Down-modulation of the CXCR4 co-receptor by intracellular expression of a single chain variable fragment (SFv) inhibits HIV-1 entry into primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells and post-mitotic neurons

Crucial Role of Central Nervous System as a Viral Anatomical Compartment for HIV-1 Infection

The chronic infection established by the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) produces serious CD4+ T cell immunodeficiency despite the decrease in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels and the raised life expectancy of people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) through treatment with combined antiretroviral therapies (cART). HIV-1 enters the central nervous system (CNS), where perivascular macrophages and microglia are infected. Serious neurodegenerative symptoms related to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are produced by infection of the CNS. Despite advances in the treatment of this infection, HAND significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality globally. The pathogenesis and the role of inflammation in HAND are still incompletely understood. Principally, growing evidence shows that the CNS is an anatomical reservoir for viral infection and replication, and that its compartmentalization can trigger the evolution of neurological damage and thus make virus eradication more difficult. In this review, important concepts for understanding HAND and neuropathogenesis as well as the viral proteins involved in the CNS as an anatomical reservoir for HIV infection are discussed. In addition, an overview of the recent advancements towards therapeutic strategies for the treatment of HAND is presented. Further neurological research is needed to address neurodegenerative difficulties in people living with HIV, specifically regarding CNS viral reservoirs and their effects on eradication.

Important role of microglia in HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders and the molecular pathways implicated in its pathogenesis

The development of effective combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART) led to a significant reduction in the death rate associated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. However, recent studies indicate that considerably more than 50% of all HIV-1 infected patients develop HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). Microglia are the foremost cells infected by HIV-1 in the central nervous system (CNS), and so, are also likely to contribute to the neurotoxicity observed in HAND. The activation of microglia induces the release of pro-inflammatory markers and altered secretion of cytokines, chemokines, secondary messengers, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) which activate signalling pathways that initiate neuroinflammation. In turn, ROS and inflammation also play critical roles in HAND. However, more efforts are required to understand the physiology of microglia and the processes involved in their activation in order to better understand the how HIV-1-infected microglia are involved in the development of HAND. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about the involvement of oxidative stress mechanisms and role of HIV-induced ROS in the development of HAND. We also examine the academic literature regarding crucial HIV-1 pathogenicity factors implicated in neurotoxicity and inflammation in order to identify molecular pathways that could serve as potential therapeutic targets for treatment of this disease. KEY MESSAGES Neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity mechanisms are crucial in the pathogenesis of HAND. CNS infiltration by HIV-1 and immune cells through the blood brain barrier is a key process involved in the pathogenicity of HAND. Factors including calcium dysregulation and autophagy are the main challenges involved in HAND.

Applying Antibodies Inside Cells: Principles and Recent Advances in Neurobiology, Virology and Oncology

To interfere with cell function, many scientists rely on methods that target DNA or RNA due to the ease with which they can be applied. Proteins are usually the final executors of function but are targeted only indirectly by these methods. Recent advances in targeted degradation of proteins based on proteolysis-targeting chimaeras (PROTACs), ubiquibodies, deGradFP (degrade Green Fluorescent Protein) and other approaches have demonstrated the potential of interfering directly at the protein level for research and therapy. Proteins can be targeted directly and very specifically by antibodies, but using antibodies inside cells has so far been considered to be challenging. However, it is possible to deliver antibodies or other proteins into the cytosol using standard laboratory equipment. Physical methods such as electroporation have been demonstrated to be efficient and validated thoroughly over time. The expression of intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) inside cells is another way to interfere with intracellular targets at the protein level. Methodological strategies to target the inside of cells with antibodies, including delivered antibodies and expressed antibodies, as well as applications in the research areas of neurobiology, viral infections and oncology, are reviewed here. Antibodies have already been used to interfere with a wide range of intracellular targets. Disease-related targets included proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (α-synuclein), Alzheimer's disease (amyloid-β) or Huntington's disease (mutant huntingtin [mHtt]). The applications of intrabodies in the context of viral infections include targeting proteins associated with HIV (e.g. HIV1-TAT, Rev, Vif, gp41, gp120, gp160) and different oncoviruses such as human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Epstein-Barr virus, and they have been used to interfere with various targets related to different processes in cancer, including oncogenic pathways, proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, metastasis, angiogenesis or neo-antigens (e.g. p53, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 [HER2], signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 [STAT3], RAS-related RHO-GTPase B (RHOB), cortactin, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR2], Ras, Bcr-Abl). Interfering at the protein level allows questions to be addressed that may remain unanswered using alternative methods. This review addresses why direct targeting of proteins allows unique insights, what is currently feasible in vitro, and how this relates to potential therapeutic applications.

