Myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2A is essential for zebrafish posterior somite development

MOTS-c relieves hepatocellular carcinoma resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis under hypoxic conditions by activating MEF2A

BACKGROUND

Mitochondrial ORF of the 12S rRNA type-c (MOTS-c) as an AMPK agonist can regulate the expression of adaptive nuclear genes to promote cell homeostasis. However, the investigation of MOTS-c in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is insufficient. This study aims to reveal the role of MOTS-c on HCC cell apoptosis.

METHODS

Huh7 and HCCLM3 cells were incubated with MOTS-c under a hypoxic condition. MOTS-c levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the peripheral blood of HCC patients and healthy controls. Cell viability was detected by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cell apoptosis was investigated by flow cytometry and Tunel assay. Protein expression was detected by western blotting or immunohistochemistry assay. Dual-luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay were performed to identify the association among myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A), death receptor 4 (DR4) and DR5. A tumor-bearing nude mouse model was conducted to assess the effect of MOTS-c on HCC tumor formation in vivo.

RESULTS

MOTS-c levels in the peripheral blood of HCC patients were significantly lower compared to healthy individuals. MOTS-c promoted HCC cell apoptosis under hypoxia conditions. Hypoxia stimulation decreased the protein expression of MEF2A, DR4, DR5, fas-associating via death domain (FADD) and caspase-8, while these effects were attenuated after MOTS-c treatment. MOTS-c induced TRAIL-induced apoptosis of HCC cells by activating MEF2A through the phosphorylation of AMPK under hypoxia treatment. In addition, MEF2A transcriptionally up-regulated DR4 and DR5. MOTS-c activated MEF2A to regulate DR4 and DR5 expression, further mediating TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Further, MOTS-c treatment relieved hypoxia-induced tumor growth in vivo.

CONCLUSION

MOTS-c relieved hypoxia-induced HCC cell resistance to TRAIL-caused apoptosis by activating MEF2A.

Identification of two MEF2s and their role in inhibiting the transcription of the mstn2a gene in the yellowfin seabream, Acanthopagrus latus (Hottuyn, 1782)

Myocyte-specific enhancer binding factor 2 (MEF2), which belongs to the MADS superfamily, is a pivotal and conserved transcription factor that combines with the E-box motif to control the expression of muscle genes. Myostatin (mstn), a muscle growth inhibitor, is a vital member of the TGF-β superfamily. Currently, an understanding of the mechanisms of A. latus mstn (Almstn) transcriptional regulation mediated by MEF2 in fish muscle development is lacking. In the present study, two AlMEF2s (AlMEF2A and AlMEF2B) and Almstn2a were characterized from Acanthopagrus latus. AlMEF2A and AlMEF2B had 456 and 315 amino acid (aa) residues, respectively. Two typical regions, a MADS-box, MEF2, and transcriptionally activated (TAD) domains, are present in both AlMEF2s. The expression profiles of the two AlMEF2 genes were similar. The AlMEF2 genes were mainly expressed in the brain, white muscle, and liver, while Almstn2a expression was higher in the brain than in other tissues. Moreover, the expression trends of AlMEF2s and Almstn2a were significantly changed after starvation and refeeding in the five groups. Additionally, truncation experiments showed that -987 to +168 and -105 to +168 were core promoters of Almstn2a that responded to AlMEF2A and AlMEF2B, respectively. The point mutation experiment confirmed that Almstn2a transcription relies on the mutation binding sites 1 or 5 (M1/5) and mutation binding sites 4 or 5 (M4/5) for AlMEF2A and AlMEF2B regulation, respectively. The electrophoretic mobile shift assay (EMSA) further verified that M1 (-527 to -512) was a pivotal site where AlMEF2A acted on the Almstn2a gene. Furthermore, a siRNA interference gene expression experiment showed that reduced levels of AlMEF2A or AlMEF2B could prominently increase Almstn2a transcription. These results provide new information about the regulation of Almstn2a transcriptional activity by AlMEF2s and a theoretical basis for the regulatory mechanisms involved in muscle development in fish.

