Use of corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Perspective from an Indian intensive care unit

Association between glucocorticoid administration and outcomes in patients with ARDS based on the MIMIC-III database

This study aimed to investigate the association between glucocorticoid administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with ARDS using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Data were collected from the MIMIC-III database, which consists of critically ill participants between 2001 and 2012 in the USA. A total of 1831 adult critically ill patients with ARDS were enrolled from the MIMIC-III database. The 60-day and in-hospital mortality, were the primary endpoints. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), 28-day ventilator-free days, ICU mortality, and 28-day mortality. A total of 1831 patients were included in the data analysis. After propensity score (PS) matching, 464 patients diagnosed with ARDS were matched between the glucocorticoid treatment and control groups. Glucocorticoids were associated with increased in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.32; 95% CI 1.01-1.71; P = .039], longer ICU stay [HR 2.25; 95% CI 0.84-3.65; P = .002], and shorter ventilation-free days at 28 days in all ARDS patients [HR -2.70; 95% CI -4.28--1.13; P = .001]. The 60-day mortality was higher in the glucocorticoid group (44.83% vs 35.34%; P = .154; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.93-1.66). Excluding the impact of the glucocorticoid initiation time, from day 15 to day 60, mortality was significantly higher in the glucocorticoid group compared to the non-glucocorticoid group (27.16% vs 12.70%; P < .001; HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.32-2.32). Glucocorticoid administration was associated with worse 60-day and in-hospital survival, longer ICU stay, and shorter ventilator-free days on day 28 in patients with ARDS. Our findings suggest careful consideration of glucocorticoids for ARDS.

Glucocorticoids for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are some of the most commonly used drugs for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the curative effect and side effects of glucocorticoids in treating patients with ARDS remain controversial.

METHODS

Three databases were searched until 2 July 2020, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared glucocorticoids versus other therapies in the treatment of ARDS were included in this meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 14 RCTs with 1362 ARDS patients were assessed. Overall, no statistically significant effect was found on mortality between the glucocorticoid group and the control group of ARDS patients. In the subgroup analysis, no benefit of glucocorticoids for ARDS on mortality was found in trials stratified according to low versus high risk of bias or with vs. without a loading dose. As for the dose and length of therapy, no statistically significant effect was found on mortality with high-dose, short-course glucocorticoid therapy. However, lower-dose and longer-course therapy with glucocorticoids was found to decrease the mortality of ARDS patients (lower dose: RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51-0.93, P = .02; longer-course therapy: RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37-0.99, P = .04). The TSA showed that more trials are needed to confirm the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer- and lower-dose glucocorticoid treatment may improve the prognosis of ARDS patients, but RCTs with higher quality and larger sample sizes are needed to further clarify the clinical effects of glucocorticoids on ARDS.

Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with hemodynamic compromise and end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac etiology. In addition to vasoactive medications, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices offer the ability to support the hemodynamics and prevent acute organ failure. Despite the wide array of available MCS devices for CS, there are limited data on the complications from these devices. In this review, we seek to summarize the complications of MCS devices in the contemporary era. Using a systems-based approach, this review covers domains of hematological, neurological, vascular, infectious, mechanical, and miscellaneous complications. These data are intended to provide a balanced narrative and aid in risk-benefit decision-making in this acutely ill population.

The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis continues to be a leading public health burden in the United States and worldwide. With the increasing use of advanced laboratory technology, there is a renewed interest in the use of biomarkers in sepsis to aid in more precise and targeted decision-making. Natriuretic peptides have been increasingly recognized to play a role outside of heart failure. They are commonly elevated among critically ill patients in the setting of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may play a role in identifying patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are limited data on the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, outcomes and prognosis of septic patients. This review seeks to describe the role of natriuretic peptides in fluid resuscitation, diagnosis of ventricular dysfunction and outcomes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) have been noted to be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. BNP/NT-proBNP may predict fluid responsiveness, and trends of these peptides may play a role in fluid resuscitation. Despite suggestions of a correlation with mortality, the role of BNP in mortality outcomes and prognosis during sepsis needs further evaluation.