Specific in vivo knockdown of protein function by intrabodies

Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) are recombinant antibody fragments that bind to target proteins expressed inside of the same living cell producing the antibodies. The molecules are commonly used to study the function of the target proteins (i.e., their antigens). The intrabody technology is an attractive alternative to the generation of gene-targeted knockout animals, and complements knockdown techniques such as RNAi, miRNA and small molecule inhibitors, by-passing various limitations and disadvantages of these methods. The advantages of intrabodies include very high specificity for the target, the possibility to knock down several protein isoforms by one intrabody and targeting of specific splice variants or even post-translational modifications. Different types of intrabodies must be designed to target proteins at different locations, typically either in the cytoplasm, in the nucleus or in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Most straightforward is the use of intrabodies retained in the ER (ER intrabodies) to knock down the function of proteins passing the ER, which disturbs the function of members of the membrane or plasma proteomes. More effort is needed to functionally knock down cytoplasmic or nuclear proteins because in this case antibodies need to provide an inhibitory effect and must be able to fold in the reducing milieu of the cytoplasm. In this review, we present a broad overview of intrabody technology, as well as applications both of ER and cytoplasmic intrabodies, which have yielded valuable insights in the biology of many targets relevant for drug development, including α-synuclein, TAU, BCR-ABL, ErbB-2, EGFR, HIV gp120, CCR5, IL-2, IL-6, β-amyloid protein and p75NTR. Strategies for the generation of intrabodies and various designs of their applications are also reviewed.

Neuronal toxicity in HIV CNS disease

HIV enters the brain during the early stages of initial infection and can result in a complicated array of diverse neurological dysfunctions. While neuronal injury and loss are at the heart of neurological decline and HIV-associated neuropathology, HIV does not productively infect neurons and the effects of HIV on neurons may be described as largely indirect. Viral proteins released from infected cells in the CNS are a well-characterized source of neuronal toxicity. Likewise, host-derived inflammatory cytokines and chemokines released from infected and/or activated glial cells can damage neurons, as well. Newly identified host-virus interactions and the current state of our knowledge regarding HIV-associated neuronal toxicity will be addressed in this review. Aspects of HIV-associated neurotoxic mechanisms, patterns of neuronal damage, viral effects on neurotrophic signaling, clade variations and comorbid substance abuse will be discussed. Recent advances in our understanding of the impact of HIV infection of the CNS on neuronal dysfunction and cell death will also be highlighted.

Could differential virological characteristics account for ongoing viral replication and insidious damage of the brain during HIV 1 infection of the central nervous system?

Neurocognitive disorders due to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have been reported in 25-60% of cases,(1-3) despite a sustained viral response in peripheral blood while on highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). A possible reason may be that the central nervous system (CNS) is less accessible for anti-retroviral agents, therefore this sanctuary site can provide a reservoir for ongoing HIV-1 replication. Mutations conferring resistance to anti-retroviral drugs may predominate in compartments where drug levels are suboptimal. This review provides an overview on the literature regarding the development of resistance mutations and the sensitivity for co-receptors in CNS. Mutations caused by the anti-retroviral drugs with the lowest intracerebral penetration would be expected to be found in higher percentages in the CNS than in the periphery of the human body. However, few studies have been performed that can confirm or reject this claim. Zidovudine, the anti-retroviral drug with the best intracerebral penetration, has been studied to some extent. This drug indeed induces resistance mutations in blood as well as the CNS. HAART induces a switch from HIV that uses co-receptor CRR5 to HIV that uses co-receptor CXCR4. This switch may appear later in the CNS compartment compared to the periphery. However, current literature shows conflicting evidence. In conclusion, the current understanding of HIV-strain evolution under drug pressure in sanctuary sites like CNS is incomplete. Therefore, more research is needed in order to establish the role of these sites in the development of drug resistant mutants under adequate HAART.

