Functional Neurological Disorders in the medical education: An urgent need to fill the gaps

BACKGROUND

FND is a disabling disease that accounts for 5 to 10% of the reason for consultation in neurology. However, young physicians often say they have little or no training in their management.

AIM

The aim of the present study was to assess whether French junior neurologists, psychiatrists and physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) specialists received teaching on FND during their medical studies, including the residency, and to evaluate their knowledge and perception of the disorder.

METHODS

The survey was distributed by the means of a Google form questionnaire to specialist registrars and young specialists with the help of resident's organizations.

RESULTS

568 respondents from the 3 specialties were included in the study. Most respondents (72.4%) were specialists registrars. Almost half of the respondents (45.5%) answered they never received any teaching on FND, and only 20.5% of them knew the Hoover's sign, a positive sign specific of functional weakness. A large majority of respondents felt they were not sufficiently trained in FND (87.9%), and they did not have sufficient knowledge of these disorders (85.3%).

DISCUSSION

Better training would allow clinicians to make a diagnosis earlier, to better explain it to patients, and to limit the costs associated with diagnosis delays. A better training of clinicians about FND would also improve the prognosis of patients, as early diagnosis and good explanation is associated with a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

This survey shows that there is a gap about FND in the training programs in the medical studies and during the specialization training of young doctors in France.

Outcome Measures for Functional Neurological Disorder: A Review of the Theoretical Complexities

The development and selection of optimal outcome measures is increasingly recognized as a key component of evidence-based medicine, particularly the need for the development of a standardized set of measures for use in clinical trials. This process is particularly complex for functional neurological disorder (FND) for several reasons. FND can present with a wide range of symptoms that resemble the full spectrum of other neurological disorders. Additional physical (e.g., pain, fatigue) and psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety) symptoms are commonly associated with FND, which also can be highly disabling with implications for prognosis, and warrant concurrent assessment, despite an unclear etiological relationship with FND. Furthermore, several unique clinical aspects of FND make it likely that the usual prioritization of "objective" (or clinician-rated) over "subjective" (or patient-rated) measures might not be appropriate. Self-report measures may be more clinically meaningful in this patient population. Despite being a common and disabling disorder, there has been little research into outcome measures in FND, and to date trials have largely used measures designed for the assessment of other disorders. An international FND Core Outcome Measure group (FND-COM) has been established to develop a consensus battery of outcomes for FND: a "core outcome set." In this perspective article, the authors reviewed the process of outcome measure development and selection before considering the specific features of FND affecting the development of a core outcome set, as well as a research agenda to optimize outcome measurement in this complex neuropsychiatric disorder.

The "Neurological Hat Game": A fun way to learn the neurological semiology

INTRODUCTION

In-class courses are deserted by medical students who tend to find it more beneficial to study in books and through online material. New interactive teaching methods, such as serious games increase both performance and motivation. We developed and assessed a new teaching method for neurological semiology using the "Hat Game" as a basis.

METHODS

In this game, two teams of second-year medical students are playing against one another. The game is played with a deck of cards. A neurological symptom or sign is written on each card. Each team gets a predefined period of time to guess as many words as possible. One member is the clue-giver and the others are the guessers. There are three rounds: during the first round, the clue-giver uses any descriptive term he wants and as many as he wants to make his team guess the maximum number of words within the allocated time. During the second round, the clue-giver can only choose one clue-word and, during the third round, he mimes the symptom or sign. The team that has guessed the most cards wins the game. To assess the efficacy of this learning procedure, multiple choices questions (MCQs) were asked before and after the game. Exam results of second-year students on their final university Neurology exam were analyzed. A satisfaction survey was proposed to all participating students.

RESULTS

Among 373 students, 121 volunteers (32.4%) were enrolled in the "Neurology Hat Game" and 112 attended the game. One hundred and seven of the 112 students completed the MCQs with a significant improvement in their responses after the game (P<0.001). The 112 students who completed the satisfaction self-administered questionnaire were very satisfied with this funny new teaching method.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching neurological semiology via the "Hat Game" is an interesting method because it is student-centered, playful and complementary to the lecturer-centered courses. A randomized controlled study would be necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Determinants of survival in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a common cause of younger onset dementia. Little is known about its rate of progression but a recently identified subgroup seems to have an excellent prognosis. Other determinants of survival are unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed survival in a large group of clinically diagnosed bvFTD patients (n = 91) with particular attention to demographic and clinical features at presentation. Of the 91 cases, 50 have died, with pathologic confirmation in 28.

RESULTS

Median survival in the whole group was 9.0 years from symptom onset, and 5.4 years from diagnosis. After the exclusion of 24 "phenocopy" cases, the analysis was repeated in a subgroup of 67 patients. The mean age at symptom onset of the pathologic group was 58.5 years and 16% had a positive family history. Their median survival was 7.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-8.6) from symptom onset and 4.2 years (95% CI 3.4-5.0) from diagnosis. The only factor associated with shorter survival was the presence of language impairment at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with definite frontotemporal dementia have a poor prognosis which is worse if language deficits are also present. This contrasts with the extremely good outcome in those with the phenocopy syndrome: of our 24 patients only 1 has died (of coincident pathology) despite, in some cases, many years of follow-up.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an under-recognised condition. It is characterised by sudden and severe headaches (of "thunderclap" type) associated with multifocal reversible narrowing of the intracranial arteries on neuroradiology. The diagnosis is often established with the resolution of headaches and vasoconstriction. We report two patients with RCVS and review the available literature, to clarify the diagnostic criteria and discuss the treatment options.

[Acute bilateral deafness and facial diplegia as a presentation of occlusion of the basilar artery]

INTRODUCTION

Sudden bilateral deafness and facial weakness are unusual presentations of brain stem stroke.

OBSERVATION

We report the case of a patient who presented successively sudden bilateral deafness and facial diplegia in correlation with a brain stem stroke but without any ischemic pontine lesion.

DISCUSSION

Unlike our case, all of the earlier publications, have reported the presence of ischemic pontine lesions in patients with bilateral deafness and facial diplegia. Selective vulnerability of inner ear to ischemia has been hypothesized but cannot explain the facial diplegia.

CONCLUSION

Our case would suggest extra-neuraxis failure by ischemia of the acoustico-facial nerve.