Common Carp mef2 Genes: Evolution and Expression

The MEF2 (myocyte enhancer factor 2) family belongs to the MADS-box superfamily of eukaryotic transcription factors. The vertebrate genes compose four distinct subfamilies designated MEF2A, -B, -C, and -D. There are multiple mef2 genes in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). So far, the embryonic expression patterns of these genes and the evolution of fish mef2 genes have been barely investigated. In this study, we completed the coding information of C. carpio mef2ca2 and mef2d1 genes via gene cloning and presented two mosaic mef2 sequences as evidence for recombination. We also analyzed the phylogenetic relationship and conserved synteny of mef2 genes and proposed a new evolutionary scenario. In our version, MEF2B and the other three vertebrate subfamilies were generated in parallel from the single last ancestor via two rounds of whole genome duplication events that occurred at the dawn of vertebrates. Moreover, we examined the expression patterns of C. carpio mef2 genes during embryogenesis, by using whole-mount in situ hybridization, and found the notochord to be a new expression site for these genes except for mef2ca1&2. Our results thus provide new insights into the evolution and expression of mef2 genes.

Mef2 and the skeletal muscle differentiation program

Mef2 is a conserved and significant transcription factor in the control of muscle gene expression. In cell culture Mef2 synergises with MyoD-family members in the activation of gene expression and in the conversion of fibroblasts into myoblasts. Amongst its in vivo roles, Mef2 is required for both Drosophila muscle development and mammalian muscle regeneration. Mef2 has functions in other cell-types too, but this review focuses on skeletal muscle and surveys key findings on Mef2 from its discovery, shortly after that of MyoD, up to the present day. In particular, in vivo functions, underpinning mechanisms and areas of uncertainty are highlighted. We describe how Mef2 sits at a nexus in the gene expression network that controls the muscle differentiation program, and how Mef2 activity must be regulated in time and space to orchestrate specific outputs within the different aspects of muscle development. A theme that emerges is that there is much to be learnt about the different Mef2 proteins (from different paralogous genes, spliced transcripts and species) and how the activity of these proteins is controlled.

Generation of a mef2aa:EGFP transgenic zebrafish line that expresses EGFP in muscle cells

Transgenesis is an important tool for exploring gene expression and function. The myocyte enhancer factor 2a (mef2a) gene encodes a member of the Mef2 protein family that is involved in vertebrate skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle development and differentiation during myogenesis. According to studies on human and animal models, mef2a is highly expressed in the heart and somites. To explore the potential of mef2a as a tool for selective labeling of muscle cells in living zebrafish embryos, we constructed a transgene mef2aa:EGFP to induce the expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of mef2a promoter. A ~2-kb DNA fragment, upstream of the translational start site of mef2aa, was identified to drive muscle-specific expression of EGFP in zebrafish embryos. Interestingly, the cranial muscles, abductor muscle, and adductor muscle were clearly labeled with EGFP in the established line Tg(mef2aa:EGFP) ^ntu803 . In addition, we showed that mef2aa mRNA was highly present in adult zebrafish heart, but not the skeleton muscle, whereas it was expressed in both embryonic heart and myotome, suggesting that mef2a is vital to the function of adult heart in vertebrates.

Cross-tissue and cross-species analysis of gene expression in skeletal muscle and electric organ of African weakly-electric fish (Teleostei; Mormyridae)

BACKGROUND

African weakly-electric fishes of the family Mormyridae are able to produce and perceive weak electric signals (typically less than one volt in amplitude) owing to the presence of a specialized, muscle-derived electric organ (EO) in their tail region. Such electric signals, also known as Electric Organ Discharges (EODs), are used for objects/prey localization, for the identification of conspecifics, and in social and reproductive behaviour. This feature might have promoted the adaptive radiation of this family by acting as an effective pre-zygotic isolation mechanism. Despite the physiological and evolutionary importance of this trait, the investigation of the genetic basis of its function and modification has so far remained limited. In this study, we aim at: i) identifying constitutive differences in terms of gene expression between electric organ and skeletal muscle (SM) in two mormyrid species of the genus Campylomormyrus: C. compressirostris and C. tshokwe, and ii) exploring cross-specific patterns of gene expression within the two tissues among C. compressirostris, C. tshokwe, and the outgroup species Gnathonemus petersii.

