The switch from client holding to folding in the Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone machineries is regulated by a direct interplay between co-chaperones

Mechanism of client loading from BiP to Grp94 and its disruption by select inhibitors

Hsp90 chaperones are a long-standing cancer drug target with numerous ATP-competitive inhibitors in clinical trials. Client proteins are transferred from Hsp70 to Hsp90 in a stepwise process of client delivery, loading, and trapping, but little is known about how inhibitors influence these steps. By examining the ER-resident BiP/Grp94 system (Hsp70/Hsp90 paralogs), we discover that some inhibitors allow BiP to push Grp94 into the client loading conformation, whereas other inhibitors block this conformational change and destabilize a BiP/client/Grp94 ternary complex. We uncover how BiP drives Grp94 into the client loading state and identify a structural explanation for why only a select group of inhibitors disrupt client loading on Grp94. These results show a client loading mechanism with specific shared features between the Hsp70/Hsp90 systems in the ER and cytosol and open a new avenue for rational Hsp90 drug design.

Chaperone-dependent and chaperone-independent functions of carboxylate clamp tetratricopeptide repeat (CC-TPR) proteins

The molecular chaperones HSP70 and HSP90 play key roles in proteostasis by acting as adapters; they bind to a 'client' protein, often with the assistance of cochaperones, and then recruit additional cochaperones that promote specific fates (e.g., folding or degradation). One family of cochaperones contains a region termed the tetratricopeptide repeat with carboxylate clamps (CC-TPRs) domain. These domains bind to an EEVD motif at the C-termini of cytoplasmic HSP70 and HSP90 proteins, bringing them into proximity to chaperone-bound clients. It has recently become clear that CC-TPR proteins also bind to 'EEVD-like' motifs in non-chaperone proteins, circumventing the need for HSP70s or HSP90s. We provide an overview of the chaperone-dependent and -independent roles of CC-TPR proteins and discuss how, together, they shape proteostasis.

Hsp90: Bringing it all together

Heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is an ancient and multifaceted protein-folding machine essential for most organisms. The past 40 years have uncovered remarkable complexity in the regulation and function of Hsp90, which dwarfs most other machines in the cell in sophistication. Here, we propose four analogies to illustrate Hsp90's sophistication: a multifunctional Swiss Army knife, an automobile engine and its controls, a switchboard acting as a hub and directing signals, and an orchestra conductor setting the tempo of a symphony. Although each of these analogies represents some key Hsp90 activities, none of them captures the entirety of Hsp90's complexity. Together, these roles enable Hsp90 to support both homeostasis and differentiation, both cellular stability and adaptability. At the 11th International Conference on the Hsp90 Chaperone Machine, the consensus was that to understand this major guardian of proteostasis, we need to study how the many facets of Hsp90's function influence each other. We hope that these analogies will help to conceptually integrate the many roles of Hsp90 in proteostasis and help the field develop the practical applications of Hsp90 modulators.

The known unknowns of the Hsp90 chaperone

Molecular chaperones are vital proteins that maintain protein homeostasis by assisting in protein folding, activation, degradation, and stress protection. Among them, heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) stands out as an essential proteostasis hub in eukaryotes, chaperoning hundreds of 'clients' (substrates). After decades of research, several 'known unknowns' about the molecular function of Hsp90 remain unanswered, hampering rational drug design for the treatment of cancers, neurodegenerative, and other diseases. We highlight three fundamental open questions, reviewing the current state of the field for each, and discuss new opportunities, including single-molecule technologies, to answer the known unknowns of the Hsp90 chaperone.

