Repair of replication-dependent double-strand breaks differs between the leading and lagging strands

DNA repair and the contribution to chemotherapy resistance

The DNA damage response comprises a set of imperfect pathways that maintain cell survival following exposure to DNA damaging agents. Cancers frequently exhibit DNA repair pathway alterations that contribute to their intrinsic genome instability. This, in part, facilitates a therapeutic window for many chemotherapeutic agents whose mechanisms of action often converge at the generation of a double-strand DNA break. The development of therapy resistance occurs through countless molecular mechanisms that promote tolerance to DNA damage, often by preventing break formation or increasing repair capacity. This review broadly discusses the DNA damaging mechanisms of action for different classes of chemotherapeutics, how avoidance and repair of double-strand breaks can promote resistance, and strategic directions for counteracting therapy resistance.

Multigenerational cell tracking of DNA replication and heritable DNA damage

Cell heterogeneity is a universal feature of life. Although biological processes affected by cell-to-cell variation are manifold, from developmental plasticity to tumour heterogeneity and differential drug responses, the sources of cell heterogeneity remain largely unclear1,2. Mutational and epigenetic signatures from cancer (epi)genomics are powerful for deducing processes that shaped cancer genome evolution3-5. However, retrospective analyses face difficulties in resolving how cellular heterogeneity emerges and is propagated to subsequent cell generations. Here, we used multigenerational single-cell tracking based on endogenously labelled proteins and custom-designed computational tools to elucidate how oncogenic perturbations induce sister cell asymmetry and phenotypic heterogeneity. Dual CRISPR-based genome editing enabled simultaneous tracking of DNA replication patterns and heritable endogenous DNA lesions. Cell lineage trees of up to four generations were tracked in asynchronously growing cells, and time-resolved lineage analyses were combined with end-point measurements of cell cycle and DNA damage markers through iterative staining. Besides revealing replication and repair dynamics, damage inheritance and emergence of sister cell heterogeneity across multiple cell generations, through combination with single-cell transcriptomics, we delineate how common oncogenic events trigger multiple routes towards polyploidization with distinct outcomes for genome integrity. Our study provides a framework to dissect phenotypic plasticity at the single-cell level and sheds light onto cellular processes that may resemble early events during cancer development.

Cas12h is a crRNA-guided DNA nickase that can be utilized for precise gene editing

Type V-H CRISPR-Cas system, an important subtype of type V CRISPR-Cas systems, has remained enigmatic in terms of its structure and function despite being discovered several years ago. Here, we comprehensively characterize the type V-H CRISPR-Cas system and elucidate its role as a DNA nicking system. The unique CRISPR RNA (crRNA) employed by Cas12h effector protein enables specific targeting of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), while its RuvC domain is responsible for cleaving the non-target strand (NTS) of dsDNA. We present the structure of Cas12h bound to crRNA and target DNA. Our structural analysis reveals that the RuvC domain possesses a narrow active pocket that facilitates recognition of NTS but potentially hinders access to the target strand. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Cas12h confers adaptive immunity against invading mobile genetic elements through transcriptional gene inhibition. We have engineered an adenine base editor by fusing Cas12h with an adenine deaminase, achieving effective A-to-G substitution.

Strategic targeting of Cas9 nickase expands tandem gene arrays

Expanding tandem gene arrays facilitates adaptation through dosage effects and gene family formation via sequence diversification. However, experimental induction of such expansions remains challenging. Here, we introduce a method termed break-induced replication (BIR)-mediated tandem repeat expansion (BITREx) to address this challenge. BITREx places Cas9 nickase adjacent to a tandem gene array to break the replication fork that has just replicated the array, forming a single-ended double-strand break. This break is subsequently end-resected to become single stranded. Since there is no repeat unit downstream of the break, the single-stranded DNA often invades an upstream unit to initiate ectopic BIR, resulting in array expansion. BITREx has successfully expanded gene arrays in budding yeast, with the CUP1 array reaching ∼1 Mb. Furthermore, appropriate splint DNAs allow BITREx to generate tandem arrays de novo from single-copy genes. We have also demonstrated BITREx in mammalian cells. Therefore, BITREx will find various unique applications in genome engineering.

A Rfa1-MN-based system reveals new factors involved in the rescue of broken replication forks

The integrity of the replication forks is essential for an accurate and timely completion of genome duplication. However, little is known about how cells deal with broken replication forks. We have generated in yeast a system based on a chimera of the largest subunit of the ssDNA binding complex RPA fused to the micrococcal nuclease (Rfa1-MN) to induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) at replication forks and searched for mutants affected in their repair. Our results show that the core homologous recombination (HR) proteins involved in the formation of the ssDNA/Rad51 filament are essential for the repair of DSBs at forks, whereas non-homologous end joining plays no role. Apart from the endonucleases Mus81 and Yen1, the repair process employs fork-associated HR factors, break-induced replication (BIR)-associated factors and replisome components involved in sister chromatid cohesion and fork stability, pointing to replication fork restart by BIR followed by fork restoration. Notably, we also found factors controlling the length of G1, suggesting that a minimal number of active origins facilitates the repair by converging forks. Our study has also revealed a requirement for checkpoint functions, including the synthesis of Dun1-mediated dNTPs. Finally, our screening revealed minimal impact from the loss of chromatin factors, suggesting that the partially disassembled nucleosome structure at the replication fork facilitates the accessibility of the repair machinery. In conclusion, this study provides an overview of the factors and mechanisms that cooperate to repair broken forks.

Transcription near arrested DNA replication forks triggers ribosomal DNA copy number changes

DNA copy number changes via chromosomal rearrangements or the production of extrachromosomal circular DNA. Here, we demonstrate that the histone deacetylase Sir2 maintains the copy number of budding yeast ribosomal RNA gene [ribosomal DNA (rDNA)] by suppressing end resection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) formed upon DNA replication fork arrest in the rDNA and their subsequent homologous recombination (HR)-mediated rDNA copy number changes during DSB repair. Sir2 represses transcription from the regulatory promoter E-pro located near the fork arresting site. When Sir2 is absent, this transcription is stimulated but terminated by arrested replication forks. This transcription-replication collision induces DSB formation, DSB end resection and the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex-dependent DSB repair that is prone to chromosomal rDNA copy number changes and the production of extrachromosomal rDNA circles. Therefore, repression of transcription near arrested replication forks is critical for the maintenance of rDNA stability by directing DSB repair into the HR-independent, rearrangement-free pathway.