Augmented chemokine levels and chemokine receptor expression on immune cells during pulmonary tuberculosis

The systemic changes in immune mediators such as cytokine and chemokines, and their synchronized interaction that regulates the cell trafficking during Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection, were studied. Cytokines and chemokines were evaluated by cytometric bead array (CBA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 34 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients and 30 healthy subjects. The expression of chemokine receptors was assessed by flow cytometry. A significant increase in IP-10, MIG, interleukin-8, RANTES, and interleukin-6 levels was found, whereas a decrease in interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and transforming growth factor-beta was observed during PTB. Significant correlation within chemokines and between cytokines was observed in PTB. All immune cells except monocytes and B cells expressed significantly higher levels of CCR1, CCR2, and CXCR2 whereas CCR7 expression was upregulated only on monocytes and neutrophils in PTB. Both T and B cells expressed significantly high levels of CXCR3 which also correlated well with the chemokine levels in PTB. Thus, it was found that chemokines function coordinately and consistently during PTB. This balanced chemokine and cytokine relationship at the periphery may aid in amplified effector immune cell trafficking and retarded monocyte migration through differential chemokine receptor expression.

Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) and their therapeutic potential

Combining exquisite specificity and high antigen-binding affinity, intrabodies have been used as a biotechnological tool to interrupt, modulate, or define the functions of a wide range of target antigens at the posttranslational level. An intrabody is an antibody that has been designed to be expressed intracellularly and can be directed to a specific target antigen present in various subcellular locations including the cytosol, nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, peroxisomes, plasma membrane and trans-Golgi network (TGN) through in frame fusion with intracellular trafficking/localization peptide sequences. Although intrabodies can be expressed in different forms, the most commonly used format is a singlechain antibody (scFv Ab) created by joining the antigen-binding variable domains of heavy and light chain with an interchain linker (ICL), most often the 15 amino acid linker (GGGGS)(3) between the variable heavy (VH) and variable light (VL) chains. Intrabodies have been used in research of cancer, HIV, autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative disease, and transplantation. Clinical application of intrabodies has mainly been hindered by the availability of robust gene delivery system(s) including target cell directed gene delivery. This review will discuss several methods of intrabody selection, different strategies of cellular targeting, and recent successful examples of intrabody applications. Taking advantage of the high specificity and affinity of an antibody for its antigen, and of the virtually unlimited diversity of antigen-binding variable domains available for molecular targeting, intrabody techniques are emerging as promising tools to generate phenotypic knockouts, to manipulate biological processes, and to obtain a more thorough understanding of functional genomics.

Blocking translocation of cell surface molecules from the ER to the cell surface by intracellular antibodies targeted to the ER

Intracellular antibodies (intrabodies) constitute a potent tool to neutralize the function of target proteins inside specific cell compartments (cytosol, nucleus, mitochondria and ER). The intrabody technology is an attractive alternative to the generation of gene-targeted knockout animals and complements or replaces knockdown techniques such as antisense-RNA, RNAi and RNA aptamers. This article focuses on intrabodies targeted to the ER. Intracellular anti-bodies expressed and retained inside the ER (ER intrabodies) are shown to be highly efficient in blocking the translocation of secreted and cell surface molecules from the ER to the cell surface.The advantage of ER intrabodies over cytoplasmic intrabodies is that they are correctly folded and easier to select. A particular advantage of the intrabody technology over existing ones is the possibility of inhibiting selectively post-translational modifications of proteins.The main applications of ER intrabodies so far have been (i) inactivation of oncogenic receptors and (ii) functional inhibition of virus envelope proteins and virus-receptor molecules on the surface of host cells.In cancer research, the number of in vivo mouse models for evaluation of the therapeutic potential of intrabodies is increasing.In the future, endosomal localized receptors involved in bacterial and viral infections, intracellular oncogenic receptors and enzymes involved in glycosylation of tumour antigens might be new targets for ER intrabodies.