Stress-inducible phosphoprotein 1 (Sti1/Stip1/Hop) sequesters misfolded proteins during stress

Co-chaperones are key elements of cellular protein quality control. They cooperate with the major heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp90 in folding proteins and preventing the toxic accumulation of misfolded proteins upon exposure to stress. Hsp90 interacts with the co-chaperone stress-inducible phosphoprotein 1 (Sti1/Stip1/Hop) and activator of Hsp90 ATPase protein 1 (Aha1) among many others. Sti1 and Aha1 control the ATPase activity of Hsp90, but Sti1 also facilitates the transfer of client proteins from Hsp70 to Hsp90, thus connecting these two major branches of protein quality control. We find that misbalanced expression of Sti1 and Aha1 in yeast and mammalian cells causes severe growth defects. Also, deletion of STI1 causes an accumulation of soluble misfolded ubiquitinated proteins and a strong activation of the heat shock response. We discover that, during proteostatic stress, Sti1 forms cytoplasmic inclusions in yeast and mammalian cells that overlap with misfolded proteins. Our work indicates a key role of Sti1 in proteostasis independent of its Hsp90 ATPase regulatory functions by sequestering misfolded proteins during stress.

Targeting chaperone modifications: Innovative approaches to cancer treatment

Cancer and other chronic diseases are marked by alterations in the protein quality control system, affecting the posttranslational destiny of various proteins that regulate, structure, and catalyze cellular processes. Cellular chaperones, also known as heat shock proteins (HSPs), are pivotal in this system, performing protein triage that often determines the fate of proteins they bind to. Grasping the regulatory mechanisms of HSPs and their associated cofactors is crucial for understanding protein quality control in both healthy and diseased states. Recent research has shed light on the interactions within the protein quality control system and how post-translational modification govern protein interactions, function, and localization, which can drive or inhibit cell proliferation. This body of work encompasses critical elements of the heat shock response, including heat shock protein 70, heat shock protein 90, carboxyl-terminus of HSC70 interacting protein, and heat shock protein organizing protein. This review aims to synthesize these advancements, offering a holistic understanding of the system and its response when commandeered by diseases like cancer. We focus on the mechanistic shift in co-chaperone engagement-transitioning from heat shock protein organizing protein to carboxyl-terminus of HSC70 interacting protein in association with heat shock protein 70 and heat shock protein 90-which could influence cellular growth and survival pathways. A comprehensive examination of posttranslational modification-driven regulation within the protein quality control network is presented, highlighting the roles of activation factors, chaperones, and co-chaperones. Our insights aim to inform new strategies for therapeutically targeting diseases by considering the entire heat shock response system.

The role of the co-chaperone HOP in plant homeostasis during development and stress

Proteins need to acquire their native structure in order to become fully functional. In specific cases, the active conformation is obtained spontaneously; nevertheless, many proteins need the assistance of chaperones and co-chaperones to be properly folded. These proteins help to maintain protein homeostasis under control conditions and under different stresses. HOP (HSP70-HSP90 organizing protein) is a highly conserved family of co-chaperones that assist HSP70 and HSP90 in the folding of specific proteins. In the last few years, findings in mammals and yeast have revealed novel functions of HOP and re-defined the role of HOP in protein folding. Here, we provide an overview of the most important aspects of HOP regulation and function in other eukaryotes and analyse whether these aspects are conserved in plants. In addition, we highlight the HOP clients described in plants and the role of HOP in plant development and stress response.

The human testis-enriched HSPA2 interacts with HIF-1α in epidermal keratinocytes, yet HIF-1α stability and HIF-1-dependent gene expression rely on the HSPA (HSP70) activity

The Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) is essential for cellular adaptation to reduced oxygen levels. It also facilitates the maintenance and re-establishment of skin homeostasis. Among others, it is involved in regulating keratinocyte differentiation. The stability of the oxygen-liable HIF-1α subunit is regulated by various non-canonical oxygen-independent mechanisms, which among others involve Heat Shock Proteins of the A family (HSPA/HSP70). This group of highly homologous chaperones and proteostasis-controlling factors includes HSPA2, a unique member crucial for spermatogenesis and implicated in the regulation of keratinocyte differentiation. HIF-1 can control the HSPA2 gene expression. In this study, we revealed that HIF-1α is the first confirmed client of HSPA2 in human somatic cells. It colocalises and interacts directly with HSPA2 in the epidermis in situ and immortalised keratinocytes in vitro. Using an in vitro model based on HSPA2-overexpressing and HSPA2-deficient variants of immortalised keratinocytes we showed that changes in HSPA2 levels do not affect the levels and intracellular localisation of HIF-1α or influence the ability of HIF-1 to modulate target gene expression. However, HIF-1α stability in keratinocytes appears critically reliant on HSPAs as a group of functionally overlapping chaperones. In addition to HSPA2, HIF-1α colocalises and forms complexes with HSPA8 and HSPA1, representing housekeeping and stress-inducible HSPA family paralogs, respectively. Chemical inhibition of HSPA activity, but not paralog-specific knockdown of HSPA8 or HSPA1 expression reduced HIF-1α levels and HIF-1-dependent gene expression. These observations suggest that pharmacological targeting of HSPAs could prevent excessive HIF-1 signalling in pathological skin conditions.

Structural transitions modulate the chaperone activities of Grp94

Hsp90s are ATP-dependent chaperones that collaborate with co-chaperones and Hsp70s to remodel client proteins. Grp94 is the ER Hsp90 homolog essential for folding multiple secretory and membrane proteins. Grp94 interacts with the ER Hsp70, BiP, although the collaboration of the ER chaperones in protein remodeling is not well understood. Grp94 undergoes large-scale conformational changes that are coupled to chaperone activity. Within Grp94, a region called the pre-N domain suppresses ATP hydrolysis and conformational transitions to the active chaperone conformation. In this work, we combined in vivo and in vitro functional assays and structural studies to characterize the chaperone mechanism of Grp94. We show that Grp94 directly collaborates with the BiP chaperone system to fold clients. Grp94's pre-N domain is not necessary for Grp94-client interactions. The folding of some Grp94 clients does not require direct interactions between Grp94 and BiP in vivo, suggesting that the canonical collaboration may not be a general chaperone mechanism for Grp94. The BiP co-chaperone DnaJB11 promotes the interaction between Grp94 and BiP, relieving the pre-N domain suppression of Grp94's ATP hydrolysis activity. In structural studies, we find that ATP binding by Grp94 alters the ATP lid conformation, while BiP binding stabilizes a partially closed Grp94 intermediate. Together, BiP and ATP push Grp94 into the active closed conformation for client folding. We also find that nucleotide binding reduces Grp94's affinity for clients, which is important for productive client folding. Alteration of client affinity by nucleotide binding may be a conserved chaperone mechanism for a subset of ER chaperones.

Tandem repeats of highly bioluminescent NanoLuc are refolded noncanonically by the Hsp70 machinery

Chaperones are a large family of proteins crucial for maintaining cellular protein homeostasis. One such chaperone is the 70 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70), which plays a crucial role in protein (re)folding, stability, functionality, and translocation. While the key events in the Hsp70 chaperone cycle are well established, a relatively small number of distinct substrates were repetitively investigated. This is despite Hsp70 engaging with a plethora of cellular proteins of various structural properties and folding pathways. Here we analyzed novel Hsp70 substrates, based on tandem repeats of NanoLuc (Nluc), a small and highly bioluminescent protein with unique structural characteristics. In previous mechanical unfolding and refolding studies, we have identified interesting misfolding propensities of these Nluc-based tandem repeats. In this study, we further investigate these properties through in vitro bulk experiments. Similar to monomeric Nluc, engineered Nluc dyads and triads proved to be highly bioluminescent. Using the bioluminescence signal as the proxy for their structural integrity, we determined that heat-denatured Nluc dyads and triads can be efficiently refolded by the E. coli Hsp70 chaperone system, which comprises DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. In contrast to previous studies with other substrates, we observed that Nluc repeats can be efficiently refolded by DnaK and DnaJ, even in the absence of GrpE co-chaperone. Taken together, our study offers a new powerful substrate for chaperone research and raises intriguing questions about the Hsp70 mechanisms, particularly in the context of structurally diverse proteins.

