualitative research design was used with three focus group interviews with 18 midwives at three birthing units. The data were analyzed using the principles of inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The midwives in the study expressed positive attitudes and potentiality about waterbirth, contributing to their desire to support physiological birth. However, obstacles were also disclosed, maiming waterbirth evolvement. Hence, two categories emerged, promoting factors and obstructing factors. The subcategories were: Provides a good experience whilst promoting physiological birth; Increased knowledge and information about waterbirth; Support from management; Updated guidelines; Ergonomic challenges; Lacking practical conditions; Lack of knowledge; Paradigm conflicts; and Limiting guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concluded that midwives recognized both promoting and obstructing factors affecting the provision of waterbirth. The predominant factor highlighted was the care-culture, with a clear distinction between a risk-focused, medicalized approach that inhibits waterbirth and a salutogenic perspective advocating for it. This dichotomy underscores the importance of providing opportunities that support women's choices to facilitate an empowering birth experience.

Travelling numbers and broken loops: A qualitative systematic review on collecting and reporting maternal and neonatal health data in low-and lower-middle income countries

Data and indicator estimates are considered vital to document persisting challenges in maternal and newborn health and track progress towards global goals. However, prioritization of standardised, comparable quantitative data can preclude the collection of locally relevant information and pose overwhelming burdens in low-resource settings, with negative effects on the provision of quality of care. A growing body of qualitative studies aims to provide a place-based understanding of the complex processes and human experiences behind the generation and use of maternal and neonatal health data. We conducted a qualitative systematic review exploring how national or international requirements to collect and report data on maternal and neonatal health indicators are perceived and experienced at the sub-national and country level in low-income and lower-middle income countries. We systematically searched six electronic databases for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published between January 2000 and March 2023. Following screening of 4084 records by four reviewers, 47 publications were included in the review. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised from a Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theoretical perspective. Our findings show maternal and neonatal health data and indicators are not fixed, neutral entities, but rather outcomes of complex processes. Their collection and uptake is influenced by a multitude of system hardware elements (human resources, relevancy and adequacy of tools, infrastructure, and interoperability) and software elements (incentive systems, supervision and feedback, power and social relations, and accountability). When these components are aligned and sufficiently supportive, data and indicators can be used for positive system adaptivity through performance evaluation, prioritization, learning, and advocacy. Yet shortcomings and broken loops between system components can lead to unforeseen emergent behaviors such as blame, fear, and data manipulation. This review highlights the importance of measurement approaches that prioritize local relevance and feasibility, necessitating participatory approaches to define context-specific measurement objectives and strategies.

Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital

Inspired by the six quality-of-care goals developed by the Institute of Medicine, woman-centred care (WCC) as model of care is used in maternity services as it gives an emphasis on the woman as an individual and not her status as a patient. Bringing stronger attention to women's needs and values, is proven to have clear benefits for perinatal outcomes, but fails to be known or recognised by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and implemented. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aimed to explore HCPs definitions of WCC and identify the degree of agreement and knowledge regarding perinatal indicators when a WCC model of care is implemented. The quantitative part was carried using a self-administered questionnaire with perinatal indicators identified from the literature. Semi-structured interviews were realized using a purposive sample of 15 HCPs and an interview grid inspired by Leap's WCC model. The study was conducted in the maternity of a university hospital in French-speaking part of Switzerland. Out of 318 HCPs working with mothers and their newborns, 51% had already heard of WCC without being familiar with Leap's model. The HCPs were aware of the positive perinatal care outcomes when WCC was implemented: women's satisfaction (99.2%), health promotion (97.6%), HCP's job satisfaction (93.2%) and positive feelings about their work (85.6%), which were strongly emphasised in the interviews. The respondents reported institutional difficulties in implementing the model such as administrative overload and lack of time. The positive outcomes of WCC on spontaneous deliveries and improved neonatal adaptation were known by most HCPs (63.4% and 59.9%, respectively). However, fewer than half of the HCPs highlighted the model's positive effects on analgesia and episiotomies or its financial benefits. Knowledge of quality-of-care outcomes (i.e women's satisfaction, positive impact on practice…) was prevalent among most of HCPs. Without adhering to a common definition and without a specific model for consensus, most providers have integrated some aspects of WCC into their practice. However, specific perinatal indicators remain largely unknown, which may hinder the implementation of WCC.

