A direct interaction between CPF and RNA Pol II links RNA 3' end processing to transcription

PP1/PNUTS phosphatase binds the restrictor complex and stimulates RNA Pol II transcription termination

The restrictor ZC3H4/WDR82 terminates antisense transcription from bidirectional promoters, but its mechanism is poorly understood. We report that ZC3H4/WDR82 immunoprecipitates with PP1 phosphatase and its nuclear targeting subunit, PP1 phosphatase nuclear targeting subunit (PNUTS), which binds to WDR82. AlphaFold predicts a complex of PP1/PNUTS with the restrictor where both PNUTS and ZC3H4 contact WDR82. A substrate trap, PP1H66K-PNUTS, comprising inactive PP1 fused to the PNUTS C terminus, antagonizes restrictor-mediated termination, whereas PP1WT-PNUTS has less of an effect, suggesting that phosphatase activity is required for termination. One PP1/PNUTS substrate implicated in termination by the restrictor is RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) CTD Ser5-P. PP1H66K-PNUTS induces Ser5-P hyperphosphorylation at 5' ends, presumably by inhibiting dephosphorylation. NET-seq analysis suggests that CTD Ser5 dephosphorylation would promote termination by increasing RNA Pol II pausing. Both inhibition of termination and CTD hyperphosphorylation require the WDR82 binding domain of PP1H66K-PNUTS, which mediates restrictor binding. In summary, the PP1/PNUTS phosphatase associated with the restrictor via WDR82 promotes efficient transcription termination.

Combining cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with orthogonal solution state methods to define the molecular basis of the phosphoprotein phosphatase family regulation and substrate specificity

Protein phosphatases are dynamic enzymes that exhibit complex regulatory mechanisms, with disruptions in these regulatory processes associated with disease. It is now clear that many phosphatases assemble into large macromolecular complexes via the interaction of phosphatase-specific regulatory proteins and substrates containing short linear motifs (SLiMs) or short helical motifs (SHelMs). Here, we review how cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) integrated with orthogonal methods to study dynamic protein-protein interactions (NMR spectroscopy, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, among others) is leading to new discoveries about the mechanisms controlling phosphatase assembly, substrate recruitment and dephosphorylation and, in turn, are providing novel strategies for targeting phosphatase-related diseases. This review focuses on the recently determined structures and regulation of the phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) family of ser/thr phosphatases-PP1, PP2A, Calcineurin and PP5.

CTDP1 and RPB7 stabilize Pol II and permit reinitiation

The mechanisms governing the termination and subsequent reinitiation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) remain poorly understood. Here we find that depletion of RPB7 leads to the destabilization of Pol II's largest subunit, RPB1. This destabilization is influenced by the loop regions of RPB7, CDK9, the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RPB1, and its linker region. The stabilization process of RPB1 is regulated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin 3. Additionally, RPB7 interacts with the phosphatase CTDP1, which is crucial for maintaining RPB1 stability. RPB7 is also vital for the reinitiation of Pol II, engages with RNA processing factors, and is localized to the RNA exit channel of the Pol II complex. The absence of RPB7 compromises RNA processing. We propose that RPB7 recruits CTDP1 to dephosphorylate Pol II, enhancing its stability and facilitating efficient reinitiation, adding an emerging dimension to transcriptional regulation.

Defining gene ends: RNA polymerase II CTD threonine 4 phosphorylation marks transcription termination regions genome-wide

Defining the beginning of a eukaryotic protein-coding gene is relatively simple. It corresponds to the first ribonucleotide incorporated by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) into the nascent RNA molecule. This nucleotide is protected by capping and maintained in the mature messenger RNA (mRNA). However, in higher eukaryotes, the end of mRNA is separated from the sites of transcription termination by hundreds to thousands of base pairs. Currently used genomic annotations only take account of the end of the mature transcript - the sites where pre-mRNA cleavage occurs, while the regions in which transcription terminates are unannotated. Here, we describe the evidence for a marker of transcription termination, which could be widely applicable in genomic studies. Pol II termination regions can be determined genome-wide by detecting Pol II phosphorylated on threonine 4 of its C-terminal domain (Pol II CTD-T4ph). Pol II in this state pauses before leaving the DNA template. Up to date this potent mark has been underused because the evidence for its place and role in termination is scattered across multiple publications. We summarize the observations regarding Pol II CTD-T4ph in termination regions and present bioinformatic analyses that further support Pol II CTD-T4ph as a global termination mark in animals.

The PNUTS phosphatase complex controls transcription pause release

Gene expression is regulated by controlling distinct steps of the transcriptional cycle, including initiation, pausing, elongation, and termination. Kinases phosphorylate RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) and associated factors to control transitions between these steps and to act as central gene regulatory nodes. Similarly, phosphatases that dephosphorylate these components are emerging as important regulators of transcription, although their roles remain less well understood. Here, we discover that the mouse PNUTS-PP1 phosphatase complex plays an essential role in controlling transcription pause release in addition to its previously described function in transcription termination. Transcription pause release by the PNUTS complex is essential for almost all RNA Pol II-dependent gene transcription, relies on its PP1 phosphatase subunit, and controls the phosphorylation of factors required for pause release and elongation. Together, these observations reveal an essential new role for a phosphatase complex in transcription pause release and show that the PNUTS complex is essential for RNA Pol II-dependent transcription.