Molecular mechanisms of chaperone-directed protein folding: Insights from atomistic simulations

Molecular chaperones, a family of proteins of which Hsp90 and Hsp70 are integral members, form an essential machinery to maintain healthy proteomes by controlling the folding and activation of a plethora of substrate client proteins. This is achieved through cycles in which Hsp90 and Hsp70, regulated by task-specific co-chaperones, process ATP and become part of a complex network that undergoes extensive compositional and conformational variations. Despite impressive advances in structural knowledge, the mechanisms that regulate the dynamics of functional assemblies, their response to nucleotides, and their relevance for client remodeling are still elusive. Here, we focus on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR):Hsp90:Hsp70:co-chaperone Hop client-loading and the GR:Hsp90:co-chaperone p23 client-maturation complexes, key assemblies in the folding cycle of glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a client strictly dependent upon Hsp90/Hsp70 for activity. Using a combination of molecular dynamics simulation approaches, we unveil with unprecedented detail the mechanisms that underpin function in these chaperone machineries. Specifically, we dissect the processes by which the nucleotide-encoded message is relayed to the client and how the distinct partners of the assemblies cooperate to (pre)organize partially folded GR during Loading and Maturation. We show how different ligand states determine distinct dynamic profiles for the functional interfaces defining the interactions in the complexes and modulate their overall flexibility to facilitate progress along the chaperone cycle. Finally, we also show that the GR regions engaged by the chaperone machinery display peculiar energetic signatures in the folded state, which enhance the probability of partial unfolding fluctuations. From these results, we propose a model where a dynamic cross-talk emerges between the chaperone dynamics states and remodeling of client-interacting regions. This factor, coupled to the highly dynamic nature of the assemblies and the conformational heterogeneity of their interactions, provides the basis for regulating the functions of distinct assemblies during the chaperoning cycle.

The transportosome system as a model for the retrotransport of soluble proteins

The classic model of action of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) sustains that its associated heat-shock protein of 90-kDa (HSP90) favours the cytoplasmic retention of the unliganded GR, whereas the binding of steroid triggers the dissociation of HSP90 allowing the passive nuclear accumulation of GR. In recent years, it was described a molecular machinery called transportosome that is responsible for the active retrograde transport of GR. The transportosome heterocomplex includes a dimer of HSP90, the stabilizer co-chaperone p23, and FKBP52 (FK506-binding protein of 52-kDa), an immunophilin that binds dynein/dynactin motor proteins. The model shows that upon steroid binding, FKBP52 is recruited to the GR allowing its active retrograde transport on cytoskeletal tracks. Then, the entire GR heterocomplex translocates through the nuclear pore complex. The HSP90-based heterocomplex is released in the nucleoplasm followed by receptor dimerization. Subsequent findings demonstrated that the transportosome is also responsible for the retrotransport of other soluble proteins. Importantly, the disruption of this molecular oligomer leads to several diseases. In this article, we discuss the relevance of this transport machinery in health and disease.

Protein quality control: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic intervention-EMBO workshop, May 21-26 2023, Srebreno, Croatia

Protein quality control pathways ensure a functional proteome and rely on a complex proteostasis network (PN) that is composed of molecular chaperones and proteases. Failures in the PN can lead to a broad spectrum of diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and a range of motor neuron diseases. The EMBO workshop "Protein quality control: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic intervention" covered all aspects of protein quality control from underlying molecular mechanisms of chaperones and proteases to stress signaling pathways and medical implications. This report summarizes the workshop and highlights selected presentations.

