Setting up Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment Services: Questions and Answers

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Nonepileptic Events

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a guide for neurologists managing nonepileptic events (NEEs), a complex intersection of neurology and psychiatry. It covers risk factors, pathophysiology, current treatment approaches, and prognosis, with specific management strategies for challenging scenarios such as patients with intellectual disabilities and comorbid epilepsy.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

An emphasis on strong communication and coordinated care among health care specialists improves patient outcomes and reduces unnecessary medical consultations and procedures. This approach is now recognized as essential for addressing the complex presentation and comorbidities associated with NEEs.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

NEEs are prevalent and highly disabling, and multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms for these events have been proposed. Mortality is comparable with that of patients with treatment-refractory epilepsy, and prognosis is better for children than adults. Achievable treatment goals for adults include improved quality of life and reduced frequency and severity of events, even if complete remission of NEEs is not achieved. Enhanced communication and coordinated care through multidisciplinary care teams enable the efficient use of individual expertise at different treatment stages to address the presentation, risk factors, and comorbidities associated with NEEs, resulting in a better quality of life for patients.

Iatrogenic harm in functional neurological disorder

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is continuing to gain increasing recognition globally as a valid and potentially treatable disorder. Iatrogenic harm towards patients with FND is significant, however, and has been around for centuries. Despite advances in our understanding around the aetiology, pathophysiology and treatment of FND, many aspects of such harm continue to persist. Avoidance of iatrogenic harm has been highlighted by clinicians as one of the most important therapeutic considerations in FND; however, the sources and range of potential harms, or indeed ways to mitigate them, have not previously been summarized. Using a combination of clinical and research experience and scoping review methodology, this review aims to describe the main sources of iatrogenic harm towards patients with FND, including harm from misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis and treatment, direct harm from professional interactions, other stigma-related harms, harm related to diagnostic overshadowing and over-diagnosis of FND. We also describe some potential ways to address and prevent such harms, such as ways to reduce misdiagnosis with a focus on rule in signs, optimizing teaching and communication, ensuring parity of FND with other medical conditions and continued integration of patient and professional organizations.

Functional neurological disorder in Europe: regional differences in education and health policy

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common cause of neurological disability. Despite recent advances in pathophysiological understanding and treatments, application of this knowledge to clinical practice is variable and limited.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to provide an expert overview of the state of affairs of FND practice across Europe, focusing on education and training, access to specialized care, reimbursement and disability policies, and academic and patient-led representation of people with FND.

METHODS

We conducted a survey across Europe, featuring one expert per country. We asked experts to compare training and services for people with FND to those provided to people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

RESULTS

Responses from 25 countries revealed that only five included FND as a mandatory part of neurological training, while teaching about MS was uniformly included. FND was part of final neurology examinations in 3/17 countries, unlike MS that was included in all 17. Seventeen countries reported neurologists with an interest in FND but the estimated mean ratio of FND-interested neurologists to MS neurologists was 1:20. FND coding varied, with psychiatric coding for FND impacting treatment access and disability benefits in the majority of countries. Twenty countries reported services refusing to see FND patients. Eight countries reported an FND special interest group or network; 11 reported patient-led organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

FND is largely a marginal topic within European neurology training and there is limited access to specialized care and disability benefits for people with FND across Europe. We discuss how this issue can be addressed at an academic, healthcare and patient organization level.

BOLD signal variability as potential new biomarker of functional neurological disorders

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common neuropsychiatric condition with established diagnostic criteria and effective treatments but for which the underlying neuropathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed FND as a multi-network brain disorder, unveiling alterations across limbic, self-agency, attentional/salience, and sensorimotor networks. However, the relationship between identified brain alterations and disease progression or improvement is less explored.