RESULTS

Twelve paired-end (100 bp) strand-specific RNA-seq Illumina libraries were sequenced, producing circa 330 M quality-filtered short read pairs. The obtained reads were assembled de novo into four reference transcriptomes. In silico cross-tissue DE-analysis allowed us to identify 271 shared differentially expressed genes between EO and SM in C. compressirostris and C.tshokwe. Many of these genes correspond to myogenic factors, ion channels and pumps, and genes involved in several metabolic pathways. Cross-species analysis has revealed that the electric organ transcriptome is more variable in terms of gene expression levels across species than the skeletal muscle transcriptome.

CONCLUSIONS

The data obtained indicate that: i) the loss of contractile activity and the decoupling of the excitation-contraction processes are reflected by the down-regulation of the corresponding genes in the electric organ's transcriptome; ii) the metabolic activity of the EO might be specialized towards the production and turn-over of membrane structures; iii) several ion channels are highly expressed in the EO in order to increase excitability; iv) several myogenic factors might be down-regulated by transcription repressors in the EO.

Differential expression of genes and proteins between electric organ and skeletal muscle in the mormyrid electric fish Brienomyrus brachyistius

Electric organs (EOs) have evolved independently in vertebrates six times from skeletal muscle (SM). The transcriptional changes accompanying this developmental transformation are not presently well understood. Mormyrids and gymnotiforms are two highly convergent groups of weakly electric fish that have independently evolved EOs: while much is known about development and gene expression in gymnotiforms, very little is known about development and gene expression in mormyrids. This lack of data limits prospects for comparative work. We report here on the characterization of 28 differentially expressed genes between SM and EO tissues in the mormyrid Brienomyrus brachyistius, which were identified using suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH). Forward and reverse SSH was performed on tissue samples of EO and SM resulting in one cDNA library enriched with mRNAs expressed in EO, and a second library representing mRNAs unique to SM. Nineteen expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were identified in EO and nine were identified in SM using BLAST searching of Danio rerio sequences available in NCBI databases. We confirmed differential expression of all 28 ESTs using RT-PCR. In EO, these ESTs represent four classes of proteins: (1) ion pumps, including the α- and β-subunits of Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase, and a plasma membrane Ca(2+)-ATPase; (2) Ca(2+)-binding protein S100, several parvalbumin paralogs, calcyclin-binding protein and neurogranin; (3) sarcomeric proteins troponin I, myosin heavy chain and actin-related protein complex subunit 3 (Arcp3); and (4) the transcription factors enhancer of rudimentary homolog (ERH) and myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A). Immunohistochemistry and western blotting were used to demonstrate the translation of seven proteins (myosin heavy chain, Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase, plasma membrane Ca(2+)-ATPase, MEF2, troponin and parvalbumin) and their cellular localization in EO and SM. Our findings suggest that mormyrids express several paralogs of muscle-specific genes and the proteins they encode in EOs, unlike gymnotiforms, which may post-transcriptionally repress several sarcomeric proteins. In spite of the similarity in the physiology and function of EOs in mormyrids and gymnotiforms, this study indicates that the mechanisms of development in the two groups may be considerably different.

Myogenesis and molecules - insights from zebrafish Danio rerio

Myogenesis is a fundamental process governing the formation of muscle in multicellular organisms. Recent studies in zebrafish Danio rerio have described the molecular events occurring during embryonic morphogenesis and have thus greatly clarified this process, helping to distinguish between the events that give rise to fast v. slow muscle. Coupled with the well-known Hedgehog signalling cascade and a wide variety of cellular processes during early development, the continual research on D. rerio slow muscle precursors has provided novel insights into their cellular behaviours in this organism. Similarly, analyses on fast muscle precursors have provided knowledge of the behaviour of a sub-set of epitheloid cells residing in the anterior domain of somites. Additionally, the findings by various groups on the roles of several molecules in somitic myogenesis have been clarified in the past year. In this study, the authors briefly review the current trends in the field of research of D. rerio trunk myogenesis.

Transcriptional features of genomic regulatory blocks

CAGE tag mapping of transcription start sites across different human tissues shows that genomic regulatory blocks have unique features that are the likely cause of their ability to respond to regulatory inputs from very long distances.