Phosphorylation of the Hsp90 Co-Chaperone Hop Changes its Conformational Dynamics and Biological Function

The molecular chaperones Hsp90 and Hsp70 and their regulatory co-chaperone Hop play a key role at the crossroads of the folding pathways of numerous client proteins by forming fine-tuned multiprotein complexes. Alterations of the biomolecules involved may functionally impact the chaperone machinery: here, we integrate simulations and experiments to unveil how Hop conformational fitness and interactions can be controlled by the perturbation of just one residue. Specifically, we unveil how mechanisms mediated by Hop residue Y354 control Hop open and closed states, which affect binding of Hsp70/Hsp90. Phosphorylation or mutation of Hop-Y354 are shown to favor structural ensembles that are indeed not optimal for stable interactions with Hsp90 and Hsp70. This disfavors cellular accumulation of the stringent Hsp90 clients glucocorticoid receptor and the viral tyrosine kinase v-Src, with detrimental effects on v-Src activity. Our results show how the post-translational modification of a specific residue in Hop provides a regulation mechanism for the larger chaperone complex of which it is part. In this framework, the effects of one single alteration are amplified at the cellular level through the perturbation of protein-interaction networks.

CHIP: A Co-chaperone for Degradation by the Proteasome and Lysosome

Protein homeostasis relies on a balance between protein folding and protein degradation. Molecular chaperones like Hsp70 and Hsp90 fulfill well-defined roles in protein folding and conformational stability via ATP-dependent reaction cycles. These folding cycles are controlled by associations with a cohort of non-client protein co-chaperones, such as Hop, p23, and Aha1. Pro-folding co-chaperones facilitate the transit of the client protein through the chaperone-mediated folding process. However, chaperones are also involved in proteasomal and lysosomal degradation of client proteins. Like folding complexes, the ability of chaperones to mediate protein degradation is regulated by co-chaperones, such as the C-terminal Hsp70-binding protein (CHIP/STUB1). CHIP binds to Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones through its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain and functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase using a modified RING finger domain (U-box). This unique combination of domains effectively allows CHIP to network chaperone complexes to the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagosome-lysosome systems. This chapter reviews the current understanding of CHIP as a co-chaperone that switches Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone complexes from protein folding to protein degradation.

Combination of AURKA inhibitor and HSP90 inhibitor to treat breast cancer with AURKA overexpression and TP53 mutations

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Researches show that Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is highly expressed in approximately 73% of breast cancer patients, which induces drug resistance in breast cancer patients and decreases the median survival time. AURKA regulates spindle assembly, centrosome maturation, and chromosome alignment. AURKA overexpression affects the occurrence and development of breast cancer. Besides AURKA overexpression, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) maintains the survival and proliferation of tumor cells by stabilizing the structure of oncoproteins, including P53 mutants (mtP53). TP53 mutations accounted for approximately 13%, 40%, 80%, 33%, 71%, and 82% of luminal A, Luminal B, Luminal C, normal basal-like, HER2-amplified, and basal-like breast cancers, respectively. TP53 mutation can aggravate cell genome instability and enhance the invasion, migration, and resistance of cancer cell. This review describes the research status of AURKA and HSP90 in breast cancer, summarizes the structure, function, and the chaperone cycle of HSP90, elaborates the interrelation between HSP90, mtP53, P53, and AURKA, and proposes the combination of HSP90 inhibitor and AURKA inhibitor to treat breast cancer. Targeting AURKA and HSP90 to treat cancer with AURKA overexpression and TP53 mutations will help improve the specificity and efficiency of breast cancer treatment and solve the problem of drug resistance.