Assessment of interprofessional obstetric and midwifery care from the midwives' perspective using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS)

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration of physicians and midwives is essential for appropriate and safe care of pregnant and parturient women as well as their newborns. The complexity of woman-centered care settings requires the continuous exchange of information and the coordinated implementation of multi-and interprofessional care concepts. To analyze the midwives' perspective on the multi-and interprofessional care process during pregnancy, birth and postpartum period, we aimed to adapt and psychometrically evaluate the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS).

Methods

The ICS (13 items) was answered by 299 midwives for (i) prenatal and postpartum care as well as (ii) perinatal care. Three items on equitable communication (EC) identified in qualitative interviews with N = 6 midwives were added as further aspects of quality in collaborative midwifery care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test competing theoretically hypothesized factorial model structures, including both care settings simultaneously, i.e., birth and prenatal/postpartum.

Results

A two-dimensional structure assuming the 13 original ICS items and the 3 items on EC as psychometric distinct item groups accounts for the data best. After deleting 5 ICS items with insufficient indicator reliability, a very good-fitting model structure was obtained for both prenatal/postpartum as well as perinatal care: χ²_df = 192 = 226.35, p = 0.045, CFI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.025 (90%CI: [0.004; 0.037]). Both the reduced ICS-R and the EC scale (standardized response mean = 0.579/1.401) indicate significantly higher interprofessional collaboration in the birth setting. Responsibility in consulting, attitudes toward obstetric care and frequency of collaboration with other professional groups proved to be associated with the ICS-R and EC scale as expected.

Discussion

For the adapted ICS-R and the EC scale a good construct validity could be confirmed. Thus, the scales can be recommended as a promising assessment for recording the collaboration of midwives with physicians working in obstetric care from the perspective of midwives. The instrument provides a validated assessment basis in midwifery and obstetric care to identify potentially divergent perspectives within interprofessional care teams in woman's centered care.

Development and Validity of an Intrapartum Self-Assessment Scale Aimed at Instilling Midwife-Led Care Competencies Used at Freestanding Midwifery Units

Building experience in midwife-led care at freestanding midwifery units is needed to enhance assessment, technical, and care competencies specific to midwives. This study aimed to develop a self-assessment scale for midwifery practice competency based on the characteristics of midwife-led care practices in freestanding midwifery units. This study was conducted at 65 childbirth facilities in Japan between September 2017 and March 2018. The items on the scale were developed based on a literature review, discussion at a professional meeting, and a preliminary survey conducted at two timepoints. The validity and reproducibility of the scale were evaluated based on item analysis, compositional concept validity, internal consistency, stability, and criterion-related validity using data from 401 midwives. The final version of the scale consisted of 40 items. Cronbach's α for the overall scale was 0.982. The results for compositional concept validity, internal validity, and criterion-related validity demonstrated that this scale is capable of evaluating a midwife's practice competencies in intrapartum care. Repeated self-assessment using this scale could improve the competencies of midwives from an early stage, maximize the roles of physicians and midwives, and create an environment that provides high-quality assistance to women.

Transition From Pediatric and Adolescent HIV Care to Adult HIV Care and the Patient-Provider Relationship: A Qualitative Metasynthesis

ABSTRACT

Approximately 5 million adolescents (ages 15-24 years) living with HIV will transition to adult care in the next decade. Only half are engaged in care 12 months post-transition. This qualitative metasynthesis aimed to answer: What effect did the patient-provider relationship (PPR) have on adolescent living with HIV transition? What strategies were suggested to develop trusting relationships to promote engagement and retention in care? Primary qualitative studies from PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCO (January 2008 to December 2019) were identified. Data were analyzed using team-based thematic synthesis techniques and international standards. Fourteen articles with 478 participants from eight countries were included. Four themes emerged: the familial nature of the PPR, stigma as a bond and barrier, the provider knowing the patient and getting to know new providers, and recommendations supporting transition. The PPR is integral. Collaborative strategies used to build new relationships will support autonomy, decrease stigma, and facilitate trust.