Emerging and re-emerging themes in co-transcriptional pre-mRNA splicing

Proper gene expression requires the collaborative effort of multiple macromolecular machines to produce functional messenger RNA. As RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) transcribes DNA, the nascent pre-messenger RNA is heavily modified by other complexes such as 5' capping enzymes, the spliceosome, the cleavage, and polyadenylation machinery as well as RNA-modifying/editing enzymes. Recent evidence has demonstrated that pre-mRNA splicing and 3' end cleavage can occur on similar timescales as transcription and significantly cross-regulate. In this review, we discuss recent advances in co-transcriptional processing and how it contributes to gene regulation. We highlight how emerging areas-including coordinated splicing events, physical interactions between the RNA synthesis and modifying machinery, rapid and delayed splicing, and nuclear organization-impact mRNA isoforms. Coordination among RNA-processing choices yields radically different mRNA and protein products, foreshadowing the likely regulatory importance of co-transcriptional RNA folding and co-transcriptional modifications that have yet to be characterized in detail.

The general transcription factors (GTFs) of RNA polymerase II and their roles in plant development and stress responses

In eukaryotes, general transcription factors (GTFs) enable recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) to core promoters to facilitate initiation of transcription. Extensive research in mammals and yeast has unveiled their significance in basal transcription as well as in diverse biological processes. Unlike mammals and yeast, plant GTFs exhibit remarkable degree of variability and flexibility. This is because plant GTFs and GTF subunits are often encoded by multigene families, introducing complexity to transcriptional regulation at both cellular and biological levels. This review provides insights into the general transcription mechanism, GTF composition, and their cellular functions. It further highlights the involvement of RNA Pol II-related GTFs in plant development and stress responses. Studies reveal that GTFs act as important regulators of gene expression in specific developmental processes and help equip plants with resilience against adverse environmental conditions. Their functions may be direct or mediated through their cofactor nature. The versatility of GTFs in controlling gene expression, and thereby influencing specific traits, adds to the intricate complexity inherent in the plant system.

DEAD-box ATPase Dbp2 is the key enzyme in an mRNP assembly checkpoint at the 3'-end of genes and involved in the recycling of cleavage factors

mRNA biogenesis in the eukaryotic nucleus is a highly complex process. The numerous RNA processing steps are tightly coordinated to ensure that only fully processed transcripts are released from chromatin for export from the nucleus. Here, we present the hypothesis that fission yeast Dbp2, a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) remodelling ATPase of the DEAD-box family, is the key enzyme in an RNP assembly checkpoint at the 3'-end of genes. We show that Dbp2 interacts with the cleavage and polyadenylation complex (CPAC) and localises to cleavage bodies, which are enriched for 3'-end processing factors and proteins involved in nuclear RNA surveillance. Upon loss of Dbp2, 3'-processed, polyadenylated RNAs accumulate on chromatin and in cleavage bodies, and CPAC components are depleted from the soluble pool. Under these conditions, cells display an increased likelihood to skip polyadenylation sites and a delayed transcription termination, suggesting that levels of free CPAC components are insufficient to maintain normal levels of 3'-end processing. Our data support a model in which Dbp2 is the active component of an mRNP remodelling checkpoint that licenses RNA export and is coupled to CPAC release.

Neuronal RNA processing: cross-talk between transcriptional regulation and RNA-binding proteins

In the nervous system, alternative RNA processing is particularly prevalent, which results in the expression of thousands of transcript variants found in no other tissue. Neuron-specific RNA-binding proteins co-transcriptionally regulate alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation, and RNA editing, thereby shaping the RNA identity of nervous system cells. Recent evidence suggests that interactions between RNA-binding proteins and cis-regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers play a role in the determination of neuron-specific expression profiles. Here, we discuss possible mechanisms through which transcription and RNA processing cross-talk to generate the uniquely complex neuronal transcriptome, with a focus on alternative 3'-end formation.