Hsp90 and Associated Co-Chaperones of the Malaria Parasite

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is one of the major guardians of cellular protein homeostasis, through its specialized molecular chaperone properties. While Hsp90 has been extensively studied in many prokaryotic and higher eukaryotic model organisms, its structural, functional, and biological properties in parasitic protozoans are less well defined. Hsp90 collaborates with a wide range of co-chaperones that fine-tune its protein folding pathway. Co-chaperones play many roles in the regulation of Hsp90, including selective targeting of client proteins, and the modulation of its ATPase activity, conformational changes, and post-translational modifications. Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for the most lethal form of human malaria. The survival of the malaria parasite inside the host and the vector depends on the action of molecular chaperones. The major cytosolic P. falciparum Hsp90 (PfHsp90) is known to play an essential role in the development of the parasite, particularly during the intra-erythrocytic stage in the human host. Although PfHsp90 shares significant sequence and structural similarity with human Hsp90, it has several major structural and functional differences. Furthermore, its co-chaperone network appears to be substantially different to that of the human host, with the potential absence of a key homolog. Indeed, PfHsp90 and its interface with co-chaperones represent potential drug targets for antimalarial drug discovery. In this review, we critically summarize the current understanding of the properties of Hsp90, and the associated co-chaperones of the malaria parasite.

Emerging Link between Tsc1 and FNIP Co-Chaperones of Hsp90 and Cancer

Heat shock protein-90 (Hsp90) is an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone that is tightly regulated by a group of proteins termed co-chaperones. This chaperone system is essential for the stabilization and activation of many key signaling proteins. Recent identification of the co-chaperones FNIP1, FNIP2, and Tsc1 has broadened the spectrum of Hsp90 regulators. These new co-chaperones mediate the stability of critical tumor suppressors FLCN and Tsc2 as well as the various classes of Hsp90 kinase and non-kinase clients. Many early observations of the roles of FNIP1, FNIP2, and Tsc1 suggested functions independent of FLCN and Tsc2 but have not been fully delineated. Given the broad cellular impact of Hsp90-dependent signaling, it is possible to explain the cellular activities of these new co-chaperones by their influence on Hsp90 function. Here, we review the literature on FNIP1, FNIP2, and Tsc1 as co-chaperones and discuss the potential downstream impact of this regulation on normal cellular function and in human diseases.

There are more Hsp90 chaperone mechanisms in heaven and earth, dear reader, than are dreamt of in your philosophy

Dahiya et al. (2022) and Biebl et al. (2022) present mechanistic insights into the Hsp40/Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone teamwork and the co-chaperones that participate in this network.

Stress-inducible phosphoprotein 1 (HOP/STI1/STIP1) regulates the accumulation and toxicity of α-synuclein in vivo

The predominantly pre-synaptic intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein is prone to misfolding and aggregation in synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Molecular chaperones play important roles in protein misfolding diseases and members of the chaperone machinery are often deposited in Lewy bodies. Here, we show that the Hsp90 co-chaperone STI1 co-immunoprecipitated α-synuclein, and co-deposited with Hsp90 and Hsp70 in insoluble protein fractions in two mouse models of α-synuclein misfolding. STI1 and Hsp90 also co-localized extensively with filamentous S129 phosphorylated α-synuclein in ubiquitin-positive inclusions. In PD human brains, STI1 transcripts were increased, and in neurologically healthy brains, STI1 and α-synuclein transcripts correlated. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analyses revealed direct interaction of α-synuclein with STI1 and indicated that the STI1 TPR2A, but not TPR1 or TPR2B domains, interacted with the C-terminal domain of α-synuclein. In vitro, the STI1 TPR2A domain facilitated S129 phosphorylation by Polo-like kinase 3. Moreover, mice over-expressing STI1 and Hsp90ß presented elevated α-synuclein S129 phosphorylation accompanied by inclusions when injected with α-synuclein pre-formed fibrils. In contrast, reduced STI1 function decreased protein inclusion formation, S129 α-synuclein phosphorylation, while mitigating motor and cognitive deficits as well as mesoscopic brain atrophy in α-synuclein-over-expressing mice. Our findings reveal a vicious cycle in which STI1 facilitates the generation and accumulation of toxic α-synuclein conformers, while α-synuclein-induced proteostatic stress increased insoluble STI1 and Hsp90.