The unheard parental cry of a stillbirth: fathers and mothers

PURPOSE

Our objective was to compare the prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and domestic violence among parents after a stillbirth vs. livebirths and assessing of the need for psychological and pharmacological interventions for the affected individuals.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care public sector hospital Northern India. 150 consecutive couples with a recent stillbirth (group 1) and 150 couples with a recent live birth (group 2) were enrolled. They were screened for depression (EPDS scale), anxiety (GAD-7), stress (PSS). Apriori sample size was calculated. Screen positive mothers and fathers were compared for the presence of depression, anxiety and stress, domestic violence, and need for treatment interventions.

RESULTS

Depression was higher in group 1 mothers (39.3 vs 14.0%, p < 0.001) as well as fathers (18.1 vs 6.7%, p value = 0.022). Anxiety and moderate to severe stress were also significantly higher in stillborn than liveborn groups respectively. Characteristics associated with higher risk are analyzed. Domestic violence was found in 6.7% in group 1 and 2.7% in group 2 mothers (p value 0.169). Pharmacotherapy and counselling were required by 11.3 and 18.0% in stillbirth versus 3.3 and 18.7% in livebirth group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Couples suffering stillbirths are at higher risk of depression, anxiety, and stress. We highlight this obstetrical public health issue, especially for the low middle income countries (LMIC) and advocate development of health policies for mental health screening of couples suffering stillbirths.

Characteristics of existing healthcare workforce education in spiritual care related to childbirth: A systematic review identifying only two studies

BACKGROUND

It has been argued that the beginning of life is one of the most significant, universally-shared life events, impacting parental health biologically, sociologically, psychologically and spiritually. In maternity care settings, only a few educational initiatives exist focusing on increasing competencies in spiritual care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics of content in existing under- and post-graduate education of healthcare professionals in spiritual care in the field of maternity care.

METHODS

We conducted an integrative review, searching seven databases for studies describing the content of existing education in spiritual care in maternity care settings.

RESULTS

From 235 studies assessed eligible and full text screened, only two were included, originating from the same project. The majority of existing studies about spiritual care focus on the perspective of women related to loss, sickness or bereavement, whereas research related to the field of maternity care is sparser. Furthermore, the perspective of the professional seems overlooked.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of research exploring the content and structure of educational initiatives related to spiritual care in maternity care. In order to strengthen spiritual care competencies in maternity care, for both women/partners and professionals, future research should investigate how education is planned and evaluated.

Evaluating the effect of an educational intervention on student midwife self-efficacy for their role as physiological childbirth advocates

INTRODUCTION

Midwifery education that strengthens self-efficacy can support student midwives in their role as advocates for a physiological approach to childbirth.

METHODS

To assess the effect of an educational intervention on self-efficacy, a pre- and post-intervention survey was administered to a control group and an intervention group of third year student midwives. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) was supplemented with midwifery-related self-efficacy questions related to behaviour in home and hospital settings, the communication of evidence, and ability to challenge practice.

RESULTS

Student midwives exposed to midwifery education designed to strengthen self-efficacy demonstrated significantly higher levels of general self-efficacy (p = .001) when contrasted to a control cohort. These students also showed significantly higher levels of self-efficacy in advocating for physiological childbirth (p = .029). There was a non-significant increase in self-efficacy in the hospital setting in the intervention group, a finding that suggests that education may ameliorate the effect of hospital settings on midwifery practice.

DISCUSSION

In spite of the small size of the study population, education that focuses on strengthening student midwife self-efficacy shows promise.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2020

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of diversity in the maternity care workforce and commentaries on reviews focused on burnout in midwifery and a cross-national comparison of guidelines for uncomplicated childbirth.