Co-transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes

Many steps of RNA processing occur during transcription by RNA polymerases. Co-transcriptional activities are deemed commonplace in prokaryotes, in which the lack of membrane barriers allows mixing of all gene expression steps, from transcription to translation. In the past decade, an extraordinary level of coordination between transcription and RNA processing has emerged in eukaryotes. In this Review, we discuss recent developments in our understanding of co-transcriptional gene regulation in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, comparing methodologies and mechanisms, and highlight striking parallels in how RNA polymerases interact with the machineries that act on nascent RNA. The development of RNA sequencing and imaging techniques that detect transient transcription and RNA processing intermediates has facilitated discoveries of transcription coordination with splicing, 3'-end cleavage and dynamic RNA folding and revealed physical contacts between processing machineries and RNA polymerases. Such studies indicate that intron retention in a given nascent transcript can prevent 3'-end cleavage and cause transcriptional readthrough, which is a hallmark of eukaryotic cellular stress responses. We also discuss how coordination between nascent RNA biogenesis and transcription drives fundamental aspects of gene expression in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

A CPF-like phosphatase module links transcription termination to chromatin silencing

The interconnections between co-transcriptional regulation, chromatin environment, and transcriptional output remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the mechanism underlying RNA 3' processing-mediated Polycomb silencing of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). We show a requirement for ANTHESIS PROMOTING FACTOR 1 (APRF1), a homolog of yeast Swd2 and human WDR82, known to regulate RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) during transcription termination. APRF1 interacts with TYPE ONE SERINE/THREONINE PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 4 (TOPP4) (yeast Glc7/human PP1) and LUMINIDEPENDENS (LD), the latter showing structural features found in Ref2/PNUTS, all components of the yeast and human phosphatase module of the CPF 3' end-processing machinery. LD has been shown to co-associate in vivo with the histone H3 K4 demethylase FLOWERING LOCUS D (FLD). This work shows how the APRF1/LD-mediated polyadenylation/termination process influences subsequent rounds of transcription by changing the local chromatin environment at FLC.

DDX21 mediates co-transcriptional RNA m6A modification to promote transcription termination and genome stability

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a crucial RNA modification that regulates diverse biological processes in human cells, but its co-transcriptional deposition and functions remain poorly understood. Here, we identified the RNA helicase DDX21 with a previously unrecognized role in directing m6A modification on nascent RNA for co-transcriptional regulation. DDX21 interacts with METTL3 for co-recruitment to chromatin through its recognition of R-loops, which can be formed co-transcriptionally as nascent transcripts hybridize onto the template DNA strand. Moreover, DDX21's helicase activity is needed for METTL3-mediated m6A deposition onto nascent RNA following recruitment. At transcription termination regions, this nexus of actions promotes XRN2-mediated termination of RNAPII transcription. Disruption of any of these steps, including the loss of DDX21, METTL3, or their enzymatic activities, leads to defective termination that can induce DNA damage. Therefore, we propose that the R-loop-DDX21-METTL3 nexus forges the missing link for co-transcriptional modification of m6A, coordinating transcription termination and genome stability.

Structural basis of exoribonuclease-mediated mRNA transcription termination

Efficient termination is required for robust gene transcription. Eukaryotic organisms use a conserved exoribonuclease-mediated mechanism to terminate the mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II)1-5. Here we report two cryogenic electron microscopy structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II pre-termination transcription complexes bound to the 5'-to-3' exoribonuclease Rat1 and its partner Rai1. Our structures show that Rat1 displaces the elongation factor Spt5 to dock at the Pol II stalk domain. Rat1 shields the RNA exit channel of Pol II, guides the nascent RNA towards its active centre and stacks three nucleotides at the 5' terminus of the nascent RNA. The structures further show that Rat1 rotates towards Pol II as it shortens RNA. Our results provide the structural mechanism for the Rat1-mediated termination of mRNA transcription by Pol II in yeast and the exoribonuclease-mediated termination of mRNA transcription in other eukaryotes.

Nucleotide-level linkage of transcriptional elongation and polyadenylation

Alternative polyadenylation yields many mRNA isoforms whose 3' termini occur disproportionately in clusters within 3' untranslated regions. Previously, we showed that profiles of poly(A) site usage are regulated by the rate of transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase (Pol) II (Geisberg et al., 2020). Pol II derivatives with slow elongation rates confer an upstream-shifted poly(A) profile, whereas fast Pol II strains confer a downstream-shifted poly(A) profile. Within yeast isoform clusters, these shifts occur steadily from one isoform to the next across nucleotide distances. In contrast, the shift between clusters - from the last isoform of one cluster to the first isoform of the next - is much less pronounced, even over large distances. GC content in a region 13-30 nt downstream from isoform clusters correlates with their sensitivity to Pol II elongation rate. In human cells, the upstream shift caused by a slow Pol II mutant also occurs continuously at single nucleotide resolution within clusters but not between them. Pol II occupancy increases just downstream of poly(A) sites, suggesting a linkage between reduced elongation rate and cluster formation. These observations suggest that (1) Pol II elongation speed affects the nucleotide-level dwell time allowing polyadenylation to occur, (2) poly(A) site clusters are linked to the local elongation rate, and hence do not arise simply by intrinsically imprecise cleavage and polyadenylation of the RNA substrate, (3) DNA sequence elements can affect Pol II elongation and poly(A) profiles, and (4) the cleavage/polyadenylation and Pol II elongation complexes are spatially, and perhaps physically, coupled so that polyadenylation occurs rapidly upon emergence of the nascent RNA from the Pol II elongation complex.