METHODS

This study included resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 79 patients with FND and 74 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). First, voxel-wise BOLD signal variability was computed for each participant and the group-wise difference was calculated. Second, we investigated the potential of BOLD signal variability to serve as a prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome in 47 patients who attended a follow-up measurement after eight months.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated higher BOLD signal variability in key networks, including the somatomotor, salience, limbic, and dorsal attention networks, in patients compared to controls. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in BOLD signal variability in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in FND patients who had an improved clinical outcome, suggesting SMA variability as a potential state biomarker. Additionally, higher BOLD signal variability in the left insula at baseline predicted a worse clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the understanding of FND pathophysiology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of neural activity and highlighting the potential of BOLD signal variability as a valuable research tool. The insula and SMA emerge as promising regions for further investigation as prognostic and state markers.

Illness perception in functional neurological disorder: low illness coherence and personal control

Introduction

Illness perception refers to patients' subjective representations and appraisals of somatic and mental symptoms. These are relevant for self-management and outcome. In clinical practice, patients with functional neurological disorder (FND) often encounter a fragmented biomedical attitude, which leaves them without clear concepts. In this context, illness perception is relevant.

Methods

Illness perception was assessed in FND patients and compared with samples of psychosomatic patients (PSM) as well as poststroke patients (STR). The three samples (FND, n=87; PSM, n=97 and STR, n=92) were almost all in inpatient treatment or rehabilitation. Illness perception was assessed with the revised German version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). For assessments of correlations, depressive symptoms were tested with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, dissociative and functional neurological symptoms by the German adaption of the Dissociative Experiences Scale and biopsychosocial complexity by the INTERMED Self-Assessment questionnaire.

Results

Apart from the chronicity subscale, all dimensions of the IPQ-R differed between groups. FND patients perceived lower illness coherence and personal control than both other groups and attributed their illness more to chance than to behavioural risk factors. PSM patients had the strongest emotional representations. There were only few correlations with dissociative scores and biopsychosocial complexity.

Conclusion

Illness perception is an important issue in patients with FND with particular emphasis on low illness coherence and personal control. Missing associations with biopsychosocial complexity suggest that subjective illness perception is an important complementary but separate issue, which likely influences therapeutic alliance and self-management in FND. Future studies should assess its influences on outcome.

Trial registration number

DRKS00024685; German Clinical Trials Register; www.drks.de.

Factors Influencing Triage to Rehabilitation in Functional Movement Disorder

BACKGROUND

Treatment of functional movement disorder (FMD) should be individualized, yet factors determining rehabilitation engagement have not been evaluated. Subspecialty FMD clinics are uniquely poised to explore factors influencing treatment suitability and triage.

OBJECTIVES

To describe our approach and explore factors associated with triage to FMD rehabilitation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 158 consecutive patients with FMD seen for integrated assessment by movement disorders neurology and psychiatry, with the purpose of triage to rehabilitation. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between patients triaged to therapy versus no therapy, and logistic regression was used to explore factors predictive of triage outcome. Change in primary outcome scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (42%) were triaged to FMD therapy from July 2019 to December 2021. Patients triaged to therapy were more likely to have a constant movement disorder, gait disorder and/or tremor, hyperarousal, readiness for change, and people pleasing traits. Patients triaged to no therapy demonstrated persistent diagnostic disagreement, an inability to appreciate motor symptom inconsistency, low self-agency, a propensity to dissociate, and cluster B traits. 90% of patients triaged to rehabilitation had improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to "opt-in" to FMD rehabilitation relies on different factors than those relevant to establishing a diagnosis. Unlike many other neurological disorders, a triage and treatment planning step is recommended to identify those likely to meaningfully engage at that time. Holistic assessment through a transdisciplinary lens, and working collaboratively with the patient is essential to prioritize symptoms, determine engagement, and identify treatment targets.

Lessons from a Neurologist After 25 Years of Functional Neurological Disorder Subspeciality Practice

The idea that a neurologist would do an 'FND clinic' or that functional neurological disorder (FND) could be a subspecialty of neurology would have been outlandish even 20 years ago but has become a reality in many places around the world. In this personal review, I reflect on 25 years of being a neurologist with an interest in FND, initially as a research fellow and later as a consultant/attending. I review lessons from diagnosis and management in the hope that they may assist other neurologists embarking on a similar career as well as other health professionals whose roles overlap.