Background

Genomic regulatory blocks (GRBs) are chromosomal regions spanned by highly conserved non-coding elements (HCNEs), most of which serve as regulatory inputs of one target gene in the region. The target genes are most often transcription factors involved in embryonic development and differentiation. GRBs often contain extensive gene deserts, as well as additional 'bystander' genes intertwined with HCNEs but whose expression and function are unrelated to those of the target gene. The tight regulation of target genes, complex arrangement of regulatory inputs, and the differential responsiveness of genes in the region call for the examination of fundamental rules governing transcriptional activity in GRBs. Here we use extensive CAGE tag mapping of transcription start sites across different human tissues and differentiation stages combined with expression data and a number of sequence and epigenetic features to discover these rules and patterns.

Results

We show evidence that GRB target genes have properties that set them apart from their bystanders as well as other genes in the genome: longer CpG islands, a higher number and wider spacing of alternative transcription start sites, and a distinct composition of transcription factor binding sites in their core/proximal promoters. Target gene expression correlates with the acetylation state of HCNEs in the region. Additionally, target gene promoters have a distinct combination of activating and repressing histone modifications in mouse embryonic stem cell lines.

Conclusions

GRB targets are genes with a number of unique features that are the likely cause of their ability to respond to regulatory inputs from very long distances.

Dynamic gene expression in fish muscle during recovery growth induced by a fasting-refeeding schedule

BACKGROUND

Recovery growth is a phase of rapid growth that is triggered by adequate refeeding of animals following a period of weight loss caused by starvation. In this study, to obtain more information on the system-wide integration of recovery growth in muscle, we undertook a time-course analysis of transcript expression in trout subjected to a food deprivation-refeeding sequence. For this purpose complex targets produced from muscle of trout fasted for one month and from muscle of trout fasted for one month and then refed for 4, 7, 11 and 36 days were hybridized to cDNA microarrays containing 9023 clones.

RESULTS

Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) and temporal expression profiling led to the segregation of differentially expressed genes into four major clusters. One cluster comprising 1020 genes with high expression in muscle from fasted animals included a large set of genes involved in protein catabolism. A second cluster that included approximately 550 genes with transient induction 4 to 11 days post-refeeding was dominated by genes involved in transcription, ribosomal biogenesis, translation, chaperone activity, mitochondrial production of ATP and cell division. A third cluster that contained 480 genes that were up-regulated 7 to 36 days post-refeeding was enriched with genes involved in reticulum and Golgi dynamics and with genes indicative of myofiber and muscle remodelling such as genes encoding sarcomeric proteins and matrix compounds. Finally, a fourth cluster of 200 genes overexpressed only in 36-day refed trout muscle contained genes with function in carbohydrate metabolism and lipid biosynthesis. Remarkably, among the genes induced were several transcriptional regulators which might be important for the gene-specific transcriptional adaptations that underlie muscle recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first demonstration of a coordinated expression of functionally related genes during muscle recovery growth. Furthermore, the generation of a useful database of novel genes associated with muscle recovery growth will allow further investigations on particular genes, pathways or cellular process involved in muscle growth and regeneration.

Mef2s are required for thick filament formation in nascent muscle fibres

During skeletal muscle differentiation, the actomyosin motor is assembled into myofibrils, multiprotein machines that generate and transmit force to cell ends. How expression of muscle proteins is coordinated to build the myofibril is unknown. Here we show that zebrafish Mef2d and Mef2c proteins are required redundantly for assembly of myosin-containing thick filaments in nascent muscle fibres, but not for the earlier steps of skeletal muscle fibre differentiation, elongation, fusion or thin filament gene expression. mef2d mRNA and protein is present in myoblasts, whereas mef2c expression commences in muscle fibres. Knockdown of both Mef2s with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides or in mutant fish blocks muscle function and prevents sarcomere assembly. Cell transplantation and heat-shock-driven rescue reveal a cell-autonomous requirement for Mef2 within fibres. In nascent fibres, Mef2 drives expression of genes encoding thick, but not thin, filament proteins. Among genes analysed, myosin heavy and light chains and myosin-binding protein C require Mef2 for normal expression, whereas actin, tropomyosin and troponin do not. Our findings show that Mef2 controls skeletal muscle formation after terminal differentiation and define a new maturation step in vertebrate skeletal muscle development at which thick filament gene expression is controlled.